Military Review

The representative of the Crimean Tatars in Geneva criticized the internal politics of Kiev

54
The Crimean Tatar people only after the annexation of Crimea to Russia could regain their rights, leader of the public organization Milli Firka (People’s Party) Vasvi Abduraimov said at UN headquarters.




Speaking at a meeting of non-governmental organizations on violations of rights and freedoms in Ukraine, Abduraimov recalled that “as early as the beginning of the 90-s, laws on the rehabilitation of repressed peoples and victims of political repression were adopted in Russia, but the Crimean Tatars during the 23-year stay of Crimea as part of Ukraine, they could not take advantage of the opportunities offered by the Russian legislative framework. ”

"And only after March 2014, we received all the opportunities for the restoration of all violated rights as an ethnic community," - quotes a public figure Look.

“Ukraine at the official level declared itself a unitary state and in every possible way leveled and unified all ethnic and religious communities under the so-called Ukrainian identity,” Abduraimov reminded. “The apotheosis of such a policy was the statement by President Viktor Yushchenko that the state doctrine is the construction of one country, one nation with one language and one faith.”

Currently, "everyone sees what this brainless policy of unification has led to when fundamental human rights are violated."

He noted that "the Kiev-style unification, which is abruptly mixed with the total corruption of officials from the bottom to the top, where it is not the law and the people that rule, but the oligarchs 20, could not but lead to a catastrophe, and it happened." “The Ukrainian state now exists only de jure, but de facto it does not exist,” Abduraimov added.

He expressed confidence that “in 1954, the Crimea was transferred from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR absolutely illegally, because the Crimean Tatars at that time were deprived of their rights in the places of expulsion”.

“And then no one asked either us or the inhabitants of the Crimea, but did they want the Crimea to be transferred to Ukraine,” said the head of Milli Firka.

According to him, “now the West is violating the rights of all residents of the Crimea by imposing restrictions on the peninsula, concerning, in particular, business, foreign travel and tourism”. Crimeans because of these sanctions "can not normally conduct economic activities, which means that the right to development is violated."

Abduraimov pointed out that Western sanctions are "the clearest manifestation of the policy of double standards."

“Announcing sanctions against Russian policy, they actually bind ordinary people hand and foot, preventing them from moving freely and doing business,” he concluded.

In April, Vladimir Putin by his decree rehabilitated the Crimean Tatars, who became the object of Stalin’s deportations at the end of World War II.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 19 September 2015 13: 31 New
    +47
    But Dzhemilev does not even know. crying He wants to help the Crimean Tatar people with a blockade.
    1. Appraiser
      Appraiser 19 September 2015 13: 35 New
      +27
      He wants to help the United States first. Since he is an emissary of the CIA (NSA) of the USA, and people like him do not give a damn about his fellow tribesmen. crying
      1. Hyppopotut
        Hyppopotut 19 September 2015 13: 57 New
        +24
        The USA recalls the Crimean Tatars, as well as other nations, only when it is beneficial to them ...
        1. Throw
          Throw 19 September 2015 14: 26 New
          +33
          Stalin actually saved his “repressions” and the deportation of the Crimean Tatars: after what they did there, working with the Germans, the returning veterans would simply shoot them ...
          1. Awaz
            Awaz 19 September 2015 17: 30 New
            +7
            I completely agree. In addition to the fact that all Crimean Turks drafted into the Red Army deserted (with the possible exception of a few, maybe tens of people), these people, already under occupation (those who deserted), completely sided with the Nazis and took an active part in the fight against partisans. As far as I really don’t know, these “comrades” once had a plan to destroy all the Russians in Yalta, and only the intervention of Wehrmacht officers prevented this tragedy.
          2. cat hippopotamus
            cat hippopotamus 19 September 2015 18: 15 New
            +3
            A controversial issue, however, among them were both heroes of the USSR and participants in the Second World War against fascism, members of the resistance with fascists in the Crimea partisans, and traitors. The fact that they did not support the Soviet regime during the Second World War, it was part of the population, this is a merit of the Bolsheviks, who in the Crimea staged the same repressions as throughout the country. Likewise, in Russia in the occupied territories there were many traitors. But the memory has not yet cooled down and the people were offended by the Soviet regime. Of course, it’s hard to argue now looking at the past, but one thing is clear, if the Bolsheviks did not behave this way during the formation of their power, then maybe there weren’t so many betrayals.
            1. lukke
              lukke 19 September 2015 23: 35 New
              +10
              The fact that they did not support the Soviet regime during the Second World War, it was part of the population, this is a merit of the Bolsheviks, who in the Crimea staged the same repressions as throughout the country.
              May sob ... And you about what "part" you mentioned? If they didn’t like the Soviet power, then why didn’t they please the tsar’s power from the time of Catherine to the 19-20 centuries, which equal all of them to ours and didn’t touch, even after a clear betrayal in the war with Turkey? why did they rob the Reds carts in the Civil War (they didn’t have enough darlings to enter into direct clashes - this is a permanent historical feature of this folk by the way), and Bely ?! for which they seemed to be fighting then? I understand that now it’s probably after the annexation of Crimea it’s not “politically correct”, but as far as I didn’t try to find something good to read about this people, I didn’t find (((
              1. Rarahin
                Rarahin 21 September 2015 19: 15 New
                +2
                To these questions, the Russian people have long given one, but very capacious answer in the saying:
                "IN TATAR SIGHTS NO PROKU" (conscience)
            2. AlexeyL
              AlexeyL 21 September 2015 11: 34 New
              +6
              There is no excuse for betrayal. They betrayed neither power nor government, but lived on their homeland, the land on which they were born. As a result of betrayal, would they become free, independent? - Not!!! They consciously walked under the protectorate of fascist Germany. Those. consciously surrendered their sovereignty, identity into the hands of the occupation government of fascist Germany. First of all, this is a betrayal not only of the Red Army, not only of the Soviet Union, but of their homeland (I would say - abandonment of the homeland). This is happening in our time - for example, Bulgaria, Ukraine, etc.
              And I’ll make one more clarification. Betrayal has names. Not all Crimean Tatars were expelled.
            3. ermolai
              ermolai 22 September 2015 04: 38 New
              +3
              Quote: cat hippo
              But the memory has not yet cooled down and the people were offended by the Soviet regime.

              I'm sorry the hippo cat, but you probably didn’t have Krymchaks in the neighbors, they smile in the eyes if they can’t strangle you here now, but they will arrange muck-dirtyness as soon as possible, these are cunning quirky dirty creatures. zapadentsy they are blunt and dumber. and these like snakes strive to sting stealthily. this is a saying about them: be friends with the tatra, but keep the knife in your bosom.
          3. The comment was deleted.
          4. ermolai
            ermolai 22 September 2015 04: 30 New
            0
            Quote: Lance
            Stalin actually saved his “repressions” and deportation of the Crimean Tatars

            Well, he was wrong, and the GDP is wrong, there is no such nation, there is a community, and this part of the sapies is rather nasty, they hate everyone except their beloved ones.
        2. Karayakupovo
          Karayakupovo 19 September 2015 14: 42 New
          +9
          It would be better if they often recalled their native Indians.
      2. sir.jonn
        sir.jonn 19 September 2015 15: 36 New
        +5
        Quote: Vladimirets
        But Dzhemilev does not even know. crying He wants to help the Crimean Tatar people with a blockade.

        Dzhemilev died and he himself knows about it, all his actions are no more than convulsions.
    2. Finches
      Finches 19 September 2015 13: 36 New
      +23
      Unfortunately, the rotten West hears only what is beneficial for it to hear! But rather, only what it allows Washington to hear! But nevertheless, it is necessary to speak, therefore, Respect Vasvi Abduraimov!
      1. 1goose3
        1goose3 20 September 2015 09: 05 New
        +1
        Unfortunate rotten west

        This phrase is enough to describe the essence of the West. The rest is about the West, in particular.
      2. meriem1
        meriem1 21 September 2015 12: 33 New
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        Unfortunately, the rotten West hears only what is beneficial for it to hear! But rather, only what it allows Washington to hear! But nevertheless, it is necessary to speak, therefore, Respect Vasvi Abduraimov!

        Effective Dude! And he correctly says ... But as always, kaklov has a wider mouth!
    3. ROD VDVshny
      ROD VDVshny 19 September 2015 13: 36 New
      +11
      The actions of Dzhemilev have long been similar to the actions of the official representative of the US State Department ... and it crows like the State Department. And then - at least do not dawn.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 September 2015 13: 39 New
      +15
      Yes, all this dog knows, as well as the fact that the Tatars in Crimea will put him on a stake. He must bark the State Department money so he barks, but he will never voluntarily go to Crimea.
    5. milann
      milann 19 September 2015 13: 53 New
      +9
      Events in Ukraine have clearly shown that one can only spit into the outstretched hand of the West.
    6. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 19 September 2015 14: 28 New
      +4
      But Dzhemilev is also not invited to Geneva tongue
    7. YGV-97219
      YGV-97219 19 September 2015 19: 46 New
      +1
      Yes, this is not something that is not worthy of discussion at all, for it is a complete zero!
    8. Siberian
      Siberian 21 September 2015 17: 08 New
      +2
      For some reason, Transnistria ...
      The Natsiks built checkpoints on the border with Transnistria, proclaiming a food blockade in support of the Crimean Tatars.
  2. WKS
    WKS 19 September 2015 13: 33 New
    +23
    You might think that in the west someone is occupied by the fate of the Crimean Tatars.
    1. Altona
      Altona 19 September 2015 13: 54 New
      +5
      Quote: wks
      You might think that in the west someone is occupied by the fate of the Crimean Tatars.

      ------------------------------
      In the West, few people care about the fate of democracy itself, the "golden billion" wants to rebuild a cozy ark, and the fate of the rest is drummed ...
    2. marlin1203
      marlin1203 19 September 2015 14: 56 New
      0
      And what do they know in the United States, where is Crimea generally located? laughing
    3. mmk
      mmk 19 September 2015 15: 27 New
      +5
      They generally do not care about Islam, but they decided to use the Tatars against Russia, with the help of the eternal bleating of the goat Jemil. If Kiev allocated money to them for rehabilitation, he and Chubarov successfully tricked them among themselves, but it didn’t reach ordinary people, or rather came to a giraffe after the referendum.
  3. sv68
    sv68 19 September 2015 13: 39 New
    +1
    nonsense, now the State Department will declare a violation of the rights of Crimean Jews or cygan
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 19 September 2015 16: 00 New
      +1
      Quote: sv68
      nonsense, now the State Department will claim a violation of rights Crimean Jews or Cygan!!!



      Well, yes ... And about the aggression of Russia against Israel and Romania ... Moldova too ...
  4. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 19 September 2015 13: 40 New
    +9
    Abduraimov correctly said that Ukraine exists only de jure. Only in Russia can people speak any language and practice any religion.
  5. Amurets
    Amurets 19 September 2015 13: 44 New
    +9
    This is the real representative of the Crimean Tatar people. Vasvi Abduraimov correctly spoke about the policy of the Ukrainian authorities. Will they hear or don’t hear it at the UN headquarters? But this is the real opinion of the people, and not remnants like Dzhamilyov or Chubarov representing the Tatar people.
  6. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 19 September 2015 13: 50 New
    +7
    ... brainless politics ...

    You can’t say better!
    But unfortunately, Ukraine is now ruled by even whiter brainless politicians who unleashed a war against their own people. fool
    1. forester
      forester 19 September 2015 14: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: ia-ai00
      ... brainless politics ...

      You can’t say better!
      But unfortunately, Ukraine is now ruled by even whiter brainless politicians who unleashed a war against their own people. fool

      Ukraine is ruled over a large puddle and puppets cannot have brains by definition
  7. Stinger
    Stinger 19 September 2015 13: 56 New
    +2
    “Everyone sees what this mindless policy of unification has led to when fundamental human rights are violated”

    Definition, but only those who look up from America’s ass can see it.
  8. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 19 September 2015 14: 01 New
    +2
    Dzhemilev is sad and is going to block something there.
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 19 September 2015 16: 03 New
      +1
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      Dzhemilev is sad and something going to block there.


      Not something, but someone ... just oppressed Crimean Tatars ...
  9. vobels
    vobels 19 September 2015 14: 03 New
    +1
    ".. The apotheosis of such a policy was the statement of President Viktor Yushchenko that the state doctrine is the construction of one country, one nation with one language and one faith. At present, "everyone sees what this brainless policy of unification has led to when fundamental human rights are violated." Fascist Nazism in action. And we must shout about it from all the stands, including all public organizations. Maybe we’ll get to something, maybe more ordinary people abroad will know about it and somehow influence the government
    1. Alexey RA
      Alexey RA 21 September 2015 19: 18 New
      +1
      Quote: vobels
      ".. The apotheosis of such a policy was the statement of President Viktor Yushchenko that the state doctrine is the construction of one country, one nation with one language and one faith. At present," everyone sees what this brainless policy of unification has led to when fundamental rights are violated of man
      . Fascist Nazism in action.

      He is the most, comrade ... he is the most.
      Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer.
  10. Oman 47
    Oman 47 19 September 2015 14: 13 New
    +3
    So the voice of others, NORMAL Crimean Tatars sounded !!!

    An urgent delegation of them is in PACE, the OSCE and other rotten offices.
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 19 September 2015 16: 04 New
      +2
      Quote: Oman 47
      An urgent delegation of them is in PACE, the OSCE and other rotten offices.



      Hmm ... why ??? There they listen only to those whose barking delights the soul of the sitting ...
  11. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 19 September 2015 14: 15 New
    +8
    I remember a crowd of Tatars near the Crimean parliament .. (they even crushed a couple of people) ... And then they suddenly ran up sharply ...! bully That's what it means to find the right points ... quietly and calmly scattered! bully A brilliant operation was in the Crimea ... Thank you all guys! hi
  12. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 19 September 2015 14: 25 New
    +5
    What a mess right in the ear of “progressive humanity”! laughing
  13. mamont5
    mamont5 19 September 2015 14: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Appraiser
    He wants to help the United States first.

    He wants, first of all, to help himself, by sucking up from the USA.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 19 September 2015 16: 08 New
      0
      Quote: mamont5
      He wants, first of all, to help himself, by sucking up from the USA.


      Not only licks something, but also bites pork chop, like his employers. yes
  14. NKVD
    NKVD 19 September 2015 14: 37 New
    +2
    It would not be necessary to rehabilitate all frenzied
  15. Support
    Support 19 September 2015 14: 40 New
    +2
    Violated rights of the Crimean Tatars? But what about the hero of the USSR Ahmet Khan Sultan? He also had no rights? They, as representatives of non-traditional sexual relations, also squeeze out some kind of rights. Zadolbali these nationalities. In vain, they were not allowed to go into consumption at one time. At least for service in parts of the SS.
  16. Barakuda
    Barakuda 19 September 2015 16: 10 New
    +2
    Who was in Crimea after returning? I have not seen oppressed Tatars there. Of course there are nervous scumbags, but it's like everywhere else.
  17. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 19 September 2015 16: 13 New
    +1
    The Crimean Tatar people only after the annexation of Crimea to Russia could regain their rights, leader of the public organization Milli Firka (People’s Party) Vasvi Abduraimov said at UN headquarters.

    A very serious statement at the UN site, as if we were not ironic, but such statements are difficult to hide and the western inhabitant will be informed to one degree or another that there is the opposite of the official Ukrainian version, the point of view of the Crimean Tatar population of Crimea.
  18. 1536
    1536 19 September 2015 16: 25 New
    +3
    But what about the food blockade of the Crimea declared by Tatar menjlis announced on tomorrow, September 20? The right hand does not know what the left does? Or who will pay more, for that and the mountain? In a word, there are more questions than answers. (In general, it sounds ridiculous: the “food (!) Blockade of the Crimea” is the Crimea, where the earth itself will give birth to everything that is pleasing to the soul. It’s rather the other way around - this Crimea may declare a blockade of Ukraine).
    But one thing is clear. Until the criminal court repeals the criminal decision of Khrushchev and his camarilla on the so-called "transfer" of the Crimean Peninsula to the "structure of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic", there will be no legal reason to say that Crimea never belonged to Ukraine. So this gentleman is right that he spoke in Geneva, speaking about this event that occurred in the 1950 years. How many crimes are on Khrushchev’s conscience? At least for this, for the Crimea, the villain should be punished, even posthumously. So that his children and grandchildren would not boast of their "last name". And they hid their eyes from honest people whom they betrayed, and possibly sold, their relative!
    1. ermolai
      ermolai 22 September 2015 04: 50 New
      0
      Quote: 1536
      the court will not reverse the criminal decision of Khrushchev and his camarilla on the so-called "transfer" of the Crimean Peninsula to the "composition of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic",

      Well, Kuchma’s il Kuchma, I don’t know how to move, I have already said that the Khrushchev forced upon the Crimea the independence, he forcibly pushed Crimea between her legs.
  19. atamankko
    atamankko 19 September 2015 18: 08 New
    +2
    It's nice to hear people not speaking from someone else's voice.
  20. cat hippopotamus
    cat hippopotamus 19 September 2015 18: 32 New
    +3
    So what ? Abduraimov gave all of them to the Geyropeans in the face, there is nothing to let the snot with bubbles about the occupation of Crimea. The Crimean Tatars as a people received their identity and rights as an independent people in their own language and schools were opened for them, under the so-called occupation of Crimea by Russia. And as far as I know, the city of Bakhchisarai has a status as the capital of the Crimean Tatar community. And not small rights were returned to them in local villages where Tatars lived in the past. So they returned all the mosques where they were preserved and now they use them for their intended purpose. I myself am from the Crimea, but now I live in Samara, but I have relatives in the Crimea and I constantly communicate with them on Skype. So I own the info first-hand.
  21. Bor
    Bor 19 September 2015 19: 08 New
    +1
    Khrushchev's complete stupidity with Crimea entailed a chain of fatal consequences. Here it is, the role of the personality in history - clearly! We have to correct other people's mistakes. Crimean Tatars will not be worse than under the Ukrainian government! Not because there is nowhere worse, but because they have become the litmus test for assessing Russian reforms on the peninsula.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 19 September 2015 19: 14 New
      -1
      Quote: Bor
      Khrushchev's complete stupidity with Crimea entailed a chain of fatal consequences

      Well, why was it so categorical then no one even thought that the USSR would ever cease to exist and Ukraine would suddenly become a separate state, if anyone was to blame then Gorbachev-Yeltsin and their entourage like Gaidar, Chubais, etc.
      1. japs
        japs 22 September 2015 12: 44 New
        +3
        I wonder who is minus you? Proponents of humpbacked Judah or drunk EBN?
        The losses of the peoples of the USSR from the spotted traitor can be compared with the losses suffered by the USSR during the Second World War. still blinks on geyropov. Strangle his geeks too!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  22. kotvov
    kotvov 19 September 2015 19: 27 New
    +2
    Now the West violates the rights of all residents of the Crimea by introducing restrictions on the peninsula ,,,
    so them muzzle on the table.
  23. revnagan
    revnagan 19 September 2015 20: 55 New
    +1
    The information war is understandable. The Crimean Tatars were "rotted" in Ukraine? Didn’t they recognize their rights? Well, well ... They did what they wanted. They seized the land in the Crimea, cut the Slavs to discos, and the authorities didn’t react to this . They made tricks with Turkey, trained extremists, and the authorities turned a blind eye to this in the hope that the Tatars could be used as policemen for the Russian population of Crimea. Now let’s see how they restore their “rights” in Crimea.
  24. Lecha57
    Lecha57 20 September 2015 05: 36 New
    0
    I still remember when the young assistant to the presidential candidate of Tatarstan (90s) said: "We will restore our influence from the Crimea to Vladivostok, in the footsteps of Genghis. I believe that there are Tatars who are sensible. We also have something to think about.
    1. ermolai
      ermolai 22 September 2015 05: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Lecha57
      its influence from the Crimea to Vladivostok, in the footsteps of Genghis.

      hmm, what does the ranger know about the CHIN from the KHANs? then she p ryhaty in IZ Torah I poured into my ears. and judging by the engravings that have survived to this day, for some reason he is of Slavic appearance. and then, as it were, in the footsteps of the Tatar traitors in Kolyma did not have to roam.
  25. Azovian
    Azovian 20 September 2015 07: 13 New
    +4
    Tatars in the Crimea are not very good. Land, by the way, is captured in the best resort places. Authorities could cut plots in non-rush areas for development. Well, at the expense of the blockade of Russia it is worth scratching the back of the head. And a year ago. Crimea feeds from Ukraine. And he does not feed himself. From Krasnodar come crumbs. A year has passed - no bridge, no light, no food. Only real estate once again sawed.
  26. sssla
    sssla 20 September 2015 07: 32 New
    0
    “Announcing sanctions against Russian policy, they actually bind ordinary people hand and foot, preventing them from moving freely and doing business,” he concluded.

    Well, that's what it is! Freaks
  27. asher
    asher 21 September 2015 19: 08 New
    +2
    Crimean Tatars are so actively fighting for their violated rights that they completely forget about their duties. However, they are not used to it. I don’t know if there are still opportunities, but if the entire Crimean Tatar people do not want to be responsible for the crimes of the majority of relatives, young and old during the years of the Second World War, then let's identify and issue specific “heroes”. Which, like all peoples with tribal roots, everyone in their families is well aware of and "remember their exploits." It is unfair when, since infancy, Russians have been considered Russian slaves and subhuman, in fact they always en masse in alliance with the worst enemies, and when they receive an answer, they start yelling about human rights and rehabilitation. I recently returned from the Crimea. He was in the heroic Sevastopol, which the ancestors of these unfortunate sufferers stormed and massacred, but also in non-heroic Yalta, where a vile tablet with a reminder of the unfortunate deported traitors hangs at the bus station. And okay, they would deport us to Siberia, since there was no fertile Ferghana and well-fed Tashkent, where they successfully bred, and as a result also showed a rotten essence and as a result shamefully fled until they were stoned with stones. Uzbeks do not tolerate Russian nasty things!