Military Review

The National Interest: Yak-130 - “a little horror that NATO should be afraid of”

65
American edition The National Interest stated that American experts call the Russian combat training multipurpose fighter Yak-130 "a little horror that NATO should be afraid of," reports "Russian newspaper".



And, as noted in the material, this statement is based on real facts: under each wing of the Russian aircraft there are three suspension points, allowing it to be equipped with three tons of different weapons, including air-to-surface, air-to-air missiles, free-fall bombs, precision-guided bombs, cannon containers, unguided rockets, and outboard fuel tanks.

In addition, an 130-mm cannon can be mounted under the Yak-23 fuselage, and there are two suspension points for air-to-air missiles at the ends of the wings.

The weight of a fully equipped and fueled fighter is 10 300 kg, which is a little more than half the maximum take-off weight of the F-16 - the main multipurpose fighter of the US Air Force and most American allies.

Currently, the Yak-130 combat training fighters are in service with the Algerian Air Force, and contracts have been signed for their delivery to Belarus and Bangladesh.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
65 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prabiz
    prabiz 9 September 2015 10: 23
    +29
    We have a BIG HORROR for the Americans!
    1. just exp
      just exp 9 September 2015 10: 24
      +4
      that's for sure, if the Yak-130 is horror, then what is PAK FA, Yars and Iskander.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. oleg-gr
        oleg-gr 9 September 2015 10: 26
        +6
        No wonder our Governor was called Satan.
        1. marlin1203
          marlin1203 9 September 2015 10: 33
          +67
          And the biggest horror is that a cadet is at the helm! .. laughing
          1. tol100v
            tol100v 9 September 2015 10: 48
            +8
            Quote: marlin1203
            And the biggest horror is that a cadet is at the helm! ..

            And for cadets - a great school desk! Do you want a fighter, do you want a fighter!
          2. samoletil18
            samoletil18 9 September 2015 11: 02
            +6
            Quote: marlin1203
            And the biggest horror is that a cadet is at the helm! .. laughing

            Yeah. They read Suvorov (rezun), and realized that he was the "winged jackal" who would bury them, like the "Nakajima" and "Zero" fleet in Pearl Harbor. We need to give the cutters the idea that any container ship or dry cargo ship is equipped with an elevator and a take-off deck with a springboard in a week, and one hundred thousand graduates of aero clubs at the helm of the Yak-130 will turn the United States into a parched land with burning skeletons of Abrams and accordion factories. And on each trolley ... sorry, the plane will be written: "at the wheel of a cadet." wassat
            It is strange that they are not afraid of the fact that Russia has something to teach its pilots.
            1. Darkmor
              Darkmor 9 September 2015 11: 48
              +6
              Well, they are not afraid of the aircraft itself, but of the fact that it can easily be converted from training to combat. This allows you to circumvent many restrictions on the supply of weapons, and it is more difficult to predict the forces of opponents who have such aircraft in the park.

              In principle, even a civilian can buy it - naturally, without a weapon. But weapons suspension can be obtained in a roundabout way on the black market, or even bungled independently (for example, a bomb). Those. A potential terrorist somewhere in Europe may have a combat aircraft with homing missiles within a radius of approach to any capital.
              P.S. I would have bought one for myself if I hadn’t lived in Russia, where the rules of flight for civil aviation are full of plague.
              1. your1970
                your1970 9 September 2015 12: 42
                +1
                with flight rules for civil aviation - a complete plague all over the world (well, except for very, very African countries). And so everywhere you need permission to receive, notify dispatchers, do not fly in closed areas, etc.
            2. gjv
              gjv 9 September 2015 12: 03
              +1
              Quote: samoletil18
              It is necessary for the cutters to throw an idea

              Andrey, write a book yourself, it will turn out ...
              Trolleybuses - a fountain of delight, memories of cadets and (mostly) cadets ...
              1. samoletil18
                samoletil18 9 September 2015 14: 32
                +1
                Interesting fact. In the USSR there were freight tleibuses. And, in general, the potential of the horned friends of large and not very cities has not been studied and used. And the cadets of trolleybus schools were sometimes unusually attractive ... (or their hostel?).
                Thank you for your kind word, GIV.
      3. veksha50
        veksha50 9 September 2015 10: 41
        +1
        Quote: just explo
        that's for sure, if the Yak-130 is horror, then what is PAK FA, Yars and Iskander.



        Each vegetable and fruit has its own place in the garden ... As they say - it’s small, but smart ... And it’s unpretentious ... There are many operations in which the use of heavy machines is simply excessive ... And this one - jumped out from the corner, gave in the face, - and again hid ...
        1. silver_roman
          silver_roman 9 September 2015 10: 51
          +21
          Bullshit ... so that the Yak-130 can be used in the BV, you need to do a lot of work oooooooo. in fact it’s generally a glider! I don’t understand the rapture ... the news is about nothing! another knocking out the dough from Gongres if the article is real
          This is not a combat aircraft, but a training one. In order to adapt it at least for assault missions, it is necessary to strengthen the hull with armor, put a lot of electronics: BSU, radars, etc.
          Let's really look at things, not DRAW!
          It’s a pity there is no SSI or VAFa ... so we’ll plunge into non-competence! fool
          1. Black Colonel
            Black Colonel 9 September 2015 11: 18
            0
            Sorry no SSI or VAFa
            VAF is, only he is under a different nickname. He considers it necessary, will inform you in PM. hi
            1. silver_roman
              silver_roman 9 September 2015 11: 40
              0
              Already considered, and you shoot the office laughing
              meant no in reviews of this article! hi
          2. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 9 September 2015 11: 31
            +1
            Quote: silver_roman
            Let's really look at things, not DRAW!

            good The Pendos' accolades about our economic successes and "unrivaled" achievements have already set the teeth on edge. It's dull like that. hi
          3. aleks 62 next
            aleks 62 next 9 September 2015 13: 29
            +3
            ..... Nonsense ... so that the Yak-130 could be used in the BV, ....

            .... And what is the question ???? .... It is possible to use the An-2 (in Vietnam it was the case) .... In general, this is a platform that allows you to carry quite serious weapons (3 tons, for comparison, Su- 25 -4 tons), which is generally not bad ... For shooting from a cannon you need a sight, and there it is, to throw bombs - not all planes have a bomb sight, they throw in the old way - by eye (using marker lines on the fusel (like on IL-2), the accuracy is really low, but within reasonable limits .... But if you take it more seriously, then put a laser rangefinder for firing NUR - there is also a place (there was infa about such a refinement) .... Armor by the way there is only on specialized attack aircraft (Su-25, A-10), the rest cost armored backs ... lol
      4. Now we are free
        Now we are free 9 September 2015 10: 57
        +17
        With all due respect to our weapons in general, and to the classy and timely appearance of the Yak-130 UBS in our Air Force.

        ??? The National Interest will soon be horrified that we have a MACROV PISTOL! Therefore, an urgent need to lay down two more, or better three, aircraft carriers of the Gerald Ford class. Hysteria can no longer be traced with an unaided eye and it is designed for one, to provide orders for the US defense industry + to force US satellites and NATO members to buy weapons produced by you know where, in order to counter the "terrible Russian threat".
        1. mark1
          mark1 9 September 2015 11: 18
          +5
          Quote: Now we are free
          ??? The National Interest will soon be horrified that we have a MACRO GUN! Therefore, it is urgent to lay two more, and preferably three, aircraft carriers of the Gerald Ford class.

          And Russians still fly AN-2 - terrible stealth biplanes, we urgently need a fourth missile defense area in Ukraine!
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. Lenin
        Lenin 9 September 2015 11: 38
        0
        Well, if about planes, then don't forget the missile carriers. What a terrible name "White Swan".
      7. Lukich
        Lukich 9 September 2015 12: 59
        +2
        IG, the right sector. Well and further down the list. find a lot of poop. will make it our very secret ...
      8. smershxnumx
        smershxnumx 9 September 2015 13: 20
        0
        Small bug - yes stinky !!! laughing
      9. The comment was deleted.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2015 10: 44
      +2
      “A little horror that NATO should be afraid of”
      The weight of a fully equipped and refueled fighter is 10 300 kg, and this is a little more than half maximum take-off weight of the F-16 - the main multi-role fighter of the US Air Force and most American allies.
      really, "uzhosnyh" ... NATO members are hastily submitting their resignation. The author is a schoolboy? what
    3. Pacifist
      Pacifist 9 September 2015 10: 48
      +1
      The greatest horror for them is people. People who see the real state of affairs and are capable of critical and analytical thinking. If it is, then worse than this weapon does not exist.
    4. Ruslan
      Ruslan 9 September 2015 10: 48
      0
      Yak-130 has one problem, there is no supersonic engine. and were not able to deliver. can somehow make a supersonic version. and so the car class and it looks very beautiful and predatory.
      1. Black Colonel
        Black Colonel 9 September 2015 11: 23
        +5
        Does training aircraft really need supersonic? On the Su-25 it is not, and nothing. Each has its own task, and the task has its own performance characteristics. That which can also fill up letaka is good, missiles allow. And for this you need the appropriate avionics.
        1. Ruslan
          Ruslan 9 September 2015 11: 39
          0
          Well, it seems to me that it will not be harmful to young pilots to feel supersonic while still on a training aircraft with all the consequences.
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 9 September 2015 11: 55
        0
        Quote: ruslan
        Yak-130 has one problem, there is no supersonic engine. and were not able to deliver. can somehow make a supersonic version. and so the car class and it looks very beautiful and predatory.

        then with the alteration of the glider, it will not be Yak-130 ...
        1. Lt. Air Force stock
          Lt. Air Force stock 9 September 2015 12: 00
          +1
          It is not clear what horror? The Yak-130 is a combat training subsonic aircraft that can perform the functions of an attack aircraft; the Su-25, which has armor of important components and a large combat load, should inspire much more fear.
    5. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 9 September 2015 12: 48
      0
      Quote: prabiz
      We have a BIG HORROR for the Americans!


      They have their own great horrors for themselves, it is they themselves.
  2. 79807420129
    79807420129 9 September 2015 10: 24
    +8
    A lot of things have to scare NATO.
    1. just exp
      just exp 9 September 2015 10: 25
      +10
      but the article is lobbying, paid by American manufacturers of toilet paper.
  3. Old26
    Old26 9 September 2015 10: 26
    +16
    Lord! Well, how did they GET these articles from the media, about the "horror" for the Americans, about the "fear" of the Americans, and so on. Damn, look how many such machines Italy has stamped ... But there is no "little horror for NATO". And the fact that NATO has this horror is nothing?
    1. Penetrator
      Penetrator 9 September 2015 10: 35
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      Lord! Damn, look how many such machines Italy has stamped ... But there is no "little horror for NATO". And the fact that NATO has this horror is nothing?

      I'll tell you more: look how many similar machines China has stamped - you will be very surprised. And the fact that NATO has a similar "horror", so Russia has the best air defense in the world. I hope you won't dispute the potential of our air defense?
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 9 September 2015 11: 34
        +1
        Quote: Penetrator
        so Russia has the best air defense in the world. I hope you will not dispute the potential of our air defense?

        Quality or quantity? wink
    2. Scoun
      Scoun 9 September 2015 11: 14
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      Well, how did they GET these articles from the media, about "horror" for Americans

      Yes, many authors love expressions that are more juicy)) but in fact the Yak-130 is a so-called "unaccounted for", that is, the aircraft seems to be a combat training and let's say someone considering the LDP did not take into account the presence of these machines, considered it possible to carry out this or that operation with the expectation that the Su-24 or Su-25 will not arrive ..... and then "desks" arrive and dump out such contents ..... (IMHA)
      Well, the articles themselves are trying to paint colorfully))) "I am horror flying on the wings of the night")))) and the whole point is here-
      under each wing of a Russian aircraft there are three suspension points, allowing you to equip it with three tons of different weapons

      Well, to note separately)) I’m glad that it’s not our journalists who painted such epithets laughing
      GC
      In general, it’s better to go to the source site .. and it’s written in more detail .. what is worth at least this excerpt ...
      But today's multi-role combat trainers are a viable and comparatively low-cost alternative to conventional fighters 

      and the photo is different there.
      [img] http://www.nationalinterest.org/files/styles/main_image_on_posts/public/mai
      n_images / Yak-130 _-_ FIA_2012.jpg? itok = nswRuJJv [/ img]
      1. Scoun
        Scoun 9 September 2015 11: 22
        +2
        Here is a photo from the article and here is a link to
        blog / blogger article))
        http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-lethal-yak-130-fighter-the

        -tiny-terror-nato-should-13782
  4. pavelty
    pavelty 9 September 2015 10: 26
    0
    Still, the aircraft is mainly training, it can solve some other problems, but is poorly protected and there is no radar ... so far
    And so, of course, chic)
  5. Altona
    Altona 9 September 2015 10: 26
    +1
    Sat sat, now began to escalate hysteria. As if the Yak-130 appeared today, arose from nowhere overnight.
  6. Arh
    Arh 9 September 2015 10: 28
    +1
    Yes, "Yak-130" turned out !!! good
  7. atamankko
    atamankko 9 September 2015 10: 32
    0
    GOOD PLANE, SMALL YES DELETED.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 9 September 2015 10: 32
    +2
    American experts call the Russian combat training multipurpose fighter Yak-130 “a little horror that NATO should be afraid of

    In order to maintain the opinion about the significance of NATO in modern conditions, there will be many more "horrors".
  9. midashko
    midashko 9 September 2015 10: 42
    +2
    Attachment points are good. And what about the detection, guidance, control, navigation, communication means? It seems he can carry out small tasks, well, there he’ll drop a bomb in a cannon, bombard a post unit, transfer drugs. What else is he capable of?
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 9 September 2015 13: 02
      +1
      This is a training aircraft, for the Russian Air Force they don’t even supply it with an abdominal cannon container (or supply it directly to the warehouse). For it is not necessary.

      Its combat use will be identical to that of the L-39, if it is pressed very hard, something can be dropped somewhere or even with NARS can be fired. However, why is this necessary with the live Su-25?

      Yak is working on the LTS project for one foreign customer, most likely starting with A and ending with R. The bottom line is:
      - structural reinforcement
      - a container for providing surveillance and guidance, now it is completely blind
      - Finalization of avionics for the use of guided weapons (AS, maybe there will be some missiles, but AS will be)
  10. SPACE59
    SPACE59 9 September 2015 10: 43
    +2
    We never see a similar article about Amer’s weapons. For what purpose are they trying about the terrible weapons of Russia, which in fact are not (talk about this article)? demonize us! And we are so pleased that our weapons delight them!
  11. silver_roman
    silver_roman 9 September 2015 10: 47
    +3
    cram under the wing 3 tons of missiles is not a tricky thing. but there is on the YAK-130 FAR / AFAR, BIUS, etc. to successfully use these 3 tons of weapons? Or again NURSY work?
  12. Thirsty for wind
    Thirsty for wind 9 September 2015 10: 48
    0
    An excellent product. Organically filled the "empty niches". A working bee, but if suddenly, it can bite.
  13. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
    Andrei from Chelyabinsk 9 September 2015 10: 49
    +8
    Gentlemen from NATO solve their personal problems - I want money, I want financing, and in general there are more babosiks laughing
    Under this guise, they are not like the Yak-130, they are a kite launched by seven-year-old tomboy outside the village of Gadyukino, the ubervunderwaffe will be announced. Well, what kind of "horror" of Yak ?! This is NOT a combat aircraft, this is a training aircraft that can theoretically be used in the course of hostilities - but of extremely low intensity, against gangs armed with small arms (if there is a MANPADS, it is no longer worth it). And in a serious turmoil and against a serious adversary, the Yaki-130 will fall off with sakura petals.
    Therefore, the enthusiasm "ah, what a formidable kid, Russian superweapon, all NATO drank from fear, oh, look, he has three pendants under his wing, what a lovely mimimi" - she ... how polite it would be ... not from a great mind, Alas.
  14. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 9 September 2015 10: 49
    +2
    He is cheap, quite capable of himself, and there will be many of them. It is clear that the radar with AFAR will not hurt him, but who knows if there is such a version in the development. You won’t use supersonic in aerial combat, but missiles do not care which platform to launch from - PAK FA or Yak-130. in the Second World War and Po-2 fought, and found a battle niche.
  15. Wedmak
    Wedmak 9 September 2015 10: 52
    -1
    Why are they so timid everyone there. And they apparently still do not know about the integration of the nose of the optical sight, which turns this kid into a light attack aircraft. Maybe they really are sitting on some grass there. Total fear.
  16. kil 31
    kil 31 9 September 2015 10: 58
    +5
    We still have one. "Night witches" can fly as many bombs as they can fit into the cockpit. wink
  17. Ivan Tucha
    Ivan Tucha 9 September 2015 11: 05
    0
    "Ishachok" of the 21st century smile
  18. aromatologist
    aromatologist 9 September 2015 11: 18
    +2
    Yes! A good combat training, but he does not pose any major threat: firstly, he is UB and that’s it; secondly, they are in service with all 10 sides in Russia at least for now, and even less work. All these gentlemen from NATO rod only because it is necessary to inflate the military budget. Andryukha from Chelyabinsk is right.
  19. roskot
    roskot 9 September 2015 11: 22
    0
    Not only the Yak-130 is terrible. Here and on the road, any student will be terrified.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. Mera joota
    Mera joota 9 September 2015 11: 22
    +2
    Stupid news that only a complete nerd can take seriously. It is possible to be afraid of a training aircraft only if it is controlled by a kamikaze, there are no other options.
    PS: Personally, I prefer to be respected, smiling at the meeting, saying hello and raising my hat. If others scatter from me in horror, then it will be more than unpleasant for me, therefore the joy of the patriots from the realization that someone is afraid of them is incomprehensible. This is something clinical or complexes ...
  22. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 9 September 2015 11: 29
    +3
    Article exists! In English like this:
    Russia's Lethal Yak-130 Fighter: The Tiny Terror NATO Should Fear

    And equipped with such an impressive photo:
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 9 September 2015 13: 05
      +1
      Nothing impressive. This is a demonstrator of Yak with mock-ups and 2 PTB. They could not even pick up a terrible photo. That would be much more inspired for 4 KABA is power wink . Although also a demonstrator and not even for use in the study of flight qualities.
  23. Izotovp
    Izotovp 9 September 2015 11: 31
    +1
    And then we should be afraid that they have a full copy of the Yak-130? Italian M-346.
  24. iouris
    iouris 9 September 2015 11: 35
    0
    It remains only to install a siren on it.
    As far as I understand, there are possible problems with import substitution.
  25. imugn
    imugn 9 September 2015 11: 40
    0
    People are scared, money begs
  26. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 9 September 2015 11: 59
    +1
    Quote: Izotovp
    And then we should be afraid that they have a full copy of the Yak-130? Italian M-346.

    Yes, we should not be afraid of anyone. There is no point. And so the whole "advanced world" is against us, how much more?
    As in that joke: "And where are we going to bury you all?"
  27. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 9 September 2015 13: 04
    0
    The airplane is really interesting. And it looks beautiful.
  28. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 9 September 2015 13: 19
    +2
    Quote: just explo
    then what is PAK FA, Yars and Iskander.
    Complete and final! P.I.P.E.Ts.!
  29. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 9 September 2015 13: 31
    0
    I think that with the transition to the 5th generation, 60% of countries will not have money for it. For 20 years they will fly at 4m, then they will be forced to switch to such universal aircraft. And they will not be able to resist the "Big" countries, but they will fight each other on such planes.
  30. den3080
    den3080 9 September 2015 14: 04
    +1
    Gentlemen from NATO solve their personal problems - I want money, I want financing, and generally more babosiks.
    Under this mute, they are not like the Yak-130, they are flying a kite launched by seven-year-old tomboys outside the village of Gadyukino, the Uberwunderwaffe will be announced.

    By the way, all "positive" articles about Russia published in the West should be regarded as propaganda - intimidation of its own population in order to justify the insane actions of the Western establishment or a kind of "target designation".

    Bloomberg announced a couple of days ago that Russian oil companies are the most efficient in the world in terms of margin, efficiency, etc.
    It seems ... wow, what are we (Russia). But in fact, Bloomberg simply says publicly: You gentlemen have forgotten this point of growth in Russia. There you have to beat, spread rot, so that Russia quickly bent.

    For in terms of profit and efficiency, from the sale and production of oil, respectively, nothing and no one can yet be compared with the Gulf countries, yet.
    This horse is understandable and a no brainer.
  31. samoletil18
    samoletil18 9 September 2015 14: 52
    0
    I was very pleased with the critical look by the insistence in many comments. I will add that they indicate with this article the root of our aviation - the training of pilots.
    1. AlNikolaich
      AlNikolaich 9 September 2015 19: 54
      0
      Quote: samoletil18
      I was very pleased with the critical look by the insistence in many comments. I will add that they indicate with this article the root of our aviation - the training of pilots.

      Well, I didn’t see the Yak-130 in the sky ... But in the Falcon, Ka-226, Ansat-u and
      Mi-8. Syzran cadets study almost every day! In Balashov continues flights on Anah
      UAP military transport aviation. They practice take-off and landing in any weather conditions.
      By the way, an unexpectedly big competition for admission to the Civil Air Force School in Krasnoy Kut.
      But the Bears and Swans from Engels, something is not visible and not heard ...
  32. ingenera
    ingenera 9 September 2015 17: 46
    0
    Touches the range of American publications about our technology from "oh, I'm afraid, I'm afraid" to complete blame for our achievements. Apparently, the truth is somewhere in between. But we have something to be proud of.
  33. Old26
    Old26 9 September 2015 22: 36
    0
    Quote: Penetrator
    I'll tell you more: look how many similar machines China has stamped - you will be very surprised. And the fact that NATO has a similar "horror", so Russia has the best air defense in the world. I hope you won't dispute the potential of our air defense?


    It's not about China and our air defense. It’s just that the Yak-130 was created jointly with the Italians, since it took a lot of money to develop a new aircraft, which neither the developers nor the Russian Ministry of Defense had. Due to disagreements with the Italian partner, the joint development of the Yak-130 at the final stage stopped. Aermacchi received all the design and technical documentation for the airframe, and then released its own training aircraft - M-346.

    И issue plus option about the same as ours.
    As for the combat option, the Yak-131 was being developed at one time, but the Russian Air Force abandoned it, since the weapons and combat load of the Yak-130 were suitable for the tasks of a light combat aircraft, but the pilot's defense was insufficient.
    In general, NATO has exactly the same "little horror". But it can only be used against an enemy with weak air defense. Israel EMNIP has ordered 30 or 40 of these machines. They may use it as a light attack aircraft.