Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army

81
Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army


To the great regret of the tape news agencies, increasingly began to dazzle with messages about the military threat to the Russian Federation. The United States of America, the NATO bloc and some UN member states are increasingly declaring about the allegedly aggressive-minded Russia. Numerous refutations and a statement of the fact that these polemics are indiscriminate lead nowhere. The political elite in Washington continues to bend its line, which is entirely aimed at discrediting Moscow.

NATO bases are inexorably growing around the Russian Federation. Trying to conquer a new region in the post-Soviet space, the White House initiates the “color revolutions”, after which pro-Western leaders come to power, seeking to introduce NATO troops or the US military into the former Soviet republics.

As they say, there is no smoke without fire. Many, both Russian and foreign military experts, have long concluded that the main factors influencing the creation of a conflict situation in a particular region are and will remain natural resources, such as oil and gas. At the same time in the visible future to this exhaustible wealth of the planet will be added more and clean, fresh water (Lake Baikal approx, editorial).

As is known, States that position themselves as a world hegemon, strive to gain superiority and leading positions around the world. In fact, the only people who are practically openly opposing the actions of America are Russia. In turn, Washington, which by all means tries to drag the world community into its thread of thinking, doesn’t like it very much. When political statements become scarce, the United States begins to “play with its muscles”, declare some need to strengthen its forces in the Baltic States, expand the American missile defense system in Europe and the Far East, or provide assistance to supposedly oppressed peoples, inside some small state with point of view of geopolitics.

All these factors contribute to the fact that Russia is forced to constantly develop its military industry and conduct full-scale re-equipment of troops with new models of weapons and military equipment, capable, if necessary, to resist any possible aggression.

In addition, the century of new digital technologies itself requires the corresponding re-equipment of weapons and equipment of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. It is clear that to restrain the onslaught of the enemy is truly the best a tank T-34 of its time, these days is not entirely appropriate. That is why we are increasingly hearing about the replacement of some tanks by others, air defense systems are being improved, the Ground Forces are being re-equipped, the fleet is getting new ships and so on.

Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    20 September 2015 05: 52
    as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. now, I suppose, clichés like: "do not want to feed your army .." good should be with fists "and so on ... winked
    1. +70
      20 September 2015 06: 29
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      now, I suppose, clichés like: "do not want to feed your army .." good should be with fists "and so on ...

      And you can’t argue with you ...

      But Napoleon, ours, Boanapartia, can be challenged ...

      He "missed" in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver ...
      1. +31
        20 September 2015 09: 57
        Cossacks cheated in France. They hid, such bastards, empty bottles under the table, so that they pay less for wine. drinks Yes, the Chaldeans were also urged on: "quickly, quickly" laughing .
        1. +25
          20 September 2015 10: 41
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          Cossacks cheated in France. They hid, you bastards, empty bottles under the table to pay less for wine. Yes, the Chaldeans were also urged on: "quickly, quickly"


          And the garcons, and not in the house, why so rapidly, the supply of wine in the wine cellars is running out, and there is no "revenue" lol ...

          Well, nothing, but the Russian "fast, fast", gave the French and the world eateries and restaurants "Bistro" ...
          1. +12
            20 September 2015 11: 06
            And read where in Russian "SHVAL" and "Sharomyga" are derived from the French chevaliers - then trash - and I don't remember a word like sharomyga - something worthy in French

            But when they retreated, frozen and hungry, they really became "trash"
            1. +29
              20 September 2015 11: 52
              Quote: Talgat
              and I don’t remember a similar word for sharomig - something decent in French

              Sher ami (dear friend), when they ate, during a big drape they asked
              1. +21
                21 September 2015 05: 26
                Look at the American bases. In Germany alone, it is 287. 287 bases, Karl, in one country!


                (click picture to see in normal size).

                For contrast, the only base in Russia, in Syria, is marked in red.
                1. +13
                  21 September 2015 05: 36
                  Quote: crazyrom
                  Here, admire the American base.

                  They look like blackheads, they need to be removed.
                  1. +8
                    21 September 2015 15: 48
                    That's all clear to everyone. The article by Anatoly Wasserman is another confirmation of this that the supply of new and newest weapons to the Armed Forces and the Russian Navy is a task of paramount importance! But for some reason, the managers of the military-industrial complex and some of the leaders of the Defense Ministry lobbied by them do not want to understand this, with the full support of the country's leadership. What's this? And who are these people working for? Yes, their selfish interests are at the highest level. But as from the late 80s under Gorbachev, the Americans patronized the seizure of weapons they did not like, and their agents of influence, like honest pioneers, conscientiously dragged into scrap metal what still served and served. And now, these "Pioneers", or their worthy students and strive, all something new and advanced somewhere to shake off, if only in Russia there is no (Yankees in fact will be afraid). For example, it broke off with "Mistrals", and already suffering voices are longingly exaggerating the idea that Ka-52k helicopters should be sold to whoever buys them. At the same time, emphasizing that they are fulfilled, well, only for the indicated ships. Bullshit. If a night bomber was made from the U-2, then the turntables can be earned as you like, so that they perform all the tasks inherent in helicopters from any platform (deck, sand, stones, say Kunashir or Shikotan). Enough already to arm anybody, It's time to turn your face to your army! Do you really hope for impunity? Ay ... on Olympus, do you understand everything?
                    1. 0
                      22 September 2015 18: 01
                      Just starting it was necessary to rearm the army 10 years earlier, our liberals are ready to sell Russia for 30 pieces of silver. We have a strange power, for the collapse of the country's defense capabilities give the hero of Russia, and transplanted to another chair with
                      profitable.
                2. +1
                  21 September 2015 13: 02
                  Germany has smallpox with Britain and Italy))
                3. 0
                  21 September 2015 14: 01
                  Quote: crazyrom
                  Look at the American bases. In Germany alone, it is 287. 287 bases, Karl, in one country!


                  (click picture to see in normal size).

                  For contrast, the only base in Russia, in Syria, is marked in red.

                  I have something incomprehensible ...
                  As for Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Hong Kong ...
                  Who can clarify?
                  1. +3
                    21 September 2015 15: 05
                    Well, in Kyrgyzstan, Manas. True, they were going to close. In Tajikistan, something was under discussion. But in Hong Kong, I don’t know.
                  2. 0
                    21 September 2015 22: 14
                    Well, the map may not be today, maybe a year or two is outdated, it does not change the meaning. I wonder how they littered Germany, Afghanistan and Iraq. And for some reason, Portugal, nafig she surrendered to them.
                    1. 0
                      22 September 2015 08: 33
                      Quote: crazyrom
                      And for some reason, Portugal, nafig she surrendered to them.

                      Gibraltar nearby. Well, the nearest route "home" (for a tactical retreat is the best springboard) hi such a joke of humor
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. +1
              20 September 2015 12: 38
              Quote: Talgat
              And they read from where in Russian "Shval" and "Sharomyga"

              Sharing is the same as the unforgettable "Jo not mange pa sis zhur" - just for work hi
            5. +4
              20 September 2015 14: 25
              cher ami — dear friend — when they surrendered or beg for food.
            6. +1
              21 September 2015 21: 35
              GENERAL THAT: Napoleonic troops asked for alms: in French, please give me a sharot
            7. +5
              22 September 2015 05: 33
              From "sher ami", Vsm dear friend ..... In general
          2. +3
            20 September 2015 21: 14
            The French have not lost anything. The commander-in-chief of the Russian troops "covered" all these "pranks" of the occupiers by paying the French from his own pocket. Probably PI times more than it actually was. Since then, the French have not respected us.
            1. +4
              21 September 2015 01: 17
              Quote: iouris
              Since then, the French have not respected us.

              Dont be upset. In the world, it is generally not accepted to respect strangers.
            2. +2
              21 September 2015 03: 32
              Quote: iouris
              The French have not lost anything. The commander-in-chief of the Russian troops "covered" all these "pranks" of the occupiers by paying the French from his own pocket. Probably PI times more than it actually was. Since then, the French have not respected us.

              Just about - I wrote about it a little higher. This is where the "occupants" paid for food and swill ??? what Amazing absolutely ...
          3. +5
            21 September 2015 01: 30
            Quote: Tanais
            Well, nothing, but the Russian "fast, fast", gave the French and the world eateries and restaurants "Bistro" ...

            Well, let's go to fairy tales. The bistro was originally an establishment that sold low quality alcohol (bistrouille, i.e. swill). The owner of such an establishment, the manufacturer of this very drink, was called aller chez le bistrot. Later, the name came to mean "small modest inexpensive cafe" (prendre un verre au bistrot). And then everything was reduced to bistro.
        2. +9
          20 September 2015 15: 37
          The tradition came from here - do not keep an empty bottle on the table.
        3. 0
          21 September 2015 01: 32
          But then, there appeared, friends all over the world, a bistro!
        4. +7
          21 September 2015 03: 29
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          "fast, fast"

          "Bistro-bistro" - everyone knows about that. And I was stunned when I learned that for all this "Fast-Fast", including champagne, oysters and other foie gras, was fully paid from the Russian treasury. Have you seen somewhere that the troops of the invaders paid for what they ate and drank in the captured city ?? what
          1. +4
            21 September 2015 15: 10
            Not really, for the sake of justice. Firstly, the officers were given a triple salary for 1814. Say, General Miloradovich lost all this salary. And the officer debts when our army left for 1,5 million rubles were paid by Count Vorontsov. Maybe he compensated something from the treasury, but I did not read about it. In any case, the invaders usually do not behave this way.
      2. -15
        21 September 2015 00: 54
        Quote: Tanais
        He "missed" in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver ...

        But as? How is an armed tourist? Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? No? Read.
        1. +3
          21 September 2015 01: 03
          Quote: bergma
          Quote: Tanais
          He "missed" in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver ...

          But as? How is an armed tourist? Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? No? Read

          You shave famously.

          - Marshal Zhukov - not the whole army
          - The "enslaver" was forgotten .. and it is much more important ..

          Not good negative
          1. -13
            21 September 2015 01: 12
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Not good

            What? To write about Zhukov?
            1. +7
              21 September 2015 01: 57
              Quote: bergma
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Not good

              What? To write about Zhukov?

              Nah .. fool to include out of the blue - not good.

              - you about the Army - you are about Zhukov
              - to you about the "enslaver" - you are silent ..

              Ah ah ah... request
        2. +23
          21 September 2015 03: 46
          Quote: bergma
          Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? Not?

          "Woe to the vanquished" (Vae victis) - have you heard about this? For the fact that these "deceived by the Fuehrer" robbed, killed for four years, for millions of lives, for 1700 destroyed cities and 70000 villages - for all this, it was necessary to take out anything more or less valuable from Germany, and raze Germany to the ground and salt by a meter fall asleep. Drive the Teutons into the Stone Age, so that no one will ever hear about the "great German nation".

          But Zhukov ... Do you think you did not deserve it? If you read the current "historians" like Svanidze, who count the bedside tables and rags that Zhukov brought out of Germany, then probably not. And if you listen to my grandfather, a tanker, who fought in besieged Leningrad and died in 1979, he still didn't deserve that!

          But I know that the "historians" - the liberals, the Soros fosterlings - deserve a birch and a strong rope!
          1. -5
            21 September 2015 09: 49
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            For the fact that these "deceived by the Fuhrer" for four years robbed, killed, for millions of lives, for 1700 destroyed cities and 70000 villages

            Zhukov planned to sell all this, and to direct funds to restore cities and villages? And also retired to the families of the victims?
            Looting is not a reparation. No one objects to reparations. Only you do not mind looting. And the Criminal Code, for example, objects.
            1. +7
              21 September 2015 12: 23
              Bergman: Legal reparations are yes. What about Israel? To make reparations for more than 1 trillion dead US condoms on a lohokost and create a fake "state" on this?
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +1
            22 September 2015 10: 19
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            And Zhukov ... Do you think you didn't deserve it? If you read the current "historians" like Svanidze, who count the bedside tables and rags that Zhukov brought out of Germany, then probably not. And if you listen to my grandfather, a tanker, who fought in besieged Leningrad and died in 1979, he still didn't deserve that!

            I don’t know what Zhukov took out there, I didn’t see the message — they were deleted by the user, so I completely agree with you — Marshal VICTORY has every right to take out whatever he wants, but he wasn’t such a person. After the Second World War, the upper echelons (including Stalin) were afraid of his unquestioned authority, Stalin sent him away from Moscow, and all these trophy affairs and other stray people, in my opinion, were falsified, prepared and inflated by the right people to deprive Zhukov of his authority and remove him from power. Zhukov saved Rokossovsky and Konev, and these, on occasion, leaked him at the direction of Khrushchev.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +22
      20 September 2015 09: 15
      Sometimes common truths need to be driven in, for that they are truths.
      There is nothing new under the sun. It so happened that Soviet science moved ahead of the curve thanks to injections into the military sphere of industry and not at all from a good life. It was a compulsory measure for the sake of maintaining peace throughout the world. Opening up, stirring up the liberal routine imposed on us by the West "earn as you can and you will be happy", abandon its grin, will allow us to reach a technological and production breakthrough in the defense industry. We already went through this in the USSR. That's all right. If you want to be reckoned with - be strong first of all. There is no time for sentimentality. No matter how we are presented with the idea of ​​a liberal economy, but it is predatory in its essence. To live with wolves - howl like a wolf.
      1. +7
        20 September 2015 09: 29
        I would have “edited” this proverb a little differently, not howling like a wolf, but having a good “spear” and several “knives behind the bootleg”! Otherwise, howl, if only from 1941 to 1945. “our ancestors would“ howl like a wolf ”, then where would we be now ?! what the respected ONOTOLE meant and a big plus for his article +!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +5
          20 September 2015 11: 31
          There is no need to change the meanings by pulling out the verb "howl" with a different meaning. The main thing here is "to live with the wolves" and to adhere to the rules of the pack (howl at the same time, denoting its strength and presence). But the bottom line is that this obligation to "howl" with everyone can be violated by another, stronger candidate for leadership. This was the USSR. And God forbid that Russia would become it.
    4. +1
      20 September 2015 10: 04
      andrei yurievich (2) SU Today, 05:52 ".Onotole, voiced common truth. Now I think clichés like:" you do not want to feed your army .. "good should be with fists" and so on
      The very history of the Russian state is a vivid example of the need to have a strong army equipped with the most modern weapons .. ,,, political leadership. Capable of making non-standard and responsible decisions at the right time for the state ....
      1. +32
        20 September 2015 10: 12
        .and nothing to say ...
        1. +2
          20 September 2015 14: 39
          Why rearm? In my opinion, the USA and NATO clearly explain to us why with all their actions. Even unnecessary questions do not arise. Thanks to them, even though you don’t have to break your head over this laughing
          1. +1
            21 September 2015 14: 04
            Probably, if the Western media hadn’t phoned, they wouldn’t have known what kind of menacing we are ... We, unlike Europe, have an army, and in fact a good one, we have a fleet, aviation, and strategic missile forces ... Beauty in general. And what does Obama dislike about this?
    5. +1
      20 September 2015 20: 03
      "... and the whole world to dust, but then ..". Better to be afraid of us. Afraid means respect.
  2. +13
    20 September 2015 06: 10
    Well no. It is written that there is nothing to add.
    1. +3
      20 September 2015 08: 51
      The current is not very happy, cho in our arsenal is full of components from the camp of the probable enemy.
      1. +1
        21 September 2015 14: 06
        This is unfortunate ... But at the same time, we have these weapons, and there are people who know how to fight them. And this is not bad, especially when compared with the 90s
    2. 0
      20 September 2015 10: 28
      EvgNik SU Today, 06:10
      Well no. Written in such a way that there is nothing to add. "
      .. Anatoly did not take into account .. America’s new weapon ... laughing
      .. "As reported by The Washington Post,
      http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1481790.html
    3. +1
      20 September 2015 11: 57
      Quote: EvgNik
      Well no. It is written that there is nothing to add.

      Hackneyed Truths. Frankly, Wasserman in this article, well, just Captain Evidence.
      1. +1
        20 September 2015 18: 45
        Quote: Karabanov
        Hackneyed Truths.


        And here is what, for example, one famous British wrote:

        "When the Cambrian was conceived, the Eternal Peace was announced to us:
        Drop ground weapons, call strangers to a feast!
        And they sold us, unarmed, into slavery, to the enemy under the yell,
        And the Gods of the Alphabet Truths said: "Believe, but not all!"
  3. +12
    20 September 2015 06: 19
    ... Russia is compelled to constantly develop its military industry and to conduct full-scale re-equipment of troops with new weapons and military equipment, capable, if necessary, of resisting any possible aggression.
    This is not an easy measure, but a necessity. The military industry is, first and foremost, advanced technologies, and this is an impetus to the development of civilian production. And the development of peaceful industry. in turn, it would not be possible without a strong defense power of the country. The circle is closed ...
    1. -17
      20 September 2015 13: 57
      the military industry in Russia is a grave digger of civilian production.
      There are many reasons for this from the principles of profit generation in fulfilling state defense orders, and the banal lack of normal, barrier-free access to state defense orders for non-state companies ...
      The circle really closed, the elephant inserted the trunk in his ass ..
      1. +1
        20 September 2015 18: 45
        Quote: tulaev
        and the banal lack of normal, barrier-free access to state defense orders for non-state companies ...

        Yes, itch! One non-state projection was piled here. They began to understand, in relation to the terrain, the support in the well, SIP35kv / mm, KL 95kv / mm in the machine for 80A, and all this to a private house.
        Madhouse, but with a license what
      2. msm
        msm
        0
        21 September 2015 10: 45
        commonplace lack of normal, barrier-free access to public defense
        I must honestly admit that there is no access for capitalists to budget money!
      3. 0
        21 September 2015 14: 11
        I completely agree, the Russian military-industrial complex is a grave digger, and he digs a hole for NATO, digs, and the bloc itself helps him. There are hopes that he will dig under the west
    2. 0
      21 September 2015 00: 57
      Quote: nozdrevat58
      The military industry is, first and foremost, advanced technologies, and this is an impetus to the development of civilian production.

      Depends on the country. Not everywhere like that.
  4. +14
    20 September 2015 06: 23
    by its mere existence to discourage even the thoughts of a probable adversary from engaging in a real battle!
    I fully support! Not even to dream of them !!
    1. 0
      20 September 2015 09: 51
      Quote: Vitek
      by its mere existence to discourage even the thoughts of a probable adversary from engaging in a real battle!
      I fully support! Not even to dream of them !!

      C'mon, let it be a dream. Nightmares sober up well ...
  5. -4
    20 September 2015 06: 30
    an article with simplicity unusual for Wasserman, a sensation for a school wall newspaper ..
    1. +5
      20 September 2015 09: 33
      So it ONNOTOLE writes this for the "especially gifted" who received their education by smoking an ABC book in corn with their grandfather for two!
      1. 0
        20 September 2015 19: 28
        Quote: kartalovkolya

        afdjhbn67
        an article with simplicity unusual for Wasserman, a sensation for a school wall newspaper ..


        Quote: kartalovkolya
        So it ONNOTOLE writes this for the "especially gifted" who received their education by smoking an ABC book in corn with their grandfather for two!

        Well, let him send him to Dom2.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      20 September 2015 12: 04
      So, ingenious - everything is simple. The same is true, and so what? Repetition is the mother of learning. Prayers and those every day do not correspond.
  6. +7
    20 September 2015 07: 01
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!

    Worthy words and correct ones, as well as the fact that the equipment itself and weapons without a man, his skill is a piece of iron. And it is commendable that recently our Army and Navy are not only in the process of rearmament, but also in constant study and training.

    It remains to these words of Anatoly Alexandrovich add the words of Alexander Vasilyevich:
    No battle can be won in the office.
    soldier
    1. +1
      21 September 2015 14: 15
      Somewhere I heard this: "If we sell the army, what if there is a war? We will throw the enemy with bundles of dollar bills?" So let at least part of the money go to really protect the people, and not to the pockets of the sycophants of the West
  7. +8
    20 September 2015 07: 13
    Russia must have an army armed with the most modern weapons. And to this we must make every effort. And these weapons must be owned and controlled by experts of the highest class!
    1. +1
      20 September 2015 18: 42
      Those who are not able to fend for themselves are not considered or even talked to. I take everything that I like and keep quiet, endured! Do we need it?
      It's better to be strong, at least so, just in case, especially in the company of such "gopniks" as the US and the EU.
      1. -6
        21 September 2015 01: 00
        Quote: Castor
        Who is not able to fend for themselves, no one counts or even talks. I take away everything that I like and keep quiet, endured!

        Do you mean the USSR?
        1. 0
          21 September 2015 07: 08
          Quote: bergma
          Do you mean the USSR?

          What period of the USSR?
          1. -4
            21 September 2015 08: 44
            Quote: Castor
            What period of the USSR?

            Any. Which one do you like.
            1. 0
              21 September 2015 10: 44
              Quote: bergma
              Any.


              What are you caught?
              1. -1
                21 September 2015 10: 54
                Quote: Castor
                What are you caught?

                Who cares?
                1. 0
                  21 September 2015 11: 21
                  Quote: bergma
                  Who cares?


                  For the USSR, no.
                  1. -1
                    21 September 2015 11: 26
                    Quote: Castor
                    For the USSR, no

                    Glad you agree with me.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        21 September 2015 14: 19
        I support, only a strong country can somehow change the alignment on the world arena, only in this way they will not be able to threaten us with a "nuclear club", only in a strong country can one count on tomorrow
  8. +10
    20 September 2015 08: 03
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!

    I observed the situation when 2 paratrooper officers drank vodka, and a group of 10 very warlike young people was doing the same. One officer stood up and said: “Well, what. Makhach?” - the belligerence somehow abruptly faded and disappeared in an unknown direction.
    Russia Mother she is kind, always escorts to the house. Someone to Berlin, someone to Paris. Someone wants to be up to Washington?
    1. +2
      20 September 2015 12: 17
      Quote: Tusv
      Russia Mother she is kind, always escorts to the house.

      I read it and recalled the joke from Vladimirich, from Nikulin Yuri, the kingdom of heaven to him.
      Two ICBMs meet, American and ours, in space, essno
      -ABOUT! By a hundred?
      -Hi! Pour it in!
      -How are you, all capitalism? well, between the first and second bullet did not fly drinks
      -And do you connect all the proletarians? Why don’t we bite?
      -We, Russians, and after the third we don’t bite, we will drinks
      - Oh, it’s getting worse for me, I’m probably going home belay
      - Don’t be afraid, I will see you straight to home Yes
      1. 0
        20 September 2015 12: 32
        Quote: perepilka
        - Don’t be afraid, I will see you straight to home

        This American pervert is constantly making her skirt short. My eggs and holster will be visible soon.
        Here it is. Where the American concern comes from. Wherever you look, it’s all the same ... (Next, an ode to the feminine)
    2. -6
      21 September 2015 01: 02
      Quote: Tusv
      I watched a situation when 2 paratrooper officers drank vodka,

      What, just like that, sitting in uniform and drinking vodka? Or did they have badges on silicone breasts? You are our dreamer.
  9. 0
    20 September 2015 08: 06
    Without the Russian army, no where!
  10. -1
    20 September 2015 08: 35
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!
    I do not argue. But why did we destroy the Soviet Union, if everything is like then?
    1. +8
      20 September 2015 08: 48
      Quote: Gardamir
      I do not argue. But why did we destroy the Soviet Union, if everything is like then?

      The answer to your question becomes clear now when you look at the betrayal by the former republics of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries! But was it necessary to feed all this su..ch..yu pack!?
      1. +6
        20 September 2015 11: 46
        Gardamir! The answer is this. And as they saw the elegant Paradise Gobachev, everyone in the European Union wanted them to become such. For some reason they did not. Not without saying that such a Glory Zaitsev did it. But this pack rushed to the European Union, thinking that they too would become so. Not steel!
    2. +1
      21 September 2015 14: 25
      There is such a thing, they call democracy. Everyone wanted freedom, but no one said that it was the freedom to quietly die of hunger, fall on busy streets and not find help. The freedom to be weak and defenseless ... And when they found out it was too late request
  11. -13
    20 September 2015 09: 03
    Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
    Expresses common truths with a smart look.
    1. +5
      20 September 2015 10: 06
      Quote: Bison
      Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
      Expresses common truths with a smart look.

      A man’s soul hurts for Odessa and what shit governs his city
      1. -1
        20 September 2015 20: 46
        It's not about Odessa. And for the fact that he repeats, like a parrot, what everyone has long known.
        You do not know why rearm the army?
    2. 0
      20 September 2015 20: 59
      [quote = Bison] Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
      He speaks common truths with an intelligent air .--- so eu they ask him, he answers !!! wink In general, smart JEWS !!! Some rulers of Judea today, to him, but listen to !!!! but it’s not destiny to see, everything HAPPENED !!!! feel wink
  12. +6
    20 September 2015 09: 07
    "A state like Russia is simply obliged to have a worthy army, equipped with the latest technology, capable of discouraging even the thoughts of a potential enemy from engaging in a real battle only by its existence!" ...


    Anatoly drove a nail ... Well, what else can I add ??? !!!

    Program for action ...
    1. 0
      20 September 2015 20: 50
      And what, without him, there are no smart people in the army and in the military-industrial complex?
      And from the fact that every hour to repeat the word "sugar" 300 times, your mouth will not become sweeter.
  13. +9
    20 September 2015 09: 08
    Probably the smartest, but still a little naive Anatoly Aleksandrovich wants to reach out to the brains of the liberal wing of our ruling elite with such obvious simplicity of the article, to whom the money spent on defense seems unnecessary and unnecessary (after all, they are just friends, but even outside the ocean!).
    PS Yes, so Wasserman is now also a burnt separatist (according to the Ukrainian authorities)! A new title in a series of his titles.
    1. +5
      20 September 2015 09: 33
      I agree. But still, some need to explain why they put on a bulletproof vest and take weapons for the time they meet with an inadequate, to the teeth, armed, opponent.
      1. +6
        20 September 2015 11: 58
        Instead of the TRP complex, it is necessary to introduce the passing of the norms of the Airborne Forces of the Airborne Forces in all ministries. Then you will feel what a soldier’s life is. And do not roll a barrel on Wasserman for simple truths. This is an axiom. And you need to know the axiom.
  14. +5
    20 September 2015 09: 38
    No words
    1. +8
      20 September 2015 11: 37
      And they were here too ..

      and here...
      Work was carried out on the rocket, and its new modification CZ-2C F-01 on November 26, 1975, successfully launched into orbit the first satellite in China, which then ...


      And here we are always the first ... Especially delivers an inflatable rubber gateway through which Leonov as if transferred from a spaceship to outer space.

      1. +10
        20 September 2015 12: 39
        And here, too, Kabul, and what has become ...

        For shuravi drinks
      2. 0
        20 September 2015 21: 47
        But he was partially inflatable. An excellent, moreover, decision that saved, by the way, Leonov’s life, the floor of his own words.
  15. +7
    20 September 2015 10: 20
    A state like Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army

    A. Wasserman - a purely civilian person, far from the army and he understands the need to have a strong army. And take some of the former and current members of the government that we hear from them. It is necessary to reduce the military budget. And this is said by people who, owing to their official duties, are obliged to take care of the defense capabilities of the state.
  16. 0
    20 September 2015 10: 22
    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. now, I suppose, clichés like: "do not want to feed your army .." good should be with fists "and so on ... winked

    I agree. We learned nothing new in the article. Mr. Wasserman, of course, considers himself an erudite and intelligent person, so let him give out something original. And they learn to repeat at school from the 1st grade.
    1. +1
      20 September 2015 11: 04
      Quote: Tatarname
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. now, I suppose, clichés like: "do not want to feed your army .." good should be with fists "and so on ... winked

      I agree. We learned nothing new in the article. Mr. Wasserman, of course, considers himself an erudite and intelligent person, so let him give out something original. And they learn to repeat at school from the 1st grade.

      Let Israel write something in such a cliche or vice versa ... So I would read! Weak Wassermann? Enough in the soul of the Russian poking around! bully
    2. 0
      21 September 2015 14: 29
      Well, what can you do, sometimes people need to repeat ten times to get it, and then ten more so that at least they start to do something ... Russian man, he harnesses for a long time, but travels quickly
  17. +4
    20 September 2015 10: 28
    This article is for smart and not very ... for everyone.
  18. +1
    20 September 2015 10: 55
    Wasserman often writes here and not bad .... But I don’t believe the men! He repainted once! And again, after all, he can .... He sings too sweetly (it feels like he's picking his heart and looking for .. slack) ... Well, I don’t know, genes are just whispering, DO NOT BELIEVE! hi
    1. +1
      20 September 2015 12: 09
      Meehan! But does a person have no right to make a mistake?
  19. +5
    20 September 2015 11: 34
    We have been tankers since childhood. Life is forcing.
    1. -3
      21 September 2015 01: 11
      Poor kids. With such and such parents.
  20. +3
    20 September 2015 13: 10
    Pushkin gave an accurate description of the French in several of his works, starting with the famous: "Musier Labe is a wretched Frenchman ..." Onegin.


    Alexander Pushkin
    “Mr. Beranger's Reputation”


    Do you remember, ah, your nobleness,
    Monsieur Frenchman, shitty captain,
    As we remember in common people
    Victory over the unchrist of the Russians?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how beyond the mountains of Suvorov
    Having stepped over, attacked you by surprise?
    How our old man ruffled you, flayer,
    And crushed you on the nail, like a flea?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how I drove all of Europe
    Are we alone with your Bonaparte Buyan?
    French then we saw many assholes,
    Yes, and your shitty captain!
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how your king burns
    Suddenly stupefied, like a tambourine goal and bald,
    Like on fire of a Moscow fire
    Did you fry our rats in Moscow?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not different from others, so. to tell;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember the fake songwriter
    You, our frost among native snow
    And the batteries are a perky heater,
    Soldier bayonet and noose Cossacks?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how we were in Paris
    Where is our cossack il regimental our pop
    He fooled you, sat down closer to the wine,
    And praised your wives yes b?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say your mother is fucking young
  21. 0
    20 September 2015 16: 22
    I’m afraid to prophesy, but Chevalier and Schermi seem to be on the way (they are trash and charomyigs) ☺
  22. +3
    20 September 2015 17: 43
    "Anatoly Wasserman. Why does Russia need to rearm the army"
    Anatoly Wasserman, why doesn't Russia jail Serdyukov and Vasilyeva? It might be better to write such an article "How can you rearm the army if the thieves are not imprisoned, EVERYTHING EQUALLY WILL BE BROKEN."
    1. 0
      20 September 2015 19: 44
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      "Anatoly Wasserman. Why does Russia need to rearm the army?" Anatoly Wasserman, why does Russia not put Serdyukov and Vasilyeva in prison? It might be better to write an article like this "How can you re-equip an army if thieves are not imprisoned, EVERYTHING LIKE EVERYTHING IS DROPPED."

      You can't do it yourself, you need to take the "GUARANTEE" as co-authors.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. +2
    20 September 2015 19: 59
    Certainly, a strong army is needed for Russia, but one should not forget about reliable rear services. Without a strong rear of the army there will be tryndets. Yes, and to fight for the resources actually belonging to the oligarchs that there is not much desire.
    1. +4
      20 September 2015 21: 41
      In vain minus - in the oligarchic liberal system all our problems.
  24. +1
    20 September 2015 21: 40
    Of course, it’s a pity that ordinary people are unfinished or unfinished, but they will have to arm themselves. The world is becoming very scary. And UB.lyudk. In the Naglosaks (to the people does not apply) will stop only power, and smart power.
  25. 0
    21 September 2015 11: 34
    The army is being rearmed, but this is just a small infusion to at least "match" it. The thieves' gathering is simply afraid that he will be robbed from abroad.
    We need much more radical steps that were taken in the USSR
    New means are needed, based on new principles of action. Most of today's developments are projects with a 30-50 year old beard. Both Armata and T50 are just the completion of very old projects. But to take radical steps forward, you need to change the economy. Stop playing "services" when an unfair markup is due to monopolies, kickbacks, etc. makes any undertaking meaningless.
    1. +2
      22 September 2015 05: 40
      Repost to the topic. Could not pass by .....

      How so!

      In Britain, they are sorting out how Indian pilots in the Russian SU-30 could beat the British with a score of 12: 0. The situation is especially piquant given the fact that SU is almost three times cheaper than Typhoons. In preparation for the war with Russia “to confront the Russian threat”, the British command recently organized special exercises for their pilots involving Indian aircraft.

      The trick was that the Indian pilots "fought" against the British "Typhoons" on the Russian-made SU-30. That is, the idea was that the British pilots learned to fight specifically against Russian aircraft. The Hindus defeated the British, having won a duel with a total score of 12: 0! In Britain, they are sorting out how this could be. Especially considering the fact that SU is almost three times cheaper than Typhoons.

      PS: So this is in addition an export version of the SU-30 with reduced characteristics. And at the helm of Buddhist contemplators. In short, they may not even come close to the SU-35. It seems that the war is being postponed.
  26. +4
    21 September 2015 12: 35
    Wasserman is right. Although this is an axiom, it must be constantly repeated to the uncles in the government, so that there are no thoughts about different "mistrals".
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. 0
    21 September 2015 18: 18
    Everything is correct. Learning mat. part, the Combat Regulations and the DOSAAF brochure "Combating enemy ground and air targets" 1988, Moscow. In parallel, we are studying the experience of the relevant bodies in countering internal threats to the State.
  29. 0
    21 September 2015 22: 25
    Quote: Evgeniy667b
    Au ... on Olympus, do you understand everything?

    Yes, they understand everything, but their pocket is closer.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"