Iraqi authorities are against the entry into the country of a foreign military contingent

22
According to the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iraq, Ahmed Jamal, Baghdad is categorically against the deployment of foreign military contingent in the country regardless of pretexts for the introduction of foreign troops. Ahmed Jamal in an interview with the news agency Sputnik noted that Iraq "already has a bitter experience" associated with the deployment in the country of a foreign military contingent.

Iraqi authorities are against the entry into the country of a foreign military contingent


Iraqi MFA representative:

Some American military leaders and generals in the international antiterrorist coalition have hinted that ground troops should be sent to Iraq to fight the "Islamic State". But Iraq already has the bitter experience of the presence of US troops in our territory.


According to Ahmed Jamal, to fight the so-called “Islamic State”, Iraq does not need to reintroduce foreign armies, but needs logistical assistance, assistance in intelligence activities, assistance weapons.

Recall that the militants of the "Islamic State" hold under their control large areas of Iraq, including numerous oil-producing facilities. One of the fields of ISIL is illegal oil production with its subsequent sale at prices that are significantly lower than market prices.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    17 September 2015 07: 15
    Let them into the house, they are the master and they will drive them out!
    1. +4
      17 September 2015 07: 29
      You can understand "endured", the states have "benefited" so much that the poor are still shaking, but will they be able to do something on their own?
      Great doubts exist.
      Now in Iraq only the Kurds are combat-ready-that is who they need to arm, but be afraid, otherwise Iraq will fall apart.
      Those. IG has all the chances to still use Iraqi oil.
    2. +12
      17 September 2015 07: 31
      And no one will ask Iraq, they are the same puppets as Ukraine
    3. 0
      17 September 2015 07: 49
      In general, I am amazed at how they were able to get rid of the mattresses, they probably exhorted them with an oath of fidelity.
    4. +1
      17 September 2015 08: 26
      About the American boorish attitude towards the owner of the house, it can be seen even in documentaries about the life of the Marines in Afghanistan, they go into the kishlak house during peace talks, without taking off their dirty and dusty shoes, stepping on carpets they climb almost onto the sofa in the hall, when all the elders leave your slippers outside.
    5. +1
      17 September 2015 09: 46
      you might think their amerikosy will ask permission .. sad
  2. +5
    17 September 2015 07: 18
    The first time they entered half of the country, it was destroyed, they will once again introduce it, they will make the desert.
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 08: 22
      Quote: A1L9E4K9S
      The first time they entered half of the country, it was destroyed, they will once again introduce it, they will make the desert.


      calling us to the country is like calling an elephant to an ant disco.
  3. +7
    17 September 2015 07: 20
    Apparently have already seen enough of "peace" and "democracy", "freedom", etc.! And most importantly, we felt it ourselves! Iraq is a country that was not a source of terrorism or tension, after the intervention of Washington, destroyed and became a source of refugees from terrorism, with such a violent "Democracy".
  4. +4
    17 September 2015 07: 25
    But Iraq already has a bitter experience of the presence of US troops on our territory.

    Let's hope that the leaders of Iraq will have enough willpower to resist the US "proposals".
  5. +18
    17 September 2015 07: 28
    But Iraq already has a bitter experience of the presence of US troops on our territory
    She is freedom, in the "American" way
  6. +1
    17 September 2015 07: 29
    Now they’ll start voting at every rig, -We don’t fight ..; we are only busy with business ...
    To clean - so to clean ..! To quiet down for a long time ...
  7. +3
    17 September 2015 07: 33
    NATO will not climb into Iraq, or how it will clog over bunkers and land mines in Afghanistan .... Yes, stupid Yankees have done business!
  8. +5
    17 September 2015 07: 38
    One of the ISIS fields is the illegal extraction of oil with its subsequent sale at prices that are significantly lower than market prices.

    Damn, in Ukraine, the mericans of each of our fighters see, but here they can’t track the tanker, which is used to haul oil from ISIS, mysticism. what
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 08: 08
      This question torments me too, well, it’s clear with our opponents why they are silent — at least a reduction in oil prices, which is beneficial for its importers, which include most of the countries of the so-called West, and what about our media? Or is it also one of the trump cards in the sleeve, like possible irrefutable evidence of a downed Boeing? And about morality, apparently, it’s not worth mentioning ... Shame, gentlemen, shame ... am
      1. Nzn
        0
        17 September 2015 08: 29
        This is called not a shame, but a realpolitik :)
  9. +2
    17 September 2015 07: 52
    Quote: Vladimirets
    Damn, in Ukraine, the mericans of each of our fighters see, but here they can’t track the tanker, which they use to drag oil from ISIS, mystic

    This is a business and nothing personal. laughing
  10. +2
    17 September 2015 08: 04
    East is a delicate matter.
    The state invasion of Iraq, not only destroyed the infrastructure, but, worst of all, they destroyed the most powerful people who were able to keep the situation in the country under the secular regime.
    The creeping religious contradictions and interests of various groups finally defeated Iraq.
    Iraqis need to unite, get in touch with sensible people, agree on interaction and spheres of influence, and together drive all evil from the country.
    Representatives of different faiths lived in one country, which means they can continue to live. Understanding must come that within the framework of one country they can agree, in a chaotic model such as Ig they will be destroyed both as opponents on the other hand and as possible applicants for power within one unlimited aggressive terrorist community. Ig is the road to nowhere for everyone: both supporters and opponents.
  11. 0
    17 September 2015 08: 12
    all right, this is called let the fox into the chicken coop, the Yankees have already inherited enough and caused evil around the world, that's enough ...
  12. 0
    17 September 2015 08: 19
    Ai-ya-yay! laughing

    And yesterday Kirby said, "However, Iraq is a reliable member of our coalition."
  13. 0
    17 September 2015 08: 39
    Quote: sagitch
    Let them into the house, they are the master and they will drive them out!



    And that the owner is not yet in Europe. The owner is already on his way to Germany.
  14. +1
    17 September 2015 08: 51
    We drank enough "democracy", once was enough.
  15. +1
    17 September 2015 09: 01
    Stripes tactics are understandable.
    The people remember the humiliation and murder of American soldiers and the desecration of shrines.
    Naturally, the massacre will gradually begin. IS will take advantage of this. There is a possibility of a large-scale operation and the introduction of NATO troops to ensure "national security" without the consent of the Security Council.
  16. 0
    17 September 2015 18: 21
    Do you have American advisers, instructors in Iraq?