Ryazan Airborne School increased the number of cadets

Ryazan Higher Airborne Command School due to increased threats this year increased the number of cadets to 1257 people, reports MIC with reference to the press service of the military university.

“For the second year in a row, we recruit more than a thousand cadets. This is due to the potential challenges and threats that are possible against our state. We only have 50 thousand. Km length of our border. Plus tasks in the arctic zone. Therefore, the state made a decision, taking into account the nature of modern armed clashes, to increase the proportion of special units and units of the airborne troops,

quoted by the press service of the Commander of the Airborne Forces Vladimir Shamanov, who spoke on September 12 at the ceremony of taking the oath.

The school clarified that "the set has increased by almost 20 percent compared to last year."

“The first-year students of the airborne faculty, the special-purpose faculty, the faculty of communications and the faculty of secondary vocational education received military tickets with a note about bringing to military oath. The total number of college recruits was 1257 people, including 447 in the faculty of higher vocational education and 810 in the faculty of secondary special education, ”the message reads.

Earlier it was reported that by order of Shamanov every Wednesday in the school was declared “English”. “International studies and the implementation of international tasks are related to the knowledge of this language. Therefore, Wednesday is the day when the whole school will speak only English, ”said the commander.

He noted that 5 billion rubles had been spent on improving the educational process at the university in recent years. Recently, the Minister of Defense decided to allocate another 2-s billions "to create the most modern conditions for training officers."

Comments

[A-Sim]

The most appropriate investments are in the people of the future country.

[Mitek]

All right! Plus on the nose is the deployment of regiments to brigades. Yes, apparently there are still some changes coming ..

[Juborg]

Campaign increase in the number falls mainly on students of secondary vocational education, that is, 2-3 year training of foremen and ensigns. For higher education, the number is practically the same, although of course, compared with Taburetkin’s reforms, it has grown.

[vladimirZ]

Quote UBORG (3):
that is, 2-3 year training for foremen and warrant officers.

And why train "foremen and warrant officers" with 2-3 years of training?
In Soviet times, from the 70s, there were faculties in higher military schools with 2-3-year training of officers - lieutenants with secondary special training.
And here this experience can be applied, and it will probably be applied, having issued in 3 years a lot of cool officers who will cover their "Serdyukov" deficit, formed in the course of the ill-considered "reform" of the Army.

[captain]

I want to incur the wrath of most forum participants. Why do we need the largest (and therefore expensive) airborne forces ?. Are we going to throw landings in the USA or in Europe? Do we have enough transport aircraft? And most importantly, we have enough military aviation to provide a flight pass through the enemy’s air defense? Why have an 4 Airborne Division and an 4 Brigade? Why spend so much money on landing and equipment for paratroopers? It is enough to have a maximum of 1 division, but airborne assault brigades with helicopters in their composition would not hurt us to have much more, at least 8 units. And so we have paratroopers, we pay money for jumps, but we don’t have means of delivery to the territory of the enemy and the forces and means to ensure the suppression of enemy air defense. Can all the ground forces be reorganized into the Airborne Forces, but what is the use of this? It is not easier to have a double set of equipment for motorized rifle brigades on threatened theater of war and to transfer people at the right time, to conserve equipment and costs much less. I look forward to cons and criticism.

[yawa63]

Well, why are the minuses right away, the reasoning is quite sensible, I dare to assume that the graduates of the RvdvaKuKu also staff the DShB brigades (as it was before)

[vladimirZ]

Quote captain (1):
I want to incur the wrath of most forum participants. Why do we need the largest (and therefore expensive) Airborne Forces ?. Are we going to throw landings in the USA or in Europe?

And who said that they will only be used in the Airborne Forces?
After the "Serdyukov" reforms, dozens of schools were closed, and it takes time and money to restore them.
This is where not "reformed" schools will help, and the first among them is Ryazan, where command personnel can be trained for the infantry.

[jungler]

Mr. Rotmister. Have you studied at the RCPU? Served as an officer in the Airborne Forces? And for me, the whole school was 900 cadets (1977-1981) Do you really know how to reformat SV in the Airborne Forces? Then you need to teach at the ASH ... Well, well. I do not have such special knowledge. And it’s not about parachutes at all - it’s just a delivery vehicle. The point is tactics.

[marlin1203]

Hush, hush ... not only the paratroopers are our future leave space for other arms

[Gouging]

The main thing is that the quality does not suffer.

[Mitek]

Quote: Gouging

The main thing is that the quality does not suffer.

hehe, judging by the nickname a sore point)))) Do not be offended). But seriously, the Ryazan school has always been distinguished by the excellent quality of specialized education. We, in Tula, had a landing faculty, but weaker.

[yushch]

For example, in 1992, when I entered the RVDU, about 500-550 people entered the first year together with the special forces faculty. The first year after the collapse of the Union, the recruitment was by the number of the USSR army, but it was a little)) more Russian. We can conclude that the number of future officers is almost approaching the number of officers of the USSR Airborne Forces. I’ll say one thing about the quality of training, the entire teaching staff (with the exception of civilians) wearing a full dress uniform blinded the cadets in the sun with a huge number of military orders and medals received for participating in those conflicts that we did not hear about at that time.

[Signaller]

Great news. No one but us is the motto of the Airborne Forces. Go ahead guys. There is only one thing to envy. Although it is difficult to study there, I envy white envy for cadets and graduates. Good luck, guys .

[Andrey Yuryevich]

class ...! but I remember that Taburetkin great blew up the airborne,
, if my memory serves me, he called the landing: "green men", moreover, pejoratively ... KAZEL !!!

[Finches]

It is necessary to revive the schools destroyed by Serdyukov! One cannot win a war! With all due respect to the Airborne Forces! We need tankmen, signalmen, infantrymen, engineers, pilots ....! We need highly professional personnel officers who can train and educate the personnel of the Armed Forces! A decision has been made to make a complete transition to a professional army — God bless him! But with a large-scale continental war using conventional weapons — the professional army will very quickly disappear and will need to be equipped with a mobilization resource that will need to be prepared in the conditions of war ...

Who will do this - Serdyukov with Vasilyeva - experienced governors?

[lukke]

we have enough schools and so. It is necessary to increase the population of the country and take care of his health with all the resulting social programs, so that there is someone to serve and whom to protect). In the 6th grade, my son already has half myopia !! not to mention other hidden ailments such as allergics and other garbage about which in my childhood I did not know. By draft age in the afternoon with fire suitable for 1 category you will not find (

[Finches]

I’m not sure that we have enough military schools! Here they are:

1. Military Academy of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation
2. Military Training and Scientific Center of the Ground Forces "Combined Arms Academy 3. Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"
4. Military training and scientific center of the Air Force "Air Force Academy named. professors N.E. Zhukovsky and Yu.A. Gagarina "(Voronezh)
5. Military training and scientific center of the Navy "Naval Academy named. Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union N.G. Kuznetsova
6. Military Academy of Strategic Missile Forces. Peter the Great
7. Military Space Academy. A.F. Mozhaysky
8. Yaroslavl Higher Military School of Air Defense
9. Military academy of military air defense of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Marshal of the Soviet Union A.M. Vasilevsky
10. Military Academy of Aerospace Defense. Marshal of the Soviet Union G.K. Zhukova
11.Mikhailov Military Artillery Academy
12. Military Academy of Communications. Marshal of the Soviet Union S.M. Budyonny
13. Krasnodar Higher Military School named after Army General S.M. Shtemenko
14. The Military Academy of Radiation, Chemical and Biological Protection. Marshal of the Soviet Union S.K. Tymoshenko
15. The Military Academy of Logistics Army General A.V. Khruleva
16. The Pacific Higher Naval School. S.O. Makarova
17. Ryazan Higher Airborne Command School named after Army General V.F. Margelova
18. The Black Sea Higher Naval Order of the Red Star School named after P.S. Nakhimova
19. The Tyumen Higher Military Engineering Command School named after Marshal A.I. Proshlyakova
20. Cherepovets Higher Military Engineering College of Radio Electronics
21. Military University of the Ministry of Defense
22.Medical Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov

22 Higher educational institutions for all types and branches of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation!

And you can pay attention that this is mainly ACADEMY or VUNTSy - do you understand me? Schools used to train junior officers, and then they entered after a certain time of service at the academy, and now they mixed everything - blood, shit, sand and sugar! It is not right!

[lukke]

But what about the Academy - this is the same old school, only with inflated supplementary education, where subjects were added to the minimum school hours, staffing, positions were inflated, and the term of study was from 4 to 5, etc. (this is from the 90s). And some were reorganized quite rationally - for example, we take Mozhaika - it has a bunch of faculties that are still old (before its reform), plus LVVKTU with its topographers and a group in each course of cartographers entered it. There were 2 higher education institutions - there was one. True, these two universities are territorially nearby and their merger is simply fate itself). Graduates are junior officers.

[Finches]

The result is dispersal! As an example, the snotty 18-year-old cadet, who is trained by the platoon commander and the clumsy 35-year-old major, who is trained by the chief of staff of the brigade, is taught by the same doctor of science! And these are completely different levels of training and completely different teaching methods - it doesn’t lead to anything good at all! We don’t combine a kindergarten with a university for some reason ?? Everything goes in stages!

[lukke]

a trigonometry teacher for grade 10 can easily (if time in the schedule allows) give lessons in algebra for grade 7 and mathematics for grade 3. He gets over the academic hours. And so it turns out you need three teachers.
No, maybe of course I don’t know much, but large training centers are cheaper and easier in terms of logistics. (We do not take into account the history of the university, traditions, etc.) - this is all also acquired.

[Finches]

Warfare is not school trigonometry! The basis of warfare is the upbringing and complete psychological breakdown of a young man - this should be done by some people, and the training of senior and senior officers with experience in life and service, others! The approaches are completely different!
It is cheaper to manage, here you are right, but as if in the pursuit of cost savings, do not miss the main thing ... That's the thing!

[Dart2027]

Quote: Finches

The basis of military affairs is the upbringing and complete psychological breakdown of a young man

This is not done in lectures.

[Finches]

Absolutely right! That is the difference - a military school with a barracks, and an appropriate military approach, from a military academy with a hostel and university attitude towards students!
Like all future officers, I lived in a two-tier barracks at the graduation course, went in formation with the company, under the drum, and even two months before graduation, for the fault, I ended up on guardhouse with my comrades ... This is school! Discipline - taken for granted! With this school, I went to the troops as a platoon commander, without fear!

[Dart2027]

Everything is so, just in the same training center you can organize separate classes for those who are trained as officers and those who improve their qualifications. The same people can read the theory, of course to each his own, well, and then there is a separation. Roughly speaking, some live in the barracks, and from there they go to theoretical training, and then they go to the training ground, while others come to the theory and at the end they leave. I heard something like this in conversations when I myself served.

[Sapsap]

I agree with you. In the system of higher military education, there is no Military Engineering Academy (the oldest academy in the RF Armed Forces !!!), which was unreasonably disbanded in 2005-2006. The experience of wars, including the Second World War, as well as local ones, shows that without engineers it is extremely difficult to solve problems and losses from mine weapons can be large. And one more thing: ensuring the mobility of our troops and hindering the actions of enemy troops (counter-mobility). Not enough attention is being paid to this issue now. But let us recall the experience of military operations of the OKSV in the DRA or the OGVS in the Czech Republic. Who was there, and more than once will immediately understand what is at stake.

[Finches]

Sergey! I welcome you to the site! You are absolutely right!

[lukke]

Do you mean im.Kuybyshev in Moscow?

[Sapsap]

I agree with you. In the system of higher military education, there is no Military Engineering Academy (the oldest academy in the RF Armed Forces !!!), which was unreasonably disbanded in 2005-2006. The experience of wars, including the Second World War, as well as local ones, shows that without engineers it is extremely difficult to solve problems and losses from mine weapons can be large. And one more thing: ensuring the mobility of our troops and hindering the actions of enemy troops (counter-mobility). Not enough attention is being paid to this issue now. But let us recall the experience of military operations of the OKSV in the DRA or the OGVS in the Czech Republic. Who was there, and more than once will immediately understand what is at stake.

[Finches]

Himself and stupidly enumerated - not 22, but 21 !!!
Sorry, comrades!

[g1v2]

We must not revive the sediment tanks destroyed by Serdyukov for officers who have nowhere to go for children, but to build new educational centers. With a modern material base, with teachers from the troops who can actually transfer combat experience, and not retell the training manual of twenty years ago. With training on equipment that will only enter the troops and instructors from manufacturers. If the school is a tank, there should be a teacher from the Uralvagonzavod, if the aviation school, there should be teachers from Sukhoi, Mikoyan, Tupolev, Ilyushin, Mil, Kamov and so on. Modern technology is much more complicated than the technology of the Second World War and its manufacturers, in my opinion, should help to teach its use. As for the Airborne Forces, Shamanov’s order to study the English language clearly speaks of the future use of their paratroopers abroad. Maybe in Syria, or maybe somewhere else.

[iliitchitch]

But this is good - this is not some kind of West Point. The amount of improvement is impressive.

[novobranets]

Therefore, Wednesday will be the day when the whole school will only speak English, ”said the commander.

It makes sense. You need to know the language of a potential enemy, at least at the level - "either you tell everything that you know, or I will attach you to the wall."

[roskot]

English, as the language of a likely adversary, needs to be known. What about the Ukrainian mob? It can be useful...

[brr1]

There, the issue is solved with the help of red-hot tongs. And complete understanding.

[Old26]

Quote: Finches

It is necessary to revive the schools destroyed by Serdyukov! One cannot win a war! With all due respect to the Airborne Forces! We need tankmen, signalmen, infantrymen, engineers, pilots ....! We need highly professional personnel officers who can train and educate the personnel of the Armed Forces! A decision has been made to make a complete transition to a professional army — God bless him! But with a large-scale continental war using conventional weapons — the professional army will very quickly disappear and will need to be equipped with a mobilization resource that will need to be prepared in a war ... Who will it be to do - Serdyukov with Vasilyeva?

No one argues what is needed. But for the most part - this is, alas, an impossible task. In place of former schools - now anything. But this is not the main thing. Many of the officers and teachers left for civilian life; it is now difficult to return them. New - schools, or rather, the teaching staff is formed over the years - if you start now, maybe in 10 years such a skeleton will form. Well, the material base is needed. More short questions than answers

[Ivan Tucha]

KVAKU was closed, the Airborne Troops faculty in Tula (also incidentally in the 94th opened for the same reasons plus losses ...) together with Artukha were closed, and now there are no people ... Everything, as usual, is through the back seat ...

[combat66]

In 1988, during the all-union military-sports competitions between military schools, our MVVPOU (now re-profiled into the Border Institute) took 2nd place. They rode like young stallions, but what are you - the second, after "Ryazan"!
So the level of “Ryazan” has always been, it is prestigious to be equal to them.
Good luck guys!

[wild weld]

finally, our army becomes prestigious among the population

[proto ukr]

nobody but you !!! Glory of the Airborne Forces

[proto ukr]

army of dill - the most ludicrous in the universe, a combat hapak and sharavara

[proto ukr]

army of dill - the most ludicrous in the universe, a combat hapak and sharavara

[atamankko]

The military profession has always been prestigious,
but with a stool and his broads, prestige fell,
thank god that is now a normal minister of defense.

[MolGro]

FOR THE ARMY OF RUSSIA!

[Old26]

Quote: captain

Why have 4 airborne divisions and 4 brigades

In fact, there are only 2 - 98 and 106 purely airborne divisions now. It seems that another 104 are planned as VDD. Two - DSD. Plus 5 teams (if you count the 45th SN).

[Evil 55]

The airborne forces have proven their effectiveness with their history .. Moreover, the times are now very turbulent ..