US again cautiously looking at the Russian Air Force

62
US again cautiously looking at the Russian Air ForceThe US military is sounding the alarm in connection with the growing military capabilities of Russia. Of particular concern to them is the Russian aviation and to an even greater extent air defense, which, according to the generals, is not inferior to the US Air Force. At the same time, American combat aircraft is rapidly aging. Are such statements justified - or are they just attempts to knock money out of the budget?

Commander-in-Chief of the United States Air Force in Europe, Frank Gorentz, said that the Air and Space Forces (VKS) of Russia had eliminated the backlog. “I don’t think that it would be controversial to say: they have overcome the gap in opportunities,” he said, commenting on military construction in Russia and the modernization of its air force.

According to Gorentz, he means both “the aircraft that they produce and the ability to create extremely well-protected” zones using access control systems, which he personally “causes more alarm”. At the same time, the general noted that the videoconferencing system of Russia managed to improve "quality and quantity," reports TASS.
From the point of view of Gorentz, in the current conditions the US Air Force will have to improve its training. “It is absolutely clear that we will have to go back (to the old practice) and start practicing the same things that we did during the Cold War,” the general believes. He did not tell in detail about the plans for such combat training.

Gorents called the Crimea and the Kaliningrad region as two well-protected areas from which the Russian armed forces are able to control part of the airspace of some NATO member countries.

This is not the first such statement in recent days. In late August, the former chief of intelligence staff of the US Air Force, Lieutenant General David Deptula, said that while the US command was relying on the actions of small units in third world countries during local conflicts, they had overlooked Russia, whose capabilities had increased significantly.

He noted that "the Russians have one of the best air defense systems on the planet." “Today, the Russians have a significant superiority of ground-to-air weapons, and in the territories protected by their own air defense systems, they have the ability to deny access to the airspace of any aircraft,” he told The Daily Beast.

In addition, last week Deptul directly called the American military aircraft "senile", recalling that the average age of the aircraft exceeds 25 years, and said it is necessary to equip the Air Force with new bomber aircraft. He demands to buy "as many bombers as possible, and as quickly as possible." According to Deptuly, last year the US Air Force purchased the smallest number of new aircraft in its stories.
And this, while the Russian Air Force is exactly the opposite - they bought the largest, record number of aircraft in the entire modern history of the country in 2014 year.

Two districts


It was no coincidence that General Gorentz cited the Crimea and the Kaliningrad Region as an example. Both of these areas are constantly being strengthened. The grouping on the peninsula began to build up immediately after the return of the Crimea to Russia. At the end of November 2014, the 14 Su-27CM and Su-30 fighters were redeployed to the Belbek airbase. Machines took up combat duty for the protection of the airspace of the Crimea. This year, Su-24 attack planes and Su-27 fighters are being replaced by Su-30.

Last year, the decision was made to deploy long-range bombers and Iskander-M operational tactical complexes on the peninsula. In addition, in July, the Ministry of Defense announced plans to strengthen the grouping on the peninsula by long-range bombers Tu-22М3. Sources of the newspaper VIEW reported that the Tu-22М3 and the Iskander-M complexes have not yet made a final decision.

Experts believe that the deployment of the Tu-22М3 strategic missile-carriers is a sufficient and comprehensive response to the antimissile base in Romania: airplanes can strike at it without entering the air defense zone. The range of their missiles reaches 600 km, the base is removed from the coast by about 400 km, and the NATO countries simply do not have ground-based means. Only fighters could try to stop the Russian missile carriers.

Kaliningrad special area is also increasing. According to the Treaty on Conventional Arms in Europe (CFE), Russia could have only two motorized rifle brigades in the region, but Moscow withdrew from this agreement, and from 2011, the grouping of troops began to build up. In particular, the radar of the early warning system of a missile attack of the Voronezh-DM type was built near Kaliningrad, and the Iskander-M complexes were deployed.

“We need to justify the budget”


The expert of the Center for Political Studies of Russia on conventional weapons, Vadim Kozyulin, expressed the opinion that General Gorentz was somewhat exaggerated. “Such statements often appear when you need to justify the budget. It is mainly during these periods that alarmist messages from the military begin. Of course, Russia’s budget has grown, new developments have begun, but the situation is far from what the general described it, ”he told the VIEW newspaper.
“This is one of the few statements in favor of our capabilities,” commented Vladimir Anokhin, Vice-President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, to the VZGLYAD statement on the statement of the American General. “Although, on the other hand, it can be understood: NATO is bursting at the seams in the international situation that has developed in Europe, and I do not rule out that this is the message: NATO should focus on any one enemy.”

“Recently, we have comprehensively approached the solution of the problem of protecting aerospace, and not only in material terms, but also in the preparation of flight personnel,” the expert believes.

Problem areas


According to Kozyulin, Russia has and still has a lag in aircraft. “The USA has been using the fifth generation airplanes for many years, they are only being tested here. If we talk about air defense, then the general probably had (in mind) first of all the fact that Russia is developing the C-500, begins the production of the C-400. But rearmament is just beginning, and the production of promising models is only planned. It’s too early for the Americans to get scared. ”

“As for the technological lag, in some areas it was not there,” said Viktor Murakhovsky, editor of the journal Arsenal of the Fatherland, in an interview with VZGLYAD. - For example, in air defense systems, in warning systems for a rocket attack, on the contrary, we have a certain lead. Indeed, we had a period when we were significantly behind in certain types of military aviation. I can not say that we completely eliminated it - for this we need to at least launch a series and put into service the fifth generation aircraft. ”

“We really eliminated the lag in the aviation weapons of destruction,” he added. - On radars, which are responsible for air traffic control, for detecting air targets, also came to the forefront. In addition, the electronic warfare systems in our country are indeed at an advanced, comparable to the American level. ”

Recall aerospace forces were formed as a result of the unification of the troops of the East Kazakhstan region and the Air Force. Aviation, air defense and missile defense forces and the Space Forces are subordinate to the commander-in-chief of the space forces, all of which are headed by his deputies.

Aviation VKS includes all types of aviation of the current Air Force, including the army. However, front and army aviation, except for fighters, is included in the VKS only structurally, but in fact it will be used in accordance with the plans of the commanders of military districts.

The fact that the VKS began to perform tasks, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said in early August.

Earlier this year, Shoigu said that by the end of the year, the Air Force and the naval aviation would receive 126 new aircraft and 88 helicopters, while the aircraft fleet should be in good condition at 80%.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    17 September 2015 14: 50
    He noted that "the Russians have one of the best air defense systems on the planet."

    Taught by experience .... Well and further down the list ....! hi
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +22
      17 September 2015 14: 53
      There is an understanding of the lack of superiority over the whole world. This is not for you to fight tribes in Africa. There will be losses and very large.
      1. +4
        17 September 2015 15: 05
        They got used to getting along with "little" blood, bombing from the air and having no anti-air defense. And here we are. With an echeloned and modern system. It seems like the air defense is purely defensive troops, but the Americans perceive them as a threat! Iraq and Serbia will fail!
        1. +9
          17 September 2015 16: 05
          Quote: Magic Archer
          bombing from the air

          He demands to buy “as many bombers as possible, and as quickly as possible”

          Give me pills for greed, but more.
        2. 0
          17 September 2015 16: 45
          Quote: Magic Archer
          that at onwith how in Iraq and Serbia will not work!

          Quote: Magic Archer
          that With us how in Iraq and Serbia will not work!
          1. 0
            19 September 2015 21: 59
            Quote: V.ic
            that With us both in Iraq and Serbia will not work!


            Eurasia has always been a "difficult target" for Europe

            Even in Roman times, their legions could not advance to Eurasia, and vice versa, our khan At Tili (speaking with horses) was able to move to Europe

            According to Murad Aji, his army was composed of: Slavs (Russian ancestors) + Kipchak steppes + Alans (Ossetian ancestors) those same, whose great-great-grandchildren then took Paris to 1812 and Berlin to 1945

            Africa and India and LA became colonies of the Western world - but Eurasia never bowed to the enslavers - we are not a "come true colony" in this, the merit of both the Russian people and the steppe-Turks - who supported their Russian brothers against a common enemy for thousands of years
      2. +2
        17 September 2015 15: 22
        Amry are still warriors. a little something immediately worried. express concern. but how they believed in this "democracy" during the 90s.
        It will be necessary to go to Crimea next year. no time
      3. 0
        17 September 2015 17: 50
        They are already written openly simply from the realization that we have what they will do in case (God forbid, of course) of a real combat use of all this ...
        1. +1
          17 September 2015 21: 44
          The very possibility of getting change causes a panic among American warriors. They are used to fighting when the enemy is unarmed and his hands are tied. Here they are heroes.
      4. 0
        17 September 2015 23: 36
        There is an understanding of the lack of superiority over the whole world. This is not for you to fight tribes in Africa. There will be losses and very large.

        All this is nonsense. The superiority in the number of tanks and airplanes plays a real role only in some inter-Dapuasian turmoil.
        Now the economies of almost all the more or less developed countries are tightly tied to the United States (represented by the Fed) and dance to their tune. This is real superiority. In such circumstances, trying to scare amers with airplanes in the Crimea is simply ridiculous: they will not fight a serious enemy, they will simply ruin it and let it go around the world. Well, some last may be organized Maidan. Afterwards, you can bomb and, if it does, the benefit of giving a worthy rebuff will already be especially nobody.
    3. +4
      17 September 2015 15: 02
      Quote: MIKHAN
      He noted that "the Russians have one of the best air defense systems on the planet."

      Taught by experience .... Well and further down the list ....! hi


      The USSR had the best air defense system on the planet, and Russia inherited it
      And yet there is no continuous ERLS coverage in our country, so when it will be possible then we can rejoice

      Russian air defense is at a high level, but only the central industrial region in Ufa was protected when powerful air defense once stood, positions for s200 s75 s125 of the three sides were missile defense regiments, and now the air defense brigade with beeches
      1. +10
        17 September 2015 15: 19
        Continuous air defense coverage of 1/7 of the Earth’s land? We would close the borders and inhabited areas with the largest industrial centers.
        1. +3
          17 September 2015 18: 29
          Quote: marlin1203
          Continuous air defense coverage of 1/7 of the Earth’s land?


          A continuous radar field existed over the USSR and the VD countries, i.e. ALL airspace was controlled, at least at medium and high altitudes. At the same time, of course, means of destruction of air targets (SAM and IA) covered the borders of states and important military and industrial facilities.
          In the late 80s, they decided to abandon the continuous radar field and complete control of the air situation. Now the air defense system is just fragmentary.
  2. +4
    17 September 2015 14: 52
    Are such statements justified - or are they just attempts to knock money out of the budget?
    One follows from the second ...
  3. +6
    17 September 2015 14: 55
    “The United States has been operating fifth-generation aircraft for many years, we are only testing them.

    and what is their fifth generation = our fifth generation? ...
    1. +2
      17 September 2015 15: 01
      Quote: _my opinion
      “The United States has been operating fifth-generation aircraft for many years, we are only testing them.

      and what is their fifth generation = our fifth generation? ...


      knee-deep ... a truncated version ...
    2. +1
      17 September 2015 16: 29
      Quote: _my opinion
      and what is their fifth generation = our fifth generation? ...

      It’s foolish to underestimate ... If we take the life of a person as a timeline, then their F-22 teenager, albeit with sores, and our T-50 infant, and he still did not really get out ...
      1. 0
        17 September 2015 19: 46
        It is not entirely correct to compare the Air Force apart from the air defense. If the F-22 is a teenager, and the T-50 is an infant, then the Patriot is an embryo, and the S-300 is a sexually mature man!
        1. 0
          18 September 2015 00: 52
          Compare two aircraft ... What does the air defense? When do you compare two tanks, do you ignore the railway troops?
    3. +4
      17 September 2015 17: 31
      Quote: _my opinion
      and what is their fifth generation = our fifth generation? ..


      And what do we have somewhere already in service .. "our fifth generation"? belay
  4. 0
    17 September 2015 14: 55
    About the anti-missile base in Romania and the fact that the Tu-22M3 are capable of striking without entering the air defense coverage area. They are not fools in NATO; they can significantly strengthen the defense of the base with the help of Patriot, THAAD and fighter aircraft air defense systems. As for THAAD, it seems to me that this complex was specifically designed to intercept Iskander-M type OTRKs (despite the fact that when the THAAD began to be developed, Iskander-M was not yet).
    1. +4
      17 September 2015 15: 01
      when they started to develop THAAD Iskander-M was not yet). [/ quote]
      -------------------------
      How can he intercept a maneuvering missile? And could he? Here is how?
      1. +1
        17 September 2015 15: 14
        Quote: Altona
        How can he intercept a maneuvering missile? And could he? Here is how?

        Iskander-M does not maneuver throughout the flight, but only in the final section. THAAD radar detects a target at ranges up to 1000 kilometers. The firing range of the complex is 200 kilometers, the height of destruction is 150-200 kilometers. The apogee in the flight path of the Iskander-M rocket is 50 kilometers. If THAAD complexes will be deployed by defense echelons. That by launching several missiles to bring down the Iskander-M missile is quite possible.
        1. +6
          17 September 2015 15: 33
          for Lt. Air Force Stock:

          "THAAD will be deployed by defense echelons. It is quite possible to shoot down the Iskander-M missile by launching several missiles." ////

          But to test such a complex "salvo" target shooting
          impossible. As well as guarantee the result.
          Against the Iskanders, the Americans have a more reliable weapon -
          aviation with KR type JASSM. For strikes against starters, not flying
          rockets. But here, as in cowboy films, who used to shoot ... stop
    2. +11
      17 September 2015 15: 13
      "As for THAAD, it seems to me that this complex was specially created
      to intercept Iskander-M type OTRK "///

      No. THAAD was originally intended to intercept high-flying
      Medium range BR. Then its capabilities were expanded: against satellites
      and low-flying BRs of the type Point / Iskander. They shot down the satellite once during tests,
      and as far as I know, there were no tests to intercept missiles similar to Iskander.
      I doubt they can bring down Iskander.
      1. +4
        17 September 2015 15: 23
        Quote: voyaka uh
        I doubt they can bring down Iskander.

        I agree. In reality, it can work on satellites in low orbits and on missiles flying along ballistic trajectories. Iskander is neither one nor the other. request But even with regard to the former, there are great doubts about the possibility of their destruction - the range and speed of interceptor missiles can hardly provide a high probability of hitting targets. bully
      2. 0
        17 September 2015 19: 57
        The next modification of the THHAD missile defense system will have a greater range and height of target destruction and will most likely become a prototype of our C 500.
  5. 0
    17 September 2015 14: 59
    Did we have time?

    I think yes.
    But you should not relax.
  6. -1
    17 September 2015 15: 01
    Russian fist will always be stronger than merikansky)
  7. 0
    17 September 2015 15: 03
    We will not guess what and whom the Americans will strengthen. That the mattresses themselves, that their hirelings are weak in their knees and can only be mobbed by the weak ... angry
  8. 0
    17 September 2015 15: 06
    Fear American Dogs !!!!
  9. +6
    17 September 2015 15: 07
    And it’s right that they look with caution, they still don’t know about our construction battalion, and if they are told that we have troops that we don’t trust weapons at all, then they’ll just panic.
  10. -1
    17 September 2015 15: 09
    you look, pin.dosa whined that they were driven around on a karay filly. they themselves didn’t feel whined that they had panties with a hole in the back. Change more often, otherwise they give off gases from fear.
  11. -1
    17 September 2015 15: 14
    The US military is sounding the alarm over Russia's growing military capabilities
    These amerikosy can only fight under cover of helicopters, well, or at a distance. And in melee pissers.
  12. +3
    17 September 2015 15: 14
    The Americans, as always, are shouting "guard" to print another trillion green American rubles and feed the military-industrial complex.
  13. +2
    17 September 2015 15: 21
    C'mon, what about the F35 is the best in the world? What kind of anxiety will it pass through any air defense and it has no equal in the air? request but forgot helmets dear wink
  14. +1
    17 September 2015 15: 22
    Let them fear us!
  15. +2
    17 September 2015 15: 35
    let them not only fear
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 19: 51
      Too many haters, what would it be?
  16. 0
    17 September 2015 15: 55
    They will never be able to surpass Russian pilots and planes!
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 16: 48
      Quote: Lecha57
      nodgnot smoкut

      Does your keyboard runny nose?
    2. +1
      17 September 2015 18: 14
      Quote: Lecha57
      They will never be able to surpass Russian pilots and planes!

      HOORAY.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +3
    17 September 2015 16: 17
    This year, Su-24 attack aircraft and Su-27 fighters are replaced by Su-30

    Since when did Su-24 become attack aircraft?
    Learn the mat. part please!
  19. +2
    17 September 2015 16: 22
    and announced the need to equip the Air Force with new bombers. He demands to buy “as many bombers as possible, and as quickly as possible”
    Can the printing press withstand it?
  20. +11
    17 September 2015 16: 31
    By the end of the year, the Air Force and naval aviation will receive 126 new aircraft and 88 helicopters
    I look at the numbers of more than a hundred aircraft per year, no one is surprised. Quickly accustomed to good lol
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 16: 51
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      figures in more than a hundred aircraft per year no longer surprise anyone

      It's time to get up from the pose of "great respect" (to the "great overseas master"), nothing surprising, only that there would be enough money, production capacity and political will!
    2. +1
      18 September 2015 00: 09
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Quickly accustomed to good


      one hell is bad ... everything is gone .. crying
  21. +2
    17 September 2015 16: 48
    Russia is obliged to strengthen its weapons so that it cannot rattle its arms to the USA and NATO, which surrounded Russia on all sides.
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 18: 18
      Quote: StarikNV
      Russia must to strengthen its armament so that the USA and NATO, which surrounded Russia on all sides, could not rattle their weapons.

      Who obliged her, Russia? You? If required, so do it. Readiness to report!
      1. +1
        18 September 2015 00: 10
        Quote: Kos_kalinki9
        Who obliged her, Russia?


        history gracious sovereign, history .. feel
  22. +2
    17 September 2015 17: 19
    You must always be ready to defend your homeland, and not look
    a country where you can take refuge, as our liberals do.
  23. +1
    17 September 2015 18: 37
    but the situation is far from what the general described it
    Only a simple-minded or stupid person can say this about his army. Sometimes it’s just embarrassing to be for our military and officials. sculpt something without hitting. fool
  24. -1
    17 September 2015 19: 20
    Speaking to the senators in Congress, General Gorenz, shaking the crap diaper, shouted that,
    he personally “causes more anxiety”
    and demanded money for another cut. laughing
  25. 0
    17 September 2015 19: 35
    Quote: Lt. air force reserve
    As for THAAD, it seems to me that this complex was specially created to intercept Iskander-M type OTRK

    THAAD is actually adapted for high-altitude transatmospheric interception of medium-range missiles, although it can also intercept Iskander-type targets, that is, operational-tactical missiles. It was created specifically as an anti-missile, unlike all versions of the Patriot, the warhead of which turned out to be weak for destroying targets of the SCUD type and can intercept something of a shorter range, for example, Tochka
  26. +3
    17 September 2015 19: 42
    Quote: duche
    Speaking to the senators in Congress, General Gorenz, shaking the crap diaper, shouted that,


    You know, banter with diapers rolls once, second, tenth. But when diapers always become the criterion of the answer, this leads to certain thoughts.

    Personally, I liked the retelling of the American general's speech. A person, as they say in their place, adequately assesses the situation. He understands that the "Yeltsin" and "Serdyukov" phase of development of the Russian armed forces has passed.

    Well, do not write with us that the Americans are all gray in a row and always have filthy diapers - they won’t sleep at night.
    And as for the constant mention, always and everywhere, that the Americans crap, that they are shaking with fear, that they have crap diapers ....
    There is a good Russian proverb: "Whoever hurts, he talks about that" Do not find?
  27. +1
    17 September 2015 20: 15
    "And this at a time when the Russian Air Force is exactly the opposite - in 2014, it purchased the largest, record number of aircraft in the country's entire recent history."
    This fucking analyst is a general, like all their high-ranking officials. warriors love to distort facts. If the percentage of arms purchases in our country are growing, then from what base should this be counted? If we have almost zero, then they have from hundreds and thousands. They surpass us in number - don't go to Baba Vanga! The issue of quality is reliably determined only in a real military confrontation, i.e. database management. In the context of sanctions and chronic underfunding of the development and production of modern and expensive weapons, Russia will be able to compare in quantity with the Amer Armed Forces in 0 years, and then if the Americans do not produce anything else. the measures need a large number of offensive weapons due to their aggressive military doctrine of domination over the whole world. Our doctrine is purely defensive, so we can get by with fewer offensive weapons. This is our strength and they are afraid of us. warriors, therefore, require multiple superiority in technology over the enemy. Therefore, this article looks like "give the beggar for food"! hi
  28. -1
    17 September 2015 20: 29
    If Americans buy diapers, the best investment is at the expense of superiority in the airspace.
  29. +1
    17 September 2015 21: 22
    Cautiously, but objectively, their aviation is more powerful than ours.
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 22: 19
      Quote: 35lisment35
      Cautiously, but objectively, their aviation is more powerful than ours.


      not a fact ... if we consider a bunch of air defense + aviation at defense, then our quite confidently knock out the entire fleet of mattresses.
  30. 0
    17 September 2015 22: 45
    I understand, the next issue of "Military Acceptance"? smile
  31. Mih
    +1
    17 September 2015 22: 55
    He noted that "the Russians have one of the best air defense systems on the planet." drinks

    What pleases me indescribably, if you ate something wrong - develop my doubts. love
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. -1
    18 September 2015 05: 03
    How much more in the news is this outdated budget statement we going to suck? Well, let’s go, school patriots. We are afraid, ear. They would be afraid, they would stop flying in our space in the north. I would not have to drive out every day. Populism is such populism ..
  34. 0
    18 September 2015 08: 50
    Something I do not understand in the area of ​​lag? By the number of aircraft, perhaps! Let's start in order.
    1. Operation of 5th generation aircraft: there is no point in opposing the Raptor and Lighting 2 business projects, these aircraft with outdated electronics (1990) and maneuverability are not close to the T-50! The word "not inferior" is krneine overrated for their vacuum cleaners.
    2. Air defense systems: Excuse me, when does the production of the S-400 begin? Well, let it be, think so, we're better off. Comparison of the "patriot" with the S-400 does not make sense at all, so is commerce, although it seems to be confusing.
    3. Missile attack warning systems, how do you gentlemen know what they are and what they can.
    If everything was so good in the mattress army, there wouldn’t be such screams in different areas of the defense, so the guys panicked!
  35. 0
    18 September 2015 09: 45
    All the same, the thought warms me that, nevertheless, the Perimeter Or Dead Hand system is at work .... the rest is about horseradish
  36. 0
    21 September 2015 09: 11
    Quote: Prop
    All the same, the thought warms me that, nevertheless, the Perimeter Or Dead Hand system is at work .... the rest is about horseradish

    "Death hand" a term still used in the good old strategy of the 90s Dune 2)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"