Baluevsky: Iskander in the Kaliningrad region and the strengthening of the Navy will be an adequate response to the deployment of nuclear weapons in Germany

44
Expansion of the group in the Kaliningrad region, as well as an increase in the activity of the Navy in the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea, will be able to neutralize threats in connection with plans to upgrade the nuclear weapons in the Federal Republic of Germany, said Army General Yuri Baluyevsky, former head of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces.



“Creating and, if necessary, increasing the group of troops in the Kaliningrad region, including by deploying Iskander-M operational tactical missile systems, can be one of the adequate actions of Russia in response to the deployment of modernized US tactical nuclear weapons in Germany and other European countries ", - quotes the general ВПК.name.

According to Baluyevsky, one more measure “may be an increase in military activity in the Baltic and Black seas”.

“At one time front-line planes were based in Crimea aviation The Russian Air Force, capable of carrying, including nuclear ammunition. But Ukraine in every possible way impeded the modernization and replacement of these aircraft. Now our hands are untied. Today, in the Black Sea region, both on land and on the sea, we can do everything we need, ”he said.

The general recalled that "at the end of 80-x - the beginning of 90-s, the Soviet Union assumed obligations, in accordance with which it reduced the number of tactical nuclear weapons."

“Today, all our nuclear weapons are in Russia. And what about the USA? In Europe, according to various estimates, there are now from 20 to 50 American atomic bombs. Previously, these were B-61, then nuclear weapons were modified to the B-61-12 variant. Thus, the US tactical nuclear weapons in Europe have been and remain, moreover, in a modernized version, with increased combat characteristics. And if the United States, others, let's say, our potential adversaries, is threatened only by strategic weapons of the Russian army, then in Europe, in particular, in Germany, in the immediate vicinity of the borders of Russia, there are tactical nuclear weapons that already have a strategic character. ”


“Today, pilots from the German Bundeswehr and other European countries are learning how to use tactical nuclear weapons. For what? Who are they going to fight with? Only with Russia - this is obvious, ”he stressed.

“In addition, airfields in the Baltic republics of the former Soviet Union are also prepared for the landing and use of NATO aircraft capable of carrying nuclear bombs,” he added. “All this creates certain conditions for Russia to take adequate measures.”
  • www.sdelanounas.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    28 September 2015 13: 32
    "Iskanders" -sobering better cucumber pickle ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +16
        28 September 2015 13: 41
        True, I really would not want this adequate answer to be really used. In the meantime, everything goes to this. Maybe today's speech of the President of Russia at the UN General Assembly clarifies some brains?
        1. +24
          28 September 2015 13: 46
          I would not be surprised if the Iskanders at the right time fly much further than their claimed 500 km.

          This is so that they do not expect that in Europe there will be safe places
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +11
      28 September 2015 13: 37
      Nuclear bombs still need to be delivered. Iskanders and additional air defense equipment quickly bring to life.
      1. +5
        28 September 2015 14: 42
        Only now I got the impression that the record is already a little hackneyed. "Iskander in the Kaliningrad region ..." If you count how many times we have responded with this mantra to various hostile attacks against us, then the number of Iskander in the Kaliningrad region per square meter should have already surpassed all reasonable limits ...
    3. +4
      28 September 2015 13: 37
      Now our hands are untied. Today in the Black Sea region, both on land and on the sea, we can do everything we need, ”he said.

      Fine..! Crimea with its catacombs and mountainous terrain ... You can turn around calmly and anything!
    4. +2
      28 September 2015 13: 38
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      "Iskanders" -sobering better cucumber pickle ...

      and who will let the Europeans sober up? they are under occupation.
      (under the country "defeated" fascism wassat Her. with naglosaktsy this does not work) they come. and remain
      1. +2
        28 September 2015 13: 42
        The problem is that the Iskander-M missile system stretches to Berlin with a stretch, and in which case it is unlikely to reach the warehouses with these same B-61-12 bombs.
        1. +3
          28 September 2015 13: 53
          Quote: Lt. Air Force stock
          The problem is that the Iskander-M missile system stretches to Berlin with a stretch, and in which case it is unlikely to reach the warehouses with these same B-61-12 bombs.

          And for this, it is stated:
          as well as an increase in the activity of the Navy in the Black Sea and Baltic, they will be able to neutralize threats in connection with plans to upgrade nuclear weapons in Germany

          On the ships of the Navy there are more long-range missiles than land-limited ones in range!
          1. +2
            28 September 2015 14: 09
            Quote: Starover_Z
            On the ships of the Navy there are more long-range missiles than land-limited ones in range!

            Subsonic Gauges fly for a long time, and their launch is likely to be spotted and ready to reflect (there are many radars in Europe and Scandinavia). Now, if the Russian Navy had an Iskander-M naval variant with an increased range of up to 1000-1600 kilometers, then the time for intercepting missiles would be much less.
        2. +2
          28 September 2015 15: 18
          Sorry for the rhetorical question ... Do you really know the range of the Iskander-M ..? Personally, I doubt the figure of 500 km ..
    5. +3
      28 September 2015 13: 51
      Quote: RUSIVAN
      "Iskanders" -sobering better cucumber pickle ...

      If they were in Cuba or Poplar was placed there, then yes, that would be a decent answer.
      In this case, we are responsible for Germany, not the United States.
      1. 0
        28 September 2015 13: 53
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If they were in Cuba or Poplar was placed there, then yes, that would be a decent answer.
        In this case, we are responsible for Germany, not the United States.

        Well, if it’s just about garlic, then in Cuba place bombs, not missiles. And so yes you are right winked
        1. +1
          28 September 2015 13: 59
          Quote: Sith Lord

          Well, if it’s just about garlic, then in Cuba place bombs, not missiles. AND

          Bombs themselves do not fly.
      2. +1
        28 September 2015 13: 55
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If they were in Cuba or Poplar was placed there, then yes, that would be a decent answer.
        In this case, we are responsible for Germany, not the United States.
        1. 0
          28 September 2015 13: 57
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          Lt. Air Force stock

          For you again
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          or Poplars were placed there,
          1. +1
            28 September 2015 14: 05
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            or Poplars were placed there,

            If only in Alaska or Hawaii, Topol can’t be worked out at medium range, and Boundary has not yet been accepted into service.
        2. +2
          28 September 2015 14: 29
          Poplars in Cuba - Are you laughing? Like a fish needs a bicycle. See the range of Topol missiles on Wikipedia. Before Florida, the same Iskander or club would be quite enough (taking into account the fact that their range is theoretically assumed to be greater than declared). Nobody will shoot from Topol.
    6. +6
      28 September 2015 14: 20
      The brine does not sober up, but relieves withdrawal symptoms (hangover) by restoring the water-salt balance in the body. You are a Russian, Ivan. Do not dishonor the nation! laughing
    7. Tor5
      0
      28 September 2015 14: 32
      Iskander's logic is the best answer.
    8. +3
      28 September 2015 14: 44
      when will these iskanders be put in place? and then just talk ...
  2. +1
    28 September 2015 13: 34
    The Iskanders in the Kaliningrad Region and the strengthening of the Navy will be an adequate response to the deployment of nuclear weapons in Germany

    And rightly so that the adversaries do not relax.
  3. +5
    28 September 2015 13: 34
    Iskander can equip TNW?
    1. +7
      28 September 2015 13: 52
      otherwise, why is it needed, I think the real range differs from the declared
      1. +3
        28 September 2015 15: 25
        At this point, the question arises ... 500 km with a high-explosive warhead weighing 400 kg or a special charge weighing 100 kg ... according to common logic, then it’s likely that it’s not 500 km .. and 700-1000 km
  4. +8
    28 September 2015 13: 35
    I do not even doubt that the Kaliningrad Iskander will have an interesting warhead. wink
  5. +2
    28 September 2015 13: 37
    Yes, the Americans have already abandoned their words about the placement of bombs! It can be seen already drank cucumber pickle!)))
    1. +3
      28 September 2015 13: 43
      Quote: belovur
      Yes, the Americans have already abandoned their words about the placement of bombs! It can be seen already drank cucumber pickle!)))

      no longer matters. given a reason. made. then they will probably not think much
  6. +4
    28 September 2015 13: 39
    Germany should think a hundred times before agreeing to deploy new tactical nuclear weapons on its soil. And it would be even better to change the state-dependent leadership, led by Merkel, for people for whom the interests of their people are higher than the so-called. "Euro-Atlantic solidarity" and the closure of all US military bases.
  7. +1
    28 September 2015 13: 43
    America has achieved its goal: Europe is shaking from Russian weapons, Russia has a "knife" to its throat, and fraera are resting overseas. It's time to remember about the island of freedom.
  8. +1
    28 September 2015 13: 44
    That's right, good declaration, we have something to answer, and let the nonsense think carefully whether they should try their luck.
  9. +6
    28 September 2015 13: 50
    Well, let's see what and how .. Nobody knows! hi
  10. +2
    28 September 2015 13: 53
    Iskanders in the Kaliningrad region will be a cancerous tumor in NATO's body. How not cool, but the outcome is fatal ...
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 15: 28
      Quote: MATROSKIN-53
      Iskanders in the Kaliningrad region will be a cancerous tumor in NATO's body. How not cool, but the outcome is fatal ...

      rather it will be - the surgeon's scalpel ...
  11. +3
    28 September 2015 13: 56
    As I understand it, Caliber caliber cruise missiles with a range of 2,5 and up to 5 thousand km are already ready for Varshavyanka and missile boats. and now the question is if this type of cruise missiles installed on ekranoplanes this is not a violation of the contract after all? And ekranoplanes not only in the sea can walk with us and the rivers are full. laughing
  12. +1
    28 September 2015 14: 00
    Quote: sever.56
    Germany should think a hundred times before agreeing to deploy new tactical nuclear weapons on its soil. And it would be even better to change the state-dependent leadership, led by Merkel, for people for whom the interests of their people are higher than the so-called. "Euro-Atlantic solidarity" and the closure of all US military bases.


    If the mattress mattresses wanted to replace the atomic bombs in Germany, they would have done it quietly and no one would have known about it, it’s not ICBMs, so it’s quite possible to smuggle them in, but what they just announced is going to replace them is it seems more like a political statement, like they scare us and pump hysteria in Europe, I think so
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 21: 49
      Quote: kostyan77708
      If mattresses would like to replace the atomic bombs located in Germany

      But are they not going to replace? It seems that back in 2013, a program was adopted to modernize it with the allocation of 18 billion dollars for the construction of 2 complexes and the modernization of B61. So everything is going according to plan.
      Quote: kostyan77708
      they would do it quietly and no one would know about it,
      Oh oh You completely exclude intelligence and technical intelligence. Despite the fact that intelligence is keeping an accurate record of how many products were made and where they appeared.
      Quote: kostyan77708
      It’s not ICBMs, so it’s quite possible to smuggle them in
      Impossible. Have you heard anything about "atomic" trains? "Sarcophagi" - can you imagine armored thermoses for technical security?
      Quote: kostyan77708
      and the fact that they just announced that they are going to replace it is more like a political statement,
      They say they intend to do so by 2020. But the fact that the "bloodhounds" from the media (probably from our hint, unobtrusive!), Rummaging in financial documents, found the allocation of funds for the re-equipment of German Tornadoes for nuclear weapons carriers - that's exactly what the ama did not expect! A scandal broke out. The F-16C / E is one thing (they seem to be "Amov", although they are in service with the air forces of the NATO countries), and quite another thing - national carriers ... Tornadoes, Eurofighters ...
      Quote: kostyan77708
      like scare us and hysteria in Europe pump
      Unfortunately, this is extremely serious. These are steps to escalate the atomic threat to our country. This is a wedge driven into the process of rapprochement between the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany, which "sickle over the bells" of the Yankes.
      So, the American pig continues to dig its nose in search of truffles in European gardens.
  13. 0
    28 September 2015 14: 01
    Give Adequate Measures !!! THIS PIDA .... AM !!! Stop bending under the dictator ...
  14. +3
    28 September 2015 14: 04
    The Iskanders have completely different tasks ..... of which our general is grinding the wrong way! The threat from US nuclear weapons in Germany is offset by the deployment, or rather, the restoration of the missile army in Belarus ... with updated PIONEER M! Then it will be the same ... and so ...... it's all songs
  15. +3
    28 September 2015 14: 11
    The Americans will look from behind the puddles, but the Germans have provided themselves with a headache.
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 22: 29
      Quote: roskot
      and the Germans provided themselves with a headache.

      The Germans are hostages. The US bases in the FRG are extraterritorial, located on the basis of an agreement within the framework of NATO on the concept of "front lines". They will not leave Europe in good health. It is necessary to drag the Germans over to the idea of ​​EuroNATO together with the Franks while ousting the States for a puddle.
      Then it will be possible to think in European way: not to play with matches on a stack of dry hay, but it is reasonable to build a mutually beneficial policy of peaceful coexistence. IMHO.
  16. +2
    28 September 2015 14: 12
    "Iskander" is more good and different.
  17. 0
    28 September 2015 14: 45
    One thing I cannot understand. Well, medium-range missiles are banned, okay. It is right. But why not riveted conventional large barges with a caliber and their analogue board? So that these barges have only one task. Shoot all of them without leaving their waters for a couple of thousand kilometers. Cheap and cheerful. And to place such in each fleet. Simply already nauseated from all sorts of "unparalleled" products that are only on paper.
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 15: 06
      It is more expensive and worse than Iskander. The ship needs a separate one, it is not so mobile, it will soon light up. In addition, the Iskander has a higher speed, they perform unpredictable maneuvers. Ourselves say that the missile is elusive for today's missile defense.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  18. 0
    28 September 2015 14: 58
    If we talk about the Iskander, then in passing, and focus on their goals and practice of use (a preventive nuclear strike on all possible objects of the likely location of nuclear weapons and their carriers). With an illustration on the maps. With large names of settlements. With affected areas. Everyday. Then every week Then repeat the cycle. Then something else similar to wariness may appear in Europe. The population.
    And so? Well, Russia has some kind of rocket with a wonderful name. So she has these missiles full. One more, one less. Where are they standing? So they are created to fly far. What do we need?
    So either speak objectively or be silent. Significantly. Intrigues and benefits will be a hundred times more.
    An empty chatter indicates only one's own insecurity.
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 15: 22
      Then every week Then repeat the cycle. Then something else similar to wariness may appear in Europe.

      Alertness has long appeared. But the West has an attitude: to devour us in any way in the coming years. I think she will overpower.
      Now hunchback (West) only correct the grave. And so it will be.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  19. +2
    28 September 2015 14: 59
    According to Murakhovsky, the recreated BZHRK will reach a new technical level: now "the creation of special oversized cars" is not required. The complexes "will fully fit into the existing dimensions of railway cars and thereby will be completely hidden from enemy reconnaissance and surveillance."

    “And, in addition, this system will allow launches to be carried out almost anywhere on the railway, unlike the previous system, which required specially prepared sections, removal of the high voltage contact network, and so on,” the expert explained.
    http://cont.ws/post/126939

    These are the complexes! Super!
  20. 0
    28 September 2015 15: 33
    I wonder how many kilotons of warhead is on Iskander? Given its accuracy, this is the best response to the new US bombs; in the North Sea, additional Varshavyanka-type boats should be deployed with nuclear-powered Caliber missiles. 2500 km will shoot through the whole of Europe + Tu-22 in the Crimea.
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 15: 53
      Gauges are relatively new. If anything, then we have Grenades from 83 years in service with YaBCh only range -3000 km.
      http://navy-korabel.livejournal.com/86469.html
    2. +1
      28 September 2015 22: 51
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Given its accuracy, this is the best answer to the new US bombs,
      Undoubtedly. BUT!
      It seems to me that you have a misconception about how OTP will be applied. They will work at airfields, storage bases, arsenals, and command and control centers. The seriousness of intentions is determined by the moment of "submission of products to the carriers", maybe the advanced points ... It is then ... and the "moment of truth" will come! The military is ready, the troops are at their starting points, and they are waiting for the order ... The politicians will decide ...
      May God grant them wisdom and courage!
  21. 0
    28 September 2015 15: 49
    different warheads from iskander and high-explosive and vigorous and cassettes .. how lucky ... and about the cube - I'm for !!! from there they will put - all the scribe to the hegemons - pi - to - to the thrones
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 15: 56
      Fidel used to be young there. Now he, I think, is not up to rockets. They made peace with the Americans. Enough submarines with Yabr.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  22. -1
    28 September 2015 20: 42
    I am for the return of the iron curtain and jammers smile fellow and more nuclear missiles need to aim at the pederast of Europe and aim at Obama am the main thing is to aim larger and larger missiles am
  23. +1
    28 September 2015 20: 54
    Quote: Starover_Z
    On the ships of the Navy there are more long-range missiles than land-limited ones in range!

    On the ships of the Black Sea and Baltic fleets? Long-range missiles? I wonder which ones?

    Quote: KRIG55
    "Iskander" is more good and different.


    Damn, as zadolbali already such statements: "more", "more," more.

    Respected KRIG55! Do you know such a concept as staff? About what, damn it, "more good and different" can we talk ??? In the Kaliningrad region deployed ONE MISSILE BRIGADE... Only one. And the replacement from "Tochka" to "Iskander" will require at least six months (we make two brigade sets a year). There is no question of deploying a new missile brigade at all, and if such an idea arises, it will take 2-3 years. And you are all "faster, bigger and different".

    And as I wrote, even if only MILLION the site will say "MORE" - it's all golem RAVE. More than the state should not put there. Namely 12 launchers and not one and more. Already frankly tired of reading amateurish delusional sayings, wishes on MILITARY REVIEW. Nevertheless, the site is positioning itself as a military, and not for sipping wishes on the bench at the entrance ...

    Quote: over
    I can’t understand one thing. Well, medium-range missiles are forbidden, fine. It is right. But why not riveting ordinary large barges with caliber and their analogue board? So that the task of these barges was only one. Shot by all to-that without leaving your waters for a couple of thousand kilometers.


    Well, you can make such barges. And where are you them "drive" will you? I am not talking about the infrastructure of such divisions, regiments, brigades.
    The maximum that such barges, even with cruise missiles with a range of 2000 km, will reach the middle of Poland. So, what is next. Subsonic missiles with a range of 2000 km will "saw" to their destination for about 3 hours ... What, there will be no time to direct the aircraft to them and shoot them down, not to mention the air defense systems on their way and also shoot them down ???
  24. +1
    28 September 2015 21: 45
    Quote: bmv04636
    As I understand it, caliber cruise missiles with a range of 2,5 and up to 5 thousand km

    And why is the radius not 50 thousand kilometers ??? Where did this one come from? RAVE? Or do you think that in the same overall dimensions with approximately equal parameters, you can get 8-16 times greater range ???? Aw, superconstructors ... Why are you sitting on the site? Such opportunities open before you. To increase by so many times the range with the same weight and size parameters and contrary to all design and physical laws ...

    Quote: Good AAAH
    In addition, the Iskander has a higher speed, they perform unpredictable maneuvers. Ourselves say that the missile is elusive for today's missile defense.

    Yeah, contrary to all the laws of physics ... Ours will not even say that ...

    Quote: loaln
    If we talk about the Iskander, then in passing, and focus on their goals and practice of use (a preventive nuclear strike on all possible objects of the likely location of nuclear weapons and their carriers). With an illustration on the maps. With large names of settlements. With affected areas. Everyday. Then every week Then repeat the cycle. Then something else similar to wariness may appear in Europe. The population.

    Tell me, the publication a few years ago in a network of chart maps on the delivery of nuclear strikes against targets on our territory, indicating cities. of the tonnage, of the zones of precipitation, you were alerted or you treated it like a stuffing, realizing that real schemes for publication are not available. Why do you think that others have similar schemes of ours will cause caution?

  25. +2
    28 September 2015 21: 54
    Quote: Zaurbek
    I wonder how many kilotons of warhead is on Iskander? Given its accuracy, this is the best response to the new US bombs; in the North Sea, additional Varshavyanka-type boats should be deployed with nuclear-powered Caliber missiles. 2500 km will shoot through the whole of Europe + Tu-22 in the Crimea.


    First question
    Do we have there Varshavyanka complex CLUB, or there will only be six and they will be at the Black Sea Fleet?

    The second question
    Where does the range of 2500 km come from? And why not 10000 km? After all, there is no data on these complexes. There is only delirium (stuffing) circulated on the Internet regarding such a range.
    The people do not even try to turn on the brain and calculate, but what is approximately the real range.
    What for? It is better to post hurray-patriotic statements about the Caliber's range of 2500-5000 km. And to calculate the second fuel consumption, the weight of the fuel, the coefficient of energy-mass perfection, the weight of the warhead - why, it's so tiring.
    And most importantly, then there will be disappointment when the range is several times less ... Why spoil your mood ...

    Quote: Good AAAH
    If anything, then we have Grenades from 83 years in service with YaBCh only range -3000 km.

    Yeah. That's already years 20-25 how they are removed from the ships, and most likely, like similar strategic "tomahawks" have already been disposed of

    Quote: Yak-3P
    different warheads from iskander and high-explosive and vigorous and cassettes .. how lucky ... and about the cube - I'm for !!! from there they will put - all the scribe to the hegemons - pi - to - to the thrones


    Someone wrote something correctly. most writers are not "readers", "writers"... Reading the previous topics, or at least what others write, is an extra work. Okay, I will not be too lazy to write again for the strategists proposing to deploy Iskander in Cuba

    1. Take Wikimapia (it’s best for this)
    2. Go from our territory to Cuba
    3... Activate the option "military objectives"
    4... Measure the distance from Cuba and see what military facilities the Iskander can reach.

    After that, go to the punishment of the Leningrad region. Set a mark on the territory of Estonia, and see which objects will hit similar American missiles with a range of 500 km.

    If after that you consider the destruction of Miami, with five to six military institutions like "Center ...."located in the center of the city there is an equivalent replacement for the destruction of Leningrad with its industrial potential, shipyards, the base of the Baltic Fleet, the destruction of the Strategic Missile Forces missile base - feel free to place Iskander missiles in Cuba.
    The Americans will give you a trump card that will allow them to easily withdraw from the INF Treaty, and with the wording on protecting national security from the "Russian missile threat" - they will erect a monument ...

    Quote: Communist
    I am for the return of the iron curtain and jammers and more nuclear missiles should be aimed at pederast Europe and aim at Obama’s barrack the main thing is to aim more and larger missiles

    Absolutely right. And the main thing is that more of these missiles will be aimed at us. Well, figs with him, "to spite my grandmother, I'll get frostbite" ...
  26. +1
    28 September 2015 21: 54
    Quote: Zaurbek
    I wonder how many kilotons of warhead is on Iskander? Given its accuracy, this is the best response to the new US bombs; in the North Sea, additional Varshavyanka-type boats should be deployed with nuclear-powered Caliber missiles. 2500 km will shoot through the whole of Europe + Tu-22 in the Crimea.


    First question
    Do we have there Varshavyanka complex CLUB, or there will only be six and they will be at the Black Sea Fleet?

    The second question
    Where does the range of 2500 km come from? And why not 10000 km? After all, there is no data on these complexes. There is only delirium (stuffing) circulated on the Internet regarding such a range.
    The people do not even try to turn on the brain and calculate, but what is approximately the real range.
    What for? It is better to post hurray-patriotic statements about the Caliber's range of 2500-5000 km. And to calculate the second fuel consumption, the weight of the fuel, the coefficient of energy-mass perfection, the weight of the warhead - why, it's so tiring.
    And most importantly, then there will be disappointment when the range is several times less ... Why spoil your mood ...

    Quote: Good AAAH
    If anything, then we have Grenades from 83 years in service with YaBCh only range -3000 km.

    Yeah. That's already years 20-25 how they are removed from the ships, and most likely, like similar strategic "tomahawks" have already been disposed of

    Quote: Yak-3P
    different warheads from iskander and high-explosive and vigorous and cassettes .. how lucky ... and about the cube - I'm for !!! from there they will put - all the scribe to the hegemons - pi - to - to the thrones


    Someone wrote something correctly. most writers are not "readers", "writers"... Reading the previous topics, or at least what others write, is an extra work. Okay, I will not be too lazy to write again for the strategists proposing to deploy Iskander in Cuba

    1. Take Wikimapia (it’s best for this)
    2. Go from our territory to Cuba
    3... Activate the option "military objectives"
    4... Measure the distance from Cuba and see what military facilities the Iskander can reach.

    After that, go to the punishment of the Leningrad region. Set a mark on the territory of Estonia, and see which objects will hit similar American missiles with a range of 500 km.

    If after that you consider the destruction of Miami, with five to six military institutions like "Center ...."located in the center of the city there is an equivalent replacement for the destruction of Leningrad with its industrial potential, shipyards, the base of the Baltic Fleet, the destruction of the Strategic Missile Forces missile base - feel free to place Iskander missiles in Cuba.
    The Americans will give you a trump card that will allow them to easily withdraw from the INF Treaty, and with the wording on protecting national security from the "Russian missile threat" - they will erect a monument ...

    Quote: Communist
    I am for the return of the iron curtain and jammers and more nuclear missiles should be aimed at pederast Europe and aim at Obama’s barrack the main thing is to aim more and larger missiles

    Absolutely right. And the main thing is that more of these missiles will be aimed at us. Well, figs with him, "to spite my grandmother, I'll get frostbite" ...
  27. 0
    28 September 2015 21: 59
    This is to ensure that these planes stay further from the borders of Russia (where they can be easily intercepted by missiles) and are put on alert "Iskander" and other "nishtyaks", because NATO "jackals" are not based in the Baltic states, Poland, and in general, close to Russia, so that in the Kaliningrad region it makes sense to equip "Poplar" with a cozy "nest".
  28. 0
    28 September 2015 22: 05
    Quote: RUSIVAN
    "Iskanders" -sobering better cucumber pickle ...

    Exactly, they’ll get to Berlin.
  29. 0
    28 September 2015 22: 39
    Quote: proletarian
    it makes sense and "Poplar" to equip a cozy "nest".

    Meaning? Do you see any sense in putting our strategic missiles under attack from conventional artillery? What is the sacred meaning of placing "poplars" in an enclave that is being shot through by artillery ??? This "cozy nest" for "Poplar" can become its "Cozy grave" ....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"