New information about the main tank T-14 "Armata"

96
The Armat’s unified heavy tracked platform project is one of the most interesting topics of recent years. Until recently, specialists and the interested public could only discuss fragmentary data published in various sources. However, a few months ago, the situation changed. A few weeks before the 9 Victory Parade in May, the first photos and videos appeared that featured a promising technique. Then the parade itself took place, and after that the defense industry continued to slowly publish information about the new project.

Last week, the TV channel "Star" made a huge gift to all lovers of military equipment. The first full-fledged TV program devoted to the promising line of military equipment was broadcast. In the new edition of the Military Acceptance program called Armata-Terra Incognita, representatives of the defense industry and journalists told about the new project and revealed some new information that was previously unavailable to the general public.

Unfortunately, most of the information about the project of the Armata platform and armored vehicles based on it remains under secrecy. Nevertheless, already declassified information admitted for publication is of great interest and can seriously complement the existing picture drawn up from previously published data. Thus, even under the conditions of secrecy, the Zvezda channel managed to make an extremely interesting program with which all professionals and amateurs of technology should familiarize themselves.


Tank T-14 "Armata". Photo of Wikimedia Commons


Before studying the new information, let us recall what data about the Armat project has already become public knowledge. The first mentions of the new project created by the Uralvagonzavod corporation appeared several years ago. Shortly thereafter, it became known that in the framework of the new project it is planned to create a unified heavy tracked platform, on the basis of which various types of military equipment will be developed. So, it was supposed to create and launch a main tank, a heavy infantry fighting vehicle, an armored repair and recovery vehicle and equipment of other classes into the series.

The public’s greatest interest was in the main combat project. tank based on the Armata platform, designated T-14. According to the developers of the project, this machine was supposed to have a number of promising features that had not yet found application in tanks. Using these new ideas, it was planned to significantly increase the level of protection of the crew, the firepower of weapons, mobility and, as a result, the overall combat effectiveness of the tank.

The well-known general layout of a tank based on the Armata platform became quite a long time ago. In order to improve the protection of the crew, it was decided to transfer the workplaces of all tankers to a common armored capsule placed inside the hull. Behind the crew capsule, therefore, there should be an uninhabited fighting compartment. The engine compartment, as in previous domestic tanks, remained in the stern. Rumors were circulating about the possible transfer of the engine and transmission to the front of the hull, but they were eventually refuted by official data.

Almost all the characteristics of the new T-14 tank remain a secret. However, the approximate values ​​of some parameters have now become known. So, in different sources it was claimed that the armored vehicle will receive an engine with a capacity of more than 1500 hp. In addition, information was announced on the superiority of the new tank guns over existing weapons. However, other characteristics, even the most common, have not yet been announced.


The power unit of the platform "Armata". Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


In their program, journalists from the Zvezda TV channel, with the permission of the military and defense industry, revealed some interesting features of the T-14 project. Without going into secret details, the authors of the program “Military Acceptance” told and showed many interesting things that complement or correct the already existing picture.

For example, the installation process of the power unit was shown. For the first time in domestic practice, a tracked armored vehicle received an engine and transmission, made in the form of a single unit. This feature of the power plant facilitates the assembly of machinery or repairs in the conditions of army workshops. Due to this know-how, the replacement of a power unit takes no more than a few hours, which should accordingly affect the rate of maintenance of equipment.

The main characteristics of the power plant has not yet been announced. Nevertheless, it was announced that the Armata platform was equipped with a multi-fuel X-shaped engine, superior in power to all existing domestic tank engines. This means that its power is at least 1500 hp. The available power makes it possible to compensate for the increase in the mass of equipment in comparison with previous machines and, as a result, to provide the possibility of overcoming all the obstacles introduced in the customer's technical task.

To improve the mobility characteristics, the T-14 tank and other vehicles based on the Armata platform receive an automatic reverse gearbox. This unit has 8 speeds forward and 8 rear. Thus, thanks to the new gearbox, the armored car can move forward or in reverse with the same speed indicators. In some situations, this possibility can significantly improve the efficiency of the machine, as well as ensure its survival in battle.


Assembling the undercarriage chassis, visible some features of the suspension. Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


The unified platform “Armata” gets a tracked undercarriage with an individual suspension of seven track rollers on each side. The type of suspension has not yet been clarified, but the features shown in the car clearly hint at the use of torsions. In addition, the two front and rear pairs of road wheels are equipped with additional shock absorbers, apparently designed to compensate for some increased loads.

Also, the chassis of the T-14 has an uneven distribution of support rollers. It is easy to see that the distance between the first three pairs of rollers is greater than between the others. The rest of the chassis of the new tank is almost not different from the "classic" units of domestic tanks: front guides and rear drive wheels with pinching gear, as well as several support rollers.

The main characteristics of mobility are not yet subject to disclosure. Nevertheless, the authors of the program mentioned one curious fact that can help determine the approximate range of maximum speeds of the new technology. During the Victory Parade technique, passing on Red Square, goes to Vasilyevsky descent. In order to withstand operation, vehicles entering a corner with a large radius have to increase the speed, often to 100 km / h. The authors of the “Military Acceptance” remind that the drivers of the T-14 tanks during the parade did an excellent job with the task and kept the line on the turn.

In order to increase the level of protection of the crew and the entire machine as a whole, the main tank T-14 receives a set of special equipment that protects it from various threats. In this case, protection is provided in different ways and at different stages: both when preparing the enemy for a shot, and at the moment of hitting the projectile.


Computer simulation of the movement of the tank on rough terrain. Seen some features of the chassis. Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


The first "boundary" of the protection of a promising tank are special materials and paint. It is alleged that due to their use, it was possible to drastically reduce the visibility of the combat vehicle for radar detection devices. Thus, the first way to increase the survivability of a tank on the battlefield is to reduce the likelihood of its detection by the enemy.

If it was not possible to avoid detection and the enemy is trying to put weapons in, an optoelectronic suppression system comes into play. When radiation is detected by an enemy laser rangefinder, special grenades are shot, forming a cloud of smoke with metal particles. A tank or other enemy combat vehicle will not be able to measure the distance to the target and, as a result, it will correct its weapons. In addition, grenade launchers can be used when an adversary uses weapons with a homing target.

The third means of protection is a complex of electronic warfare. A set of special electronic equipment must create around the tank an area protected from various enemy weapons. Such systems must protect T-14 from guided missiles and anti-tank mines with magnetic fuses. The principle of operation for the disruption of attacks using missiles has not yet been clarified.

Only having overcome the first three degrees of protection, the enemy’s ammunition will be able to hit the armor of a new domestic tank. However, in this case, the defeat of the machine is not guaranteed. The T-14 tank and other vehicles based on the Armata platform are equipped with a set of protective equipment in the form of their own armor and additional modules mounted on it. The composition and characteristics of the hull armor remain secret, but it can be assumed that, at a minimum, the frontal part of the hull is equipped with a combined multi-layer barrier. The side protection is obviously less complex and durable.


Tank T-14 during test shooting. Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


To improve the characteristics of the tank is proposed to equip the blocks of dynamic protection. Such blocks cover the entire upper frontal part and side screens. Thus, the tank is protected from shelling from the entire front hemisphere not only by armor, but also by dynamic protection. The stern of the sides, in turn, is covered with lattice cutting screens. Such equipment allows you to protect the machine from various anti-tank ammunition, and does not impair the cooling of the aft hull and power plant.

A curious feature of the so-called. active means of protection of the new tank is their complete autonomy. Automation should independently monitor the environment and take the necessary measures. For example, her duties include working with laser radiation sensors and smoke grenade launchers. When radiation from a laser range finder is detected, the electronics should independently determine the location of its source and form an impenetrable cloud in the beam path. In fact, the crew’s only task when using active defenses is to activate them when entering the battlefield. Everything else they do on their own, allowing tankers to concentrate on the implementation of the combat mission.

One of the main tasks of the project was to ensure the maximum possible protection of the crew. That is why it was decided to abandon the traditional accommodation of the crew in the department of management and the tower, moving to a new layout. The entire crew of the T-14 tank, consisting of three people, is located in the total volume, made in the form of a so-called. armored capsules, thereby providing additional protection.

The crew capsule is located behind the upper frontal part and in front of the fighting compartment. Three tankers sit shoulder to shoulder and have all the necessary equipment to control the machine. On the left seat is a mechanic driver, on average - the gunner-operator of weapons, on the right - the commander. Access to the capsule is provided by two hatches in the roof, located above the driver and commander. The gunner must enter the tank through one of the "alien" hatches. All crew members at the same time have their own periscopic instruments to monitor the situation. The host of the Military Acceptance program, Alexey Egorov, noted the heavy weight of the hatches. Interestingly, was this a random comment or a kind of reference to recent disputes over the thickness and level of protection of the hatches?


The interior of the crew capsule. Visible jobs driver (in the background) and the gunner (in front). Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


To reduce the size of the cabin and provide additional convenience of combat work, tankers' seats are installed with a backward tilt. In this case, the driver's seat can be raised, allowing him to look over the frontal part.

The driver's workplace is equipped with a steering wheel, adjustable in two planes for greater convenience of work. There are also a gearbox control lever, a set of screens and other devices for displaying information about the operation of various systems. Through the use of an automatic transmission, the driver works with only two pedals.

In front of the gunner and commander there are control panels with two LCD monitors on each. With the help of this equipment, the crew receives the video signal from the means of observation and can make the detection of targets with their subsequent attack. The control of armament is carried out with the help of two consoles, similar to those used on modern domestic tanks. Guidance weapons performed by turning the remote or tilting its side levers. If necessary, these consoles, apparently, can turn and fit under the dashboard.

The fire control system and associated equipment allows the crew to observe and search for targets at any time of the day and determine targets at distances up to several kilometers. Optical-electronic sighting equipment has the ability to zoom in over a wide range, making it easier to shoot at remote targets. Also as part of the OMS, an automatic target tracking system is provided that is capable of solving assigned tasks both day and night.


Jobs gunner (foreground) and commander (behind). Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


The armament of the prospective domestic T-14 tank is installed in the turret. Due to the transfer of the crew into a single volume, an uninhabited fighting compartment was developed with a set of automation fully servicing the main gun. All operations for the preparation for the shooting are carried out without human participation, only on his commands.

Like the previous tanks of domestic development, T-14 is equipped with a smooth-bore gun caliber 125 mm. However, this gun (according to available data, denoted as 2А82) is made according to modern technologies with the use of new materials. This allowed to increase the maximum pressure in the bore, which led to the growth of some other characteristics. However, accurate data on the latest tank weapons have not yet been published.

Andrei Terlikov, chief designer of the Ural design bureau of transport engineering, notes that the modular design of the tank allows further use of larger-caliber weapons, as well as other upgrades of the fighting compartment. Thus, the talk about the possible installation of a new instrument of increased caliber has certain grounds.

As an additional weapon, a new tank based on the Armata platform uses a combat module with a machine gun. This system is installed on the roof of the tower and allows you to protect the tank from attack from any angle. The module has a remote control system and is fully controlled by the crew.


Preparing to shoot from the main gun. Frame from m / n "Military acceptance"


Already, the corporation "Uralvagonzavod" and the organizations included in its composition, have some thoughts about the further modernization of the new tank. In particular, the question of creating an unmanaged modification controlled from a remote control is being considered. For this, a number of research and design works should be carried out, which will take some time.

Most of the information about the Armat’s unified tracked platform project and the T-14 tank is not yet disclosed. Developers are still not in a hurry to disclose the details of new projects, which contributes to the emergence of various versions and conjectures, as well as fuel interest from the public. The recent program of the TV channel "Star" was able to answer some long-standing questions. In addition, thanks to her, there were new questions about the project, the answers to which will not appear soon. Therefore, you should wait news on the progress of the project and new reports on certain features of promising technology.
The program "Military Acceptance", the issue of "Armata -" terra incognita "
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    15 September 2015 06: 10
    "... to help determine the approximate range of maximum speeds of new equipment. During the Victory Parade, the equipment, passing through Red Square, goes to Vasilyevsky Spusk. To maintain the formation, vehicles entering a turn with a large radius have to increase their speed, often up to 100 km / h . The authors of "Military acceptance" remind that the drivers of the T-14 tanks during the parade did an excellent job and kept the formation on the turn. ... "

    Wow, up to 100 km.h ?? Isn't that a typo?
    If it's true, then it's just some kind of fantasy !!
    1. +20
      15 September 2015 10: 13
      Quote: NOMADE
      "... to help determine the approximate range of maximum speeds of new equipment. During the Victory Parade, the equipment, passing through Red Square, goes to Vasilyevsky Spusk. To maintain the formation, vehicles entering a turn with a large radius have to increase their speed, often up to 100 km / h . The authors of "Military acceptance" remind that the drivers of the T-14 tanks during the parade did an excellent job and kept the formation on the turn. ... "

      Wow, up to 100 km.h ?? Isn't that a typo?
      If it's true, then it's just some kind of fantasy !!

      Well, when will they begin to be friends with their heads? Caterpillars, on the descent, on the paving stones in a turn of 90 degrees at 100 km / h ??? fool A tank on a crossroads after 60 is practically uncontrollable, and even more so on asphalt and paving stones. The recent somersault "a la ears" of the T-72 at biathlon does not mean anything, and there the speed was much less than 100.
      Although purely technically reaching a speed of 100 km / h in a straight line is not a problem. hi
      1. +1
        15 September 2015 11: 09
        In addition to the above.
        1. Display of BTT 38 NIIII BTT Kubinka September 2000.
        https://yadi.sk/i/fyRpjZRdj6WaS
        2. rehearsal of the parade Vasilievsky descent
        https://youtu.be/jtsJlCsgayM
      2. +2
        15 September 2015 18: 30
        we are friends with the head) therefore, we remember that on Red Square and on the bridge roads of the city of Moscow, tanks ride not on simple tracks, but with rubber pads. Otherwise, all the streets of the capital would turn into rut tracks. rubber adheres well to asphalt in any case better than a bare caterpillar. and no one spoke about entering the turn at 100 km per hour.
        1. +1
          15 September 2015 18: 46
          Quote: mark2
          we are friends with the head) therefore, we remember that on Red Square and on the bridge roads of the city of Moscow, tanks ride not on simple tracks, but with rubber pads. Otherwise, all the streets of the capital would turn into rut tracks. rubber adheres well to asphalt in any case better than a bare caterpillar. and no one spoke about entering the turn at 100 km per hour.

          Dear, read carefully.
          equipment, passing through Red Square, goes to Vasilyevsky descent. To maintain the order, cars entering a turn with a large radius have to increase speed, often up to 100 km / h.

          We remember the rubber on the tracks from the cadet bench, but at speed, and it does not savehi
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +3
            15 September 2015 21: 06
            Interestingly, and "Poplar" also enter the turn at a hundred? wink


            To be honest, these words about "100 km \ h" seem to me a journalistic fiction, such as for effect.
            1. +1
              15 September 2015 23: 19
              Quote: The Cat
              Interestingly, and "Poplar" also enter the turn at a hundred? wink


              To be honest, these words about "100 km \ h" seem to me a journalistic fiction, such as for effect.

              So for what a conversation. But couch experts do not understand this, how did they encroach on the most sacred. hi
            2. 0
              17 September 2015 18: 57
              Well, if after a combat launch
          3. 0
            17 September 2015 18: 56
            At these speeds, she just doesn’t stay on turns
      3. 0
        17 September 2015 18: 55
        I tried on ZSU-23-4 at 35-40km per hour on concrete ----------- it is easier to play hockey barefoot on ice.
    2. +8
      15 September 2015 10: 51
      Quote: NOMADE
      If it's true, then it's just some kind of fantasy !!

      ... did not say anything about KAZ Almaty ...
      KAZ complex of active protection.
      1. +4
        15 September 2015 11: 51
        Wow, up to 100 km.h ?? Isn't that a typo?
        If it's true, then it's just some kind of fantasy !!

        So, should this apply to any technique in the parade? T-90, Coalition, Poplars? and so on, so on ... what
    3. +3
      15 September 2015 12: 06
      Regarding 100 km / h, I doubt something, well, the record for the T-80U (46 tons, 1250hp) was showing a speed exceeding 100 km / h on it. That the engine is 1500 hp - this is only the version, as far as the most powerful was the T-80U, then probably the power can be 1300 hp and 1500 hp and 1800 hp. In short, wait and see.
      1. +5
        15 September 2015 14: 54
        For the first time in domestic practice, a tracked armored vehicle received an engine and transmission made in the form of a single unit.

        And in the BMP-1-2-3 engine and transmission is not a single unit made?

        Somewhere on YouTube lies a film in which the removal and installation of the Leclerc tank transmission site is demonstrated:
        a tank pulls up, followed by an engineering car. Technicians unscrew the bolts, the transmission is pulled out by the crane of the engineering machine, the machine with the transmission drives off to the side. Then it returns, the transmission is put in place, the mechanics tighten the bolts (including on the bottom of the tank), the tank starts its engine and leaves under its own power.
        15-20 minutes for all these actions, and ours write about:
        Thanks to this know-how, replacing the power unit takes no more than a few hours, which should accordingly affect the pace of maintenance of equipment.
        1. +1
          15 September 2015 18: 52
          15-20 minutes for all these actions,

          But this is definitely fantastic. hi
          1. 0
            17 September 2015 19: 00
            Read about BMP Bradley years 70-80, quite interesting
        2. +1
          16 September 2015 10: 57
          Quote: Bad_gr
          Somewhere on YouTube lies a film in which the removal and installation of the Leclerc tank transmission site is demonstrated:

          Mistaken, the tank is not Leclerc, but Leopard (a little lower, in this thread, the video was posted by the Professor)
    4. 0
      15 September 2015 12: 58
      I do not understand the author’s regret regarding the secrecy and secrecy of information on the project. Apparently, the author wants the potential enemy to learn more about the Russian tank ?!
    5. 0
      16 September 2015 09: 48
      Probably the main way to inspect the terrain by the tank commander in the troops will be through the machine gun guidance system. A high point of view, well, a shot from a machine gun in which case.
      1. 0
        16 September 2015 10: 12
        By the way, I wonder how the BMPT will look on the platform of Almaty?
    6. 0
      17 September 2015 18: 52
      Bullshit, study geometry, or at least the Stroyevoy Charter of the USSR Armed Forces, the inner column takes a SHORT step (if not OUTSIDE) so that the outer one can go normal, but never run, especially in parades.
  2. -19
    15 September 2015 06: 14
    The gunner is a suicide bomber. It’s like in an IS-2 tank, a mechanic could get out of the tank only through the hatches of the tower, i.e. after all. He did not have a chance to survive, even because of a simple smoke he could die.
    1. +11
      15 September 2015 06: 47
      Quote: oldav
      The gunner is a suicide bomber. It’s like in an IS-2 tank, a mechanic could get out of the tank only through the hatches of the tower, i.e. after all. He did not have a chance to survive, even because of a simple smoke he could die.


      Well, about getting out of the gunner’s tank - this is already an option (T-55,62, Abrams, etc. where there are also two hatches for three). And believe me, he has a chance to survive, it all depends on the skill of the crew (how they drove them to the TST).
      Another thing is more interesting - how the gunner and commander feel when the car is moving over rough terrain. In the T-64,72,80,90 tanks - they sit in a place limited on both sides, tight enough (tower and cannon guard), there is something to hold on to. In T-14, the driver holds onto the helm, and CT, BUT -? Fastened to seat belts?
      1. +1
        15 September 2015 17: 37
        Quote: bolat19640303
        and CT, BUT -? Fastened to seat belts?

        Tooting...
        A trifle, but very important!
        Although there were no special details in the material, and there couldn’t be any for reasons of secrecy, I was interested in machine guns.
        One machine gun? Large-caliber or 7,62? Stabilized, allows you to fire on the move? If there is one, large-caliber, then for the defeat of the infantry there should be an appropriate ammunition, and not three hundred rounds as before at the ZPU.
        Let us hope that all these issues are thought out and effectively resolved in the new MBT.
    2. +1
      15 September 2015 09: 50
      IS had to get out from under the guns into the fighting compartment, and the crew members were on 3.
    3. +4
      15 September 2015 16: 16
      The gunner is a suicide bomber.

      There, if the tower is unsuccessfully rotated and the cannon is lowered, then one of the hatches will be blocked ... i.e. there will be only one. But it is not necessary to leave an airtight armored capsule even in the event of a fire outside its volume and undermining the ammunition ...
      They did not indicate one of the most important parameters from the film in the article: the gun allows three consecutive shells to be put into the area of ​​the handkerchief at a distance of 3 km! Exceptional accuracy!
      Well, the most interesting test for any tank would be the time of taking the fleeing off-road SUV in the urban area with a park zone.
      1. +1
        15 September 2015 18: 20
        Tektor

        Such accuracy depends primarily on the quality of the shot. And since the Soviet stock of shots is designed for wide tolerance, there is no point in talking about such accuracy.
      2. 0
        15 September 2015 19: 05
        Quote: Tektor
        But it is not necessary to leave an airtight armored capsule even in the event of a fire outside its volume and undermining the ammunition ...

        That is unlikely...
        The armored capsule, like everything in this world, is by no means a panacea, although the thing is good.
        Too "grave" consequences in case of fire with detonation of ammunition.
        Quote: Tektor
        one of the most important parameters from the film: the gun allows you to put three shells in a row on a handkerchief at a distance of 3 km!

        This is also unlikely! laughing
        Ask not "from the movie", but the specific characteristics of the dispersion of tank guns (probable deviations). Especially at 3 km already and meteorological conditions start to have a great influence.
        A straight forward jump for smoothbore guns will also be very wonderful, if three shells fall into the dimension 3 * 1,5 m for 1,5 km.
    4. 0
      17 September 2015 19: 02
      Theoretically, in a tank they either win or do not evacuate, the rest is theory without practice
  3. +7
    15 September 2015 06: 58
    But the author of the program correctly said that this video will be revised hundreds of times by all the world intelligence! In one program there’s so much information right away! Analysts and specialists are already studying. Maybe they’ve shown it in vain?
    1. 0
      15 September 2015 18: 22
      Well, what can you look for a top-secret in control panels and extinct screens?
      1. 0
        16 September 2015 17: 17
        Quote: gladcu2
        Analysts and specialists are already studying. Maybe they showed it in vain ?!

        And I think not in vain !!!!!! Since the tank will go to the troops, amateur viscera videos are coming soon! And then I think they added a little more desuhi, especially when they showed the monitor screens with testing the tank (electronic). As with the shooting, they deliberately smeared past the center in order to calm down (and in words they announced the unprecedented accuracy of shooting and speed of movement !!!!! I think the film was made with the participation of specialists from the counterintelligence bodies !!!!!! there is a pretty interesting film on the star and about "Kurgan" !!!!! http://tvzvezda.ru/video/docfilms/content/201509071234-6667.htm/
  4. +3
    15 September 2015 07: 12
    A single engine block with transmission know-how from the early eighties. On Leopard 2, this is done. Immediately there are questions about replacing the engine on the T-72 and T-80. It seems to me that they fit in at the same time. Also curious how much the forward and reverse gear was on the T-72 and T-80? On Leopard-2, if not confusing, 6 forward and 5 back. The torsion bar suspension is also not new, but on the other hand it has proven itself well, so what's the point of changing it? About the entrance to 100km per hour. I wonder where at the rehearsal of the parade so accelerate ???
    1. +9
      15 September 2015 08: 15
      Quote: qwert
      A single engine block with transmission know-how from the early eighties. On Leopard 2, this is done. Immediately there are questions about replacing the engine on the T-72 and T-80. It seems to me that they fit in at the same time. Also curious how much the forward and reverse gear was on the T-72 and T-80? On Leopard-2, if not confusing, 6 forward and 5 back. The torsion bar suspension is also not new, but on the other hand it has proven itself well, so what's the point of changing it? About the entrance to 100km per hour. I wonder where at the rehearsal of the parade so accelerate ???


      The replacement time for the T-72 engine and the T-80 monoblock are significantly different. On the T-80 in the field, we changed the GTD-1000 TF monoblock and in 4,5 hours we were ready for movement. Of course with MTO-80. The T-72 is much longer. A few hours on the T-14, of course, too much.
      On the T-80, there are 4 forward and 1 reverse gears, while the T-72 (64) has 7 forward and 1 reverse gears. Torsion bar suspension, you're right, simple and reliable. Never had to change a broken torsion bar to a T-80 (as opposed to a short torsion bar to a T-64).
      1. +7
        15 September 2015 09: 08
        on the T-80 we fit in 4 hours in the fourth
        on T-72 day changed

        Even on BMP 2, we replaced the box and engine in 4 hours with a single unit
      2. -2
        15 September 2015 18: 28
        bolat196

        A few hours is normal. Not critical. It is possible and more. But if in 20 minutes, then the engineer can be shot. Since technologically he can be blamed for wasting production time per unit of product. Which is not justified by a given need.

        The product becomes time consuming and expensive.
  5. +7
    15 September 2015 07: 13
    "But the author of the show was right when he said that this video will be reviewed by all the intelligence services of the world hundreds of times! There is so much information in one program at once! Analysts and specialists are already studying. Maybe they showed it in vain ?! Especially the workshop and how the engine was installed ..."
    Believe me, this information from the list is "logical". What does not make sense to hide. Moreover, the car will have to go to the troops, which means that pictures from conscripts will be in the net-100%.
    Well, what’s wrong with the installation of the new engine? It is also installed on the T-72/80/90. The main thing is not how it looks, but how the chassis units, towers, FCS, etc. are arranged.
    I was pleased with the fact that finally the tank became comfortable! Straight, Europenized. It remains only to cram the coffee machine (As on the "Cheatane" MK5). And then sit around the clock and without coffee, food ..... By the way, to the toilet , a hike, you can go on the spot. The seat cushion moves away :)
    The screens pleased. A good topic. True, there are questions about the tower’s armor. If you look at the tower and its interior, it seems that the armor is small, but it may seem different.

    "The hatches are too narrow! They say our fellow countryman, deputy Zotov I.L., the leader of the party of pensioners decided to" test "" Armata "and got stuck! FIVE HOURS the poor man suffered! And the" animals "around could not help - shoot! Laughing laughing laughing

    "Someone is eating too much!" (Rabbit)"
    Yes, you wait, soon the State Duma will want to take a ride on the new product. That's where the trouble will be. The year will be decided by whom the mandate is steeper and who will be the first to get out of the BMP :)
    1. +4
      15 September 2015 10: 02
      Better is the normal and reliable information than the couch special forces, hooligan, will throw the next probable enemy with their caps) I am sure that the relevant services checked and filtered out all the transmission data a hundred times.
  6. -9
    15 September 2015 07: 22
    Why six reverse gears?
    And the handset in the stern of the T-15?

    If you do remote control, then what's the point of making a tank of this size (crew capsule is not needed).
    1. Alf
      +2
      15 September 2015 16: 13
      Quote: SarS
      Why six reverse gears?

      That would not lose time at the moment of danger on a U-turn and, accordingly, not to substitute the enemy’s board and stern for the enemy’s anti-tank equipment.
      Quote: SarS
      And the handset in the stern of the T-15?

      So that at the moment of the battle the infantryman ran to the stern, grabbed the receiver and reported to the tank commander or gunner that "ATGM for one hour", and did not run ahead, waving a machine gun and knocking on the armor.
  7. -8
    15 September 2015 07: 40
    Thanks to this know-how, replacing the power unit takes no more than a few hours, which should accordingly affect the pace of maintenance of equipment.

    "no more than a few hours"? Timing the time.

    1. +7
      15 September 2015 08: 46
      What are you showing us a little bit of nonsense? We already felt them, so-so. You would have boasted two carriages with your chariot laughing
      1. -9
        15 September 2015 10: 10
        Quote: Engineer
        What are you showing us a little bit of nonsense? We already felt them, so-so. You would have boasted two carriages with your chariot laughing

        On Merkava, replacing an engine takes even less time than on Leopard. You will not survive, a heart attack is enough. wassat
        PS
        I will tell you a secret. There are 3 crews on Merkava. lol
        1. +3
          15 September 2015 13: 04
          Quote: professor
          On Merkava, replacing an engine takes even less time than on Leopard. You will not survive, a heart attack is enough.

          Some of your compatriots claim that replacing the engine on the Merkava-4 is about an hour and some of my compatriots claim that replacing the engine on the T-80U is also about an hour, I did not change it on tanks.
          1. 0
            15 September 2015 17: 59
            Quote: saturn.mmm
            Some of your compatriots claim that replacing the engine on the Merkava-4 is about an hour

            On the roller above, the engine at Leopard was changed in a matter of minutes, on Merkava this is done even faster.

            Quote: artura0911
            firstly on merkava not 3 but 4 crews, secondly changing the leopard’s engine is much faster than your merkavushka’s

            You split me. Not 4 crews, but 7.40. And the engine there is generally not replaceable. laughing
            1. +3
              15 September 2015 19: 46
              Maybe about an hour, is it without a tap?
        2. +2
          15 September 2015 16: 27
          firstly on the mercava, not 3 but 4 crews; secondly, changing the leopard’s engine is much faster than your merkavushka’s.
        3. +1
          15 September 2015 17: 55
          and don’t worry about us, video to the studio
      2. +1
        15 September 2015 16: 29
        they don’t have a chariot, but a big tractor with a cannon)))))))
      3. +4
        15 September 2015 17: 20
        And when did you see that this man from the desert once praised Russian weapons.
    2. +4
      15 September 2015 18: 47
      And what is actually shown here? How did you change the engine in ideal conditions, which turned out to be 20 meters from the tank being repaired? Now imagine a similar situation on the battlefield. The tank requires an engine change. the engine is in the rear, there is a continuous shelling. Until they deliver, while they replace. here are a few hours. Yes. In the film, the engine, too, was somehow not very long and the workers put it there.
    3. +5
      15 September 2015 19: 19
      Interesting video. I am not special, but within the limits of commonplace logic, I can reason. wink
      The video shows that the torque from the engine is transmitted to the drive axles using clutch mechanisms. I saw two of them (one in front, one on the right), but, probably, there is one on the left.
      In order to remove the clutch mechanism from its working position for dismantling, it must be mechanically disconnected either by unscrewing a bunch of nuts, or (theoretically) feeding the working fluid into a certain disconnecting mechanism. I did not notice the nuts, which means - the working fluid. For example, hydraulics or pneumatics.
      Everything is good when it is, and if the car is damaged, then it is not there and then it is not possible to remove the engine in principle. Well, maybe adjust the external pressure source. But it will help only if the pipeline system is not damaged. If damaged - see above.

      It is unlikely that a Russian tank has such "advanced" mechanics. (God forbid...)
      Hence, a few hours - you need to unscrew the nuts!
      There aren’t any nuts on the video.

      Europe, damn it! smile
    4. +2
      18 September 2015 01: 11
      I saw this video from Leo before and after reading it I also remembered him, but I didn’t sting the patriots, and as you can see, you get pleasure from this)))))))))))))))))))))) ))))
  8. +1
    15 September 2015 08: 37
    They made a step in the right direction.
  9. -1
    15 September 2015 08: 45
    Again, one water ... why write dozens of articles about what? Everyone watched this video. There is nothing interesting there that they no longer knew.
  10. or
    0
    15 September 2015 08: 47
    Tagil rules !
  11. -3
    15 September 2015 08: 50
    The car is impressive, it is a pity that it is already being prepared for "potential buyers".
    1. +5
      15 September 2015 09: 56
      They are not going to sell it anywhere until the troops provide it.
      1. +1
        15 September 2015 14: 22
        well, the T-50s together with India are going to rivet, and now they are intensively advertising the T-14, so I would not be so sure.
        1. +1
          16 September 2015 10: 11
          Well, FGFA was originally a joint project, and the T-14 is shown for advertising armored vehicles.
  12. +2
    15 September 2015 08: 53
    It is a pity that they did not show how KAZ works. And I wonder where the shells are thrusting?
  13. +3
    15 September 2015 09: 29
    Question amateur.
    What do you think, are there any duplicate mechanical devices for controlling the tank? As it seems to me, in the conditions of modern warfare, it is not a big deal to disable electronics, for example, "Donald Cook", and then what should the crew do? Even if the partners do not yet have such electronic warfare systems, they will appear.
    1. +2
      15 September 2015 10: 03
      Donald Cook is not an example, if a gun was pointed at you and a fly circled nearby, you would run away and everyone said that the fly scared you, on the arm all systems are duplicated, they said this in the program
      1. 0
        15 September 2015 10: 21
        If everything is duplicated then there are no questions)
  14. +4
    15 September 2015 11: 24
    Quote: Gost
    Do you think there are duplicate mechanical devices for controlling the tank. It seems to me that under the conditions of modern warfare, it is not a great deal of work to disable electronics, the example of "Donald Cook"

    Wired systems are, of course, an order of magnitude more difficult to derive than wireless ones, especially with good shielding. But, as I said already, the excessive computerization of American technology is its weak point and in the end it will die precisely because of this
    1. +1
      15 September 2015 13: 11
      Quote: qwert
      Wired systems are, of course, an order of magnitude more difficult to derive than wireless ones, especially with good shielding.

      Now glass wires, they do not need screens, they are small and light, you can repeatedly reserve.
      Quote: qwert
      But, as I said already, the excessive computerization of American technology is its weak point and in the end it will die precisely because of this

      They have high hopes for robots and work a lot on this.
      1. +3
        15 September 2015 14: 53
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        They have high hopes for robots and work a lot on this.

        lol Skynet not? and T-100-1000? Then the whole world will rake their mess wassat
        1. 0
          15 September 2015 16: 01
          Quote: Corsair
          Skynet not?

          The whole world, and without Skynet, rakes their mess.
          The US mechanical donkey impressed me.
  15. 0
    15 September 2015 13: 01
    all of this is certainly good, but ... I had questions: to evacuate the crew, and also, whether it is necessary to do everything on the same platform? The maintenance is understandable, but the feasibility, the tasks are different.
    1. +2
      15 September 2015 13: 18
      so we have 2 more platforms, it’s Kurgan and boomerang. and the fact that the armored infantry fighting vehicle and tow truck has always been the usual practice, Jews based on the T72 BMP have one of the best security
  16. +15
    15 September 2015 13: 27
    Good day!

    On one site already and funny comments pop up from ours:

    "It all started with the casting of the great Oplot tanks
    3 "Bastions" were given to the elves (Baltic states), who valued SS parades and sprats above all else.
    7 are given to the gnomes (Thais) - the great rice earners and masters of transvestism.
    and 9, nine tanks were handed over to Ancient Ukrain - immortal creatures, the wisest and most just of all living.
    But they were all deceived. Because another tank was made.
    In the country of Mordor, on the top of the fateful mountain of Uralvagonzavod, the Kremlin ruler Putin, secretly created a single tank of omnipotence, the T - 14, subjugating all others. And in this tank he invested all the knowledge, all the technologies and developments, brazenly stolen from the Ancient Ukrov. One tank able to rule all !!! "
  17. +3
    15 September 2015 14: 01
    I'm interested in the opinion of real tankers.
    These displays confuse me, at full speed when shaking, how to poke fingers at them?
    And I, in the sense of periscopes, for which I can hold on with both hands, I did not observe optics.
    No matter how mild the move is, I think it’s not childishly shaking in battle.
    Or am I wrong?
    1. 0
      15 September 2015 14: 25
      But in nature, uncles are tankers, here’s how to poke at the device when our tank is so fast over the bumps that its head bounces? Explain to the youngster?
    2. 0
      15 September 2015 14: 38
      There are no longer spring springs, but gas (well, or electromagnetic in general) springs, otherwise they would have come up with something else.
    3. 0
      15 September 2015 17: 10
      Quote: tundra
      No matter how mild the move is, I think it’s not childishly shaking in battle.
      Even the old tanks have a mild course, there is no shaking.
    4. 0
      15 September 2015 19: 51
      Tundryak.

      Very reasonable remark. These poking screens and many other questions.

      For example, and as in gloves pokes. For example, I spend 100% of my working time in leather gloves. Even if in my car +50 C. Why should I tear my hands if there are gloves.
      1. 0
        15 September 2015 20: 24
        My friend doesn’t take such astronauts, geese and dirt even in gloves, but inside, like in an expensive current wagon in slippers
  18. 0
    15 September 2015 14: 24
    In particular, the issue of creating a crewless modification controlled from a remote control is considered.

    Indeed, they said. And why not B. The tank is fully electronically controlled, it would be logical to take the crew not to the armored capsule, but generally beyond the battlefield. One tank with a crew in a closed position. And the second tank without a crew, controlled from a distance from the first tank.
    1. 0
      15 September 2015 14: 58
      Quote: jcksmt
      Indeed, they said. And why not B. The tank is fully electronically controlled, it would be logical to take the crew not to the armored capsule, but generally beyond the battlefield. One tank with a crew in a closed position. And the second tank without a crew, controlled from a distance from the first tank.

      belay Any external control can be intercepted or suppressed with proper preparation and availability of electronic warfare equipment, so no one relies solely on drones, interception-landing-control, possibly even reprogramming or replacing targets.
      And artificial intelligence did not reach the level of complete independence, although Skynet Hollywood has long come up with.
      1. 0
        15 September 2015 20: 00
        Corsairs.

        Well, right, every comrade for electronic warfare devices. And even the foreman did not lose him in the last march.

        In fact, such an option for a tank so expensive looking too far plans. With a live crew, the tank commander will not go to certain death, at the request of a sergeant, to suppress the unpressed. Will offer 100 alternatives.
  19. 0
    15 September 2015 16: 07
    Krasava !!!!!!!
  20. +2
    15 September 2015 16: 55
    So much advertising about the tank! Probably the troops will not wait for it, everything is for sale!
  21. 0
    15 September 2015 20: 06
    I especially liked the high reverse speed.

    The shot was fired and rolled back until they slammed back. Yes, and on the streets in the city you can drive back, if you do not want to spend time on a U-turn. And then you will soar with a U-turn, you’ll also get RPGs
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 09: 22
      And most importantly, never retreat
      If something is reversing along the side of the road under a hundred, the gun is looking forward.
      Joke.
  22. -1
    15 September 2015 20: 45
    And I saw him in Tagil, the current nishtyak is small, or I'm so naughty, BMP based on the more impressive armata
  23. +1
    16 September 2015 10: 24
    "" reversible transmission. This unit has 8 forward speeds
    stroke and 8 reverse "////

    This is a very important and useful thing. From under the fire you can escape with a reverse
    without turning around (without substituting the side).
    Merkava has the same: the number of gears forward and backward is the same.
    Only can there be eight of them? Merkava has 5 of them, it seems ...
    1. 0
      16 September 2015 10: 58
      Is there a video of replacing the engine + transmission unit on a mercava? It would be interesting to see.
      Leo-2 to remove / put ~ 15 minutes (see video above), impressed!
      It is also interesting how long it will take to install the engine block on Armata !?
      1. 0
        16 September 2015 11: 31
        Quote: Kvaigon
        Is there a video of replacing the engine + transmission unit on a mercava? It would be interesting to see.

        Is there enough photo?
        In the






        On the base




  24. +6
    16 September 2015 22: 56
    Watching the video provided by the respected Professor raises one question: does the respected (really) Professor represent the difference between replacing the power unit of a tank and removing the power unit of the same tank? For what is presented to us as the greatest achievement of the "gloomy Teutonic genius" or "cunning sons of Israel" is the essence of "removing the power unit" or "installing the power unit." As Arkon correctly noted: "Where are the nuts?" One gets the feeling that the power unit is that the Leoperda, that the Merkava, is not rigidly fixed, but levitates in the MTO like x ... In a glass. And the torque is generally transmitted using invisible torsion fields! Anyone who has ever really CHANGED such things will say that most of the time during replacement falls on preparation for removal (dismantling work) and installation work after installation. For example (though we do not suck on the topic, since he served in aviation) preparation for removing the NK-12MP engine on a TU-95MS aircraft took at least 8-10 hours (when it is very "necessary", with good organization, the presence of a double set of special keys , the people are in place, they are not scattered around the outfits and with 5 years of experience, and not green summer days, and the battalion commander does not pull the crane operator with a crane every half hour to unload some extra urgent garbage, the engine mounting nuts go "with a half kick"), but The process of removing this bandura 4 meter long and weighing 2 kg took 700-20 minutes. The reverse process is 30-2 times longer. So we do not need to show off (meaning the video with the Leopard) as a "real process".
    1. 0
      21 September 2015 17: 43
      Quote: Fil743
      Is the respected (real) Professor the difference between replacing a power unit of a tank and removing a power unit of the same tank?

      We look again and carefully and teach the materiel before writing nonsense to the whole world:



      Quote: Fil743
      So we do not need to show off (meaning the video with the Leopard) as a "real process".

      I see you are a "tanker". Here is a road for replacing 4 wheels, "real process"... We set the time and tell everyone about the time of changing wheels based on the experience of changing wheels on a tractor "Belarus". laughing

  25. 0
    1 February 2016 23: 00
    They will bring fittings to mind 10-15 years. And is it unknowingly there is an active protection of the tank from ATGMs like Javelin?
  26. 0
    14 February 2017 12: 59
    Is the tank protected from anti-tank cluster munitions? I think when they put a laser on the tank, it will be too late to smoke. Since the cumulative core will already be started up by automation. Of course you can’t allow such shelling, but if so?