Why Russia has the right to inflict airstrikes on the positions of bandits in Syria

It is already no secret to anyone that in Syria Russia is modernizing the Basel Assad airport, as well as several other transport and logistics facilities. In the province of Hama, we opened the first field camp for refugees from neighboring provinces. The volume of military goods for the Syrian army fighting the terrorists and humanitarian aid to the residents of a war-torn Syria is increased.


In principle, in parallel with Russia, Iran began to take similar steps. In June, simultaneously with the increase in the number of flights of the Russian Syrian Express, the Iranians began to modernize a military airfield in the province of Homs, erected a hospital and a number of infrastructure facilities, and also increased the volume of military cargo and humanitarian aid.

However, the hysterical reaction of the United States thundered only now, and only on the actions of Russia. Why she was so late - here is an interesting question for detailed consideration.

The intensification of Iranian assistance did not prevent the signing of agreements on the Iranian nuclear program. Yes, in principle, no one notices (except for Israel, concerned about the strengthening of pro-Iranian Hezbollah). Although against the background of fragmentary and controversial evidence of participation in hostilities of Russian military advisers - participation in the battles of the IRGC (the Corps of Guardians of the Islamic Revolution) is almost no one hiding. This means that Iran’s involvement in the great Middle Eastern war is quite acceptable for the United States, and perhaps even desirable.

The statement of General Breedlove that the United States, they say, do not know what the true plans of Russia in Syria are is nonsense. The fact that Russia's goal is to destroy terrorists and restore Syria’s statehood is known from the very beginning of the conflict. Russian military assistance to Syria did not start today. The United States has come to terms with it and is making its plans to further destabilize the region with its account. The summer intensification of deliveries to Syria and the activity of Russian specialists simply could not go unnoticed, as military intelligence reports are placed on the JCS table (Joint Chiefs of Staff - Joint Chiefs of Staff - the highest planning authority of the US military) - daily. Consequently, either the American bureaucratic system is frighteningly slow, or in the beginning of September something happened that the Americans could not foresee. If we proceed from the second option, then in order to understand what could have happened - let us consider the current situation in more detail.

To begin with, it is worth noting that the prevailing opinion among the broad masses that the war of “all against all” is going on in the Middle East conflict is wrong. Observers are confused by the huge number of armed parties to the conflict, acting as if independently. And the external lack of unified governing bodies in already established coalitions. Although one of the coalitions has such an organ for a long time - this is the military-political leadership of the United States, which has very successfully unleashed the Syrian war and skillfully conducts its expansion to the maximum geographical limits.

Another widely held belief that the emergence of the Islamic State (IG) - a consequence of American incompetence - should be considered controversial. The theory of the escalation of armed conflicts has long been studied and finalized by American military science. On its basis, all program documents and directives related to the sphere of foreign policy and national security of the USA are built. That is, when the Americans systematically and steadily increase the long-known factors leading to the aggravation of contradictions, destabilization, and then to the expansion of the conflict in any corner of the world - they simply cannot help but know what they are doing.

For clarity. The most elementary and elementary factor, which unambiguously leads to escalation, is the supply of resources (including weapons) the weak side of the conflict. What is in Libya, that in Syria, the Americans methodically pumped weapons and other material and informational support for gangsters who initially had no chance to oppose government forces. Further, in order to increase their motivation and stamina in battle, American specialists and agents strengthened the second element in the ranks of the original criminals — the ideological base. The fact that the best base in local conditions is the idea of ​​Jihad was understood by the Americans even when they needed to organize a widespread opposition to OXV in Afghanistan. And therefore, to transform the criminal substrate into a force capable of dumping the secular regimes of Libya and Syria, the United States routinely used Jihad propaganda. At the same time, it is very doubtful that the Americans seriously hoped that the jihadists would later disappear somewhere or re-educate themselves in favor of democracy and the "values ​​of the civilized world." And it does not even matter that the radicals, who are trained in the Jordanian and Turkish camps by American instructors, consider America their main enemy. Those who created this problem at home should spend their material and human resources to fight the problem created by the Americans. That is, the calculation is on the escalation of the conflict, on drawing new participants into it. This is what happens. Where is the incompetence here?

Let's see what kind of coalition the United States was able to put together to promote its interests in the Middle East. No, it's not about the "coalition to fight the IG." This is about the common interests that create coalitions. Interests are tactical and strategic. The maximum common interests in this war are only two. The first is a change in the balance of power prevailing in the region before the war. The second is the restoration of this balance.

The United States began its game for the transformation of the region. It seems to be something better or fairer. Future interested parties have even been shown the desired result - a map of the Greater Middle East (BBI). Well, in fact, it is impossible to start a big mess without a visible image of how “how good it will be later.” So you will not find any allies. And the Americans have drawn such an “image”. But for us it will be interesting not how much this picture will coincide with reality after a certain time, and not how much Americans have been sly by drawing this picture. We are interested in a vector, or rather, a process launched in the south of the Eurasian continent. And there is a great suspicion that the initiators themselves are also more interested in the process. And this process is called - power (passing through armed struggle) transformation of a political map. The result of this transformation is not predictable in principle, but it promises to be long and absorb all the resources of the countries involved in the process.

Many forces joined the process with excitement. First of all, the radical Sunni sects, who dream of recreating the Caliphate and gaining power, if not over the whole world, then on a considerable part of it. If someone else remembers, the current world scarecrow - the IG - has grown out of the offended American invasion of Iraq of the Sunni minority, which was in power under Saddam. Initially, Sunni sects and groups actively fed the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, which, of course, did not want to lose their hereditary power, but only hoped to seriously hit growing Iran and its associated Shiite communities in many states of the region. Turkey hoped to greatly increase its influence, and at the same time solve the Kurdish problem. Apparently, Erdogan was shown another BBI map, drawn specially for him, saying, "this treasure map is for suckers, and we will show you the real one."

All other American "partners", such as European countries or Australia - do not play any noticeable role in this conflict. This is a crowd for voting in the UN and creating the appearance of universal support for American initiatives. Nobody asked their opinions, and they were connected to the process in a notification procedure.

The most motivated and efficient part of the American coalition are all bandit groups fighting for political reorganization of the region. Actually, it would not make sense to sort out the “grades” of bandits, because their strategic interest coincides. To classify them according to the degree of “moderation” or radicalism — almost senseless — they all fight for a place under the sun in a future Islamic state. The fact that the groups periodically fight with each other should not be deceiving - all of them will sooner or later merge and swear to the IG. After all, there are no ideological differences between the IG, Jabhat al-Nusra, the Islamic Front Coalition or Jaish al-Hurr (it’s also the Free Syrian Army). That is why it is ridiculous to hear about the American struggle against the IS, because it is just the most successful of the US allies, the most productively solving the American task of redrawing the political map.

Now about the second coalition. It seems to be no. There are forces interested in stopping the bloody alteration of the world. This is not only the legitimate government of Syria.

First of all, this is Russia. It is Russia that has an interest both in its own peaceful and progressive development, and in the preservation of peace throughout the Eurasian continent. We were quite happy with the independent Ukraine - until they made a bridgehead for an “onslaught to the East”. Theoretically, we would even have nothing against the IG, if this formation had cooled, acquired shape and stopped its expansion in all directions. In the most paradoxical way, we are constantly credited with some kind of bloodthirsty, aggressive plans, but it is we who actually have the most real potential in the future to become the guarantor of the peaceful development of the Eastern Hemisphere of the planet. After the USA turned into a global factor of instability, the post of the guarantor of the world became vacant. And most likely, such a “dislike” for us, on the part of the former hegemon, is connected precisely with an understanding of this circumstance. According to the sum of natural and historical circumstances, Russia can become much more preferable for the whole world as a guarantor of peace and stability.

Another member of the coalition, as we have already noted at the very beginning, is Iran, which from the very beginning of the conflict, like Russia, has been helping the legitimate Syrian authorities in the fight against bandits. Like Russia, Iran is well aware that it should become one of the next targets for US policy aimed at the bloody transformation of all states that have the audacity to progressively develop in their own interests. At the same time, in the American plans, Iran was given its place - the place of the leader of the Shiite groups in the big Sunni-Shiite war. During the occupation of Iraq, the Americans did not interfere with the pro-Iranian Mahdi Army to arrange a showdown with the Sunni factions that have now become IS. Iran’s participation in the war in Yemen (the underbelly of Saudi Arabia), as well as the assistance of the IRGC to the Assad troops - as we noted above - did not prevent the lifting of sanctions. Iran was necessary to maintain and expand the conflict - as fuel for the fire. But now, when the coordination of actions between the troops of Bashar Assad, Iran and Russia is becoming obvious, everything has changed. Iran is no longer an independent player, like Turkey, hooked on its regional ambitions.

Separately, it should be said about two players.

First, about Israel. This player is much more interested in the peace and tranquility of the region - it is a matter of his physical survival in a hostile environment. This player will never join any coalition (especially with Iran containing Lebanese Hezbollah), and will always rely only on himself. But with Russia, Israel, from the very beginning of the Syrian conflict, has had unofficial coordination through the special services. See the visits to Moscow of Benjamin Netanyahu and the Chief of General Staff of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Lieutenant General Gadi Ayzenkot. The strategic interests of Russia and Israel coincide. However, after several episodes when the IDF forces tried to eliminate the threat of the transfer of weapons to Hezbollah in Syrian territory, it would not be superfluous to exchange visions and agree on further actions.

Secondly, it is the Kurds - one of the combat-ready parties to the conflict. At first glance, the strategic interest of the Kurds - the creation of their own state - automatically makes them members of the American coalition. The US has working contacts with part of the Kurdish forces since the Iraq war. Today (to the fury of the Turks) the Kurds receive military assistance from the Americans (admittedly, the Americans often exaggerate it). However, the role of the Kurds in the American plans is similar to the Iranian one - to be the fuel for a fire that should spread to Turkey and Iran. In Iraq, the Kurds have autonomy legally, and in Syria, in fact. The question of Kurdish statehood will almost inevitably be resolved - this must be understood immediately. But another question is what price the state will get to the Kurds. Without real allies, this path will be very difficult.

Today, the Syrian government does not supply the Kurds with arms and supplies and cannot provide legal autonomy without constitutional changes. Only this, until recently, prevented Kurdish troops from joining the coalition of Russia, Syria and Iran. And if the Russian advisers managed to convince Bashar Assad that the time has come to change this situation - the Americans really need to start worrying.

In this configuration, the real anti-terrorist coalition will be under the authority of Russia. And then, as Bashar Jaafari, the Permanent Representative of Syria to the UN, noted, Russia has at least the rights of the United States to strike at terrorists. And if the Americans do not agree with this, then they will have to admit that they are allies of the terrorists, which they really are.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. venaya 27 September 2015 05: 37 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Kurds have always been used for their own purposes. I met with an Armenian, told that during the Armenian massacre, they were driven from the territory of Turkey, in the region of Ararat, namely the Kurds bought by the Turks.
    1. w3554152 27 September 2015 09: 33 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The Armenian woman said and everyone believed.
      1. Kostyar 27 September 2015 09: 57 New
        • 20
        • 0
        +20
        Russia has the right to bomb the positions of militants, if only because the legally elected government asks for it ...?! Well, as they say in spite of enemies to the joy of Mom !!!
        1. Basarev 27 September 2015 11: 01 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          For me, only two questions should be resolved — letting the Kurds create their great Kurdistan and give Israel away to the Arabs — and the whole Middle East batch will decide on its own.
          1. marlin1203 27 September 2015 13: 33 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Israel will choke. Arabs are still warriors laughing
            1. afdjhbn67 27 September 2015 14: 36 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Our sources report that the Chinese will send a J-15 Flying Shark fighter squadron to Syria, some of them will be based on an aircraft carrier, the rest - at the Russian air base near Latakia. The Chinese will also deploy Z-18F anti-submarine helicopters and Z-18J long-range helicopters. In addition, in order to fight terrorists, including ISIS forces, Beijing will send at least 1000 marines to fight shoulder to shoulder with their counterparts from Russia and Iran.

              DEBKAFILE sources indicate that just as Russian marines will be trained to identify immigrants from Chechnya and the Caucasus among militants, Chinese marines will seek out and destroy Uyghur militants from the northern, predominantly Muslim population, Xinjiang province of China.

              Just as Putin has no desire to see the Chechen militants who had returned to Russia, Chinese President Xi wants to prevent that Uighurs returned home from the Syrian battlefield.
              1. veksha50 27 September 2015 16: 34 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: afdjhbn67
                DEBKAFILE sources indicate


                Again this DEBKA is forty ...
          2. Stirbjorn 28 September 2015 13: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And there will be no Kurdistan, the United States has leaked its recent Kurdish allies to please Turkey. Now the Turks are sweeping the Kurds from the rear, periodically, for a look, shooting towards ISIS.
        2. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 13: 03 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Bone
          Russia has the right to bomb the positions of militants, if only because the lawfully elected government asks for it ...?!

          Yanukovych somehow voiced a similar request and at that time he was a completely lawfully elected president, nobody dismissed him from office, and, as a result, there were no creeps, so it’s not so simple tomorrow, he will ask the lawfully elected president to bomb some village and What do you need to agree?
          1. ARS56 27 September 2015 16: 58 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Yanukovosch is still proud that he did not give an order to suppress the anti-government rebellion on the Maidan. He did not ask for anything and did not intend to. He is the same hatskraynik as the bulk of the population of Ukraine. The exception was the residents of the Crimea and Donbas. The anti-Khunt protest in Kharkiv was easily suppressed by the ukrofascist gangs, the Odessans were significantly burned, the rest were practically and not noticeably.
            In Syria, for many years now, the people, led by the president and the joined elia, have heroically fought against the well-armed pro-American formations of all stripes, who are fully assisted by Turkey and deliver targeted attacks on the Syrian troops of Israel.
            1. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 17: 56 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: ARS56
              He did not ask for anything and did not intend to.

              Indeed?
              "Viktor Yanukovych called on Vladimir Putin to use the Russian armed forces to protect the local population in Ukraine.

              Original news InoTV:
              http://russian.rt.com/inotv/2014-03-04/YAnukovich-prosit-Rossiyu-o-vvode
              "
          2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Rus2012 27 September 2015 17: 16 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Bone
          Russia has the right to bomb militant positions

          ... and the Chinese are preparing -
          Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning docked at Tartus port
          27 September 2015
          The aircraft carrier arrived in Tartus without aircraft. Aircraft and helicopters should appear on its take-off deck by mid-November - arriving directly from China via Iran or delivered by giant Russian transporters via Iranian and Iraqi airspace.
          .
          Our sources report that the Chinese will send a J-15 Flying Shark fighter squadron to Syria, some of them will be based on an aircraft carrier, the rest - at the Russian air base near Latakia. The Chinese will also deploy Z-18F anti-submarine helicopters and Z-18J long-range helicopters. In addition, in order to fight terrorists, including ISIS forces, Beijing will send at least 1000 marines to fight shoulder to shoulder with their counterparts from Russia and Iran.

          http://agitpro.su/v-portu-tartus-prishvartovalsya-kitajskij-avianosec-lyaonin/
        4. gav6757 27 September 2015 21: 57 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Russia has the right to bomb when it considers it right !!!
          It's time to unlearn how to ask permission from all sorts of fuckers!
          Russia itself can figure out what to do if it only has smart, adequate people who love their country at the helm!
          I do not mean the current government, led by Medvedev ...
      2. Weyland 27 September 2015 18: 11 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        It has long been known that in addition to the regular Turkish army, the Armenians were genocidal mainly by their Kurdish neighbors (simply because there are almost no Turks in Turkish Armenia), who were simply given permission by the Turks to rob and kill Armenians. It’s just that they don’t write about it so often - it’s politically incorrect ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
  2. Denis DV 27 September 2015 05: 55 New
    • 15
    • 0
    +15
    Exactly! Article + Objectively without snot, as they say - power is in truth!
    1. Observer2014 27 September 2015 08: 30 New
      • 18
      • 0
      +18
      "Why Russia has the right to strike airstrikes on the positions of bandits in Syria"
      Enough of constantly making excuses! It’s time for the Russian leadership to make it a rule, at all press conferences to stop constantly making excuses for something. If you think that you are doing the right thing, do it absolutely without hesitation and excuse!
      Remember the last years, how constantly it’s for “infringing on the rights of perverts,” God forgave me forgiving. And as soon as they do something masculine (I’m talking about our leadership), the impression is that they are now bursting into tears and apologize in advance.
      If they’re right, then they’re right. Stop mumbling.
      1. veksha50 27 September 2015 16: 36 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Observer2014
        If they’re right, then they’re right. Stop mumbling.


        Putin at the UN tomorrow is going to talk specifically about Syria and Russia's actions ...

        However, it is interesting that he gathered and the UN to remind about something:

        "Putin said what he will talk about from the rostrum of the UN General Assembly


        Talking in general terms about his speech, Putin said that he intends to touch upon the history of the United Nations and the question of its further development in modern conditions. “Already now I can say that the decision to create the UN was made just in our country, in the Soviet Union at the Yalta Conference. Soviet Union, Russia, as the successor of the Soviet Union, is the founding country of the United Nations and a permanent member of the Security Council

        Source: http://tehnowar.ru/25000-putin-rasskazal-o-chem-budet-govorit-s-tribuny-genassam
        blei-oon.html
    2. xxxMYSTICxxx 27 September 2015 09: 09 New
      • 17
      • 0
      +17
      Pay attention to how well the Syrians learned Russian, with all the subtleties
      1. Not local 27 September 2015 09: 18 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Sustainable phrase: "OBAMA Ch.M.O." - Recently gaining momentum in popularity around the world.
  3. Revolver 27 September 2015 05: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Article is rubbish starting with a headline. Russia has the right to bomb ISIS simply by the right of the strong. The proof is the lack of attempts to stop the bombing. If there were no forces - the existing interested forces would quickly prove the absence of law. Something like this.
    1. dmi.pris 27 September 2015 07: 06 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      I don’t understand why it’s a minus to a man? This does not contradict our military strategy — the civilian population in the regions controlled by ISIS didn’t have anyway to support these scumbags. So, if agreed with Iran, there is room for pilots to train ..
      Quote: Nagan
      Article is rubbish starting with a headline. Russia has the right to bomb ISIS simply by the right of the strong. The proof is the lack of attempts to stop the bombing. If there were no forces - the existing interested forces would quickly prove the absence of law. Something like this.
    2. Alexander Romanov 27 September 2015 08: 04 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Nagan
      Proof - No Attempts to Prevent Bombing

      Shitty proof, because any attempt to interfere looks like ISIS defense. Fucking strategist your Obama.
    3. Oleg14774 27 September 2015 10: 11 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nagan
      Russia has the right to bomb ISIS just rightfully

      So then it is, but then we will not differ from the amers.
      1. Aleks28 27 September 2015 10: 13 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Oleg147741
        So then it is, but then we will not differ from the amers.

        We will. Russia supports LAW !! The elected head of state. Well, live with wolves, howl like a wolf.
      2. veksha50 27 September 2015 12: 04 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Oleg147741
        So then it is, but then we will not differ from the amers.



        Oleg, then what - do not bomb the troops of this ISIS at all ???

        As there yesterday, the day before yesterday, INOSMI wrote: "Russian airplanes struck with sophisticated accuracy and brutality an air-bomb strike ISIS units ...

        If we don’t help Assad’s troops, then why did we even get in there ???

        A request for help from the legitimate government of Syria was ??? It was !!!
    4. veksha50 27 September 2015 12: 01 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Nagan
      Russia has the right to bomb ISIS simply by the right of the strong. The proof is the lack of attempts to stop the bombing. If there were no forces, the existing interested forces would quickly prove the absence of law.


      Hmm ... But right... It is even more surprising to hear this truth from the lips of a person under the flag of the USA ... hi

      PS Could this phrase sound in the 90s, and even at the beginning of this century ???
  4. Platonich 27 September 2015 06: 09 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Great stuff! Respect to the author. Everything has become more clear about the situation in this fire! In my opinion Syria is far from Dill: it will not betray, as these glorious "brothers".
    1. veksha50 27 September 2015 12: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Platonitch
      In my opinion, Syria is far from Dill: it will not betray, like these glorious "brothers."



      I put you a plus, but do not be seduced by the "friendship" of the Arabs ... they (the Arabs) betrayed the USSR-Russia more than once ...

      Let's be honest: Russia pursues its geopolitical goals, and God forbid to achieve them ...

      We will not achieve our goals - the states will achieve our goals ... Do we need it ??? And so already overlaid the country with traps ...
    2. Sterlya 27 September 2015 20: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Platonitch
      not betray, like these glorious "brothers."

      these "brothers" are already sitting in the liver and crap wassat
      I would be glad to hear about them NEVER
  5. Cat man null 27 September 2015 06: 19 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Quote: Platonitch
    Syria is far from dill: it will not betray how these glorious "brothers"

    Grazing !!

    betray, betray, even as betray .. "East - a delicate matter", and there is such a "salad" now, in this Syria - Ukraine nervously smokes on the sidelines.

    That is the task, on the one hand, to ISIS to kick (preferably, by the hands of the Syrians themselves with minimal support from the Russian army), and on the other, not to let these “friends” grimace ahead of time ..
    1. rotmistr60 27 September 2015 07: 30 New
      • 17
      • 0
      +17
      Grazing !!

      Again a hint of "cheers-patriots" in your opinion? You better tell me when Syria specifically betrayed Russia ?. It is in connection with certain events in the 90s that we lost interest in this region (or this interest was specially erased). My father in the 70s was the so-called Advisor to Syria. The attitude towards the Russians was always excellent. And now, when Russia not only, a couple of years ago, did not allow the United States to bomb Syria, but now it is actively helping betrayal, it’s not worth the wait. Great betrayal are "our" liberal traitors.
      1. Cat man null 27 September 2015 07: 43 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Again a hint of "cheers-patriots" in your opinion?

        Exactly yes

        Quote: rotmistr60
        My father in the 70s was the so-called Advisor to Syria

        With all due respect .. but it was a long time ago, and then there wasn’t a civil war there, too?

        Quote: rotmistr60
        The attitude towards the Russians was always excellent

        I do not argue. But relations between people and state policy are “two big differences”.

        Quote: rotmistr60
        And now, when Russia not only, a couple of years ago, did not allow the United States to bomb Syria, but now it is actively helping betrayal

        Your words, but to God’s ears .. I repeat - "East - a delicate matter." They always, everywhere, in everything - only their interest.

        And there is also the American approach - "the service provided is worth nothing." This is me about "a couple of years ago," yes.

        Quote: rotmistr60
        Great betrayal is distinguished by "our" liberal traitors

        Are these here sideways? Although yes - I do not like them either laughing

        Quote: rotmistr60
        You better tell me when Syria specifically betrayed Russia?

        It depends on what you call "betrayed" ..

        In May 2005, Russia wrote off $ 9,782 billion from Syria's $ 13,4 billion debt to Syria

        It would seem :

        - oil is pumping, there is no war
        - but - we can’t pay our debts .. we are poor, we panim ..

        That's why I say - there are no "friends" there. Only interests.
        1. rotmistr60 27 September 2015 07: 56 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          We will assume that you veiled the previous one with this comment. After all, they have now written what is.
          With all due respect .. but it was a long time ago, and then there wasn’t a civil war there, too?

          Yes, but then there was the father of B. Assad. But politics has remained unchanged.
          1. Cat man null 27 September 2015 08: 07 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: rotmistr60
            you veiled the previous one with this comment

            Oh, wow .. what did i do with him?? belay

            Quote: rotmistr60
            now wrote what is

            Yeah .. and in the previous comment - that which cannot be ruled out as quite probable.

            Assad is now under the hammer and, of course, in this situation he will accept any help. What will happen when he is pushed away from these hammers - only God knows.

            Somehow yes
            1. rotmistr60 27 September 2015 08: 27 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              Why, what did I do with him ??

              Veil - shut up, cover up, darken, shade, shade, throw a cover, hide, hide the Dictionary of Russian synonyms.
              Assad is now under the hammer

              B. Assad under these "hammers", as you put it, sits for four years and at the same time fights against the Islamic State. I want to tell you that it's probably worthless to defend your opinion when it is not objective. All the best.
              Yes, lastly:
              Why, what did I do with him ??

              You are with yourself, not with him.
              1. Cat man null 27 September 2015 08: 47 New
                • -1
                • 0
                -1
                Quote: rotmistr60
                ... Dictionary of Russian synonyms

                Thank you, I know Russian well. The question was what did you mean request

                Quote: rotmistr60
                while fighting with the IG

                .. not particularly successful, as we see ..

                Quote: rotmistr60
                probably sucks to defend their opinion when it is not objective

                Probably. Only in this case - out of place phrase no

                Quote: rotmistr60
                You with yourself, not with him done

                Deep thought .. such that I can’t see it.

                Silly I, probably .. sad

                Quote: rotmistr60
                All the best

                hi
        2. Sterlya 27 September 2015 20: 31 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          in geopolitics, not everything is considered just money, cash. there are lyrics. Yes, in principle, one for the texts. read between the lines
    2. UralMan 27 September 2015 08: 46 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      Water-to-water-to-water ... did you understand that? What to write ...
      The Ukrainian and Syrian conflict is one and the same "American compote" ... What is not clear here, everyone understands
    3. afdjhbn67 27 September 2015 11: 38 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      If you remove the Assad family from the leadership, you will surely betray - it will go to the Americans .. therefore, there is a struggle not for Syria, but for Bashar Assad personally ..
    4. anti-Semite 27 September 2015 13: 53 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      we with this ury somehow lived for 1000 years and broke off far from weak armies of power integrators so by
  6. mivmim 27 September 2015 06: 25 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Why Russia has the right to inflict airstrikes on the positions of bandits in Syria

    Yes, because they are bandits. Correctly the article says
    that Russia's goal is to destroy terrorists and restore Syrian statehood
    .
    1. hydrox 27 September 2015 07: 44 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      It’s just that Putin made a wonderful use of the candle that Obama gave him directly above the net: Obama could not even think that “just rmtorik” could be so deadly. Obama himself called Russia and ISIS the biggest dangers for modern "democracy" and recorded it in an official US document (something about strategy) - and Suddenly one danger (Russia) attacks another danger (ISIS) in order to destroy it.
      LATERAL!
      Victory is guaranteed, Russia needs to be patted on the head and even awarded (apparently, the lifting of sanctions) - there is less danger, the "democracy" does not lose its face in ties with terrorists.
      But something went wrong and now the smoked president is terribly rooting, because with its actions Russia “has beaten the whole raspberries to the Yankees” ... sorry, I broke the entire game in the BV to the Yankees (and, it seems, completely!).
  7. Mainbeam 27 September 2015 07: 00 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Independent Ukraine was quite happy with us - until the bridgehead for the "onslaught on the East" was made of it. Theoretically, we would not even have anything against IS, if this education had cooled down, regained shape and stopped its expansion in all directions.

    With these words, I thought that the article was written by Putin himself :-) also because the article is voluminous and informative, considering the state of serial affairs from all sides, and not just the IS, the USA and Syria. Such an article a couple of months ago, when the confusion began with C-300 for Iran. Article plus.

    Only in the article another player is not affected - China:

    The Arab resource almasdarnews.com reports that the military contingent of the PRC is already on its way to Latakia and will arrive at Syrian ports from day to day. Chinese transport with military cargo was spotted on Tuesday morning passing through the Suez Canal. The information that the Chinese military experts may arrive in Tartus in the coming weeks was confirmed by the commander of the Syrian army.


  8. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 07: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The base for public opinion began to be customized
  9. Barakuda 27 September 2015 07: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Why Russia has the right to inflict airstrikes on the positions of bandits in Syria

    Yes, because finally - RUSSIA! soldierenough to pay attention to the bleating of mongrel sheep.
    1. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 07: 35 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Barracuda
      Yes, because finally - RUSSIA!

      Well, the Americans are justifying their right in the same way, every country will justify its military operations in other countries, chaos will never stop in the world
      1. veksha50 27 September 2015 12: 17 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: rosarioagro
        Well, the Americans are justifying their right in the same way, every country will justify its military operations in other countries, chaos will never stop in the world



        Do you suggest leaving the right strong only to the Americans ???

        And we should only bleat, persuade them and their satellites: "Uncles, do not do this - this is poooooohooo ???" ...

        Russia came to the aid of a friendly state at the request of its legal leadership ... Shtatnikov and the famous coalition from 60 countries, for that matter, no one called, and there was no UN decision to create this military coalition ...

        That is, this coalition can be called "robbery-robbery" under the guise of mercy and help ...
        1. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 18: 05 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: veksha50
          Russia came to the aid of a friendly state at the request of its legitimate leadership ..

          In more detail, when this Syrian government requested military assistance, an official source
          1. veksha50 27 September 2015 20: 33 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: rosarioagro
            In more detail, when this Syrian government requested military assistance, an official source



            I certainly didn’t ask you ... There is an agreement on military-technical cooperation, and who knows what secret annexes are to it ...

            If there wasn’t something like that, then neither our planes nor our marines would be there ...
  10. fa2998 27 September 2015 07: 42 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: Nagan
    Article is rubbish starting with a headline.

    If we take international law, Russia will have the right to attack IS positions, if the Syrian authorities ask for military assistance (conclude an agreement). Now, apparently, this is not happening, there is military-technical cooperation. Moreover, we are talking about objects on the territory Syria, further, we need agreements with other countries. hi RS, Do not be like the Americans, they climb when they do not ask.
  11. Mainbeam 27 September 2015 07: 43 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Kurds are one of the combat-ready parties to the conflict. At first sight, Kurds' strategic interest - creating their own state - automatically makes them members of the American coalition. The United States has had working contacts with part of the Kurdish forces since the Iraq war. Today (to the fury of the Turks) Kurds receive military assistance from the Americans

    I also think that the countries of the Middle East with the military support of the Russian Federation will restore their former borders, destroying the cause of the war - ISIS. Syria will recover to the level of Turkey and Iran. Only with Kurdish (anti) terrorist groups is it not clear - their protracted conflict with the Turks and the absence of their own state. And so - yes, a balanced arming of the conflicting parties with the weapons of the Russian Federation can be a guarantee of stability in the region.

    1. rosarioagro 27 September 2015 07: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: MainBeam
      And so - yes, a balanced arming of the conflicting parties with the weapons of the Russian Federation can be a guarantee of stability in the region.

      This is sponsoring a war of extermination, while there is a weapon to fire, Assad was already told at the beginning of the conflict about border control, it wasn’t there now, the Kurds will also declare that they didn’t just fight and demand their own territory , statehood, Iran is also not averse to gaining a share of influence, after all, access to Mediterranean ports, at best, a kind of confederation will remain from Syria
  12. mamont5 27 September 2015 08: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "Russia has rights no less than the United States to strike at terrorists. And if the Americans do not agree with this, they will only have to admit that they are allies of the terrorists, which they really are."

    And THIS is a fact!
  13. lockout 27 September 2015 08: 50 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    So I do not understand why the Americans need a new BBV. And why Assad is bad for them is also not clear to me.
  14. Asadullah 27 September 2015 10: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why is she so late - this is an interesting question for a detailed consideration.


    Why? Or is the article not about that?

    Consequently, either the American bureaucratic system is frighteningly slow, or at the beginning of September something happened that the Americans could not have foreseen. If we proceed from the second option, then to understand what could happen - consider the current situation more.


    So what happened in early September? More details were brought to the attention of which American masters to unleash conflicts (interestingly, pyromaniac, is also considered a genius in the chemistry of combustion?) And the possible interests of some of the players in the Middle East theater. Not a word about hydrocarbons, and Europe, which is directly reflected in this war, was generally pushed into insignificant elements of the game .....

    And the beginning was so intriguing, and the content turned out to be so banal, incomplete and boring ....
  15. sabakina 27 September 2015 11: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Since mid-summer, the “Syrian transit” has increased, now the end of September, after 2 months the calendar winter will come, will not be as hot as in the summer ...
    R.S. Just my thoughts out loud ...
  16. rvsn90 27 September 2015 11: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Lockout
    So I do not understand why the Americans need a new BBV. And why Assad is bad for them is also not clear to me.


    I think there are a lot of reasons, from "misunderstanding" the policies of Russia to "banal" commercial interests, for example, the transportation of hydrocarbons through Syria to Europe, I want to crush our CH4 business, etc., etc.
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. afdjhbn67 27 September 2015 13: 37 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: huntsman650
      Fulfilled the plan, send everyone to, or you yourself will be sent to piz ....


      This is what you probably say on the trolls ’meeting ..
      What is your plan? what are they paying? wassat
  18. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 12: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The strategic interest of Russia and Israel coincides.

    FAQ, FAQ?

    Israel, as they say, is one of the founders of the Islamic State. They don’t even blather against him. Look, the Islamists have arranged for the shuher in Sinai against Egypt, turn around, behind Israel. No, to Egypt.
    About the USA. There they have a theory of war in the south, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria ...
    And suddenly Russia is on this path ... How are the USA going to get out? Here, flights in the sky of Bulgaria were banned, sanctions do not apply to us. I foresee the use of the Turkish resource against us.
  19. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 12: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Firstly, about Israel. This player will never enter into any coalitions (especially with Iran containing Lebanese Hezbollah), and will always rely only on himself.

    Exactly, only for yourself. But what about the lobby in the US and the EU? And for what reason did the USA want to buy Iran? They will try to do it, I think so.
  20. GEORGE 27 September 2015 12: 49 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Bone
    Russia has the right to bomb the positions of militants, if only because the legally elected government asks for it ...?! Well, as they say in spite of enemies to the joy of Mom !!!

    I’m very curious why n @ Indos think that it is possible to bomb Syria by the frogmen, but RUSSIA is not necessary ?? Along the way, they sniff the same coke ...
  21. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 12: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Edward Snowden is shocking again: the head of ISIS is actually an agent of Mossad. The purpose of World War III in Iraq? To squeeze out Russian influence, eliminate Assad and create “greater Israel”.
    http://protiproud.parlamentnilisty.cz/ru/politics/20.htm

    On the way to “Greater Israel”: ISIS ringleader is Mossad’s full-time agent Shimon Elliot
    http://communitarian.ru/novosti/politika/na_puti_k_velikomu_izrailyu_glavar_igil
    _yavlyaetsya_shtatnym_agentom_mossada_saymonom_eliotom_13012015 /
    1. ALEA IACTA EST 27 September 2015 13: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Good AAAH
      the head of ISIS is actually an agent of Mossad

      This is the true chapter of ISIS.
      1. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 13: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        This one sits firmly under the Zionists.
        If there are few articles, then there are statements by Orthodox elders that the West is ruled by Zionists.
        And then the Europeans would have themselves harakiri in the form of decomposition of the traditional family and the invasion of refugees arranged? Yeah, now.
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvAoV0uVZhc
      2. The comment was deleted.
  22. ochakow703 27 September 2015 12: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I just think that you need to decide on the goals. It is necessary to bomb the STAFF, and then all other pieces from the board will fall. I think the headquarters coordinates I know not only me.
    1. Cat man null 27 September 2015 13: 02 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: ochakow703
      It’s necessary to bomb the HQ ... I think HQ coordinates I know not only me

      You are not talking about the Pentagon, I hope? belay
    2. NordUral 27 September 2015 14: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      What for? It is necessary to repeat the experience of the destruction of the USSR.
  23. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 13: 06 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “OSNOE NEST”: TECHNOLOGY FOR CREATING A FALSE TERRORISM FLAG

    The essence of this strategy is to create a common impression that Israel is threatened by an enemy near its borders. At the same time, the former Prime Minister of Israel Moshe Charette in his personal diaries very clearly said that the Jewish political and military leadership never believed in any Arab threat to Israel, Ralph Schonman writes. "They sought to maneuver and force the Arab states to engage in military clashes, in relation to which the Zionist leadership was confident that it would win so that Israel could destabilize the Arab regimes and the planned occupation of additional territory."

    Implementation operation. According to the Gulf Daily News in Bahrain, Al-Baghdadi "had been training intensively at Mossad for a year, in addition to courses in theology and art of speech." In June, a Jordanian official confirmed to Aaron Klein from WorldNetDaily that ISIS members were trained in 2012 by American instructors at a secret base in the Jordanian city of Safavi. During the deployment operation, Al-Baghdadi was also placed in the Camp Bucca American Prison, near Um Qasr in Iraq. Former US Air Force security officer and commander of the Camp Bucca prisoner of war camp (2006-2007) James Skylar Gerrond confessed in October that the camp "was a" pressure cooker "of extremism." “Indirect evidence suggests that Al-Baghdadi’s consciousness may have been controlled when he was a US military prisoner in Iraq,” writes Dr. Kevin Barrett.

    The destruction of the Arab and Muslim states according to the "Inon plan" will be completed from within, using their internal religious and ethnic contradictions.

    Therefore, ISIS (fully controlled by Mossad, and under the leadership of Al-Baghdadi / Shimon Eliott) cleans the territory of Syria and Iraq from Arabs. If the plan succeeds, Israel will become fabulously rich, controlling oil and gas flows to Europe. Therefore, Israelis treat Islamist terrorists in their hospitals, transport them across the border between Israel and Syria, feed the terrorists, arm them, and crank up their oil deals through their Zionist banks.
  24. NordUral 27 September 2015 14: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everything is very competent. Already Afghanistan has proved this to us, the Union. Now - the development of the process and also successful - everyone has problems, but not the States. Which was required.
  25. KRIG55 27 September 2015 14: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    From personal: for 6 years he worked with l / s, there were all sorts of guys - Russian, non-Russian, lumps, outspoken stupid people. It happened, but there was one Kurd, small, puny - but a warrior inside. For two years, not a single remark, a fighter like hours. Therefore, if you can attract the Kurds to your side-attract-you will not regret it.
  26. Koronik 27 September 2015 15: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “But if the leading American diplomat, turning directly to Tehran, hoped to circumvent the Russian initiative in Syria, he was very late. Iran, supported by the ground, air and sea forces of two world powers, Russia and China, is already rapidly increasing its military presence in the war-affected country. "
    I think that in the near future we will be witnessing enormous geopolitical changes in the world.
  27. Aleksandr1959 27 September 2015 15: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Director of the Information and Press Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry Maria Zakharova criticized France in connection with the “Islamic State” airstrikes in Syria, which Paris called “self-defense”.
    “I would like to learn more about the concept of self-defense in the form of airstrikes against an attacking state without their consent, as well as its compliance with international law,” Zakharova writes on Facebook.


    She responded to a statement by French Prime Minister Manuel Waltz, who called the French Air Force air strikes on positions of the Islamic State terrorist group in Syria “necessary self-defense”.
    “What kind of venturers: a referendum in Crimea is an annexation, and airstrikes without the approval of the Security Council and the consent of the government are self-defense,” writes Zakharova

    http://vz.ru/news/2015/9/27/769063.html
  28. DobryAAH 27 September 2015 16: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The Russian military took command of the operation east of Aleppo
    http://free-news.su/politika/5320-russkie-voennye-vzyali-komandovanie

    Russian aircraft strike ISIS east of Aleppo - Arab media
    http://free-news.su/proisshestviya/5295-aviaudar-po-igil

    Russian marines attacked ISIS terrorist base
    http://free-news.su/proisshestviya/5304-morpehi-rossii-atakovali-igil
  29. Sibiria 27 September 2015 18: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    http://russian.rt.com/article/119296 полезно в Америку Президенту нашему ездить lol laughing
  30. Signaller 27 September 2015 18: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The article is certainly super, but where is China ?????? And he is already there. A Chinese aircraft carrier has already entered Tauras. Planes on the way. 1000 Marines of China will also appear. China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, maybe Egypt will catch up. . It will not be weak. Turkey, too, I think will come. So the US will have to swallow dust. This week will show Hu from Hu.
    1. pioner77 27 September 2015 18: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      a week will not show but half a year yes
  31. pioner77 27 September 2015 18: 58 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    I was having dinner with a girl, and she served in Tsahal. so she said that Israel is doomed for several more years and that’s all. dinner was in the year so 2009 means all the same there were forces there who want to save Israel
  32. iouris 28 September 2015 11: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The campaign is already beginning under the slogan: "How can ISIS help?".
    I think that the "limited contingent", first of all, did not allow Turkey to run into Syria. It may well be that there is no ISIS, but there is a desire to seize oil and transport routes by the hands of Turkey, which at the same time hopes to solve the "Kurdish problem" and, as a maximum, include Syria in Turkey.
  33. mitrich 28 September 2015 17: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: marlin1203
    Israel will choke. Arabs are still warriors laughing


    Duc, God-chosen ones will be worshiped and they will play in the coffin. Double good!
  34. Buffalo 29 September 2015 21: 28 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    In the port of Tartus, the Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning docked.
    http://agitpro.su/v-portu-tartus-prishvartovalsya-kitajskij-avianosec-lyaonin/