Military Review

American attack aircraft A-10 Thunderbolt II take on Estonian air base Emari

83
On your page in Facebook The representative of the Estonian Air Force Command (and in Estonia there are Air Forces consisting of 8 aircraft, two of which are leased, several headquarters and airfields) Jaak Tarien wrote that the US will deploy several of their military aircraft at Ämari Air Base. We are talking about the American A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft. Tarien reports that the reports that appeared earlier in the press that the Americans decided to deploy their aircraft in Estonia are true.


American attack aircraft A-10 Thunderbolt II take on Estonian air base Emari


It should be recalled that earlier the US Air Force Command stated that the A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft would be deployed "to one of the European aviation bases." Now it has become known that the Estonian Emari will become such a base (at least one of them).

Estonian edition Postemees trying to explain the emergence of American military aircraft in Estonia:

The United States is helping to strengthen security at a time when Russia continues its aggressive actions in Ukraine.


The first A-10 aircraft appeared in Émari today - 21 September 2015 of the year.

At the moment, the airspace of Estonia and other Baltic republics is “guarded” by Air Force missions from various NATO countries. The “guard” is, of course, conducted against the “aggression of Russia”. But after all, in essence, the finding of the American military in Estonia and the control of its airspace by European air forces is the real occupation, which Tallinn for some reason prefers to keep quiet about today.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sever.56
    sever.56 21 September 2015 14: 01 New
    +14
    Well, here’s another goal for the Iskanders in Estonia - Emari ...
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 21 September 2015 14: 04 New
      +19
      They are covering bastards from all sides ... And we are doing things in Syria!
      1. katalonec2014
        katalonec2014 21 September 2015 14: 15 New
        +9
        It’s more likely to calm the “partners”; we won’t scare us with warts.
        1. saturn.mmm
          saturn.mmm 21 September 2015 15: 16 New
          +4
          Quote: katalonec2014
          It’s more likely to calm the “partners”; we won’t scare us with warts.

          To reassure partners, NATO troops are on the verge of Peter.
          An excursion into history.
          Estonia has almost never been a fully free country. She was always under someone. Although, in principle, to say that “under someone” will not be entirely true. The Estonian people simply did not have their own statehood, there was not even a self-name. Old Estonian maarahvas is translated simply as “peasants” or “village”, because the cities in Estonia were built exclusively by occupiers. Estonia managed to capture the crusaders of the Teutonic Order, and the Danes, and Swedes, and even the Poles and Lithuanians (together) - the southern part, for a short time.
          This country also participated, since Ivan the Terrible managed to take the oath of the population of a number of towns during the Livonian War (about which a whole chest with letters was preserved), and Peter I bought it without any bargaining for a certain number of gold efimks from the Swedes, exactly like the rest of the Baltic lands (despite the war won). It is on such a powerful foundation, dear Ann, that Estonian inseparability rests.
    2. Sergey-8848
      Sergey-8848 21 September 2015 14: 07 New
      +10
      The target, of course, is necessary, like any airfield of a potential enemy. But outdated A-10 attack aircraft are no longer needed even by the owners themselves. It is simply unprofitable to drive them home, so let the Estonians now look after them and spend their own money, proud that they are the first outpost against the “Russian threat”.
      1. marlin1203
        marlin1203 21 September 2015 14: 12 New
        +6
        They were going to write off these “Warthogs” in general. Although as an A-10 attack aircraft is good. The cannon is such a beast! We have an analogue - SU-25, a real workhorse. The last hope of the infantry. soldier
        1. Reducer
          Reducer 21 September 2015 14: 19 New
          +29
          What is it? Fast Estonian guys parked ?!
          1. Dmitrij Volodin
            Dmitrij Volodin 21 September 2015 14: 34 New
            +5
            Also drew attention! laughing Seen already raked on the snobel!
          2. figwam
            figwam 21 September 2015 14: 44 New
            0
            It seems he is after an accident.
          3. lukewarm
            lukewarm 21 September 2015 15: 28 New
            +1
            Not. These are babies. Which is under the wing now. Cleaning lady. With a mop, she flew out of the cab.
          4. Afinogen
            Afinogen 21 September 2015 15: 41 New
            +2
            Quote: Reduktor
            What is it? Fast Estonian guys parked?



            Most likely I ran into a bird, if I parked then the cannon hit, it sticks forward.
            1. Reducer
              Reducer 21 September 2015 16: 32 New
              +1
              At looking about what to park smile
          5. Shuttle
            Shuttle 21 September 2015 17: 59 New
            0
            Quote: Reduktor
            What is it? Fast Estonian guys parked ?!

            This is a dent from a collision with a bird. On planes, this does not happen. Just an old plane. It’s been flying for a long time. And the dent has been painted over for a long time, t.s. does not affect flight speed.

            http://kosmos-x.net.ru/news/nlo_pomjal_nos_kitajskomu_samoletu/2013-06-16-2274

            http://www.yaplakal.com/forum2/topic800833.html


            http://ofigenno.cc/ptica-sdelala-vmyatiny-v-boinge
        2. mishaia_23
          mishaia_23 21 September 2015 14: 24 New
          0
          Our Su-25 is better than many TTX
      2. good_soul
        good_soul 21 September 2015 14: 37 New
        -1
        Some show off. They will not have time to fly up!
        1. lukewarm
          lukewarm 21 September 2015 15: 29 New
          +1
          Well, sobsna give on the aerodrome "Tornado." And yes, they won’t.
      3. dauria
        dauria 21 September 2015 14: 39 New
        +13
        obsolete A-10 attack aircraft are no longer needed even by the owners themselves


        In fact, the typewriter is correctly arranged. Honestly, at one time I was expecting something similar to the A-25 instead of the SU-10. Dual-circuit engines spaced from simultaneous defeat, the exhaust is “cold” and shielded by a stabilizer and keels. Access to replace the engines is excellent. The track of the chassis is wide. The wing is thick and strong. And the armor and the gun are my respect. There is no radar survey of the earth, well, ours doesn’t. Here is a lower speed. What they are, what our guided by, I don't know. He is not out of date, what else can you come up with for an attack aircraft?
        1. wild
          wild 21 September 2015 14: 45 New
          -4
          And what do you actually have after the rook ??? Their warthog where really fought then ??? Just do not give an example Iraq, I belittle you.
        2. Amurets
          Amurets 21 September 2015 17: 04 New
          +2
          The attack aircraft does not really need speed, especially if there is no radar of view and the sighting station can be put easier.
        3. basmach
          basmach 21 September 2015 18: 58 New
          +1
          Actually, no. When a rocket is blown up near the engines, the likelihood of two defeats increases immediately (in Sushka they are spaced apart in the fuselage and armored, I saw a photo from Afghanistan Su with a right-wing engine dislodged in the trash, both would probably crash on the A-10). The stabilizer can not shield the exhaust. I don’t see LD, which is already a significant minus. The pneumatics are narrow and, most importantly, the front pillar is shifted to the right. In our school, there was an experimental Su-25 with a displaced strut to the right (the gun was supposed to be in the center — it didn’t go into the series — they said that it would lead to the landing when landing) So narrow pneumatics and a displaced strut indicate that it cannot be used from the field (read unpaved) aerodromes, which is unacceptable for an attack aircraft (according to the norms of the USSR Air Force, attack aircraft had to be based at a distance of 50-60 km from the front line, where there is not always concrete)
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 21 September 2015 14: 10 New
      +7
      And Russia in Syria is deploying a mixed air regiment

      Span of IL-76 accompanied by Su-30SM

      Span of IL-76 accompanied by Su-24
      1. wow
        wow 21 September 2015 14: 24 New
        +1
        Beauties !!! Keep it up !
      2. avt
        avt 21 September 2015 14: 35 New
        +4
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        Span of IL-76 accompanied by Su-30SM

        Shoots - Allu by the bar testament at the sight of ,, Russia " laughing Well, if there really were four 30chki sent there, that is, they have an excuse to score. Right away, the Israeli prime minister flew in from the chief of staff, probably rubbing the graters - will you fly yourself, or will you give the Syrians back? But to roll 30 a piece on the ground, and scare potential friends in the air - is a noble cause. laughing
      3. Samaritan
        Samaritan 21 September 2015 14: 38 New
        +6
        They zaminusuyut ... but damn it, we send planes to Syria to protect the Arabs, but it is impossible to Novorossiya ... America does not allow ...
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 21 September 2015 14: 47 New
          +7
          Quote: Samaritan
          They zaminusuyut ... but damn it, we send planes to Syria to protect the Arabs, but it is impossible to Novorossiya ... America does not allow ...

          Well, what kind of nonsense is that? So far we are not a recognized country here, and we do not have an agreement on military assistance with Russia. It would be better if we were part of Russia at all, but this requires a third referendum on joining Russia.
          1. avt
            avt 21 September 2015 16: 00 New
            +2
            Quote: Samaritan
            we send planes to Syria to protect the Arabs, but you can’t go to Novorossia ...

            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            So far we are not a recognized country here, and we do not have an agreement on military assistance with Russia.

            But somehow the sky covered itself somehow magically. wassat Now, if somehow someone from the places would buy some not standing in service ....... Well, at least a dozen Ka-50 hulls and somewhere at some kind of locomotive plant upgraded them, well, of course, stole ,, Motor Sich "two dozen engines ...... I would not be surprised and even glad of such an economic approach and ingenuity. laughing
            Quote: Lord of the Sith
            but this requires a third referendum on joining Russia.

            request Unfortunately for one referendum, well, so that NO ONE DRAWLED AS IN THE CRIMEA DE YURO SMALL! Alas, Russia cannot hold the Kosovo precedent - there is no such media resource. BUT - if it is possible to LEGITIMIZE the authorities in the republics, to which all, in fact, Minsk was directed - to FORCE the Kiev people to speak directly with Donetsk and Lugansk, then yes - you can crank it out. But as you yourself observe, Kiev already does not recognize the elections and refuses to conduct direct negotiations, even this Kuchma signs the documents - “the second president of Ukraine” - that is, ANY pensioner can sign, that’s all the legal value to these “documents”, so far only the guarantors somehow manage to keep Petsyu in the stall. request
          2. Samaritan
            Samaritan 21 September 2015 16: 05 New
            +2
            With all due respect, but you are Russians, or rather WE are Russians, and most importantly, to protect your people and your land ... otherwise why live!
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. siberalt
      siberalt 21 September 2015 14: 11 New
      0
      Question for experts. If an unidentified Tornado beats at the airfield with these airplanes, will they have time to take off? laughing
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 21 September 2015 14: 14 New
        +2
        Quote: siberalt
        Question for experts. If an unidentified Tornado beats at the airfield with these airplanes, will they have time to take off? laughing

        Missing .... But Iskander-M is quite.
      2. good_soul
        good_soul 21 September 2015 14: 40 New
        0
        Enough 2 pieces of betab-500 per lane.
        1. nikcris
          nikcris 21 September 2015 15: 00 New
          +2
          Will not be enough. A bulldozer will arrive and bury it in a couple of minutes. This I as a friend of the bulldozer know you. Then the construction workers will come running and throw iron sockets on the funnels. Voila!
    6. NEXUS
      NEXUS 21 September 2015 15: 08 New
      +1
      Quote: sever.56
      Well, here’s another goal for the Iskanders in Estonia - Emari ...

      Not Iskander, but Verb, Tungusok with Carapace, the same Kraukha ... hi
  2. bmv04636
    bmv04636 21 September 2015 14: 02 New
    +9
    Not all flowerbed trampled not still sucked "great warriors light elves" laughing Not all labuses from democrats in one place.
    And is he cheesy?
    1. good_soul
      good_soul 21 September 2015 14: 43 New
      0
      Stand back-left on the flight is removed.
  3. kostyan77708
    kostyan77708 21 September 2015 14: 05 New
    +3
    ugly plane as for me!
    1. Tor5
      Tor5 21 September 2015 15: 00 New
      -3
      yeah, on earth he is scary. Interestingly, this stuff can fly into the air?
      1. 0255
        0255 21 September 2015 16: 56 New
        +1
        Quote: Tor5
        yeah, on earth he is scary. Interestingly, this stuff can fly into the air?

        Will be able
      2. lukewarm
        lukewarm 22 September 2015 08: 13 New
        0
        Unfortunately. And very much so.
    2. opus
      opus 22 September 2015 02: 32 New
      0
      Quote: kostyan77708
      ugly plane as for me!

      Come on?







      [Img][/ Img]
  4. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 21 September 2015 14: 05 New
    +6
    But, in fact, the presence of the American military in Estonia and the control of its airspace by the air forces of European states is the real occupation, which Tallinn today prefers to keep quiet about for some reason.


    They would try to blather something about it, so they would rob it from the overseas master that the "Soviet occupation" would seem like a paradise.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 21 September 2015 17: 15 New
      0
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      They’d try to blather something about it, they’ll rob it from the overseas host,


      Reminds a joke:
      The husband comes home and finds a used rubber product under the bed. "Well, what is this? How dare you? You are disgusting."
      Wife sniffling: "And you yourself? And Katka, and Lizka, and Nonka ...".
      Husband, raising his eyebrows: "So you are also a doo. When I ****, then we ****, and when you ****, then we ****, Well how did it come about? " bully
  5. Thomas
    Thomas 21 September 2015 14: 07 New
    +3
    I wonder what kind of dent is in the bow of the attack aircraft in the photo?
    Was the blonde parking? laughing
    1. marlin1203
      marlin1203 21 September 2015 14: 13 New
      +1
      Repairing the radar ... quick ... laughing
  6. kil 31
    kil 31 21 September 2015 14: 07 New
    +3
    You can see a good attack aircraft. As we are with 25. Striped do not refuse him, the same old man is being modernized.
    1. katalonec2014
      katalonec2014 21 September 2015 14: 14 New
      +1
      There was infa that a tender was announced to replace it, but when it is asked another question, how many F-35s are already bringing ...
  7. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 21 September 2015 14: 10 New
    +6
    The United States is helping to strengthen security at a time when Russia continues its aggressive actions in Ukraine.


    I honestly laugh. Not even a few stormtroopers (experts say the A-10 Thunderbolt II, a pretty good car) will not do any weather, and play the role of sedative pills for the Baltic states. I laugh at how this is presented to local Aborigines, is it really that everything is so neglected that politicians, even dwarf states, are so limited and the people are duped by tolerance and other benefits of Western civilization?

    Type I laugh a lot laughing laughing laughing
  8. K-50
    K-50 21 September 2015 14: 11 New
    +8
    The United States is helping to strengthen security at a time when Russia continues its aggressive actions in Ukraine.

    Yes Yes! laughing
    This is because Russia does not come out of wars around the world since the beginning of the last century laughing
    If this “peace consolidation” didn’t exist, how many civilians would have to live and live, how many cities and villages would survive, how much calmer it would be to live.
    Yes, only all this comes around in mattress, already its inhabitants will have to suffer from the "peacefulness" of neighbors and other countries.
    What measure you measure, the same measure you measure! am
  9. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 21 September 2015 14: 11 New
    +2
    Declaring their independence, some former Soviet republics in fact turned out to be just prostitutes, whom the West uses as he wants, when he wants and how much he wants.
    Estonia, which placed American aircraft at its base, was held hostage by other people's ambitions.
    Recall that the states never leave the place where they were allowed to go once, does not allow the poor mind to understand what they are exposing the country to retaliation.
  10. Meh-forester
    Meh-forester 21 September 2015 14: 11 New
    +1
    Well, here are the "damn crosses" at our borders, reappeared ... Anxious.
  11. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 21 September 2015 14: 16 New
    0
    Who would tell the labs that the Americans never fly away from once inhabited places and therefore should not show a pig's delight!
    1. lukewarm
      lukewarm 21 September 2015 15: 33 New
      0
      Estonian whores work flew. Although they have terrible ladies ...
  12. sergej30003
    sergej30003 21 September 2015 14: 19 New
    0
    What a hysteria about the fact that we delivered planes against the Isil terrorists, and the silence in the media that the United States is transferring its attack aircraft to our borders, they obviously do not mind our neighbors
  13. Yarik
    Yarik 21 September 2015 14: 22 New
    0
    A little fresher than the P-47 Thunderbolt wassat
  14. Geser
    Geser 21 September 2015 14: 33 New
    +3
    Thunderbolt is only suitable when the enemy does not have air defense equipment, then he can shoot with impunity. And even Shilka will erase it into powder, not to mention Tunguska, Tor or Shell. As for our Su-25, it, unlike the "warthog," passed such a school of fighting in Afghanistan as the American never dreamed of. Our Rooks were shot even from above, they could withstand a hit from the Stinger. And the fire power of the Su-25 is much greater than that of the Thunderbolt. It is interesting to learn how these “warthogs” showed themselves in Afghanistan, how much their Americans lost during their entire presence in Afghanistan.
    1. nikcris
      nikcris 21 September 2015 14: 39 New
      +8
      Drying fire power is noticeably lower. I’m telling you like a real patriot. But drying is survivable)))
      1. Geser
        Geser 21 September 2015 15: 04 New
        0
        That's why if they offer me a choice, I will choose the Su-25. It is more armored and maneuverable than the Thunderbolt. So the chances of survival in battle are much higher.
      2. NOMADE
        NOMADE 21 September 2015 15: 59 New
        0
        here I am about the same;)
    2. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 September 2015 14: 39 New
      +3
      In vain you are so, A-10 is a very good attack aircraft. True, he has one feature unlike our Su-25. The A-10 is actually built around its 7-barrel gun. Neither remove nor replace with a new one is impossible. And since with the advent of MANPADS and quick-fire anti-aircraft guns, cannon attacks became a direct route to the ground for him, the Americans can equip him with missile and bomb weapons. And he carries a gun with him. Often without ammunition.
      1. Manager
        Manager 21 September 2015 15: 14 New
        +2
        Oh, what a spectacular gun!
        In any case, I like the warthog! Do not let not take!
      2. opus
        opus 22 September 2015 02: 22 New
        0
        Quote: Wedmak
        The A-10 is actually built around its 7-barrel gun.

        GAU-8 Avenger was created SPECIALLY for A-10, previously A-10 (pre-production) had M61 Vulcan


        Quote: Wedmak
        Neither remove nor replace with a new one is impossible.

        change.



        trunks and mechanisms 100%
    3. Engineer
      Engineer 21 September 2015 14: 40 New
      +5
      Due to what is more firepower? In the rifle, it is definitely weaker. In the front hemisphere, A-10 engines are covered by wings, and the Su-25 suffers more from the same Shilka. So that does not need to be invented. Here we had a project of a flying tank, which is really better than the A-10
      1. Wedmak
        Wedmak 21 September 2015 14: 43 New
        +1
        Due to what is more firepower?

        1 × 30-mm GAU-8 / A seven-barreled gun with 1350 30 × 173 mm cartridges against one double-barreled 30-mm GSh-30-2 double-barreled gun. Stupidly more volley weight.
        1. Engineer
          Engineer 21 September 2015 14: 48 New
          +1
          Why are you writing this to me? I know it. I asked my opponent why he believes that the Su-25 has more firepower.
          1. Wedmak
            Wedmak 21 September 2015 14: 51 New
            +1
            Missed a little. It happens. )))
      2. NOMADE
        NOMADE 21 September 2015 16: 15 New
        0
        Yes, it was a good option. but a lot - but. ((originally, there was the concept of a light front-line attack aircraft .. that did not materialize and gradually grew into - su -25. but this is a separate and interesting story.
    4. good_soul
      good_soul 21 September 2015 14: 50 New
      0
      I agree to 100 pounds!
    5. NOMADE
      NOMADE 21 September 2015 15: 57 New
      +4
      Let’s do it without "Urya !!" Yes, our su-25s are good, but that's a different class. a warthog is a plane / glider around an excellent cannon (gau 7 like) that shoots shells from depleted uranium. he was made against our tank troops (t54, 62, etc.). By the way, he also showed good survivability in "local" wars. This is a very serious and strong device, especially with modernization. it’s good that this amount is not even enough at all, it’s “the psychology of support for the allies”)) now, if they were several times more with the support of fighters, etc., then yes, there would be a rather serious local danger.
      and so, the attack aircraft itself is very good!
  15. nikcris
    nikcris 21 September 2015 14: 37 New
    -2
    Nice plane. It goes astray. Although the engines are "behind". It helps from missiles, but not from snows.
    1. opus
      opus 22 September 2015 02: 30 New
      +1
      Quote: nikcris
      It helps from missiles, but not from snows.


      almost incredible durability: it is able to fly, even losing a third of the wing, half of the tail and one of the two engines





      the plane under the control of a female pilot Kim Campbell suffered serious damage (hydraulic system failure, one engine was damaged, hundreds of holes in the fuselage, wing and tail of the car), but was able to reach its own airfield. After the completion of the active phase of hostilities and the beginning of the partisan war, A-10 aircraft continued their sorties.
  16. doc67
    doc67 21 September 2015 14: 40 New
    +1
    What a powerful air force Estonia has! If you combine them with the Latvian and Lithuanian air forces, and even your American friends will drop some flying junk, and even if you rent a few more planes, then they can withstand such powerful powers as Sierra Lyon or even Papua New Guinea!
  17. Makarov
    Makarov 21 September 2015 14: 40 New
    +1
    A good car, but it needs serious support, both in the sky and from the earth, otherwise it is a coffin ...
  18. Oman 47
    Oman 47 21 September 2015 14: 41 New
    +2
    Well, with NATO fighters it’s more or less clear yet, but why the bull kunk in Great Sprat?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 21 September 2015 14: 45 New
      +1
      but what the bull kunk in Great Spratia STORMMARKS ???

      Someone must protect the strategic reserves of sprats.
    2. lukewarm
      lukewarm 21 September 2015 15: 36 New
      +1
      From Russian armored tanks, wi sho! laughing
  19. Babai Balkan
    Babai Balkan 21 September 2015 14: 44 New
    0
    Americans push old stuff, beg for money for updates, and labuses pay them ...
  20. bmv04636
    bmv04636 21 September 2015 14: 57 New
    +4

    Rook Su-25 can fly without one engine
    1. NOMADE
      NOMADE 21 September 2015 16: 09 New
      0
      I agree, an excellent attack aircraft but also a -10, it can also. Comparison of these machines is not entirely appropriate, since there are different weight approaches, and schools. well, obi cars are good. Su -25 - “Muhach” (lightweight ...), and -10 - (heavy ..)))
    2. nikcris
      nikcris 21 September 2015 20: 59 New
      0
      although it’s not yours, but thanks anyway.
  21. Sargaras
    Sargaras 21 September 2015 14: 59 New
    +1
    Quote: marlin1203
    They were going to write off these “Warthogs” in general. Although as an A-10 attack aircraft is good. The cannon is such a beast! We have an analogue - SU-25, a real workhorse. The last hope of the infantry. soldier


    I read that the recoil of the gun is such that it compensates for the thrust of one engine.
  22. kursk87
    kursk87 21 September 2015 15: 36 New
    0
    I hope Russian air defense will properly meet American villains
  23. Maksus
    Maksus 21 September 2015 15: 51 New
    0
    Strange, after the appearance of shock drones, there was information about the decommissioning of the A-10. And now they are thrown forward again, are they afraid of our electronic warfare? That's right, it’s not to drive bare-headed illiterate Arabs through the desert.
  24. 31rus
    31rus 21 September 2015 16: 06 New
    0
    It’s just a few A-10s, just to indicate the presence, that you don’t need an Iskander, you don’t need a Tornado, if something serious starts, they will be taken to the rear, for a simple reason, our fighters will not leave the slightest chance or destroy air defense
  25. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 21 September 2015 16: 23 New
    0
    A-10go cannon shoots farther and more accurately than GS-2-30 and can withstand long-term firing without overheating. And about the need for such a tool, time will tell. I think without such a tool it was possible to add other, more useful options. The gun and its return to PPC eat up weight!
  26. NDR-791
    NDR-791 21 September 2015 17: 33 New
    0
    Tarien reports that press reports earlier that the Americans decided to deploy their planes in Estonia are true.
    12 aircraft (squadron) and 300 people for their maintenance. Che too much man. But actually they say it correctly, it’s just a “concern” for the younger brother, so that they would cry less. And about yourself, your beloved - so that Congress would see that you can’t cut the budget in any way. But one squadron doesn’t do any weather. That their 8 was heterogeneous, that 20 would become even more diverse.
  27. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 21 September 2015 17: 34 New
    +1
    4 Russian helicopters in Syria, thousands of kilometers from the US guard, Russian aggression, a threat to security around the world. 10 attack aircraft in Estonia, on the border with Russia, strengthening the security and stability of the world. Enrages already from this amersky logic and bustle of the Baltic states limotrophs.
  28. lobik
    lobik 21 September 2015 21: 23 New
    0
    About three weeks ago, they flew over my dwelling. The eye height was 300 meters, in pairs, and one at a time (it seems that they sat down in Lielvards, there was our former military airfield, the NATO type expanded and upgraded. I was struck by a very strong whistling of the engines (not a hum, namely a whistle ) I saw the planes only three minutes after the appearance of the svsta. Another size hit (very large, almost like the SU-27).