Tests: The Tor system in the movement hit an air target

35
The Almaz-Antey Concern conducted test fires from the 9A331MW combat vehicle from the Tor-M2U short-range air defense system in motion, it reports TASS message of the press service of the enterprise.



“The tests carried out confirmed the possibility of firing the complex in motion. This gives an important tactical advantage, which allows accompanying military columns of the Thor air defense system in movement to repel enemy air raids. So far, the shelling of targets was carried out only from a short stop ",
cites the press service of the words of General Designer Pavel Sozinov.

It is reported that "the tests were held at the Kapustin Yar test site in the Astrakhan region." Moving at a speed of more than 25 km / h on an unequipped road, the air defense system took on auto tracking and hit the simulator of the Saman air target, which was located at a distance of more than 8 km.

"As part of the test when the combat vehicle moves along the highway, the possibility of detecting and taking a target for auto tracking in motion, quality and accuracy of tracking of targets in motion, the impactless release of a rocket from a container, and a number of other parameters are also verified and confirmed"- said the general director of the company Yan Novikov.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    22 September 2015 17: 50
    But this is cool. Thor previously could not do such things, which is why, to protect the columns on the march, he had to duplicate the air defense system with other machines (for example, "armor")
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +14
      22 September 2015 17: 58
      Thanks to the defense industry! "I sleep" much quieter than at the beginning of the XNUMXs!
      (when several years were left before the DISAPPEARANCE.)
      1. +11
        22 September 2015 18: 02
        Quote: dr.Bo
        "I sleep" much calmer than at the beginning of the XNUMXs!

        In the late 90s, the campaign did not sleep at all? wink
        1. +1
          22 September 2015 18: 09
          I’m singing for the night, so I see the OBXSS all night
          -Don't you sleep ... laughing
          1. +2
            23 September 2015 00: 09
            Is there really so much stuck that still OBHSS dream?
    3. +3
      22 September 2015 21: 34
      Quote: Darkmor
      other machines (for example, "shell")

      The shell is generally not for "shooting on the move"

      universal anti-aircraft missile and artillery system, designed to cover at close range strategic important military and industrial facilities.
      "Program for the development of a unified system of anti-aircraft missile weapons (weapons)" within the framework of the ROC "ZPRK", "Pantsir-S1", "Pantsir-SM", "Redut" and "Gladiator".

      and the fact that on the chassis 8x8 "Ural-5323.4" or "Kamaz" is the wish of the UAE

      The purpose of using a car chassis is the cost of the complex, which should cover the rear facilities, rather than troops in battle formations.






      no where you will not see "in motion"

      in the "Assessment of the characteristics of the Pantsir-S1 air defense missile system" at one of the open scientific and technical conferences of the Ministry of Defense of Russia and the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences. The authors of the report are V.V.Belotserkovsky, Candidate of Military Sciences, Associate Professor (Air Defense Forces) and I. A. Razin (VA VPVO VS), also no "gu-gu"

      Although the developer declared "opportunity shooting in motion and from short stops ";
  2. +4
    22 September 2015 17: 50
    somewhere in the Kaliningrad region, exercises would be conducted so that the NATO and the Estonians would not be bored to drag the Air Force
    1. +2
      22 September 2015 18: 24
      Yes, the A-10s just appeared there. An interesting target for training. (Hit the A-10 descent) smile
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. gjv
        +1
        22 September 2015 19: 48
        Quote: TOR2
        hit immediately A-10

        SAM took on auto tracking and hit a simulator of the air target "Saman",

        The A-10 in cruising mode is somewhat slower than the Samana. How will this affect the likelihood of defeat (in + or in -)?
        1. +1
          22 September 2015 21: 14
          "Saman" flew high, this one will try to cuddle to the ground.
          1. 0
            22 September 2015 22: 48
            I think it will reach the bottom. The main goal is to "capture".
  3. dsi
    0
    22 September 2015 17: 51
    General Designer Pavel Sozinov.

    Prepare your jacket for the order! For "Russian weapons" are you!
  4. 0
    22 September 2015 17: 51
    Very significant! Well done! Thanks to the engineers and specialists!
  5. +4
    22 September 2015 17: 52
    The news reminded a joke about a peaceful Soviet tractor
    1. +3
      22 September 2015 17: 55
      Quote: Tusv
      The news reminded a joke about a peaceful Soviet tractor

      The main thing is that reality does not follow the spirit of that anecdote ... and it would not be necessary to produce "seeders and winnowing machines" on the fields of border farms
      1. 0
        22 September 2015 18: 03
        The main thing is that TOR is a very successful device with anti-stop coating
    2. -4
      22 September 2015 18: 03
      Well, here the heading is more anecdotal, because it is absolutely clear from the heading that there was an air target in motion, so I went to ask how long since the defeat of a moving air object was an achievement, well, at least the article clearly says.
      1. 0
        22 September 2015 20: 40
        Quote: TheMi30
        Well, here the heading is more anecdotal, because it is absolutely clear from the heading that there was an air target in motion, so I went to ask how long since the defeat of a moving air object was an achievement, well, at least the article clearly says.

        It is just that it is customary to define one of the latest technical trends in mobile air defense systems at the present time.
      2. +2
        22 September 2015 22: 49
        Quote: TheMi30
        Well, here the heading is more anecdotal, because it is absolutely clear from the heading that there was an air target in motion, so I went to ask how long since the defeat of a moving air object was an achievement, well, at least the article clearly says.
        - You obviously have problems with the Russian language! Nothing happens! laughing
        1. 0
          29 October 2015 10: 47
          I have no problems, the title has been fixed.
        2. The comment was deleted.
  6. -2
    22 September 2015 17: 57
    A good complex, even at a speed of 40-60 km / h, the class would have "worked" in general.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      22 September 2015 18: 04
      The rocket takes off upwards, it still will not give additional speed. Why drive 60 km / h across the field. This is not a Christmas tree in Robin.
      1. +1
        22 September 2015 18: 21
        Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin
        The rocket takes off upwards, it still will not give additional speed. Why drive 60 km / h across the field. This is not a Christmas tree in Robin.

        During the march. Maybe instead of a gusli wheel.
    3. 0
      23 September 2015 22: 15
      Quote: marshes
      Nice complex, still at a speed of 40-60 km / h

      belay
      .
      And make the radar of the complex work according to the "method of 3 points" at 40-60 km / h?
      Or how ?
      by eye "anticipatory"
      And the battle crew will not clap their teeth at 40-60km / h? (Tea is not MKAD)
  7. 0
    22 September 2015 18: 01
    Well done designers, proud of them
  8. +13
    22 September 2015 18: 12
    And we made the very first "products" for "Thor" (9m 330), which I am proud of!
    1. +2
      22 September 2015 21: 21
      Quote: Vyatich
      And we made the very first "products" for "Thor" (9m 330), which I am proud of!


      My respect and bow to you for that. I hope you will not remain without work (in 3 shifts, not for free, of course).
    2. 0
      23 September 2015 00: 24
      Quote: Vyatich
      And we made the very first "products" for "Thor" (9m 330)

      I have long wanted to ask:

      Here is the bar (circled in red) what is it?
      ===============
      Why did they remove (in the photo) the jumper and spring m-lock of the rudders?
      not supposed to be.
  9. +1
    22 September 2015 18: 38
    Yes! While - in motion for eight kilometers. Wait, soon they will teach you how to shoot down in a jump, with a fly swatter, and then a scribe will come to everyone who "buzzes" in the wrong place ... lol
  10. 0
    22 September 2015 18: 56
    Hmm, for some reason I always thought that for launching a rocket with a vertical launch, the car is either violet in motion or stands still.
    In my Shilka, it was constructively laid down to fire cannons at aviation, somewhere at 5-10 km / h, the super duper "Pantsyr" is no longer able to do this.
    1. 0
      22 September 2015 20: 57
      You do not take into account the buildup of the container in motion. The shell from the barrel is not going anywhere, but if the rocket hooks the walls when exiting .... negative
      1. +1
        22 September 2015 23: 01
        Quote: Fafnir
        but if the rocket hooks the walls at the exit.

        "Poor fellows" missiles, and anti-ship missiles and the Kyrgyz Republic sea ​​based ...
        They "hook" on the walls of the TPK or the launch cup and do not suspect. DURING ROLLING (limits 6-7 points). They make launches and produce.



        There you can’t bring a spoon to your mouth
        1. 0
          23 September 2015 13: 52
          What does it have to do with sea-based? In the sea, a large amplitude of "vibration" at a low frequency and the rocket has time to leave the TPK, and on land, on the contrary, the amplitude is much less and the frequency is higher and, naturally, special measures had to be taken for the unhindered exit of the rocket. Plus, as you indicated below, the problems with the "radar jumping through potholes" wink .
          1. 0
            23 September 2015 17: 36
            Quote: Fafnir
            What does the sea based?

            and there (on land) and there (at sea) PU "shakes".
            Quote: Fafnir
            At sea, a large amplitude of "vibration" at a low frequency and the rocket has time to leave the TPK

            1. Well, well, well. and the numbers are "in amplitude" and "frequency"? Pallograph data?
            during the interaction of the wave and the ship there is a resonance zone, there is a swell, the roll can roll to such values ​​that the vehicle with its 10-15% does not dream

            2. PU on the chassis of the vehicle still have such lotions as shock absorbers, and it does not move like a tank through swamps

            3. Large amplitude, large lateral accelerations in the TPK or on the PU

            Quote: Fafnir
            and naturally, special measures had to be taken for the unhindered exit of the rocket.


            they are already accepted.
            guides (or steam cocoon), ejection device, discharged shoes, etc.
            In general, the rocket will never catch on the walls if the launcher does not move as it should not (like bugs).
            Yes, and do not shoot on the go. fairy tales are

            Quote: Fafnir
            with "radar galloping through potholes"

            This is a slightly different issue with guidance methods.
    2. +1
      22 September 2015 23: 17
      Quote: Captain Nemo
      that to launch a rocket with a vertical launch, the car is violet in motion or it stands still.

      and with an inclined start, the same is not very red.
      SAM "Volna" on the TFR project 01090

      SAM M-11 "Storm"

      well and so on.
      Do you think the ship anchors during launch?
      And the interception of the CC is carried out in absolute calm?

      Start is possible ... but the defeat of the target .. mmm. Especially by the method of aiming at three points (Pantsir). And by the method of "half-straightening" the current angles of sight of the missile and the target (azimuth and elevation) ... from the radar "jumping" over potholes?
      Better with a short stop(where to chase that?)
  11. +2
    22 September 2015 23: 49
    Quote: Polite Moose
    Quote: Vyatich
    And we made the very first "products" for "Thor" (9m 330), which I am proud of!


    My respect and bow to you for that. I hope you will not remain without work (in 3 shifts, not for free, of course).

    Thank you! True, quite a while ago (1986-1989), now it’s the 9th year in retirement ...