Security Council of the Russian Federation: Ukraine is under the external control of Washington

24
The secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Nikolai Patrushev, said at a press conference that Ukraine had ceased to be an independent state, in fact, falling under the external control of the United States.



“Every visit to Ukraine by Victoria Nuland confirms that Ukraine is not an independent state, but is under the external control of Washington. Obviously, her trips are not connected with advice and consultations on issues of regional stability, as Western propaganda presents to us, but with direct instructions to the country's leadership on how to act, ”the RIA quoted him as saying "News".

Patrushev recalled that Nuland came to Kiev in the summer, held talks with Poroshenko, after which he submitted to the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada draft amendments to the Ukrainian Constitution, and the review was conducted in the presence of Nuland.

“Any personnel changes in the higher authorities of Ukraine also occur only after coordination with the White House. Disobedience will lead to the change of the president and government of Ukraine to the most politically fulfilling instructions of Washington politicians, ”Patrushev added.

The representative of the Security Council of the Russian Federation stressed that it is the US State Department that decides whether the Kiev authorities will adhere to the Minsk agreements.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    24 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +10
      16 September 2015 06: 27
      The Petro pepper is clear and there is "Parsley", which is controlled by the "smoked" buffoon.
    2. +5
      16 September 2015 06: 28
      Who would doubt that
    3. +3
      16 September 2015 06: 28
      What a news ... It was clear from the very first "Maidan". Slowly, little by little, the United States seized power in Ukraine. But here another question arises. And what did Russia do to prevent this? And what is he doing now? Why do we have an ambassador and his staff at all? Are they there in order to be "targets", for throwing eggs and bottles with brilliant green, or to protect the interests of the country and pursue our policy?
      1. -2
        16 September 2015 06: 35
        And Donetsk with Lugansk? Not politics at all? There FSBeshnikov a dime a dozen for example. The Plotnitsky and Zakharchenko can not step a step without a pointer from Moscow. Crimea gently squeezed, returned. Not so simple and not fast.
        1. Erg
          +2
          16 September 2015 07: 22
          You, dear, have lost a bit. Ukraine is a state, and the DNI and LC are not recognized territory (people) by the junta. This is me about external management. And what about the Crimea, it’s the AR. And do not forget that these are also people.
    4. +1
      16 September 2015 06: 32
      Yes, you sho!
      I really liked the drawing, right to the bottom!
      1. +3
        16 September 2015 08: 10
        Quote: Barboskin
        I really liked the drawing, right to the bottom!

        The very essence (judging by the figure) was already torn off to him, since only the upper part of the body remained. And Petya, he is like that - he always thinks as a part of the body that is missing in this picture. wink
    5. +4
      16 September 2015 06: 35
      I think that the management of the USA-Ruin is more like a joke: "Do you hear ... a finger? And here they are!"
    6. 0
      16 September 2015 06: 44
      Who would have thought ?! However, casting aside the irony, it should be noted that the external leadership of the Western powers (without specifying which ones) was the directly declared goal of all the presidents of Ukraine over the past 15 years.
    7. -2
      16 September 2015 06: 45
      Mr. Pushkov, did you just notice that ?!
      Already a year and a half!
    8. +2
      16 September 2015 06: 47
      Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev

      We continue to speak the truth official state level. Good trend.
    9. +2
      16 September 2015 06: 50
      Well, the fact that she, the ruin, under external control, it became clear after the zero cookies on the Maidan. And further down the road, Mishiko, Yaresko, and so on. What can I say if the former head of the SBU Nalyvaychenko is an agent of the CIA.
    10. +3
      16 September 2015 06: 52
      Six years ago I was in Ukraine, upon arrival home I told my wife that Ukraine is Russia in the early 90s. I was wrong, Ukraine today is Russia at the beginning of the 18th century. Also, all the key posts were held by foreigners.
    11. +1
      16 September 2015 07: 11
      The fact that Ukraine is under the external control of the United States was not said only by the lazy. It would be better if the Security Council worked out a unified strategy for counteracting, rather than helping, as now, the Kiev junta.
      1. +1
        16 September 2015 08: 02
        But the strategy does not need to be worked out. It was worked out in 1918. All the national property of Russia that fell into the hands of foreigners during privatization should be nationalized, the state bank should be nationalized, and all young reformers executed as enemies of the people.
    12. +3
      16 September 2015 07: 26
      What to say about Ukraine! Everything is clear here.

      But I remember the session of the UN General Assembly in 2010, at which Ahmadinejad spoke. The European delegations took turns leaving the hall "in protest" against the content of the speech. Later, according to WikiLeaks, it turned out that an instruction was sent from the State Department - which delegation should "protest" at which word of Ahmadinejad. The instruction was executed exactly.

      So now, let’s say, I don’t need to convince that Caucasians are not sovereign states.

      The USA wants to see itself as a sort of Amber, casting Reflections; but at the same time, they forget that there always exists an equivalent center of power, the Court of Chaos. laughing
    13. 0
      16 September 2015 08: 08
      Patrushev actually blamed the United States for any events in Ukraine. Surely before the autumn thaw, something global is being prepared there.
      We stock up on popcorn.
    14. 0
      16 September 2015 08: 22
      The picture speaks for the whole article)
    15. 0
      16 September 2015 08: 54
      "Democracy, presented by the USA and Europe as an example of the structure of the modern world, is the central ideological myth of the West, designed to govern their own peoples and subjugate the peoples of other civilizations, in particular, the peoples of Russia" (Quoted from: Reznikov K.Yu. Myths about democracy as a weapon against Russia // http://avkrasn.ru/article-257.html).
    16. +1
      16 September 2015 09: 11
      Quote: provincial
      democracy, presented by the USA and Europe as an example of the structure of the modern world, is a central ideological myth


      Vague doubts torment me ...

      I recall the canonical signs of fascism:
      Militarism;
      Aggressive wars;
      Anti-communism;
      Social populism;
      Racism;
      Theory of Excellence (USA - the exclusive, God's chosen nation - who said that?)

      All that is lacking is leaderism, but there are already considerable efforts being made to introduce a two-family system (Clintons-Bushes); so everything is still to come.

      I just can't find any "democracy" in the USA. I do not consider gay marriage and juvenile justice to be signs of democracy. Animal rights too.
    17. +2
      16 September 2015 09: 13
      Only deafblind people do not possess this information in Russia.
      Tell us in detail and reasonedly for those whom the Jews on the outskirts poke around - the inhabitants of the territory of the outskirts!
    18. 0
      16 September 2015 10: 16
      Obviously, her trips are not related to advice and consultations on regional stability issues.

      And where is her man looking. Outcast to Potroshenko. Love?

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"