The United States prepared for retaliatory action in the event that the Russian Federation withdraws from the INF Treaty

Spokesman for the US Under Secretary of State Rose Goethemuller, Alexander Bell, said that the United States and the allied countries were prepared to respond if Russia withdraws from the Medium and Shorter Missile Treaty (INF).

“While the United States wants to avoid returning to the past, the United States and its allies will act in such a way as to prevent Russia's military advantage if the violations (RSDM) continue,” the spokesman told Sputnik RIA "News".

Earlier, the head of the Federation Council’s Defense and Security Committee, Viktor Ozerov, said that by deploying new nuclear weapons on its territory, Germany could push Russia to withdraw from the INF. This statement was made after a message appeared on the German television channel ZDF, citing documents from the US budget department, about the start of preparations for the deployment of new American B61-12 nuclear bombs in the territory aviation Bundeswehr Büchel base in the German federal state of Rhineland-Palatinate.

The German Defense Ministry refused to comment on these reports, and a Pentagon spokesman told Sputnik in an interview that the United States did not believe that they were involved in the violation of any nuclear agreements. arms.

Recently, from the Russian Federation and the United States are increasingly heard allegations of the development of weapons falling under the INF Treaty, which was signed by the United States and the USSR in 1987 year. Russia and the United States began to consult on this issue 11 September in Moscow. According to their results, the Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation stated that there was no satisfactory data from the Washington side on the questions raised.

Comments

[Alekseev-Orsk]

Pentagon spokesman in an interview with Sputnik noted that the United States does not believe that they are involved in the violation of any nuclear weapons treaties.


Oh you can’t believe Amers ... There is no faith to them !!!

[jjj]

In fact, both Americans and we are looking for a reason to painlessly withdraw from these treaties. The redivision of the world requires free hands. And, I believe, we have something to please the world with.

[Rus2012]

Quote: jjj

In fact, both Americans and we are looking for a reason to painlessly withdraw from these treaties.

... in fact, 3,14and the day is "breaking fences". We have to answer. That's not even the point ...
The answer to the western rabble in the form of input to the DB on its territory (and coastal waters) sea-based KR of the type "Caliber" (1,2-2 thousand km) and "Iskander", even "Rubezh RS-26" is a weak move. For it affects only the "weak-willed and not sovereign" Geyrop, and the main foreign "inspirer" remains unassigned ...
Therefore, there must be an adequate and symmetrical move - made and close to the "zaluzhy" PRTB (for schoolchildren - Field Repair and Technical Brigades 12GUMO). There are options - Venezuela, Nicaragua ... and Cuba. Naturally with carriers ... Like the Su-34. Moreover, the devices may well be controlled by the pilots of the armies of these countries. And the PRTB is at hand, under the protection of the RF Armed Forces. In some versions, there may well be "Iskander", for the time being in "normal gear". Well, the base for the submarine with the "Caliber" ...
This will be an adequate and symmetrical move. Not so tender and expensive ...

[skeket]

Quote: Rus2012

The answer to the western rabble in the form of input to the DB on its territory (and coastal waters) of the sea-based KR of the type "Caliber" (1,2-2 thousand km) and "Iskander", even the "Rubezh RS-26" is a weak move

Quote: Rus2012

There are options - Venezuela, Nicaragua ... and Cuba. Naturally with carriers ... Like the Su-34. Moreover, the devices may well be controlled by the pilots of the armies of these countries. And the PRTB is at hand, under the protection of the RF Armed Forces. In some versions, there may well be "Iskander", for the time being in "normal gear". Well, the base for the submarine with the "Caliber" ...

Sea and air-based missiles do not fall under the INF, so the Gauges are quite relevant, but the Iskander with special warheads, it’s just the same that can be brought under the agreement if their range is more than 500 km, which the Americans indicate.

[Rus2012]

Quote: skeket

if their range is more than 500 km, which the Americans indicate

... for information - "Iskander-E" has a range of 280 km. Based in Cuba (up to the US coastline = 226 km), to cover up to 60 km of the densely populated coast.
Iskander-E is an export version that can be LEGALLY delivered to Cuba.
A Russian PRTB with a nuclear warhead for the Iskander RK can be based nearby. With the onset of OP-VP - YABCH are transferred to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Cuba! Also, nuclear warheads can be transferred from the PRTB to cruise missiles with a range of up to 280 km of the standard equipment of the Su-30, Su-24, Su-34 of the Cuban Air Force.
Similarly, there are 3,14 endos in Europe (passing nuclear bombs to Germany, Belgium, Turkey). What are you talking about!
What inna questions ?!

[Uncle]

Quote: Rus2012

Iskander-E is an export version that can LEGALLY be delivered to Cuba.

Would Cuba want to deploy our missiles?

[aleks700]

Similarly, there are 3,14 endos in Europe (passing nuclear bombs to Germany, Belgium, Turkey). What are you talking about!

Nuance. Germany, Turkey, Belgium are not afraid of sanctions. But Cuba still does not want them.

[skeket]

Quote: Rus2012

Iskander-E is an export version that can LEGALLY be delivered to Cuba.

Quote: Rus2012

Similarly, there are 3,14 endos in Europe (passing nuclear bombs to Germany, Belgium, Turkey). What are you talking about!
What inna questions ?!

The questions are that the penids today re-established diplomatic relations with Cuba and lifted the sanctions, tomorrow they will fill up with Snickers and legs, and the day after tomorrow the Cubans will yell that the Americans are their brothers forever ... What doesn’t it remind of?

[leo3972]

We must again put medium- and short-range missiles in Cuba, and let the Americans bang their teeth in fear

[marlin1203]

Exactly! "To hell with the captain! I want to sleep in his cabin! .."

[Vladimir 23rus]

The fact of the matter is that for us it does not work painlessly. The bright-striped ones lead to the fact that Russia violates and that means we will not comply. The problem is that they have almost half of the infrastructure ready (the so-called missile defense), and we have not yet begun to prepare (or maybe we don’t know what )

[siberalt]

What military advantage is there? Budgets are simply not comparable. They are twisting Russia’s arms and grandmothers into armaments are being kicked out of their government.

[Voha_krim]

Quote: Alekseev-Orsk

Pentagon spokesman in an interview with Sputnik noted that the United States does not believe that they are involved in the violation of any nuclear weapons treaties.


Oh you can’t believe Amers ... There is no faith to them !!!

Let, for starters, be restored in the ABM agreement!

[ZU-23]

Well, they will answer, we will answer, we are not used to it. In general, the Americans are specifically dropping nuclear bombs into Germany, so that on this basis we would put Germany in sight, from here the German people will start to wind up against Russia. If anyone remembers, Stratfor said that for the complete encirclement of Russia, it remains to completely pull Germany to its side.

[Altona]

Quote: ZU-23

Well, they will answer, we will answer, we are not used to it. In general, the Americans are specifically dropping nuclear bombs into Germany, so that on this basis we would put Germany in sight, from here the German people will start to wind up against Russia. If anyone remembers, Stratfor said that for the complete encirclement of Russia, it remains to completely pull Germany to its side.

---------------------
China probably will not stand aside, it’s also no player now ... If the two nuclear powers stand ready to sweep away everything that moves from the planet, what kind of Silk Roads are there?

[inkass_98]

Quote: Alekseev-Orsk

There is no faith to them !!!

Yeah, and the editors have faith? Why is there a photo of Chinese technology in the article if it is a US-Russian treaty?

[Black Colonel]

So I was also surprised by the technology of the Middle Kingdom.

[Vend]

The United States prepared for retaliatory action in the event that the Russian Federation withdraws from the INF Treaty

I am sure that they have prepared. Already rehearsed speech that the US is unhappy with Russia's withdrawal from the treaty.

[ASG7]

Yeah, Psaki is ready to go to work, tremble Russia.

[hydrox]

But Russia does not withdraw from this Treaty :: it DECIDED that the Iskanders are in the legal space of this Treaty and therefore the States can only powerlessly observe an increase in the number of regiments armed with them ...
Oh, sorry for the "Oka" destroyed by the traitors to Russia ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: hydrox

Oh, sorry for the "Oka" destroyed by the traitors to Russia ...

And what prevents in the foreseeable future, when withdrawing from this agreement, to restore the production of OKI (with new electronics and an engine)? There is such a suspicion that long before today's fuss on these agreements, our analysts calculated this situation, and would not be surprised if of that moment in some design bureau they are not building, something like an OKI is only a back door, more powerful and more cunning.

[plow]

Iskander M is the evolutionary development of the Oka with new electronics and a motor. It would be as soon as possible to restore BZHRK with "yars" or "abroad" Yes, several 200 megatons of thermonuclear poisons under the mainland of America to wash away this muck.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Arandir

Iskander M is this, the evolutionary development of the Oka with new electronics and an engine.

Yes, that’s true. But I’m talking about a new medium-range missile system, which will be better than Iskander and Oka, but who took all the best from them.

[Penetrator]

Judging by the photo to the article, the US’s response to the Russian Federation consists in the use of Chinese Hongqi-12 air defense systems

[hydrox]

Indeed, a photograph of Iskander alone is enough for these strategists to run to change diapers!

[vorobey]

Quote: Penetrator

use of Chinese fuel dispensers

apparently yes ...

but the experts clarify ... why on the cabs four eye bolts ... I already broke my head ... is it really for quick access to the engine?

[Penetrator]

Quote: vorobey

why on the cabs four eye bolts ... I already broke my head ... really for quick access to the engine?

For quick change of calculation. Together with the cabin

[Abbra]

These are not eye bolts. These are the Tundzyu-129K miniature quasi-quantum field locators.

[Oberon 1]

I also noticed that the cars with Chinese rackets

[Name]

Here are the children of ungulates, and ..., they can build up, but Russia should be in the specified "stall". GMO radishes. Well, okay:

[theadenter]

They provoke themselves, and then they grumble themselves that we are supposedly inadequately reacting.

No need to withdraw from the INF Treaty. But it is necessary to provide for new missiles the possibility of such an application after a minimal modernization, in case the agreement does fly into the ballot box.

[vovanpain]

The actions of minke whales resemble the immortal. Not my fault, he himself came.

[Oman 47]

Under the rule of Sarai Smoked with the Americans about disarmament talk - stupid.
A dialogue with the West is possible only with a weighty DUBINA in hand.
Glory to Gd, the Kremlin clearly understands this.
It was with the selling stsuke Gorbat (burn it in hell!) It was possible to cut the "Pioneers".

[kamski]

the flight time of cruise and ballistic missiles to Moscow from the territory of Ukraine, and there is no doubt that these systems will be there for only a few minutes. Therefore, it does not matter what the United States will do next, the main thing is that our "STRATEGIC PARTNERS" were confident that there was more than a sufficient number of short- and medium-range missiles from Russia. Even taking into account the fact that the missile defense unit will be shot down, our "STRATEGIC PARTNERS" must be sure that their existence will cease.

[rotmistr60]

The United States does not believe that it is involved in the violation of any nuclear weapons treaties.

Usa listen and ears fade. They are always so white and fluffy against the background of Russia.

[narval20]

Again threats ...
Again, mutual buildup of weapons of all kinds ...
WE LIVE WHERE ANYTHING WILL BE QUIET !?

[tiras85]

Stop the provocation! Depart from the border with the Russian Federation. Play up! It will be necessary, we will leave the Agreement, without fail!

[Russia]

The dog barks, and the Iskander is standing, the Bulava is at the ready, the poplars are planted ...

[sergej30003]

The United States is doing everything so that nothing is left of its vassals, hoping to sit out overseas, in the event of a nuclear war, on the European continent

[remy]

It is necessary to clearly draw a line.
Germany is not a nuclear country!
Any attempt to deploy nuclear / thermonuclear weapons on its territory will be thwarted!
By delivering a preventive nuclear strike!
Europeans must understand this very clearly!
without any jokes!

[Vladimir Pozlnyakov]

The trouble is in the "Golden Billion" doctrine and the desire to seize Siberia, the only place where (?) Life will be saved in the event of a nuclear war or the explosion of the Yoluston volcano!

[kartalovkolya]

But the GMO officers promised to take all their nuclear weapons overseas, but in fact announced the deployment of new "smart nuclear bombs" in Germany, which actually blur the line between the INF and Strategic nuclear missiles. But if these "political swindlers" start bypassing everything agreements, to play its dastardly game, why should Russia adhere to this enslaving treaty? After all, the "mattress makers", regardless of anyone or anything, just got out of the ABM Treaty, and what are we "redheads"? No guys, I still believe that the GDP is closely monitoring all this and an "adequate" answer is most likely already ready (as in the case of the US withdrawal from the ABM Treaty)! And to make our serious intentions more convincing, simply take and place a little Iskander near the minke whales, well, at least in Cuba or Nicaragua (they are needed there to protect a new canal that will be built to replace the Panama canal)! and our “rainbow” ones will be completely “not partners” at all! As for Europe, it has long been "thrown at stake" by players from Washington and its fate is predetermined and deplorable if their rulers do not change their minds in time!

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

The United States prepared for retaliatory action in the event that the Russian Federation withdraws from the INF Treaty

and someone will explain what the Chinese military equipment is here (pictured) ?!

[bsk_mna54]

is nya going to go back in time ??? Yes, they are already there. And how many times have they been in the past: waging wars around the world, missile defense, the creation of barbarian organizations that feed on human blood and other barbarism. And you say that they can return to the past !! ??

[Old26]

Quote: inkass_98

Yeah, and the editors have faith? Why is there a photo of Chinese technology in the article if it is a US-Russian treaty?

Moreover, a photograph of the Chinese anti-aircraft complex HQ-12 is placed

Quote: NEXUS

And what prevents in the foreseeable future, upon withdrawing from this agreement, to restore the production of OKI

And what for when there is "Iskander"?

Quote: Arandir

Yes, several thermonuclear weapons of 200 megatons under the mainland of America, so that this muck is washed away.

Forget it. If 50 megatons weighed under 30 tons, how much will 200 megatons weigh. In addition, this is the biggest stupidity to use them for mining. Regular maintenance how will you conduct ???

Quote: kamski

the main thing is that our "STRATEGIC PARTNERS" were confident that more than a sufficient number of short and medium-range missiles were flying from Russia.

But this is problematic and even very. Russia is not the USSR and is not capable of producing in the same quantity as the Union

[Old26]

Quote: tyras85

It will be necessary, we will leave the Agreement, without fail!

And we will be at the same time the very last fools ...

[made13]

In fact, this statement suggests that the United States withdrew from the treaty unilaterally. If they ALREADY have something to answer, then most likely they never followed it.

[Old26]

Quote: remy

It is necessary to clearly draw a line. Germany is not a nuclear country! Any attempt to deploy nuclear / thermonuclear weapons on its territory will be thwarted by a preventive nuclear strike! Europeans must understand this very clearly! Without any jokes!

The thing is that it turns out the use of double standards. While the GDR, Poland, Czechoslovakia were in the Warsaw Pact, our tactical nuclear weapons were concentrated in their territories, we trained the pilots and rocket launchers of these countries to use these weapons, in which case to transfer nuclear weapons to the national air forces and missile units. And that was considered normal. Training was not considered a violation of the agreement on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Yes, these countries were then under the scrutiny of NATO intelligence, and such goals should have been hit in the first place.

And we did not take a steam bath that Poland, Czechoslovakia and the German Democratic Republic are not nuclear countries. It was necessary - they kept their nuclear weapons there, without violating the nuclear-free status of these states (they did not have these weapons in service) This was quite normal.

Now we are raising a wild squeal on this subject and accusing the Americans of violating all conceivable and inconceivable treaties.

Yes, the Americans are going to add about 20 bombs to the arsenal in Germany. True, I wonder how they plan to do this in the 3rd quarter of 2015, when the funds for testing this version of the bomb - B-61 mod. 12 allocated until fiscal year 2018 inclusive.

This will not change the balance in Europe. In the amount that is - 50-110 at the airbase Lakenhin 20 at the airbase Klein-Bruegl, 20 at the airbase Folkel, 20 on a / b Buchel, 50 on Aviano и 40 on Gedi Torre, 50-90 on a / b in Ingerlike add more 20 to Buchel.
Each nuclear carrier carrier aircraft takes 1-2 bombs, usually 2. That is, the BC will be added to another 10 aircraft ...

Quote: Helgi4

Itself violates everything .... ... It surrounded Russia with military bases, conducts its military exercises in the Baltic states, right on the border with Russia ... With a state like America, you must terminate ALL AGREEMENTs!

I must say that None AGREEMENT The United States did not violate strategic arms, as if we did not want to assume that they did not comply with the treaties. Military exercises - and where to conduct, especially with the Baltic countries or Poland? In Africa?.
If our ZVO conducts its exercises, does it conduct them in the east of the country, away from NATO countries? No, close, just like them. This is one of the ways of psychological pressure, old as the world, and we all resent that it never happened ...

[Papakiko]

Quote: Old26

The thing is that it turns out the use of double standards.

Have you drank coffee instead of coffee in the morning?
The Warsaw Treaty Organization (ATS) was created on May 14, 1955 in response to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO of April 4, 1949.
On February 25, 1991, the ATS member states abolished its military structures, and on July 1, 1991 in Prague signed the Protocol on the complete termination of the Treaty.
In which former member of the Department of Internal Affairs Russia places and maintains bases with "vigorous weapons", and just general garrisons ?!
Where are the double standards ?!

Quote: Old26

I must say that no US strategic arms treaty has been violated

Well, you can clearly see everything from your "mole hut".
And NATO stands still and Russia drags its infrastructure to the borders of NATO members, YES!?

Quote: Old26

our tactical nuclear weapons were concentrated in their territories, we trained the pilots and rocket launchers of these countries to use these weapons, in which case to transfer nuclear weapons to the national air forces and missile units.

Yes, you not only drink strange, but still not understandable breathe.
After the "Prague Spring", with great care, new samples were supplied to the participants of the Department of Internal Affairs. In the case of "kipisha", the USSR would have enough WGV to resolve issues in the European theater of operations. For everything else, there were divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces on the territory of the USSR.

Quote: Old26

Yes, the Americans are going to add about 20 bombs to the arsenal in Germany. True, I wonder how they plan to do this in the 3rd quarter of 2015, when the funds for testing this version of the bomb - B-61 mod.12 were allocated until fiscal year 2018 inclusive.

Yes, it’s interesting to them how they can place 20 charges, but they didn’t agree on the budget with you in the parliament either.
The Pentagon’s budget will be spent on any expenses and they won’t agree on anything with you, let alone interest or intrigue YOU.

[Rus2012]

Dear colleague, you write blandly about Poland, Czechoslovakia and the German Democratic Republic from the time of the ...
But where are they ?!
Politics presupposes symmetry and parity, so we have the right to demand "the removal of 3,14ND TNW from Europe," we have withdrawn ours. They refuse, we have the right to act symmetrically! Those. similarly, to introduce forward basing tactical nuclear weapons near potential theaters of war, which we ourselves have the right to determine!

[Rus2012]

3,14ndostan and their sluts minus trying to deprive us of sovereign right ?! Grind caries, your time is up!

[roi2009]

Yes, they’ve been ready for twenty years, the current enemy is different now. Thinking, tough.

[roskot]

that the United States does not believe that it is involved in the violation of any nuclear weapons treaties.

No, it's not us. Russia is breaking.

[Radogos]

piiiiindosy .yuyu

[Old26]

Quote: remy

It is necessary to clearly draw a line.
Germany is not a nuclear country!
Any attempt to deploy nuclear / thermonuclear weapons on its territory will be thwarted!
By delivering a preventive nuclear strike!
Europeans must understand this very clearly!
without any jokes!

Germany is not a nuclear country. And it never was, despite the fact that YABZ and the USA and the USSR were on its territory. But what about the same Belarus? Some comrades are proposing to supply not only Ikanderas with YaBG, but also Yarsy there. How will the other side view such deployment of nuclear missiles in a non-nuclear country? Doesn't he think that this, too, must be stopped without fail?

Quote: Papakiko

Have you drank coffee instead of coffee in the morning?

Exclusively coffee. In the morning nothing more And why write about when the Warsaw Pact was created and dissolved? Do you think I don’t know this?

Quote: Papakiko

In which former member of the Department of Internal Affairs Russia places and maintains bases with "vigorous weapons", and just general garrisons ?! Where are the double standards ?!

Do you understand Russian well? Or read only upstairs? What does the phrase mean?

While the GDR, Poland, Czechoslovakia were in the Warsaw Pact

understand well? Especially the word UNTIL? What is difficult to understand that we are talking about the past tense? About the time when these countries were part ORGANIZATIONS OF THE WARSAW CONTRACT?

And you immediately, seeing the phrase double standards (how could it be otherwise, because only Americans use them, we no-no) write an angry rebuke? Not worth it ...

Where do I see double standards? In the statements of our "talking heads". I will repeat if you have not yet understood about double standards and what they were

1. We trained our allies in the use of nuclear weapons. To the day "H", if you need to pass it to them.
2. The Soviet armed forces stored tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of the Warsaw Pact countries. Moreover, part of this weapon was intended to be transferred to our allies.

What are double standards? In the fact that in one case, training is not recognized as a violation of the treaty banning nuclear weapons (when it came to us), in the other it is considered a violation. Moreover, an example of a violation of Articles 1 and 2 of the treaty is cited. True, for some reason, they try not to cite the text of the article, so that the people “shaw”. Well, propaganda is a great thing.

Also, the current deployment is said to be something illegal (as well as the placement throughout the entire time they have been there) - you understand that we are talking about American nuclear weapons, in another case - as a completely legitimate action aimed at “strengthening peace in to the whole world ”- this is when it came to us.
Is this not an example of double standards?

[Old26]

Quote: Papakiko

Well, you can clearly see everything from your "molehill" dugout. And NATO is standing still, while Russia is dragging its infrastructure to the borders of NATO members, YES !?

Read the top again? Repeat. I said that NO TREATY ON STRATEGIC WEAPONS Americans DO NOT VIOLATE.
However, no. It is imperative to remember the expansion of NATO. And you can find out WHAT AGREEMENT at the same time violated the Americans and NATO? Do not remember? Or was it PROMISE ONLY one politician to another that NATO will not expand east. After a couple of years, this politician leaves big politics and that’s all.
It’s like with loans. If you took in a bank, then sign a lot of documents that determine what you should do and what it will be. And if you borrowed from a friend and didn’t repay it in time, then alas, he can hope for your honest word and decency that you will return at the agreed time ...

Quote: Papakiko

Yes, you are not only drinking strange, but still breathing incomprehensible. After the "Prague Spring", with great care, new samples were supplied to the participants of the Department of Internal Affairs. In the case of "kipisha", the USSR would have enough WGV to resolve issues in the European theater of operations. For everything else, there were divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces on the territory of the USSR.

Well, of course, when there are no arguments, you just have to write that. What do I drink? I prefer cognac (Dagestan or Praskoveisky), or good vodka, for example, the North Ossetian Golden Veles (in extreme cases, Praskoveysky MOONSHINE. And the soul is clean enough air. The builder of my fortress city at one time foresaw and chose a place where most of the time the wind. Therefore, the air here is clean, and the city is green.
As for the essence of the question, it would still be worthwhile to be a little in the subject, since write. And then write that "with great care" were delivered new samples. But in reality, both "Tochka", new at that time, and "Oka" were supplied to almost all the countries of the Internal Affairs Directorate, both to Czechoslovakia and the GDR ... And all nuclear weapons storage facilities (and there were 30 of them) were eliminated in 1990-1991 years, and not after the "Prague Spring". There were, and if necessary, ammunition from them would be transferred to the national armies

[Old26]

Quote: Papakiko

Yes, it’s interesting to them how they can place 20 charges, but they didn’t agree on the budget with you in the parliament either.

So has this statement been disavowed? Will no longer be posted in the 3rd quarter of 2015 ... Have you heard? And the network already has materials about this. And it’s worth reading not only Wikipedia, but also looking at some materials from Americans. And there they have funding both by years and by subsection ...

Quote: Rus2012

Dear colleague, you write blandly about Poland, Czechoslovakia and the German Democratic Republic from the time of the ...
But where are they ?!
Politics presupposes symmetry and parity, so we have the right to demand "the removal of 3,14ND TNW from Europe," we have withdrawn ours. They refuse, we have the right to act symmetrically! Those. similarly, to introduce forward basing tactical nuclear weapons near potential theaters of war, which we ourselves have the right to determine!

Not at all. If everything were that simple ... But unfortunately symmetry is not assumed. Only if it is prescribed in the contracts. And so ... The only "industry" - where it works - is diplomacy. Only there, the expulsion of a certain number of diplomats from the country leads to the expulsion of the same number from the country whose deported. And in other cases, alas, no ...
Yes, we have the right to take symmetrical measures.

[Vadim237]

And we will also have an answer to the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty - the creation of heavy-duty electronic warfare systems that will launch all missiles in Europe at launch sites, along with all electronics and military equipment, including civilian ones.

[Rus2012]

Quote: Vadim237

And we will have an answer too

... there is a much more compelling answer - ultra-deep-sea underwater robots with a nuclear powered control system and nuclear land mines of 10 megatons or more, which will "roam" in the coastal zone of the "pool"!

For example, how this "nuclear double-barreled" Khrushchev in an unmanned version

[Old26]

Quote: Vadim237

And we will also have an answer to the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty - the creation of heavy-duty electronic warfare systems that will launch all missiles in Europe at launch sites, along with all electronics and military equipment, including civilian ones.

Do you seriously believe that we will create electronic warfare systems with a range of 2000-3000 km? Of tremendous power and at the same time everything will be drowned out for them, and we will have everything curly ???