White House: the United States will avoid conflicts with the Russian Federation in Syria

Ben Rhodes, deputy adviser to the US president on national security, said on CNN that the United States would avoid conflicts with the Russian military in Syria if they were involved in operations against militants of the Islamic State terrorist group.

“If necessary, we will avoid conflicts in the conduct of our operations if the Russians conduct their operations. This is a process in which the Pentagon and its Russian partners will be involved, ”he quotes RIA. "News".

At the same time, Rhodes again voiced the position of Washington that along with operations against terrorists a political settlement is necessary, an important element of which is the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

“If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight the IS, it will have to link this fight with the political process that will lead to Assad’s resignation and long-term stability in the country,” he said.

Earlier in the media there were reports of the strengthening of the “Russian military presence” in Syria, including the transfer of military equipment, armaments and military personnel there, which was perceived in the West as a possible preparation for operations against ISI militants on the side of Assad. In turn, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Russia "will not participate in any military operations in Syria or in other states."

Comments

[valday]

Of course to whom hunting LULY to receive! The simplest thing is that the Americans simply do not bother us in Syria.

[jjj]

Apparently it dawned on them that aviation in the war zone could simply be destroyed

[little girl15]

Since the 40s, they have known that Russians harness for a long time but travel fast. It was the same as the Great Patriotic War when the Allies had to urgently open a 2nd front in 44 to be in time for victory. And when they created their nuclear weapons, having tested it in 49 g .to the great amazement of the United States.

[DenZ]

So in Syria, the scenario is not ruled out when, after hanging the ISIS’s lyule, the American coalition will join ours in order to share the victory and be sympathetic to it.

[Sterlya]

a vicious circle is obtained however. if everything settles down there for example. and the us will want to displace Assad ... But it was not there. The population of Syria will be for Assad. (And the world will be then when all the terrorists are destroyed. Together with the "moderate opposition of the United States".) And what about? the United States will have to get into another provocation, create a new "moderate opposition". (THESE PATIENTS HAVE A MANIACAL STRENGTH TO OVERHEAD ASAD. Like rams will shove, seeing nothing else and not suggesting other options.) Which will also have to be destroyed. In principle, all this is in the plans of the United States. Based on this. There will be no peace in the world as long as the USA exists as it is now

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Where Russia is putting things in order, it’s better for outsiders not to succumb ..!

[Temples]

If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight ISIS, it must ...

Leopard change his spots!
With what fright does Russia owe him?
Beaver, exhale!

[Finches]

Guys, here you need a clear military understanding, as taught:

"Interaction is organized for the entire depth of visibility, and on the map (on the terrain model) for the entire depth of the combat mission.
When organizing interaction, the commander must: coordinate the efforts of the staff, attached and supporting units to accomplish the task; to achieve a common understanding by all commanders of the battle objectives, combat missions and how to accomplish them; outline and agree on the options for units and measures to deceive the enemy, based on the nature of his possible actions, as well as indicate alerts, controls and interactions.
In the course of the battle, interaction is carried out continuously, is constantly refined, and in case of sudden changes in the situation, it is organized anew ....! "

The war, this is not to distribute cookies on the Maidan!

[KazaK Bo]

valday
Of course to whom hunting LULY to receive! The simplest thing is that the Americans simply do not bother us in Syria.

It seems the arguments of V. Putin to Obama that Assad is not a coward Yanukovych ... and if Assad has not been overthrown by opposition for 4 years, but the other way around ... With the support of his own people, he reflects the Atrozian world ... the first place should be put not in the assassination of ASAD in retirement, but in the fight against ISIS ... that it is not necessary to put sticks in the wheels .. and being partners was more convincing! Another US policy THE WORLD WILL NOT UNDERSTAND!
I’m not sure that this partnership will be sincere .. but outwardly the United States will be forced into our coalition ... even as travel companions ..

[marlin1203]

And what is the alternative? There is! Direct clash! Do they need it?

[Dezinto]

“If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight ISIS, it will have to link this fight to a political process that will lead to Assad’s resignation and long-term stability in the country.”

X - the cunning of American speechwriters

Assad has been killing terrorists for the fourth year. And the United States with their fucking bombing-plow the desert!

fucking peace fighters:

[Good me]

Quote: DEZINTO

“If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight ISIS, it will have to link this fight to a political process that will lead to Assad’s resignation and long-term stability in the country.”

X - the cunning of American speechwriters

Again, TWENTY-FIVE ...

Well, Putin told you more than once, both from the UN high rostrum and in other messages that:

[Dyagilev]

It seemed to me that here is you and not Donbas. Everything will depend on the political situation.

[Good me]

Quote: Dyagilev

It seemed to me that here is you and not Donbas. Everything will depend on the political situation.

So far, really, it can only seem ...

All the cards have not yet been revealed, and we do not know how pathetic Putin will be able to lead us.

[rotmistr60]

The US will avoid conflicts with the Russian military in Syria if they participate in operations against militants of the Islamic State terrorist group.

Obviously, this can be understood as follows: if the Russians appear on the horizon, then it is better to withdraw their aviation, and withdraw the "instructors" from the IS positions to the rear.

[Taygerus]

“If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight ISIS, it will have to link this fight to a political process that will lead to Assad’s resignation and long-term stability in the country.”

yeah, but the lip doesn’t crack, the damn stabilizers stabilized already in full for the whole region

[Mountain shooter]

Here. Even if they’ve got a head count on them. GVP clearly said - Obama is not a Syrian citizen, and it is not up to him to decide what government should be there. The monkey and his relatives do not understand again.

[Engineer]

Rumor has it that China has decided to join a coalition with Russia against the IG. Like, even the fleet has already sent. I hope this is not a rumor. Of course, I understand that China has far-reaching raw material plans in this region, but it would be good to weaken the influence of the USA in this region even in this way.

[Krasmash]

Well, this is understandable. Perhaps the Israelis will be substituted for us.

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Quote: Krasmash

Well, this is understandable. Perhaps the Israelis will be substituted for us.

Definitely ... Stab in the back will be, I'm sure! Only no one will know about it (except us) .. Likely nothing terrible "Holocaust" they experienced forgivable, nervous ...

[pexotinec]

Here are bad as ticks clung to Assad. They don’t sleep at night, Russia has brought to nothing all plans for its overthrow.

[aszzz888]

Ben Rhodes said on CNN that the United States will avoid conflicts with the Russian military in Syria if they engage in operations against militants of the Islamic State terrorist group.

Anyway, away from us. And it’s better to jump onto the palm trees right away, until the bananas have showered yet.

[lwxx]

Introduce a ban on aviation flights (except Syrian aviation) and shoot down everything that flew there. Compliance with the ban can be entrusted to us.

[Vladimir 1964]

Quote: lwxx

Introduce a ban on aviation flights (except Syrian aviation) and shoot down everything that flew there. Compliance with the ban can be entrusted to us.

Dear lwxx, but are you serious? Or so, to pick up cheap points.
Just in case, if you are serious, listen once more to Vladimir Vladimirovich’s speech at the UN, where he addresses this issue, however, like Russia's policy, is stated clearly and distinctly.

Something like that.

[lwxx]

I don’t chase points, but it is necessary to listen carefully to GDP speech. Judging by your nickname (year of birth 1964), then you should be able to read between the lines- Compliance with UN legal norms. Did I indicate somewhere that we should do without the permission of the UN Security Council? If we allow bacchanalia in the sky of Syria, then we will get not only government troops but also us, supposedly by mistake. If you remember, the Jews have already bombed warehouses. Well, ranger will not even answer.

[creak]

Quote: lwxx

Introduce a ban on aviation flights (except Syrian aviation) and shoot down everything that flew there

I would have a sword and a horse, but to the line of fire ...
True, it would be necessary to more accurately swing the saber so that we do not inadvertently damage the computer, otherwise we will continue to fight ...

[vovanpain]

Believe the amers? In the 90s they believed. The result is obvious. Polosatics say one thing in words, but do something completely different. You cannot turn your back to such a "partner".

[iliitchitch]

Quote: DEZINTO

“If Russia wants stability in Syria and wants to fight ISIS, it will have to link this fight to a political process that will lead to Assad’s resignation and long-term stability in the country.”

X - the cunning of American speechwriters

There is nowhere to go.
We will come, win (some comrades have doubts?) And stay there for a long time. And oil prices will rise, and our economy will begin to rise, I hope. Don’t bother, PINTAGON.

[roskot]

“If necessary, we will avoid conflicts during our operations if the Russians conduct their operations.

[Altona]

In general, these bastards ... "free" people can easily arrange a friendly fire (friendly fire) ...

[iliitchitch]

Well, the guys forgot the unit, and now what?

[sharp-lad]

And it’s just as easy to catch brotherly greetings!

[zadorin1974]

Gasprom’s revenues from the sale of natural gas do not let Amer live. The main reason for the war in Syria is Assad’s refusal to lay gas pipelines with cheap gas from BV to Europe (to let his corporations boil up and shit Russia). It’s not a problem. After all, it’s not a task — Russians can fight as an adult (what mattresses have repeatedly been convinced of). So their appeal is clear. Please warn when you walk, we’ll get better at home this day.

[Alexey Boukin]

Quote: KazaK Bo

Not sure if this partnership will be sincere ..

What kind of sincerity can we talk about if we hear from the Americans that "Russia should do this, should do that." America is incorrigible, it will always feel itself in the role of "teacher", imposing its "democracy", which brings global chaos.

[Alexey-74]

I think Russia will do everything competently in Syria, our planes and helicopters are already a fact, the marines are there too ... Putin said that they would not participate in ground operations of the Russian Armed Forces, but the question is, but what about special operations? nobody canceled them ... and the Americans just perfectly understood - it's one thing to blow your cheeks and "bomb" in the desert who knows who, and another thing to clash with the Russian Air Force ... in short, pissed off!

[Kalmar]

shorter than pissed!

I would like to believe, but doubts plague me. The fact that they will not butt directly with us (as we will with them) is obvious: they are not fools. But the feeling that the United States is simply tactfully surrendering to the Russian Federation the opportunity to get into Syria and get bogged down there does not leave. And then - according to the well-tried Ukrainian scenario: "Oh, you support bad uncles, here's a pack of sanctions for you." It's time to understand that in terms of cunning the Americans are very confidently overtaking us, so all their diplomatic gestures should be treated with great caution.

[seregatara1969]

I can avoid and I can not ?!

[rosarioagro]

it’s such a pulling of the Russian Federation into the war, encouraging patriotic moods and judging by the comments, the people are being led to this as there is nothing to do

[Kasym]

It is clear why they raised such a screech as soon as the Russian Federation began to strengthen the base. It’s just that no longer flying and bombing with impunity - the plans of the West for air strikes are already in question (even if the Russian air defense will strengthen, for example, S-300 (400)). Anyone should understand that the answer can fly in the sky of Syria. And second, Assad cannot be eliminated anymore - he has somewhere to take refuge - the US plan is no longer realistic.
Hence everything and visits: Turks, Jews, etc. - US plan down the drain, what will the GDP offer !?
And where did everyone get the idea that the GDP was going to fight? And the funny thing is that the super-warriors of the West are afraid to "cross".
Against this background, if Russia has a result in the fight against IS, many will turn their backs on the United States in the region. Now how to achieve this now, without involving your own aircraft?

[Kalmar]

in the sky of Syria, and the answer can fly

From whom? In our right mind, our amers will not shoot.

Assad cannot be eliminated anymore - he has a place to hide

If Assad took refuge somewhere, he’s already, consider, eliminated. Vaughn Yanukovych physically, too, in the end, no one touched, he hid after all, and so what?

super-warriors of the West are afraid to "cross"

Who said they were afraid? They simply don’t need it: Russia will be drawn into a mess, and super-warriors will watch while chewing popcorn and periodically interfering with the little things so that the show does not end ahead of time.

if the Russian Federation has a result in the fight against IS

Those. we can’t figure it out with a hot spot right by the side (Donbass), but there’s nothing to do to frighten someone there far away from home. Doubtful, oh doubtful.

[Makarov]

It even seems to me that their warriors are rushing into battle ... well, those who are dumber (most of the officers and soldiers), but those who are smarter, pack their clothes knowing that they have nothing more to catch there ...

[Good me]

Quote: Makarov

It even seems to me that their warriors are rushing into battle ... well, those who are dumber (most of the officers and soldiers), but those who are smarter, pack their clothes knowing that they have nothing more to catch there ...

This, you, about whom?

Who "packs the clothes"? And where ?

[mamont5]

"Rhodes reiterated Washington's position that, along with operations against terrorists, a political settlement is needed, an important element of which is the resignation of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad."

A peaceful settlement around the world is possible only with the collapse of the United States. I wish IT to happen as soon as possible.
USA - must be destroyed.

[prostofily]

I don’t want to say anything bad about our sergeants, but the USA is a country of sergeants. Just to get it, their psychology books are like that, or they have a psychologist almost God, their brains on such a life are not enough to figure out what is bad.

[Reptiloid]

OU-OU! Everything is lying again. The phrase about Assad is key. Where did you "put away" - death of people, devastation, refugees and cannibalism (removal of organs for sale) everywhere. In Iraq, the center of transplantation in the palace, Ukraine, a new law on I do not remember about others - the same savagery.

[Oman 47]

A FREE ZONE over Syria - and there will be no conflicts!

[alkur]

The political regime cannot be overthrown by force, there will only be chaos. It is necessary to give the current regime to fully unfold and to resolve issues at the legislative level. Even if the partners bring "democracy", who will come to power all the same? Honest people? The dealers will put their puppets, it won't be better. I do not like Assad, but the people support him, and he represents the interests of the country, a strong country and strong people, who don’t like it, live where it’s better, but if you don’t make the world better, then there will be no place for you either. Better to support the current ruler and settle everything legally. Because there will always be, even in a perfect society, a human nature that will cheat, take bribes, offer rewards, etc. So live according to your conscience, and at least sometimes do something for the good of society, and the good will return to you!

[EFRSTR]

"They will avoid conflicts with the Russian Federation in Syria" is a non-binding statement.

[sharp-lad]

Something I did not understand when Syria became a staff of the STGA? Not the terrorists to determine the president in Syria, but the Syrians themselves!

[Vasyan1971]

"... the United States will avoid conflicts with the Russian military in Syria if they participate in operations against the militants of the Islamic State terrorist group."
That is, I understand that if the Russian military on the territory of Syria will participate in operations FOR the militants of the terrorist group "Islamic State", the United States will immediately rush into the conflict without fail? Madhouse, however!