Brazil is ready to purchase a batch of Pantsir-C1 air defense missile systems from Russia

The official representative of the Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC) in an interview RIA News told that in the 2016 year Russia is going to begin deliveries in Brazil of the Pantsir-C1 ZRPK party. About how many anti-aircraft missile-cannon complexes included in the party ordered by Brazil, is not reported.

Representative of the FSMTC:

The allocation of budget funds for the purchase of "shell" is planned in Brazil in 2016, the Russian side was informed about this.

Answering the question of journalists about the number of complexes, the interlocutor of the information agency said that it depends on the funds that Brazil intends to allocate for the implementation of the trade agreement.

Representative of the FSMTC:

Everything will depend on the financial resources allocated by the Brazilian budget, but we can talk about several dozen complexes.

At the same time, it is reported that interest in the Brazilian Defense Ministry’s Russian “Pantsiry-С1” began to be expressed several months before the start of the 2014 world football championship. However, the plans for the acquisition of the complexes were postponed, and the first Pantsiri-С1 can appear in Brazil not earlier than the summer of 2016 of the year - the time of the opening of the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, whose sports facilities (Olympiads) can be “covered” by Russian weapon systems.

The Pantsir-S1 is a self-propelled rocket-gun complex developed by the Tula Mechanical Engineering Design Bureau. In fact, Pantsir-С1 is a development of Tunguska-M and is intended for the defense of important objects, including strategically important ones. The ammunition complex - 12 missiles and 1400 shells. "Pantsir-S1" has a dual-band three-dimensional radar (antenna type - PAR.). Target detection range - to 36 km. The distance to the goal - to 20 km, altitude - to 15 km. The maximum speed of the target is 1000 m / s.

Comments

[kil 31]

Who knows c2, we do not have the right to sell? Or they only have money for c1.

[vodolaz]

Right, you need to return the markets of Latin America.

[Vadim237]

Something our Ministry of Armor does not buy, they are expecting something more effective.

[self-propelled]

Quote: Vadim237

Something our Ministry of Armor does not buy, they are expecting something more effective.

how is it not purchased ?! quite quite?!?! But what about "Pantsiri" for the protection of the Arctic borders?
about the "more effective" - ​​from the known is "Pantsir-SM" (by 2017 they plan to supply the troops)

[Vadim237]

Here, most likely, they are waiting for the appearance of the Shell of SM, with the possibility of intercepting hypersonic targets, and then the maximum speed of the hit targets at 1000 meters per second with the current Shell is not serious.

[klavyr]

buy our "Armor", the most humane "Armor" in the world! (no one will suffer, quickly and not painfully)

[Vadim237]

We already know about the humanity of the Shell on Syria, not a single Israeli aircraft shot down.

[Thunderbolt]

The Israelis inflict their airstrikes only after careful reconnaissance, use "smart" ammunition without entering the affected area. What is the strength of the S-400 and the Shell? S-300 It would be a real tandem.

[Kukish]

Quote: Thunderbolt

.Therefore, such a fuss was when the information went that the S-300 would be delivered to Syria. It would be a real tandem.

The fuss was for another reason, the danger of shooting down civilian aircraft, given that all kinds of terrorists and other gangs inside Syria could get Syrian weapons, go al Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Carrying out the C300 in tandem with the Shell is not a very big problem, especially having a border with Syria.

But terrorists shooting at civilian planes - Israel doesn’t need a damn thing.

[Thunderbolt]

Quote: Kukish

The fuss was for another reason - the danger of the downing of civilian aircraft, given that all kinds of terrorists and other gangs inside Syria could get Syrian weapons, go al Hezbollah in Lebanon

The safety of civilian airliners is a plausible excuse and information curtain. I have little idea of ​​terrorists serving and successfully using such a complex complex. In addition, civilian airliners can be shot down from outdated and less-capable systems that the Syrian army has in service. But such cases have not been noted. . "Bearded" do not use captured or contraband air defense weapons to fight civilian liners. Give them the S-300 (".. and I don't agree for anything less .. (c)")

[Kukish]

Quote: Thunderbolt

The safety of civilian liners is a plausible excuse and an information curtain. I can hardly imagine terrorists serving and successfully using such a complex complex

Successfully not a fact, training is required for a long time, but it is quite possible. I hope you do not represent all the terrorists as dumb raggies ...
Among them, there are quite educated people who can master such systems. There the Iranians are spinning, etc.

Especially considering statements like -

Specialists from Iran have already been trained to work with S-300 systems, therefore, after resuming the supply of air defense systems, there is no need to invite new Russian specialists, said the head of the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic, Hossein Dekhkan, following his visit to Russia.

Therefore, who will sit behind this system there is a completely solvable question and the Iranians will contribute if that.

Quote: Thunderbolt

.In addition, civilian liners can be shot down from outdated and less capable systems that the Syrian army is armed with.

Israeli civilian aircraft from such a range that Syria has - everything that Syria does not bring down.
But the S-300 because of the range allows attacking civilian aircraft over Israel.

Quote: Thunderbolt

.But no such cases have been noted.

The Ukrainians shot down the Tu-154 civilian aircraft over the Black Sea in 2001, albeit inadvertently with the S-200 system.

[Thunderbolt]

Specialists from Iran have already been trained to work with S-300 systems, so after resuming the supply of air defense systems no need to invite new Russian specialists, said the head of the Ministry of Defense of the Islamic Republic, Hossein Dehkan, following his visit to Russia.

How is it not necessary, if the Iranians have even been trained, then at a complex that is no longer produced, which means that if there is a supply, they will receive something different for which they were preparing. And without specialists in application and maintenance and tuning, they will fight by the "poke" method. However, this is not relevant. And in general, one should not so unconditionally believe the statements of the Iranian Minister of War, voiced in the open press. Especially the Minister of War ...

Quote: Kukish

Israeli civilian aircraft from such a range that Syria has - everything that Syria does not bring down.

Your airport. Rosh Pin, for example, can be accessed from Syrian territory, but they don’t shoot something, even more so if Iran connects to it (as you say), then this is not difficult. Theoretically.

Quote: Kukish

Quote: Thunderbolt
.But no such cases have been noted.

[SSeT]

What is it about - you don’t need an armor and S-300 to bring down a civilian airliner, there will be enough old men if you want

[Manul]

Quote: Kukish

But terrorists shooting at civilian planes - Israel doesn’t need a damn thing.

How do you imagine this? A group of terrorists captures the S-300 complex, looks at the Internet for instructions (downloads a PDF file and does a training manual), and then starts to crumble everything that moves? And the dude with binoculars chooses the goals .. So what?

[Vadim237]

Israel has probably made and bombed all over the territory for the second dozen raids on Syria. Rather, Israel has a good anti-aircraft defense system; therefore, none of the 50 air defense missile systems shot down any aircraft.

[Thunderbolt]

Yes, at least ten dozen raids. No one disputes that Israel has a powerful air force and good intelligence. And a proven tactic of unexpected raids on Syrian territory. Therefore, in order to successfully counteract them, Assad needs a stable air monitoring system, a sufficient number of modern interceptor fighters, long-range and short-range missile battalions. The synthesis of these means would force the Israelis to abandon airstrikes or take into account possible losses. But the presence of such a balanced air defense system in a war-torn Syria is fantastic. Therefore, even 50 "Shells" (and not the fact that there are 50 of them) will not make the weather. But this does not implore the declared characteristics of the complex. Compare their range of destruction with the range of the "bombs" that the Israelis are throwing.

[maks007]

Vadim237
We already know about the humanity of the Shell on Syria, not a single Israeli aircraft shot down.

http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/1238842/
or briefly from 02.09.2013

A US military plane crashed near the Syrian-Jordanian border. Missiles fell into the sea.

The news about the F-31 Raptor downed on August 22 was reported by the American newspaper "Los Angeles Times". The newspaper also reported that on August 30, Syrian air defense shot down 4 American Tomahawk missiles. They were shot down by the Russian Pantsir-1 anti-missile system. These are Russian anti-aircraft missiles that destroyed American missiles. Sources of the newspaper believe that the Pentagon fired four missiles in order, according to the Los Angeles Times, "to feel the Syrian pulse."

According to the newspaper, the loss of a modern F-22 aircraft in northern Jordan, where five F-22s are located, is the main reason for the delay in aggression against Syria.

The Oklahoma Post reported, citing US military sources, that an F-22 Raptor crashed north of Jordan.
Military expert John Blue Reed told the newspaper that Syria has not just S-300s, but modernized S-300s. He does not exclude that this is the S-400.
...

[Kukish]

Quote: maks007

The news about the F-31 Raptor downed on August 22 was reported by the American newspaper "Los Angeles Times".

Can you link to an article in the Los Angeles Times?

[Vadim237]

These are articles on unnamed sources of pure lies.

[tovarisch]

Make a mistake. Recently there was a report about a downed LA belonging to Israel. And the Israelis attack from the depths of their territory. And the shell has a range of 20 km to the target

[Kukish]

Recently there was a report about a downed LA belonging to Israel

Yes, these messages are all levels of OBS - one grandmother said

[shans2]

the same as the fact that there were no losses from the paisans in the 2006 war in Lebanon, and the Americans talked about underestimating the losses in passe by 3 times the real losses in armored vehicles.)

[Kukish]

Quote: shans2

the same as the fact that the Israelis had no casualties in the 2006 war in Lebanon,

Unlike Russia, which hides losses even in peacetime, in Israel no one ever said that there were no losses in the Second Lebanon and did not underestimate.
Why write lies, I don’t understand

[Manul]

Quote: Kukish

Unlike Russia, which hides losses even in peacetime, in Israel no one ever said that there were no losses in the Second Lebanon and did not underestimate.

In general, you always tell the truth, only the truth and only the truth . This is our mote in our own eye. Take a closer look at yourself.

[Vadim237]

And it turned out to be a lie.

[Polite Moose]

Great news. The customer base is expanding.

[vovanpain]

And why not help the Brazilians, especially for the money.

[avt]

Quote: vovanpain

And why not help the Brazilians, especially for the money.

Do not rush to rejoice. This song has been going on for a long time, the Brazilians will either ask, then turn on the back, but at the same time they require counter purchases such as with Sukhoi and Embraer. Beetles are still those who do not want to part with money, even if it is very necessary.

[Hubun]

Russian weapons again become fashionable popular in the world, and indeed

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Hubun

Russian weapons again become fashionable popular in the world

Because this is the only equivalent replacement for the light elf weapons.

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Vladimirets

Because this is the only equivalent replacement for the light elf weapons.

And it will not turn off by the signal from the satellite.

[Ze Kot]

Who knows who knows

[Koresh]

I apologize for being off topic but the first public shot of the armata is shown.

[The boat]

Quote: Polite Moose

Great news.

yes, what news! P.c, conquered the markets!

Quote: Hubun

Russian weapons become fashionable again

b / \ I, am I reading this alone ???

[Polite Moose]

Quote: Das Boot

P.c, conquered the markets!

You have to start somewhere.

[The boat]

OK..

Quote: Polite Elk

With something you need

??
son, Gazprom is not a moderator) is it really not clear that this garbage will not be able for a long time .. however ... we continue to monitor the ruble and continue to jerk off on the enemies of the Russian world ... it’s to blame .... if so ...

[Sergey333]

They will not deliver them in the year 16 - they vomit a lot - they don’t want to take the Kamaz chassis, they want to organize production from them, so the chances of delivery in the near future are almost zero, given Rogozin’s statements that the plant where they are assembled is overloaded with orders.

[Polite Moose]

Quote: avt

Do not rush to rejoice. This song has been going on for a long time, the Brazilians will either ask, then turn on the back, but at the same time they require counter purchases such as with Sukhoi and Embraer. Beetles are still those who do not want to part with money, even if it is very necessary.

In-in. Selling something to Brazil is not a trivial task. And if the official representative announced the start of deliveries in 2016. that means, after all, we stuck our sting in their defense industry.

[Coconut]

Quote: maks007

Vadim237
We already know about the humanity of the Shell on Syria, not a single Israeli aircraft shot down.

http://newsland.com/news/detail/id/1238842/
or briefly from 02.09.2013

A US military plane crashed near the Syrian-Jordanian border. Missiles fell into the sea.

The news about the F-31 Raptor downed on August 22 was reported by the American newspaper "Los Angeles Times". The newspaper also reported that on August 30, Syrian air defense shot down 4 American Tomahawk missiles. They were shot down by the Russian Pantsir-1 anti-missile system. These are Russian anti-aircraft missiles that destroyed American missiles. Sources of the newspaper believe that the Pentagon fired four missiles in order, according to the Los Angeles Times, "to feel the Syrian pulse."

According to the newspaper, the loss of a modern F-22 aircraft in northern Jordan, where five F-22s are located, is the main reason for the delay in aggression against Syria.

The Oklahoma Post reported, citing US military sources, that an F-22 Raptor crashed north of Jordan.
Military expert John Blue Reed told the newspaper that Syria has not just S-300s, but modernized S-300s. He does not exclude that this is the S-400.
...

our rocket-throwers do not like)

[marlin1203]

Why share the skin of an unkilled bear? They are only planning to buy these complexes. When, in the conditions of the economic crisis, they decide on the money, the volume of purchases and sign contracts, then we will "make noise".

[Reptiloid]

Who knows, please write! On the video is the star-logo? Why is she looking like this? There is in the same tv program when the stars become even smaller. What is the symbolism? There was an article about our Robot. And there is an incomprehensible star of 3 colors. Loss of symbols --- loss of historical memory !!!