Military Review

On the prospect of drawing Russia into a big war in the Middle East

50
On the prospect of drawing Russia into a big war in the Middle East

The Middle East remains the main front on the planet of world war: in the strip from North Africa to the borders of Turkey and Iran. Another front of world war was designated along the line West-East ("Ukrainian Front"). Here, a Western-led coup in Ukraine led to the inclusion of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and anti-Russian sanctions. In eastern Ukraine (Little Russia), a civil war has begun between Russians and Russians, who are zombied to the state of "Ukrainians" or simply fighting for duty or for money. Kiev supports Berlin, Brussels, Washington and the NATO bloc, and the militia supports the "north wind" from Russia.


From the main front of the world war, the world community is distracted by various information "noise". The next war games on the Korean Peninsula. The Asia-Pacific region is likely to be another front of world war, but this is still far away. The problem of refugees from the countries of the South and to Europe. However, this problem is only a consequence and an echo of the great war unleashed in the Middle East. Its solution is impossible without the elimination of the center of world war in the Middle East. Iran's nuclear program and other information peels.

In the Middle East there is a confrontation along two main lines. First, inside the Islamic civilization. Here there are three main forces:

1) “Black” Islam is a radical Islam that represents “Islamic State” (the germ of the “Caliphate” project). It was created by Western political consultants. In fact, "Caliphate" became a tool to incite the Fourth World War (The Third World War is the “cold war”, which ended with the death of Soviet civilization and the collapse of “Great Russia”). The new world war should, according to the plan of the owners of the western project (Western civilization), end with the death of the civilizations of the states - Russia, China, possibly India, the complete destruction and transformation of the Islamic world and the fundamental change of Europe. "Caliphate" in this war plays the role of the Third Reich. In essence, the “Islamic State” is the “Hitler” project at a new stage in the development of the world stories. “Black” Islam, on the one hand, is destructive, archaic in nature, since it cannot lead humanity to the “Kingdom of Justice”, the victory of the ethics of conscience and the society of creation and service, leading to war, chaos and destruction. On the other hand, Islam has a core of justice, it challenges the lack of spirituality and the worldview of materialism, so the “Caliphate” is popular not only in the Islamic world, but also in Europe mired in debauchery and spiritual and physical degradation. And many young people, Germans, French, British, Slavs, in whom there is a spark of spirituality, a dream, fall for this bait.

2) Secular Islam (“red” Islam), with a predominance of the ideology of nationalism and socialism. These are the remnants of the statehood of Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Algeria and a number of other countries. In general, these countries have been sentenced by supranational forces (the masters of the West, the world backstage, the "golden elite", etc.) to extermination. All the secular states of the Islamic world are going to crush, absorb the most valuable assets, “dispose” of the population, partly push it out to Europe to cause a surge of Nazism and finish off the white race. Iran can be attributed to the same camp, although it is a theocracy, but the ideology of nationalism and Islamic socialism is also present in Iran.

3) The third force is the Arab monarchies headed by Saudi Arabia. Arab monarchies took part in the creation of the “Islamic State”, hoping to destroy their competitors - the secular states, and to realize their “Caliphate” project, with huge information, financial and natural resources. With the possibility of obtaining nuclear weapons through Pakistan and the most modern weapons purchased from the United States in Europe and Russia. With its regional currency. However, the plans of the owners of the West go further - the Arab monarchies are outdated and must also leave the world arena, they have fulfilled their role. Moor did his job, moor can leave. With the help of the Arab monarchies, Iraq, Libya, Syria were destroyed, they invaded Yemen. True, realizing that they are also in the position of the victim, the Arab elites were alarmed, temporarily pulled Egypt out of the crisis, giving it financial resources to stabilize the internal situation and armaments. Also, Egypt, which became an ally and the main military force of the monarchies and the Arab monarchies, began to actively flirt with Moscow, trying to use the resources of Russia to get out of the inferno pit, which they themselves actively dug. But in perspective, the Arab monarchies are doomed. They have exhausted their time. By taking part in the creation of a network monster ISIS, getting involved in the war in Syria and Yemen, they signed a death warrant.

The second main line of confrontation: South - North, the Islamic world and the western "Babylon". The masters of the West created the “Caliphate” to finish off the white race, destroy the old European, Christianity-based civilization, and crush the nation states of the Old World. At the same time, there is a scenario that the war and the new migration of peoples will lead to the victory of neo-Nazism in Europe, the “Fourth Reich”. However, the Fourth Reich, apparently, will not be able to withstand the wave from the South and the internal destructive tendencies. Europeans in their mass morally degraded to "vegetables", there are almost no fighters, and demography does not give Europe chances for success. Perhaps the future of Europe is ultramodern ghettos (this is shown in science fiction films), which will try to isolate themselves from the rest of the territory, which will plunge into the darkness of archaism, neo-slaveholding and neo-feudal relations. Some of the former prosperous countries are already in this “dark ages” world. For example, Libya, where there are tribal territories and territories that control various large gangs, including those who consider themselves legitimate.

The third line of confrontation could be Russia's active participation in the fight against the “Caliphate”. No wonder the information space is actively pumping information that Russia sharply intensified its participation in the Syrian war. According to official data, Moscow has increased the supply of weapons to Damascus. According to unofficial Russia, it intends to build a military air base in Syria, supporting the Syrian army from the air and even send an expeditionary force to that country. Such rumors are spreading regularly, but this period of their activation is clearly aimed at getting Russia into a Syrian conflict with the head.

On the one hand, Moscow’s clear participation in the Syrian conflict has its advantages. Firstly, the “Caliphate” project is a worldwide threat. And network terrorism with the activation of Islamism (Wahhabism, jihadism) with elements of nationalist separatism in the Muslim regions is a terrible threat for Moscow and the entire Russian civilization. At the same time, the internal destabilization of Russia will be accompanied by, or will begin with the destabilization of Central Asia. The situation is especially dangerous in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, where the first bells have already rung. And Turkmenistan is extremely weak.

The Syrian and Iraqi armies, and other local forces, are not able to cope with the project “Caliphate” independently. The participation of Iran saved the secular regimes of Iraq and Syria from complete defeat, but the situation is grave. Iran cannot provide more explicit assistance, as it is constrained by the United States and the Arab monarchies. The US and its allies are officially fighting the “Islamic State”, but in fact support the “Caliphate” project through various unofficial channels and causing hatred of the local population with their “accurate” air attacks. Turkey actually supports the terrorists by creating a logistics base on its territory for Syrian militias, and attacking Kurds fighting the Islamic State.

Secondly, Russia can strengthen (actually restore) its position in the Mediterranean, in the Middle East and in the Islamic world. Thanks to their actions (mass slaughter, slave trade, rape, removal of organs from people, destruction of monuments of world history, etc.), jihadists are perceived as an absolute evil in the world. In essence, ISIS is the “collective Hitler.” Therefore, in the eyes of the world community, Russia can become a “liberator”, a redeemer of the world from the threat of an “Islamic state”. At the same time, Russia can strengthen its positions in Syria, Iraq, Egypt and other countries of the Islamic and Arab world, and will receive political and economic dividends, including from the sale of weapons.

However, on the other hand, Russia's direct intervention in the war in the Middle East has so many drawbacks that they outweigh the advantages. First, Russia is not ready for such a war. The main role is played by the country's internal readiness for war, the mobilization of all resources from ideology to the economy. Thus, the Soviet Union was ready for World War II thanks to internal spiritual unity, the creation of a society of creation and service, where the total is higher than private, the rapid development of science and technology, industrialization and collectivization, and the comprehensive preparation of the Military Industrial Complex and the army.

This is not the case in the Russian Federation. There is no spiritual and ideological unity. Society is divided into Christians, Muslims, Neopagans, atheists, admirers of all kinds of sects, etc. For monarchists, liberals, democrats, communists, socialists, nationalists (including provincials), etc. For rich and poor, for "successful" and "Losers". Young people were taken to dozens of different subcultures with Western roots. Bikers are the personification of state patriotism, that is, a typical Western subculture that has grown up on Western associations of marginal, bandit type. Society has a real kaleidoscope in their heads. A mixture of remnants of Soviet education, the upcoming religious archaic, and the victorious Western postmodernism. To what all this leads, we can see the example of Ukraine (Little Russia), a large fragment of the Russian civilization, where the Russians have already been strained with the Russians.

We have a consumer society. Westerners dominate the Russian elite, for whom London and Paris are closer than Ryazan and Novgorod. Science and education, thanks to Western "vaccinations" and the domination of Western-liberals in this sphere, is in decline. Finance under the control of Western liberals, that is, the West. The industry is in crisis, in technological dependence on the West and the East. Positive advances are noticeable only in the armed forces and the military industrial complex.

Thus, the Russian Federation is not ready for a big war. Modern Russia is more like the Russian Empire of the 1913 model of the year than the Stalinist USSR 1939 of the year. Participation in a big war is most likely a death sentence for Russia, perhaps for the entire Russian civilization, which simply will not have the strength and ability to recover from the ashes. To be ready for a big war, an internal transformation of Russia is needed, as well as the revitalization of the project “Grad Kitezh” (“The Kingdom of Good and Truth”).

Secondly, Russia is not capable of independently ridding the world of the virus of jihadism. Russia may possibly strengthen the Syrian army so much and even directly support its air force and special forces, which will lead to the liberation of the country's territory from ISIS. But it cannot liberate all countries where the metastases of the “Islamic State” have already emerged and consolidated. Russia can not destroy the causes and causes that gave rise to LIH. After all, the request for justice and the fight against the spiritlessness of the West is objective. Russia cannot independently overcome such social diseases of a huge region as mass poverty, corruption, social injustice, lack of social elevators, distortions in economic development (parasitism of oil and gas powers), etc.

To defeat the “Caliphate” project, it is necessary to offer the world a project of a fair world order (Russian globalization). But for this, again, the internal transformation of Russia is necessary. Only a consistent and successful internal transformation of Russia will allow it to launch a Russian globalization project, satisfying the need of people for justice. Concept vs concept. Western unfair concept can win only fair.

Third, the West and the Islamists will do everything to push the Russian and Islamic civilization. Russia will try to show the image of the aggressor, as in Afghanistan. Russia will immediately turn into a target for terrorists. Moscow, Volgograd, Kazan, Grozny will undergo attacks of terrorists. The Wahhabi jihadist cells throughout Russia will be activated. The enemy will try to sway the situation in the North Caucasus and in other regions of Russia. Stability - the main achievement of the era of Vladimir Putin's rule - will collapse. And it is already undermined by the war of sanctions with the West.

By openly interfering in the war in Syria, we are creating the possibility of creating a center of a protracted war that will deplete the resources of Russia, which are already linked by the conflict in Ukraine. The resources of Russia and our opponents are not comparable. The “Islamic State” will continue to be supported by the Arab monarchies, Turkey and the West.

There will be a new split in society. Sending Russian troops to Syria may initially cause a new explosion of patriotism. But part of society will not understand why Russian soldiers should die for Arab interests. As the war tightens, the social situation will worsen. The West will receive another opportunity to cause a social explosion in Russia.

Fourth, it is obvious that the West is seeking to draw Russia into conflict in the Middle East. A large number of publications appear on how exactly the Russian Federation should be involved in the fight against IS, from air strikes to special forces operations. The West benefits from drawing Russia into a big war in the Middle East, with unclear consequences in the context of the weakening of our country as a result of sanctions and the onset of an economic recession. In addition, this may lead to a strategic redirection of the main IS strikes to Russia (including through Central Asia and the Caucasus).

Therefore, the best option for Moscow is military-technical assistance to the Syrian army, perhaps sending military experts, as well as political coordination to create a real international coalition against the IS, rather than a pro-Western one, which allegedly fights with the IS. History, including Western countries, teaches that it is best to use other people's resources. You can maintain those forces that are already actively fighting with jihadists, or form new ones. So, Damascus, Tehran and Baghdad are our outposts, the “advanced troops” in the fight against the monster spawned by the West. They need to be actively supported, but the full-scale participation of the Russian Federation in this war, especially given the complex internal situation, the lack of unity of society and the readiness of the country's economy, is a strategic mistake that can lead to the defeat of Russian civilization.
Author:
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. chikenous59
    chikenous59 9 September 2015 07: 35 New
    +15
    That's right, it's too early for us to poke around wherever possible like the United States. We have learned from their experience that fighting with other hands is more profitable, safer. Right, our people are doing that they are arming Assad and at the UN they are covering him
    1. Tektor
      Tektor 9 September 2015 13: 45 New
      +5
      Some kind of nonsense. Since losing the Cold War: where is the signed surrender? The USSR collapsed, but its parts did not lose sovereignty, the guarantee of which was nuclear weapons. Economic sovereignty - lost, I do not argue, but not military-political. Therefore, from a historical point of view, the events that followed after 1989 must be interpreted as a strategic retreat: we took the last of the possible lines of defense, there is nowhere to retreat further. Figuratively speaking, we are now near Moscow 1941.
      1. Slobber
        Slobber 9 September 2015 18: 43 New
        +3
        Economic sovereignty - lost, I do not argue, but not military-political.

        In modern times, economic sovereignty is tantamount to military-political.
        Figuratively speaking, we are now near Moscow 1941.

        There is nowhere to retreat, a very bloody popular revolution is breathing in the back, which will finally weaken and bleed Russia, which is still fragile after 1989. So in my opinion everything is right.
      2. gladcu2
        gladcu2 9 September 2015 23: 44 New
        0
        Tektor.

        I agree with you.
        The author certainly did a great job. About three weeks ago, the article would have been a great success.
        But now she is late.

        Europe first. And then there will be someone else.

        The capture has already begun.
  2. parusnik
    parusnik 9 September 2015 07: 36 New
    +12
    Therefore, the best option for Moscow is military-technical assistance to the Syrian army, it is possible to send military specialists, as well as political coordination to create a real international coalition against the Islamic State, and not pro-Western... So, in principle, as is done ...
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 9 September 2015 08: 46 New
      +11
      The only question is the willingness to accept and use help. CSKA exhausted by a long war, the losses are huge (in% more than in the USSR by May 1945). Two years ago, intensive assistance with new technology would dramatically turn the tide. But now I don’t know. Moreover, the West has adjusted the supply of TOUs to moderate, from which TOU is spreading to everyone. The IG scored several large Cornet warehouses. Sino-Sudan MANPADS are also frequent. Yes, and both sides get combat experience, the broads also learned a lot - this must be recognized.

      In general, the main question in the capabilities of the CAA, even with new technology. However, it still depends on the goals, if you keep Latakia and close the access to the sea - then the most loyal parts of the CAA + local + vacationers will probably be able to hold on for even more years. Now, if we are talking about offensives in Aleppo-Idlib or on the oil and gas fields of Palmyra (without which it is very difficult), then there are many questions.
      1. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 9 September 2015 12: 32 New
        +5
        Quote: donavi49
        The only question is the willingness to accept and use help. CSKA exhausted by a long war, the losses are huge (% more than in the USSR by May 1945) ....


        But ISIS was not tired ??? Two guard teams can turn the tide. The Syrians do not even have to do anything, just stand their ground and that's it. The militants will quickly begin to end when they realize that they are being corrupted, especially if you contrast them with cute things like ammunition with bacon and female firing squads.

        To turn the tide of this war, no big victories are needed, you just need to make the war unprofitable for sponsors. When the American with his henchmen understands that the war has become too expensive, ISIS in Syria will simply end, and then in general.
    2. user
      user 9 September 2015 10: 19 New
      +13
      This is not the case in the Russian Federation. There is no spiritual and ideological unity.


      Don’t worry so much for us, better tell me when Russia was ready? If you think carefully never before, except for dragging the Russian Federation into direct military participation, the so-called liberal opposition poses the main danger, this problem really is (in the words of the patriots, but in fact at least someone will fall under).
      1. ermolai
        ermolai 9 September 2015 15: 58 New
        +1
        Quote: user
        liberal opposition, this problem really is (in the words of patriots, but in fact, at least someone will fall under).

        Yes, let them lie down, get up in a pose, but outside the territory of the Russian Federation, for this is a trifle, they are traitors in life, even worse, they are real enemies disguised as patriotic friends, ready, even thirsty, to stab a knife in the back
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 9 September 2015 07: 43 New
    +7
    Russia is already trying not to get into the traps set by the United States. So far this is working out. Good or bad, we'll see with time.
    1. skeptic
      skeptic 9 September 2015 10: 44 New
      +4
      I agree. Russia can’t use its armed forces outside its borders (at least for now) But Central Asia cannot be surrendered, up to the proposal to enter the Russian Federation. It is not good to have penguins spawning near our defense industry enterprises.
  4. Nikolay K
    Nikolay K 9 September 2015 07: 47 New
    +13
    The author exaggerates the foresight of the plans of the American hawk to create the fourth Reich or the great caliphate. Americans do not need anyone's victory, they need chaos in the whole old world, so that against this background a new world will become islands of peace and prosperity. So far, they have succeeded.
    1. Petrix
      Petrix 9 September 2015 10: 02 New
      +4
      Quote: Nikolai K
      Americans don’t need anyone’s victory, they need chaos in the whole old world,

      And if chaos is needed not only by Americans. Maybe someone higher chaos is needed in the United States themselves?
  5. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 9 September 2015 07: 51 New
    +14
    There will be a new split in society. Sending Russian troops to Syria may initially cause a new explosion of patriotism. But part of society will not understand why Russian soldiers should die for Arab interests. As the war tightens, the social situation will worsen. The West will receive another opportunity to cause a social explosion in Russia.

    Yes it will not be. Well, if we don’t send to the Donbass (and this is the threshold of our house), then even more so to Syria. Gone are the days when the USSR fought around the globe.

    Therefore, the best option for Moscow is military-technical assistance to the Syrian army, it is possible to send military specialists, as well as political coordination to create a real international coalition against the IS, and not the pro-Western, which allegedly is at war with the IS.

    What is already happening. Otherwise, why would Bulgarian puppets close their airspace for our aircraft?
  6. Nagaibak
    Nagaibak 9 September 2015 07: 59 New
    +8
    At the moment, this caliphate wins only in the territories where Sunni Muslim Arabs live. And that is not everywhere. But you don’t need to dream and color the mind cards. And in this regard, we should not get into a panic at all. Assad needs to be supported as much as his government is beneficial to our country. How many times have ... we swell grandmothers, dudes get rid of and turn stern towards us. What do we need in Syria?))) Influences?))) Base?))) If the base is help in exchange for land.))) And build on health already on your land. And then today there is a regime friendly to our country, but not tomorrow. Even if someone later considers the deal illegal)))) won’s guantanamo func- ting))) and at least the Cubans haven’t been happy with this fact for so many years.
    1. dmb
      dmb 9 September 2015 11: 30 New
      +3
      In, in. "I left the house, ate to fight, so that the land in Grenada could be given to the peasants." Well, there was at least a bright idea. But in Syria it is worth changing the peasants to Gazprom. But is it worth leaving the hut for this? Your thesis about land exchange is not entirely clear. Do you think that part of Syria will enter the Russian Federation in this case? What for? By the way, this thesis of the article about "Russian fair globalization" is generally nonsense. In its essence, it is not much different from the "unfair globalization of the West." In this case, it is not a sin for the respected author to express his vision of "Russian justice", especially if there are Sechin and Yakunin in their own country and other, less Russian, but very close to them fellow citizens who determine our state policy.
    2. sergeysergey69
      sergeysergey69 10 September 2015 22: 20 New
      0
      It is necessary not only to act in Syria, it is necessary to take into account the Soviet experience, it is still unknown - the Union would collapse, if it were not for the selfless support of "friends" around the world - to act on the basis of priority - is it profitable for Russia or not, for example, I always strain when start talking about "brotherly" bonds and other things - they will ask for 100 pounds! We must get rid of this penchant for Freebies
  7. DREDD
    DREDD 9 September 2015 08: 02 New
    +5
    The author painted everything correctly. Russia really needs to develop rapidly, rely only on its own forces. In addition, if we manage to rise, while in Europe we will build mosques at an accelerated pace, we can return Ukraine (except Lviv) to our orbit, because the Ukrainians, I think, cannot be so stupid as to eternally run after the western carrot suspended in front of their eyes. With the right informational counteraction in the countries of the former USSR, in the future, you can again gather in a union.
    1. asadov
      asadov 9 September 2015 08: 17 New
      +6
      you can collect, only for this you need a very tough hand ..... and complete independence from international organizations. And most importantly - the willingness of citizens to great hardships and exertions for the sake of the goal.
      1. shershen
        shershen 9 September 2015 09: 12 New
        +3
        "And most importantly - the willingness of citizens to great hardships and exertions for the sake of the goal." “Do you believe that yourself?” Most of the citizens are already suffering hardships, the backward part will not deny themselves anything in principle, so it’s worth realistically assessing the situation again. Someone will have to be killed by itself, not without it, society will need to let off steam. The “buildup” inside the country will still gain momentum and we will not affect it in any way.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 9 September 2015 12: 07 New
          +4
          Quote: shershen
          Someone will have to be killed by itself, not without it, society will need to let off steam. The “buildup” inside the country will still gain momentum and we will not affect it in any way.

          So this is the * blue dream * of the world behind the scenes!
          The main thing for them is the destabilization of the situation in Russia, and then the liberal traitors will drag the country into the abyss of civil war and the collapse of the specific principalities.
          Therefore, Putin is right in his desire not to rock the boat, otherwise you can * roll over * during the next economic crisis, which the gentlemen from the Bilderberg Club will happily arrange (on such an occasion!).
          It is necessary to strengthen economically, to unite spiritually, to improve legislation - and on this basis to consolidate society ...
          And in the big showdown of the third level, we in no case can interfere. An exception can only be in Ukraine (there are practically Russian people there), and then when there is a clear threat of * capture * by its hegemons and the creation of a military bridgehead there against Russia.
  8. Letterksi
    Letterksi 9 September 2015 08: 33 New
    +4
    This whole map is populated by hot youth. There is enough potential for war there. More "age" countries like Europe and Russia can resist a big war. It is quite possible that it will pass a strip at the bottom of our borders. But you need to prepare for it
  9. Aleksander
    Aleksander 9 September 2015 08: 38 New
    +3
    Society is divided into Christians, Muslims, neopagans, atheists, worshipers of various sects, etc. into monarchists, liberals, democrats, communists, socialists, nationalists (including small-town ones), etc. into rich and poor, into “successful” and "Losers." Young people were dragged into dozens of different subcultures with western roots. The embodiment of official patriotism are bikers, that is, a typical Western subculture that grew up on Western associations of a marginal, gangster kind. Society has a real kaleidoscope in their heads

    This description is primarily the West itselfAnd the USA, and Great Britain and other Germany. And they have this split much deeper and more.
    Firstly, Russia is not ready for such a war. The main role is played by the country's internal readiness for war, the mobilization of all resources from ideology to the economy. This is not the case in the Russian Federation. There is no spiritual and ideological unity.


    Does the West really have this willingness ?! Yes and no mention! They were even confused before the crowds of refugees, ready to surrender themselves with giblets, having lost their face. What kind of war are they? Moreover, Western citizens have much more to lose than Russians, a well-fed, well-to-do life, which they won’t refuse for any gimmicks. ....
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 9 September 2015 09: 21 New
      +1
      I would add that there is no split in Russia, unlike the West. The bulk of Christians and atheists. Muslims live in their centuries-old habitats - the Caucasus, Tatarstan, Bashkiria. And in general, no one bothers anyone, except especially stubborn ones. Sects and neopagans are an absolute minority, they are just trying to attract more attention, often with attacks on traditional religions.
  10. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 9 September 2015 08: 47 New
    +3
    I think the IS cannot resist a normal regular army. The problem is that after the defeat, in a collision with the army, the war will become partisan (while maintaining funding from the Arabs and other countries) in the Middle Ages, this issue was resolved by large-scale massacre. the modern army of a developed state cannot do this. So the crisis will be as long as the sponsors are alive. I think while Russia is doing everything right - it helps with weapons and borders on the castle. The problem is brewing on the part of Wed Asia; there is no easy politics there and they don’t know what to do.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 9 September 2015 08: 52 New
      +3
      Well, it is, see the example of Baigi - Iraq.

      Attack from all sides in small groups, babahmobiles and insurrection from the inside - a city in a few days under the Islamic State.

      CSKA, Badr, Iranians gathered a fist with tanks, TOS, helicopters and combat Shiites. A long and exhausting assault. Big losses for both the Baboons and the army. A bunch of different episodes. Total about 20 days of fighting and cleared Baigi.

      Badr, fighting Iranians, part of the ISOF were taken to Anbar (the city started a massacre, the Sunnis slaughtered several Shiite militias, in response the Shiite militias carried out a tough mopping-up operation in the quarter and, in general, there was a lot of passion). The Babahs realized this, pulled themselves in, and in 3 days killed the army detachment, the police and the Sunni militias (most of which the IS helped to capture the city).

      Now again, Shiites, Badr, parts of the ISOF, TOSs and helicopters are pulling together under Baigi.
  11. RPG_
    RPG_ 9 September 2015 08: 59 New
    +2
    There is another option, though very risky.
    Blitzkrieg:
    For six months, defeat the militants in Syria, clean up the main settlements and communication centers (and at once check whether our armed forces are able to carry out such operations) On the initial rise of patriotism, this is quite realistic;
    Solemnly announce the withdrawal of troops and leave only instructors, advisers and aviation at the airbase leased without urgent rent (if there is none).
    True, the risk is huge because if it does not burn out, the consequences can be disastrous.
    (ps it’s clear that I’m a sofa theorist, but there is such an opportunity, it only needs to be worked out in detail and carefully)
    1. dckx
      dckx 9 September 2015 12: 13 New
      +1
      this option is complicated by cutting off the supply of weapons from the "dark" side, as it seems to me to completely do this fail. A six-month blitzkrieg is not possible.
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 9 September 2015 12: 18 New
      +3
      Quote: RPG_
      There is another option, though very risky. Blitzkrieg:

      This is a political and military adventure! Against us (aggressors!) All Western mongrel, led by the exceptional ones, will immediately stand up. Then it will definitely be "iron caput!" West + Muslims and everything is against us ...
      Do we need this?
    3. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 9 September 2015 13: 38 New
      0
      You are right, but if Comrade Stalin had been in the yard and Comrade Stalin had been alive, in 1945-5 years all the partisans would have been buried, a rim and a school built. Children after school were sent to Russian Universities ..... And so a waste of the lives of our military. Arabs, like a girl, have one mood today, tomorrow another.
    4. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 9 September 2015 13: 38 New
      0
      You are right, but if Comrade Stalin had been in the yard and Comrade Stalin had been alive, in 1945-5 years all the partisans would have been buried, a rim and a school built. Children after school were sent to Russian Universities ..... And so a waste of the lives of our military. Arabs, like a girl, have one mood today, tomorrow another.
    5. wiwa
      wiwa 9 September 2015 23: 43 New
      0
      Blitzkrieg is possible only if you will release the homeland from the OCCUPIERS, and in a foreign territory will be like in Ukraine, there will be more deserters and the military commissariats will run after conscripts ...
  12. Vladimir
    Vladimir 9 September 2015 09: 21 New
    +2
    Quote: RPG_
    For six months, defeat the militants in Syria,

    It’s possible, of course, but you have to keep a contingent there like the Afghan one so that this Islamic locust does not appear there again in six months. Probably the best option would be technical support, provided that the military equipment is correctly used.
  13. sledge
    sledge 9 September 2015 09: 31 New
    0
    So Khazin talks about drawing Russia into the war - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMheSkwsxfc&feature=youtu.be
  14. Uzzy
    Uzzy 9 September 2015 10: 06 New
    +2
    Finally, this article, from and to. Thanks to the author! All laid out on the shelves. And in reality, support for leading fronts is indispensable, but only support, not full engagement in the conflict. But only with the internal transformation will have to wait very long and assiduously (unless of course we live to see this time).
  15. spec3641
    spec3641 9 September 2015 10: 13 New
    +1
    From the beginning, inner transformation and unity! That's for sure!!
  16. DobryAAH
    DobryAAH 9 September 2015 10: 39 New
    +1
    But we can’t get anywhere from the war. The only question is the timing. We are just waiting for a series of wars, and Russia will come out victorious.
  17. Jääkorppi
    Jääkorppi 9 September 2015 10: 55 New
    +2
    Thank! But the main thing for Russia is the creation of a civil society, the development of a national idea and the struggle for the Soviet post-space and, above all, Ukraine! And there isn’t enough strength for everything! And in an external theater of action it is better to cooperate with China!
  18. Yarik
    Yarik 9 September 2015 11: 48 New
    +1
    Author RESPECT and RESPECT !!!
  19. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 9 September 2015 12: 08 New
    +3
    The United States lives, exports cut paper, does not intend to repay debt. ISIS also has free revenues, not from production. Stolen oil. I, slave labor is free, sau.di.ty. They feed in better conditions.
  20. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 9 September 2015 12: 56 New
    +3
    Good analytical article. To the author +. good
    A few words on the topic.
    Concept versus concept. A Western unfair concept can be defeated only by a fair one.
    All is correct. Only under the western billions of dollars they poke, and under our fair - good intentions ...
    Then you need to compare the propaganda machine of the West and our * RT *. And others in general cannot get out on the western public. We are blocked by the lies and PR of Western propaganda. They even made "aggression" from the bloodless reunion of Crimea with Russia. Can you imagine what will happen if you have to use weapons!
    why Russian soldiers should die for Arab interests.
    Should not. But if Bashar al-Assad falls, then our Russian interests will collapse with him. Qatar will flood Europe with damping gas. States are ready to pay the difference in price with candy wrappers. And our economy, which receives 60% of the revenue from gas trading, will be ... in a knockout. Therefore, I think no one will forbid volunteers to go on a * safari tour * to the SAR. Well, help by military experts in mastering technology (with a practical demonstration!) Is everywhere in the order of things.
    Damascus, Tehran and Baghdad - these are our outposts, "advanced units" in the fight against the monster generated by the West.
    This is true. But why did the author pass over the silence of such a player as Israel? Does he really need the accession of the IG, which has already designated him as the next target? -- No. Question: why a state where “our people are a quarter past” cannot be an ally in the coalition of opponents of the Islamic State? The ground operation is too tough for them (and they won’t do it if there is no direct invasion), but aviation could have helped! (To the opponents of Israel: IV Stalin fiercely * loved * Britain, but used his "friend" as much as possible against Germany. It’s not a sin to learn from the great ones.)
    But in general, I liked the article: there is food for thought. Thank. hi
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 24 January 2016 01: 43 New
      0
      Quote: BoA KAA
      why did the author pass over by such a player as Israel?

      Quote: Vika
      Syria and Israel de jure are at war, since a peace treaty between these countries has not been signed so far

      So the "help" of Israel may be misunderstood primarily by the Syrians themselves yes
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. msm
    msm 9 September 2015 13: 04 New
    +1
    Quote: msm
    If something hits Saudis, Emirates and Kuwait, then the Fin.Is support will stop, oil prices will skyrocket. One good. This is so - dreams ... Do not judge strongly.
    1. SlavaP
      SlavaP 9 September 2015 22: 10 New
      0
      Unfortunately, this is the only thing that can stop the massacre in Syria. Only here is how to do it so that we don’t light up ourselves?
  23. Weyland
    Weyland 9 September 2015 14: 08 New
    +2
    The Soviet Union was ready for World War II thanks to internal spiritual unity, the creation of a society of creation and service, where the general is above private, the rapid development of science and technology, industrialization and collectivization, the comprehensive preparation of the military-industrial complex and the army.
    This is not the case in the Russian Federation. There is no spiritual and ideological unity. Society is divided into Christians, Muslims, neopagans, atheists, worshipers of various sects, etc. into monarchists, liberals, democrats, communists, socialists, nationalists (including small-town ones), etc. into rich and poor, into “successful” and "Losers."


    Yeah ... and where did Bandera, Vlasov, Lokotsky self-government come from - I can’t imagine !? Everyone over 40 remembered life under the tsar and could compare - and far from all drew conclusions in favor of the USSR. This explains the mass surrender in 1941. Consolidation society came precisely because of the atrocities of the Nazis - and if the Nazis did not treat the population of the occupied territories as subhuman - it is not known how the matter would end!
    And now it’s the same: in the “dashing 90s” there would be many people who would gladly meet the NATO occupiers - and now you are naughty, we’ve passed! Of the "Christians, Muslims, neopagans, atheists, worshipers of various sects, etc., listed by the author as monarchists, liberals, democrats, communists, socialists, nationalists (including small-town), etc." only liberals and democrats represent the 5th column - but fortunately, there are not so many of them, and if anything - "according to the laws of wartime ..." am
  24. den3080
    den3080 9 September 2015 14: 13 New
    0
    I liked only one thing in this article - the signature in the picture: Too small to read so couldn't translate smile
  25. Dan Slav
    Dan Slav 9 September 2015 16: 34 New
    0
    This theory has a right to exist. But no more than that.
    Shoving now, and ever, to Syria is not realistic. There are no conditions for this.
    Even Mistral, by the way, was not sold to us!
    Let them deal with their Huns and barbarians themselves!
    (We ourselves have enough of this good. We must clearly guard the perimeter of Central Asia.)
  26. Igor K
    Igor K 9 September 2015 17: 13 New
    0
    The material is presented separately, these are all links in one chain - the immersion of the whole world in chaos against the background of the transition to the sixth technological order of the Atlantists.
    America will also be destabilized, apparently the backstage will move to Australia, New Zealand where stability will be easier to ensure in the absence of a land border with destabilized facilities.
  27. gammipapa
    gammipapa 9 September 2015 19: 52 New
    +1
    While the whole third world one looks just like a game, nothing substantial, everything is quite easy and simple.
    But for now, it’s just silly to make any forecasts.
    If serious players like Europe of China or Russia are involved, then the scenarios will change dramatically. Large states experiencing serious combat losses will never beat pawns, the 21st century in the yard, in fact, everyone understands who pulls what strings and what. No one will surrender to the mercy of the conquerors, the puppeteers will receive in full and they understand this very well, therefore they only beat the weak who can’t fight back.
  28. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 9 September 2015 20: 05 New
    0
    We can’t intervene in the war in Syria. "Sworn friends" are just waiting for this. The West-West opposition will immediately increase its influence within the country, taking advantage of the first human losses. First you need to put things in order in the country, deal with "effective managers", "shift workers, shit .kraty ", to raise the economy, industry, provide youth with work, improve the living standards of the population. This takes years, and for 20 years we only did what we “squandered” the Soviet inheritance. Russia needs at least 10 years of peace of mind, and they are unlikely to provide it to us.
  29. Elena2013
    Elena2013 9 September 2015 22: 37 New
    0
    The German could not stand the lies in the media about refugees.
  30. Rus86
    Rus86 10 September 2015 06: 42 New
    0
    from the series Broken Sword of the Empire. extremes, idealization.
    there are words in the song, if “We give Kosovo, tomorrow the troops of the occupants will be in Moscow” ...
    how to correctly express the attitude, but in the “Po-chansky” way, on the Russian scale, the “back” is now impossible to give. (don’t scold strictly)
  31. VladimirRG
    VladimirRG 10 September 2015 07: 04 New
    0
    In principle, everything is correctly written, but only this is not a conspiracy of world elites.
  32. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 11 September 2015 13: 18 New
    0
    The more I look at the unfolding events in geopolitics, the more truly I come to the conclusion that Wang’s predictions are gradually coming true.
    And this means that geyrope and geymerike full of cranks, and we will strengthen and become a great Power.
    If only to clean all the creatures in power structures, but to change the gavnoelita to a decent one. Cherovo, when money rules the ball ...
  33. Kutuzov
    Kutuzov 24 January 2016 01: 30 New
    0
    As I looked into the water.