The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons

The National Interest columnist Kyle Mizokami spoke about the most deadly weapons of the North Atlantic alliance. His rating leads RIA "News".

First on the list is the F-16 Fighting Falcon multi-role fighter, which, according to Mizoki, is the “most common fighter” of NATO. Various modifications of the aircraft used by the Air Force of Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Poland, Norway, Turkey, Portugal and the United States.

The next is the German self-propelled howitzer Panzerhaubitze 2000, which, according to the observer, is one of the most advanced artillery systems used by the military alliance. PzH 2000 has a gun in 155-mm in 52 caliber capable of producing three shots in nine seconds, but its speed is unstable due to problems with overheating of the barrel.

In third place in the list of the most deadly weapons of the North Atlantic alliance were submarines of the 212 project, called the most advanced NATO diesel submarines. According to Mizokami, they are “extremely quiet” and were designed to patrol the Mediterranean and Baltic seas. The observer notes that the German military equipped these submarines with Sea Hake torpedoes, and the Italian - Black Shark.

Also in the top there is an assault rifle Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel and semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. Its rate of fire ranges from 750 to 950 rounds per minute.

Closes the top five leaders of the general purpose machine gun FN MAG, used by almost all NATO countries, including Canada, Belgium, France, Denmark, Luxembourg, Greece, the Netherlands, Turkey, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States. Its caliber is 7.62-mm, the rate of fire is from 650 to 950 shots per minute. In addition, the FN MAG machine gun uses a system for quickly replacing the superheated barrel.

Comments

[Dezinto]

Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....

Neither system nor classification ...

[Haettenschweiler]

It is not entirely clear what they meant by "the deadliest weapons" at all. Because I have associations not with technology, but rather with nuclear weapons, chemical and bacteriological weapons, cluster munitions ...

[Shadowcat]

Well, they simply cannot be recognized + some of them have signed or ratified the convention, so they can’t use cluster munitions for example.

[Now we are free]

And what should this "news" say? For each of the above NATO weapons, the Russian Federation and the CSTO have equivalent answers in the same categories:
F-16 (another question in what modifications) -Mig-29 / K / 35.
PzH 2000 (another question in what quantities) -MSTA-S / Coalition
Submarines of project 212 (another question in what quantities) -Submarines of project 636 "Varshavyanka"
Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ... ) -Ak-74M / Ak-103 and separately AK-12
General-purpose machine gun FN MAG (here I agree Belgians made a cool machine gun, but I would still prefer MG-42 oh, MG-3 ) -PKMN and separately "Pecheneg".

PS
And what about NATO with the Tunguska / Pantsir type air defense missile systems, where missile and cannon armament are combined?
What about a large-caliber KORD-type machine gun that can fire from a bipod?
What's with the "ADS" two-medium machine? Having the ability to fire both under water and on land WITHOUT CHANGE OF AMMUNITION.
What about the BMD-1/2/3/4 / 4M, "SPRUT" (having a full-fledged tank 125 mm cannon and having the ability to fire from the water), which is being dropped using parachutes?
What about the Dzhigit MANPADS, which has the ability to fire two missiles at the target simultaneously?
Etc. etc. and mind you without any "Shapkozakidatelstva" ...

[DenZ]

Alas, the project 212 boats have in. independent power plant and Varshavyanka left behind. Let's hope that ours will finish the Russian VNU and we will level our chances.

[bastard]

Quote: Now we are free

Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ...

Well, yes, an assault rifle with a hollow of 508 mm (half a meter!!!!). . . Yes, there a dog can live!
I'll be right back, I'll go change my pants. . .

[ziqzaq]

Quote: villain

Well, yes, an assault rifle with a hollow of 508 mm (half a meter!!!!). . . Yes, there a dog can live!

Perhaps the barrel length was meant?

[bastard]

Quote: ziqzaq

Perhaps the barrel length was meant?

Well, I would have written.

[bout]

Quote: Now we are free

And what should this "news" say? For each of the above NATO weapons, the Russian Federation and the CSTO have equivalent answers in the same categories:
F-16 (another question in what modifications) -Mig-29 / K / 35.
PzH 2000 (another question in what quantities) -MSTA-S / Coalition
Submarines of project 212 (another question in what quantities) -Submarines of project 636 "Varshavyanka"
Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ... ) -Ak-74M / Ak-103 and separately AK-12
General-purpose machine gun FN MAG (here I agree Belgians made a cool machine gun, but I would still prefer MG-42 oh, MG-3 ) -PKMN and separately "Pecheneg".

PS
And what about NATO with the Tunguska / Pantsir type air defense missile systems, where missile and cannon armament are combined?
What about a large-caliber KORD-type machine gun that can fire from a bipod?
What's with the "ADS" two-medium machine? Having the ability to fire both under water and on land WITHOUT CHANGE OF AMMUNITION.
What about the BMD-1/2/3/4 / 4M, "SPRUT" (having a full-fledged tank 125 mm cannon and having the ability to fire from the water), which is being dropped using parachutes?
What about the Dzhigit MANPADS, which has the ability to fire two missiles at the target simultaneously?
Etc. etc. and mind you without any "Shapkozakidatelstva" ...

It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

[vorobey]

Quote: boruta

It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

Yes Yes...

[bastard]

Quote: boruta

It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

Yeah, your Polish, of course, is better.

[tol100v]

Quote: boruta

but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

Take and try on yourself! And so far no one has complained and made no complaints!

[Kibalchish]

There is simply no one to complain about. Those against whom it was used were silent forever

[bastard]

Quote: boruta

in reality, soviet weapons are much worse

Quote: Tol100v

Take and try on yourself! And so far no one has complained and made no complaints!

In Africa, one black man bought a potion from a local sorcerer, such as from bullets, rubbed a bottle into himself and asked his korefan to shoot a Kalash, sort of like field tests. Koresh thrust a horn into him. The dude was given a Darwin award (posthumously).
Kind boruta! I already made the potion. Inform the address in Poland, I will send for free. For friends, do not mind.

[Karayakupovo]

Well yes. And for some reason the demand for our weapons is increasing. Tell me why? You can even mention the word "price-quality". I would also add the word brand.

[Jackking]

A rifle with a barrel of 20 inches is not on paper? And where did the vaunted M4 go - apparently, the barrel length let us down :)))
And as for the fact that Soviet weapons are much worse - I would like more details and details. It is "worse" only in the fact that with it they do not drive countries into the Stone Age (Libya, Iraq), but terrifies the dreadful bedding

[Dazdranagon]

Quote: boruta

It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

- of course! Indeed, therefore, around the world, AK has received recognition! Where do you get out of? Apple overeaten?

[Tusv]

Quote: It may be on paper, but in reality, Soviet weapons are much worse [/ quote

Either the pilots of the twenty-seventh dryers in one patrol of five NATO shifts showed: "Bye, bye, kirdyk gasp." Aircraft carriers they have it. Fact. Well, the diesel on the submarines is still better than ours. For everything else, at least parity. And air defense systems are space for them. half a century behind

[33 Watcher]

And specifically, you used a lot of Soviet weapons?

[igordok]

Quote: Haettenschweiler

It is not entirely clear what they meant by "the deadliest weapons" at all. Because I have associations not with technology, but rather with nuclear weapons, chemical and bacteriological weapons, cluster munitions ...

The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons

How many were killed with the F-16, Panzerhaubitze 2000, the 212 project submarine, the Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle and the FN MAG?
WMD will destroy millions at a time, and if you take unlimited time, then the Mosin and Mauser rifles have surpassed everyone.

[gjv]

Quote: Haettenschweiler

It is not entirely clear what they meant by "the deadliest weapons" at all.

For example, the FN MAG (M240) (7.62) is in service with 117 countries. The most famous wars and conflicts: Doomsday War, War of Attrition, Six Day War, War of Independence of Namibia, Civil War in Libya, Falkland War, Gulf War, Iraq War, War in Afghanistan (since 2001), War in Afghanistan ( since 2015), Congolese crisis. In these and other nicks, the FN MAG helped a lot with the old woman with the scythe.

[vorobey]

Quote: DEZINTO

Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....

saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

[vodolaz]

Quote: vorobey

saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))

[Dezinto]

Quote: vodolaz

Quote: vorobey

saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))

Balcony...

- And then shshshuheer!

[Andrey NM]

Siphon spray can, magnesium, nitrate, sulfur from matches, hunting matches. Boom!

[DenZ]

Nanado! Nostalgia tortured and surging memories.

[bastard]

Quote: Andrey NM

Siphon spray can, magnesium, nitrate, sulfur from matches, hunting matches. Boom!

We saw a block or a box from "Zaporozhets" (magnesium alloy) with a file, add a little potassium permanganate (for schoolchildren: potassium permanganate, khvormula - KMnO4). ... ... Class! ! !
They also communicated Bertoletov’s salt from the chemistry cabinet, also weigh!

It used to be that we went to a steel rolling plant, you could go freely or through a fence, such as a folder, you would take saltpeter, charcoal and piercing, make racquets themselves, explosive packets. Ehhh! Golden childhood! We lived more interesting than the current kids, even though we had no tablets.
Now shkolota buys ready firecrackers, unhappy children! All for the money.

[vorobey]

Quote: villain

Sawing a block file

Rospotrebnadzor will be drawn now and will ban both you and us and VO ..

[Ruslan67]

Quote: vorobey

Rospotrebnadzor will now be drawn

After that, we saw with renewed energy and ... T-shirts with the inscription-I Rospotrebnadzor come into fashion

[bastard]

Quote: vorobey

Rospotrebnadzor will be drawn now and will ban both you and us and VO ..

Duc, "Zaporozhets" is no longer produced, and only British scientists can conduct a controlled reaction to transform cast iron into magnesium (theoretically, kaneshna!).
Yes, and I grew up a long time ago. (Oh, sorry!)

[Andrey NM]

And instead of magnesium, they sawed old aircraft wheels of the chassis, they are made of AMG alloy. And also sodium and potassium were thrown into the water ... And what fumes from tennis balls and celluloid toys! Ninja have a rest! And missiles from tubes and paper soaked with saltpeter ... Which WATHUNDER? Zarnitsa, fishing, at a distance of thirty kilometers, home-made mopeds with the D-5 or D-6 engine, cordial airplanes with the engines on the air ... Shotgun with salt is the deadliest weapon.

But seriously, how will all the weapons listed in the article behave at low temperatures? And that’s all ...

[bastard]

Quote: Andrey NM

And instead of magnesium, they sawed old aircraft wheels of the chassis, they are made of AMG alloy. And also sodium and potassium were thrown into the water ... And what fumes from tennis balls and celluloid toys! Ninja have a rest! And missiles from tubes and paper soaked with saltpeter ... Which WATHUNDER? Zarnitsa, fishing, at a distance of thirty kilometers, home-made mopeds with the D-5 or D-6 engine, cordial airplanes with the engines on the air ... Shotgun with salt is the deadliest weapon.
But seriously, how will all the weapons listed in the article behave at low temperatures?

Oh, how the heart pounded, there was time. . .
I don’t know in the article, but all of the above in your commentary, including D-5 and D-6, as well as arsonists and hens worked perfectly in conditions of both low and high temperatures.

[aleks 62 next]

..... saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...
Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))

..... Forgot another 4-6% of dry sawdust .... It turns out industrial explosives - ammonal ...

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: vorobey

Quote: DEZINTO

Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....

saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

Sasha! you that ... this ... can knock on the door!

[vorobey]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

Sasha! you that ... this ... can knock on the door!

Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.

[Ruslan67]

Quote: vorobey

Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.

And in mixed too

[bastard]

Quote: vorobey

Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.

Quote: Ruslan67

And in mixed too

We observe the safety precautions strictly!

[33 Watcher]

Oh well, everyone knows who is older than 30.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons

in capable hands any crap is a deadly weapon.

[222222]

The National Interest spoke about NATO's deadliest weapons "
Nonsense...
..the NATO’s deadliest weapon is pseudo democracy. which they carry to the world.
We look .. LIVIA .. Tranquility and grace .. Peace and order. NATO has come. Chaos. mess. thousands of refugees .. to the same Europe ..

[vorobey]

abrams --- cross out ... blown off an ace ..

National Interest named five types of weapons of Russia, which the United States fear

The first place is taken by the Su-35 multirole fighter
Second on the list is the non-nuclear submarine Amur.
Third place in the ranking is occupied by the Russian tank T-90
The fourth in the list of The National Interest is the Russian universal anti-ship missile P-800 Onyx,
Closing the top five anti-ship steam-gas peroxide-hydrogen torpedoes "53-65",

http://tehnowar.ru/15422-national-interest-nazval-pyat-vidov-vooruzheniy-rossii-
kotoryh-boyatsya-ssha.html

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: vorobey

abrams --- cross out ... blown off an ace ..

F 22, too, along with missile destroyers. Although I think that this Kyle Marazmakami simply did not know about the existence of Abrams and F 22.
He finds out in surprise then.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: vorobey

Closing the top five ...

Sasha, where's the MSL?

[vorobey]

Quote: Andrey Yurievich

and where is MSL

the engineer is only BSL ... Andrey, you probably mean the infantry shoulder ..

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: vorobey

you probably mean an infantry shoulder blade ..

Well! (where-how they call)

[AndreyS]

Quote: vorobey

you probably mean an infantry shoulder blade ..

In many sources and ministries, an infantry shovel is called a small infantry shovel! And many call it a small sapper shovel (MSL)!

[Sanain]

Their weapons are "unimportant" to put it mildly.

PS In what century do they live to show off like that?

[rotmistr60]

Especially small. Well, maybe with the exception of sniper rifles, and that is a big question today.

[KazaK Bo]

Sanain
Their weapons are "unimportant" to put it mildly.
PS In what century do they live to show off like that?

Whether this weapon is important or not, it has become widespread and has gone through the "practice of using" in many hot spots ... And since this weapon is still in the arsenals of our opponents, it means that it is not so "unimportant". Therefore, there is no need to "throw caps over it" ... It is better to understand well the essence of why this weapon is popular ... and AFTER THE CORRECT EVALUATION of their performance characteristics, CREATE OUR SAMPLES, BETTER ON THE HEAD !!!
And, judging by the information available in the open press, it is along this path that our defense industry is following and has already created quite a few samples of weapons ... when studying which, our "sworn partners" can only lick their lips! ...

[31rus]

Quite rightly write, "playing on opinion", in fact, more and more open preparation for war in politics and economics

[31rus]

Quite rightly write, "playing on opinion", in fact, more and more open preparation for war in politics and economics

[rotmistr60]

For KazaK Bo

it is not so "unimportant". Therefore, there is no need to "throw caps over it."

No one throws hats, but if you understand small arms, then it’s a shame to say so. Did you yourself have to shoot American weapons in the arsenal of the army?

since this weapon is still in the arsenals of our opponents, it means that it is not so "unimportant"

It's just a matter of American marketing. Excuse me, they will also give out and sell shit for candy.

[Sanain]

Our samples are not inferior to them in any way, but on the contrary, in a number of characteristics they will be a couple of goals higher. Because we, unlike them, are creating new weapons, and they are only busy trying to modernize trash from the 80s.

And as practice has shown, Abrams are burning from RPGs, Fk are blind, like flies without ground aiming, machine guns overheat and wedge. Of all this, only howitzers are more or less, but I'm sorry 155 mm, this is not serious, modern tanks have 150 mm guns.

It would be sad for you, but for the most part, NATO uses the old trash that was developed back in the 80s and no matter how modernized it is, they are clearly inferior to new generations of machines, which are being introduced into the army at an accelerated pace.

[Sivan]

Quote: sanain

Of all this, only howitzers are more or less, but I'm sorry 155 mm, this is not serious, modern tanks have 150 mm guns.

What kind of nonsense? What tanks are these guns on? In the western countries, 120 mm is everywhere (although they develop 140 mm). We have 125 mm, except for the experimental object 195 (there are 152 mm).

[roskot]

What scare, but now I’ll call my homies.

[oleg-gr]

Something a little listed. Where are the praised Abrams, Raptors, and other weapons?

[Abakan]

drive her))))

[hydrox]

Well, and why is there a particularly fatal, terribly successful and extremely deadly (perhaps a pan-waffle - so dozens of shots and a barrel to replace! Such a damn weapon?
Inspire your own or scare ours?
Something I don’t think can be scared of ours by causals ...

[Mama_Cholli]

In vain you are so, the Nenmen people know how to make technique.
)))
The gun is really good.
As for small arms, this is a 50/50 question. Watching in which hands it will be used. It happens that the old Berdan is deadlier than a 50-caliber sniper rifle ...

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Mama_Cholli

Nenmen people are able to do the technique.

Judging by the letters, this is a hybrid of a reindeer sleigh with a BMW

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Mama_Cholli

The gun is really good.

still ... wherever you look, everywhere she is, even on the Korean "panther".

[Sivan]

Do not confuse the Rh-120 tank gun with the PzH-2000 howitzer, which is discussed in the article. Although both guns are good.

However, our new 2A82 tank gun is better than the Rh-120 (1,2 times more powerful in muzzle energy). It is on the T-14 and T-90SM.
And the Coalition-SV howitzer is a direct competitor to the PzH-2000.

[kursk87]

Each sandpiper praises its swamp

[Altona]

I thought ... ANALiteg, also to me ... There are good weapons there, but not the ones listed ...

[rotmistr60]

First on the list is the F-16 Fighting Falcon multirole fighter

When the United States compiles this list, it will naturally put in the first place the products of its defense industry. But the Western man in the street completely trusts this nonsense.

[halzan7]

only in real conditions, both in Vietnam and in Afghanistan, use our AK.

[VP]

950 at an assault rifle, but is it necessary?
ETOGES is not a machine gun.
To drop a horn in one and a half seconds is not the best thing that can happen.

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: VP

950 at an assault rifle, but is it necessary?

and if 950 attackers ?!

[VP]

Then boots-walkers will be more necessary than a gun-speed gun

[Tusv]

Also in the top there is a Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle with a 20-inch barrel

Introduced a 20-inch gun (intentionally) and who drags him, that one comes first
PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

[Andrey Yuryevich]

Quote: Tusv

PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

FSE tied to the buck ...

[bastard]

Quote: Tusv

Introduced a 20 inch gun (intentionally intentionally) and whoever drags him, that is exactly in the first place
PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

They sell an inch for 25.4 mm, and carry a Schwarzenegger, Chuckie Norris and Very Strong Nuts. But they are looking for an artist, such a goon, he often portrays bad Russians.

[AUL]

And it never occurred to anyone that the barrel, besides caliber, also has a length?
Home-made wits ...

[Tusv]

Quote: Aul

And it never occurred to anyone that the barrel, besides caliber, also has a length?
Home-made wits ..

Come on. So it’s clear that in length. Just the text is ambiguous. And to cheer up on Monday

[Vasilenko Vladimir]

in fact, it seems that not the most deadly, but the most common in NATO are listed

[HAM]

The most common NATO sunglasses and the deadly "Coca-Cola" are nowhere without them. (Joke of humor)

[VP]

In my opinion, there are some craps in this NI. Lists from the nose gouge out.

[31rus]

And what is this rating? Reconnaissance, missile systems, and then aviation, and then only conciliatory for Europe (in other areas of the fleet), are trying to rub in what kind of "sheep" they are, we know you are a bitch tribe

[uav80]

Quote: Tusv

Introduced a 20 inch gun (intentionally intentionally) and whoever drags him, that is exactly in the first place
PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

It’s kind of like they wanted to say by the length of the barrel of 508 mm, but it turned out as usual clumsily, they transferred Google to the campaign ...

[Wedmak]

Some kind of a strange choice.
F-16, although it is a mass fighter of NATO, but F-15E / D somehow does not reach lethality.
Panzerhaubitze 2000, oh her. But what about MLRS?
Submarines okay, maybe so.
Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle - is that how the M16 was technically lowered?
Machine gun xs, I do not really think about them.

[79807420129]

I want to ask the author: And Cho?

[Vladimir 1964]

A strange publication, it is absolutely not clear what purpose its author pursued by publishing it on the site. And once again, an empty article that does not carry any information has not been signed. I do not blame the initiator of this "rating" Kyle Mizokami, he carried nonsense, these are his problems, but the person who published this nonsense on our website irritates me.
I have the honor of colleagues.

[BOB044]

The analyst is interesting. The howitzer is excellent but the barrel warms up a problem, and so with all the weapons. He probably smokes something.

[bastard]

Quote: BOB044

The analyst is interesting. The howitzer is excellent but the barrel warms up a problem, and so with all the weapons. He probably smokes something.

Probably an analyst from the word "ANAL", well, he smokes, of course chevy. The instructions for the mixer also say: 10 min. work, 15 min. break.

[roskot]

Looks like a couch analyst. All that he wrote about the most deadly weapons is informative for elementary school students.

[Al Asad]

With the F-16 did not disgrace at least. Look at the statistics of the catastrophe of this destroyer. 5 units fell from the beginning of the year around the world

[X Y Z]

If the author had as his goal to scare us, then somehow it did not work out. For us, coca and Pepsi-cola, fanta, McDonald's, burgers of all stripes, chips and snacks are more scary and dangerous. There is a great danger over time to become an analogue of the thick-walled American nation with all its attendant consequences.

[Wolka]

the devil is not so formidable as he is painted ...

[Vitaly Anisimov]

Well, I don’t know what is the deadliest and anyone ..... But nature intuitively feels who can protect! You can not argue with nature ....

[Tusv]

Quote: MIKHAN

You can not argue with nature ...

I am waiting for an article about how evil Russian submariners drove a poor animal to death. They have no idea that sunbathing on a Russian submarine is much safer

[Oman 47]

Advertising old junk.

[Volzhanin]

We still need to be able to fight with weapons.
Of the NATO soldiers, their feces are a bullet. And they never had warriors.