Military Review

Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army

81
Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army



Much to our regret, the tapes of news agencies have increasingly begun to be filled with reports of a military threat to the Russian Federation. The United States of America, the NATO bloc and some UN member states are increasingly claiming that Russia is aggressively inclined to be. Numerous refutations and the statement of the fact that these data controversies are indifferent lead to nothing. The political elite of Washington continues to bend its line, entirely aimed at discrediting Moscow.

NATO bases are inexorably growing around the Russian Federation. Trying to conquer a new region in the post-Soviet space, the White House initiates the “color revolutions”, after which pro-Western leaders come to power, seeking to introduce NATO troops or the US military into the former Soviet republics.

As they say, there is no smoke without fire. Many, both Russian and foreign military experts, have long concluded that the main factors influencing the creation of a conflict situation in a particular region are and will remain natural resources, such as oil and gas. At the same time in the visible future to this exhaustible wealth of the planet will be added more and clean, fresh water (Lake Baikal approx, editorial).

As is known, States that position themselves as a world hegemon, strive to gain superiority and leading positions around the world. In fact, the only people who are practically openly opposing the actions of America are Russia. In turn, Washington, which by all means tries to drag the world community into its thread of thinking, doesn’t like it very much. When political statements become scarce, the United States begins to “play with its muscles”, declare some need to strengthen its forces in the Baltic States, expand the American missile defense system in Europe and the Far East, or provide assistance to supposedly oppressed peoples, inside some small state with point of view of geopolitics.

All these factors contribute to the fact that Russia is forced to constantly develop its military industry and conduct full-scale re-equipment of troops with new models of weapons and military equipment, capable, if necessary, to resist any possible aggression.

In addition, the century of new digital technologies itself requires the corresponding re-equipment of weapons and equipment of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. It is clear that to restrain the onslaught of the enemy is truly the best a tank T-34 of its time, these days is not entirely appropriate. That is why we are increasingly hearing about the replacement of some tanks by others, air defense systems are being improved, the Ground Forces are being re-equipped, the fleet is getting new ships and so on.

Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!
Author:
Originator:
https://vk.com/wall-81114325_27240
81 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 20 September 2015 05: 52 New
    +22
    as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. Now I suppose clichés like “do not want to feed your army ..” should be good with fists, and so on ... winked
    1. Tanais
      Tanais 20 September 2015 06: 29 New
      +70
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      Now I suppose clichés like “do not want to feed your army ..” should be good with fists, and so on ...

      And you can’t argue with you ...

      But Napoleon, ours, Boanapartia, can be challenged ...

      He “missed,” in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver ...
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 20 September 2015 09: 57 New
        +31
        Cossacks cheated in France. They hid, such bastards, empty bottles under the table, so that they pay less for wine. drinks Yes, they also urged the Chaldeans: "quickly, quickly" laughing .
        1. Tanais
          Tanais 20 September 2015 10: 41 New
          +25
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          Cossacks cheated in France. They hid, such bastards, empty bottles under the table, so that they pay less for wine. Yes, they also urged the Chaldeans: "quickly, quickly"


          And to the Garcons, and not to the house, why so quickly, the stocks of wine in the wine cellars are waning, but there are no “proceeds” lol .

          Well, nothing, but the Russian "fast, fast" gave the French and the world eateries and restaurants "Bistro" ...
          1. Talgat
            Talgat 20 September 2015 11: 06 New
            +12
            And they read from where in Russian the “SCWAL" and "Sharomyga" are derivatives from the French Chevalier - then the trash - and I don’t remember the similar word to the Sharomyga - something worthy in French

            But when they retreated frozen and hungry - they really became a "trash"
            1. family tree
              family tree 20 September 2015 11: 52 New
              +29
              Quote: Talgat
              and I don’t remember a similar word for sharomig - something decent in French

              Sher ami (dear friend), when they ate, during a big drape they asked
              1. crazyrom
                crazyrom 21 September 2015 05: 26 New
                +21
                Look at the American bases. In Germany alone, it is 287. 287 bases, Karl, in one country!


                (click picture to see in normal size).

                For contrast, the only base in Russia, in Syria, is marked in red.
                1. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 21 September 2015 05: 36 New
                  +13
                  Quote: crazyrom
                  Here, admire the American base.

                  They look like blackheads, they need to be removed.
                  1. Evgeniy667b
                    Evgeniy667b 21 September 2015 15: 48 New
                    +8
                    Everything is clear to everyone. Anatoly Wasserman's article is another confirmation of this, that the supply of new and latest weapons to the Russian Navy and Navy is a task of paramount importance! Only for some reason, managers of the military-industrial complex and some of them lobbied leaders of the Defense Ministry do not want to understand this, with full support from the country's leadership. What's this? And who do these people work for? Yes, selfish interests they have at the highest level. But as with the late 80s under Gorbachev, the Americans patronized the seizure of types of weapons that they did not like, and their agents of influence, like honest pioneers, conscientiously dragged into the scrap metal what else to serve and serve. And now, these "Pioneers", or their worthy students and strive, to dig up everything something new and advanced somewhere, if only there would be no more in Russia (the Yankees will be afraid). For example, it broke off with the Mistrals, and already distressing voices eagerly exaggerate the idea that Ka-52k helicopters should be sold to the one who buys them. At the same time, emphasizing that they are completed, well, only for the indicated ships. Bullshit. If you made a night bomber out of U-2, then you can work the turntables as you like so that they perform all the tasks inherent in helicopters from any platform (deck, sand, stones, say Kunashir or Shikotan). Enough to arm anyhow anyone, It's time to turn to face your army! Do you really hope for impunity? Au ... on Olympus, do you understand everything?
                    1. go21zd45few
                      go21zd45few 22 September 2015 18: 01 New
                      0
                      Just starting it was necessary to rearm the army 10 years earlier, our liberals are ready to sell Russia for 30 pieces of silver. We have a strange power, for the collapse of the country's defense capabilities give the hero of Russia, and transplanted to another chair with
                      profitable.
                2. inpu
                  inpu 21 September 2015 13: 02 New
                  +1
                  Germany has smallpox with Britain and Italy))
                3. podpolkovnik
                  podpolkovnik 21 September 2015 14: 01 New
                  0
                  Quote: crazyrom
                  Look at the American bases. In Germany alone, it is 287. 287 bases, Karl, in one country!


                  (click picture to see in normal size).

                  For contrast, the only base in Russia, in Syria, is marked in red.

                  I have something incomprehensible ...
                  As for Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Hong Kong ...
                  Who can clarify?
                  1. anderles66
                    anderles66 21 September 2015 15: 05 New
                    +3
                    Well, in Kyrgyzstan, Manas. True, they were going to close. In Tajikistan, something was under discussion. But in Hong Kong, I don’t know.
                  2. crazyrom
                    crazyrom 21 September 2015 22: 14 New
                    0
                    Well, the map may not be today, maybe a year or two is outdated, it does not change the meaning. I wonder how they littered Germany, Afghanistan and Iraq. And for some reason, Portugal, nafig she surrendered to them.
                    1. fennekRUS
                      fennekRUS 22 September 2015 08: 33 New
                      0
                      Quote: crazyrom
                      And for some reason, Portugal, nafig she surrendered to them.

                      Gibraltar side by side. Well, the nearest route "home" (for a tactical retreat, the best bridgehead) hi such a joke of humor
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. Tusv
              Tusv 20 September 2015 12: 38 New
              +1
              Quote: Talgat
              And read from where in the Russian language "Dump" and "Sharomyga"

              Sharomyzhnichat is the same as the unforgettable "Jo no mange na sis zhur" - only for work hi
            5. andrewkor
              andrewkor 20 September 2015 14: 25 New
              +4
              cher ami — dear friend — when they surrendered or beg for food.
            6. Derex
              Derex 21 September 2015 21: 35 New
              +1
              GENERAL THAT: Napoleonic troops asked for alms: in French, please give me a sharot
            7. Kunar
              Kunar 22 September 2015 05: 33 New
              +5
              From "sher ami", Vsm dear friend ..... But in general
          2. iouris
            iouris 20 September 2015 21: 14 New
            +3
            The French did not lose anything. The commander in chief of the Russian troops "covered" all these "pranks" of the invaders, paying the Frenchmen out of pocket. Probably in PI times more than it actually was. Since then, the French have not respected us.
            1. bergma
              bergma 21 September 2015 01: 17 New
              +4
              Quote: iouris
              Since then, the French have not respected us.

              Dont be upset. In the world, it is generally not accepted to respect strangers.
            2. Zoldat_A
              Zoldat_A 21 September 2015 03: 32 New
              +2
              Quote: iouris
              The French did not lose anything. The commander in chief of the Russian troops "covered" all these "pranks" of the invaders, paying the Frenchmen out of pocket. Probably in PI times more than it actually was. Since then, the French have not respected us.

              That's it - I wrote a little higher about it. This is where the "invaders" paid for food and swipes ??? what Amazing absolutely ...
          3. bergma
            bergma 21 September 2015 01: 30 New
            +5
            Quote: Tanais
            Well, nothing, but the Russian "fast, fast" gave the French and the world eateries and restaurants "Bistro" ...

            Well, send tales. Bistro initially, this is an institution where they traded low-quality alcohol (bistrouille, i.e. swill). The owner of such an institution, the manufacturer of this swill, was called aller chez le bistrot. Later, the name began to mean "a small modest inexpensive cafe" (prendre un verre au bistrot). And then it all reduced to bistro.
        2. Socialism 2.0
          Socialism 2.0 20 September 2015 15: 37 New
          +9
          The tradition came from here - do not keep an empty bottle on the table.
        3. cuzmin.mihail2013
          cuzmin.mihail2013 21 September 2015 01: 32 New
          0
          But then, there appeared, friends all over the world, a bistro!
        4. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 21 September 2015 03: 29 New
          +7
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          fast fast

          "Bistro-bistro" - everyone knows about that. And I was stunned when I found out that all this "Quickly-quickly", including champagne, oysters and other foie gras, was paid in full from the Russian treasury. Have you seen somewhere that the troops of the invaders paid for what they ate and drank in the captured city ?? what
          1. anderles66
            anderles66 21 September 2015 15: 10 New
            +4
            Not really, for the sake of justice. Firstly, the officers were given a triple salary for 1814. Say, General Miloradovich lost all this salary. And the officer debts when our army left for 1,5 million rubles were paid by Count Vorontsov. Maybe he compensated something from the treasury, but I did not read about it. In any case, the invaders usually do not behave this way.
      2. bergma
        bergma 21 September 2015 00: 54 New
        -15
        Quote: Tanais
        He “missed,” in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver ...

        But as? How is an armed tourist? Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? No? Read.
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 21 September 2015 01: 03 New
          +3
          Quote: bergma
          Quote: Tanais
          "Missed" he, in his phrase the moment that the Russian army does not come as a robber and enslaver .

          But as? How is an armed tourist? Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? No? Read

          You shave famously.

          - Marshal Zhukov - not the whole army
          - they have forgotten the "enslaver" .. but it is much more important ..

          Not good negative
          1. bergma
            bergma 21 September 2015 01: 12 New
            -13
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Not good

            What? To write about Zhukov?
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 21 September 2015 01: 57 New
              +7
              Quote: bergma
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Not good

              What? To write about Zhukov?

              Nah .. fool to include out of the blue - not good.

              - you about the Army - you are about Zhukov
              - to you about the "enslaver" - you are silent.

              Ah ah ah... request
        2. Zoldat_A
          Zoldat_A 21 September 2015 03: 46 New
          +23
          Quote: bergma
          Have you read the post-war inventory of the property of Marshal Zhukov? Not?

          "Woe to the vanquished" (Vae victis) - did not hear about this? Because these "deceived by the Führer" robbed, killed, for millions of lives, for 1700 of destroyed cities and 70000 villages for four years - for all this, everything had to be taken out of the slightest value, and Germany was leveled with land and salt per meter fall asleep. Drive the Teutons into the Stone Age so that no one will ever hear about the "great German nation."

          But Zhukov ... Do you think you did not deserve it? If you read the current "historians" like Svanidze, counting the bedside tables and rags that Zhukov removed from Germany, then probably not. And if you listen to my grandfather, a tanker who fought in the besieged Leningrad and died in 1979, he still didn’t deserve it!

          But I know what the "historians" -liberasts deserved, the Soros fodders - the birch and the strong rope!
          1. bergma
            bergma 21 September 2015 09: 49 New
            -5
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            For the fact that these "deceived by the Führer" robbed and killed for four years, for millions of lives, for 1700 destroyed cities and 70000 villages

            Zhukov planned to sell all this, and to direct funds to restore cities and villages? And also retired to the families of the victims?
            Looting is not a reparation. No one objects to reparations. Only you do not mind looting. And the Criminal Code, for example, objects.
            1. japs
              japs 21 September 2015 12: 23 New
              +7
              Bergman: Legal reparations - yes. What about Israel? Make reparations for more than 1 trillion dead US condoms on the Lochocaust and create a fake "state" on this?
            2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. Corsair
            Corsair 22 September 2015 10: 19 New
            +1
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            But Zhukov ... Do you think you did not deserve it? If you read the current "historians" like Svanidze, counting bedside tables and rags that Zhukov removed from Germany, then probably not. And if you listen to my tankman’s grandfather, who fought in the besieged Leningrad and died in 1979, he still didn’t deserve it!

            I don’t know what Zhukov took out there, I didn’t see the message — they were deleted by the user, so I completely agree with you — Marshal VICTORY has every right to take out whatever he wants, but he wasn’t such a person. After the Second World War, the upper echelons (including Stalin) were afraid of his unquestioned authority, Stalin sent him away from Moscow, and all these trophy affairs and other stray people, in my opinion, were falsified, prepared and inflated by the right people to deprive Zhukov of his authority and remove him from power. Zhukov saved Rokossovsky and Konev, and these, on occasion, leaked him at the direction of Khrushchev.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 20 September 2015 09: 15 New
      +22
      Sometimes common truths need to be driven in, for that they are truths.
      There is nothing new under the sun. It just so happened that Soviet science was advancing due to injections into the military sphere of industry and not at all from a good life. It was a necessary measure for the sake of preserving world peace. To open up, stir up the liberal routine imposed on us by the West “earn as you can and you will be happy”, refuse to grin it, will allow us to enter a technological and production breakthrough precisely in the defense industry. We have already passed this in the USSR. That's right. If you want to be reckoned with you, be strong first of all. There is no longer sentiment. No matter how we are presented with the idea of ​​a liberal economy, but it is predatory in its own way. To live with wolves - howl like a wolf.
      1. kartalovkolya
        kartalovkolya 20 September 2015 09: 29 New
        +7
        I’d have a little differently “edited” this saying, not howl like a wolf, but have a good “hump” and a few “knives behind the shafts!” But howl, if only from 1941 to 1945 "our ancestors would howl like a wolf," where would we be now?! In response to their wolf howl, Russia answered and will respond with a powerful "bear roar" (about the consequences of which you can learn from the descendants of the "dring nah osten")! Here what I mean dear ONOTOLE and a big plus for his article +!
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. siberalt
          siberalt 20 September 2015 11: 31 New
          +5
          No need to overshadow the meanings, pulling out the verb "howl" with a different meaning. The main thing here is to "live with wolves" and stick to the rules of the pack (howl at the same time, indicating your strength and presence). But the bottom line is that this obligation to "howl" with everyone may be violated by another, stronger candidate for leader. That was the USSR. And God forbid that Russia would become one.
    4. 222222
      222222 20 September 2015 10: 04 New
      +1
      Andrei Yuryevich (2) SU Today, 05:52 ". Onotole, voiced common truths. Now I believe clichés like" do not want to feed your army .. will be showered .. "the good must be with fists" and so on
      The very history of the Russian state is a vivid example of the need to have a strong army equipped with the most modern weapons .. ,,, political leadership. Capable of making non-standard and responsible decisions at the right time for the state ....
      1. 222222
        222222 20 September 2015 10: 12 New
        +32
        .and nothing to say ...
        1. marlin1203
          marlin1203 20 September 2015 14: 39 New
          +2
          Why rearm? In my opinion, the USA and NATO clearly explain to us why with all their actions. Even unnecessary questions do not arise. Thanks to them, even though you don’t have to break your head over this laughing
          1. Raindragon
            Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 04 New
            +1
            Probably, if the Western media hadn’t phoned, they wouldn’t have known what kind of menacing we are ... We, unlike Europe, have an army, and in fact a good one, we have a fleet, aviation, and strategic missile forces ... Beauty in general. And what does Obama dislike about this?
    5. Kent0001
      Kent0001 20 September 2015 20: 03 New
      +1
      "... and the whole world is in ruin, but then .." Better to be afraid of us. Afraid means respected.
  2. EvgNik
    EvgNik 20 September 2015 06: 10 New
    +13
    Well no. It is written that there is nothing to add.
    1. Basarev
      Basarev 20 September 2015 08: 51 New
      +3
      The current is not very happy, cho in our arsenal is full of components from the camp of the probable enemy.
      1. Raindragon
        Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 06 New
        +1
        This is unfortunate ... But at the same time, we have these weapons, and there are people who know how to fight them. And this is not bad, especially when compared with the 90s
    2. 222222
      222222 20 September 2015 10: 28 New
      0
      EvgNik SU Today, 06:10
      Well no. It’s written that there’s nothing to add. "
      .. Anatoly did not take into account .. America’s new weapon ... laughing
      .. "According to The Washington Post,
      http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1481790.html
    3. Karabanov
      Karabanov 20 September 2015 11: 57 New
      +1
      Quote: EvgNik
      Well no. It is written that there is nothing to add.

      Hackneyed Truths. Frankly, Wasserman in this article, well, just Captain Evidence.
      1. Beaver
        Beaver 20 September 2015 18: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: Karabanov
        Hackneyed Truths.


        And here is what, for example, one famous British wrote:

        "When Cambria started, they told us the Eternal World:
        Drop ground weapons, call strangers to a feast!
        And they sold us, unarmed, into slavery, to the enemy under the yell,
        And the Gods of the Alphabetical Truths said: "Believe, but not to everyone!"
  3. nozdrevat58
    nozdrevat58 20 September 2015 06: 19 New
    +12
    ... Russia is compelled to constantly develop its military industry and to conduct full-scale re-equipment of troops with new weapons and military equipment, capable, if necessary, of resisting any possible aggression.
    This is not an easy measure, but a necessity. The military industry is, first and foremost, advanced technologies, and this is an impetus to the development of civilian production. And the development of peaceful industry. in turn, it would not be possible without a strong defense power of the country. The circle is closed ...
    1. tulaev
      tulaev 20 September 2015 13: 57 New
      -17
      the military industry in Russia is a grave digger of civilian production.
      There are many reasons for this from the principles of profit generation in fulfilling state defense orders, and the banal lack of normal, barrier-free access to state defense orders for non-state companies ...
      The circle really closed, the elephant inserted the trunk in his ass ..
      1. family tree
        family tree 20 September 2015 18: 45 New
        +1
        Quote: tulaev
        and the banal lack of normal, barrier-free access to state defense orders for non-state companies ...

        Yes, itch! One non-state projection was piled here. They began to understand, in relation to the terrain, the support in the well, SIP35kv / mm, KL 95kv / mm in the machine for 80A, and all this to a private house.
        Madhouse, but with a license what
      2. msm
        msm 21 September 2015 10: 45 New
        0
        commonplace lack of normal, barrier-free access to public defense
        I must honestly admit that there is no access for capitalists to budget money!
      3. Raindragon
        Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 11 New
        0
        I completely agree, the Russian military-industrial complex is a grave digger, and he digs a hole for NATO, digs, and the bloc itself helps him. There are hopes that he will dig under the west
    2. bergma
      bergma 21 September 2015 00: 57 New
      0
      Quote: nozdrevat58
      The military industry is, first and foremost, advanced technologies, and this is an impetus to the development of civilian production.

      Depends on the country. Not everywhere like that.
  4. Vityok
    Vityok 20 September 2015 06: 23 New
    +14
    by its mere existence to discourage even the thoughts of a probable adversary from engaging in a real battle!
    I fully support! Not even to dream of them !!
    1. Penzyac
      Penzyac 20 September 2015 09: 51 New
      0
      Quote: Vitek
      by its mere existence to discourage even the thoughts of a probable adversary from engaging in a real battle!
      I fully support! Not even to dream of them !!

      C'mon, let it be a dream. Nightmares sober up well ...
  5. afdjhbn67
    afdjhbn67 20 September 2015 06: 30 New
    -4
    an article with simplicity unusual for Wasserman, a sensation for a school wall newspaper ..
    1. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 20 September 2015 09: 33 New
      +5
      So ONONOTOLE writes it this way for “especially gifted” people who received education by lighting a primer for two in corn with grandfather!
      1. 23 region
        23 region 20 September 2015 19: 28 New
        0
        Quote: kartalovkolya

        afdjhbn67
        an article with simplicity unusual for Wasserman, a sensation for a school wall newspaper ..


        Quote: kartalovkolya
        So ONONOTOLE writes it this way for “especially gifted” people who received education by lighting a primer for two in corn with grandfather!

        Well, let him send him to Dom2.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 20 September 2015 12: 04 New
      +2
      So, ingenious - everything is simple. The same is true, and so what? Repetition is the mother of learning. Prayers and those every day do not correspond.
  6. yuriy55
    yuriy55 20 September 2015 07: 01 New
    +7
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!

    Worthy words and correct ones, as well as the fact that the equipment itself and weapons without a man, his skill is a piece of iron. And it is commendable that recently our Army and Navy are not only in the process of rearmament, but also in constant study and training.

    It remains to these words of Anatoly Alexandrovich add the words of Alexander Vasilyevich:
    No battle can be won in the office.
    soldier
    1. Raindragon
      Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 15 New
      +1
      Somewhere I heard this: "We will sell the army, but what if the war? Are we throwing bundles of dollar bills on the enemy?" So even if at least part of the money goes to really protect the people, and not in the pockets of the West’s sneakers
  7. moskowit
    moskowit 20 September 2015 07: 13 New
    +8
    Russia must have an army armed with the most modern weapons. And to this we must make every effort. And these weapons must be owned and controlled by experts of the highest class!
    1. Beaver
      Beaver 20 September 2015 18: 42 New
      +1
      Those who are not able to fend for themselves are not considered or even talked to. I take everything that I like and keep quiet, endured! Do we need it?
      It’s better to be strong, if only so, just in case, especially in the company of such “gopniks” as the USA and the EU.
      1. bergma
        bergma 21 September 2015 01: 00 New
        -6
        Quote: Castor
        Who is not able to fend for themselves, no one counts or even talks. I take away everything that I like and keep quiet, endured!

        Do you mean the USSR?
        1. Beaver
          Beaver 21 September 2015 07: 08 New
          0
          Quote: bergma
          Do you mean the USSR?

          What period of the USSR?
          1. bergma
            bergma 21 September 2015 08: 44 New
            -4
            Quote: Castor
            What period of the USSR?

            Any. Which one do you like.
            1. Beaver
              Beaver 21 September 2015 10: 44 New
              0
              Quote: bergma
              Any.


              What are you caught?
              1. bergma
                bergma 21 September 2015 10: 54 New
                -1
                Quote: Castor
                What are you caught?

                Who cares?
                1. Beaver
                  Beaver 21 September 2015 11: 21 New
                  0
                  Quote: bergma
                  Who cares?


                  For the USSR, no.
                  1. bergma
                    bergma 21 September 2015 11: 26 New
                    -1
                    Quote: Castor
                    For the USSR, no

                    Glad you agree with me.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Raindragon
        Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 19 New
        0
        I support, only a strong country can at least somehow change the alignment on the world stage, only this way they will not be able to threaten us with a "nuclear club", only in a strong country can we count on tomorrow
  8. Tusv
    Tusv 20 September 2015 08: 03 New
    +10
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!

    I observed a situation when 2 paratrooper officers drank vodka, and a group of 10 very belligerent young people were doing the same. One officer stood up and said: “Well Che. Mahach?” - the militancy somehow abruptly went out and disappeared in an unknown direction.
    Russia Mother she is kind, always escorts to the house. Someone to Berlin, someone to Paris. Someone wants to be up to Washington?
    1. family tree
      family tree 20 September 2015 12: 17 New
      +2
      Quote: Tusv
      Russia Mother she is kind, always escorts to the house.

      I read it and recalled the joke from Vladimirich, from Nikulin Yuri, the kingdom of heaven to him.
      Two ICBMs meet, American and ours, in space, essno
      -ABOUT! By a hundred?
      -Hi! Pour it in!
      -How are you, all capitalism? well, between the first and second bullet did not fly drinks
      -And do you connect all the proletarians? Why don’t we bite?
      -We, Russians, and after the third we don’t bite, we will drinks
      - Oh, it’s getting worse for me, I’m probably going home belay
      - Don’t be afraid, I will see you straight to home yes
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 20 September 2015 12: 32 New
        0
        Quote: perepilka
        - Don’t be afraid, I will see you straight to home

        This American pervert is constantly making her skirt short. My eggs and holster will be visible soon.
        Here it is. Where the American concern comes from. Wherever you look, it’s all the same ... (Next, an ode to the feminine)
    2. bergma
      bergma 21 September 2015 01: 02 New
      -6
      Quote: Tusv
      I watched a situation when 2 paratrooper officers drank vodka,

      What, just like that, sitting in uniform and drinking vodka? Or did they have badges on silicone breasts? You are our dreamer.
  9. socol562
    socol562 20 September 2015 08: 06 New
    0
    Without the Russian army, no where!
  10. Gardamir
    Gardamir 20 September 2015 08: 35 New
    -1
    Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army equipped with the latest technology, capable only of its existence to repel even the thoughts of a possible opponent to engage in real combat!
    I do not argue. But why did we destroy the Soviet Union, if everything is like then?
    1. bocsman
      bocsman 20 September 2015 08: 48 New
      +8
      Quote: Gardamir
      I do not argue. But why did we destroy the Soviet Union, if everything is like then?

      The answer to your question becomes clear now when you look at the betrayal by the former republics of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries! But was it necessary to feed all this su..ch..yu pack!?
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 20 September 2015 11: 46 New
        +6
        Gardamir! The answer is this. And as they saw the elegant Paradise Gobachev, everyone in the European Union wanted them to become such. For some reason they did not. Not without saying that such a Glory Zaitsev did it. But this pack rushed to the European Union, thinking that they too would become so. Not steel!
    2. Raindragon
      Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 25 New
      +1
      There is such a thing, they call democracy. Everyone wanted freedom, but no one said that it was the freedom to quietly die of hunger, fall on busy streets and not find help. The freedom to be weak and defenseless ... And when they found out it was too late request
  11. Buffalo
    Buffalo 20 September 2015 09: 03 New
    -13
    Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
    Expresses common truths with a smart look.
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 20 September 2015 10: 06 New
      +5
      Quote: Bison
      Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
      Expresses common truths with a smart look.

      A man’s soul hurts for Odessa and what shit governs his city
      1. Buffalo
        Buffalo 20 September 2015 20: 46 New
        -1
        It's not about Odessa. And for the fact that he repeats, like a parrot, what everyone has long known.
        You do not know why rearm the army?
    2. datur
      datur 20 September 2015 20: 59 New
      0
      [quote = Bison] Already got this ubiquitous Wasserman!
      He speaks common truths with an intelligent air .--- so eu they ask him, he answers !!! wink In general, smart JEWS !!! Some rulers of Judea today, to him, but listen to !!!! but it’s not destiny to see, everything HAPPENED !!!! repeat wink
  12. veksha50
    veksha50 20 September 2015 09: 07 New
    +6
    “Such a state as Russia is simply obliged to have a worthy army, equipped with the latest technology, capable of discouraging even the thoughts of a probable opponent from a mere adversary!” ...


    Anatoly drove a nail ... Well, what else can I add ??? !!!

    Program for action ...
    1. Buffalo
      Buffalo 20 September 2015 20: 50 New
      0
      And what, without him, there are no smart people in the army and in the military-industrial complex?
      And the fact that repeating the word “sugar” every hour 300 times in the mouth will not become sweeter.
  13. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 20 September 2015 09: 08 New
    +9
    Probably the smartest, but still a little naive Anatoly Aleksandrovich wants to reach out to the brains of the liberal wing of our ruling elite with such obvious simplicity of the article, to whom the money spent on defense seems unnecessary and unnecessary (after all, they are just friends, but even outside the ocean!).
    PS Yes, so Wasserman is now also a burnt separatist (according to the Ukrainian authorities)! A new title in a series of his titles.
    1. 1goose3
      1goose3 20 September 2015 09: 33 New
      +5
      I agree. But still, some need to explain why they put on a bulletproof vest and take weapons for the time they meet with an inadequate, to the teeth, armed, opponent.
      1. Amurets
        Amurets 20 September 2015 11: 58 New
        +6
        Instead of the TRP complex, it is necessary to introduce the passing of the norms of the Airborne Forces of the Airborne Forces in all ministries. Then you will feel what a soldier’s life is. And do not roll a barrel on Wasserman for simple truths. This is an axiom. And you need to know the axiom.
  14. Andryukha G
    Andryukha G 20 September 2015 09: 38 New
    +5
    No words
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 20 September 2015 11: 37 New
      +8
      And they were here too ..

      and here...
      Work was carried out on the rocket, and its new modification CZ-2C F-01 on November 26, 1975, successfully launched into orbit the first satellite in China, which then ...


      And here we are always the first ... Especially delivers an inflatable rubber gateway through which Leonov as if transferred from a spaceship to outer space.

      1. family tree
        family tree 20 September 2015 12: 39 New
        +10
        And here, too, Kabul, and what has become ...

        For shuravi drinks
      2. NordUral
        NordUral 20 September 2015 21: 47 New
        0
        But he was partially inflatable. An excellent, moreover, decision that saved, by the way, Leonov’s life, the floor of his own words.
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 20 September 2015 10: 20 New
    +7
    A state like Russia is simply obliged to have a decent army

    A. Wasserman - a purely civilian person, far from the army and he understands the need to have a strong army. And take some of the former and current members of the government that we hear from them. It is necessary to reduce the military budget. And this is said by people who, owing to their official duties, are obliged to take care of the defense capabilities of the state.
  16. Tatarname
    Tatarname 20 September 2015 10: 22 New
    0
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. Now I suppose clichés like “do not want to feed your army ..” should be good with fists, and so on ... winked

    I agree. We learned nothing new in the article. Mr. Wasserman, of course, considers himself an erudite and intelligent person, so let him give out something original. And they learn to repeat at school from the 1st grade.
    1. MIKHAN
      MIKHAN 20 September 2015 11: 04 New
      +1
      Quote: Tatarname
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      as our "sworn friends" would say: nude veritas ... Onotole, voiced common truths. Now I suppose clichés like “do not want to feed your army ..” should be good with fists, and so on ... winked

      I agree. We learned nothing new in the article. Mr. Wasserman, of course, considers himself an erudite and intelligent person, so let him give out something original. And they learn to repeat at school from the 1st grade.

      Let Israel write something in such a cliche or vice versa ... So I would read! Weak Wassermann? Enough in the soul of the Russian poking around! bully
    2. Raindragon
      Raindragon 21 September 2015 14: 29 New
      0
      Well, what can you do, sometimes people need to repeat ten times to get it, and then ten more so that at least they start to do something ... Russian man, he harnesses for a long time, but travels quickly
  17. atamankko
    atamankko 20 September 2015 10: 28 New
    +4
    This article is for smart and not very ... for everyone.
  18. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 20 September 2015 10: 55 New
    +1
    Wasserman often writes here and not bad .... But I don’t believe the men! He repainted once! And again, after all, he can .... He sings too sweetly (it feels like he's picking his heart and looking for .. slack) ... Well, I don’t know, genes are just whispering, DO NOT BELIEVE! hi
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 20 September 2015 12: 09 New
      +1
      Meehan! But does a person have no right to make a mistake?
  19. roskot
    roskot 20 September 2015 11: 34 New
    +5
    We have been tankers since childhood. Life is forcing.
    1. bergma
      bergma 21 September 2015 01: 11 New
      -3
      Poor kids. With such and such parents.
  20. ASK505
    ASK505 20 September 2015 13: 10 New
    +3
    Pushkin gave an accurate description of the French in several of his works, starting from the famous: "Monsieur Labe is a wretched Frenchman ..." Onegin.


    Alexander Pushkin
    “Mr. Beranger's Reputation”


    Do you remember, ah, your nobleness,
    Monsieur Frenchman, shitty captain,
    As we remember in common people
    Victory over the unchrist of the Russians?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how beyond the mountains of Suvorov
    Having stepped over, attacked you by surprise?
    How our old man ruffled you, flayer,
    And crushed you on the nail, like a flea?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how I drove all of Europe
    Are we alone with your Bonaparte Buyan?
    French then we saw many assholes,
    Yes, and your shitty captain!
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how your king burns
    Suddenly stupefied, like a tambourine goal and bald,
    Like on fire of a Moscow fire
    Did you fry our rats in Moscow?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not different from others, so. to tell;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember the fake songwriter
    You, our frost among native snow
    And the batteries are a perky heater,
    Soldier bayonet and noose Cossacks?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say, your mother?

    Do you remember how we were in Paris
    Where is our cossack il regimental our pop
    He fooled you, sat down closer to the wine,
    And praised your wives yes b?
    Though it’s not a lot to us,
    We are not among the others, so to speak;
    But we’ve punished you severely,
    Do you remember, say your mother is fucking young
  21. arrows
    arrows 20 September 2015 16: 22 New
    0
    I’m afraid to prophesy, but Chevalier and Schermi seem to be on the way (they are trash and charomyigs) ☺
  22. GraveBezKresta
    GraveBezKresta 20 September 2015 17: 43 New
    +3
    "Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army"
    Anatoly Wasserman, why Russia does not plant Serdyukov with Vasilyeva? It may be better to write such an article, "How to rearm an army, if thieves are not planted, EVERYTHING IS EQUAL TO EVERYTHING TORN.
    1. 23 region
      23 region 20 September 2015 19: 44 New
      0
      Quote: Grave without Cross
      "Anatoly Wasserman. Why should Russia rearm the army" Anatoly Wasserman, why Russia does not plant Serdyukov with Vasilyeva? It might be better to write such an article "How can you rearm an army if thieves are not planted, EVERYTHING IS EVERYTHING RIPPED."

      It’s impossible to cope on its own;
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. Lenin
    Lenin 20 September 2015 19: 59 New
    +2
    Certainly, a strong army is needed for Russia, but one should not forget about reliable rear services. Without a strong rear of the army there will be tryndets. Yes, and to fight for the resources actually belonging to the oligarchs that there is not much desire.
    1. NordUral
      NordUral 20 September 2015 21: 41 New
      +4
      In vain minus - in the oligarchic liberal system all our problems.
  24. NordUral
    NordUral 20 September 2015 21: 40 New
    +1
    Of course, it’s a pity that ordinary people are unfinished or unfinished, but they will have to arm themselves. The world is becoming very scary. And UB.lyudk. In the Naglosaks (to the people does not apply) will stop only power, and smart power.
  25. yehat
    yehat 21 September 2015 11: 34 New
    0
    The army is being reequipped, but this is only a small infusion so that it at least "matches". The thieves gathering is simply afraid that he will be robbed from abroad.
    We need much more radical steps that were taken in the USSR
    We need new means, on new principles of action. Most of today's developments are projects with a 30-50 year old beard. Both the armata and the T50 are simply the completion of very old projects. But in order to take radical steps forward, you need to change the economy. Stop playing "services" when an unfair mark-up due to monopolies, kickbacks, etc. makes no sense any undertaking.
    1. Kunar
      Kunar 22 September 2015 05: 40 New
      +2
      Repost to the topic. Could not pass by .....

      How so!

      In Britain, they are sorting out how Indian pilots in the Russian SU-30 could beat the British with a score of 12: 0. The situation is especially piquant given the fact that SU is almost three times cheaper than Typhoons. In preparation for the war with Russia “to confront the Russian threat”, the British command recently organized special exercises for their pilots involving Indian aircraft.

      The trick was that the Indian pilots "fought" against the British "Typhoons" on the Russian-made SU-30. That is, the idea was that the British pilots learned to fight specifically against Russian aircraft. The Hindus defeated the British, having won a duel with a total score of 12: 0! In Britain, they are sorting out how this could be. Especially considering the fact that SU is almost three times cheaper than Typhoons.

      PS: So this is in addition an export version of the SU-30 with reduced characteristics. And at the helm of Buddhist contemplators. In short, they may not even come close to the SU-35. It seems that the war is being postponed.
  26. japs
    japs 21 September 2015 12: 35 New
    +4
    Wasserman is right. Although this is an axiom, it must be constantly repeated to uncles in the government so that there are no thoughts about different "Mistals".
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. Old warrior
    Old warrior 21 September 2015 18: 18 New
    0
    Everything is correct. Learn mat. part, Combat Charter and DOSAAF brochure "Fighting enemy ground and air targets" 1988. Moscow. At the same time, we are studying the experience of the relevant authorities in countering the internal threats of the State.
  29. vell.65
    vell.65 21 September 2015 22: 25 New
    0
    Quote: Evgeniy667b
    Au ... on Olympus, do you understand everything?

    Yes, they understand everything, but their pocket is closer.