Military Review

NATO Secretary General: It is necessary to reduce the risk of conflict between the troops of the Russian Federation and the international coalition in Syria

28
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on the margins of the UN General Assembly in New York that the United States and Russia should coordinate their actions in Syria in order to prevent possible incidents and incidents between the Russian forces and the international coalition in the fight against the militants of the Islamic State terrorist group.




According to him, it is “too early to determine” the nature of Russian intentions in Syria, however, the “military presence” of the Russian Federation in this country has increased.

"There is a need to at least reduce the risk of conflict between the Russian forces in Syria and the coalition forces fighting the IG," RIA quoted him as saying "News".

It is noted that Stoltenberg also stated the need for a "constructive role" of the Russian Federation in the fight against the "Islamic state".

On Monday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will hold talks in New York.
Photos used:
http://globallookpress.com/
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 28 September 2015 06: 29
    +1
    Well, are you worried about your own skins? Well, maybe ours are just going to poke the fenders in the teeth .. It's time and get used to it ..
    1. Vitaly Anisimov
      Vitaly Anisimov 28 September 2015 07: 03
      +2
      Quote: dmi.pris
      Well, are you worried about your own skins? Well, maybe ours are just going to poke the fenders in the teeth .. It's time and get used to it ..

      They are afraid of the devil ... they know that Russia will not joke! Vaughn Israel immediately ran to Moscow to "whisper" .. bully
    2. little girl15
      little girl15 28 September 2015 07: 21
      0
      They’re afraid of this. But they don’t have the habit of getting tough on their teeth. They got used to dictating their conditions for over 20 years, and getting oh their mouth is like hunting.
      1. Ruswolf
        Ruswolf 28 September 2015 08: 30
        -1
        dmi.pris
        What worried about their own skins?

        They are not afraid for themselves. They know that the Russians will not stop, and in full, to the very end and in the shortest possible time!
        And they don’t feel like it. Lava must steal that stolen, but where if not in the war? But suddenly another ISIS tongue untie? Yes, in Syria, order will begin and others will want to!
        hi
        1. marlin1203
          marlin1203 28 September 2015 09: 48
          +1
          Yes, let them not get confused under their feet and everything will be fine!
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 28 September 2015 06: 31
    +5
    coalition troops - they are afraid that ours is being piled on them for prevention!
    1. Cheshire
      Cheshire 28 September 2015 06: 54
      +1
      And they’re rightly afraid. The Syrians themselves are not averse to practicing air defense, but with our hands at their side they are untied.
    2. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 28 September 2015 07: 12
      0
      The fact is that the USA and NATO have created an international coalition to combat Assad, so they are afraid of the complete destruction of this coalition.
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 06: 34
    0
    “There is a need to at least reduce the risk of a conflict between Russian forces in Syria and coalition forces fighting ISIS,” RIA Novosti quoted him as saying.

    the point is not iron ... wassat
    1. Cheshire
      Cheshire 28 September 2015 06: 58
      -1
      the point is not iron ...

      So let them train. In life, different things can happen ... wassat
  4. dsi
    dsi 28 September 2015 06: 34
    +1
    “There is a need to at least reduce the risk of a conflict between Russian forces in Syria and coalition forces fighting IS”,

    Yes, everything is simple, join your actions with Damascus.
  5. maxxdesign
    maxxdesign 28 September 2015 06: 35
    0
    but why did you get the idea that our soldiers would fight there? Assad soldiers will fight, but with the coordination of our specialists and on our equipment
    1. svp67
      svp67 28 September 2015 06: 37
      +3
      Quote: maxxdesign
      but why did you get the idea that our soldiers would fight there? Assad soldiers will fight, but with the coordination of our specialists and on our equipment

      Here it is different, ours will provide full cover for their bases, including with medium and long-range air defense systems, and this is the entire territory of Syria, on which, without asking anyone, "foreign partners" strike air strikes, so they fear that ours can hinder this VERY much ...
  6. svp67
    svp67 28 September 2015 06: 35
    -1
    “There is a need to at least reduce the risk of a conflict between Russian forces in Syria and coalition forces fighting ISIS,” RIA Novosti quoted him as saying.

    As the saying goes, "feel the difference." They draw parallels between Ukraine and Syria, but they only fear our troops in Syria ...
  7. inkass_98
    inkass_98 28 September 2015 06: 39
    -1
    There is a risk of mutual blows, and a very considerable one. Especially when you consider the desire of some comrades to hurt Russia more painfully. Yes, here is the "Israeli military" on the eve of Syria slammed - ostensibly in response, but it is not very clear to whom and in response to what.
    Moreover, there will be inevitable provocations, so that the number of Boeing aircraft shot down by someone unknown can grow to incredible numbers.
    1. Corsair0304
      Corsair0304 28 September 2015 06: 53
      -1
      It is high time to ban civil aviation flights over ISIS-controlled territory, and at most over Syria to be shot down to an acceptable level to increase security. And all air carriers (and especially passengers) should be warned that if anything, nobody will even get their remains, since the territory is controlled by the Basmachis.
  8. 3 Gorynych
    3 Gorynych 28 September 2015 06: 43
    -1
    “There is a need to at least reduce the risk of a conflict between Russian forces in Syria and coalition forces fighting ISIS,” RIA Novosti quoted him as saying.
    Do not go where they do not ask! And as supplicants stand in line ...
  9. Barakuda
    Barakuda 28 September 2015 06: 43
    0
    Need to reduce risk

    What is it like ? Shoot Obama and NATO Secretary General?
  10. slizhov
    slizhov 28 September 2015 06: 49
    -2
    Down, down ...
    Otherwise, they will make you lower your own ambitions ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Barakuda
      Barakuda 28 September 2015 06: 57
      +1
      There is no ambition. I am for the State of Russia. USSR including.
  11. VadimSt
    VadimSt 28 September 2015 06: 59
    0
    Well yes! For them, this is an international coalition, but for Iraq, Iran, Syria, Russia, and in fact, it is quite possible that China has folk art and amateur performances!
    It seems that in the West, politicians have some common disease that completely turns off the left hemisphere, and only reflexes work on the rest.
  12. The comment was deleted.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 28 September 2015 07: 24
      -1
      Quote: Corsair0304
      Severe, bloody battles lasted 10 days.

      While advancing inland, no one offered them resistance. However, the brave Yankees were not embarrassed by this: they decided that the "cunning Japanese" were trying to lure them away. And only after reaching the opposite side of the island, where the main objects of Japanese military infrastructure were concentrated on the coast of Gertrude Bay, the Americans realized that there was simply no enemy on the island. It took the Americans two days to discover this. And, still not believing themselves, for eight days American soldiers combed the island, ransacking every cave and turning over every stone, looking for the "hidden" soldiers.
      How the Japanese managed to disappear, the Americans learned only after the war.
      The most amazing thing is that even with such a game of "lightning", some of the allies managed to lose more than 300 people killed and wounded. Thirty-one American soldiers died because of the so-called "friendly fire", sincerely believing that the Japanese were shooting, another fifty were shot in the same way. About 31 soldiers were knocked out due to frostbite of the feet and "trench foot" - a fungal infection of the feet, which contributed to the constant humidity and cold.
      In addition, the American destroyer "Abner Reed" was blown up on a Japanese mine, killing 47 people on board and wounded more than 70.
      "In order to knock them (the Japanese) out of there, we ultimately used over 100 troops and a large amount of materiel and tonnage," admiral Sherman admits. The balance of power is unprecedented in the entire history of world wars.
  13. WHG
    WHG 28 September 2015 07: 02
    +2
    What troops are they talking about? They are not there ..
    1. Mainbeam
      Mainbeam 28 September 2015 07: 09
      -1
      Quote: WHG
      They are not there

      American aviation is present.
      Can shoot down anti-aircraft guns; maybe the "Syrian" fighters.
  14. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 28 September 2015 07: 14
    -1
    For some reason I think that these, so to speak, "coalition partners" will try with all their might to do small dirty tricks, so that if something goes wrong, it will not hurt very much, and then shout to the whole world about how "these dark Russians specially shot down our horseradish ".
    And again, I bring in my opinion a very significant story (forgive me those who have already read), after which I just want to exclaim - first agree among ourselves, and we somehow:
    "On August 24, 1943, Operation Cottage, the most significant operation in the history of the American armed forces, ended.
    The Americans prepared hundreds of ships, more than 35500 soldiers, to capture the Japanese island of Kyska.
    On August 15, 7800 experienced fighters landed on the island. Harsh, bloody battles lasted 10 days. In the course of the operation, the Americans lost 103 people killed, 230 soldiers were wounded; the destroyer "Abner Reed" was also lost (71 killed and 43 wounded). Japanese casualties were 0, as the Japanese had evacuated the island two weeks earlier, under cover of fog. "
  15. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 28 September 2015 07: 17
    +2
    Reduce the risk? Yes, easily! Get your "fighters" out of Syria and do not try to provoke our troops covering our bases. And you will be happy! I mean, you won't get a full wallet of luli (and not a kebab) from our fighters.
  16. boris-1230
    boris-1230 28 September 2015 07: 20
    -1
    It is clear on whose side NATO is fighting
  17. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 28 September 2015 07: 22
    -1
    The question is, what kind of international coalition is this? She is? All characters of the play are busy with their affairs. The Turks bomb the Kurds, the Israelis, the Hizbullah, all together do not mind bombing the Syrian army!
    And no one has actually harmed an igil!
    On the other hand, the "coalitions" should not conduct operations against the forces of Assad, and accordingly
    support the Syrian opposition. And really work on an igil! Then there is no risk of conflict
    will be! All in your hands. You will behave correctly, you will be whole, but no, your choice ...
  18. Million
    Million 28 September 2015 07: 59
    -1
    Secretary General Nato himself would be in the trenches. Then an understanding of the value of human life would appear. In the meantime, for them the war is something like a computer game, for which they also pay money
  19. Victor-M
    Victor-M 28 September 2015 10: 05
    0
    NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York that the US and Russia should coordinate their actions in Syria,

    Why coordinate it? Russia acts at the request of its ally, Syria, and what is NATO doing there, who gave it the authority to launch air strikes on the territory of a sovereign state? Conclusion: the NATO coalition acts in violation of the UN Charter and all international norms, and accordingly is the aggressor, which gives the Syrian authorities the right to repulse the aggressor invading Syrian territory.