The complex of passive location "Avtobaz-M"

The complex of passive location “Avtobaz-M” is intended for the detection, classification and subsequent trajectory tracking of air and sea targets by the emission of radio-electronic means installed on them (passive radar process). The Avtobaz-M ground-based electronic reconnaissance complex allows monitoring the coordinates and other key targets of the targets and automatically transmitting them to the command posts of the air defense units. The Avtobaz-M ground-based electronic reconnaissance complex includes 4 detection and direction finding stations (SOP) and an information processing station (SOI).


The developer of the passive location complex is the joint stock company Scientific and Technical Center of Electronic Warfare (JSC NTC EW). This is a fairly young, but actively developing enterprise of the Russian defense industry complex. The company is an effective developer of modern types of EW equipment and one of the participants in the creation of an EW system of the Russian Federation. The company was founded just 10 years ago in the year 2005. In 2010, the company opened a branch in Voronezh (System Research and Development Center), which today employs more than 60 specialists. Starting from 2010 of the year, “SEC EW” is in the Consolidated register of organizations of the defense industry complex of the Russian Federation.

The complex of passive location "Avtobaz-M"


An unparalleled passive radar system “Avtobaz-M” was created in the “SEC EW” under the leadership of Alexander Sarkisyan. For the first time, the complex was demonstrated at the MAKS-2013 air show at the stand of the Defense Systems holding. For the first time information about this system appeared on MVSV-2008 (International Salon of Armaments and Military Equipment), in the collection devoted to the novelties of the cabin it was noted: “The classic active radar tools that were used earlier nowadays are becoming obsolete. Any inclusion of such means is immediately detected by the enemy’s intelligence, which allows them to be destroyed almost instantly. At the same time, the Avtobaz-M passive electronic intelligence reconnaissance complex (KRTR) is a major step forward in this regard. The complex is able to capture up to 150 types of radiating signals, issuing their bearings. The work of KRTR "Avtobaz-M" in combination with two other similar stations allows you to ensure the exact coordinates of the air target. The obtained information can be used in large air defense systems as target designation. Depending on the signal strength, the range of the complex is from 350 to 400 kilometers. In addition, information from Avtobaz-M can be used as a target indication for command posts controlling electronic suppression systems and for command posts of air defense. At the moment, the modernized AvtoBaz-M KRTR is a practically new system that surpasses all the existing analogues created on the basis of Avtobaz CRTR, including the development of the Czech Republic - Tamara and Vera.

The Avtobaz-M complex, as noted above, consists of four receiving posts of the detection and direction finding system (SOP) and an information processing station (SOI). Any modern aircraft radiates something - it is a physical phenomenon that you cannot go against. Sensitive sensors SOP able to capture this radiation by sending information to the central post - PIO, where data is processed and displayed on the monitor screen, forming a picture of the air situation. In the range of the complex, it becomes clear who and where is flying.



The passive radio intelligence complex Avtobaz-M provides intelligence for pulse and continuous radar signals of both airborne and sea-based objects, as well as signals of the friend-to-others (IFF) and TAC AN systems, trajectory radar detection and signal parameters tracking of detected air and sea objects by radiation of radio-electronic means on board them and transferring the obtained intelligence information to higher-level automated command and control anti-aircraft defense units. Avtobaz-M passive location complex can be used in air defense systems, air threat warning systems and electronic warfare. As the developers themselves note, the passive mode of operation of the complex increases the survivability of air defense and electronic warfare groups on 30-40% due to a significant increase in the secretive nature of the operation of active systems (radar stations and interference stations).

It is reported that stations belonging to the Avtobaz-M complex of the passive location can be used autonomously as radio intelligence stations, they can collect, accumulate and subsequently process information on radiating aerial targets. An excellent complement to this complex can be the Spatial-Distributive Interference System “Field-21”, which was also created by the specialists of “STC EW”. The combination of network-centric and hierarchical control methods underlying this interference station ensures that the system is highly resistant to attempts to disrupt its performance, and the small size and weight of the interference equipment (due to implementation on a solid-state electronic component base) allows the 21 Field to be placed on a variety of moving or stationary objects. MAX-2013 reported that both systems successfully passed the tests. However, both are available in export versions. Interest in such systems is quite large. Still, install “Field-21E” and no “Tomahawk” can get you. And if you have your own air defense system and the Avtobaz-M complex, you yourself will be able to try to destroy any enemy aircraft before he realizes that he has already been found and is in sight.

According to Alexander Sarkisyan, General Director of the SEC EW JSC, the Avtobaz-M passive location complex is able to detect and track air targets more than 200 kilometers from 150. At the same time, the accuracy of tracking air objects will be comparable to the capabilities of active locators, he noted in an interview with the Military Industrial Courier edition in August 2015. According to him, the AvtoBaz-M CTRD implemented a mathematical apparatus that allows, with the availability of a relevant information base, with a high probability of identifying not only classes, but also types of air targets. In this case, all the information obtained by the complex on the air situation is transmitted via communication channels to higher command posts.



The use of passive location systems in modern conditions is becoming increasingly justified. Experts have long known that the used active radar tools (especially on-duty), with high radiation power, become the primary objectives for enemy electronic intelligence and destruction equipment using modern self-guided weapons weapons. Low mobility and long airtime make active radar systems particularly vulnerable to modern guided weapons. This is confirmed by numerous examples of real hostilities that were conducted by individual countries or their coalitions in different parts of the world: in Vietnam, Yugoslavia, Iraq, and also in Libya, in which active radar stations of local air defense systems became the primary targets for It strikes with anti-radar missiles.

At the same time, the principle of passive location is based on the reception of signals from radio-emitting air targets by several space-separated direction-finding and measuring posts and the subsequent joint processing of signals received from air targets according to certain mathematical procedures. As a result of this approach, detection and trajectory tracking of targets, as well as the possibility of their identification, are realized without the radiation of probing signals being broadcast. Such possibilities of passive location determine the high interest of the Russian army in strengthening air defense groups by such means. In addition, there is a great need for such systems in the global arms market, notes Alexander Sarkisyan. However, it should not be assumed that passive location tools will become an alternative to traditional means of active location. They should be considered as the possibility of expanding the combat capabilities of air defense groups and reducing their vulnerability when the enemy uses modern high-precision weapons.

Tactical and technical characteristics KRTR "Avtobaz-M":

The operating frequency range is from 0,2 to 18 GHz (it allows including the classification and maintenance of the AWACS and Hokai systems).
The space survey method is an electronic circular azimuth survey and 30 degrees in elevation.
The method of determining the coordinates - difference-distance method.
Instant Review Range:
- in the frequency range 2-18 GHz: 16 GHz;
- in the frequency range 0,2-2 GHz: 30 MHz.
Target detection range - to 400 km.
The standard error of the coordinate determination (MSE) is no more than 2% of the distance.
The number of simultaneously accompanied targets - up to 150.
The update time of information about the IRI at the station is no more than 2,5 with.
Library volume - up to 2000 images and target operation modes.
MTBF time is at least 600 hours.
Fault localization time is no more than 30 minutes.
Deployment time of fighting / collapsing - 45 minutes.
Time to bring the complex on alert - 3-5 minutes.









Information sources:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/26718
http://nevskii-bastion.ru/avtobaza-m
http://www.arms-expo.ru/photo/fotoreportazh/kompleks-passivnoy-lokatsii (фото)
http://www.ntc-reb.ru
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Professor 10 September 2015 07: 04 New
    • -13
    • 0
    -13
    Unmatched passive radar system "AvtoBAZ-M" ...

    But what about Mail? wink
    The chain-mail complex consists of three stations. He is able to accurately determine the coordinates of ground and surface targets, their movement routes at a distance of up to 600 km in the depth of the territory and 1000 km along the front, and for air targets flying at an altitude of 10 km - up to 800 km.

    Now, the officials will tell how an American drone in the Islamic state of Iran landed an avalanche-free complex of passive locations Avtobaza-M. I'm going for popcorn. wassat
    1. Sirocco 10 September 2015 08: 24 New
      • 13
      • 0
      +13
      Quote: Professor
      Avtobaza-M landed an American drone

      Hello Professor, can you learn more about the American drone, and how did it land?
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 08: 54 New
          • 13
          • 0
          +13
          Well, here you have the Professor - he himself launched the shnyaga;)
          1. Juborg 10 September 2015 12: 12 New
            • 12
            • 0
            +12
            Quote: Russian Uzbek
            Well, here you have the Professor - he himself launched the shnyaga;)


            NATIONAL FEATURE, DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THE PROFESSOR. Yasha Kedmi talks about such people, spoiled the air there (at home), and here he spoils, but he breathes himself.
      2. gregor6549 10 September 2015 09: 50 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        There was such a hype in the media, I remember. I also remember that analogues of the Automobile Base, low-base passive radar systems appeared in the USSR in the 60 years. When they appeared at the "friends" I do not remember. but most likely at the same time, if not earlier. But the problem is that such complexes can more or less accurately determine only the angular coordinates of a radio source, for example, an onboard radar or an active jammer. And this will not be enough for the air defense system. They would also know the distance to the source of interference and the height would not hurt. And here we have to use triangulation systems, i.e. passive location system with a very decent base between direction finders of the order of a hundred another km.
        1. voyaka uh 10 September 2015 10: 54 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          "ie a passive location system with a very decent base between direction finders
          about a hundred different km. "///

          I also heard something like that. For example, an F-22 span can be detected if it
          fly over a strip of passive direction finders several hundred meters wide
          kilometers, roughly staggered.
          1. gregor6549 11 September 2015 13: 41 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Wide-base systems of passive radar or direction finding differ from low-base systems mainly in that they allow more accurate determination of the coordinates of the object being detected. If the F22 flies in the radio silence mode, neither small-base nor wide-base can detect it. Nobody has canceled physics yet, even if someone really wants it. There was already a tale about how in Yugoslavia one very clever Yugoslav air defense officer detected F117 using a mobile network, after which there was F117. naturally attached muzzle to the ground. With reality, this bike didn’t lie close, just as the bike did not lie about the possibility of creating an airplane completely invisible to radars. But confusing active radar with passive is also not worth it.
        2. Andrey NM 10 September 2015 11: 51 New
          • 9
          • 0
          +9
          Submariners have long been using the method of calculating the elements of the target’s motion along bearings in the passive noise direction finding mode of the “three bearings and approximate distance” type and options. What is the difference between math calculations? The target height is added as a variable. BIUS normally counted this task even on a very ancient elemental base. In both cases, the system is passive, there is data in the direction of the target. The error is too big, 2% of 400km is 8km. And if there are two or three spaced receivers, then there is no question at all, with the established exchange of data, the target is at the intersection of bearings. Most likely this method is used.
        3. Beaver 24 September 2015 12: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: gregor6549
          They would also know the distance to the source of interference and the height would not hurt. And here you have to use triangulation systems already

          The article states:
          The method of determining the coordinates - difference-distance method.

          The same method as in GPS. Further explain?
          The article is very interesting, although it gives away a lot of advertising. To be honest, the performance characteristics of "unparalleled" were not impressed. Not very far from the “Tamara” with her younger and older sisters. From modern developments I want more.
          The means of detection should accompany many times more targets than the means of destruction, and not vice versa; mobility, reliability, maintainability - sadness. Opportunities for detecting targets in silent mode have not been disclosed.
    2. Hammer 10 September 2015 09: 40 New
      • -7
      • 0
      -7
      Well, a big shovel, a fan, a big pile .omna ... The thing is familiar, right? wink
      As they say take more, throw further - watch while spraying. wink
    3. sivuch 15 September 2015 15: 17 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Skydron at the airbase wrote about Kolchug. And, in particular, why it is intended in the first place.
      And he wrote without sub-ok and without cheers-patriotism
  2. qwert 10 September 2015 07: 22 New
    • 14
    • 0
    +14
    Well, after all, different trolls turned the phrase "having no analogues" into a laughing stock. Now it is worth avoiding it even in those cases when it corresponds to reality.

    PS Speaking of trolls, I do not mean the Professor, whom I have great respect, although sometimes I want to bite. But I’ll never blame him like that.
    1. Sirocco 10 September 2015 08: 21 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: qwert
      Well, after all, at one time different trolls turned the phrase "having no analogues"

      We all forgot that this phrase, and the prerogative of its use, belongs only to Israel.
      All others have analogues)))))))
      1. Professor 10 September 2015 08: 36 New
        • -14
        • 0
        -14
        Quote: Sirocco
        We all forgot that this phrase, and the prerogative of its use, belongs only to Israel.

        Not ... Not having analogues in the world is not even translated into Hebrew. laughing
        1. Sirocco 10 September 2015 08: 50 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: Professor
          Not ... Not having analogues in the world is not even translated into Hebrew.

          Well, thank God, at least something has no analogues, and is not translated. I began to worry))))
        2. Hammer 10 September 2015 09: 43 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Professor
          Not ... Not having analogues in the world is not even translated into Hebrew.


          but why translate ... all exactly all the pundits in the land of Israel are Russian-speaking. is that so professor? wink laughing
        3. PQ-18 10 September 2015 11: 41 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Having no analogues in the world is not even translated into Hebrew

          it is among the Jews ... "at the genetic level"! wink lol
        4. Ezhaak 10 September 2015 11: 45 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Professor
          Having no analogues in the world is not even translated into Hebrew

          But it is actively used by the Israelis in relation to their weapons. An example in a recent article and comments on this site regarding Jewish ships assembled in Azerbaijan and weapons on it. Another nonsense of a professor?
    2. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 08: 58 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      the phrase "unparalleled" came from American companies' brochures;) it is often used there words and phrases like that: invulnerable, unparalleled, not visible to, ultramodern, etc.
      what in what and in advertising our so-called "partners" really have no equal;)
      1. Professor 10 September 2015 09: 00 New
        • -17
        • 0
        -17
        Quote: Russian Uzbek
        the phrase "unparalleled" came from American companies' brochures;) it is often used there words and phrases like that: invulnerable, unparalleled, not visible to, ultramodern, etc.
        what in what and in advertising our so-called "partners" really have no equal;)

        Yes? Well, and how does it sound in English "having no taxes in the world"? wink
        1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 09: 35 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          I'm not a philologist! perhaps in English there is no such phrase, but in any there is a similar meaning
          1. Professor 10 September 2015 09: 52 New
            • -12
            • 0
            -12
            Quote: Russian Uzbek
            I'm not a philologist! perhaps in English there is no such phrase, but in any there is a similar meaning

            You’re not a philologist, you’re saying that "ftimes "unparalleled" came from advertisements of American firms;)"
            You already decide. wink

            Quote: Hammer
            but why translate ... all exactly all the pundits in the land of Israel are Russian-speaking. is that so professor?

            Right At the Faculty of Aeronautics of the Technion, not a single Russian-speaking teacher. In other faculties, units. Among the Nobel laureates of Israel, not a single Russian-speaking.
            1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 10: 35 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              but there is a Professor! Russian-speaking by the way ...
              but tell me, dear Prof, if an English-speaking brow needs to give out a phrase that is close in meaning to: "having no analogues" how is it expressed?
              you enlighten us dark barbarians ...
              1. Professor 10 September 2015 11: 31 New
                • -10
                • 0
                -10
                Quote: Russian Uzbek
                but tell me, dear Prof, if an English-speaking brow needs to give out a phrase that is close in meaning to: "having no analogues" how is it expressed?
                you enlighten us dark barbarians ...

                In English they will most likely say “unique”, in Hebrew “for the first time in the world”.
                1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 12: 33 New
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  +5
                  what's the difference? the meaning is the same ... you can translate by the way in different ways ...
                  so all your philological freaks ordinary trollin
                  when people have nothing to say, they begin philological research ...
                  and also my friend lives in Israel - in the Russian-speaking neighborhoods in Haifa, and so he told me that there is a puhhh (you can’t write that way;)) Talmudist fanatics along with their Hebrew and other nonsense on a cannon shot is not allowed ...
                  1. Professor 10 September 2015 13: 00 New
                    • -4
                    • 0
                    -4
                    Quote: Russian Uzbek
                    what's the difference? the meaning is the same ... you can translate by the way in different ways ...
                    so all your philological freaks ordinary trollin

                    fool

                    Quote: Russian Uzbek
                    and also my friend lives in Israel - in the Russian-speaking neighborhoods in Haifa, and so he told me that there is a puhhh (you can’t write that way;)) Talmudist fanatics along with their Hebrew and other nonsense on a cannon shot is not allowed ...

                    Double nonsense. There are no Russian-speaking neighborhoods in Haifa. The Russians live in all quarters of Haifa. Religious go wherever they want.

                    Quote: PQ-18
                    evil languages ​​say that soon in Israel and among DOCTORS there will be no Russian speakers! ...
                    however, in some Russian medical institutions, Israeli doctors are happy to learn from ...

                    Israeli doctors throughout their career learn from the experience of their colleagues. They are constantly learning from those who are stronger than them.
                    1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 13: 42 New
                      • 5
                      • 0
                      +5
                      ... yes ... and another friend said that they even don’t want to teach Hebrew there and send all the "enlighteners" tries!
                      and there was even a booze in the Knesset about this, when Talmudists raised a howl like "the new Russian-speaking citizens (mostly immigrants from the USSR) do not want to naturalize," they do not want to learn Hebrew and heed p.u. ym ...
                      1. Professor 10 September 2015 13: 52 New
                        • -3
                        • 0
                        -3
                        Quote: Russian Uzbek
                        ... yes ... and another friend said that they even don’t want to teach Hebrew there and send all the "enlighteners" tries!

                        Unique and we meet. Nevertheless, without knowledge of Hebrew, one cannot find a normal job, do not get an education, and so on. I also met in Germany those who lived there for more than 10 years and could not connect 2 words.

                        Quote: Russian Uzbek
                        and there was even a booze in the Knesset about this, when Talmudists raised a howl like "the new Russian-speaking citizens (mostly immigrants from the USSR) do not want to naturalize," they do not want to learn Hebrew and heed p.u. ym ...

                        Do not remember that. In general, the parliament in Israel is a place for discussion. Sometimes you hear enough of it. lol
            2. PQ-18 10 September 2015 11: 45 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Among the Nobel laureates of Israel, not a single Russian-speaking

              evil languages ​​say that soon in Israel and among DOCTORS there will be no Russian speakers! ...
              however, in some Russian medical institutions, Israeli doctors are happy to learn from ...
              1. Aleksandr72 10 September 2015 17: 10 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Always said never argue, especially with the Jews (no offense smile ) - God's chosen people have honed for centuries an algorithm for conducting disputes with opponents, using arguments and counterarguments (including in complete isolation from reality). Otherwise, the site begins srach for any reason, often going very far from the topic under discussion. They say that truth is born in a dispute, but! just not where both sides believe that there are two opinions on the issue under discussion - one of their own, and the second is wrong. Such a dispute is meaningless a priori.
                And I personally liked the name - "Carpool"! fellow What kind of creative people in the Moscow Region are coming up with what to call another model of military equipment.
                I have the honor.
  3. Volga Cossack 10 September 2015 07: 23 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The main thing in these technologies is a cut above the west .........
  4. fider 10 September 2015 07: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Analogue (from other Greek: ἀνάλογος - corresponding, proportionate) - an object (technical solution) of the same purpose, similar in combination of essential features. Often used in conjunction with the concept of a prototype.
    So - today there are analogues in 99.99 cases out of 100. The time for pioneering inventions is long gone.
    1. EGOrkka 10 September 2015 08: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      fider IL
      The time of pioneering inventions is long gone.


      .... well, it's you in vain. There is always time and place .... feat.
  5. Support 10 September 2015 08: 36 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Oh, pulled Russophobian darling ....., I'll see how to spit start .....
  6. Olezhek 10 September 2015 09: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The passive radio intelligence complex Avtobaz-M provides intelligence for pulse and continuous radar signals of both airborne and sea-based objects, as well as signals of the friend-to-others (IFF) and TAC AN identification systems, definition of radar types


    And this is good. EW - an area in which (as I know) the USSR lagged behind a bit.
    Knowing our western friends, we can safely say that this direction is critical for them.
    Having no superiority in the field of radio emission, ONETA will not fly anywhere and float.
    There are no suiciders there.
    It is enough to knock out this brick — and the entire military machine of the West is almost useless.
  7. Rash 10 September 2015 10: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    Among the Nobel laureates of Israel, not a single Russian-speaking.


    Discrimination of native speakers?
    1. Professor 10 September 2015 10: 25 New
      • -6
      • 0
      -6
      Quote: Rash
      Discrimination of native speakers?

      Right The Nobel Committee is buggy. wassat
      Abrikosov, Alexey Alekseevich
      Alferov, Zhores Ivanovich
      Bunin, Ivan Alekseevich
      Ginzburg, Vitaly Lazarevich
      Mechnikov, Ilya Ilyich
      Novoselov, Konstantin Sergeevich
      Pavlov, Ivan Petrovich
      Basov, Nikolai Gennadievich
      Gorbachev, Mikhail Sergeevich
      Kantorovich, Leonid Vitalievich
      Kapitsa, Peter Leonidovich
      Landau, Lev Davidovich
      Pasternak, Boris Leonidovich
      Prokhorov, Alexander Mikhailovich
      Sakharov, Andrei Dmitrievich
      Semenov, Nikolai Nikolaevich
      Solzhenitsyn, Alexander Isaevich
      Tamm, Igor Evgenievich
      Frank, Ilya Mikhailovich
      Cherenkov, Pavel Alekseevich
      Sholokhov, Mikhail Alexandrovich
      1. Ezhaak 10 September 2015 12: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Professor
        Basov, Nikolai Gennadievich
        Gorbachev, Mikhail Sergeevich
        Kantorovich, Leonid Vitalievich
        Kapitsa, Peter Leonidovich
        Landau, Lev Davidovich
        Pasternak, Boris Leonidovich
        Prokhorov, Alexander Mikhailovich
        Sakharov, Andrei Dmitrievich
        Semenov, Nikolai Nikolaevich
        Solzhenitsyn, Alexander Isaevich
        Tamm, Igor Evgenievich

        Well, there are no questions regarding Landau, Solzhenitsyn, but about Gorbachev, Sakharov, more than one question pops up. Would you like to elaborate on your post?
  8. qwert 10 September 2015 11: 11 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: Volga Cossack
    The main thing in these technologies is a cut above the west .........
    excessive computerization of military equipment and saturation of it with any other electronics is the very egg with a needle inside in the US Army which you need to beat.
  9. PQ-18 10 September 2015 11: 53 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Still, install "Field-21E" and no "Tomahawk" can not get you.

    I can roughly imagine HOW "Tomahawk" reaches the target, therefore ....
    DOUBT this overly optimistic ADVERTISING passage!
  10. lordinicus 10 September 2015 13: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    As a person who, at work, has come across radio signal processing, I want to pay attention to such a moment. In addition to antennas and software, computational capabilities for signal processing are also needed.

    In the provided photos there is one rack with a dozen single-server servers, and this is very small for the super-duper complex.

    Okay, suppose that not everyone is on the photo and there are more racks, but the photo of the two cars shows that the rooms are not very large.

    Let's just say this is a machine for providing troops of the brigade level with a maximum range of ten kelometers and the number of escorted targets up to hundreds, or even less. 300 km was amusing, that with the help of these cars you can accompany satellites :). Armless in the west, they will build observation posts for satellites the size of a building :)

    In Israel, such machines are made in the dimensions of one of two hammers, and not two mastodons. In addition, these complexes are trying not to show live because industrial espionage is not asleep. A maximum of prospectuses and booklets, and if you are a serious client you will pay a ticket to Israel and there they will show it live, and even in action.

    If these cars are not a charade then someone very much scammed demonstrating it live.
    1. slavaisrael 10 September 2015 14: 58 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I support. As soon as something electronic spyware is being taken along the road, either in an army container or on a tarpaulin trailer, it’s not a damn thing to determine what it is. Just returned to the office. On the road, a conveyor was transported on a trailer as used for the OSA air defense system, in sandy colors - all in radars, seemingly new. Again somewhere pointed in Syria ?! Something that Russia gave the other day?
    2. IAlex 10 September 2015 15: 20 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Firstly, two Hamers stand as two of these mastodons. Secondly, due to export restrictions on US patents, the Russian Federation even refuses to sell Japanese clock generators and European bluetooth modules with a temperature limit of -45 to +85 degrees that use American patented technologies. Even though these are ordinary consumer items for consumer electronics ... Therefore, we are happy to produce it, i.e. MCU Cortex M3F, SPARC and ELBRUS in factories in China and Zelenograd ...

      T.ch. nor is there anything funny, Israel as an American chain dog can use a lot in contrast to the Russian Federation ...
      1. slavaisrael 10 September 2015 16: 03 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Damn you do not understand - then Israel is a chain dog, then America rulitsya from Israel. Decide. And it will become easier for us.
        And meanwhile. Guys, it's time that the Syrian’s weapon doesn’t really help.
        IS storms Assad's last stronghold in eastern Syria
        The militants of the Islamic State terrorist group are attacking the Syrian Army Air Force Base, located in the vicinity of Dir al-Zur in eastern Syria. The air base is the main stronghold of government troops in the east of the country.

        According to The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, based in London, at least 18 military personnel and 23 jihadists were killed during the fighting. It is also known that militants blew up two mined vehicles at the base gate.

        The capture of the air base will allow the Islamic State to consolidate its possessions in Syria and Iraq, leaving the territory in the west of the country - from Damascus to Latakia - under the control of the Bashar al-Assad regime.

        Recall that on the eve of the Islamist group Jabhat al-Nusra, which was at war with the Islamic State, captured the Ad-Duhur airbase - the last strategic point in the northwestern province of Idlib. The siege of the base by the opponents of the regime lasted four years.
        1. PQ-18 10 September 2015 18: 38 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          "Boom to see," HOW ISIS 'THIS "base capture" will work ...
          The alignment of forces "slightly" has changed ... Russia has openly "entered the business"!
          Iran, too ..
        2. IAlex 11 September 2015 11: 21 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          It helps if the fourth year holds on ... Israel he is in Africa, Israel, you can’t understand it, you are Jews against the Nazis, then for. Either against Hamas terrorists, then they save Hamas. Either Bibi kisses the American ass on a hickey, then he sends them. You yourself then determine what you want ...
  11. IAlex 10 September 2015 14: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Jews continue to rage ...
  12. abc_alex 10 September 2015 15: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Unmatched passive radar system "AvtoBAZ-M" ...

    But what about Mail? wink
    The chain-mail complex consists of three stations. He is able to accurately determine the coordinates of ground and surface targets, their movement routes at a distance of up to 600 km in the depth of the territory and 1000 km along the front, and for air targets flying at an altitude of 10 km - up to 800 km.

    Now, the officials will tell how an American drone in the Islamic state of Iran landed an avalanche-free complex of passive locations Avtobaza-M. I'm going for popcorn. wassat


    Well, firstly, Mail is originally intended for another. Designed by order of the KGB, it is more focused on direction finding of ground targets. And in the air defense of the USSR it was practically not used. Its anti-air use exclusively on the conscience and imagination of Ukrainian manufacturers.
    Secondly, Mail (even M) is not produced. And it is unlikely that the plant where it was created is located on the rebellious territories of Ukraine, is unlikely to be produced, but even before Maidan-2, at least about 8 years, no system left it.
    Thirdly, Professor, you apparently missed the fact that our system nominally gives target designation to the air defense and electronic warfare systems of our production. And here, apparently, it has no analogues, since Ukraine does not produce air defense and electronic warfare systems and it simply has nowhere to integrate Kolchuga.
    1. rosarioagro 10 September 2015 19: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: abc_alex
      Well, firstly, Mail is originally intended for another. Designed by order of the KGB, it is more focused on direction finding of ground targets.

      And what prevents the direction finding of air targets by the radiation of a radio altimeter?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  13. 31rus 10 September 2015 17: 59 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    For the Professor. It has not analoqy in the world.
    1. Professor 10 September 2015 18: 50 New
      • -8
      • 0
      -8
      Quote: 31rus
      For the Professor. It has not analoqy in the world.

      good

      Now find at least one article where Americans spoke so much about their weapons. wink
      1. Falcon5555 10 September 2015 21: 55 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Then "There is no analogue in the world." so that it was like the Americans could respond about their weapons. I googled and found only one article in English ... about the S-500. laughing
  14. Dormidont2 10 September 2015 18: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    found scrap against invisibility)
  15. Nirvanko 12 September 2015 23: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: 31rus
    For the Professor. It has not analoqy in the world.

    good

    Now find at least one article where Americans spoke so much about their weapons. wink


    Yes, everything is simpler there: "the best in the world". Now find me at least one article where the Russians spoke so much about their weapons.