Military Review

Pyongyang: Improving the DPRK Nuclear Shield Helps Counteract US Recklessness

39
DPRK leadership announced that it will improve its nuclear program. North Korea Central Telegraph Agency publishes data that the nuclear facility in North Korean Yongbyon "earned at full capacity". A few days earlier, the same information resource circulated a statement by the DPRK authorities, which said that efforts are being made to improve the country's nuclear potential.


At the same time, the DPRK notes that improving the nuclear potential of the DPRK does not at all produce aggression against any state, but for the defense of statehood. TsTAK cites a statement by the authorities, which says that in the modern world there is a major aggressor - and this is the United States of America, which often try to wreak havoc with strange hands in different regions of the planet.

CTAC:
The existing world is possible only because there is a balance of nuclear potentials, and this to some extent stops the United States. Our funds will help to cope with the possible US aggression against our state.


Pyongyang: Improving the DPRK Nuclear Shield Helps Counteract US Recklessness


The North Korean Telegraph Agency calls the US hostile policy a dangerous anachronism. According to the TsTAK, hundreds of North Korean scientists are working to improve the DPRK nuclear shield to "counter Washington's recklessness."
Photos used:
http://www.kcna.kp
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vend
    Vend 15 September 2015 13: 32 New
    +2
    DPRK nuclear shield improvement helps counteract US recklessness
    But rightly said
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 15 September 2015 13: 40 New
      0
      Here is Kim Jin-un's face of a real troll and the statements are the same laughing
      1. Maj.
        Maj. 15 September 2015 23: 27 New
        -2
        You are a foolish citizen, you are like three in your remarks. Young Koreans speak correctly and do. A proud little country confronts MONSTER incarnation of evil.
    2. strannik1985
      strannik1985 15 September 2015 14: 48 New
      +2
      This is only partially true. A small (8-10) number of nuclear charges without US delivery vehicles does not threaten, on the contrary, the USA / RK have a formally legitimate reason to increase their military presence in the region.
      If we turn to history, we can clearly see that without the efforts of the USA / RK to escalate the conflict, the DPRK would have no nuclear program. The main curse and guarantor of the DPRK's inviolability (for now) is China, precisely for the confrontation between the PRC and the Russian Federation, the situation is escalating and it is precisely because of the unequivocal position of the Beijing / Kremlin that Pyongyang has not yet touched.
  2. dr.star75
    dr.star75 15 September 2015 13: 32 New
    +4
    "The existing world is possible only because there is a balance of nuclear potentials, and this to some extent stops the United States." -Who would doubt it! "The dagger is good for those who have it, and bad for those who do not have it, at the right time!" - Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya. But North Korea is holding on.
  3. Stalker.1977
    Stalker.1977 15 September 2015 13: 33 New
    +1
    Well, what can I say, this was to be expected, in recent years Washington has been increasingly greyhound and does not feel reality, it leads steeper and steeper to a global collision.
  4. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 15 September 2015 13: 34 New
    0
    Thanks to the author of this information, now I know that

    The existing world is possible only because there is a balance of nuclear potentials, and this to some extent stops the United States. Our funds will help to cope with the possible US aggression against our state.
  5. jovanni
    jovanni 15 September 2015 13: 35 New
    +1
    You can’t argue with the moon-faced comrade Kim! Quite sesheashniki move off the coils ...
  6. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 15 September 2015 13: 36 New
    +4
    For nuclear weapons it is necessary to have a strong missile defense system, otherwise you can easily become a testing ground for developing a strategy for a global disarming strike.
  7. Nord2015
    Nord2015 15 September 2015 13: 37 New
    +5
    Even nothing to add. Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye straight.
  8. kervin78
    kervin78 15 September 2015 13: 38 New
    +3
    One of the few countries that calls a spade a spade
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 15 September 2015 19: 48 New
      -3
      Quote: kervin78
      One of the few countries that calls a spade a spade

      So what's up? Suitcase, train station, Korea! And success in the Juche affair! laughing
      1. Bayonet
        Bayonet 15 September 2015 20: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: Bayonet
        Suitcase, train station, Korea! And success in the Juche affair!

        Well, what do not like, dear? Fuck you please - Praise Kim, and go there bench press? smileBecause hypocrites are golem!
        1. strannik1985
          strannik1985 15 September 2015 21: 11 New
          +1
          Regardless of the attitude to Juche’s ideas, what should be the desire to go to a country which, under all possible sanctions and at the borders of which regularly conducts (thousands of months, not counting the rest), thousands of exercises, including the development of a preventive strike?
          Which, due to these "little things" is forced to keep a huge army of peacetime and produce the main types of weapons on their own. What should be the standard of living (recall the cataclysms and hunger of the second half of the 90s) in this country (regardless of system)?
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Maj.
        Maj. 15 September 2015 23: 32 New
        -1
        You are not very smart - read the opposite.
    2. Maj.
      Maj. 15 September 2015 23: 31 New
      -1
      Even our politicians use only hints and look with caution with caution, but what will happen to us for that. The Koreans are great.
  9. yuriy55
    yuriy55 15 September 2015 13: 38 New
    +1
    Everyone knows that only the United States used nuclear weapons ... This psychology of impunity pushes them further to the policy of aggression and personal participation in the internal affairs of different countries of the world.
    The presence of nuclear weapons on any other side has the same effect as a leash on an evil dog. And improving nuclear weapons is like a muzzle ... yes
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 15 September 2015 13: 52 New
      +1
      The USA with its aggressive policies themselves is pushing the countries of our Earth to the logical conclusion that without nuclear weapons and their carriers capable of reaching the territory of the United States or its military bases, it is simply impossible to survive in the present conditions by pursuing an independent policy.
      1. k174oun7
        k174oun7 15 September 2015 19: 33 New
        0
        5 points with a + female commentator!
  10. vovan50
    vovan50 15 September 2015 13: 39 New
    -1
    A little off topic, but I advise everyone who has not read to read S. Glazyev’s article on monetary policy. Very interesting and intelligible.
    http://www.glazev.ru/upload/iblock/129/1299749d3f0be1fe108d80969d6e718f.pdf
  11. glotich
    glotich 15 September 2015 13: 40 New
    0
    hundreds of North Korean scientists are working to improve the DPRK’s nuclear shield to "counter Washington's recklessness."

    And what, it is precisely said, the states can only climb those who are weaker, but here they will think.
  12. roskot
    roskot 15 September 2015 13: 40 New
    +1
    North Korea does not bend under the United States. Does his job in spite of enemies.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 15 September 2015 14: 32 New
      +2
      Yes, she does not bend under anyone. A friend was in Wonsan when the Koreans dragged this scout there. So all the ships and ships that were unloaded or not unloaded in the port were simply driven out of the port. And then I had to withdraw the entire Pacific Fleet in order to put between Korea and the US Navy. In "gratitude" the Koreans did not share any information, nor even gave to see this ship. And so far everything is covered in darkness that happened there.
  13. Babai. Alex
    Babai. Alex 15 September 2015 13: 43 New
    +1
    Damn, why is he constantly laughing? Maybe, too, something from hemp was muddied. No, well done, of course! But constantly ...
  14. atamankko
    atamankko 15 September 2015 13: 44 New
    0
    “Exceptional” seems to become “exceptionally sick.”
  15. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 15 September 2015 14: 00 New
    +1
    What are they all skinny. Fat is only one. Symbolically.
  16. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 15 September 2015 14: 04 New
    -1
    Involuntarily, you begin to reflect on the topic of whether the bomb is the only the guarantor of lasting peace?

    There - in the DPRK - well, there is no democracy; just like in Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Pakistan and other followers of the "cave" times (such as when the United States was not); and Comrade Eun some kind of vile socialism has been tricked (and he periodically resembles Sotoninsky Stalin) - but something is not expected of any democratizers.

    Comrade Eun spits right in the black impudent face - and the opponent only wipes himself. What is it for?
  17. pvv113
    pvv113 15 September 2015 14: 43 New
    +1
    in the modern world there is a main aggressor - and this is the United States of America, which often try to wreak havoc on other regions of the planet

    I completely agree with the North Korean comrades. And the wave of refugees in Europe is the result of the booming states in the Middle East. Only stupid Europe does not want to understand this
  18. sv68
    sv68 15 September 2015 15: 01 New
    0
    It's just that the Yankees, like the South Koreans themselves, are stubbornly pushing the North Koreans to create a powerful nuclear shield with their stupid foreign policy, not wanting to realize that it was the Yankees and Southerners who created the stalemate and stubbornly do not want to find a way out of it.
  19. strannik1985
    strannik1985 15 September 2015 16: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Gormengast
    Involuntarily, you begin to reflect on the topic of whether the bomb is the only the guarantor of lasting peace?

    Not quite so, the guarantor of peace is the infliction of unacceptable damage to the enemy so that a hot war is in no way a way out. For example, according to Soviet estimates, 280 nuclear warheads (in total or only MLNF) were necessary to inflict such damage, Pyongyang did not have such indicators in terms of quantity and quality never reach.
    Unfortunately, the opponent is not wiping out, and over the course of more than 20 years, together with the Republic of Kazakhstan, it has been gradually increasing its military capabilities in the region, in particular, in the next 5 years, only the Republic of Kazakhstan is going to spend $ 211 billion on military needs, that is, 40-42 billion . Annually, the DPRK’s position in this respect does not bother the USA / RK, on ​​the contrary, they have driven their opponents into the framework of the "crazy dictator" (and many believe!).
  20. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 15 September 2015 17: 45 New
    0
    Nuclear weapons are the only thing that keeps the SGA from attacking the DPRK.
    They will not climb where they can give them a nose. laughing
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 15 September 2015 19: 57 New
      0
      Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
      They will not climb where they can give them a nose.

      Well, tell me, how can a fat Kim give the USA a nose? Yes, if the Americans wanted, they would have turned this hamster and its goblet into dust for a long time! And China would have kept silent, because it had grown wiser after Mao. China already bought half of the USA, their money works there and makes a profit! smile
      1. Hello
        Hello 15 September 2015 20: 02 New
        +1
        Quote: Bayonet
        Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
        They will not climb where they can give them a nose.

        Well, tell me, how can a fat Kim give the USA a nose? Yes, if the Americans wanted, they would have turned this hamster and its goblet into dust for a long time! And China would have kept silent, because it had grown wiser after Mao. China already bought half of the USA, their money works there and makes a profit! smile

        No one I think will touch North Korea. This is a great scarecrow for South Korea and Japan.
        And a great reason for the Americans to keep troops in the Far East
      2. strannik1985
        strannik1985 15 September 2015 21: 14 New
        -1
        [quote = Bayonet] [quote = ALEA IACTA EST] And China would have kept silent, because it had grown wiser after Mao. China already bought half of the USA, their money works there and makes a profit! smile[/ Quote]
        Will China keep silent when creating a regional superpower at its borders, moreover pro-American? Unscientific fiction in the next section.
  21. Old26
    Old26 15 September 2015 18: 21 New
    +1
    Quote: strannik1985
    Not really, the guarantor of the world - causing the enemy unacceptable damage,

    That's right. This and only that. You can have 100 nuclear bombs and no delivery vehicles, so what?

    Quote: ALEA IACTA EST
    Nuclear weapons are the only thing that keeps the SGA from attacking the DPRK. They will not go where they can give them a nose.

    Do you really think that a few nuclear warheads (it is not known whether it is transportable or not) can deter an attack? Do not you think that no one is attacking the DPRK, since nobody needs it?
  22. APASUS
    APASUS 15 September 2015 19: 53 New
    0
    In the wake of such news from around the world, you begin to understand the desire of Koreans to have a nuclear bomb. It’s just that Americans are not ready to understand otherwise.
  23. Gormenghast
    Gormenghast 15 September 2015 21: 19 New
    -1
    Quote: strannik1985
    Pyongyang will never achieve such indicators in terms of quantity and quality.


    such indicators are not needed for Eun. Naturally, he poses no threat to the United States. But for South Korea and Japan - how else. And these are friends of the USA.

    If you read Eun’s speeches heavily, you sometimes get the feeling that he doesn’t need delivery vehicles either — it will explode next to the demarcation line, or even on its territory — if there is an invasion.

    As for the United States, it seems to me that now they are no longer afraid of unacceptable damage, but in general of any damage (except the most minimal). They like to fight at a distance - to bomb those who have neither air defense nor missile defense; launch Abrams against the T-55 and so on.
    1. strannik1985
      strannik1985 15 September 2015 21: 33 New
      +1
      What threat does Pyongyang pose to Kazakhstan or Japan? There is no information on the means of delivery of nuclear warheads at all, an explosion on its territory makes sense only in the case of defense and then only as a gesture of despair.
      By the way, South Korea is under the protection of the American strategic nuclear forces, who still need to figure out who is threatened.
  24. Old26
    Old26 15 September 2015 23: 52 New
    +2
    Quote: strannik1985
    What threat does Pyongyang pose to Kazakhstan or Japan? There is no information on the means of delivery of nuclear warheads at all, an explosion on its territory makes sense only in the case of defense and then only as a gesture of despair.

    Well, they have a lot of delivery vehicles. The question is how transportable the warheads created by the North Koreans are and their power.

    And the RK, in principle, will receive to the fullest if the DPRK strikes first. For there is practically no way to intercept missiles at such a short distance. At least they will not intercept most. With Japan, things are better there and the anti-aircraft missile defense system will manage to react. But if, with such a blow, Eun uses nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, the existence of a country with the name DPRK can be forgotten
    1. strannik1985
      strannik1985 16 September 2015 07: 14 New
      0
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: strannik1985

      Well, they have a lot of delivery vehicles. The question is how transportable the warheads created by the North Koreans are and their power.

      This is exactly what he said, there are no facts of testing missiles with nuclear warheads.
      The fact of the matter is that KPA can only do some damage if it starts first (which is suicide for North Korea) and the start is sudden for the enemy.