Military Review

UVZ: the first contract for T-90MS is expected

49
The first export supply contract for the upgraded tank T-90 MS can be signed before the end of this year, reports TASS a message from Oleg Sienko, general director of Uralvagonzavod.




“The T-90MS tank passed successful tests in one of the Arab countries. I hope to see the conclusion of the first contract for the sale of this car by the end of the year. Which country - until I say. If everything works out, others will follow the first contract, ”said Sienko.

The interest of a number of countries in the Middle East in the acquisition of T-90 was reported at the beginning of the year. The T-90MS — an upgraded version of the T-90 tank — was first shown on the RAE-2011.

In addition, the Director General reported on the Enigma BMP tests planned in the UAE with a Russian combat module.

“The question is now being decided on installing our module on the Enigma BMP and carrying out comprehensive tests at the UAE test sites, which are due to start next year,” said Sienko.

According to him, we are talking about "combat modules with 57-mm cannon, which were created for the Atom BMD jointly with France." However, the French side later withdrew from the project.

The UAE intends to purchase several hundred AU-220М modules from Uralvagonzavod.
Photos used:
Donat Sorokin / TASS
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 26 September 2015 09: 09 New
    +11
    Not a single oil, ALIVE Russia! good
    1. figwam
      figwam 26 September 2015 09: 21 New
      +32
      Not a single oil, ALIVE Russia!

      Yes, but before the appearance of "Almaty", tanks with such protection as on the T-90MS, we do not have in the army.
      1. twviewer
        twviewer 26 September 2015 10: 56 New
        +2
        Quote: figvam
        Yes, but before the advent of "Almaty"

        Or maybe t90ms to get the topology \ picture from the observer through the control center, and crash on the target in automatic mode? and armata can ?? and the distributed control system already exists ??? and you are all iron-iron, 21st century all the same
        1. msm
          msm 26 September 2015 20: 09 New
          +1
          I completely agree. In this regard, still plowing and plowing (the main thing is to wish to do this). But, and iron means a lot!
      2. Tor5
        Tor5 26 September 2015 10: 56 New
        +4
        PR again! Well, was it worth talking about the deal before signing the contract?
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. alekc73
        alekc73 26 September 2015 11: 25 New
        +1
        Armata may be good, but the road is also undeveloped. The T-90MS would be useful to the tank forces of Russia
    2. War and Peace
      War and Peace 26 September 2015 09: 24 New
      +9
      and what can be squeezed out of such a stunted topic as "waiting for a contract"?
      1. MIKHAN
        MIKHAN 26 September 2015 11: 13 New
        +8
        Will wet the bearded ...! Really ... the Urals just do not talk!
      2. captain
        captain 26 September 2015 11: 58 New
        +2
        Greaves can be squeezed out of this topic.
    3. marlin1203
      marlin1203 26 September 2015 13: 29 New
      +3
      The Arabs have nowhere to go. But it can be seen from the experience of military operations in the Middle East that they dopped with their own mind that our armored vehicles are stupidly more reliable, more efficient and cheaper.
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 27 September 2015 10: 21 New
        -1
        But in fact, this T-90MS is still the same seventy-two, with only a small body kit. However, Abrams, Leopard, and Merkava are just as old. Most of all, it is disappointing that we sell the AU-220M guns for export to the right and to the left, and inside the country they are almost banned. For me, so first you should arm your army so that even in the most distant and forgotten garrison there was only the latest generation of equipment - and then sell the previous one. And the latest advanced technology is for internal use only. And not like ours - all the new items for export, and the soldiers serve on the ancient rubbish, which has a place in the open-hearth.
  2. hydrox
    hydrox 26 September 2015 09: 13 New
    +9
    There is nothing special to comment on: if Armata appeared for the RF Armed Forces, then the boch himself ordered the whole world to be queued for the T-90 :: we will earn hundreds of millions by installing modules (upgrading BMPs).
    And please note: just the display of Armata immediately revived tank exports, and since 2011 they have been thinking - will not the country’s leading arms exports show anything more interesting?
    Not shown - here is the result for UVZ!
    1. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 26 September 2015 09: 39 New
      +3
      Quote: hydrox
      then boch himself

      What would a god make a mistake?
      1. Temples
        Temples 26 September 2015 17: 57 New
        +3
        What would a god make a mistake?


        And yourself? wassat

        "Whatever the word Бog do ... "

        Capital letter!
        1. aksakal
          aksakal 26 September 2015 19: 20 New
          +2
          Quote: Temples
          What would a god make a mistake?

          Quote: Temples
          "What would God do ..."

          - and you fight! laughing And you give him back! laughing
    2. Hon
      Hon 26 September 2015 13: 03 New
      0
      Of course, it is necessary to export. but our army would be useful, otherwise now it’s mostly 72, you still have to live to Armata, and in any case the whole Armata park will not replace
    3. Evgeniy667b
      Evgeniy667b 26 September 2015 17: 51 New
      +1
      I apologize, and who is this ... we will earn? Maybe you mean dear hydrox ??? Moreover, collectors at UVZ will receive a little. Most of us are neither hot nor cold. Only tax deductions. And one more question, what except money do you have any thoughts? For example, on strengthening the defense capability of Russia? Or can we only wait for Armata? This is still a cat in a poke.
  3. azbukin77
    azbukin77 26 September 2015 09: 14 New
    +2
    Russian weapons were and are considered the BEST weapons in the world! ! !
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 26 September 2015 09: 59 New
      +2
      What's the point the Houthis are still burning.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 26 September 2015 10: 18 New
        +3
        So the Abrams burn well there. I saw several pictures myself.
        1. DIVAN SOLDIER
          DIVAN SOLDIER 26 September 2015 10: 24 New
          +3
          Well, they popped like peas))
          1. Altona
            Altona 26 September 2015 10: 45 New
            0
            Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
            Well, they popped like peas))

            --------------------
            I would like to see the T-90 in real collisions in order to discard the magazine chatter and virtual ratings ...
            PS Because the tank is really good ... And with inflated ratings, we have already seen the "invincible" Ukrainian "Oplot" ...
  4. APASUS
    APASUS 26 September 2015 09: 14 New
    +6
    Maybe we should have appointed some Arab in the Ministry of Defense, and not Serdyukov? As I recall the scandals with his name, the head of the furniture store is not satisfied with tanks, BMPs and in general all our bad things. And he picked up the dunties for the team who sang along constantly ... ..........
    1. Tjeck
      Tjeck 26 September 2015 09: 29 New
      -2
      Rogozin, too, would not hurt to change his workplace, for some reason everyone forgets that he often shone with Serdyukov in the good old ... Now, on the wave of patriotism, he began to PR where necessary and where not.
      1. fox21h
        fox21h 26 September 2015 09: 45 New
        +5
        Quote: Tjeck
        Rogozin, too, would not hurt to change his workplace, for some reason everyone forgets that he often shone with Serdyukov in the good old ... Now, on the wave of patriotism, he began to PR where necessary and where not.

        He was supposed to be holy with him for work.
        1. Tjeck
          Tjeck 26 September 2015 10: 11 New
          +3
          sorry and what do you mean should? if you are serious, then in this case it was he who should have attracted the attention of the organs in time to the hamster Serdyukov. you do not count them there as fish with a 5 second memory .. in the state apparatus, everyone knows everything about everyone, I know this not by hearsay, since my grandmother worked in the regional party committee and I heard gossip as a child every time I stayed with her - the more that and the current backbone has been sitting there since the late 80s.

          tell me: is the main criterion * of a politician / civil servant for you is populism?
          1. CAMS
            CAMS 26 September 2015 15: 46 New
            -1
            Your "sorry" smells like 5-columns
      2. nemec55
        nemec55 26 September 2015 09: 58 New
        +4
        Rogozin made it clear in his interview that he would not hait Serdyuk, like God is his judge (but his relationship with him was not very simple) so it is not necessary to smear Rogozin under the guise of virtue.
        1. Tjeck
          Tjeck 26 September 2015 10: 17 New
          -2
          God is the judge for all of us, but did the god return 3 pianerin lard, where is that money? if it is impossible to return, then let them at least show us who is sitting for this crime ..
          1. CAMS
            CAMS 26 September 2015 15: 52 New
            -1
            It will be easier for you to go to the pot if shown. Like Saltykov-Shchedrin said that in a hundred years in Russia they will drink and steal.
        2. Amurets
          Amurets 26 September 2015 10: 23 New
          +2
          Moreover, in the East, he holds everything firmly in his capabilities.
      3. tomket
        tomket 26 September 2015 10: 50 New
        +3
        Quote: Tjeck
        for some reason everyone forgets that he often shone with the good old Serdyukov ... Now, in the wake of patriotism, he began to PR where he needed and where he didn’t.

        Is Serdyukov in disgrace? Even Vasiliev was rehabilitated. And why shouldn't Rogozin and the Hero of Russia make a photo? And the opinion of the people all do not care for a long time.
    2. Altona
      Altona 26 September 2015 10: 48 New
      +3
      Quote: APASUS
      Maybe we should have appointed some Arab in the Ministry of Defense, and not Serdyukov?

      -------------------
      Serdyukov was Zubkov's son-in-law, he was married to his daughter Yulia ... If it had not been for divorcing her, then nothing would have happened ...
      1. APASUS
        APASUS 26 September 2015 23: 19 New
        0
        Quote: Altona
        Serdyukov was Zubkov's son-in-law, he was married to his daughter Yulia ..

        Perhaps this was his only merit laughing laughing laughing
  5. oberon 1
    oberon 1 26 September 2015 09: 20 New
    +3
    You need to make tanks and massively like other weapons.
  6. dFG
    dFG 26 September 2015 09: 21 New
    +7
    It would be nice for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to produce a thousand of which until the armature is brought to a series
    1. hydrox
      hydrox 26 September 2015 09: 29 New
      +1
      Quote: dfg
      while the armature will be brought to a series


      Everything has its time ...
    2. Wayna qhapaq
      Wayna qhapaq 26 September 2015 09: 59 New
      +1
      If we drive into factories thousands of effective managers and economists, designers, merchandisers and other "eers" released by our education system recently and train them in plumbing and work on machine tools, then of course we will release them. The average age of workers at military-industrial complex plants is ~ 50 years, and young intelligent engineers under 30 are only a few. PJSC "Arsenyevskaya Aviation Company" PROGRESS "in Primorye - next year only for export an order for 50 helicopters, not counting those for the native Air Force. There is really no one to do.
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 26 September 2015 09: 53 New
    0
    Tanks are undoubtedly an important element of the army's armament, but you need to think about aviation, and about artillery, and ships and missiles and helicopters ... The more tanks you buy from us, the cheaper it will cost our army to produce them for its own rearmament. And with rearmament, 72 will be released for modernization, and again for subsequent sale. Oh, it was not for nothing that tank biathlon was started!
  8. Rus62
    Rus62 26 September 2015 09: 57 New
    0
    Tag-and-il !!!
  9. roskot
    roskot 26 September 2015 09: 58 New
    +2
    The tractor factories must be revived. Volgogradsky is standing, Vladimirsky too, Lipetsk one building without filling. That's where the potential is. And the tanks will be the rest of the line of armored vehicles.
    1. Wayna qhapaq
      Wayna qhapaq 26 September 2015 10: 24 New
      +5
      Hohloblyadam again gave a discount on gas, and some factories of the military-industrial complex in the Far East are still without gas (they promised to build a branch in 2015). As they say, the fish rots from the head. Vorye - Serdyukov, Vasilyeva, etc. etc. on the loose. I wouldn't be surprised if Gaizer is released under an amnesty. And the common people look at the whole thing and draw conclusions.
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 26 September 2015 10: 35 New
        +2
        Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
        And ordinary people look at the whole thing and draw conclusions

        So .. "common people," say ..

        Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
        How about making friends with Linux (http://rfremix.ru/)? Why do we need civilian this specialized system. Just try on a virtual machine for general development - no more

        Krymchanka, daughter of an officer?

        "Simple people" .. phe .. negative
        1. Wayna qhapaq
          Wayna qhapaq 26 September 2015 10: 46 New
          0
          Believe me, you have never been to Crimea. What's wrong with RFRemix?
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 26 September 2015 12: 31 New
            0
            Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
            Do you believe my friend

            - my friends are different ..
            - to you - to relatives (we are not relatives, see above)
            - mow under the "common people" and remember at the same time RFRemix - not comme il faut

            IMHO, yes wink
            1. Wayna qhapaq
              Wayna qhapaq 26 September 2015 14: 14 New
              0
              Comil'fo blow your nose down your sleeve and play the balalaika cat Are you ours?
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 26 September 2015 15: 51 New
                0
                Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
                Comme il faut blow your nose

                You know, I believe ..

                Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
                and play the balalaika

                You can’t argue lol

                Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
                you are our cat

                Not yours, but your own .. walk, Vasya ..
      2. tomket
        tomket 26 September 2015 10: 52 New
        +2
        Quote: Wayna Qhapaq
        . And ordinary people look at the whole thing and draw conclusions.

        And what are the conclusions of the people? Rather, the conclusions that he had already made a long time, that's just the point of these conclusions?
        1. Wayna qhapaq
          Wayna qhapaq 26 September 2015 10: 53 New
          0
          Is it a rhetorical question? The main thought is to cheat. Nurgal ..., ugh Serdyukov allowed.
  10. donavi49
    donavi49 26 September 2015 10: 07 New
    +1
    What a secret he is. Everyone knows that under the Arab country - Kuwait. Where the tank was tested.
    https://youtu.be/XBpSjEFr_V0
  11. Maksus
    Maksus 26 September 2015 10: 23 New
    +2
    And what are we planning to buy? T72B3? Which is even inferior to the usual 90? Armata is still far away, even military tests were not, and after all after them it is only possible to begin the elimination of shortcomings, and any equipment always has them. We still need new, well-protected machines.
    1. tomket
      tomket 26 September 2015 10: 54 New
      +2
      Quote: Maksus
      T72B3? Which is even inferior to the usual 90?

      Now the patriots will run over and throw you their hats. Like we need a massive tank which is B3. But there are no denyushek on the MS, and the B3 is dispensed with and tankers are still being beaten up.
  12. DMB3000
    DMB3000 26 September 2015 10: 34 New
    0
    Quote: ia-ai00
    Not a single oil, ALIVE Russia! good

    oil gives Russia 30% of the currency. even less now. the Saudis receive 90% of their currency from oil. and no one blames them for this. on the contrary, they elevate them (the Americans).
  13. Crown
    Crown 26 September 2015 12: 07 New
    +2
    Quote: saturn.mmm
    Quote: hydrox
    then boch himself

    What would a god make a mistake?

    God is capitalized.
  14. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 26 September 2015 14: 56 New
    0
    Most importantly, all our T-72 and T-90s should be upgraded, without waiting for the new T-90MS, to their level. On the T-72, at least unify the weapon, communications, engine.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 26 September 2015 16: 50 New
      -1
      Quote: Zaurbek
      On the T-72 at least a gun to unify

      What’s wrong with the gun? Or did I sleep and just woke up ??

      I remind you:

      - T90 has a "deep upgrade" T-72
      - T90MS .. well, understand laughing

      So what's with the gun on the T-72?
  15. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 26 September 2015 17: 43 New
    0
    The guns are different, the gun on the MC is like that of the Armata with a longer BPS and with a greater shot energy. Accordingly, with a large breakout. And the caliber is the same 125 mm. And an automatic charger for a new projectile.
  16. avia1991
    avia1991 27 September 2015 00: 31 New
    +1
    Hopefully, by the end of the year, the first contract for the sale of this machine will be announced. Which country - until I say.
    And it would seem that it would be much more logical: "IT WILL BE ANNOUNCED ON THE PURCHASE OF A LOT OF T-90 MS of the Ministry of Defense of the RF Armed Forces."