Syria: Russia can not be forbidden to fight with the IG

Russia, on a par with the coalition, should be able to strike at the Islamic State, Syria’s representative to the UN, Bashar Jafari, told reporters. His words leads RIA News.

“Why are the Americans fighting against their IS the Air Force, and Russia should be banned?” Does this make sense? No In the end, we are fighting the same enemy, ”said Jafari.

As Western media reported the day before, at the Russian base in Syria, there are now about 200 marines and dozens of armored vehicles.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov said that "Moscow has never concealed that it has provided and will continue to provide the Syrian leadership with military-technical support for the fight against terrorism." In addition, according to the press, the issues of fighting the IG can be the subject of discussion at a meeting of US and Russian presidents.

Comments

[Decathlon]

With all due respect to Syria: Russia does NOTHING !!! can not be banned! It may be great-power, but I so want ...

[Finches]

You, my friend, are a great-power chauvinist, however!

Let them forbid - I’m even wondering how they will succeed !?

[DanSabaka]

it’s possible to ban Russia, but it’s forbidden ....

[meriem1]

Quote: Decathlon

With all due respect to Syria: Russia does NOTHING !!! can not be banned! It may be great-power, but I so want ...

And I want to right. And also it can !!! And the matter is not at all in Great Power. This is just the default.

You, my friend, are a great-power chauvinist, however! laughing

And who said healthy chauvinism is bad?

[i80186]

They loved, at one time, to throw them into the gorges.

[ermak.sidorov]

And what plane is capable of lifting this ... "little thing" and then dropping it ??? Tu-22 or what?

[PSih2097]

Quote: ermak.sidorov

And what plane is capable of lifting this ... "little thing" and then dropping it ??? Tu-22 or what?

Its carriers were Tu-95, TU-16, TU-22, 3M and M4 bombers. Of the currently available only Tu-95MS and Tu-160 theoretically can carry such bombs, but practically not. Tu-95MS according to its instructions is called a platform and can only use cruise missiles suspended on an internal suspension. For other purposes, it is not intended. Tu-160 can carry all kinds of bombs, but it is a strategic bomber. Thus, the Tu-95 and Tu-160 are adapted for missiles, and the carriers of this bomb were not in service.

[ermak.sidorov]

Thank you for the clarification!
It is a pity that the "baby" is out of business now ...

[KasDS]

And what is this beauty?

[PSih2097]

Quote: KasDS

And what is this beauty?

either FAB-5000, or FAB-9000, they are of a similar design, differ in size and weight.

[Finches]

I personally haven’t said such a thing, which is bad!

[vodolaz]

Yes, everything is very simple: NATO in general and the United States in particular are fighting ISIS in such a way that God forbid not to hurt any of the terrorists, otherwise it’s a pity they themselves trained.

[Barakuda]

Syrian representative to the UN Bashar Jafari

Bent a little, or "volunteers" of Spain and Korea, we remember Vietnam.
Does Russia need this? And the peasant boys who went to the DNR-LNR of their own free will.

[sl22277]

Type themselves spawned, and kill ourselves! I doubt it, apparently it will continue until ISIS again becomes controlled by Washington. But Russia is very hindering this. Therefore, Russia's early proposals against military intervention from outside were rejected.

[siberalt]

Should Russia fight with the IG? Of course not. This is not our war. It seems that it costs us to climb there, as the whole coalition will support the opposition, and we will be the second Afghan, and Russia will be exposed as the world aggressor. This is what the West needs.

[Rarahin]

Quote: siberalt

Should Russia fight the IS? Of course not. This is not our war.

Let amera continue to train them, shell them in real combat conditions, supply them. Packs are delivered to Europe, Ukraine, it is possible that to Russia.
And when everything is ready they will be thrown at us.
Then it will be our war, and we will participate in it. All.
After all, she will go on our land ...

Do you want that?!

[Stanislas]

Quote: siberalt

It seems that if we get in there, the whole coalition will support the opposition

You are confusing the times: this whole squalid coalition supported the "opposition" (including the "ISIS oppositionists") when we did not even think to strengthen our military presence in that region.

[donavi49]

But the question is, how?

Now they give a little TOU, riflemen, TPV from the Americans, plus any non-military, medicine, etc. Sponsors help more with weapons, but situationally, in the north of the Turks, in the south, the king of Jordan allocates weapons to those he likes.

However they can run Cyclone-2 according to the principle, we’ll fill them with weapons indiscriminately into whose hands and let them cook themselves. And then what? If they have commodity quantities of Milan, TOU, stingers in the sense of hundreds on a medium-sized gang. New types of mines, high-explosive carriages, factory detonators of all types, etc.?

It is not worth considering that the Americans do not have a window of opportunity to strengthen the second side. And they can do it cleanly, through the same Jordanians and Turks.

[Mcarrow]

That's right, the whole world recognized that ISIS is a terrorist. Assad allows you to run around the technique at the same time. If only our second generals wouldn’t flinch.

[Vladimir71]

An ideal testing ground for testing new types of weapons, why shoot at targets and old trash when you can see the real result and determine the results on the enemy’s manpower.

[Nord2015]

And suddenly, with the help of Russian weapons, ISIS will be chased from Syria, Assad will not be overthrown. Yes, and in ISIS itself, for the Americans there are most likely the right people (most people) - they will suddenly suffer. Here are mattresses and fear for their own.

[V.ic]

“Why do Americans fight against IS with their Air Force, and should this be banned for Russia?

As for the first part, it's a mistake, I think that the USA is not fighting with ISIL, but most likely with those groups that are beginning to "fight" against the curator.

[abrakadabre]

Basically, the US is fighting against infrastructure there. Any. That's when everything is bombed to the state of the Stone Age: cities, factories ... any objects that are created there, that's when they feel good. Then that ISIS, that shmIGIL ... with spears against the "light elves of the west" you will not fight much.

[roskot]

Try to ban !!!

[kil 31]

How can it be banned? A sovereign state, asks for assistance from the Air Force from another sovereign state. I do not see the possibility of a ban.

[shinobi]

It is interesting, purely theoretically, how the UN can ban the Russian Federation something in Syria, if the Russian Federation has an official invitation and permission from the authorities. Authorities recognized by the UN. And what exactly will this ban give? Which of the NATO countries will decide to shoot down the Russian Air Force transporters or sink our ships Navy? Such curiosity is unhealthy.

[Dimka999]

Why should Russia get involved in the war against the IGL ??

[Cananecat]

It’s better to fight now in Syria than in a couple of three years across the southern border of the Russian Federation

[Knight Rider]

Quote: Dimka999

Why should Russia get involved in the war against the IGL ??

Russia is already at war, at the hands of the Syrian army, supplying it with modern weapons and military equipment, providing intelligence, etc. If our Air Force joins the war (and it seems that this is all), the initiative can quickly go over to the side of Assad’s troops, a turning point in this war will come. What the Americans are very afraid of, hence their hysteria.

[Diviz]

In Syria, no one will restore order except us. It is beneficial for foreigners to hang problems in Russia. How do you understand the Australian Air Force struck the igil. China is even closer than Australia. But there is no Canada and Australia, it matters, although geographically this does not concern them at all. And they bombed the infrastructure, destroyed the chaos and sowed. And in the elections they got the support of the people and they solve the general problem as it were. We need to put modern weapons into Syria and introduce a no-fly zone.

[siberalt]

[quote = DiViZ] In Syria, no one will restore order except us.

And why do not we clean up the outskirts or fight for the Donbass? Why is Syria better?

[press officer]

Quote: Rarahin

And when everything is ready they will be thrown at us.
Then it will be our war, and we will participate in it. All.
After all, she will go on our land ...

Do you want that?!

Right! You just think the mattresses screamed that they saw us there ?! And that's why they howled, because they understand that we will actually destroy IS, and not like them, only in the media! Who has already said that they caught the mattresses red-handed, which IS throw off food, cartridges, etc. etc. that's why our "partners" howl, but they make up fairy tales about us .. Only apparently the world is still not enough refugees and wars and everything else, including total control over all countries, one country where murderers live without clan and tribe! So who recouped whom?

[rotmistr60]

Not the desire of the Americans to use our Air Force to combat IS is understandable. If ours start to strike, it’s specifically on the positions of the Islamic State, and not on the Syrians and Kurds, as the so-called coalition.

[Mainbeam]

“Why do Americans fight against IS with their Air Force, and should this be banned for Russia? Does that make sense? Nothing. Finally, we fight against the same enemy"Said Jafari

Pretty boy. Yankos trollite. If ours begin to strike at ISIS, then soon all the terrorists trained by the Americans will end.

[34 region]

Guys! Do you think Russia will bomb ISIS on all fronts? I doubt it. Most likely they will bomb around Syria. To preserve the Syrian bridgehead. This of course will be a test of our weapons gaining military experience by our military experts. What's bad about it? In general, Russia will not give up the bear cub Syria. Another question. Why are our Israeli friends silent about ISIS? Everyone is worried and only they remain calm. It is interesting to know their view of ISIS. He does not threaten them? Why do refugees stick to Europe? You can’t go to Israel? It’s also a good country. Strange spontaneity of refugees, simultaneously rush to Europe. After all, the war is not going on for the first year.

[siberalt]

Refugees from Syria no more than 30%. In addition, some of them are covered with fake passports purchased in Syria. If this is a fake of the Western media, then why doesn’t anyone refute it?

[silver_roman]

“Why are the Americans fighting against their IS the Air Force, and Russia should be banned?” Does this make sense? No In the end, we are fighting the same enemy, ”said Jafari.

as long as such phrases flash in the words of Syrian politicians, there will be no understanding, at least not among the Western public.
They basically have nothing to do with the truth. The IS is not an enemy of syshya, if al-Qaeda tried to threaten at least in words, then these do not soar. IG is part of syshya. how to bomb yourself - masochism.
As soon as civilians start to die ONCE AGAINST under the fire of the coalition of Western countries, it will be very convenient to say: "again the Russians missed, and we warned that they shouldn't get in here ..."

[34 region]

Quote: siberalt

Refugees from Syria no more than 30%. In addition, some of them are covered with fake passports purchased in Syria. If this is a fake of the Western media, then why doesn’t anyone refute it?

They will not refute themselves! And all who can run there. Here are just a similar porridge can brew in Europe. The conflict of indigenous and migrants. It's at home here. Or came and left, or stayed in your apartment for permanent residence.