Obama's Middle East slip

Information about the appearance of Russian troops on the Syrian fronts, of course, deserves careful inspection. And it is not only about dubious sources (the press and social networks), but also a difficult foreign policy situation. The flow of migrants who are practically breaking through to Europe every day has once again attracted world attention to the Syrian civil war. Since Europe is not in a hurry to acknowledge its own responsibility for the Middle East catastrophe, the Russians were traditionally assigned the culprits. They say that it is Moscow that supports President Assad and does not allow the war to end - an enchanting logic in its cynicism. Truly, if Russia did not exist, then it would have to be invented, otherwise to whom should we write off all our failures? I immediately recall a curious incident that occurred in the 19th century, when the British justified their defeat in Afghanistan by the presence of fictional Russian Cossacks there.




Russia could not afford to intervene in Syria before the Ukrainian events, much less now. Apparently, the Kremlin is fully aware of this fact. The situation around the Crimea remains unresolved, moreover, there is a considerable threat of a collision with the Ukrainian-Moldovan alliance in the TMR, not to mention instability in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Under these conditions, having a Syrian front is a pleasure, to say the least, dubious.

However, what was so alarmed by US Secretary of State John Kerry, forcing him to immediately contact a Russian colleague? Look at the situation a little more closely ...

August and September 2015 of the year are marked by a significant increase in the volume of assistance to the Syrian government from both Iran and Russia. The Syrian express, which has already become legendary, has earned a brisk pace. Not only the total number of ships carrying cargo to Syrian troops increased, but also their loading - judging by the pictures of Turkish bloggers made in the Bosphorus. Now, in each BDK, the technique is filled not only with internal space, but also tightly force the upper deck. Moreover, the air express was also connected to the maritime express, and so active that the Americans were forced to try to block it first in Greece (unsuccessfully), and then in Bulgaria.



The true cause of anxiety and anger the Americans, apparently, is not that Russia came to Syria, and how she did it. In the United States we planned that will massively against LIH fight Russian infantry. The death of a large number of troops, along with possible terrorist attacks on the territory of the Russian Federation would have to finally shake the internal situation in Russia.

By the way, 8 September Russia recognized the presence in Syria only of its military specialists, who, according to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, train Syrians handling new types of technology. As for the technology itself, its supply especially never hidden. But the troops of President Assad and that is of great strategic help, not to mention the moral effect, which is almost more important. After the Syrian army fighting for more than four years, and it is not hard to guess what a joy it caused a sudden increase in aid.

Facing into the resistance of the government troops, the IS will be forced to look for ways out to the sea coast elsewhere. Since it is suicide to go to Turkey or Israel, there is only one way that is extremely convenient in all respects. These are the monarchies of the Gulf, where, among other things, there is oil, a developed infrastructure. We must not forget that Arabia is the cradle of Islam. In this situation, in a couple of years, the entire Arabian Peninsula will be under the self-proclaimed Caliphate, except perhaps the vast Shiite territories, but Qatar and Bahrain: the first is located on the peninsula, and the second is on the islands. The price of oil will jump to unprecedented heights.

Blitzkrieg in the southern direction for the "Islamic State" is also possible for the reason that the morale of the army of Saudi Arabia is reasonably rated as low. To make sure of this, it is enough to watch the videos of military operations on the border of this country with Yemen, where the Hussites smash the border posts and KSA military bases almost dozens, and the Saudi military in panic run at the first breaks, dropping objects and equipment entrusted to them.



A slightly different option is also possible, providing for the transfer of Assad's troops to a successful offensive. Then, if the IG suffers defeat in Syria and is forced into Iraq, the Islamists will have only one way - to conquer the Middle Eastern monarchies: Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and, possibly, Oman. And the United States and Britain (in the case of Jordan - Israel) will have to defend the allies, not with ostentatious bombardments for television cameras, but with a quite tangible overland presence with all the attendant charms: great losses, expenses and caustic gloating from Iran. By the way, it is Iran that has every chance to get out of geopolitical cataclysms not just not injured, but repeatedly amplified.

Having read all this in the same way as we do now, the Americans realized what they threatened with the strengthening of Russian aid to Damascus, and for this very reason, John Kerry hastily contacted Lavrov and expressed his displeasure. It is understandable, because a new level of Russian intervention threatens to cause a chain reaction of the crumbling of the knuckles of the geopolitical domino, the latter of which has good chances to pin down the entire American strategy in the region. It takes time for the White House to create a new strategy, but it's gone. The Syrian trap slammed shut, leaving most of the players inside. The only question is who will get out of this trap, even if it's tattered, and who will remain in it forever.
Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ovod84 10 September 2015 06: 51 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    wait and see, I think there’s nothing to guess
    1. Jack-b 10 September 2015 06: 58 New
      • 23
      • 0
      +23
      IMHO seems to be true. Ours have always been able to "surprise" in foreign policy, and especially recently. What is only Crimea worth!
      1. mirag2 10 September 2015 07: 19 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        Enchanting! Now I have completely returned to my youth in the early 80s.
        That the USSR was to blame, now the Russian Federation.
        I think the "Cold War veterans" will be in demand again, like the old clichés that ALREADY (Russians are coming !!!) are starting to be thrown into the media space ...
        especially against the background of the recent past, when Russia walking in the wake (even more precisely, in the wake of the jet) of the State Department’s foreign policy was a friend of the states — and now, a step to the left, a step to the right and the first enemy. Moreover, not the USA, no- but all of humanity ...
        1. Russian Uzbek 10 September 2015 07: 43 New
          • 48
          • 0
          +48
          Yes indeed...
          Sometimes anger torments me, why did I need this whole circus with perestroika and the collapse of the country if, after 25 years, they returned to what they left from? good old cold war ...
          Gorbachev-s.s.k. is not too late to pull up
          1. Stelth1985 11 September 2015 04: 31 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            For the collapse of the West not by military means. The USSR did not break up. This is just a global special operation-trap. See you soon.

            For the Honor and Glory of the ancestors!
        2. Aleksandr72 10 September 2015 18: 45 New
          • 17
          • 0
          +17
          Everything is much simpler and more complex at the same time: in the West they never understood and did not like Russians, which is understandable - it seems to be white people (I mean skin color) and should be civilized, be aware and everywhere stick out their superiority over peoples of a different skin color ( and now also tolerant), and the Russians are not like that! Those. from the point of view of the West - wrong whites, not Europeans, but Asians, sir! At first, they did not understand and despise Russians under the tsar’s king (in Europe, I mean), after the October Revolution, Russians (now Soviet) still did not understand, but they were already afraid - who knows what to expect from these “abnormal” ones! After the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, and especially after the Union Bomb appeared in the Union, we also started to hate us - because we survived, did not bend, broke the back of the enemy and rose to spite everyone. Then all the well-known events - a troika rushes across the Union - Mishka, Raika, Perestroika! - the collapse of the USSR, its Sverdlovsk and all-powerful "majesty" EBN on the throne - they stopped hating us (there was nothing to it), they were still afraid (we have a vigorous loaf! am ) and again began to despise (not really hiding it), but at the same time they tried to pull civilization and tolerance to their side (how do we have the resources, and they should become universal, i.e. all-American property, so that "business and nothing personal "). However, 2000 passes, then the crucial year of 2008 - and everything starts to change again, we are still despised (we are not tolerant and homophobic), but we are really afraid (how are the “polite people”, Crimea, Russia-China friendship forever! - and this is really scary for the West and the USA) and yes - they started to hate us again - and this time because in real life they can’t do anything with us, except to go to war - and this is a gut - genetic memory is such a thing - right away on sphincters laughing gives a command!
          Therefore, that Russia is Imperial, that the USSR, that Russia today (and at the same time its closest neighbors and allies) is one and the same for the West and the USA.
          PS Russian in the commentary I call all those who live not only in Russia, but in general on the territory of the former Union, regardless of its nationality, and who at the same time do not want to bend under the States, the West and their rotten values, who consider tolerance a curse, and dancing to the tune of overseas is worse for him than death, for "the dead do not have shame!", and living as a slave is categorically unacceptable. Therefore, I am also Russian, although I am a Tatar and live in Kazakhstan.
          I have the honor.
          1. Stelth1985 11 September 2015 04: 49 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            You are mistaken in one. In the concept of civilization. Civilization has always been in the West. We had - Culture. Civilization leads to death. Culture for development. That is, the first is pure Satanism, the second is the cult of the Gods. Culture is deciphered. Cult Level. That is, those from whom we are our kindred. The rest I agree. I will only add that we are not fighting a united gang of aggressors (USA) and their sixes, but against a third force. The purpose of which is to destroy the nation states on the planet Midgard - Earth. The strategic task of the invaders is to rewrite history again. And that is precisely why national states, united and industrially and intellectually developed, such as the USSR, are their enemies, for they do not allow them to translate their ideas into reality. The fact is that if Russia disappears, the whole Earth will perish. A scribe will come to all 6 billion homosapiens. White and fluffy!
            1. gladcu2 12 September 2015 17: 32 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Stelth1985

              I absolutely agree with you. Not the United States, but the third force is the aggressor. USA, only an unconscious tool. And one hope for Russia. One of the two remaining powerful sovereign states. Russia and China.

              And this third power has a breakthrough in methods and tools. What is worth the action with refugees. You are amazed.

              Someone is nodding and blowing the planet, no kidding.
      2. anokem 10 September 2015 11: 36 New
        • 24
        • 0
        +24
        Alas, the completely idiotic and inexplicably stupid US policy in the Middle East under the Obama administration. Obama confidently overtook Jimmy Carter and took first place in the list of the most mediocre presidents of the United States over the past 100 years ...
        1. fox21h 10 September 2015 11: 55 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: anokem
          Alas, the completely idiotic and inexplicably stupid US policy in the Middle East under the Obama administration. Obama confidently overtook Jimmy Carter and took first place in the list of the most mediocre presidents of the United States over the past 100 years ...

          He’s a good clown, but he’s not attracting more, I thought Bush Jr. got things done, but this pepper even surpassed him with a margin
        2. Andrey Draganov 10 September 2015 18: 04 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Talented presidents have never been there and there will never be one tried, and then they flunked like a mad dog.
          1. anokem 10 September 2015 22: 34 New
            • -1
            • 0
            -1
            Well, it’s you, old man, in a rage ... The same Reagan and Clinton were wonderful presidents, but the one who was executed just did not represent anything ...
    2. fox21h 10 September 2015 11: 20 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Since going to Turkey or Israel is suicide, there is only one way that is extremely convenient in every way

      Go to Turkey? What are you talking about? Turkey is the main partner of the igil, it buys oil, militants come through its territory, it supplies them with money and weapons, now it is creating a buffer zone in Syria (recently invaded there) for the offensive of the igles in Aleppo.
      To summarize the above, only the locals (Syria and Iraq) who these geeks are trying to cut out are fighting the igil, all statements that the USA, Turkey and other complete nonsense are fighting with them, they hold us for idiots.
      1. Weyland 10 September 2015 20: 43 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: fox21h
        Turkey is the main partner of the igil, it buys oil, militants come through its territory, it supplies them with money and weapons


        That's right, but that's why Turks and it is unprofitable that the IG went to the sea and sell oil directly, and not through the Turks! wink And then
        "Leaning against the resistance of government troops, the IS will be forced to seek outlets to the sea coast elsewhere" ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
  2. chikenous59 10 September 2015 07: 04 New
    • -13
    • 0
    -13
    And what did we not help Syria so hard before? Again, the Russian bear was waiting until the last.
    1. Oleg14774 10 September 2015 08: 46 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      Quote: chikenous59
      And what did we not help Syria so hard before? Again, the Russian bear was waiting until the last.

      Not to the last. It was necessary to lure the enemy into a trap. And then it would be useless if he walked around the bush. Do not forget, these militants would then easily send to the North Caucasus, but do we need this? The more they get riveted there, the less they will have a desire to fight.
      1. Kingcobra 11 September 2015 10: 10 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        CCCP also "lured" in avgan, dozamanirovany.
    2. Jack-b 10 September 2015 19: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: chikenous59
      And what did we not help Syria so hard before? Again, the Russian bear was waiting until the last.

      As I understand it, when you say "we," do you ask yourself a question? Therefore, the "Russian bear" is you too?
  3. Alekseev-Orsk 10 September 2015 07: 12 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Great news, I wanted it to be true.
  4. Alekseev-Orsk 10 September 2015 07: 14 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    People tell me how to change the flag in my profile, otherwise I don’t really like the striped-star ...
    1. Kibalchish 10 September 2015 07: 16 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      The flag can only be changed to Soviet. It is generally determined by IP. Are you really from the States, or is the provider quirky?
      1. Jack-b 10 September 2015 19: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Kibalchish
        Are you really from the States, or is the provider quirky?

        Most likely not a provider, but whatever the means of circumventing Roskomnadzor locks working through proxies from the states.
    2. Ivan Slavyanin 10 September 2015 07: 20 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Why did you put it at all?
    3. shultc 10 September 2015 08: 08 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Change your place of residence!
  5. rotmistr60 10 September 2015 07: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And the United States and Britain will have to defend allies (in the case of Jordan, Israel)

    Perhaps that is why this information (about the Russian military and equipment) first appeared in the Israeli media and, it is possible, at the request or agreement with the United States.
    a new level of Russian intervention threatens to trigger a chain reaction of the collapse of the knuckles of geopolitical dominoes, the latter of which has good chances to crush the entire American strategy in the region

    And here everything is logical and fits into the situation in this region.
  6. mig31 10 September 2015 07: 19 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The sunset was "exceptional" in the Middle East party, they thought that they would forever rake in the heat with the wrong hands, but no - Russia has its own party and its own alignment, like Iran, it is "black" in complete crap ....
  7. Ivan Slavyanin 10 September 2015 07: 22 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And it seems to me that the assistance to Syria began to increase after the negotiations between Putin and the Arab princes and kings.
  8. koksalek 10 September 2015 07: 22 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Good situation. In general, I respect our sovereign for the fact that for so many years he has been preventing our soldiers from entering into direct conflicts for any interests skillfully maneuvering among bloodthirsty sharks.
  9. parusnik 10 September 2015 07: 37 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Blitzkrieg on the south for the "Islamic State" is also possible for the reason that the morale of the army of Saudi Arabia is not unreasonably assessed as low.... Dreams, dreams where your sweetness ... ISIS is a fictional American who will march on a pro-American power ... Slippers laughed. ISIS is a more advanced project of Al Qaeda ... invented in the USA to support an unstable situation in the Middle East. . Think for yourself how to look for atomic weapons in Iraq, the moment the coalition gathered ..western .. went in search of ... And with ISIS they chew their snot ..
    1. Weyland 10 September 2015 20: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: parusnik
      ISIS is a fictional American who will march on a pro-American power ...


      1) Bin Laden was also an American extortioner ... wink
      2) The Saudis seem to go out of favor with the owners ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  10. AlNikolaich 10 September 2015 07: 55 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Enchanting nonsense! Naive Western partners hope that if Russia surrenders to Syria, then the war on the BV
    immediately and end? And that the Ishilovites, having seized Syria, are scared? Not enough brains for analysis?
    Let them not be deceived ... If they get stronger in Syria and Iraq, they will increase fat, and one horseradish will trample on.
    And not only on the monarchy of the Persian Gulf, but also in the other direction! And there will be no kilo to everyone!
    And in America, elections will already be held, and another presidential administration will have problems.
    But Obama is a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and not at business!
    1. donavi49 10 September 2015 09: 38 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Patraeus announced the strategy:
      “If we don’t want to send US Marines, we must arm and equip the NUSR, Sunnis, Talibs, AKAP, Marib, SSA and other groups, regardless of their policies and past achievements, the main thing is that they fight with the IS.”

      True, here is the brother of Mullah Omar swore allegiance to the IS the other day, along with a number of field commanders. And Zawahiri (NUSRA, AKAP, MARIB and other al-Qaeda) gave a speech in the style of “We and the IG are mortal enemies, but for the period of Jihad we can unite against infidels and, after victory, find out our contradictions.”
    2. KG_patriot_last 10 September 2015 10: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      IG is built on jihad. They join him in order to kill infidels and build a single Islamic caliphate. They will not stop. Is it possible that their caliph will become so rich that he does not want to lose money and will agree ...
    3. Dmitry Donskoy 10 September 2015 15: 31 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Islamic Caliphate based on Isil. this is a battering ram against Iran and Russia from the south
  11. slavaisrael 10 September 2015 08: 51 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Come on, all of you. It's just that Russia and the USA are always against it - a woman is against it. Everything that Russia does is outrageous in the United States and exactly the opposite. If Russia would not do anything, then the Secretary of State would be indignant at doing nothing. Just politics - nothing personal.
    Well, in order to please the guys from the site, Israel so far is satisfied with the situation that is happening with the neighbors in Syria, as it does not sound cynical, as long as there is confusion and reeling in our hands. And in general, if you now look from the side - we have always maintained that we are not the root of the Middle East problems. The problem of Islam and its contradictions. It's just more convenient to blame us.
    1. V.ic 10 September 2015 13: 59 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: slavaisrael
      we kept saying that we weren’t

      Have you forgotten the comma?
      Quote: slavaisrael
      we are not the root of the Middle East problems.

      The Deir Yassin massacre on April 9, 1948, is it not “you”?
  12. Zaurbek 10 September 2015 09: 06 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Rave. For amers, Syria is one of the local conflicts by proxy, for Russia it is strained. This means they can play long without straining. And in Syria and in Ukraine. God grant that our country would have a margin of safety. There is only one way out, to create similar problems in their (western) chicken coop. In the USA and Europe, then forces and means will be distracted and the influence on our field will weaken.
  13. Anti-ukra 10 September 2015 09: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Good article, very good .... good
  14. aurano 10 September 2015 09: 53 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Terribly like another option. It would be enough insolence.
  15. Nyrobsky 10 September 2015 09: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: AlNikolaich
    And in America, elections will already be held, and another presidential administration will have problems.


    Whoever came to power in America, one cannot hope for an adequate policy of the next administration. Candidates from the Bush and Clinton clans simply change each other - but the policy of confrontation with Russia remains.
    America is the country of SKUNS - it always smells bad and will not become a chamomile field.
  16. sagitch 10 September 2015 10: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It doesn’t seem to be able to denigrate Russia already.

    And the US Department of State must admit this, it is painfully obvious, and even physically for Europe, the consequences of the next failure of the US and NATO policies in Libya, Iran and Syria are felt.
  17. The Chat 10 September 2015 11: 00 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    In the old Soviet cinema (in my opinion, “Shield and Sword”), a fascist scout talks about using traitors for the war against the USSR, “it's like poisoning a hare with a wolf pack, you never know who they will throw ...”
    So ISIS, the Amero-Europeans thought to incite them to Syria (Assad), and for thugs from ISIS, where the enemy is weaker, there is warm meat, so they will rush to where you can easily rob, feast on the bones ...
  18. Alexnder 10 September 2015 11: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, who else of the Western "partners" will say that Russia is not a Great Power ?!
    As soon as we slightly increased help and presence, it became clear that there would be no bathhouse.
  19. Stas157 10 September 2015 11: 49 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Squeezing out of Syria, ISIS in Yemen, so that they fought with the SA, would be the perfect solution! Double profit for Russia and Iran! This is the liberation of Syria and plus the price of oil soars into the sky.
  20. Sargaras 10 September 2015 11: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "Moscow supports President Assad and does not allow the war to end"

    As he put it, the truth is on a different occasion, the character of one foreign film: "I wonder what you smoke there?"
  21. znorick 10 September 2015 12: 16 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Zaurbek
    Rave. For amers, Syria is one of the local conflicts by proxy, for Russia it is strained. This means they can play long without straining. And in Syria and in Ukraine. God grant that our country would have a margin of safety. There is only one way out, to create similar problems in their (western) chicken coop. In the USA and Europe, then forces and means will be distracted and the influence on our field will weaken.

    It’s you, comrade, having a meager understanding of the processes in Syria, drive nonsense. The US brewed porridge there because of Iran’s plans to hold a gas pipeline to Europe through Syria. And this would mean cheap gas for Europe - this is a tangible competitive advantage. The wars in the US BV unleash mainly against the EU, as a very strong economic competitor.
    The war in Syria for the United States is not a local conflict, but a trump card played in a big game. US trump cards are not used to scatter or exchange. Be sure they will stir up the water there to the last.
    Therefore, the step of the Russian leadership for the United States is a kind of bone in the throat. But they use this bone in their own interests. We need to learn propaganda and information operations from the West.
    1. sisa29 10 September 2015 14: 49 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      then if we look at the problem in this light: Have we harnessed to Syria so that Iran could build a gas pipeline and bring down gas prices for us? Where is the logic?
      1. serverny 10 September 2015 16: 16 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        Again the songs of an uneducated villager about the "Iranian pipeline competing with Gazprom."
        No matter how many times you explain that this route is primarily not needed by Iran itself and it is developing all its gas projects in the direction of Pakistan and India - all to no avail.
        1. znorick 10 September 2015 20: 34 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Where can I get to you, you are the most educated city dweller! So maybe you, dear, give a clear explanation of the reasons for the beginning of performances of the so-called opposition in Syria announcing plans to build a gas pipeline to Europe? And why might Iran not need such a route?
        2. znorick 10 September 2015 20: 45 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Note: A tripartite memorandum (Iran, Iraq, Syria) on the construction of a gas pipeline was signed in Iranian Bushehr on 25 on June 2011 of the year. In the same year, I note, the war in Syria also began.
  22. iouris 10 September 2015 16: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What kind of "miss" is the US administration in question? On the contrary, US policy has a long history and perspective and is implemented very clearly. And what can hinder this policy?
  23. Unclean 10 September 2015 16: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yaytsenyuh in my carrot smoked, imagined that he could regulate our flights to Syria. And even control them. I read on the tape ru. Here is an excerpt from the article:
    ... Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk instructed to tighten control over the movement of Russian aircraft through the country's airspace to Syria. On Thursday, September 10, according to RIA Novosti.

    “This morning I ordered UkSATSE to tighten control with Eurocontrol regarding the transfer of any Russian aircraft to Syria. The airspace for these aircraft over the territory of Ukraine is generally closed, the airspace over neutral waters is now being controlled in a special way, ”Yatsenyuk said at a press conference in Bratislava.
    . Yes, the eccentric got a carrot.
  24. Ded176 10 September 2015 16: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Russian Uzbek
    Gorbachev-s.s.k. is not too late to pull up

    For eggs on an aspen.
  25. 123321 10 September 2015 17: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Increased activity of the Syrian Express
    From the beginning of June, one can observe the increased activity of the Syrian Express, delivering goods to the government forces of Syria, conducting heavy and not always successful battles - the frequency of flights of the landing ships of the Russian Navy has almost doubled, the BDK often carry cargo on the upper deck, and in early September the killer ship of the Black Sea Fleet KIL-158 and the civil ferry Alexander Tkachenko joined in the transportation of goods.
  26. 123321 10 September 2015 17: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Chronology of the passage of the Black Sea Straits by the ships of the Russian Navy in 2015:

    05.01.15 "Saratov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    10.01.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Yamal" and "Alexander Shabalin" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    13.01.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    19.01.15 "Saratov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    21.01.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Yamal" and "Alexander Shabalin" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    05.02.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Saratov" and "Alexander Otrakovsky" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.02.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Yamal" and "Alexander Shabalin" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    15.02.15 "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    17.02.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Saratov" and "Alexander Otrakovsky" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    21.02.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Yamal" and "Alexander Shabalin" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    25.02.15 "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    25.02.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Alexander Otrakovsky" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.03.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Alexander Otrakovsky" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    08.03.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Shabalin" and "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    17.03.15 "Azov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    19.03.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Shabalin" and "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    24.03.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    29.03.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    08.04.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    17.04.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Alexander Shabalin" - to the Mediterranean Sea.
  27. 123321 10 September 2015 17: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    28.04.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Alexander Shabalin" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 04.15 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 05.15 “Novocherkassk” - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    12.05.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 05.15 “Alexander Otrakovsky” and “Alexander Shabalin” - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    20.05.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    23.05.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Alexander Shabalin" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    26.05.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    30.05.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Novocherkassk" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    01.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Alexander Shabalin" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 06.15 "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Novocherkassk" and "Caesar Kunikov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    12.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    16.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    18.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Novocherkassk" and "Caesar Kunikov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    22.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Korolev" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    24.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    24.06.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Caesar Kunikov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    03.07.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Alexander Otrakovsky" and "Korolev" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 07.15 “Nikolay Filchenkov” - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    10.07.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    15.07.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 07.15 “Korolev” - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 07.15 “Nikolay Filchenkov” - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    29.07.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    31.07.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Caesar Kunikov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" and "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    08.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Caesar Kunikov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    16.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" and "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    19.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Caesar Kunikov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    20.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    ??. 08.15 “Korolev” and “Novocherkassk” - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    26.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Azov" and "Caesar Kunikov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    31.08.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Nikolai Filchenkov" - from the Mediterranean Sea.

    03.09.15/XNUMX/XNUMX "Korolev" and "Novocherkassk" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    07.09.15 "Saratov" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    08.09.15/158/XNUMX "KIL" - to the Mediterranean Sea.

    BDK Russian Navy in Tartus:
  28. 1536 10 September 2015 19: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is impossible for us without Syria. And anxious Americans can be advised to drink a sedative, and save nerves. Fell into hysteria, like a pregnant schoolgirl. They were warned not to go into Syria.
  29. 123321 10 September 2015 19: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Congratulations, Operation Werfen Osten 2015 has begun!
    http://cyplive.com/ru/news/pozdravlyayu-operaciya-werfen-osten-2015-nachalas.htm
    l
  30. Vasisualiy 10 September 2015 21: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Now it is quite timely to throw modern technology into the Donbass. Officially.
  31. doktorlarisa 11 September 2015 00: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It’s good that we keep this direction, where else to shatter this region
  32. Ze Kot 11 September 2015 00: 40 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Navy missile firing near Syria begins. Cover a piece of the sea and heights of up to 20 km near Syria. Obviously something is plotting on these dates.
  33. Termit1309 11 September 2015 02: 55 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Now Mistral would be very useful sad How many vehicles can be loaded on them what Maybe this is the true cause of the French scam? Syria?
  34. Reader 11 September 2015 11: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Definitely not. The mains to the Mediterranean? What for? This is not a barge sub equipment.