Military Review

"The age of refugees!"

76
Every time has its own tales! One, that the proletariat will acquire the whole world (modestly silent, that its sociopaths will lead with a university degree), the other about universal tolerance (as a result, again turned out to be tolerance "West vs East"). But what about the economy? She is somehow forgotten about her in the frenzy phrases. They forget that at one time they read in the materials of EVERY Congress of the CPSU (b) - the CPSU, as if some kind of conspiracy: to raise the productivity of labor, to raise, to raise, to raise !!! They are still there, these collections-bricks with their materials - you can open it and make sure. And then it will become clear that the USSR lost, above all, not the political race, that “treason”, “deception of the people”, “spy in power” were nothing to do with it. We just never, in the words of Lenin, have never shown it, the highest labor productivity in comparison with capitalism! That is, all the years of Soviet power, we consumed more than we earned.


But the fact that not only we live this way is understood by very many. They understand (oh, these mythical “they”, you can’t do without them!) That the reserves for raising productivity of labor will not last forever either! For example, the Greeks in ancient Greece could have lived better, but they simply burned the surplus of their GDP, giving it to the gods! 100 bulls were sacrificed immediately. It was called hecatomb! And would not bring? Before them, the people of the culture of "battle axes" threw them into the swamp! Make and hurl! Or put in the grave! And if not put?

"The age of refugees!"
Flying helicopter house for refugees


Civilized people burn the bulls or put laptops in the graves, as it were, and not from the hand. So they came up with another - to accumulate mountains weapons! They do not drink it, do not eat it, but skillfully kindled xenophobia makes it produce and store!

The problem arose when the atomic weapon appeared. How many do not save it - you will not be stronger than a certain level, but total destruction is guaranteed to you! And the arms race immediately made a new round - precision weapons. You don’t need much of it, but it is available only to countries with high labor productivity! More precisely, a weapon is more difficult, and you will not make it on your knee anymore. New technologies in weapons - new technologies in everyday life, and again someone in front, and someone in ... this very hole. And it is with a hole that the example is very significant. In the USA, the production of chemical explosives was sharply increased at the end of the 30s. And already in 1939, Tampax tampons, in which fluff pulp was used, were invented in other countries to produce pyroxylin. Well, why we did not buy a license for their production in the same 1939 year? And our women ... oh, what they didn’t put in only for themselves in “these days” ... “The main thing in taking care of your neighbor is not to overdo it!” - so what? As a result, the West and its well-groomed life have become very attractive for many! And then there's the economy and - here's your grandmother and 1991 year!

And now we see how right before our eyes a new “economic miracle” is born, namely, the management of the world (and an increase in labor productivity) through ... the organization of a massive flow of refugees! Someone sees a policy behind all this, and she, of course, is there. But the economy is much more important! Refugees should be fed (do not feed not humanely!), Give them shelter, bedding, education, “pour them into their economy” and let them work a lot and cheaply. It seems that heavy physical labor lowers labor productivity? Yes lowers, but only in part. After all, if there are plants where this level is very high, then they still cannot produce more than a certain amount! Simply put, vacuum trucks always need more than professors. So they will do all the "hard work with their hands." Elite - to think, and robots - to produce!

Again, this was not invented today or in the Old World or in the States. The idea belonged to the ancient Incas! They conquered the territory of modern Chile and realized that there were a lot of tribes, that they would not have enough power to keep, and ... wisely they decided to arrange the problem of refugees specifically! Began to "shuffle" as a deck of cards the population of their country - the inhabitants of one village were relocated to another part of the country, sometimes hundreds of kilometers away. There all the conditions - land, livestock, huts - were the same as in their homeland. But in the neighboring village, people spoke the language of the Yarmara tribe, in another Yoruba, and they themselves spoke the language of multi-penti. That is, they could not come to terms and rebel! Clothes, utensils - all this was given to them on behalf of the Supreme Inca, and he took all of this from the “monasteries” of the most beautiful girls - “Brides of the Sun”, who were engaged only in this, that it was all produced!

Today, of course, it is easier for people to settle in other countries. But ... mobile communication can be turned off, people are threatened with deportation and they will live for years, decades, as it should, but at the same time consume! That is, a high level of production in this country is guaranteed, and there is no need to burn any bulls!

Well, for the elite, those who are free from those who come in will have plenty of room! Sensitively guided by the need of "higher" architects and elite engineers have already begun to submit their development for those who do not want to live next to the "color". And for the “colored ones”, as an option, exporting them from distressed areas is, of course, not free, but for very big money.

I won’t be surprised if the price of donor organs plummets in Europe very soon. And why? I think that any modern person himself will easily answer this question!

Under the "sauce" of care for the refugees and respect for their rights, the luminaries of science began to use all the latest scientific discoveries allegedly "exclusively for peaceful purposes." For example, the discovery of a supernova of graphene allowed us to create materials that are lightweight, but at the same time have high strength. This discovery has allowed to implement the most daring projects. And such discoveries, as is known, work primarily for the defense industry.

A characteristic sign of the last century was the construction of the airship "Graf Zeppelin". Its length was 236,6 m, payload - 25 tons. For 9 years of operation, the airship made 590 flights around the globe. In terms of comfort, "Graf Zeppelin" exceeded at that time many aircraft. For example, passengers were offered ten double cabins, all with sleeping places, washrooms, separate bathrooms and even ... a grand piano. The windows of the cabins and cabin were slightly tilted, but this did not affect the view of the beautiful views from the height of the flight. The possibilities of the kitchen were also not small: over fifty passengers would be provided with food and drink for several days. In addition, Graf Zeppelin offered mail services. Smoking on board the airship was banned because it was fueled with flammable bla-gas, which made the ship extremely fire-hazardous. But for the convenience of smokers, a special metal-clad room with an exhaust hood was set aside. In general, the airship could well claim the title of "flying hotel" or "flying house", which in the case of some large-scale disaster could be used as a mobile comfortable temporary accommodation. Unfortunately, its flammability, extreme sensitivity to the weather, especially to thunderstorms, difficulty landing and, as a consequence, the inability to use such a device for a long stay.

But today, as an alternative to the airship, you can take a huge helicopter. At the end of 1977, the world's largest transport helicopter Mi-26 was released. The helicopter is able to take on more 80 fighters, weapons, and when used as ambulance transport it can carry about 60 wounded. The helicopter's payload is about 20 tons. Mi-xnumx. MI-26 - the only helicopter that can take on board heavy equipment. On his account 26 world records.

The Mi-12 (or B-12) helicopter, which flew back in the 1967 year, is still striking in its size. The wingspan of the helicopter is 67 m. Passenger capacity - 196 people. The helicopter can lift cargo to 44 tons, and accelerate to 260 km / h.

And now imagine that this helicopter is made of carbon fiber, materials based on graphene oxide or of anilized carbon. Its density is 0,16 mg / cm3, which makes products made from this material the lightest in the world, with extraordinary strength. A sheet of graphene, with a thickness of only polyethylene film, can withstand a tremendous weight - several tons! And if you suddenly need to build a mobile housing from such material - it is quite real. It will be possible to build a vehicle, such as a Mi-12 helicopter, but with a much larger fuselage the size of a good hotel. And perhaps even more so than the "Graf Zeppelin".


Graphene will not crush a flower!

Of course, utility rooms, compartments, cabins will be narrow and not very comfortable in such a helicopter, but it will have everything you need for a comfortable stay, and most importantly - it will be really super mobile housing. Such roads are not terrible, because only airways will be needed. Yes, and special platforms for overclocking is not needed. Equipment of such enormous dimensions, having 4 decks, will be able to take on board up to 1000 people and deliver them to any, even the most inaccessible corner of the globe. And besides difficult to reach, there are in fact also exotic places where travel lovers and vivid impressions are not averse to being. They are usually ready to pay any money for such unusual flights. And if you use a helicopter as a mini-hotel of a luxury class, then a large capacity will not play a decisive role. But it is possible to transport refugees again on it! I collected five thousand euros from my nose and - “The company“ Pay and fly ”guarantees you a calm and fast relocation to anywhere in the world!”


Corridor inside the helicopter hotel.

That is, such a machine can primarily be used to transport passengers from dangerous areas to safe ones. Ticket price will pay for everything! Natural disasters, military conflicts - these are exactly the situations where home-helicopters are simply needed. And for refugees it will be just a salvation. People who have lost a roof over their heads, left with nothing, will be insanely happy for such a flying dwelling. One thing is clear that such machines have a great future. Mankind is not insured against catastrophes, too, against wars. People who have fallen into such situations need at least some kind of shelter, giving them a sense of security, peace and security. And the warmth and the ability to cook food. That is why the creation of such machines is VERY FAVORABLE!

So, the “century of refugees” is coming, which will become another attempt of humanity to keep up, or even more to raise the level of labor productivity due to the sharp differentiation of social and national composition of different countries and migration of the population in conditions when it reproduces uncontrollably in some places and catastrophically decreases in others. Well, and the technology for this century will also be adjusted. Do you think this is “taking care of your neighbor”? No, it's just business and nothing more!
Author:
76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prosto_rgb
    prosto_rgb 23 September 2015 06: 21
    +12
    For the listing of modern materials (which are developed and produced mainly by countries of the decaying west) of course +.
    But the idea of ​​a helicopter-hotel is somehow commercially unprofitable suspicious or what?
    Anyway, a helicopter is a means of transportation from point "A" to point "B" with the possibility of vertical take-off and landing.
    The hotel is a temporary residence for tourists.
    A helicopter hotel is akin to nano-bolts from Chubais.

    The illustration is certainly beautiful, but how much will it cost to develop such a thing, is it certainly a big "?"
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. War and Peace
      War and Peace 23 September 2015 11: 14
      +6
      Well, the author thinks rather categories of paradoxes than facts

      It’s just that we never, never, in the words of Lenin, have shown the highest labor productivity in comparison with capitalism! That is, all the years of Soviet power we consumed more than we earned.



      "did not show advanced labor productivity"? but this is not true, our people ALWAYS showed the HIGHEST LABOR PRODUCTIVITY both before the war and after. It was under Stalin that labor productivity on socialist construction sites was the highest, our people showed high productivity when fulfilling the GOELRO plan, when creating entire INDUSTRIES of industry, which was not in tsarist Russia, 8.5 thousand factories were built and put into operation before the war, which cannot be explained neither tyranny, nor exploitation, nor delusional stuffing about "low productivity". The nuclear industry was raised from scratch, and the impulse given by Stalin was such that the nuclear industry in Russia is the best in the world so far.
      If we “consumed more than we earned,” then there would be no socialist cities with a million inhabitants, there would be no Dneproges and there would be no won war, because the armless people, according to the author of this article, could not produce tanks, on the grounds that the costs for the production of tanks, they will have to destroy production relations, but this is a lie, we agreed to create the best tank and establish MASS PRODUCTION - which is a synonym for labor productivity, and in the production process such an indicator as COST has always decreased, which also speaks of HIGH PRODUCTIVITY LABOR. For example, in Germany and the rest of Europe, they could not achieve our productivity and produce as many weapons as the war required, and this is what says that productivity in the USSR was the highest. The financial system of the Stalinist USSR was very effective and stable.

      But what about the economy? In the frenzy of crackling phrases, they somehow forget about it. They forget that at one time they read in the materials of EVERY Congress of the CPSU (B.) - the CPSU, like a conspiracy of some kind: to raise labor productivity, raise, raise, raise !!! They still exist, these collections of bricks with their materials - you can open and make sure. And then it will become clear that the USSR lost, first of all, not a political race, that “betrayal”, “deception of the people”, “spy in power” had nothing to do with it.


      The Soviet period should ALWAYS be divided into periods corresponding to the rulers of the USSR. The Stalinist approach to economics also set the speed of translational motion and the direction of movement, and this direction is CORRECT. Another thing is that not everyone wanted to move in the right direction, there were frank enemies — Trotsky — he would destroy, there were hidden enemies — Khrushchev, there were renegades and traitors — Brezhnev in which the DIRECT course to our VICTORY was leveled and replaced by senseless yaw or a policy of slogans instead a direction to a policy of real labor.
      Then there was only a betrayal of Stalin’s course towards a social state, the author who is involved in the craft of a historian intentionally does not tell the truth, which in fact is the main purpose of academic istoiography-to mislead people ...
      1. kalibr
        23 September 2015 11: 55
        -7
        Are you illiterate? Lift your ass and march to the library, and there are documents from the Congress of the military-industrial complex (b) and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. And they contain texts: what Stalin himself said, what other general secretaries said. In addition, labor productivity is different: you can effectively saw boards for a wooden Yak-1 and stamp parts from duralumin for Tinderbolt. And if Germany, in your opinion, could not show productivity higher than ours - yes, right! - then the USA overtook the USSR in all indicators of the production of tanks, ships, aircraft and everything else! So once again - open it and read it yourself!
        By the way, your last accusation is absolutely delusional. "To tell the truth ..." So I say - who wants to know, open and read. Or do you think I learned it from somewhere else? In an extrasensory way, probably! I hope that there are still more smart people here - they will understand me.
        1. War and Peace
          War and Peace 23 September 2015 12: 32
          +4
          Quote: kalibr
          Are you illiterate? Raise your ass and the library step march, and there documents Congresses of the military-industrial complex (b) and the Communist Party. And there are texts in them: what Stalin himself said, what other general secretaries said.


          say one thing and do another, and so under Stalin there was more to it than words, but then on the contrary ...

          Quote: kalibr
          In addition, labor productivity is different: you can effectively saw boards for a wooden Yak-1 and stamp parts from duralumin for Tinderbolt.


          and again you are wrong, firstly, the processing of DELTA-WOOD from which almost all of our aircraft of those times were made, in addition to "sawing", includes such operations as MILLING, drilling, pressing, heat treatment, drilling, not to mention the production of motors - this is the highest aerobatics of mechanical engineering and such samples as yak3, la7 say that our wooden planes were able to beat German -metal ones, and all-metal English Harikeins were bad and not loved by our pilots - this is what concerns only the quality of the planes. But the LABOR PRODUCTIVITY was such that we could produce TENS OF THOUSAND airplanes - this just speaks of high productivity.

          Quote: kalibr
          boards for the wooden Yak-1 and stamping duralumin parts for "Tinderbolt".


          Thunderbolt by the way ...

          Quote: kalibr
          then the USA overtook the USSR in all indicators of the production of tanks, ships, aircraft and everything else! So again - open and read for yourself!


          Well, you are a historian, why are you telling a falsehood? The number of t34 was the MASSEST, the most massive aircraft was Il2, and the amers became the most massive aircraft, Sesna was a very military aircraft, the PPSh VICTORY weapons were made 6.5 mil. Pieces, and the amers Tommigan made no more than 1.5 mil., Not to mention about the best Sudaev assault rifle, of which 600 thousand pieces were produced.
          1. shishkin7676
            shishkin7676 23 September 2015 13: 27
            -8
            By the way, Hurricane is marked in the reference book as "Messerschmitt Killer" ie most of the 35 thousand messengers on his account.
            1. dudinets
              dudinets 23 September 2015 14: 19
              +3
              I don’t know what reference book you read, but I read the memoirs of fighter pilots. there is a lot of unflattering about Hurricanes said.
              1. kalibr
                23 September 2015 19: 42
                -1
                And I read the newspaper Pravda for 1941 a year and there the reviews are very good ...
              2. shishkin7676
                shishkin7676 24 September 2015 08: 16
                -2
                It was in the magazine Modelist-Constructor, and I also read the memoirs, V. Karpov is a writer, hero, he told on TV how the memoirs were edited, Karpov wrote how they stumbled into the kitchen and ate all the rice and meat, and he was told to fix it, they say the porridge was fresh, that they remembered their own, rich and German turned over .... On the Zvezda channel, they still sniff that the GAZ 67 (on Ford nodes in 1928) was better than the 1940 jeep (Ford), they say, three centers heavier and ... !!!!! ????
          2. kalibr
            23 September 2015 18: 52
            -3
            Not true There are more tanks, more planes, ships and which ones (! 0 more at times. Or not! PPSH - well, thank God, at least in some ways. And is this an indicator of the advantage of our economy? And what about aircraft carriers?
            1. Glot
              Glot 23 September 2015 19: 26
              +1
              And if you count on aircraft carriers?


              Here it’s not even worth arguing. They had many more aircraft carriers.
              But, nevertheless, geographically they needed them more than we were. All the same, from overseas "to carry democracy" without airborne groups, destroyers alone are more difficult. )) So the emphasis was on aircraft carriers. And we had a different strategy.
              But yes, on aircraft carriers we lost a lot and very much. Yes, and not cheap aircraft carrier.
              1. kalibr
                23 September 2015 19: 58
                -3
                Correctly! And we needed PPSh. But what is technologically more difficult? Riveting PPSh or build aircraft carriers?
                1. Glot
                  Glot 23 September 2015 20: 11
                  +2
                  Correctly! And we needed PPSh. But what is technologically more difficult? Riveting PPSh or build aircraft carriers?


                  All the same, PaPaShu and the aircraft carrier should not be compared. )))
                  They were riveted to be healthy, and they still serve here, here and there. Like the same thirty-four. Although they, thirty-four, I think, no longer serve. Last burned in the nineties. Nevertheless, they served for a long time.
                  And our military technology was roughly keeping pace with the Western ones. Military precisely. Somewhere yielding, somewhere ahead of or slightly different but, keeping pace with the enemy.
                  1. kalibr
                    23 September 2015 20: 21
                    0
                    Nobody argues with this. somewhere we are, in some ways ... But we often had to catch up, right? It doesn’t matter why - the legacy of tsarism is hard, the war or something ... but it was necessary. And they often caught up at the expense of natural wealth, rather than high productivity and advanced technologies.
                    1. Glot
                      Glot 23 September 2015 20: 33
                      +2
                      And they often caught up at the expense of natural resources, rather than high labor productivity and advanced technologies.


                      Duc Country then we, booloshaya, was boogaty. )))
                      As there, the song sang:
                      - Broad my native country
                      There are many forests, fields and rivers in it ...
                      But, the weapons we did were good. Reliable. Yes, and now too. I think. )))
          3. kalibr
            23 September 2015 19: 01
            0
            And then what kind of delta wood was that something made there? Almost ALL OUR AIRCRAFT? Are you drunk or a fool? Delta wood was used to make LaGG - "Lacquered guaranteed coffin" = that's what the pilots called it. And then ... the resins were imported, and when they were replaced by ours at the beginning of the war, in the cold this "wood" began to crack. That is why LaGG was discontinued. And the rest of the planes were equipped with ordinary pine, steel pipes and American duralumin. I thought everyone already knew that ...
            1. REZMovec
              REZMovec 23 September 2015 19: 46
              +1
              Well, about LaGG-3 was discontinued - it's you, Vyacheslav went too far. LaGGI aircraft were manufactured at the Tbilisi aircraft plant until the end of 1944 - the planes went mostly to air defense regiments, where they were considered quite powerful interceptors - a volley from all firing points was breaking any German bomber to pieces.
              1. kalibr
                23 September 2015 20: 00
                -3
                I'm not an aviator, sorry. I can refer only to the books of aircraft designer Yakovlev "Stories of an aircraft designer" and "The Purpose of Life". In them - so. You can check. As the saying goes, what they are rich with is what they are happy about.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. War and Peace
          War and Peace 23 September 2015 13: 16
          +3
          More about our "low labor productivity" due to which the USSR collapsed.
          Recently I just learned, learned with surprise that the Stalinist USSR, in which, as we know, "cybernetics was banned" was the world leader in the creation of ELECTRONIC COMPUTERS. Stalin not only did not prohibit "cybernetics", but also stood at the origins of the creation of institutes, where scientific teams created the world's first computers.
          In 1948, Lebedev, director of the Institute of Electrical Engineering near Kiev, independently of Neumann, developed and subsequently implemented the principles of building computers and memory.
          Subsequently, a small computer was created in 1950, and in 1955 a computer was already a LARGE MACHINE. Then there were several more institutes in the USSR specializing in the development of computers in Kazan, Kiev, Minsk, Yerevan, Leningrad, Penza, Moscow

          е
          everywhere there were collectives creating new technology, and we are told by the "official history" that "cybernetics was the corrupt girl of capitalism"?
          http://www.kramola.info/vesti/protivostojanie/sovetskaja-vychislitelnaja-tehnika


          -istorija-vzleta-i-zabvenija
          in those days people
          they lived poorly (war), but fun, everyone worked willingly, with enthusiasm, with great return, with great productivity ...

          MEM-1950G
          1. kalibr
            23 September 2015 19: 41
            0
            As for cybernetics, read the newspaper Pravda, the organ of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. For a communist, the USSR was not more important than a source of information. Political information in the shops began with the reading of Pravda, lecturers of the OK KPSS referred to its editorials ... And you refer to some site. This is not serious!
        5. Nagaibak
          Nagaibak 23 September 2015 13: 31
          +5
          kalibr "then the USA overtook the USSR in all indicators of the production of tanks, ships, aircraft and everything else! So once again - open and read for yourself!"
          This despite the fact that there was no war in the United States, there was no evacuation of enterprises. Well do not overtake that. But the Germans would have burnt the east coast of the United States at least (to be absolutely clear) and then we would have looked at their labor productivity.)))
          1. kalibr
            23 September 2015 19: 05
            0
            It is clear that it was not, but the level was still higher. And you start "would", and "would" is not an argument. Consider what is, is not it?
            1. Sling cutter
              Sling cutter 24 September 2015 01: 53
              0
              My personal minus to you!
              and here is this quote:

              Japanese billionaire Herosi Terawama:


              “You are not talking about the main thing, about your leading role in the world. In 1939, you Russians were smart, and we Japanese were fools. In 1949, you became even smarter, and we were fools so far. And in 1955 we got smarter, and you turned into five-year-olds.

              Our entire economic system is almost completely copied from yours, with the only difference being that we have capitalism, private producers, and we have never achieved more than 15% growth, while you, with public ownership of the means of production, reached 30% or more. All of our firms have your slogans of the Stalin era. ”
              1. kalibr
                24 September 2015 06: 35
                0
                And what is this talking about? That our productivity was higher than in the US? In 1950, Japan was on the level of economic development on a par with Egypt!
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. Nagaibak
              Nagaibak 24 September 2015 07: 04
              0
              kalibr "It is clear that it was not, but the level was still higher. And you start" would ", but" would "is not an argument. We consider that is, is not it?"
              If you answered me. That is how you can generally compare a warring country and a country not affected by hostilities. What are you speaking about? What if yes?
        6. ivanzu87
          ivanzu87 23 September 2015 15: 14
          +3
          Quote: kalibr
          In addition, labor productivity is different: you can effectively saw boards for a wooden Yak-1 and stamp parts from duralumin for Tinderbolt. And if Germany, in your opinion, could not show productivity higher than ours - yes, right! - then the USA overtook the USSR in all indicators of the production of tanks, ships, aircraft and everything else! So once again - open and read for yourself!

          Hmm, a rink of war passed across the territory of the USA, the factories had to be evacuated thousands of kilometers away, the deposits of resources were under occupation, there weren’t enough working hands for the children, and the women stood at the machine tools.
          1. Bayonet
            Bayonet 23 September 2015 19: 47
            0
            Quote: ivanzu87
            Hmm, a rink of war passed across the territory of the USA, the factories had to be evacuated thousands of kilometers away, the deposits of resources were under occupation, there weren’t enough working hands for the children, and the women stood at the machine tools.

            More than 19 million women worked in US manufacturing facilities during the war. Although child labor was banned in the United States before the war, adolescents were also involved in production. Accordingly, the legislation on child labor has changed again. Many teenagers, out of patriotic feelings, the desire to quickly become adults, dropped out of school and went to work for defense enterprises. From 1940 to 1944 the number of workers under the age of 19 increased by 1,9 million.
            1. Bayonet
              Bayonet 23 September 2015 22: 38
              +2
              Quote: Bayonet

              More than 19 million women worked in US manufacturing facilities during the war.

              You put at least a hundred minuses (it’s better on your forehead), and what happened was what happened! fool
        7. prosto_rgb
          prosto_rgb 24 September 2015 01: 07
          +3
          Quote: kalibr
          I hope that there are still more smart people here - they will understand me.

          There really are quite a lot of smart people here, and not just smart ones, but also those wise by life experience, here they will understand you.
          But there are even more stubborn Urayapatriots, but they will not understand you.
          hi
          1. kalibr
            24 September 2015 06: 55
            +1
            Yeah, I’m already convinced of this. But on the other hand, they are also citizens of Russia, they can choose and be elected. And the fact that they don’t know something or have wrong ideas about something is not their fault, but their misfortune. It was not without reason that there was also material about PR, which, however, did not attract such attention. And after all, everything is painted on how you can manage people. And just people with an insufficient level of generalization and knowledge are especially easy to manage.
            1. Bayonet
              Bayonet 24 September 2015 07: 14
              +1
              Quote: kalibr
              And just people with an insufficient level of generalization and knowledge are especially easy to manage.

              Not just easy, but they simply get lost without this very management and they certainly need a LEAD!
      2. shishkin7676
        shishkin7676 23 September 2015 13: 23
        -7
        It seems that you confused labor productivity with something else, for example, with production. Under the tsar, the Russian worker produced two times less than the American, after the revolution and before the bankruptcy of the USSR, three times less. In the 80s, the USSR smelted steel twice as much as the USA, factories and workers in the USSR had three times as many, can you imagine how much they could do? and in fact, cars were sold to the people 25 times less, the same picture in agriculture 2% of the US population fed well, the country, and we have almost 100 million rural people could not feed the USSR, and if Lenin dreamed of 100 thousand tractors, the USSR gave the collective farms have twice as many tractors (500 thousand) than the USA and plus two more for each tractor in the form of spare parts, what is the drought of 1/6 of the land for 73 years? And Germany, having three times as much industry as the USSR, produced fewer tanks and planes, and why? only one out of four workers worked on the Eastern Front, and three on the Western Front. Shelter for submarines 6 meters thick is a costly affair! factories under the earth transferred, a little expensive. etc.
        1. War and Peace
          War and Peace 23 September 2015 13: 41
          +3
          you don’t seem to understand what LABOR PRODUCTIVITY is.
          Quote: shishkin7676
          before the bankruptcy of the USSR three times less.


          what period do you take? Brezhnevsky? even in this period, the production of weapons was very productive and ahead of the capitalist factories, well, the civilian sector was gradually ruined by the followers of Stalin ...

          Quote: shishkin7676
          And Germany, having three times as much industry as the USSR,


          Well, firstly not Germany, but all of Europe, they worked for Germany ...

          Quote: shishkin7676
          produced fewer tanks and planes, and why? only one out of four workers worked on the Eastern Front, and three on the Western Front. Shelter for submarines 6 meters thick is a costly affair! factories under the earth transferred, a little expensive. etc.


          Well, this is a lie, and the most disgusting, it was on the Eastern Front that 80% of all German divisions were ground down, along with their "productive" equipment ...
          1. kalibr
            24 September 2015 07: 02
            +1
            Here is a stupid fomenkoid caught! He wrote to you not about divisions, but about the fact that the Germans were forced under the blows of British bombers to build underground factories, expensive shelters for submarines, and all this instead of riveting weapons. Fighting on the Eastern Front and "working on the Western Front" are DIFFERENT THINGS !!! Finally?
          2. shishkin7676
            shishkin7676 24 September 2015 08: 20
            0
            Then we must admit that the main contribution to the victory was made by the Chinese 35 million died. (Lenin said that the country's military power is determined by the economy)
        2. ivanzu87
          ivanzu87 23 September 2015 15: 18
          0
          Dear, stop repeating the liberal stories of the 90s.
          You look stupid. There is no desire to debunk your myth-making, or rather "myth repetition"
          1. kalibr
            23 September 2015 19: 50
            -2
            Ivanushka, cool down! The person wrote everything correctly and these are not tales. If it were stories we would still live in the USSR!
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. War and Peace
      War and Peace 23 September 2015 12: 50
      0
      And it is with the hole that the example is very revealing. In the USA, in the late 30s, the production of chemical explosives was sharply increased. And already in 1939, Tampax tampons were invented, where fluff pulp went, used in other countries for the production of pyroxylin.


      cotton wool or what? and that our women did not use cotton wool? laughing

      Well, why didn’t we buy a license for their production in the same 1939? And our women ... oh, what they just did not attach to themselves in "these days" ... "The main thing in caring for your neighbor is not to overdo it!" - so what? But in the end, the West and its well-groomed life have become very attractive to many! And then there is the economy and - here’s your grandmother and 1991!


      Well, yes, our women HAVE NOT HUNGED TAMPAXES FOR YEARS, but ALWAYS used cotton and other materials and always our Russian people were the most healthy and prolific, which is what the space on which Russia spans ...
      1. kalibr
        23 September 2015 19: 08
        -1
        In fact, some are wiped with a mug! And nothing!
        And you tell women about cotton wool, and suggest again to return to it ... saving, however! They will tell you ...
        1. Glot
          Glot 23 September 2015 19: 50
          +2
          In fact, some are wiped with a mug! And nothing!


          Hmm ... Others and rub well with stones. )) For two years I looked at this picture, that women, that men. A pebble is rounder than a rapaazzzz and, done. )))
          So burdock, this is civilization. ))))
      2. Glot
        Glot 23 September 2015 19: 48
        0
        Well, yes, our women HAVE NOT HUNGED TAMPAXES FOR YEARS, but ALWAYS used cotton and other materials and always our Russian people were the most healthy and prolific, which is what the space on which Russia spans ...


        And everyone else, HUNDREDS OF YEARS used tampaks or something? )))
        And about fertility ... The space on which this or that Country is located does not affect fertility, or vice versa - fertility does not affect spaces. Here is Wed Take Asian countries, or the East as a whole. And now we have such fertility, as much as demographic collapse. )))
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 20: 09
          -1
          For this I will tell you an interesting story for you and for everyone. One of my colleagues (he wrote about this in the newspaper "Penza Gubernskaya Gazeta" in 2000) had a grandmother in the occupation in Belarus. And when the Germans entered her village, the first thing in the courtyards where they settled began to build "strange wooden booths." At night, one of the local Komsomol members sneaked in to see what this "military object" was. And there ... the hole smells! And the people understood that they were ... At first I was surprised, because 41 years old, and then I remembered - Sholokhov, "Virgin Soil Upturned", grandfather Shchukar, ate meat and his malakhai stuck out over the wattle fence ... That is, it was. But what is this? Our fault? No trouble! And why should we perceive this backwardness as ... something sacred? Always focus on the best.
          1. Glot
            Glot 23 September 2015 20: 27
            +2
            I will tell you an interesting story for you and for everyone.


            Well, in general, I even believe it.
            I can tell you too. From personal.
            The second half of the 80s, somewhere in the South ...
            We landed at a new "point". On the third, fourth day, the question arose - where to go for big? Small things are easier, well, not so difficult. But by and large. In general, everyone here is adults, the children are already asleep, so, frankly, they started to litter everything around, they decided to make a toilet.
            Our starley, Vanyukin (Last name changed) says:
            - Here you dig a hole - and pointed to a place not far from the tent - put across two boards, here is the toilet!
            No sooner said than done.
            A pit a meter and a half deep was dug. It did not go deeper, the soil is heavy. )) Across a couple of boards and that’s it.
            Not only do you sit down, you can be seen from everywhere, so also the boards are shaking, you can't even keep your balance and ... well, in general, it is clear, yes, that "I". ))))
            And nothing went. While the pit to the boards almost filled.
            And then. Then Vanyukin was removed, and replaced with a cap. Well, he ordered to make a toilet by all the rules, a booth with a door, etc.
            But it was so. ))))
            1. kalibr
              23 September 2015 20: 47
              0
              Very funny! Thanks! But somewhere I even saw a photo in some old magazine of such boards across the pit. Now I don’t remember where, but I saw it. So the invention is old!
              1. Glot
                Glot 23 September 2015 20: 53
                0
                Very funny! Thanks! But somewhere I even saw a photo in some old magazine of such boards across the pit. Now I don’t remember where, but I saw it. So the invention is old!


                Not at all. )))
                It was certainly not invented by our oldies. ))) But sometimes, no matter how much time has passed, and some things do not change. )))
            2. Bayonet
              Bayonet 23 September 2015 22: 36
              0
              Quote: Glot
              so also the boards walk with a shaker, you won’t be able to keep your balance and

              And a couple more across these to kill the tyma was not enough? And then after all, they will scatter and ... smile
              1. Glot
                Glot 23 September 2015 22: 41
                +1
                And a couple more across these to kill the tyma was not enough? And then after all, they will scatter and ...


                Yes, there were no sensible advisers. )))
                Well, without sarcasm, in the mountains, every board is worth its weight in gold. Where to get them from? These two were thrown by the nearest "board" and thanks for that.
                Then, later, the cap specialist already threw out boards for building a normal need. But that's another story. )))
                1. Bayonet
                  Bayonet 23 September 2015 22: 42
                  +1
                  Quote: Glot
                  Where to get them from?

                  Then another thing! hi
                  1. Glot
                    Glot 23 September 2015 22: 49
                    0
                    Then another thing!


                    But here it is like, all from people. One knocked out 20 boards, the other “composed” out of two. ))
                    Although, we did not complain. )))
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. rosarioagro
    rosarioagro 23 September 2015 07: 54
    +8
    "... That is, all the years of Soviet power, we consumed more than we earned."

    This is now so, we consume more than we earn, therefore we get on credit, under the Soviet regime it was somewhat the other way around
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 09: 10
      -6
      Meaning the country as a whole, not individual citizens ... In 1977, I came to the teacher in the same village near Penza. There was a state farm and it was supposed to be the state-woo 250 thousand rubles. A year later, 500, then 700, and when I was leaving the debt reached 1 million, and no one was worried. Everyone was paid a salary, bonuses, although the teachers did not write out the meat, only on the day of the teacher and 1 May. Is it possible that life is in debt?
      1. dudinets
        dudinets 23 September 2015 14: 32
        +3
        writing off debts of agricultural enterprises is one of the forms of subsidizing agriculture. otherwise, how could the state farm pay a decent salary to workers without raising product prices? The Soviet Union was a huge single corporation in which the loss-making of some units was more than paid for by the incomes of other, more profitable ones.
        the difference between the tasks of the capitalist and the socialist state:
        capitalist seeks profit
        socialist - meeting the needs of society.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 19: 10
          +1
          You are right, only the debts of some idlers were written off by the industriousness of others. I do not like this. I do not want to work for fools! And then what did our socialists fail to satisfy the needs of society from jeans to cars?
        2. Bayonet
          Bayonet 23 September 2015 22: 41
          +1
          Quote: Dudinets
          in which the loss-making of some units more than paid for the income of others,

          Who does not work, he eats!
      2. alicante11
        alicante11 23 September 2015 15: 12
        -1
        This refers to the country as a whole, and not to individual citizens ...


        There was a state farm and it was supposed to state 250 thousand rubles. A year later, 500, then 700, and when I left the debt reached 1 million and no one was worried.


        First, it’s not true. The collective farm could not be "state-woo". Simply because the collective farm did not have its own money. He received all the money from the state.
        Secondly, what do you judge by one collective farm about the whole country?

        Regarding labor productivity, it would be necessary for our friends in the West to remain silent. We have very different climatic conditions - this time. It takes a lot of capital investments for frost-resistant structures and heating, which, of course, makes our production less competitive. Secondly, it turns out that the worker in the USSR worked less time and had more leisure and rest. Which is also wealth, although from the point of view of the capitalist, no, because it does not bring profit. So it’s better to produce a little less, but work for life, and not live for work.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 19: 36
          0
          I don’t know how he could - he could not, the partog told me about this. And I was not used to lying to people unknown to me!
        2. shishkin7676
          shishkin7676 24 September 2015 12: 09
          0
          You’ve been 25 years late about the climate, Cuba, S. Korea proved that the climate has nothing to do with it, and I see in Altai that the fields have decreased, the number of collective farmers has decreased sharply, and the yield has increased, and productivity has jumped, now it’s fashionable to blame everything The United States, they use climate weapons, they send them bugs. And labor productivity is measured by the amount of product produced per unit of time.
  3. inkass_98
    inkass_98 23 September 2015 08: 14
    +2
    I agree with a colleague prosto_rgb. It makes no sense to involve a helicopter in the resettlement of refugees, in this regard it is much easier to use a regular ferry or cruise ship. A helicopter is a much more specific machine, and its cost under current conditions and when using the materials proposed by the author will compete with the same ocean liner, with incomparable capacity and level of comfort.
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 09: 11
      -2
      That's it - expensive! But who will pay for it? If the state, the less expensive - the better, is it not clear?
  4. RomanS
    RomanS 23 September 2015 09: 14
    +3
    Somehow humor is not funny ... Everything is dumped in a heap. And the author clearly has no experience communicating with real refugees / migrant workers.
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 09: 57
      0
      And where does the experience of communication with refugees. Anyone who will make such a car will think about something completely different! The Age of Refugees is a business. Is it really necessary to explain?
  5. IS-80
    IS-80 23 September 2015 10: 08
    +9
    The first thought after reading - Kaptsov shared the grass with Shpakovsky?
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 11: 56
      -3
      The first thought after reading the comment: another drew ... Makar-humorist.
      1. IS-80
        IS-80 23 September 2015 12: 11
        +4
        Quote: kalibr
        The first thought after reading the comment: another drew ... humorist.

        And what did you want to say with your article? And then you have mixed horses, people, a bad bad socialist economy, labor productivity, ancient Greeks, battle axes in a swamp, Incas, Count Zeppelin and refugees in helicopters from graphene.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 12: 14
          -4
          We look at the problem from different points of view. Success is in an integrated approach.
          1. IS-80
            IS-80 23 September 2015 12: 48
            +4
            Quote: kalibr
            We look at the problem from different points of view. Success is in an integrated approach.

            What is the integrated approach? In the extremely muddy rationale for building another Laputa reincarnation? In the phantasmagoric tale of increasing labor productivity through the use of refugee labor in heavy manual labor? In the tales that throughout the years of Soviet power we consumed more than we earned? In excursions into the history of ancient and not so? You got an extremely messy and incoherent article.
            1. kalibr
              23 September 2015 19: 34
              0
              This is not a reason to write about grass. We are not children, right?
  6. dmb
    dmb 23 September 2015 10: 16
    +6
    Well, now I understand why in 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed as a socio-political system - the "sworn commies" did not want to build a "helicopter-hotel". Let me remind you that the author, after giving some lessons in the village (apparently for a short time) and convinced of the viciousness of the socialist economic system, went to the university to teach the History of the CPSU. Well, apparently in order to further facilitate the transition to progressive capitalism and the construction of "helicopter hotels". More advanced comrades-in-arms of the author (Yakovlev and Tsipko) in the fight even made their way to the Central Committee.
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 12: 02
      -6
      Three years, which was required by law after studying at a university, that is, I gave my debt to my Motherland in full and paid for my studies. And yes, he taught the history of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1982 to 91, worked on many interesting archives and ... was shocked when he got acquainted with a number of cases. In 1988, I already realized that everything would fall apart. But I thought it was 95th year. Alas, I was wrong. Apparently, I read the documents of the wrong level. And at the university I did what was supposed to. How else? Snitches were in all groups, think not? Just try "tell me wrong" ... And the fact that the market economy turned out to be more effective than ours and there is nothing to prove ...
      I see you the hotel helicopter tore. But this is just an example of how changes in specific socio-economic conditions affect the emergence of various projects. I emphasize: I did not invent it!
      1. dmb
        dmb 23 September 2015 12: 16
        +1
        No, the helicopter did not blow up much, but the justification for its absence by the wrong socio-political structure amused a lot. By the way, in the Soviet period in the most interesting magazine "Tekhnika-molodezh" and not such projects were published. True, their necessity was justified by the interests of the entire human society, and not a handful of the nouveau riche, but for the former teachers of ML, this is rather a disadvantage, not an advantage. In general, I am amazed at your courage, it’s like you, after the shock experienced in 1988, for three more years, overpowering yourself continued to inspire students that socialism is the society of the future.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 12: 26
          0
          The point is not courage, but the fact that I and many were people of the system. Where to go? And the salary, and the family, which must be maintained? And then people always hope for the best. So I thought, maybe I’m wrong ... After all, you also didn’t go to the barricades and forests to the partisans of socialism in the 91
    2. kalibr
      23 September 2015 12: 22
      -3
      "There was a state farm there and it owed the state 250 thousand rubles. A year later, 500, then 700, and when I left the debt reached 1 million and no one was worried. Everyone received a salary, bonuses, although teachers were not prescribed meat, only on Teacher's Day and May 1 ". And there were many! I look at the files of the OK KPSS of the Penza region in the party archive. The radio plant reports on the release of defense products. 1962, Cuban Missile Crisis ... 80% of radio fuses are defective. Out of 27 guidance stations, 7 were accepted by military acceptance. Of the 5 brigades of Communist Labor, 2 fell apart due to drunkenness! What is it like? High labor productivity? Request an archive, if you don't believe me, they will prepare a certificate for you.

      Wow, two minuses! Well, now, for sure, this report will be withdrawn from the archive to please the "comrades". And there won't be this bad information!
      1. dmb
        dmb 23 September 2015 14: 19
        +5
        And they didn’t try back to school, and they would teach themselves the history of the ancient world to children, and not what you said was contrary to your beliefs. As for me in 1991 and later, what I could do, I think not enough, I could do more. However, the beliefs like stale socks have not changed, and do not change. By the way, the family was also far from in the favorable conditions of the Penza region, but in conditions of war. The low level of labor productivity is an occasion to change socialism to capitalism, well then why be surprised that members of the CPSU did not come to the defense when they had such teachers. It is difficult to name these members really communists.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 19: 19
          -1
          Beliefs change depending on the information received, did it occur to you? Today you know one thing, then you learn another and ... you change your thoughts and behavior. Lenin, too, initially believed that the victory of the proletarian revolution in one country was impossible. And then he changed his mind, although A. Bogdanov pointed out the inconsistency of this idea in his novel "The Red Star". And in general: a fish seeks where it is deeper, and a person - where it is better. And that's okay! And to school with a Ph.D. diploma? Yes, you have a headache or something? Each person strives for the best, to the limits of his capabilities and this is his duty to society, by the way!
          You honestly write to me: "I could have more." Why should I "be able" more. The role of a kind uncle should not be advised!
          1. dmb
            dmb 23 September 2015 20: 19
            +2
            Listen, well, it's not serious to substitute concepts. It does not paint you. Lenin never changed his views on the inevitability of a change in economic formations, and a change in assessments and methods of achieving this goal does not at all mean a change in his convictions. In your case, (excuse me as it is) the absence of "sausage" personally for you actually changes your beliefs. Isn't it too small for a person "striving to the limits of his capabilities and fulfilling his obligations to society." I think society would be much more useful if you taught, but to hell with him, not at school, at the university, but not the history of the Communist Party. ps By the way, the candidate of pedagogical sciences and one of the founders of Soviet pedagogy, Sukhomlinsky, taught at the district school until the end of his life. He also apparently had a headache. I have the honor.
            1. kalibr
              23 September 2015 20: 36
              0
              That is, he did not argue with Bogdanov and did not introduce changes to Marxism? Believe me, I have read all the multi-volume collected works. It was a daily bread. And he taught the history of the CPSU as required. And it's not about the sausage, which I did not have alone. And in getting to know different documents and materials, there are a lot of things ... And as for your example with the founder, who likes what: who is the pop, who is the priest, who is the daughter of the priest.
        2. kalibr
          23 September 2015 19: 27
          0
          Oh, by the way, are you from Pyatigorsk? I love this city, I only spent 24 days with you. And I read all your articles - good ones. That is, all of you about labor productivity and party entrance documents must understand. So what's the deal?
  7. Glot
    Glot 23 September 2015 11: 03
    +2
    From below, millions of slaves are swarming, working for fifteen to twenty hours a day at the owners who soar in the sky, in comfortable domocopters.
    Such is the picture of the future of Europe, or of the whole World ...
    Or vice versa. Who knows ... ))
  8. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 23 September 2015 12: 24
    +2
    What kind of nonsense? What is the article about ?!
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 12: 31
      -1
      The fact that changing socio-economic conditions in society led and is leading to the development and appearance of new technological solutions aimed not only at meeting the needs of the majority, but also the first of the very minority.
      1. IS-80
        IS-80 23 September 2015 13: 05
        0
        Quote: kalibr
        . Am I spelling out?

        Available. Thanks, Cap.
        1. kalibr
          23 September 2015 19: 56
          0
          You see - you write thanks. And someone slapped a minus for the same words. I am not against the minus, but it means no one is available !!! It would be necessary to motivate, huh? What do you think?
  9. Olezhek
    Olezhek 23 September 2015 15: 49
    +5
    And then it will become clear that the USSR lost, above all, not the political race, that “treason”, “deception of the people”, “spy in power” were nothing to do with it. We just never, in the words of Lenin, have never shown it, the highest labor productivity in comparison with capitalism! That is, all the years of Soviet power, we consumed more than we earned.


    It's funny. In fact, it was the USSR, unlike the United States, who lived on "their own" and did not stir up any financial fraud.
    We lived not rich - but this is how we earned ..
    The heyday of the American economy - 50-ies 20 th century if someone does not know ..
    Then they did EVERYTHING from a needle to an airliner ..
    Then the recession began ...

    It's just that today the United States got into such debt that the "old men from the Politburo" never dreamed of ... sad
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 22: 57
      0
      That is, their labor productivity is now lower than ours, right?
      1. Olezhek
        Olezhek 24 September 2015 09: 13
        0
        real labor productivity is difficult enough to count today.
        Against the background of the "new economy"
        1. Olezhek
          Olezhek 24 September 2015 10: 25
          0
          In general, the difference in labor productivity in the USSR and the USA was
          BUT not at times.
          And by tens of percent.
          The US controlled global finance / trade.
          The topic is a large separate ...
          And now the USA has huge accumulated debts - the reason is the difference between the standard of living and REAL labor productivity ..
          Behind this theme to the legendary Adventurer ...
          1. kalibr
            24 September 2015 11: 04
            0
            No, it’s not difficult! The average salary in the country and the cost of advertising on 1 citizen. In Russia, 9 dollars or so, in Switzerland 325 - for advertising. Well, the salary, respectively.
            1. Olezhek
              Olezhek 24 September 2015 13: 17
              0
              No, it is not difficult! The average salary in the country and the cost of advertising on a citizen 1


              Colleague economics is always difficult.
              Sometimes even harder than nuclear physics ..
              So cho - for this you need to kill a lot of time, health, read a lot of smart books.
              Simple solutions are for viewers of the Field of Miracles.
  10. Olezhek
    Olezhek 23 September 2015 15: 52
    +1
    Again, this was not invented today or in the Old World or in the States. The idea belonged to the ancient Incas! They conquered the territory of modern Chile and realized that there were a lot of tribes, that they would not have enough power to keep, and ... wisely they decided to arrange the problem of refugees specifically!


    Suddenly I will surprise the author - it was invented by the ischo - the Assyrians - and they became famous ... that they "shuffled" the conquered peoples like a deck of cards ... am
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 19: 29
      0
      I forgot about the Assyrians. The Inca example has always been somehow closer to me. And the book of Kuzmishchev was interestingly written.
  11. pv1005
    pv1005 23 September 2015 20: 59
    +1
    The author is "ordinary balabol", and even seemingly offended by life. People like him profuked the USSR, they were looking for where they could better feed, and they give them clothes. He himself was harder than a spoon when he was born, but he teaches everyone what and how, an expert in all fields from hygiene of the female body to aircraft construction, that is, in nothing. negative
    1. kalibr
      23 September 2015 22: 51
      -1
      I, Pasha, don't teach anyone. Don't know about hygiene - don't respect yourself, right? I don't know the aircraft industry, but I read the books of the aircraft designer Yakovlev, which I honestly wrote about! I'm not offended by life, why did you decide? On the contrary, I'm fine. 35 books in the USSR, Russia, England and Germany - have you looked at the profile? Interesting work ... including here. And all my students draw such faces. Writing texts is hard ... And you, Pasha, of course, stood for the USSR, and still eat in the garbage, where is it better to feed what to look for? Do you transfer all the money to the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, and buy only Russian-made clothes? Besides, maybe you are an active partisan - a "fighter against the regime"?
  12. psiho117
    psiho117 24 September 2015 02: 22
    0
    what does this mediocre article do in the "Armament" section? admins, where are you looking?
    1. kalibr
      24 September 2015 06: 42
      -1
      Dima, a deep meaning is not immediately recognized! Who are you at all, besides that from Donetsk? In Donetsk, people with different levels of education and intelligence also live.
  13. Olezhek
    Olezhek 24 September 2015 12: 42
    +2
    Flying helicopter home for refugees ..........
    And now imagine that this helicopter is made of carbon fiber, materials based on graphene oxide or of anilized carbon. Its density is 0,16 mg / cm3 ................


    Pasans - all of you did not SO understand ...
    This is a kind of - cyber-punk / memories of the future ..
    ".. The inhabitants of the city of N-ska lived their usual lives - no one expected an ambush ..
    As in the sky, the humming sound of a bumblebee flock was heard in the sky, the sound grew from him laying ears ...
    The spring sun was shielded by numerous beefy black carcasses of vintoletes decorated with
    white Arabic script ...
    It's them !!!!!!
    !!!
    Nomads !!!
    Save yourself who can .... but it was too late to save ...
    A horde of refugees in rotary-wing aircraft surrounded the unfortunate N-sk ... " crying

    From the new fantastic roman ... "Dromedaries of the Dawn" good
  14. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 14 October 2015 19: 24
    +1
    The topic of the article is interesting. Thank you.