Military Review

Eyes: for import substitution on 3 trillion rubles you need 2 trillion credits

54
Import substitution in Russia is possible and quite real. But a radical change in the Central Bank’s policy is required, a well-known economist believes.



Eyes: for import substitution on 3 trillion rubles you need 2 trillion credits


The Russian budget is about half dependent on taxes from the oil and gas sector. Despite the dramatic fall in oil prices, the budget for 2015 was set up on the basis of very optimistic estimates. Low oil prices are dragging down the Russian currency and, as a result, the volume of the monetary and credit base is decreasing. But it’s not worthwhile to see only negative moments in the cheapening of oil, said NSN Advisor to the President of Russia on Regional Economic Integration Sergei Glazyev.

“There is no need to create panic because of falling oil prices,” said NSN Eyes. - To reduce the price of black gold you need to look for positive moments! And above all it is - the cheapening of energy. Previously, no one considered separate oil and non-oil budgets. Linking budget expenditures to the price of oil is a rule imposed on us by the International Monetary Fund. It is this approach that played a fatal role in financing our development. Instead of investing petrodollars in development, we buried them in a stabilization fund and gave loans to Western countries. Today we need a budget to transfer everything to normal sources of replenishment. ”

“Every year we lose a trillion rubles due to the export of capital, which goes to offshore zones without paying taxes. Another couple of trillions flow away due to the shadow economy and its misregulation. By eliminating these shadow zones, the lost oil revenues can be offset. Mineral extraction tax needs to be reorganized. This tax should be rent and payable from the super-profit from the use of our subsoil, and not be a tax on the consumer, thereby increasing the price of energy resources, ”said the source of the NSN.

According to the expert, import substitution in our country is real and possible.

“The utilization of production capacities in high-tech industries is only 20-30%. Production output can be increased several times if loans are provided. The calculations carried out by the State Council have shown that the potential volume of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans for 2 trillion rubles. And the volume of the monetary base has been decreasing for the second year in a row. Therefore, enterprises do not have the opportunity to expand production, despite the fact that after the fall of the ruble, the price competitiveness of our products has doubled. And since the debt burden of enterprises today is more than half of the working capital, there is no possibility to expand production without additional credit. As a consequence, enterprises, instead of doing import substitution, simply raise prices to make ends meet. And the Central Bank, trying to suppress inflation by reducing the monetary base, is actually strengthening it, ”the adviser to the president complains.

“Import substitution is the most important area, which is much talked about, but due to the fault of the Central Bank, little is done for its development. It is not worth counting on the initiative of young personnel and talented engineers in this matter. Our people are capable of heroic deeds, but it is not humane to force people to do them every day, ”summed up Sergei Glazyev in an interview with NSN.

Experts note that despite the fact that oil has almost doubled in price, taxes and fees from the oil and gas sector remain the main source of income for the federal budget. In the face of falling industrial production and the lack of reform, there are no chances for oil dependence to be removed. And the announced import substitution policy cannot lead to a significant acceleration of industrial production, as happened after the devaluation of the ruble 1998 of the year, unless supported by large-scale investments.
Originator:
http://nsn.fm/economy/glazev-dlya-importozameshcheniya-na-3-trilliona-rubley-nuzhno-2-trilliona-kreditov.php
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 05: 55
    +3
    In the cheapening of black gold you need to look for positive points! And above all, it is the reduction in the cost of energy.
    gasoline is fucking "cheaper", and gasoline-threshing floor!
    A couple more trillions are flowing away due to the shadow economy and its misregulation.
    can the shadow economy be regulated? Do I understand correctly? what
    And the Central Bank, seeking to suppress inflation by reducing the monetary base, actually strengthens it, ”complains the presidential adviser.

    to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...
    Our people are capable of heroic deeds, but forcing people to do them every day is not humane, ”summed up Sergey Glazyev in an interview with the NSN.
    yes already used to it! wassat
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 31
      0
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich

      to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

      Yuryevich, so he belongs to Russia laughing
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 06: 53
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich

        to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

        Yuryevich, so he belongs to Russia laughing

        Sanya, then what does he shit at us? whatand ... is he nationalized? request
        1. Ruslan67
          Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 56
          +1
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          and then what is he shitting on us?

          And you did that someone would love the employer? recourse
          1. -Barbarian-
            -Barbarian- 28 September 2015 10: 16
            -3
            > Low oil prices are pulling the Russian currency down and, as a result, the monetary and credit base is shrinking.

            "What they fought for, that is what our liberals ran into." We must live within our means, and not count on eternal super profits from the pipe.
            As a matter of fact, the current situation in the economy is a logical conclusion from the policy pursued by the "geniuses" of our government with a "guarantor" at the head. After the events on the topic "Crimeanash!" and the sanctions of the decaying West, our "d .. effective managers" had to think about the questions that were posed by economists-experts then. Namely:
            1. The gamble with Ukraine was supposed to force the government to think over the consequences of "Confrontation" with the global alignment of forces (especially since any decision at the state level ALWAYS has its price). Was there a PLAN? and its economic rationale?
            2. Where to get money for the Cold War-2 confrontation?
            3. Any reform on "import substitution" requires a solid "fat reserve", but at whose expense will it be carried out?
            They did not answer us then ... However, all subsequent steps showed the complete economic insanity of the authorities. And, I'm afraid they won't answer now ... But they will find something to "entertain" us with - distracting our attention from internal problems with external "threats". But the thing is, the economic pressure cannot be corrected by propaganda. Oil prices and the closure of credit lines (medium and long) will force our government to squeeze its own population to the bottom. After killing small and medium businesses along the way. The authorities simply have no choice but to "suck" money from all "bins". The first signs are already there - another reform in the PF. Somehow imperceptibly 1 trillion rubles was "taken away" from the Pension Fund. But instead of money, pensioners will be offered to “correct” this expropriation for pension points. A scam in all its glory. To all those who are in favor of the current government - I hope you will have an excuse for the actions of "Putin and Co" when you will be charged a meager pension. Although with such a liberal "dispersal", I fully admit the idea that "managers" will be able to eliminate the pension, as an alien phenomenon.
            1. -Barbarian-
              -Barbarian- 28 September 2015 10: 17
              0
              continuation.
              > The potential volume of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans for 2 trillion rubles.
              > And the announced course of import substitution is not capable of leading to a significant acceleration of industrial production ... if it is not supported by large-scale investments.

              Import substitution is a beautiful word, but nothing more. The navel will untie faster than it will be possible to remove at least 50% of the addiction. When they tried to make an economy "open to all the winds", guided by liberal dogmas, they somehow did not think about their production. Moreover, they also boasted of their openness ... However, they could not attract sufficient investment, because they did not simplify taxation for investors. And here is how "a roasted rooster pecked" - they began to stir. Really none of them understood the simple truth: "Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst." Apparently they did not understand this ... Just as they do not understand another saying: "They won't pat the head for bad deeds."
              Unfortunately, it is not difficult to predict further "steps" of the authorities. The next sale (privatization) of state property will be announced. And since there is no money inside the country, the purchase of these assets will be carried out by foreigners, and they will become the owners. The authorities will loudly announce to the whole world that they have succeeded in attracting "investments" to the economy, and will once again overlook one simple detail from the conversation - these factories will ALREADY not be ours. And they will work for someone else's pocket. In general, everything will be the same as before the revolution, when the share of foreign investment in Russia fluctuated around 50% in 1904: "Thus, the results of the introduction of foreign capital into the State are as follows: a decrease in the general welfare in the surrounding area and the suction of gold from the country . " A. D. Nechvolodov "From ruin to wealth" 1906
              And if the price for Putin’s adventure is enslavement to Western capital, which will buy up everything that is more or less valuable, what remains of the USSR’s reserves, then let them (the authorities) shoot themselves. Otherwise, the whole world will wash in blood. Because, an offended Russian is scary.
              > If these shadow zones are eliminated, the lost oil revenues can be compensated.

              I, of course, respect Glazyev, but I can’t imagine such "compensation" at all. It is not possible to compensate for what we have "taken away" from the economy forever. You can only try to stop the "outflow" of capital. And even then, the lost income can only be qualified as evidence of the absence of economic and political "brains" in the government.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 07: 00
          0
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Sanya, then what does he shit at us?

          I am not an economist, so do not ask me.
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          and ... is he nationalized?

          And what will it give?
        3. vladimirw
          vladimirw 28 September 2015 12: 36
          -2
          Central Bank controlled by the US Federal Reserve, not the Russian government
          1. Karabin
            Karabin 28 September 2015 20: 43
            +1
            Quote: vladimirw
            The Central Bank is controlled by the US Federal Reserve,

            The chairman of the Central Bank is approved by the State Duma on the proposal of the president.
            Question: Duma and guarantor controlled by the United States? or, the thought and guarantor of nerds?
      2. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 08: 58
        0
        . The calculations carried out by the state council showed that the potential amount of import substitution is 3 trillion rubles. But in order to produce products for this amount, you need to take loans worth 2 trillion rubles. And the volume of the monetary base is declining for the second year in a row. Therefore, enterprises are not able to expand production

        Ie Glazyev offers to pump up the economy with cheap money belay
        Well, who will find 2 differences from the procedure for quantitative easing of the Central Bank of the United States?
        strange, in one article, as a result, they promise the collapse of the dollar, and then there is a storm of applause to Glazyev in another. belay
        1. NordUral
          NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 14
          +6
          Confused, my friend. Glazyev offers to invest in the economy (in production and agriculture), and the States (or backstage there) in financial speculators.
      3. Strannik.
        Strannik. 28 September 2015 16: 24
        0
        Mistake my friend ....
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The boat
      The boat 28 September 2015 08: 31
      +7
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      to whom the Central Bank belongs, it works on ...

      from the Central Bank, Yurich, everything looks different.
      Sakhipzadovna said: “It is not our ruble that has weakened, but the euro and the dollar have become more expensive in relation to all currencies in emerging markets” (c)
    4. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 28 September 2015 10: 17
      0
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      gasoline is fucking "cheaper", and gasoline-threshing floor!

      Well, with respect to the dollar for which oil is sold, it has fallen in price, only this makes it easier for us recourse
    5. Altona
      Altona 28 September 2015 10: 30
      +1
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      can the shadow economy be regulated? Do I understand correctly?

      ---------------------
      Part of the volume of the "shadow economy" must be brought out of the shadows .. That is, it is stupid to legalize the participants and make them pay taxes, those who are engaged in normal activities, and not something criminal - weapons, drugs, prostitution ...
  2. ImPerts
    ImPerts 28 September 2015 05: 58
    +1
    You need to start with this, otherwise everything will spread over offshore for a long time. No foreign exchange reserves are enough:
  3. Mainbeam
    Mainbeam 28 September 2015 05: 58
    +8
    In the cheapening of black gold you need to look for positive points! And above all, it is the reduction in the cost of energy.

    If oil rises in price, then gasoline rises in price because oil rises in price. If oil is getting cheaper, then gasoline is getting more expensive because oil producers and refiners need to compensate for their losses. If oil does not rise in price and does not fall in price, then gasoline rises in price because of inflation.
    1. Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat 28 September 2015 07: 45
      +5
      In the 90s, our so-called "fundamental" monopolies lobbied for themselves an interesting law: "on the annual compensation of inflation." That is, every year, all monopolists supplying our homes with fuel, electricity, vodka, housing and communal services, etc. received (and are now receiving) from 7 to 15% of the so-called "indexation" supposedly to compensate for the "inflationary component", but in fact it is laying these same 7-15% in annual inflation. These "inflationary compensations" are put into our budget every year, that is, every year our budget already plans inflation at this percentage in advance. These gentlemen - "monopolists" are already accustomed to this and will never go "back" - how can you, after all, increase prices just like that, motivating it with "inflation". It is necessary to immediately abolish this practice of raising tariffs of "state monopolies" due to mythical "inflation", on the one hand, and on the other, it is also necessary to immediately abolish the notorious "VAT refund" - another way of looting the budget by smart-ass "entrepreneurs".
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 28 September 2015 20: 59
        -1
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        it is necessary to immediately cancel the notorious "VAT refund"

        Oh how .. and you know, in general, what is it?

        Quote: Monster_Fat
        another way to plunder the budget by smart-ass "entrepreneurs"

        The fact that various "black schemes" are being built on the VAT refund mechanism is not yet a reason for its cancellation. Rather, it is a reason to improve the mechanism.

        Somehow yes
  4. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 28 September 2015 06: 03
    +4
    These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! Yes, inflation will increase in six months, but the economy will be relieved, business activity will rise, and after a while inflation can begin to decrease.
    But the main thing is the nationalization of the Central Bank with subordination to its president. Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 32
      0
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West!

      Ingenious wassat But why only 2 trillion, let's print 200 trillion for all that’s enough wassat
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 34
        +2
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        we’ll print 200 trillion

        And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion wassat
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 36
          0
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          And you look Ruslan, couch economists for is the finish laughing Plus the idea, yes ... you give 1000% inflation per month wassat And these people want to live well fool
          1. Ruslan67
            Ruslan67 28 September 2015 06: 41
            +3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            And these people want to live well

            ... but they will be bad but not for long request wassat
          2. atalef
            atalef 28 September 2015 09: 07
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Plus the idea, yes ... you give 1000% inflation per month

            little
            Zimbabwe
            According to official figures, inflation in this South African country exceeds 2 million percent a year.
        2. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 06: 56
          0
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          what are you !? belay I will not pull! am
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 07: 05
            +2
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            what are you !? I will not pull!

            Yes bullshit Andryukha, 200 trillion wassat enough for everyone goodmoney will be a shaft ... you will receive a salary so wassat
            1. Andrey Yuryevich
              Andrey Yuryevich 28 September 2015 07: 17
              +1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              You will receive a salary like this

              belay nightmare: one room is full! wassat
        3. atalef
          atalef 28 September 2015 09: 06
          +1
          Quote: Ruslan67
          And bullshit that a bottle of vodka will cost a billion

          Dust for the sailor!
          A new bill appeared in Zimbabwe this week - at 100 billion local dollars.

          it's 100 bubbles. yes for one bill.
      2. Armored optimist
        Armored optimist 28 September 2015 08: 11
        +1
        As much as needs. No more no less. Profanity about inflation is a liberal song. Are you a supporter of the Gaidar and Kudrin methods? The less money in the economy, the better? The ideal option is money 0, inflation 0?
        Everything should be within reasonable limits.
    2. venaya
      venaya 28 September 2015 08: 39
      -2
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! ... Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
      It is desirable to borrow everywhere, in the west, in the east, in the south, and possibly in the north. The problem is that there is no money yet. It may be easier to find them domestically.
      How to break "enslaving economic agreements", this is easier said than done. It won't work quickly.
      1. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 09: 12
        +2
        Quote: venaya
        It is desirable to borrow everywhere

        In general, it is advisable not to occupy
        States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own.
        Europe takes no one
        Quote: venaya
        The problem is that there is no money yet.

        Money - a rampart (in the world) - just do not really want to give them (to Russia)
        1. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 28 September 2015 10: 13
          0
          Quote: atalef
          Europe takes no one


          Alexander, let me disagree with you on this issue. If you pay attention at least to the situation with Greece, Spain and Italy, you will see that the debts of the above states are approaching, and somewhere (Greece) already equal the GDP of these states. So Europe occupies, however, like the United States, whose total debt exceeds all of Europe's combined debts.

          Somehow, everything is occupied, Sasha. yes
        2. venaya
          venaya 28 September 2015 10: 40
          0
          Quote: atalef
          ... States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own. ...

          They don’t really want to give money (in the world) (in the world) (Russia) ...
          States have stopped printing their money since December 1913. The Fed’s private organization is printing money for them, hence only official debts of $ 17 trillion, in reality, tens of trillion $.
          And they do not want to give for political reasons, they are trying to impose dependence (external controllability).
        3. IS-80
          IS-80 28 September 2015 14: 43
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          In general, it is advisable not to occupy
          States did not borrow from anyone - they printed their own.
          Europe takes no one

          Well, Glazyev also offers to print his own. What's wrong?
          Quote: atalef
          Money - a rampart (in the world) - just do not really want to give them (to Russia)

          Why are they needed if you can print them?
      2. forester
        forester 28 September 2015 11: 53
        -1
        Quote: venaya
        Quote: armored optimist
        These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West! ... Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.
        It is desirable to borrow everywhere, in the west, in the east, in the south, and possibly in the north. The problem is that there is no money yet. It may be easier to find them domestically.
        How to break "enslaving economic agreements", this is easier said than done. It won't work quickly.

        It is within the country — for example, in the salary sheets of government officials and federal deputies on government purchases on payments from the budget to parties presented in the Duma (in my opinion, in 2010 the amount was increased from 5 to 15 rubles for each person who voted for them) and many other budget items that are needed not only cut and generally close
    3. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 04
      0
      Quote: armored optimist
      These 2 trillion need to be printed, not borrowed in the West


      Quote: armored optimist
      Yes, inflation will increase in six months, but the economy will be relieved, business activity will rise, and after a while inflation can begin to decrease

      How will we reduce inflation? Do you think that pumping money into the economy in half a year will have the effect that it will be possible to start fighting inflation? Do you know how to fight inflation in the first place? - INCREASE THE BET OF THE CENTRAL BANK !!!!
      Quote: armored optimist
      But the main thing is the nationalization of the Central Bank with subordination to its president.

      And better to the State Duma - then the dough will surely be heaps.
      Quote: armored optimist
      . Break all the enslaving economic agreements under which the West actually controls our economy.

      First of all, stop selling oil and gas abroad wink
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 09: 36
        -2
        Quote: atalef
        How we will reduce inflation

        Sanya, I have a better idea, we won’t print the money, we just issue a credit card in the name of every citizen and we simply transfer 10 million rubles there. We stupidly draw and that's it. We all become millionaires and pay exclusively by credit cards laughing
    4. NordUral
      NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 19
      +2
      It is time to return to good Soviet practice - a non-communicating system of two financial flows - cash - for consumption by the people, and cashless on the development of the country's economy. But for this, much will need to be changed in ours? country.
  5. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 28 September 2015 06: 22
    +1
    As long as the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there is no need to wait for anything new, about how to expect serious victories from our players .. To accept Glazyev’s right is for them to admit that from 91 years and of them 15 years under Putin, we were not going there, here such simple arithmetic
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 28 September 2015 06: 27
      -1
      As long as wild capitalism rules the country, no trillions will help rectify the situation ..
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      While the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there is no need to wait for anything new, about how to expect serious victories from our players ..
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 06: 33
      +2
      Quote: afdjhbn67
      While the Putin-Medvedev team is in power, there’s no need to wait for anything new,

      That's right, overthrow Putin, put Navalny, so much new will be lol
      1. atalef
        atalef 28 September 2015 09: 13
        -1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        That's right, overthrow Putin, put Navalny, so much new will be

        And if nothing changes, why not try it? wassat
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 28 September 2015 09: 37
          +1
          Quote: atalef
          And if nothing changes, why not try it?

          Go Bibi Swargai tongue
        2. IS-80
          IS-80 28 September 2015 17: 17
          0
          Quote: atalef
          And if nothing changes, why not try it?

          There is an interesting option, but let us exchange Putin and Netanyahu. smile
      2. NordUral
        NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 24
        0
        Are you a troll? The specifics of where, and not rotten swamp in bulk.
    3. afdjhbn67
      afdjhbn67 29 September 2015 02: 01
      -1
      With my commentary on two sacred cows I stepped ..- Putin and football laughing
  6. Lecha57
    Lecha57 28 September 2015 06: 26
    +6
    The central bank must belong to its country, and not to international swindlers who say one thing and do the other.
  7. vfqjh
    vfqjh 28 September 2015 06: 39
    0
    It would be his thoughts, but to our economists - liberals in the head ... Until a new wave of sane people in the government appears, everything will be at the level of trepology.
  8. populist
    populist 28 September 2015 06: 53
    +3
    Glazyev has long been offering the right actions in the economic field, but no one is listening and will not listen.
    Glazyev’s political potential was skillfully offset by an invitation to advisers.
    It would be better to remain an independent political figure.
    1. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 13
      +3
      Quote: populist
      Glazyev’s political potential was skillfully offset by an invitation to advisers.

      Is he in shackles there? Can't quit?
  9. slizhov
    slizhov 28 September 2015 07: 03
    0
    Glazyev is an extraordinary person, an extraordinary economist and adviser ...
    Simple, well-known schemes, it’s time not to use it.
    Each situation requires its own approach, and Glazyev never had ready-made "schemes". There was a problem - he found concrete ways to solve it.
    It's time to listen to his suggestions more often, definitely it's time ...
  10. rosarioagro
    rosarioagro 28 September 2015 07: 33
    +1
    The key word in Glazyev's theses is "cardinal", but this will not happen, they do not like such abrupt gestures at the top, business can collapse, the top reminds me of Louis XV, who rushed with his balance in Europe like a crystal egg until Frederick II came did not destroy all this balance at its discretion.
  11. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 28 September 2015 07: 45
    +1
    One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
    What's the use?
    As long as prostitutes are not kicked out of the economic bloc, nothing good will come of it. These creatures will interfere and slow down to the last.
    1. atalef
      atalef 28 September 2015 09: 17
      +4
      Quote: Volzhanin
      One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
      What's the use?

      Well .... not tossing bags.
      I don’t understand his position (Glazyev) at all - his ideas are not accepted by Putin, the government is the same, and for many years
      So resign from this post and do something yourself.
      And so it’s very interesting - the sense of his proposals is zero, and to look - so all the time it seems to be in trend.
      1. NordUral
        NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 11
        -2
        And as you, my friend liberalst understand this. You are also in the trend in ...
  12. NordUral
    NordUral 28 September 2015 10: 10
    +1
    The binding of budget expenditures to the price of oil is a rule imposed on us by the International Monetary Fund. It was this approach that played a fatal role in financing our development.

    It's time to untie from oil and the dollar, and tie the ruble to production.
  13. eyed
    eyed 28 September 2015 10: 12
    +3
    Quote: atalef
    Quote: Volzhanin
    One hundred hundredth time a smart man says smart, right things.
    What's the use?

    Well .... not tossing bags.
    I don’t understand his position (Glazyev) at all - his ideas are not accepted by Putin, the government is the same, and for many years
    So resign from this post and do something yourself.
    And so it’s very interesting - the sense of his proposals is zero, and to look - so all the time it seems to be in trend.

    "The dog barks, and the caravan moves on ..." Glazyev may be clever just to the point. We are governed by the HSE, and there is a liberal on a liberal. And they are doing everything right - they are withdrawing money, and prices are increasing, and they are "fighting" corruption. Everything is right - only for ourselves. For us, it is simply impossible to do the right thing, you cannot - and that's it! The money is not unlimited, it is not calculated for everyone, which means that everyone does not need it. And there are not so many chosen ones, they will have enough ...
  14. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 28 September 2015 11: 10
    +4
    It's funny. When a year ago, a super liberal naibulina out of the blue brought down the ruble and robbed the people of billions by about $ 300, GDP was not too lazy, right there, postponed all affairs and personally spoke on TV. He told how pleased he was with her work, the results, presented the order "for services to the fatherland" - she deserved it, in general, backed up with her authority, so that the robbed people would not drink too much. Putin is in favor, so it’s just another cunning plan, so let’s tolerate and then - raaaz and America is crawling on its knees before the rulers of the pipe (the Russian people), the beggars are nice - they dominate.

    But nothing is heard about Putin’s personal protege and adviser. The boy beats like a fish on ice, says obvious things, he wants to save everyone - and nothing. Putin does not speak for him in the box, does not give orders, only occasionally quietly pulls through the sand. His only friends are the naibulina chm.ryat indiscriminately and continuously, threatened with various punishments, and again nothing. In general, he’s just a whipping boy, he doesn’t receive any public support from the boss, he just pretends that he doesn’t know anything and the citizen sees this for the first time. Not well, why, what good is it, he doesn’t come up with a scheme, he doesn’t bring billions to the owner, he only promises some kind of easier life for some people there. And laughter and sin, the citizen is not generally engaged in that, did not understand where and why he got to, they endure the attitude from here for now, but they will soon devour it if he does not understand what is required of him, or he will speak too loudly.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 28 September 2015 21: 05
      +2
      Quote: chunga-changa
      tolerate, yet, but will soon devour

      Not a fact, not a fact. Glazyev is not a perfect figure and is quite suitable for the myth of the president-chess-player-multi-moveer. Any conscientious Putinist will prove to you once or twice that it is not for nothing that he eats the bread of the advisor Glazyev, it is not for nothing that Putin is cunning, as it were, he does not notice this advice, praises nabiulin and surrounded himself with liberal Gaidarists. In fact, there is a very HSP, and when the time "H" comes, a terrible blow will be dealt to everything bad, in the name of all the good. Well
      America is crawling on its knees
      by itself.
  15. forester
    forester 28 September 2015 11: 40
    0
    The abolition of the results of privatization and the nationalization of the fuel and energy complex and other strategic sectors of the country will provide the necessary amount of funds for the development of the import substitution program. Unfortunately, this is unrealistic with this government.
  16. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 29 September 2015 22: 04
    0
    Quote: Karabin
    The chairman of the Central Bank is approved by the State Duma on the proposal of the president.
    Question: Duma and guarantor controlled by the United States? or, the thought and guarantor of nerds?

    But the activities of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation are regulated by the IMF and mediated by the FRS SGA! That's all the "secrets" - they are written in the Constitution of the Russian Federation - the Central Bank is not controlled by the Russian government! hi