Syria: Russia can not be forbidden to fight with the IG

Russia, on a par with the coalition, should be able to strike at the Islamic State, Syria’s representative to the UN, Bashar Jafari, told reporters. His words leads RIA News.




“Why are the Americans fighting against their IS the Air Force, and Russia should be banned?” Does this make sense? No In the end, we are fighting the same enemy, ”said Jafari.

As Western media reported the day before, at the Russian base in Syria, there are now about 200 marines and dozens of armored vehicles.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov said that "Moscow has never concealed that it has provided and will continue to provide the Syrian leadership with military-technical support for the fight against terrorism." In addition, according to the press, the issues of fighting the IG can be the subject of discussion at a meeting of US and Russian presidents.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Decathlon 17 September 2015 10: 31 New
    • 27
    • 0
    +27
    With all due respect to Syria: Russia does NOTHING !!! can not be banned! It may be great-power, but I so want ...
    1. Finches 17 September 2015 10: 37 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      You, my friend, are a great-power chauvinist, however! laughing

      Let them forbid - I’m even wondering how they will succeed !?
      1. DanSabaka 17 September 2015 12: 13 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        it’s possible to ban Russia, but it’s forbidden ....
    2. meriem1 17 September 2015 10: 38 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Decathlon
      With all due respect to Syria: Russia does NOTHING !!! can not be banned! It may be great-power, but I so want ...


      And I want to right. And also it can !!! And the matter is not at all in Great Power. This is just the default.

      You, my friend, are a great-power chauvinist, however! laughing


      And who said healthy chauvinism is bad? laughing
      1. i80186 17 September 2015 10: 41 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        They loved, at one time, to throw them into the gorges.
        1. ermak.sidorov 17 September 2015 11: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And which plane is capable of raising this ... "little thing", and then dropping it ??? Tu-22 or what?
          1. PSih2097 17 September 2015 13: 41 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: ermak.sidorov
            And which plane is capable of raising this ... "little thing", and then dropping it ??? Tu-22 or what?

            Its carriers were Tu-95, TU-16, TU-22, 3M and M4 bombers. Of the currently available only Tu-95MS and Tu-160 theoretically can carry such bombs, but practically not. Tu-95MS according to its instructions is called a platform and can only use cruise missiles suspended on an internal suspension. For other purposes, it is not intended. Tu-160 can carry all kinds of bombs, but it is a strategic bomber. Thus, the Tu-95 and Tu-160 are adapted for missiles, and the carriers of this bomb were not in service.
            1. ermak.sidorov 17 September 2015 21: 37 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Thank you for the clarification!
              It is a pity that the "baby" is now not in business ...
        2. KasDS 17 September 2015 12: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And what is this beauty? what
          1. PSih2097 17 September 2015 13: 34 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: KasDS
            And what is this beauty? what

            either FAB-5000, or FAB-9000, they are of a similar design, differ in size and weight.
      2. Finches 17 September 2015 10: 52 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I personally haven’t said such a thing, which is bad! hi
    3. vodolaz 17 September 2015 10: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Yes, everything is very simple: NATO in general and the United States in particular are fighting ISIS in such a way that God forbid not to hurt any of the terrorists, otherwise it’s a pity they themselves trained.
  2. Barakuda 17 September 2015 10: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Syrian representative to the UN Bashar Jafari

    Bent a little, or the "volunteers" of Spain and Korea, we recall Vietnam.
    Does Russia need this? And the peasant boys who went to the DNR-LNR of their own free will. request
  3. sl22277 17 September 2015 10: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Type themselves spawned, and kill ourselves! I doubt it, apparently it will continue until ISIS again becomes controlled by Washington. But Russia is very hindering this. Therefore, Russia's early proposals against military intervention from outside were rejected.
  4. siberalt 17 September 2015 10: 34 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Should Russia fight with the IG? Of course not. This is not our war. It seems that it costs us to climb there, as the whole coalition will support the opposition, and we will be the second Afghan, and Russia will be exposed as the world aggressor. This is what the West needs.
    1. Rarahin 17 September 2015 11: 17 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: siberalt
      Should Russia fight the IS? Of course not. This is not our war.


      Let amera continue to train them, shell them in real combat conditions, supply them. Packs are delivered to Europe, Ukraine, it is possible that to Russia.
      And when everything is ready they will be thrown at us.
      Then it will be our war, and we will participate in it. All.
      After all, she will go on our land ...

      Do you want that?!
    2. Stanislas 17 September 2015 11: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: siberalt
      It seems that if we get in there, the whole coalition will support the opposition
      You are confusing the times: this whole faceted coalition supported the "opposition" (including the "opposition ISIS members"), when we had not even thought of strengthening our military presence in that region.
      1. donavi49 17 September 2015 11: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But the question is, how?

        Now they give a little TOU, riflemen, TPV from the Americans, plus any non-military, medicine, etc. Sponsors help more with weapons, but situationally, in the north of the Turks, in the south, the king of Jordan allocates weapons to those he likes.

        However they can run Cyclone-2 according to the principle, we’ll fill them with weapons indiscriminately into whose hands and let them cook themselves. And then what? If they have commodity quantities of Milan, TOU, stingers in the sense of hundreds on a medium-sized gang. New types of mines, high-explosive carriages, factory detonators of all types, etc.?

        It is not worth considering that the Americans do not have a window of opportunity to strengthen the second side. And they can do it cleanly, through the same Jordanians and Turks.
  5. Mcarrow 17 September 2015 10: 34 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    That's right, the whole world recognized that ISIS is a terrorist. Assad allows you to run around the technique at the same time. If only our second generals wouldn’t flinch.
  6. Vladimir71 17 September 2015 10: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    An ideal testing ground for testing new types of weapons, why shoot at targets and old trash when you can see the real result and determine the results on the enemy’s manpower.
  7. Nord2015 17 September 2015 10: 36 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And suddenly, with the help of Russian weapons, ISIS will be chased from Syria, Assad will not be overthrown. Yes, and in ISIS itself, for the Americans there are most likely the right people (most people) - they will suddenly suffer. Here are mattresses and fear for their own.
  8. V.ic 17 September 2015 10: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    “Why do Americans fight against IS with their Air Force, and should this be banned for Russia?

    In the first part, a mistake, I think, USA is not fighting ISIS, but most likely with those groups that are beginning to "greyhound" against the curator.
    1. abrakadabre 17 September 2015 13: 59 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Mostly the US is fighting there against infrastructure. Any. That's when everyone is bombed to the state of the Stone Age: cities, factories ... any objects that are created there, then it’s good for them. Then that ISIS, that shmigil ... with spears against the "light elves of the west" you won’t win much.
  9. roskot 17 September 2015 10: 47 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Try to ban !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. kil 31 17 September 2015 10: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    How can it be banned? A sovereign state, asks for assistance from the Air Force from another sovereign state. I do not see the possibility of a ban.
  11. shinobi 17 September 2015 11: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is interesting, purely theoretically, how the UN can ban the Russian Federation something in Syria, if the Russian Federation has an official invitation and permission from the authorities. Authorities recognized by the UN. And what exactly will this ban give? Which of the NATO countries will decide to shoot down the Russian Air Force transporters or sink our ships Navy? Such curiosity is unhealthy.
  12. Dimka999 17 September 2015 11: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why should Russia get involved in the war against the IGL ??
    1. Cananecat 17 September 2015 11: 40 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It’s better to fight now in Syria than in a couple of three years across the southern border of the Russian Federation
    2. KnightRider 17 September 2015 18: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Dimka999
      Why should Russia get involved in the war against the IGL ??

      Russia is already at war, at the hands of the Syrian army, supplying it with modern weapons and military equipment, providing intelligence, etc. If our Air Force joins the war (and it seems that this is all), the initiative can quickly go over to the side of Assad’s troops, a turning point in this war will come. What the Americans are very afraid of, hence their hysteria.
  13. Diviz 17 September 2015 11: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In Syria, no one will restore order except us. It is beneficial for foreigners to hang problems in Russia. How do you understand the Australian Air Force struck the igil. China is even closer than Australia. But there is no Canada and Australia, it matters, although geographically this does not concern them at all. And they bombed the infrastructure, destroyed the chaos and sowed. And in the elections they got the support of the people and they solve the general problem as it were. We need to put modern weapons into Syria and introduce a no-fly zone.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt 17 September 2015 12: 42 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      [quote = DiViZ] In Syria, no one will restore order except us.

      And why do not we clean up the outskirts or fight for the Donbass? Why is Syria better? laughing
  14. press officer 17 September 2015 11: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Rarahin
    And when everything is ready they will be thrown at us.
    Then it will be our war, and we will participate in it. All.
    After all, she will go on our land ...

    Do you want that?!



    Correctly! Do you think the mattresses screamed so that they saw us there ?! But that's why they howled, because they understand that we will really destroy the IG, and not like them, only in the media! Who has already said that they caught red-handed mattresses that the IG throws off food, cartridges, etc. etc. that’s why our “partners” howl and write fairy tales about us .. Only the world seems to have few refugees and wars and everything else, including total control over all countries, one country where murderers without a clan and tribe live! So who is occupying whom then?
  15. rotmistr60 17 September 2015 11: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Not the desire of the Americans to use our Air Force to combat IS is understandable. If ours start to strike, it’s specifically on the positions of the Islamic State, and not on the Syrians and Kurds, as the so-called coalition.
  16. Mainbeam 17 September 2015 11: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Why do Americans fight against IS with their Air Force, and should this be banned for Russia? Does that make sense? Nothing. Finally, we fight against the same enemy"Said Jafari

    Pretty boy. Yankos trollite. If ours begin to strike at ISIS, then soon all the terrorists trained by the Americans will end.
  17. 34 region 17 September 2015 12: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Guys! Do you think Russia will bomb ISIS on all fronts? I doubt it. Most likely they will bomb around Syria. To preserve the Syrian bridgehead. This of course will be a test of our weapons gaining military experience by our military experts. What's bad about it? In general, Russia will not give up the bear cub Syria. Another question. Why are our Israeli friends silent about ISIS? Everyone is worried and only they remain calm. It is interesting to know their view of ISIS. He does not threaten them? Why do refugees stick to Europe? You can’t go to Israel? It’s also a good country. Strange spontaneity of refugees, simultaneously rush to Europe. After all, the war is not going on for the first year.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt 17 September 2015 12: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Refugees from Syria no more than 30%. In addition, some of them are covered with fake passports purchased in Syria. If this is a fake of the Western media, then why doesn’t anyone refute it?
  18. silver_roman 17 September 2015 13: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “Why are the Americans fighting against their IS the Air Force, and Russia should be banned?” Does this make sense? No In the end, we are fighting the same enemy, ”said Jafari.

    as long as such phrases flash in the words of Syrian politicians, there will be no understanding, at least not among the Western public.
    They basically have nothing to do with the truth. The IS is not an enemy of syshya, if al-Qaeda tried to threaten at least in words, then these do not soar. IG is part of syshya. how to bomb yourself - masochism.
    As soon as the civilians of the coalition of Western countries begin to perish NEXT times, it will be very convenient to say: "the Russians missed again, and we warned that they should not get in here ..."
  19. 34 region 17 September 2015 13: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: siberalt
    Refugees from Syria no more than 30%. In addition, some of them are covered with fake passports purchased in Syria. If this is a fake of the Western media, then why doesn’t anyone refute it?

    They will not refute themselves! And all who can run there. Here are just a similar porridge can brew in Europe. The conflict of indigenous and migrants. It's at home here. Or came and left, or stayed in your apartment for permanent residence.