Military Review

Hodges: There are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia

140
The commander of the US forces in Europe, Ben Hodges, called the 3 factor, which will significantly complicate the Allied victory over the Russian Federation in the event of a conflict. Reports about it RIA News with reference to the resource Breaking Defense.




According to the general, “the first factor adversely affecting defense capability is the lack of secure radio communications, through which American troops and their allies could safely transmit information to each other without fear of a wiretap.”

The second weak point of the alliance, according to Hodges, is “the absence of a unified information base that would allow the United States and its allies to simultaneously and independently monitor the progress of operations.”

The third reason for a possible defeat was called “the lack of a reliable system that would link radar, artillery guns and personnel at the scene of action at the time of the order to open fire.”
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
140 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Karayakupovo
    Karayakupovo 26 September 2015 11: 18 New
    +78
    Yes, plus the mentality, different languages ​​and unwillingness to die for others.
    1. go21zd45few
      go21zd45few 26 September 2015 11: 28 New
      +61
      The fourth is the unbending will and spirit of the Russian people to protect their homeland.
      1. Glowworm
        Glowworm 26 September 2015 11: 45 New
        +12
        This is the main reason. By listing the rest you can not bother.
        1. Mahmut
          Mahmut 26 September 2015 11: 55 New
          +10
          1) Hodges: there are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia
          2) Hodges named 3 factors that significantly impede the victory of the Allies over the Russian Federation


          In my opinion, the content of the title (1) and the content of the article (2) to put it mildly, do not correspond to each other.
          1. papas-57
            papas-57 26 September 2015 21: 28 New
            +1
            '' In my opinion, the content of the title (1) and the content of the article (2) to put it mildly, do not correspond to each other. '' The Americans themselves are not going to fight. For hell they need it. Under their command, Geyropa will fight.
        2. Sid.74
          Sid.74 26 September 2015 12: 20 New
          +47
          4) Russian trolls that mislead American analysts.
          5) Incomprehensible Russian humor ... wassat
          What, do not believe? fellow
          . wassat
          1. Manul
            Manul 26 September 2015 13: 43 New
            +20
            4) Russian trolls that mislead American analysts.
            5) Incomprehensible Russian humor ..

            laughing good Thank you for having fun! drinks Well and one more point let the bearded fragment add.
          2. Amurets
            Amurets 26 September 2015 15: 43 New
            +13
            And also a Russian mat! During the Second World War, German gunners and front-line intelligence officers couldn’t understand anything when ours switched to this method of “encryption” in the heat of battle.
            1. Weyland
              Weyland 27 September 2015 17: 38 New
              +1
              This is not even the case: during WWII it turned out that representatives of peoples with the most concise language have an advantage in aerial combat who has the same phrase consists of fewer letters. It was established that the German language has an advantage over the Russian literary in this - but is much inferior to the Russian obscene wink
            2. Weyland
              Weyland 27 September 2015 17: 38 New
              0
              This is not even the case: during WWII it turned out that representatives of peoples with the most concise language have an advantage in aerial combat who has the same phrase consists of fewer letters. It was established that the German language has an advantage over the Russian literary in this - but is much inferior to the Russian obscene wink
              1. Throw
                Throw 27 September 2015 20: 02 New
                +1
                And in confirmation of the great and powerful non-normative: http://frazilla.narod.ru/mat_army.htm

                I won’t post the text, otherwise it will be banned again wassat
          3. poquello
            poquello 26 September 2015 21: 44 New
            +7
            Quote: Sid.74
            4) Russian trolls that mislead American analysts.
            5) Incomprehensible Russian humor ... wassat
            What, do not believe? fellow
            . wassat

            the indefinite article is not given to them in any way, and those who begin to understand a little - begin to want to live in Russia
          4. kush62
            kush62 27 September 2015 13: 02 New
            +3
            Sid. 74 (4) Yesterday, 12:20 ↑
            4) Russian trolls that mislead American analysts.
            5) Incomprehensible Russian humor ...
            What, do not believe?

            If you answer: “Yes, probably not.” Then after such an answer, any amer’s brain will boil.
        3. Penzyac
          Penzyac 26 September 2015 18: 07 New
          +8
          Quote: Firefly
          This is the main reason. By listing the rest you can not bother.

          They always think that the main thing is engineering and technology, but in fact, the main thing is people, everything else is a matter of gain ...
          Well, after all, they measure everything and everyone on their own, but probably not in vain the famous Russian (which is typical) says that this should not be done - it has been verified by a thousand-year history ...
        4. Sterlya
          Sterlya 26 September 2015 19: 33 New
          +2
          so for me, I don’t see any reason why a Westerner with some diapers could have won. stoned .. it won't be easy. but trouble for them all
        5. mamont5
          mamont5 27 September 2015 08: 04 New
          +2
          1 reason - this is the fact that single, joint Russian forces will fight.
          2 reason - the enemy is a bunch of different-sized European “armies” that will each pursue their own goals, wait for the US to “protect” them, and when it “smells fried” they will quickly clog in the corners.
          3 reason - the United States will command this motley crowd, which NEVER fought against a strong opponent on their own, never won, and who will push Europe forward so that they "carry chestnuts out of the fire for them" (which does not correspond to the goals of Europe). And when it “smells fried,” these “leaders” will quickly rinse off to their continent to sit out, as always.
          And our main and most difficult task is not to let them sit this time.
      2. bashmak
        bashmak 26 September 2015 11: 50 New
        +3
        this is the first factor!
        1. lelikas
          lelikas 26 September 2015 14: 27 New
          +2
          Hardworking Japanese, accustomed to being "injected by robots" for them -
          https://youtu.be/c9YfIIivBKo
        2. lelikas
          lelikas 26 September 2015 14: 28 New
          +24

          choyta not attached.
          Hardworking Japanese, accustomed to being "injected by robots" for them -
          1. Platonich
            Platonich 26 September 2015 16: 39 New
            +8
            Got an unforgettable pleasure from such a hectic situation!
          2. Mainbeam
            Mainbeam 26 September 2015 17: 30 New
            +10
            Quote: lelikas
            Hardworking japanese

            A Mouzon something in the subject!
          3. Corsair
            Corsair 26 September 2015 20: 17 New
            +6
            belay are they trying to disconnect the goose link for 20-30 minutes? and what is interesting is not immediately put back? and what did 9 (!) people do there? belay
            1. lelikas
              lelikas 26 September 2015 21: 13 New
              +4
              Quote: Corsair
              are they trying to disconnect the goose link for 20-30 minutes? and what is interesting is not immediately put back? and what did 9 (!) people do there?

              At critical moments, there were 12 of them!
              1. The stranger
                The stranger 26 September 2015 23: 35 New
                +4
                So they gained a critical mass of mind. Not even 7 minutes had passed when the sledgehammer first appeared.
                I am impressed!:))
            2. pilot8878
              pilot8878 27 September 2015 20: 51 New
              +1
              Quote: Corsair
              are they trying to disconnect the goose link for 20-30 minutes? and what is interesting is not immediately put back? and what did 9 (!) people do there?

              I, too, did not leave the persistent feeling that they were the first time they saw a lump.
          4. dudinets
            dudinets 27 September 2015 08: 43 New
            +5
            pancake! stretch with raisins! and if they shot nearby!
            "Japanese tanker" from this day I have equal to the title of "British scientist"
            1. The stranger
              The stranger 27 September 2015 11: 51 New
              +1
              Yes, yes, yes, a strong, bright act! :))
              We once would have probably shot half the brigade for such a thing :) Maybe that's why caterpillars were repaired. And I still have a real sledgehammer from spare parts in UAZ.
          5. the villain
            the villain 28 September 2015 00: 12 New
            0
            Quote: lelikas
            Hardworking japanese

            And I remembered the old joke, well, where the tankers were repairing the goose, and the good fairy came up to them and wondered: "What are you doing, good fellows?" And the tankers answered her: Can’t you see something .... (we live a stormy, difficult, but active sex life) !!! ”the fairy asked:“ Do you really want to? ”Tankers said“ We want, beauty, really want !!! "The fairy smiled, and the tower fell off the tank wink
            The Japs of this fairy there were clearly not enough for complete happiness laughing
      3. meriem1
        meriem1 26 September 2015 12: 41 New
        +6
        Quote: go21zd45few
        The fourth is the unbending will and spirit of the Russian people to protect their homeland.


        And healthy nonsense multiplied by experience and fearlessness. The Pashtuns in Afghanistan, oh ... what WARRIORS. But even they respect!
        But this is DIAGNOSIS !!!!
      4. BilliBoms09
        BilliBoms09 26 September 2015 12: 42 New
        +12
        Nonsense American Hodges says, if there is a war between NATO and Russia, then as one smart Jew (Einstein) said: "the next war will be fought with clubs." I’ll add from myself, if at all, to anyone.
      5. Zoldat_A
        Zoldat_A 26 September 2015 13: 57 New
        +9
        Quote: go21zd45few
        The fourth is the unbending will and spirit of the Russian people to protect their homeland.

        This reason alone is enough to block all the positive qualities of our "potential friends," as the GDP said.

        I'm wondering - For centuries, Russians have beaten everyone who came to them with the war. Why is America sure that the tradition will be interrupted and that it will be lucky to destroy Russia right now?

        And further. History, as you know, moves in a spiral. 1939-th has already come, so there will be 45-th. Here are just today's gavkalki from Poland, the Baltic states and others - what they think about it? After all, after the new 45 year, their descendants will natsut at their graves. Did they forget denazification in Germany? And the same Poland, by its venal nature, is now drawn to the one who prints dollars, and then reaches out to the one who protects it from gas chambers. They in Europe do not understand that they are consumables for the Washington regional committee?
      6. Penzyac
        Penzyac 26 September 2015 18: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: go21zd45few
        The fourth is the unbending will and spirit of the Russian people to protect their homeland.

        This is just the most important thing that NATO members cannot understand, due to the lack of such among Westerners. Before them, there have never been wars in their history to destroy them, on the contrary, it was they who always tried to destroy other nations different from them, if not physically, then spiritually ...
    2. Doctor Savage
      Doctor Savage 26 September 2015 11: 28 New
      +8
      It’s like in that parable ....
      Also about the general.

      He says: "There are three reasons why they were beaten.

      First: there was no gunpowder. "
      1. figwam
        figwam 26 September 2015 11: 43 New
        +6
        US forces commander in Europe Ben Hodges named 3 factors that will significantly complicate the allies' victory over Russia

        Do not even think...
      2. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
        Andrei from Chelyabinsk 26 September 2015 12: 05 New
        +8
        Quote: Doctor Savage
        It’s like in that parable ....
        Also about the general.

        No, it’s not there.
        They call the commandant of the Kronstadt fortress before the bright eyes of Admiral General and ask:
        - Why didn’t you, so-and-so, give a salute in honor of the namesake of Her Imperial Highness ?!
        To which the commandant replied:
        - There were 30 reasons for this, the first of them - I didn’t have gunpowder ...
        He was not allowed to continue.
    3. Samaritan
      Samaritan 26 September 2015 11: 31 New
      +13
      What I don’t understand ... They have always been proud of this, but this is their main problem ???
      1. krot_tank
        krot_tank 26 September 2015 12: 23 New
        +3
        Grandmas need to cut! For development, testing, production. Following the example with the F-35, hell wouldn’t work. Therefore, the headstock for the development, testing, production ... There is a match for allies - since the standards of NATO, the USA set - therefore, American companies will produce the lion's share of the equipment.
      2. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 26 September 2015 13: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: Samaritan
        What I don’t understand ... They have always been proud of this, but this is their main problem ???


        You know, Andrey, something I didn’t understand! Such a statement from the lips of the military gives off some kind of nonsense, well, or as an option - a consequence of the use of psychotropic or alcoholic means. For all three factors determine the degree of combat readiness, to one degree or another.
        And such a recognition of the commander in theory should draw the Pentagon’s attention to the question of where the billions of US budget funds allocated for combat training go.

        Well, like that. fool
        1. Corsair
          Corsair 26 September 2015 20: 29 New
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          And such a recognition of the commander in theory should draw the attention of the Pentagon to the issue

          laughing You have too good an opinion about the Pentagon, there they are all incidentally on the salaries of large consortiums / corporations that produce military-industrial complex, whose main profit is sales - and what’s most important in sales now? That's right - splurge, marketing nyashki and advertising, plus an administrative resource that allows you to vparit their goods "friends allies and more.
        2. Corsair
          Corsair 26 September 2015 20: 29 New
          0
          Quote: Vladimir 1964
          And such a recognition of the commander in theory should draw the attention of the Pentagon to the issue

          laughing You have too good an opinion about the Pentagon, there they are all incidentally on the salaries of large consortiums / corporations that produce military-industrial complex, whose main profit is sales - and what’s most important in sales now? That's right - splurge, marketing nyashki and advertising, plus an administrative resource that allows you to vparit their goods "friends allies and more.
    4. ZU-23
      ZU-23 26 September 2015 11: 32 New
      +5
      You can also add a lack of motivation, mental and narcotic disorders of the personnel. An example of dill and Donbass.
      1. amirbek
        amirbek 26 September 2015 11: 40 New
        +8
        NATO will lose to Russia by any means because it does not celebrate May 9 - Victory Day!
        1. Penzyac
          Penzyac 26 September 2015 18: 33 New
          0
          Quote: Amirbek
          NATO will lose to Russia by any means because it does not celebrate May 9 - Victory Day!

          But they hold pederast parades ... fool
    5. Andrea
      Andrea 26 September 2015 11: 38 New
      +4
      Quote: Karayakupovo

      Yes, plus the mentality, different languages ​​and unwillingness to die for others.
      So gentlemen seriously want to start a war with Russia.
      I don’t think they know the story poorly - Russia has always acted in response.
      I have already noted that somehow it’s enough to knock out NATO personnel. The population of NATO member countries is categorically not capable of recruiting. Moreover, as was noted, fighting for someone’s interests.
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 26 September 2015 11: 50 New
        +8
        with the help of which American troops and their allies could safely transmit information to each other without fear of wiretapping. ”

        Uri, where's the button ... Uri, Uri ... (remember the movie x \ "Electronics")
        1. meriem1
          meriem1 26 September 2015 12: 52 New
          +1
          COOL!!!!!!! Here is this product!
        2. sabakina
          sabakina 26 September 2015 13: 04 New
          +4
          Meehan is right ...


          Hodges: There are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia

          Well, finally I.Nikolaev has long been responsible for the commander ...
          The first reason is you
          And the second is all your dreams
          The third is all your words
    6. marlin1203
      marlin1203 26 September 2015 13: 22 New
      +3
      The main reason is that the three he listed are complete bullshit and technical trifle. The main reason is that the Russians almost never leave the state of war, both external and internal. And "Strength in Truth" is purely our essence.
    7. mikh-korsakov
      mikh-korsakov 26 September 2015 13: 32 New
      0
      Yes, plus an unshakable rule to arrange a coffee break at 10 am, and at that time ...
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. siberalt
      siberalt 26 September 2015 14: 04 New
      +1
      Point one - it is impossible to defeat Russia. And then, on other points, let all these ex-generals fantasize according to the method - "when the cat is not fucking, ..." laughing
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 26 September 2015 15: 54 New
        +1
        It seems the general drank a glass of tincture of glucogenic mushrooms on undiluted alcohol and ate a hemp with a self-rolled cigarette.
        1. Penzyac
          Penzyac 26 September 2015 19: 20 New
          0
          Quote: Amurets
          It seems the general drank a glass of tincture of glucogenic mushrooms on undiluted alcohol and ate a hemp with a self-rolled cigarette.

          From a divorce, he would die;
      2. Penzyac
        Penzyac 26 September 2015 19: 05 New
        0
        Quote: siberalt
        Point one - it is impossible to defeat Russia. And then, on other points, let all these ex-generals fantasize according to the method - "when the cat is not fucking, ..." laughing

        Only Russia can defeat Russia (“soft power” with the goal of reformatting Russia and betraying the “elite”), old Brzezinski is probably the last to understand this. Fortunately, his plans to come true to a sufficient extent were not destined ...
    10. CAMS
      CAMS 26 September 2015 15: 33 New
      +4
      FIRST AND BASIC - FEAR FROM RUSSIAN! THAT'S WHICH RELAXES YOUR Z / P AND WILL NOT LET YOU TO WIN. The Russian nation has a great, invincible historical heritage. The memory of the victims of their ancestors, their heroism will not allow new generations to calmly lay down their arms. This is expressed in self-sacrifice in a peaceful life. My neighbor saved a child in the sea, drowned in front of his children, did not have the strength to fight the sea, and saved the girl! BESLAN !! ! UNDER THE FIRE OF Militants RESCUE, KILLED CHILDREN !!! WHO DOES NOT WANT TO BE AT THIS TIME THERE, SAVE THE CHILDREN TO COVER THEM WITH THEIR BODY !!! Volodya told the truth, if a Russian fights for a just cause, HE IS UNBEATABLE !!!
    11. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 26 September 2015 20: 26 New
      +2
      Hodges: There are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia


      forgot the fourth
    12. papas-57
      papas-57 26 September 2015 21: 21 New
      +3
      And also complete inability to fight without air supremacy, which will not exist in the war with Russia.
    13. The stranger
      The stranger 26 September 2015 23: 40 New
      +1
      And also item 0. - the root cause. The population of NATO countries is not going to fight with Russians at all, and NATO officials certainly will not win. So let the general amuse himself with cool excuses.
    14. Drmadfisher
      Drmadfisher 27 September 2015 03: 43 New
      0
      the Poles and the slow-witted ones will be dumped first, and which, like the little brother and the rest of the eastern part of the Oyropa, will scratch their skull intensely
      1. The stranger
        The stranger 27 September 2015 11: 45 New
        0
        They will not, for lack of what shares with the Russians. All existing peoples are capable of fighting, otherwise they would have disappeared into centuries, as many already. True, there are other reasons for extinction besides war, but this, say, is the second approximation under this consideration. Today, Russians are not climbing on anyone, taking anything from anyone, demanding nothing, and therefore there is simply no REAL reason for fighting them. Nobody will fight with them for the sake of the Americans either - the Americans themselves have tried to annoy everyone and lose confidence and the last blind fools. It seems that the last case was Libya, the results are already obvious to everyone, which is why the European woman is very ashamed about the silence. And let the fighting Pindotrolls still squeak like raped blacks such as myself - “paid agents of the bloody Botox dwarf, KGB, housing and communal services, communism, Martians, Sport lotto” - the trend has already changed. From which the generals are already doing excuses, and not military and strategic planning.
        Like the same missile defense system that will be crushed quickly, due to its a priori insufficiency, or absolutely desperate deployments of several tanks in each country. Which are clearly simply hostages given to the residual local pro-American "elites" to calm them down. And which the local peoples partisan themselves, competing in the speed of liquidation except perhaps with the Iskanders. Because these already got everyone.
  2. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 26 September 2015 11: 19 New
    +17
    Thoughts of defeat are already in my head, and that’s good.
    1. dauria
      dauria 26 September 2015 11: 32 New
      +5
      Thoughts of defeat ...


      No, here the MAIN idea is “we’ll go to Russia with a pack”
    2. nikcris
      nikcris 26 September 2015 11: 33 New
      +2
      Judging by his unshaven and wrinkled erysipelas, he did not drink. At the same time, she grinds utter nonsense. So - problems with the brain. Problems with the brain, combined with the desire to immediately pour and drink brings it closer to the ensign from the taiga warehouse. What is there to do with this? But he could become president if he smears coal on his face.
      PS Here again, my connecting words disappeared ... Some kind of haberdashery ...
    3. veksha50
      veksha50 26 September 2015 12: 06 New
      +2
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      Thoughts of defeat are already in my head and this is good.


      The key to our future victory ...
  3. azbukin77
    azbukin77 26 September 2015 11: 19 New
    +1
    4 reason is no one and never won RUSSIAN! ! !
    1. Petr1
      Petr1 26 September 2015 11: 22 New
      0
      AS!!!! and konadtsy at the Olympics ....
    2. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 26 September 2015 11: 25 New
      +4
      Quote: azbukin77
      nobody ever won against RUSSIAN

      Just the same, never and never? smile
      1. dauria
        dauria 26 September 2015 11: 36 New
        +3
        Just the same, never and never?


        Okay, Tsushima doesn't count. The First World War is the king blew, not us. In Korea, this is not our war.
        "eh, we would give them if they caught up with us" smile
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 26 September 2015 11: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: dauria
          In Korea, this is not our war.

          Well, in Korea, as it were, they didn’t quite blow it.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Andrea
          Andrea 26 September 2015 12: 01 New
          -2
          Quote: dauria

          Just the same, never and never?


          Okay, Tsushima doesn't count. The First World War is the king blew, not us. In Korea, this is not our war.
          "eh, we would give them if they would catch us
          Sir. We must be more attentive. Tsushima is not the Russo-Japanese War.
          The 1st World War was leaked by the Lenin-Brest Peace. There was still the Crimean War of 1853, here, perhaps, one can say the tsar blew.
          1. dr.star75
            dr.star75 26 September 2015 12: 48 New
            +6
            You shouldn’t talk about grandfather Lenin in vain ... In February 17, the white collar workers of those times destroyed, among them was almost the entire generals (as under Yanukovych), Lenin was able to make peace, create an army (on February 23 she won her first battle, the RED ARMY of all stronger!) and then drive out not only the Germans, but also the remaining invaders from all over the country.
            1. andrewkor
              andrewkor 26 September 2015 14: 42 New
              0
              There was a discussion at the VIZh about the birthday of the Russian Army on February 23, there was no victory over Narva. It was simply the date of the creation of new military structures instead of the previous army. Ivan the Terrible issued a decree on the creation of a streltsy army. The sailors dug up their decrees, their submariners, the pilots also made a fuss . All hunt to be with an ancient pedigree
          2. Slobber
            Slobber 26 September 2015 12: 54 New
            0
            Tsushima is not a Russian-Japanese war

            Tsushima, she was on another planet.
            Lenin-Brest Peace merged the 1st World War.

            If not the world.
            There was still the Crimean War of 1853, here, perhaps, we can say, the king blew.

            Yeah, the king is generally a left dude who has nothing to do with Russia.
            1. Andrea
              Andrea 26 September 2015 13: 26 New
              -3
              The comment was the answer: "Tsushima is not considered", which means that the Russo-Japanese War is not considered?
              Lenin set up a revolution and saved it, and therefore himself too. (Do not be a revolution, how would everything turn out?)
              The Tsar of All Russia dude is not left, but was responsible for everything that is done in Russia, like the president.
              War is won by generals, losers are rulers.
              1. Manul
                Manul 26 September 2015 13: 51 New
                +4
                Quote: Andrea
                Lenin made a revolution

                Sorry what? Are you talking about which one? Nothing that before the October Revolution has already taken place 2 revolutions? And not so much that the "bloodthirsty" Ilyich came and shoved the tsar-priest from the throne. So I support the previous speakers - don’t touch Lenin’s grandfather.
      2. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 26 September 2015 12: 00 New
        +20
        I understand the minus, it’s hard to realize this, but we raked just when we were reclining on the bed of past great victories. And in the Crimean War they did not depart from the triumph of the Patriotic War of 1812 and foreign campaigns, they ceased to modernize the army. Russian-Japanese simply underestimated some Asians there, too, by the way, after quite successful Russian-Turkish wars. Therefore, we must not forget history and think that if we won the Second World War, then we do not care. The nose must be kept in the wind and be prepared for the machinations of eternal friends.
        1. andrewkor
          andrewkor 26 September 2015 14: 43 New
          +2
          There was still a small victorious Russian-Chinese war of 1900.
        2. nikcris
          nikcris 27 September 2015 21: 41 New
          0
          Since when have Jews become Asians? Ever since Moses brought them there? They hung like shit in an ice hole for many millennia.
  4. cosmos111
    cosmos111 26 September 2015 11: 20 New
    +15
    1-m MAIN, the presence of the Russian Federation, a powerful nuclear patent ...

    hypersonic maneuvering nuclear warhead that flies along an unpredictable trajectory for the enemy and capable of overcoming any missile defense system, the latest development of the Academician V.P. State Rocket Center Makeeva ...
    the product is called "High-speed maneuvering combat unit" .... composition: instrument, modular and combat compartments; aerodynamic guards ...
    the development is intended to equip strategic missile systems of land and sea based and the destruction of strategic enemy targets in conditions of counteraction of the layered missile defense system ...
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 26 September 2015 15: 33 New
      +1
      Such warheads on the ICBM Liner will put.
  5. ziqzaq
    ziqzaq 26 September 2015 11: 21 New
    +8
    For NATO, there is only one reason not to lose - not to go against Russia. What unfortunately is unrealistic today ....
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 26 September 2015 12: 05 New
      +4
      cosmos111 (6
      1-m MAIN, the presence of the Russian Federation, a powerful nuclear patent ...
      Right! And this one
      hypersonic maneuvering nuclear warhead that flies along an unpredictable trajectory for the enemy and capable of overcoming any missile defense system, the latest development of the Academician V.P. State Rocket Center Makeeva ...
      the product is called "High-speed maneuvering combat unit" ....
      This is really a real balm for the soul for the Russians! Well done rocket men!
      But this is not enough!
      Gen. Hodges says PRACTICAL things of OPERATIONAL (!) Significance for any war. And the Russian side and its allies his military OFFERS would also be nice to take for implementation for the combat readiness of the Russian Federation to repulse enemy strikes.
  6. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 26 September 2015 11: 21 New
    0
    The invasion of two hundred languages ​​seems to have already been.
  7. aszzz888
    aszzz888 26 September 2015 11: 21 New
    +1
    Well, not warriors, these mericatos, especially with us !!!
    Let him dig in, and give a dozen reasons. wassat
  8. Gorjelin
    Gorjelin 26 September 2015 11: 21 New
    0
    Hodges: There are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia


    Read this: “Give me more money, more, more. Otherwise Russia will boo boo boo ...
  9. BDRM 667
    BDRM 667 26 September 2015 11: 24 New
    +5
    And the rest, 3 333 330 reasons, where is he doing?



    Here you are, paper, write ...
  10. gelezo47
    gelezo47 26 September 2015 11: 26 New
    +1
    Three reasons are not enough. Much has not yet been voiced. And the fact that he does not engage in self-deception is good! ... soldier
  11. Mantykora
    Mantykora 26 September 2015 11: 26 New
    +11
    Quote: azbukin77
    4 the reason is that no one has ever won a RUSSIAN! ! !

    Well, actually won, do not need URA-patriotism.

    But the main reason why NATO will lose to Russia is the lack of unity of command, the authority of the commander in chief. There are many NATO members, everyone quietly hates the main thing - the United States. In the event of a conflict, part of NATO members will either refuse to participate, or switch to Russia. A splayed five-point fist never won, and NATO is such a five-point.
    1. tomket
      tomket 26 September 2015 11: 35 New
      +3
      Quote: Mantykora
      lack of unity of command

      Yes, they will be quickly let down under the appointed American general. Even there will be no objections. In the event of war, the main threat to NATO is the consistent removal of allies from the list of this very NATO by defeating their "national" units. There are many examples in history, as countries bravely fight to the first defeat. You can recall the "honorable" surrender of France. And about Finland who fought exactly before the start of the Soviet offensive. And about Romania and Bulgaria and Italy.
    2. Black Colonel
      Black Colonel 26 September 2015 11: 36 New
      +5
      Each member of NATO will not want to become a separate pile of ashes in the name of American democracy - that is the main reason. belay belay belay
    3. BDRM 667
      BDRM 667 26 September 2015 12: 01 New
      +2
      Quote: Mantykora
      In the event of a conflict, part of NATO members will either refuse to participate, or switch to Russia.


      Based on the history of WWII, it can be assumed that, yes, part of NATO members will fight anyhow, but there can be no talk of "turning over to the side of Russia."

      Remember the Slovaks ...
    4. nikcris
      nikcris 26 September 2015 12: 10 New
      +1
      There are examples in history. The Warsaw Pact was the same ball of Udi-Udi. Ceausescu simply sent Brezhnev to Prague. So he took and sent and there was NOTHING for him for this. As there was no Romania for Odessa and Stalingrad - so who is more tolerant?
  12. pexotinec
    pexotinec 26 September 2015 11: 30 New
    +1
    The most important point is weakness in the back seat. They are only in the social. Networks are all heroes.
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 26 September 2015 19: 37 New
      0
      Quote: pexotinec
      The most important point is weakness in the back seat. They are only in the social. Networks are all heroes.

      And in Hollywood movies ...
  13. nord62
    nord62 26 September 2015 11: 30 New
    +5
    No, the main factor is your money. A soldier who fights for money cannot win. The Slavs always fought for their homeland, and you, NATO, have always fought for those who pay you! This is the main reason! And the Second World War in Europe is a show off: both the French and Poles and others very quickly adapted to live under Hitler (just look at the chronicle of those years). and only in the USSR they hated and destroyed you by all means. angry
    You NATO members are just hucksters! Is this your name! laughing
    1. tomket
      tomket 26 September 2015 11: 46 New
      +5
      Quote: nord62
      A soldier who fights for money cannot win.

      The French in 40 seem to have also fought for the fatherland. Nevertheless, their consciousness somehow quickly reformed and soon all those who joined de Gaulle were considered criminals and deserters.
      1. Sergej1972
        Sergej1972 26 September 2015 22: 07 New
        0
        There was a terrible disorientation. After all, Marshal Peten was the national hero of the country. And in support of the surrender of France, and for cooperation with Germany, many of the not the most stupid and not the most cowardly Frenchmen spoke out.
  14. const72
    const72 26 September 2015 11: 32 New
    +4
    He thought he would say something wise, and he is for technical equipment. Technique is a very important thing, but even more important are the people who will manage this technique and endure all the "hardships and hardships".
  15. demo
    demo 26 September 2015 11: 34 New
    +2
    There is always a certain requirement in our history.
    At first we wait when they hit us, and then we answer.
    Those. for Russians, any war becomes liberating.
    And this is one of the main incentives that provide further victory.
    This is what the general must remember.
    Everything else is nonsense.
  16. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 26 September 2015 11: 36 New
    +1
    Quote: Mantykora
    Well, actually won, do not need URA-patriotism.

    Separate fights - yes, but the final battle always ended in favor of Russia.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 26 September 2015 11: 45 New
      +2
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      Separate fights - yes, but the final battle always ended in favor of Russia.

      What, and Russian-Japanese 1904-05 won the final battle? And Crimean 1854?
      1. dudinets
        dudinets 27 September 2015 09: 04 New
        0
        How long did the enemy use the fruits of their victory on a historical scale?
        and Peter took Narva, and the Japanese cry over Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. and what Europe gave the capture of Sevastopol (after 11 months of the siege) still do not understand.
  17. Lenin
    Lenin 26 September 2015 11: 40 New
    +3
    It is not necessary to talk here, but to carefully analyze what the general is talking about.
  18. tyras85
    tyras85 26 September 2015 11: 42 New
    0
    There are 100 reasons why NATO will “lose” RUSSIA. Most importantly, we do not accept "shepherds".
    RUSSIA, you are not a herd, BUT a mighty NUCLEAR power! Want to check !? I ask ... What will remain of "your"
    Texas ..! ?? (and it’s not your comment) Run into the mountain-desert climate zone. Enough of PROVOCATIONS!
    Amerikosy ....
  19. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 26 September 2015 11: 43 New
    +4
    And still trying to convince everyone that they are not AGGRESSORS! am
  20. flyer8
    flyer8 26 September 2015 11: 50 New
    +1
    Hodges is clearly short-sighted. smile
    It would not hurt the Americans to study the history of Russia and the reviews of Otto Von Bismarck, for example.
  21. roskot
    roskot 26 September 2015 11: 50 New
    0
    And in their head are cockroaches and the thought in the back of the war.
  22. nikcris
    nikcris 26 September 2015 11: 51 New
    0
    Quote: dauria
    Just the same, never and never?


    Okay, Tsushima doesn't count. The First World War is the king blew, not us. In Korea, this is not our war.
    "eh, we would give them if they caught up with us" smile

    Tsushima is considered - now not only Sakhalin, but ALL the Kuril Islands of Russia.
    World War I ended with the crushing defeat of Germany and the enthralling victory of the Entente. They just didn’t tell you about this, apparently.
    KimIrSen and the "volunteers" of Mao fought in Korea. There were few pilots from the USSR. Stalin was initially opposed. As a result, there was a KIM-MAO-UN clash in Korea. At the same time, Mao NaF did not give up this crazy war.
  23. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 26 September 2015 11: 52 New
    0
    It turns out that NATO has not worked out cooperation at all. Obviously, only one acronym for NATO can scare a potential adversary. Then the question is, what the hell rocking on Russia, and besides completely ignoring the so-called "Russian spirit".
    1. flyer8
      flyer8 26 September 2015 11: 58 New
      +2
      Just hysteria from understanding their powerlessness. They have a real mess in the army. The only thing they succeeded in was lies, PR, propaganda. The concept of patriotism for them, in principle, does not exist, since there is no such nation. This is just a runaway rabble with inferiority complexes.
  24. PValery53
    PValery53 26 September 2015 11: 58 New
    +1
    Do not forget, general: whoever starts, he loses. "Do not be dashing while it is quiet." Where we endure, you will stumble.
  25. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 26 September 2015 11: 59 New
    +2
    When they disconnect the Internet from them .... We’ll wet it! Stupidly and without looking .. Arabs were also accustomed ... (it’s not in vain that we mute mobile phones, etc. ...) No need to get used to them!
  26. Abbra
    Abbra 26 September 2015 11: 59 New
    +1
    General! There are a hundred reasons. You just don’t know how to count!
    1. Abbra
      Abbra 26 September 2015 12: 47 New
      +2
      And what stsuka set me a minus? Hodges really does not know how to count. The 99th reason, for example, is WE RUSSIANS.
      1. katalonec2014
        katalonec2014 26 September 2015 13: 48 New
        +1
        I also noticed, probably "friends visited" corrected as I could.
      2. Manul
        Manul 26 September 2015 13: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: Abbra
        The 99th reason, for example, is WE RUSSIANS.

        Russians, Yuri! hi Russians!
  27. bashmak
    bashmak 26 September 2015 12: 03 New
    +5
    I read the comments, I became ashamed! WE WIN, WE LOSE ... PEOPLE - WAR IS NOT A GAME. THESE TENS, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF LIFE, DESTINIES. IF WE WIN A BATTLE THAT WE WIN! And you won! casino
  28. Rossiyanin
    Rossiyanin 26 September 2015 12: 03 New
    0
    Yes, that you are a general, you have forgotten the real reason for your loss - it is characteristic of Westerners cowardice! hi
  29. novel68rus
    novel68rus 26 September 2015 12: 13 New
    -1
    there is another reason .. this is animal love for their homeland which no one has .. soldier
  30. roskot
    roskot 26 September 2015 12: 16 New
    +3
    And the main reason - as Bismarck said - do not fight with the Russians ...
  31. krot_tank
    krot_tank 26 September 2015 12: 18 New
    +4
    In short - Again, the signalmen are to blame! As they say - If nakosyachil, bring everything to the signalmen. May God not be able to otmazatsya.
  32. Oman 47
    Oman 47 26 September 2015 12: 24 New
    +1
    Dushka no.

    From an EQUAL adversary, the response will arrive not weak.
  33. Yurmix
    Yurmix 26 September 2015 12: 28 New
    +1
    Wake up the bits for no reason. This is not cheers patriotism, it is a praise to engineers developing electronic warfare systems, BZHRK, and other weapons systems. The Yankees only have to yap out of the gateway.
  34. Kopeikin
    Kopeikin 26 September 2015 12: 33 New
    +3
    "Hodges: There are 3 reasons why NATO could lose to Russia"
    Offhand, I will name three reasons for the defeat for everyone:
    1) significant military successes of NATO forces in a hypothetical conflict with Russia. For example: the death of the Black Sea / Baltic Fleet + the loss of Belarus and Ukraine. As a result, the probability of using nuclear weapons by Russia increases to 100%;
    2) significant military successes of the RF Armed Forces against NATO. Example: the defeat and loss of Poland and Romania (I’m not talking about the Baltic States at all negative ) As a result, the probability of using US nuclear weapons increases to 100%;
    3) in case of military failures, both on the one hand and on the other hand, there is a possibility of interference by additional players / countries. It also does not bode well, as these players can play on either one or the other. Bottom line: growing conflict.
    I hope these things are understood on both sides and will not be brought to a hot phase, because I want to look at the successes of our children and the birth of grandchildren.
  35. dr.star75
    dr.star75 26 September 2015 12: 55 New
    +1
    The main reason: While the Russian soldier has: cartridges, matches, moonshine, suck the NATO soldiers lollipop, the Pentagon trembles with fear. Such a poem was sent to me on February 23. smile
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 26 September 2015 22: 05 New
      +2
      This is just a rhyme, and not the smartest.
    2. PValery53
      PValery53 27 September 2015 01: 18 New
      0
      We observe the poetic size, Citizen:
      "While the Russian soldier
      There are bullets, matches, moonshine, -
      Suck ... uh, NATO soldiers,
      Trembling with fear, Pentagon! "
      (The inscription on the rear window of the passenger car is somewhere in
      The Baltic states)
  36. Babai Balkan
    Babai Balkan 26 September 2015 13: 01 New
    +1
    in ancient China, one province unexpectedly attacked the neighboring one, thereby securing a huge advantage in power. The ruler of the defending city ordered the guard to be removed from the walls, and he sat in the open gate and began to play the instrument and sing songs. The enemy grumbled, hesitated and dumped back, without having unraveled the tricks of the defenders.
    So with us ... we pretend to be artless dumbasses, and then bam! .. and the second shift, we’ll definitely give in by the horns.
  37. Oman 47
    Oman 47 26 September 2015 13: 29 New
    0
    Quote: Oman 47
    Dushka no.

    From an EQUAL adversary, the response will arrive not weak.


    Mister anonymous minuser, it is not weakly OPEN to explain, - with what disagree ???!
  38. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 26 September 2015 13: 39 New
    +1
    The main thing in the statement of Hodges-USA is preparing for war with Russia.
    1. kush62
      kush62 27 September 2015 13: 27 New
      0
      olimpiada15 Yesterday, 13:39
      The main thing in the statement of Hodges-USA is preparing for war with Russia.

      Yes, this is no secret. They always prepared. After World War II, they wanted to drop atomic bombs.
      If you were not afraid to get an answer, you might have attacked a long time ago.
  39. Ilya77
    Ilya77 26 September 2015 14: 13 New
    0
    Che called some reasons. But what about the motivation of the fighters, for example, or let’s say the attitude to the loss of civilian life - as soon as bombs and missiles are rained down on NATO countries, all desire will be repelled to fight. Will they be able to rivet planes, tanks, etc., as in the Second World War? how will the numerous migrants in Europe behave in this case? Well, I am silent about nuclear weapons in general, for now this is the main reason for the absence of global wars.
  40. zombiunian
    zombiunian 26 September 2015 14: 16 New
    +2
    and this fagot thought that he was understood by that soldier to whom in the hospital he gave a badge for a severed arm. ))))
  41. vlad7777kul
    vlad7777kul 26 September 2015 15: 00 New
    +1
    I forgot to compare our soldiers with the NATO transgender rushing under a tank with a bunch of grenades.
  42. Crown
    Crown 26 September 2015 15: 04 New
    -1
    Because with Bulgarians, Hungarians, Poles and other shulupony, it is strongly not recommended to go to Russia. Let Bonopart and Hitler ask wassat
  43. Flinky
    Flinky 26 September 2015 15: 12 New
    +1
    Remember, the NATO bastard - there was not yet such a force in the world that would defeat us. And will not be.
  44. avia12005
    avia12005 26 September 2015 17: 04 New
    -1
    The general, and the illiterate, which only in West Point is taught ... There is still the secret weapon of the Russians - someone's mother, and further, who what can ... lol
  45. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 26 September 2015 17: 10 New
    -1
    Their horde, and US!
  46. roskot
    roskot 26 September 2015 17: 43 New
    0
    The first reason is you
    The second reason is you too.
    The lies are all yours
    Unreal dreams.
  47. slaw14
    slaw14 26 September 2015 17: 49 New
    0
    During the conflict in Serbia, NATO troops almost canceled the entire operation and the aircraft carriers did not withdraw for only one reason - the lack of soft toilet paper. This is not my invention, but a fact that, fortunately, was quickly eliminated for them.
  48. mosquit
    mosquit 26 September 2015 18: 26 New
    0
    Strategist, not otherwise ...
    And all the factors are technical / technological ...
    Well, as a result, human conflict - and the lack of technology ...
  49. PValery53
    PValery53 26 September 2015 18: 41 New
    0
    When (and if) trouble comes, all of us in Russia are Russians (United).
  50. znorick
    znorick 26 September 2015 19: 03 New
    0
    There is another factor that Comrade General forgot to mention - the cowardice of NATO warriors, who are able to fight only against wild natives.