Military Review

Eyes: for import substitution on 3 trillion rubles you need 2 trillion credits

54
Import substitution in Russia is possible and quite real. But a radical change in the Central Bank’s policy is required, a well-known economist believes.



Eyes: for import substitution on 3 trillion rubles you need 2 trillion credits


The Russian budget is about half dependent on taxes from the oil and gas sector. Despite the dramatic fall in oil prices, the budget for 2015 was set up on the basis of very optimistic estimates. Low oil prices are dragging down the Russian currency and, as a result, the volume of the monetary and credit base is decreasing. But it’s not worthwhile to see only negative moments in the cheapening of oil, said NSN Advisor to the President of Russia on Regional Economic Integration Sergey Glazyev.

“There is no need to create panic because of falling oil prices,” said NSN Eyes. - To reduce the price of black gold you need to look for positive moments! And above all it is - the cheapening of energy. Previously, no one considered separate oil and non-oil budgets. Linking budget expenditures to the price of oil is a rule imposed on us by the International Monetary Fund. It is this approach that played a fatal role in financing our development. Instead of investing petrodollars in development, we buried them in a stabilization fund and gave loans to Western countries. Today we need a budget to transfer everything to normal sources of replenishment. ”

“Every year we lose a trillion rubles due to the export of capital, which goes to offshore zones without paying taxes. A couple more trillions are leaking because of the shadow economy and its inappropriate regulation. If you eliminate these shadow zones, you can compensate for lost revenues from oil. It is necessary to reorganize the tax on the extraction of minerals. This tax should be rented and paid from super-profits from the use of our subsoil, and not be a tax from the consumer, thereby increasing energy prices, ”said the NSN source.

According to the expert, import substitution in our country is real and possible.

“Capacity utilization in knowledge-intensive industries is only 20-30%. Production output can be increased by several times if loans are granted. The calculations carried out by the State Council showed that the potential volume of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans for 2 trillion rubles. And the volume of the monetary base has been decreasing for the second year in a row. Therefore, enterprises are not able to expand production, despite the fact that after the fall of the ruble, the price competitiveness of our products has doubled. And since the debt load of enterprises today amounts to more than half of working capital, there is no possibility to expand production without additional credit. As a result, enterprises, instead of import substitution, simply raise prices to make ends meet. And the Central Bank, trying to suppress inflation by reducing the monetary base, actually strengthens it, ”the presidential adviser complains.

“Import substitution is the most important direction, which is much talked about, but due to the fault of the Central Bank, little is done for its development. To count on this issue only on the initiative of young personnel and talented engineers is not worth it. Our people are capable of heroic deeds, but to force people to commit them every day is not humane, ”summed up Sergei Glazyev in an interview with the National Socialist Party.

Experts note that despite the fact that oil has almost doubled in price, taxes and fees from the oil and gas sector remain the main source of income for the federal budget. In the face of falling industrial production and the lack of reform, there are no chances for oil dependence to be removed. And the announced import substitution policy cannot lead to a significant acceleration of industrial production, as happened after the devaluation of the ruble 1998 of the year, unless supported by large-scale investments.
Originator:
http://nsn.fm/economy/glazev-dlya-importozameshcheniya-na-3-trilliona-rubley-nuzhno-2-trilliona-kreditov.php
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 05: 55 New
    +3
    In the cheapening of black gold you need to look for positive points! And above all, it is the reduction in the cost of energy.
    gasoline to lose weight as "cheaper", and gasoline-threshing floor!
    A couple more trillions are flowing away due to the shadow economy and its misregulation.
    can the shadow economy be regulated? Do I understand correctly? what
    And the Central Bank, seeking to suppress inflation by reducing the monetary base, actually strengthens it, ”complains the presidential adviser.

    to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...
    Our people are capable of heroic deeds, but forcing people to do them every day is not humane, ”summed up Sergey Glazyev in an interview with the NSN.
    yes already used to it! wassat
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 31 New
      0
      Quote: Andrew Y.

      to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

      Yuryevich, so he belongs to Russia laughing
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 06: 53 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Andrew Y.

        to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

        Yuryevich, so he belongs to Russia laughing

        Sanya, then what does he shit at us? whatand ... is he nationalized? request
        1. Ruslan67
          Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 56 New
          +1
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          and then what is he shitting on us?

          And you did that someone would love the employer? recourse
          1. -Barbarian-
            -Barbarian- 28 September 2015 10: 16 New
            -3
            > Low oil prices are pulling down the Russian currency and, as a result, the monetary and credit base is shrinking.

            “For what they fought, our liberals ran into it”. We must live within our means, and not rely on eternal excess profits from the pipe.
            Actually, the current situation in the economy is a logical conclusion from the policy pursued by the "geniuses" of our government with the "guarantor" at the head. After the events on the topic "Krymnash!" and the sanctions of the decaying West, our "q .. effective managers" had to think about the questions posed by expert economists then. Namely:
            1. A gamble with Ukraine was supposed to force the government to think over the consequences of the “Confrontation” to the global alignment of forces (especially since any decision at the state level - ALWAYS has its price). Was there a plan? and its business case?
            2. Where to get the money for the Cold War 2 confrontation?
            3. Any reform on "import substitution" requires a solid "fat reserve", but at whose expense will it be carried out?
            They didn’t answer us then ... However, all subsequent steps showed the full economic insanity of the authorities. And, I’m afraid that they won’t answer now ... But they will find something to “entertain” us with - distracting our attention from internal problems with external “threats”. But here's the thing, propaganda cannot correct the economic pressure. Oil prices and the closure of credit lines (medium and long) will force our government to squeeze its own population to the bottom. Killing, along the way, small and medium-sized businesses. The authorities simply have no choice but to “suck” money from all the “bins”. The first signs are already there - the next reform in the PF. Somehow, 1 was “gone away” a trillion rubles from the PF. But instead of money, pensioners will be offered to "adjust" this expropriation to pension points. Scam in all its glory. To all those who are for the current government - I hope you will have an excuse for the actions of "Putin and Co.", when they will accrue a meager pension. Although with such a liberal “overclocking", I fully admit the idea that the "managers" will be able to eliminate pension as an alien phenomenon.
            1. -Barbarian-
              -Barbarian- 28 September 2015 10: 17 New
              0
              continuation.
              > The potential volume of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans for 2 trillion rubles.
              > And the declared course on import substitution is not able to lead to a significant acceleration of industrial production ... if it is not supported by large-scale investments.

              Import substitution is a beautiful word, but nothing more. The navel will be untied faster than it can remove at least 50% dependence. When they tried to make the economy “open to all winds”, guided by liberal dogmas, they somehow did not think about their production. Not only that, they also boasted of their openness ... However, they could not attract sufficient investment, because they did not simplify taxation for investors. And here is how the "roasted rooster pecked" - stirred. Really, none of them understood the simple truth: "Hope for the best, but get ready for the worst." Apparently they didn’t understand this ... They don’t understand another saying: "For bad deeds they won’t pat on the head."
              Unfortunately, it’s easy to predict the next “steps” of the authorities. Announce the next sale (privatization) of state property. And since there is no money inside the country, foreigners will buy these assets, they will become owners. The authorities will loudly announce to the whole world that they have managed to attract "investments" in the economy, and once again will miss one simple detail from the conversation - these factories-enterprises will ALREADY become not ours. And they will work on someone else’s pocket. In general, everything will be the same as before the revolution, when the share of foreign investment in Russia fluctuated around 50% in the 1904 year: “Thus, the results of introducing foreign capital into the State are as follows: a decrease in the general welfare in the surrounding area and the exhaustion of gold from the country . " A. D. Nechvolodov "From ruin to wealth" 1906
              And if the price for Putin’s adventure is enslavement to Western capital, which will buy up everything that is more or less valuable, what remains of the USSR’s reserves, then let them (the authorities) shoot themselves. Otherwise, the whole world will wash in blood. Because, an offended Russian is scary.
              > If you eliminate these shadow zones, you can compensate for lost oil revenues.

              Of course, I respect Glazyev, but I don’t imagine such “compensation” at all. It is not possible to compensate for the fact that we have "taken" forever from the economy. One can only try to stop the "outflow" of capital. And even then, lost revenue can only be qualified as evidence of the absence of economic and political "brains" in the government.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 07: 00 New
          0
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          Sanya, then what does he shit at us?

          I am not an economist, so do not ask me.
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          and ... is he nationalized?

          And what will it give?
        3. vladimirw
          vladimirw 28 September 2015 12: 36 New
          -2
          Central Bank controlled by the US Federal Reserve, not the Russian government
          1. Karabin
            Karabin 28 September 2015 20: 43 New
            +1
            Quote: vladimirw
            The Central Bank is controlled by the US Federal Reserve,

            The chairman of the Central Bank is approved by the State Duma on the proposal of the president.
            Question: Duma and guarantor controlled by the United States? or, the thought and guarantor of nerds?
      2. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 08: 58 New
        0
        . The calculations carried out by the state council showed that the potential amount of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans worth 2 trillion rubles. And the volume of the monetary base is declining for the second year in a row. Therefore, enterprises are not able to expand production

        Ie Glazyev offers to pump up the economy with cheap money belay
        Well, who will find 2 differences from the procedure for quantitative easing of the Central Bank of the United States?
        strange, in one article, as a result, they promise the collapse of the dollar, and then there is a storm of applause to Glazyev in another. belay
        1. NordUral
          NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 14 New
          +6
          Confused, my friend. Glazyev offers to invest in the economy (in production and agriculture), and the States (or backstage there) in financial speculators.
      3. Strannik.
        Strannik. 28 September 2015 16: 24 New
        0
        Mistake my friend ....
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Das Boot
      Das Boot 28 September 2015 08: 31 New
      +7
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

      from the Central Bank, Yurich, everything looks different.
      Sakhipzadovna said: “It is not our ruble that has weakened, but the euro and the dollar have become more expensive in relation to all currencies in emerging markets” (c)
    4. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 28 September 2015 10: 17 New
      0
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      gasoline to lose weight as "cheaper", and gasoline-threshing floor!

      Well, with respect to the dollar for which oil is sold, it has fallen in price, only this makes it easier for us recourse
    5. Altona
      Altona 28 September 2015 10: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      can the shadow economy be regulated? Do I understand correctly?

      ---------------------
      Part of the volume of the “shadow economy” needs to be taken out of the shadow .. That is, it’s stupid, to legalize the participants and make them pay taxes, those who are engaged in normal activities, and not something criminal — weapons, drugs, prostitution ...
  2. ImPerts
    ImPerts 28 September 2015 05: 58 New
    +1
    You need to start with this, otherwise everything will spread over offshore for a long time. No foreign exchange reserves are enough:
  3. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 28 September 2015 05: 58 New
    +8
    In the cheapening of black gold you need to look for positive points! And above all, it is the reduction in the cost of energy.

    If oil rises in price, then gasoline rises in price because oil rises in price. If oil is getting cheaper, then gasoline is getting more expensive because oil producers and refiners need to compensate for their losses. If oil does not rise in price and does not fall in price, then gasoline rises in price because of inflation.
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 28 September 2015 07: 45 New
      +5
      In the 90s, our so-called "fundamental" monopolies lobbied for themselves a curious law: "on annual compensation for inflation." That is, every year, all monopolists supplying fuel, electricity, vodka, housing and communal services, etc. to our homes received (and are now receiving) from 7 to 15% of the so-called "indexation" supposedly to compensate for the "inflation component", but in fact it laying these very 7-15% in annual inflation. These "inflationary compensations" are put into our budget every year, that is, every year our budget already plans inflation in advance for these percentages. These gentlemen, "monopolists" are already accustomed to this and will not go "back" for anything - just as you can wind up prices just like that, justifying it with "inflation". It’s necessary to immediately abolish this practice of raising the tariffs of “state monopolies” due to mythical “inflation” - on the one hand, and on the other hand, the notorious “VAT refund” should also be immediately canceled — another way to sack the budget by cunning “entrepreneurs”.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 28 September 2015 20: 59 New
        -1
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        we must also immediately cancel the notorious "VAT refund"

        Oh how .. and you know, in general, what is it?

        Quote: Monster_Fat
        another way to sack the budget by cunning "entrepreneurs"

        The fact that various “black schemes” are built on the VAT refund mechanism is not a reason to cancel it. Rather, it is an occasion to improve the mechanism.

        Somehow yes
  4. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 28 September 2015 06: 03 New
    +4
    These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! Yes, inflation will increase in six months, but the economy will be relieved, business activity will rise, and after a while inflation can begin to decrease.
    But the main thing is the nationalization of the Central Bank with subordination to its president. Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 32 New
      0
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West!

      Ingenious wassat But why only 2 trillion, let's print 200 trillion for all that’s enough wassat
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 34 New
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        we’ll print 200 trillion

        And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion wassat
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 36 New
          0
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          And you look Ruslan, couch economists for is the finish laughing Plus the idea, yes ... you give 1000% inflation per month wassat And these people want to live well fool
          1. Ruslan67
            Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 41 New
            +3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And these people want to live well

            ... but they will be bad but not for long request wassat
          2. atalef
            atalef 28 September 2015 09: 07 New
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Plus the idea, yes ... you give 1000% inflation per month

            little
            Zimbabwe
            According to official figures, inflation in this South African country exceeds 2 million percent a year.
        2. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 06: 56 New
          0
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          what are you !? belay I will not pull! am
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 07: 05 New
            +2
            Quote: Andrew Y.
            what are you !? I will not pull!

            Yes bullshit Andryukha, 200 trillion wassat enough for everyone goodmoney will be a shaft ... you will receive a salary so wassat
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 07: 17 New
              +1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              You will receive a salary like this

              belay nightmare: one room is full! wassat
        3. atalef
          atalef 28 September 2015 09: 06 New
          +1
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          Dust for the sailor!
          A new bill appeared in Zimbabwe this week - at 100 billion local dollars.

          it's 100 bubbles. yes for one bill.
      2. Armored optimist
        Armored optimist 28 September 2015 08: 11 New
        +1
        As much as needs. No more no less. Profanity about inflation is a liberal song. Are you a supporter of the Gaidar and Kudrin methods? The less money in the economy, the better? The ideal option is money 0, inflation 0?
        Everything should be within reasonable limits.
    2. venaya
      venaya 28 September 2015 08: 39 New
      -2
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! ... Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
      It is desirable to borrow everywhere, in the west, in the east, in the south, and possibly in the north. The problem is that there is no money yet. It may be easier to find them domestically.
      How to breakenslaving economic agreements", it’s easier said than done here. Nothing happens quickly.
      1. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 09: 12 New
        +2
        Quote: venaya
        It is desirable to borrow everywhere

        In general, it is advisable not to occupy
        States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own.
        Europe takes no one
        Quote: venaya
        The problem is that there is no money yet.

        Money - a rampart (in the world) - just do not really want to give them (to Russia)
        1. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 28 September 2015 10: 13 New
          0
          Quote: atalef
          Europe takes no one


          Alexander, let me disagree with you on this issue. If you pay attention at least to the situation with Greece, Spain and Italy, you will see that the debts of the above states are approaching, and somewhere (Greece) already equal the GDP of these states. So Europe occupies, however, like the United States, whose total debt exceeds all of Europe's combined debts.

          Somehow, everything is occupied, Sasha. yes
        2. venaya
          venaya 28 September 2015 10: 40 New
          0
          Quote: atalef
          ... States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own. ...

          They don’t really want to give money (in the world) (in the world) (Russia) ...
          States have stopped printing their money since December 1913. The Fed’s private organization is printing money for them, hence only official debts of $ 17 trillion, in reality, tens of trillion $.
          And they do not want to give for political reasons, they are trying to impose dependence (external controllability).
        3. IS-80
          IS-80 28 September 2015 14: 43 New
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          In general, it is advisable not to occupy
          States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own.
          Europe takes no one

          Well, Glazyev also offers to print his own. What's wrong?
          Quote: atalef
          Money - a rampart (in the world) - just do not really want to give them (to Russia)

          Why are they needed if you can print them?
      2. forester
        forester 28 September 2015 11: 53 New
        -1
        Quote: venaya
        Quote: armored optimist
        These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! ... Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
        It is desirable to borrow everywhere, in the west, in the east, in the south, and possibly in the north. The problem is that there is no money yet. It may be easier to find them domestically.
        How to breakenslaving economic agreements", it’s easier said than done here. Nothing happens quickly.

        It is within the country — for example, in the salary sheets of government officials and federal deputies on government purchases on payments from the budget to parties presented in the Duma (in my opinion, in 2010 the amount was increased from 5 to 15 rubles for each person who voted for them) and many other budget items that are needed not only cut and generally close
    3. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 04 New
      0
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West


      Quote: armored optimist
      Yes, inflation will increase in six months, but the economy will be relieved, business activity will rise, and after a while inflation can begin to decrease

      How will we reduce inflation? Do you think that pumping money into the economy in half a year will have the effect that it will be possible to start fighting inflation? Do you know how to fight inflation in the first place? - INCREASE THE BET OF THE CENTRAL BANK !!!!
      Quote: armored optimist
      But the main thing is the nationalization of the Central Bank with subordination to its president.

      And better to the State Duma - then the dough will surely be heaps.
      Quote: armored optimist
      . Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.

      First of all, stop selling oil and gas abroad wink
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 09: 36 New
        -2
        Quote: atalef
        How we will reduce inflation

        Sanya, I have a better idea, we won’t print the money, we just issue a credit card in the name of every citizen and we simply transfer 10 million rubles there. We stupidly draw and that's it. We all become millionaires and pay exclusively by credit cards laughing
    4. NordUral
      NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 19 New
      +2
      It is time to return to good Soviet practice - a non-communicating system of two financial flows - cash - for consumption by the people, and cashless on the development of the country's economy. But for this, much will need to be changed in ours? country.
  5. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 28 September 2015 06: 22 New
    +1
    As long as the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there is no need to wait for anything new, about how to expect serious victories from our players .. To accept Glazyev’s right is for them to admit that from 91 years and of them 15 years under Putin, we were not going there, here such simple arithmetic
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 28 September 2015 06: 27 New
      -1
      As long as wild capitalism rules the country, no trillions will help rectify the situation ..
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      While the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there is no need to wait for anything new, about how to expect serious victories from our players ..
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 33 New
      +2
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      While the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there’s no need to wait for anything new,

      That's right, overthrow Putin, put Navalny, so much new will be lol
      1. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 09: 13 New
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        That's right, overthrow Putin, put Navalny, so much new will be

        And if nothing changes, why not try it? wassat
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 09: 37 New
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          And if nothing changes, why not try it?

          Go Bibi Swargai tongue
        2. IS-80
          IS-80 28 September 2015 17: 17 New
          0
          Quote: atalef
          And if nothing changes, why not try it?

          There is an interesting option, but let us exchange Putin and Netanyahu. smile
      2. NordUral
        NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 24 New
        0
        Are you a troll? The specifics of where, and not rotten swamp in bulk.
    3. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 29 September 2015 02: 01 New
      -1
      With my commentary on two sacred cows I stepped ..- Putin and football laughing
  6. Lecha57
    Lecha57 28 September 2015 06: 26 New
    +6
    The central bank must belong to its country, and not to international swindlers who say one thing and do the other.
  7. vfqjh
    vfqjh 28 September 2015 06: 39 New
    0
    It would be his thoughts, but to our economists - liberals in the head ... Until a new wave of sane people in the government appears, everything will be at the level of trepology.
  8. populist
    populist 28 September 2015 06: 53 New
    +3
    Glazyev has long been offering the right actions in the economic field, but no one is listening and will not listen.
    Glazyev’s political potential was skillfully offset by an invitation to advisers.
    It would be better to remain an independent political figure.
    1. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 13 New
      +3
      Quote: populist
      Glazyev’s political potential was skillfully offset by an invitation to advisers.

      Is he in shackles there? Can't quit?
  9. slizhov
    slizhov 28 September 2015 07: 03 New
    0
    Glazyev is an extraordinary person, an extraordinary economist and adviser ...
    Simple, well-known schemes, it’s time not to use it.
    Each situation requires its own approach, and Glazyev never had ready-made “schemes”. There was a problem - he found specific ways to solve it.
    It's time to listen to his suggestions more often, definitely it's time ...
  10. rosarioagro
    rosarioagro 28 September 2015 07: 33 New
    +1
    The key word in Glazyev’s theses is “cardinally”, but this will not happen, they don’t like such abrupt gestures at the top, business can go down, the tops remind me of Louis XV, who was worn with his balance in Europe like a crystal egg, until Frederick II came and I did not destroy all this balance at my discretion.
  11. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 28 September 2015 07: 45 New
    +1
    One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
    What's the use?
    As long as prostitutes are not kicked out of the economic bloc, nothing good will come of it. These creatures will interfere and slow down to the last.
    1. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 17 New
      +4
      Quote: Volzhanin
      One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
      What's the use?

      Well .... not tossing bags.
      I don’t understand his position (Glazyev) at all - his ideas are not accepted by Putin, the government is the same, and for many years
      So resign from this post and do something yourself.
      And so it’s very interesting - the sense of his proposals is zero, and to look - so all the time it seems to be in trend.
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 11 New
        -2
        And as you, my friend liberalst understand this. You are also in the trend in ...
  12. NordUral
    NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 10 New
    +1
    The binding of budget expenditures to the price of oil is a rule imposed on us by the International Monetary Fund. It was this approach that played a fatal role in financing our development.

    It's time to untie from oil and the dollar, and tie the ruble to production.
  13. eyed
    eyed 28 September 2015 10: 12 New
    +3
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Volzhanin
    One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
    What's the use?

    Well .... not tossing bags.
    I don’t understand his position (Glazyev) at all - his ideas are not accepted by Putin, the government is the same, and for many years
    So resign from this post and do something yourself.
    And so it’s very interesting - the sense of his proposals is zero, and to look - so all the time it seems to be in trend.

    "The dog barks, and the caravan goes ..." Glazyev may also be just clever. HSE is driving us, and there is a liberalist on a liberalist. And they are doing everything right - they are denying money and raising prices, they are “fighting” corruption. Everything is right - only for yourself. For us, it’s just impossible to do the right thing, it’s impossible, that's all! Money is not unlimited, it’s not designed for everyone, so it’s not necessary for everyone. And there are not so many favorites, they’ll have enough ....
  14. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 28 September 2015 11: 10 New
    +4
    It's funny When a year ago, the super liberal naibulin unleashed the ruble out of the blue and robbed the people of billions by about 300 cu, the GDP was not too lazy, right there, put off all things and personally spoke on the box. He told me how pleased he was with her work, with the results, presented the Order "for Merit to the Fatherland" - she earned, in general, backed up her authority so that the robbed people would not have much bang. Putin is in favor, so it’s just another tricky plan that is tolerable and then - Raaaz and America crawl on their knees before the rulers of the pipe (the Russian people), it’s nice for the poor to dominate.

    But nothing is heard about Putin’s personal protege and adviser. The boy beats like a fish on ice, says obvious things, he wants to save everyone - and nothing. Putin does not speak for him in the box, does not give orders, only occasionally quietly pulls through the sand. His only friends are the naibulina chm.ryat indiscriminately and continuously, threatened with various punishments, and again nothing. In general, he’s just a whipping boy, he doesn’t receive any public support from the boss, he just pretends that he doesn’t know anything and the citizen sees this for the first time. Not well, why, what good is it, he doesn’t come up with a scheme, he doesn’t bring billions to the owner, he only promises some kind of easier life for some people there. And laughter and sin, the citizen is not generally engaged in that, did not understand where and why he got to, they endure the attitude from here for now, but they will soon devour it if he does not understand what is required of him, or he will speak too loudly.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 28 September 2015 21: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: chunga-changa
      tolerate, yet, but will soon devour

      Not a fact, not a fact. Glazyev’s figure is not worked out and is quite suitable for the myth of the president-chess-player, a multi-way guide. Any conscious Putin will prove to you one or two times that it’s not for nothing that Advisor Glazyev’s bread is eaten, it’s not without reason that Putin has been hit by advice, praises Nabiulin and surrounded himself with the Gaidar liberals. In fact, there is a lot of HPP, and when the time comes “H”, a terrible blow will be dealt to all the bad, in the name of all the good. Well
      America is crawling on its knees
      by itself.
  15. forester
    forester 28 September 2015 11: 40 New
    0
    The abolition of the results of privatization and the nationalization of the fuel and energy complex and other strategic sectors of the country will provide the necessary amount of funds for the development of the import substitution program. Unfortunately, this is unrealistic with this government.
  16. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 29 September 2015 22: 04 New
    0
    Quote: Karabin
    The chairman of the Central Bank is approved by the State Duma on the proposal of the president.
    Question: Duma and guarantor controlled by the United States? or, the thought and guarantor of nerds?

    But the activities of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation are regulated by the IMF and mediated by the Federal State Administration of the SGA! That's all the "secrets" - they are written down in the Constitution of the Russian Federation - the Central Bank is not controlled by the government of the Russian Federation! hi