White House: We have clarity on Russia's goals in Syria

37
A representative of the US administration said after the talks between the presidents of the Russian Federation and the United States at the United Nations that Washington believes that Moscow understands the need for a political solution in Syria, but disagreements persist over the fate of Syrian President Bashar Assad.



“I think that the Russians absolutely clearly understood that it is important that there be a political resolution in Syria, that there is a process that aims at a political decision. We have disagreements about what the result of this process should be, ”he quotes RIA "News".

In addition, a representative of the US administration said that now the United States understands the goals of the Russian authorities in Syria.

“We have clarity about their goals. Their goals are to pursue the IS and to support the government (Syria), ”he noted.

Also, the representative of the White House said that Washington does not believe that the strengthening of the Russian military presence in Syria will lead to destructive results.

“The position of the administration will depend on their (Russia) actions in the future. If the Russians use their army only to fight the IS, it can be okay, ”he said.

At the same time, according to a representative of the US administration, if Russian forces start helping Bashar Assad in a “battle with his own people,” this will cause a negative reaction.
  • http://globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    29 September 2015 07: 23
    In addition, a representative of the US administration said that now the United States understands the goals of the Russian authorities in Syria.

    I have always said that A. measures or about Russia think exclusively about singing or are they so deceitful cattle that even talking about them is a fucking tongue ...
    1. +11
      29 September 2015 07: 25
      They will always find even the slightest reason to oppose Russia

      These demagogues will rest against the horn to the last, and when it is not possible they will expose another horn and will rest against it.

      Then - the third horn, the fourth and so on forever. These devils have too many horns.

      The only way to advance your interests is to find solutions and act in your own way.

      As long as there is GDP, decisions and actions will be and there will be movement.

      1. +9
        29 September 2015 07: 32
        Europe feels on its own skin what the "political" decisions have led to in the American way.

        At the same time, according to a representative of the US administration, if Russian forces start helping Bashar Assad in a “battle with his own people,” this will cause a negative reaction.
        Something Poroshenko does not cause a negative reaction, although until the start of the war in the Donbass, there was no particular opposition, just the people dissatisfied with the coup.
        Who is fighting with their own people? Kiev or Assad?
      2. +4
        29 September 2015 07: 40
        Quote: bulvas
        “I think that the Russians understood very precisely that it is important that there is a political resolution in Syria, so that there is a process that sets the goal of a political solution. We have disagreements about what the outcome of this process should be. ”


        Like Ilf and Petrov: "Money in the morning, chairs in the evening" ...

        In the beginning, the LEGITIME PRESIDENT of the SAR, with the support of an international coalition of Kurds, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China (?), Clears the territory of the country from terrorists who consider themselves a "state", AND THEN, in close cooperation with SANE political forces inside the country, there will be a political decision ...

        And do not hesitate, our overseas friends.
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 07: 45
          Quote: Good Me
          LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT OF THE SAR, supported by an international coalition of Kurds, Russia, Iran, Iraq, China (?)

          Oops, so you recognize the Kurds as a subject of international law, with far-reaching consequences
          1. +1
            29 September 2015 08: 48
            Quote: rosarioagro
            you recognize the Kurds as a subject of international law, with far-reaching consequences

            And who has the right to ban the Kurds from creating their own state?
          2. 0
            29 September 2015 08: 53
            Quote: rosarioagro
            Oops, so you recognize the Kurds as a subject of international law, with far-reaching consequences

            Yes, I admit. Apparently, the same thing will have to do both Assad and the Turks ... In general, everyone.

            Now the Kurds, one of the poles of the confrontation of ISIS, and in this they have the same goals with Syria. But there is also a factor in the desire for national independence, neglecting which means getting another conflict in the near future.
      3. 0
        29 September 2015 08: 26
        Arctic fox, here it is understanding in American wassat Americans are disgusted by this understanding. arrogant perverts of democracy
      4. 0
        29 September 2015 08: 50
        There will never be complete mutual understanding between Russia and the USA, there can only be mutual interests .... and the states are false and duplicitous creatures.
    2. +5
      29 September 2015 07: 28
      Everything is clear ... All responsibility for Russia was dropped! Everything is as usual !
      Putin, as always, is right: the USA was shitting on BV and Ukraine, and we are raking!
      1. +2
        29 September 2015 07: 34
        Quote: SS68SS
        I have always said that A. measures or about Russia think exclusively about singing or are they so deceitful cattle that even talking about them is a fucking tongue ...


        - They are just consistent. And if at the moment the interests of the USA require such a position, then they will adhere to it. And if tomorrow it will be beneficial to see terrorists in the "moderate Syrian opposition", you can be sure that the USA will "see clearly" immediately. However, if a week later, in the interests of the USA, it will again support the "moderate Syrian opposition", then, I guarantee, the White House will instantly "rehabilitate" the terrorists and will again supply them with weapons and instructors. And since the USA today is still the dominant force in Europe and the East, no one can hold them accountable for these cases. Unless a couple of Arab refugees from Iraq, Syria or Libya, as part of an act of personal revenge, will blow up something or shoot civilian Americans. But this will only serve to strengthen the position of the American government, as it did in 2011.
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 08: 22
          Quote: Haettenschweiler
          They are just consistent. And if at the moment USA interests require such a position, then it will be they who will adhere to. ... And since USA today is still the dominant force in Europe and the East, no one will be able to hold them accountable for these matters. Unless a couple of Arab refugees from Iraq, Syria or Libya, under the act of personal revenge, they will blow up something or shoot civilians. But this will only serve to strengthen the position of the American government, as it was in 2011.

          Quite a long time ago there was such a film, not very popular - "Cheating" / "The tail wags the dog", directed by Barry Levinson. Here it is - just about this - how "Arab refugees" appear (in the film - Albanian terrorists from a non-existent organization) ... journalists cook up reports about the terrible situation in Albania (not really knowing WHERE it is geographically) ... there is a "injured Albanian girl" who speaks a language that no one understands (there is no such language!), but she is readily translated ...
          All US policy is not based on lies - it is FALSE!
    3. 0
      29 September 2015 07: 50
      Quote: SS68SS
      lying cattle

      This is closer to the truth!
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 11: 50
        And brainless in addition.
        They told them - Assad will not merge!
        They don’t understand a damn human language, oh!
        At the UN General Assembly, a clear message has been given - to refuse to interfere in other people's affairs!
        Pop your own, but damn your own!
    4. 0
      29 September 2015 08: 08
      Quote: SS68SS
      In addition, a representative of the US administration said that now the United States understands the goals of the Russian authorities in Syria.

      I have always said that A. measures or about Russia think exclusively about singing or are they so deceitful cattle that even talking about them is a fucking tongue ...

      ... The second "or" is a couple of orders of magnitude more likely!
    5. 0
      29 September 2015 08: 24
      Not diplomatically, but to the point
    6. 0
      29 September 2015 10: 31
      "If the Russians only use their army to fight IS, it might be okay."
      The representative of the White House.

      And you yourself would not want to participate in this struggle? or, as always, with the wrong hands ...
    7. 0
      29 September 2015 11: 43
      "Or" - 100%!
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +7
    29 September 2015 07: 24
    In general, they agreed with the presence of disagreements.
    Rather, it would have been an election, I got tired of Obama to hell
    amamamamamamamamamamamamamamamamamamam
    1. +5
      29 September 2015 07: 31
      Revolver! Good all!
      To you +!
      But do you think that the attitude towards Russia will radically change with the advent of the new head of the White House ?!
      Something I strongly doubt! Thus, they will put another "talking head" in prison, but the essence of relations with Russia will not change - everything will be the same: Russia must bend!
    2. +3
      29 September 2015 07: 36
      Quote: Nagan
      Rather, it would have been an election, I got tired of Obama to hell

      And in America, nothing changes from the change of presidents. With the advent of the new, it only gets worse. Yes, and then Wang said, the last one is black. In short, the kirdyk is your America Hee hee tongue
    3. +2
      29 September 2015 07: 52
      Quote: Nagan
      Rather, it would have been an election, I got tired of Obama to hell

      Do you think another will come and become better ?! There will be no second Kennedy (the struggle with the Fed and really for democracy), there will be another doll, such as Parsley, which will also be controlled through jo ... the same!
    4. 0
      29 September 2015 12: 09
      Quote: Nagan
      Rather, it would have been an election, I got tired of Obama to hell

      So are you in America?
      What is there even though the press says about the evil of Russia and its devil Putin ???))
      And his, frankly, quite strong speech ??
    5. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 25
    what does it mean? did not agree a fig? BUT our-warned-we are working, you do not meddle ...!
  5. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 26
    If the Russians use their army only to fight IS, it might be okay

    This is unlikely. The base will be a reminder to fans of the thrill that sharp movements are not necessary. And a guarantee of normal elections in Syria, and not another orange revolution.
  6. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 26
    "... If the Russians only use their army to fight IS, it might be okay."

    Oh, how, approving from the very top, it is not for nothing that various patriotic speeches began to move about this in the media "suddenly", in order to use a person, he must be made a hero
  7. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 26
    “I think that the Russians understood very precisely that it is important that there is a political resolution in Syria, so that there is a process that sets the goal of a political solution.

    Well, not an idiot? And what, before the Russians advocated a war ?! fool Another thing is that in Syria there are forces that are on the drum of a political process.
  8. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 26
    Well, finally ... it got to the slow-witted. The phrase "What have you done !!!" from the mouth of the GDP apparently reached, well, I hope I did. Now take the leash for Russia with your head down!
  9. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 27
    Interesting news. Especially against the background of the Americans blocking the resolution proposed by Churkin.
    A game without the right to make a mistake?
  10. +2
    29 September 2015 07: 29
    If the Russians use their army only to fight IS, it could be okay, ”he said.
    Do they want to slip us a second Afghan? I believe our GS has plans for better.
  11. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 34
    Washington does not believe that the strengthening of the Russian military presence in Syria will lead to destructive results.

    Destructive (explicit) here is only the United States. Well, there is Qatar, the Saudis - the Urody. am
  12. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 36
    "" "I think that the Russians understood exactly that it is important that there is a political solution in Syria, that there is a process that aims at a political solution. We have disagreements about what the outcome of this process should be. "" "
    That's it. States want to destroy everything, destabilize. Our desire is stability and No war.
  13. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 37
    Putin made it clear; we won’t fight for everyone.
    but pyahota will not work. I suppose that they had a deal on a compromise:
    -Foot out the igil, chugza. And then the elections, the candidates, candidates .....
    And martin will keep our face and Russia will be in authority and Assad may
    to leave beautifully. Although obviously they will re-elect. Winners are not removed.
  14. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 37
    What a brainless Mayor administration with a scarecrow at the head. Decided, Japanese downtown, Newton's binomial. The need for an uncompromising fight against terrorism and the unacceptability of overthrowing legitimate governments are constantly declared by the GDP and other authorized representatives.
  15. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 38
    “In addition, a spokesman for the American administration said that now the United States understands the goals of the Russian authorities in Syria.
    “We have clarity about their goals. Their goals are to pursue IS and support the (Syrian) government, ”he said.

    It’s hard for them. As "to the duck - on the seventh day." It seems that the Russian leaders never concealed their goals in Syria, but the amers just got it.
  16. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 41
    it would be strange at least if the Yankees suddenly changed their rhetoric! and since the entire rank is chinorem, we know for sure that everything will be as always and Russia can only hope for itself and the Yankees will quietly and openly interfere and crap us.
  17. 0
    29 September 2015 07: 41
    it would be strange at least if the Yankees suddenly changed their rhetoric! and since the entire rank is chinorem, we know for sure that everything will be as always and Russia can only hope for itself and the Yankees will quietly and openly interfere and crap us.
  18. +3
    29 September 2015 07: 47
    Unlike striped-eared, the real ISIS people understood everything. All these crowds of refugees, suddenly, like lemmings, rushing to Europe in an unstoppable crowd, no more than a smokescreen for real IS fighters, reeling from the inevitable "showdown" into a tolerant gamerope, and even with new documents!
    By the way, in these crowds there are less than a third of Syrians, and there are many Kosovar Albanians, Iraqis and Libyans. It is in the crowd, avoiding by all means of registration and identification. And the mattresses, know your mantras, repeat: "Assad must leave." We spent so much money, armed the IS, creating such a formidable Iraqi army that we surrendered everything at once. Now we are creating the Syrian opposition, even better in quality ... but only the bearded are cunning and ruthless beasts. And if September 11 is not enough for striped ears, let them continue in the same spirit. They understood Russia's position. You have not seen a war on your territory for 150 years, otherwise you would really understand.
  19. +1
    29 September 2015 07: 58
    There is no need to get excited, and if you translate these statements from "diplomatic" into Russian, it will immediately become clear that although they are very unpleasant about Russia's participation in Syria, they cannot do anything and are forced to agree with this (gritting their teeth)! "We'd better leave American politics to the politicians from the stands, but we'll take a real look and see that everything is very simple, like an orange: Americans, like a" bulldozer ", are spinning around the world deciding their interests and benefits! They are not at all interested in the fate of humanity, the main thing is the interests of their capital and to "fill the belly" of their "chewing flock" called the American people, so that they have no reasons for discontent!
  20. +1
    29 September 2015 08: 13
    Quote: Oleg147741
    Quote: SS68SS
    lying cattle

    This is closer to the truth!

    no need to offend cattle. cattle give milk, wool and meat. they are useful (cattle I mean)
  21. +1
    29 September 2015 08: 49
    I think that the Russians clearly understood that it is important that there is a political solution in Syria, so that there is a process that aims at a political decision

    Enchanting stupid people. We didn’t understand it - you understood it. And we have been repeating this since 2011!
  22. +1
    29 September 2015 09: 16
    And Putin never hid Russia's goals in Syria. He had long told Amers that Assad would not be torn to pieces by a shabby beast. I would like to swear by seven-story words ... But apparently this will continue until the end of the world. It’s disgusting and bitter to understand that everyone in this world is ruled by money ...
  23. 0
    29 September 2015 09: 44
    Their goals are to pursue IS and support the government (Syria)

    With all their actions and statements, they confirm that their main goal is B. Assad, and not the fight against IS. Already got their stupid obstinacy.
  24. 0
    29 September 2015 10: 42
    We have disagreements about what the outcome of this process should be, ”

    We also have disagreements. The goals do not match. You need Assad, and we need Syria along with Assad.
  25. 0
    29 September 2015 11: 05
    It reached the monkey on the long neck of the giraffe, finally, in just 4 years? !!! ...
    And after that the Baltic states - BRAKES ???
    I'm losing weight with these Yankees ...
  26. 0
    29 September 2015 15: 20
    “We have clarity about their goals. Their goals are to pursue the IS and to support the government (Syria), ”he noted.

    Also, the representative of the White House said that Washington does not believe that the strengthening of the Russian military presence in Syria will lead to destructive results.

    “The position of the administration will depend on their (Russia) actions in the future. If the Russians use their army only to fight the IS, it can be okay, ”he said.

    At the same time, according to a representative of the US administration, if Russian forces start helping Bashar Assad in a “battle with his own people,” this will cause a negative reaction.

    The Yankees have an excellent position. Beat the terrorists, but surrender to the armed "opposition", because "nizza". And the fact that these representatives of the "free Syrian civil society" cannot be distinguished from IS militants even under a microscope is already your problem. So surrender to everyone you see ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"