Writer M.I. Weller published an article about the problem of migrants in Europe. The article is widely sold out. Its full text is available, for example, here. If you are interested in how it relates to the main problem of our country - let's talk about it.
What is important: the treatise of the writer Weller as a version of the world around him is directly derived from the modern Russian ideology. Not official (we don’t have one), but official - that is, the one that Russian pop analysts and TV commentators collectively thought up in recent years, focusing on the words of the authorities about traditional values, spiritual braces, etc.
A summary of the writer's version:
1. We are with Europe - a single cultural and ideological space. Migrants - ARMY OF INVASION. Her avant-garde. They're not going to digest - not at all! - they are going to digest Europe.
2. The origins of the current problems are in the counterculture that conquered Europe. In 1950, beatniks - a bunch of homosexuals and drug addicts with asocial attitudes and creative inclinations - formulated the ethic and aesthetics of counterculture. Then, in 1960, hippies cannonized the counterculture, in 1970, blacks were equated with whites, then works were published on the need for a strong, working part of society to sponsor a weak and non-working part. Then it resulted in a statement at the expense of the majority of all minorities, ranging from sexual to religious. As a result, the leftists and perverts undermined the family institution, feminists introduced feminine individualism, fertility fell, and from the former colonies, where "200 years ago, savages ate each other and sold slaves to white", they began to accept and arrange at their own expense migrants.
3. At the same time, Africans and Arabs are, firstly, more stupid than white Europeans, and secondly, they do not identify themselves with the nations of the European states in which they live. They consider themselves "first Muslims, then Pakistanis, and only then British citizens." As a result, another ten to fifteen years - and the Islamic majority will create Sharia zones in Europe. But European politicians with a mixture of stupidity and hypocrisy do not want to admit that the problem is precisely in a strange and aggressive identity.
4. Europe forces its people, in every possible way suppressing their instinct of self-preservation, where it still exists, to be replaced by migrants, and this is all only the reification of the call of death, the craving for self-destruction. We love and appreciate not the current impotent European freaks - but their great ancestors who created the most beautiful, powerful, and majestic civilization in stories humanity.
... To this text I would like to make some comments.
The first. The tendency of minorities to live off of the labor of the majority is certainly bad. But generally, in the Majestic European Civilization, the existence of a minority through the use of the labor of the majority is an old and sacred tradition. .
In a situation where 1% of the world's population owns half the wealth of the world, and 85 of the richest billionaires have capital equal to the total capital of 3,6 billion of the poorest people in the world, it is somehow strange to pretend that the parasitism on the labor majority was invented by hippies and left professorship Xnumx's.
It should be noted, by the way, that a significant part of the representatives of the “golden interest” is the hereditary owners of the “pass in opportunity”. A third of Forbes’s “big list” for the previous year was inherited by trillions, and Bill Gates’s declared “self-made man out of the garage” is actually the grandson of the US senator and the son of a hereditary banker who provided him all the years of creative research. There are very few real self-made men among the owners of the planet.
The second. This “golden percentage” is a slightly more powerful force than beatniks. And so it happened that the spread of individualism and the cult of consumption resulted in huge incomes for this minority.
It’s not the Beats who dragged humanity into the credit races, which resulted in savings on children. It was not the left professorship that brought production from western countries to cheaper states, multiplying unemployment at home. Not feminists planted laid-off laborers of Britain 1980-x on benefits, so as not to buzz. Not the blues staged a “mortgage boom” in the US, which became the formal cause of the 2008 crisis. These are very rich people who make money and save money - although to legitimize all these processes, from time to time, some painted parrots screaming about liberation of sexuality or about minority rights.
The third and last. “The problem of alien and aggressive identity” is only a derivative of the aggressive will to profit observed in the “golden percentage” of earthlings.
Every uv. the reader can choose which of the schemes of the current crisis looks more convincing:
a) beatniks, students and left professorship corrupted the society of white Europeans, destroyed families, tried to arrange democracy among savages, and as a result, brought the dark *** away - all in a rush of “the will to death”;
b) the worldwide hereditary caste of magnates, in the banal pursuit of profit, has whitewashed the white Europeans an individualistic-consumer model of life, having squeezed a human resource for several decades of exploitation. Then, in the pursuit of profit, they destroyed a number of states of the East and the South, and now, in pursuit of profit, it carries out a partial replacement of the population in the Old World. At the same time, blue activists, left professors, beatniks and feminists - for a caste of magnates the same “instrument of profit” as the fascists in 1930, and in 1950, baby boom (the first credit fever, by the way, broke out in the Western world it is on his wave). It is worth noting that the ruling castes are dealt with quickly and decisively with ideas that threaten profit-making. Recall the “witch hunt” in the US, Operation Condor in Latin America and the violent post-war decommunization of Italy and France.
In other words, the whole question is who, after all, is destroying our world. Lazy people demanding benefits or magnates who replaced these benefits with real involvement of citizens in development and management (in an amazing way, the so-called “era of the struggle for civil rights” in all developed countries of the world is accompanied by deepening social passivity of citizens. From Europe to America and Russia everything fewer people belong to trade unions, less and less involved in political parties and movements).
... I'm all for what, dear readers. You can, of course, blame the ongoing catastrophe of a magnificent civilization on a kind of mystical "craving for death and self-destruction."
But this is a substitution of the basis by the superstructure, and the causes by the consequences. All this "self-destruction" appeared in the world only because at some stage a childless lone citizen began to do less and consume more than a person from the traditional "cell of society". As a market unit, it turned out to be more successful and profitable - and therefore became the dominant representative of advanced societies.
Now all the main benefits of a lonely city dweller have already been extracted, and he himself has aged on average and is beginning to cost a lot. At the same time, it is loaded with such overwhelming self-esteem and with such a list of benefits that are necessary for it, that it is easier for holders of the market to bring in new units than to forge existing ones.
The myth that “those who come in large numbers from Afghanistan and Syria cannot be made to work” is, of course, interesting, but this is just folklore. In Saudi Arabia, it is customary to tell jokes about lazy Pakistanis, and in the US about sleepy mexico dogs. But they both injected into local labor markets. By the way, those wishing Muscovites can look at any building site, at any supermarket, and even at any dairy plant - and see if they haven't worked there. Although in the USSR, Central Asians are also not known for their work ethic. So that these, if anything, make. And to bring the "golden interest" income, acquiring (at the expense of the state treasury, so what?) He has food-housing-iPhones, they have already begun.
And yes. The “golden percentage” itself is not going to die out and self-destruct. On the contrary, in the present years of catastrophes, he annually increases his prosperity. Here is what the organ of the rich and happy Forbes writes to us: “In total, 2014 people in the 1645 rating came in with a fortune of $ 1 billion. Their total wealth is $ 6,4 trillion — $ 1 trillion more than a year earlier.”
And finally - about our problems. We, dear readers, few have heard of beatniks and do not marry blue. But treating a person as a market resource is about the same as in advanced Western societies. This means that the same consumerism and the same individualism are imposed on this person by the same “market mechanisms” and in the name of the same “economic growth”. By the way, spirituality and patriotism in this logic are also “market mechanisms”.
And if the domestic official thought will continue to pathetically expose immorality, silently, from where morality grows; if our ideology does not return people from the status of a “market resource” to the status of the main value, which must be developed and multiplied, forming and involving in solving new and large-scale tasks -
- then we get the same thing as the "impotent European freaks." Maybe years on 10 later.