Military Review

The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons

87
The National Interest columnist Kyle Mizokami spoke about the most deadly weapons of the North Atlantic alliance. His rating leads RIA "News".




First on the list is the F-16 Fighting Falcon multi-role fighter, which, according to Mizoki, is the “most common fighter” of NATO. Various modifications of the aircraft used by the Air Force of Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Greece, Poland, Norway, Turkey, Portugal and the United States.

The next is the German self-propelled howitzer Panzerhaubitze 2000, which, according to the observer, is one of the most advanced artillery systems used by the military alliance. PzH 2000 has a gun in 155-mm in 52 caliber capable of producing three shots in nine seconds, but its speed is unstable due to problems with overheating of the barrel.

In third place in the list of the most deadly weapons of the North Atlantic alliance were submarines of the 212 project, called the most advanced NATO diesel submarines. According to Mizokami, they are “extremely quiet” and were designed to patrol the Mediterranean and Baltic seas. The observer notes that the German military equipped these submarines with Sea Hake torpedoes, and the Italian - Black Shark.

Also in the top there is an assault rifle Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel and semi-automatic and fully automatic fire. Its rate of fire ranges from 750 to 950 rounds per minute.

Closes the top five leaders of the general purpose machine gun FN MAG, used by almost all NATO countries, including Canada, Belgium, France, Denmark, Luxembourg, Greece, the Netherlands, Turkey, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States. Its caliber is 7.62-mm, the rate of fire is from 650 to 950 shots per minute. In addition, the FN MAG machine gun uses a system for quickly replacing the superheated barrel.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
87 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dezinto
    Dezinto 7 September 2015 09: 23 New
    +33
    Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....



    Neither system nor classification ...
    1. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 7 September 2015 09: 29 New
      +19
      It is not entirely clear what they generally mean by "the most deadly weapons." Because I have associations not with technology, but rather with nuclear weapons, chemical and bacteriological weapons, cluster munitions ...
      1. Shadowcat
        Shadowcat 7 September 2015 09: 38 New
        +1
        Well, they simply cannot be recognized + some of them have signed or ratified the convention, so they can’t use cluster munitions for example.
        1. Now we are free
          Now we are free 7 September 2015 09: 41 New
          +30
          And what does this “news” have to say? For each of the given NATO weapons, the Russian Federation and the CSTO have equivalent answers in the same categories:
          F-16 (another question in what modifications) -Mig-29 / K / 35.
          PzH 2000 (another question in what quantities) -MSTA-S / Coalition
          Submarines of project 212 (another question in what quantities) -Submarines of project 636 "Varshavyanka"
          Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ... laughing ) -Ak-74M / Ak-103 and separately AK-12
          General-purpose machine gun FN MAG (here I agree Belgians made a cool machine gun, but I would still prefer MG-42 oh, MG-3 laughing ) -PKMN and separately Pecheneg.

          PS
          Yes, and what does NATO have with a Tunguska / Shell shell, where missile and cannon weapons are combined?
          What is it with a large-caliber machine gun like "KORD" which can fire from a bipod?
          What is there with the "ADS" two-machine gun? Having the ability to fire both under water and on land WITHOUT CHANGE OF AMMUNITION.
          What’s wrong with the BMD-1/2/3/4 / 4M, SPRUT (with a full 125 mm tank gun and the ability to fire from the water), parachuted from a landing using parachutes?
          What’s wrong with the Dzhigit MANPADS, which can fire two missiles at the same time?
          Etc. etc. and notice, without any "hatred" ...
          1. DenZ
            DenZ 7 September 2015 09: 50 New
            +1
            Alas, the project 212 boats have in. independent power plant and Varshavyanka left behind. Let's hope that ours will finish the Russian VNU and we will level our chances.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. bastard
            bastard 7 September 2015 10: 16 New
            +8
            Quote: Now we are free
            Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ...

            Well, yes, an assault rifle with a hollow of 508 mm (half a meter!!!!). . . Yes, there a dog can live!
            I'll be right back, I'll go change my pants. . .
            1. ziqzaq
              ziqzaq 7 September 2015 14: 02 New
              +1
              Quote: villain
              Well, yes, an assault rifle with a hollow of 508 mm (half a meter!!!!). . . Yes, there a dog can live!

              Perhaps the barrel length was meant?
              1. bastard
                bastard 7 September 2015 19: 03 New
                0
                Quote: ziqzaq
                Perhaps the barrel length was meant?

                Well, I would have written.
          4. boruta
            boruta 7 September 2015 10: 26 New
            -41
            Quote: Now we are free
            And what does this “news” have to say? For each of the given NATO weapons, the Russian Federation and the CSTO have equivalent answers in the same categories:
            F-16 (another question in what modifications) -Mig-29 / K / 35.
            PzH 2000 (another question in what quantities) -MSTA-S / Coalition
            Submarines of project 212 (another question in what quantities) -Submarines of project 636 "Varshavyanka"
            Colt Canada C7A1 with a 20-inch barrel (well, yes 20 Inch. The barrel is seriously ... laughing ) -Ak-74M / Ak-103 and separately AK-12
            General-purpose machine gun FN MAG (here I agree Belgians made a cool machine gun, but I would still prefer MG-42 oh, MG-3 laughing ) -PKMN and separately Pecheneg.

            PS
            Yes, and what does NATO have with a Tunguska / Shell shell, where missile and cannon weapons are combined?
            What is it with a large-caliber machine gun like "KORD" which can fire from a bipod?
            What is there with the "ADS" two-machine gun? Having the ability to fire both under water and on land WITHOUT CHANGE OF AMMUNITION.
            What’s wrong with the BMD-1/2/3/4 / 4M, SPRUT (with a full 125 mm tank gun and the ability to fire from the water), parachuted from a landing using parachutes?
            What’s wrong with the Dzhigit MANPADS, which can fire two missiles at the same time?
            Etc. etc. and notice, without any "hatred" ...

            It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse
            1. vorobey
              vorobey 7 September 2015 10: 36 New
              +8
              Quote: boruta
              It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse


              Yes Yes...
            2. bastard
              bastard 7 September 2015 10: 36 New
              +11
              Quote: boruta
              It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

              Yeah, your Polish, of course, is better.
            3. tol100v
              tol100v 7 September 2015 10: 43 New
              +9
              Quote: boruta
              but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse

              Take and try on yourself! And so far no one has complained and made no complaints!
              1. Kibalchish
                Kibalchish 7 September 2015 13: 03 New
                +2
                There is simply no one to complain about. Those against whom it was used were silent forever no
              2. bastard
                bastard 7 September 2015 14: 25 New
                +2
                Quote: boruta
                in reality, soviet weapons are much worse

                Quote: Tol100v
                Take and try on yourself! And so far no one has complained and made no complaints!

                In Africa, a black man bought a potion from a local sorcerer, such as bullets, put a bottle in himself and asked his corefan to shoot from the Kalash, sort of like full-scale tests. Koresh put a horn in him. Dude was given the Darwin Prize (posthumously).
                Kind boruta! I already made the potion. Inform the address in Poland, I will send for free. For friends, do not mind.
            4. Karayakupovo
              Karayakupovo 7 September 2015 11: 23 New
              +4
              Well yes. And for some reason, the demand for our weapons is increasing. Do not tell me why? You can even mention the word "price-quality". I would add the word brand.
            5. Jackking
              Jackking 7 September 2015 11: 25 New
              0
              A rifle with a barrel of 20 inches is not on paper? And where did the vaunted M4 go - apparently, the barrel length let us down :)))
              And as for the fact that Soviet weapons are much worse, I would like more details and details. It is "worse" only in that it does not drive countries into the Stone Age (Libya, Iraq), but terrifies the litter
            6. Dazdranagon
              Dazdranagon 7 September 2015 11: 47 New
              +1
              Quote: boruta
              It may be on paper, but in reality Soviet weapons are much worse
              - of course! Indeed, therefore, around the world, AK has received recognition! Where do you get out of? Apple overeaten? laughing
            7. Tusv
              Tusv 7 September 2015 11: 49 New
              0
              Quote: It may be on paper, but in reality, Soviet weapons are much worse [/ quote

              Then the pilots of twenty-seventh dryers for one patrol of five NATO shifts showed: "Bye bye, goryadyk kirdyk." The aircraft carriers they have it. Fact. Well, diesel on submarines is still better than ours. For everything else, at least parity. And air defense systems are space for them. half a century behind
            8. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 7 September 2015 13: 47 New
              0
              And specifically, you used a lot of Soviet weapons?
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. igordok
        igordok 7 September 2015 13: 30 New
        0
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        It is not entirely clear what they generally mean by "the most deadly weapons." Because I have associations not with technology, but rather with nuclear weapons, chemical and bacteriological weapons, cluster munitions ...

        The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons

        How many were killed with the F-16, Panzerhaubitze 2000, the 212 project submarine, the Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle and the FN MAG?
        WMD will destroy millions at a time, and if you take unlimited time, then the Mosin and Mauser rifles have surpassed everyone.
      3. gjv
        gjv 8 September 2015 11: 18 New
        0
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        It is not entirely clear what they generally mean by "the most deadly weapons."

        For example, the FN MAG (M240) (7.62) is in service with 117 countries. The most famous wars and conflicts: Doomsday War, War of Attrition, Six Day War, War of Independence of Namibia, Civil War in Libya, Falkland War, Gulf War, Iraq War, War in Afghanistan (since 2001), War in Afghanistan ( since 2015), Congolese crisis. In these and other nicks, the FN MAG helped a lot with the old woman with the scythe.
    2. vorobey
      vorobey 7 September 2015 09: 33 New
      +9
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....


      saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...
      1. vodolaz
        vodolaz 7 September 2015 09: 35 New
        +5
        Quote: vorobey

        saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

        Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))
        1. Dezinto
          Dezinto 7 September 2015 09: 37 New
          +7
          Quote: vodolaz
          Quote: vorobey

          saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

          Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))


          Balcony...

          - And then shshshuheer!
          1. Andrey NM
            Andrey NM 7 September 2015 09: 51 New
            +3
            Siphon spray can, magnesium, nitrate, sulfur from matches, hunting matches. Boom!
            1. DenZ
              DenZ 7 September 2015 09: 57 New
              +4
              Nanado! Nostalgia tortured and surging memories.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. bastard
              bastard 7 September 2015 10: 46 New
              +3
              Quote: Andrew NM
              Siphon spray can, magnesium, nitrate, sulfur from matches, hunting matches. Boom!

              We saw with a file a block or a box from Zaporozhets (magnesium alloy), add a little potassium permanganate (for schoolchildren: potassium permanganate, hormula - KMnO4). . . Class! ! !
              They also communicated Bertoletov’s salt from the chemistry cabinet, also weigh!

              It used to be that we went to a steel rolling plant, you could go freely or through a fence, such as a folder, you would take saltpeter, charcoal and piercing, make racquets themselves, explosive packets. Ehhh! Golden childhood! We lived more interesting than the current kids, even though we had no tablets.
              Now shkolota buys ready firecrackers, unhappy children! All for the money.
              1. vorobey
                vorobey 7 September 2015 11: 09 New
                +2
                Quote: villain
                Sawing a block file


                Rospotrebnadzor will be drawn now and will ban both you and us and VO ..
                1. Ruslan67
                  Ruslan67 7 September 2015 11: 11 New
                  +4
                  Quote: vorobey
                  Rospotrebnadzor will now be drawn

                  After that, we saw with renewed energy and ... T-shirts with the inscription-I Rospotrebnadzor come into fashion wassat
                2. bastard
                  bastard 7 September 2015 11: 30 New
                  0
                  Quote: vorobey
                  Rospotrebnadzor will be drawn now and will ban both you and us and VO ..

                  So, "Zaporozhets" is no longer produced, and only British scientists can do a controlled reaction to transform cast iron into magnesium (theoretically, kaneshno!). wassat
                  Yes, and I grew up a long time ago. (Oh, sorry!)
              2. Andrey NM
                Andrey NM 7 September 2015 13: 29 New
                +2
                And instead of magnesium, they sawed old aircraft wheels of the chassis, they are made of AMG alloy. And also sodium and potassium were thrown into the water ... And what fumes from tennis balls and celluloid toys! Ninja have a rest! And missiles from tubes and paper soaked with saltpeter ... Which WATHUNDER? Zarnitsa, fishing, at a distance of thirty kilometers, home-made mopeds with the D-5 or D-6 engine, cordial airplanes with the engines on the air ... Shotgun with salt is the deadliest weapon.

                But seriously, how will all the weapons listed in the article behave at low temperatures? And that’s all ...
                1. bastard
                  bastard 7 September 2015 20: 51 New
                  0
                  Quote: Andrew NM
                  And instead of magnesium, they sawed old aircraft wheels of the chassis, they are made of AMG alloy. And also sodium and potassium were thrown into the water ... And what fumes from tennis balls and celluloid toys! Ninja have a rest! And missiles from tubes and paper soaked with saltpeter ... Which WATHUNDER? Zarnitsa, fishing, at a distance of thirty kilometers, home-made mopeds with the D-5 or D-6 engine, cordial airplanes with the engines on the air ... Shotgun with salt is the deadliest weapon.
                  But seriously, how will all the weapons listed in the article behave at low temperatures?

                  Oh, how the heart pounded, there was time. . .
                  I don’t know in the article, but all of the above in your commentary, including D-5 and D-6, as well as arsonists and hens worked perfectly in conditions of both low and high temperatures.
        2. aleks 62 next
          aleks 62 next 8 September 2015 15: 15 New
          0
          ..... saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...
          Two bolts, nut, sulfur from matches)))

          ..... Forgot another 4-6% of dry sawdust .... It turns out industrial explosives - ammonal ... laughing hi
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 43 New
        +2
        Quote: vorobey
        Quote: DEZINTO
        Soap, chalk, machine gun and nails ....


        saltpeter, aluminum powder, matches ...

        Sasha! you that ... this ... can knock on the door! belay wink
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 7 September 2015 09: 51 New
          +5
          Quote: Andrew Y.
          Sasha! you that ... this ... can knock on the door!


          Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.
          1. Ruslan67
            Ruslan67 7 September 2015 09: 53 New
            +3
            Quote: vorobey
            Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.

            And in mixed too laughing
            1. bastard
              bastard 7 September 2015 11: 03 New
              +2
              Quote: vorobey
              Do not store horseradish in assembled condition.

              Quote: Ruslan67
              And in mixed too

              We observe the safety precautions strictly! soldier
        2. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 7 September 2015 13: 51 New
          0
          Oh well, everyone knows who is older than 30.
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 41 New
      +4
      The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons
      in capable hands any crap is a deadly weapon.
    4. 222222
      222222 7 September 2015 12: 19 New
      +1
      The National Interest talks about NATO’s deadliest weapons
      Nonsense...
      ..the NATO’s deadliest weapon is pseudo democracy. which they carry to the world.
      We look .. LIVIA .. Tranquility and grace .. Peace and order. NATO has come. Chaos. mess. thousands of refugees .. to the same Europe .. laughing
  2. vorobey
    vorobey 7 September 2015 09: 23 New
    +9
    abrams --- cross out ... blown off an ace ..

    National Interest named five types of weapons of Russia, which the United States fear

    The first place is taken by the Su-35 multirole fighter
    Second on the list is the non-nuclear submarine Amur.
    Third place in the ranking is occupied by the Russian tank T-90
    The fourth in the list of The National Interest is the Russian universal anti-ship missile P-800 Onyx,
    Closing the top five anti-ship steam-gas peroxide-hydrogen torpedoes "53-65",

    http://tehnowar.ru/15422-national-interest-nazval-pyat-vidov-vooruzheniy-rossii-
    kotoryh-boyatsya-ssha.html
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 7 September 2015 09: 31 New
      +3
      Quote: vorobey
      abrams --- cross out ... blown off an ace ..

      F 22, too, along with missile destroyers. Although I think that this Kyle Marazmakami simply did not know about the existence of Abrams and F 22.
      He finds out in surprise then.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 44 New
      +2
      Quote: vorobey
      Closing the top five ...

      Sasha, where's the MSL? what
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 7 September 2015 10: 22 New
        +1
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        and where is MSL


        the engineer is only BSL ... Andrey, you probably mean the infantry shoulder ..
        1. Andrey Yuryevich
          Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 10: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          you probably mean an infantry shoulder blade ..

          Well! yes(where-how they call)
        2. AndreyS
          AndreyS 7 September 2015 11: 28 New
          +1
          Quote: vorobey
          you probably mean an infantry shoulder blade ..

          In many sources and ministries, an infantry shovel is called a small infantry shovel! And many call it a small sapper shovel (MSL)!
  3. sanain
    sanain 7 September 2015 09: 23 New
    +1
    Their weapons are, to say the least, "unimportant."

    PS In what century do they live to show off like that?
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 7 September 2015 09: 31 New
      +1
      Especially small. Well, maybe with the exception of sniper rifles, and that is a big question today.
    2. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 7 September 2015 09: 38 New
      +3
      sanain
      Their weapons are, to say the least, "unimportant."
      PS In what century do they live to show off like that?

      Whether this weapon is important or not, but it has become widespread and has passed the "practice of use" in many hot spots ... And since this weapon is still in the arsenals of our opponents, it means that it is not so "unimportant". Therefore, it is not necessary to “throw it with hats” ... It is better to understand the essence of why this weapon is popular ... and AFTER the CORE ASSESSMENT of their performance characteristics, CREATE OUR SAMPLES, ON THE HEAD BETTER !!!
      And, judging by the information available in the open press, it is along this path that our defense industry goes and has created quite a few weapons samples ... when studied, our "sworn partners" can only lick their lips! ...
      1. 31rus
        31rus 7 September 2015 09: 50 New
        +1
        Write perfectly correctly, "play on opinion", in fact, an increasingly open preparation for war in both politics and economics
      2. 31rus
        31rus 7 September 2015 09: 50 New
        -1
        Write perfectly correctly, "play on opinion", in fact, an increasingly open preparation for war in both politics and economics
      3. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 7 September 2015 10: 38 New
        +1
        For KazaK Bo
        it’s not so "unimportant." Therefore, it is not necessary to "throw it with hats."

        No one throws hats, but if you understand small arms, then it’s a shame to say so. Did you yourself have to shoot American weapons in the arsenal of the army?
        since this weapon is still in the arsenals of our opponents, it means that it’s not so "unimportant"

        It's just a matter of American marketing. Excuse me, they will also give out and sell shit for candy.
      4. sanain
        sanain 7 September 2015 10: 56 New
        +1
        Our samples are not inferior to them in any way, but on the contrary, in a number of characteristics they will be a couple of goals higher. Because we, unlike them, are creating new weapons, and they are only busy trying to modernize trash from the 80s.

        And as practice has shown, Abrams are burning from RPGs, Fk are blind, like flies without ground aiming, machine guns overheat and wedge. Of all this, only howitzers are more or less, but I'm sorry 155 mm, this is not serious, modern tanks have 150 mm guns.

        It would be sad for you, but for the most part, NATO uses the old trash that was developed back in the 80s and no matter how modernized it is, they are clearly inferior to new generations of machines, which are being introduced into the army at an accelerated pace.
        1. SIvan
          SIvan 7 September 2015 11: 17 New
          0
          Quote: sanain
          Of all this, only howitzers are more or less, but I'm sorry 155 mm, this is not serious, modern tanks have 150 mm guns.

          What kind of nonsense? What tanks are these guns on? In the western countries, 120 mm is everywhere (although they develop 140 mm). We have 125 mm, except for the experimental object 195 (there are 152 mm).
  4. roskot
    roskot 7 September 2015 09: 25 New
    0
    What scare, but now I’ll call my homies.
  5. oleg-gr
    oleg-gr 7 September 2015 09: 25 New
    +2
    Something a little listed. Where are the praised Abrams, Raptors, and other weapons?
  6. Abakan
    Abakan 7 September 2015 09: 26 New
    0
    drive her))))
  7. hydrox
    hydrox 7 September 2015 09: 26 New
    +2
    Well, and why is there a particularly fatal, terribly successful and extremely deadly (perhaps a pan-waffle - so dozens of shots and a barrel to replace! Such a damn weapon?
    Inspire your own or scare ours?
    Something I don’t think can be scared of ours by causals ... no
    1. Mama_Cholli
      Mama_Cholli 7 September 2015 09: 39 New
      +2
      In vain you are so, the Nenmen people know how to make technique.
      )))
      The gun is really good.
      As for small arms, this is a 50/50 question. Watching in which hands it will be used. It happens that the old Berdan is deadlier than a 50-caliber sniper rifle ...
      1. Ruslan67
        Ruslan67 7 September 2015 09: 44 New
        +2
        Quote: Mama_Cholli
        Nenmen people are able to do the technique.

        Judging by the letters, this is a hybrid of a reindeer sleigh with a BMW laughing hi
      2. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 46 New
        0
        Quote: Mama_Cholli
        The gun is really good.

        still ... wherever you look, everywhere she is, even on the Korean "panther".
        1. SIvan
          SIvan 7 September 2015 11: 22 New
          0
          Do not confuse the Rh-120 tank gun with the PzH-2000 howitzer, which is discussed in the article. Although both guns are good.

          However, our new 2A82 tank gun is better than the Rh-120 (1,2 times more powerful in muzzle energy). It is on the T-14 and T-90SM.
          And the Coalition-SV howitzer is a direct competitor to the PzH-2000.
  8. kursk87
    kursk87 7 September 2015 09: 26 New
    +1
    Each sandpiper praises its swamp
  9. Altona
    Altona 7 September 2015 09: 29 New
    0
    I thought ... ANALiteg, also to me ... There are good weapons there, but not the ones listed ...
  10. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 7 September 2015 09: 29 New
    0
    First on the list is the F-16 Fighting Falcon multirole fighter

    When the United States compiles this list, it will naturally put in the first place the products of its defense industry. But the Western man in the street completely trusts this nonsense.
    1. halzan7
      halzan7 7 September 2015 10: 26 New
      +4
      only in real conditions, both in Vietnam and in Afghanistan, use our AK.
  11. VP
    VP 7 September 2015 09: 30 New
    +4
    950 at an assault rifle, but is it necessary?
    ETOGES is not a machine gun.
    To drop a horn in one and a half seconds is not the best thing that can happen.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 47 New
      -1
      Quote: VP
      950 at an assault rifle, but is it necessary?

      and if 950 attackers ?! wassat
      1. VP
        VP 7 September 2015 09: 58 New
        +3
        Then boots-walkers will be more necessary than a gun-speed gun
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. Tusv
    Tusv 7 September 2015 09: 33 New
    +1
    Also in the top there is a Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle with a 20-inch barrel

    Introduced a 20-inch gun (intentionally) and who drags him, fellow that one comes first
    PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 7 September 2015 09: 48 New
      0
      Quote: Tusv
      PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

      FSE tied to the buck ... recourse
    2. bastard
      bastard 7 September 2015 10: 27 New
      0
      Quote: Tusv
      Introduced a 20 inch gun (intentionally intentionally) and whoever drags him, that is exactly in the first place
      PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

      They sell an inch for 25.4 mm, and carry a Schwarzenegger, Chuckie Norris and Very Strong Nuts. But they are looking for an artist, such a goon, he often portrays bad Russians. bully
      1. AUL
        AUL 7 September 2015 10: 57 New
        +1
        And it never occurred to anyone that the barrel, besides caliber, also has a length?
        Home-made wits ...
        1. Tusv
          Tusv 7 September 2015 11: 33 New
          0
          Quote: Aul
          And it never occurred to anyone that the barrel, besides caliber, also has a length?
          Home-made wits ..

          Come on. So it’s clear that in length. Just the text is ambiguous. And to cheer up on Monday
  15. Vasilenko Vladimir
    Vasilenko Vladimir 7 September 2015 09: 36 New
    +1
    in fact, it seems that not the most deadly, but the most common in NATO are listed
    1. HAM
      HAM 7 September 2015 09: 52 New
      +1
      The most common in NATO sunglasses and the deadly Coca-Cola - without them anywhere. (Humor joke)
  16. VP
    VP 7 September 2015 09: 36 New
    +2
    In my opinion, there are some craps in this NI. Lists from the nose gouge out.
  17. 31rus
    31rus 7 September 2015 09: 47 New
    0
    And what is this rating? Intelligence, missile systems, and then aviation, and then only conciliatory for Europe (in other areas of the fleet), are trying to rub what kind of “sheep” they are, we know you bitch-tribe
  18. uav80
    uav80 7 September 2015 09: 48 New
    +2
    Quote: Tusv
    Introduced a 20 inch gun (intentionally intentionally) and whoever drags him, that is exactly in the first place
    PS: And at what rate are they selling an inch now?

    It’s kind of like they wanted to say by the length of the barrel of 508 mm, but it turned out as usual clumsily, they transferred Google to the campaign ...
  19. Wedmak
    Wedmak 7 September 2015 09: 51 New
    0
    Some kind of a strange choice.
    F-16, although it is a mass fighter of NATO, but F-15E / D somehow does not reach lethality.
    Panzerhaubitze 2000, oh her. But what about MLRS?
    Submarines okay, maybe so.
    Colt Canada C7A1 assault rifle - is that how the M16 was technically lowered?
    Machine gun xs, I do not really think about them.
  20. 79807420129
    79807420129 7 September 2015 09: 53 New
    +12
    I want to ask the author: And Cho?
  21. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 7 September 2015 09: 54 New
    +1
    A strange publication, it is absolutely not clear what purpose the author pursued by publishing it on the site. And once again, an empty article that does not carry any information is not signed. I do not blame the initiator of this "rating" Kyle Mizokami, he brought nonsense, these are his problems, but the person who posted this nonsense on our website causes me irritation.
    I have the honor of colleagues.
  22. BOB044
    BOB044 7 September 2015 10: 00 New
    +1
    The analyst is interesting. The howitzer is excellent but the barrel warms up a problem, and so with all the weapons. He probably smokes something. laughing
    1. bastard
      bastard 7 September 2015 10: 34 New
      0
      Quote: BOB044
      The analyst is interesting. The howitzer is excellent but the barrel warms up a problem, and so with all the weapons. He probably smokes something.

      Probably the analyst from the word "ANAL", well, smokes, of course chevy. The mixer manual also says: 10 min. work, 15 minutes break.
  23. roskot
    roskot 7 September 2015 10: 26 New
    0
    Looks like a couch analyst. All that he wrote about the most deadly weapons is informative for elementary school students.
  24. Al Asad
    Al Asad 7 September 2015 10: 37 New
    0
    With the F-16 did not disgrace at least. Look at the statistics of the catastrophe of this destroyer. 5 units fell from the beginning of the year around the world
  25. X Y Z
    X Y Z 7 September 2015 10: 49 New
    +1
    If the author had as his goal to scare us, then somehow it did not work out. For us, coca and Pepsi-cola, fanta, McDonald's, burgers of all stripes, chips and snacks are more scary and dangerous. There is a great danger over time to become an analogue of the thick-walled American nation with all its attendant consequences.
  26. Wolka
    Wolka 7 September 2015 11: 08 New
    0
    the devil is not so formidable as he is painted ... wink
  27. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 7 September 2015 11: 19 New
    +3
    Well, I don’t know what is the deadliest and anyone ..... But nature intuitively feels who can protect! You can not argue with nature .... laughing
    1. Tusv
      Tusv 7 September 2015 11: 59 New
      +1
      Quote: MIKHAN
      You can not argue with nature ...

      I am waiting for an article about how evil Russian submariners drove a poor animal to death. They have no idea that sunbathing on a Russian submarine is much safer laughing
  28. Oman 47
    Oman 47 7 September 2015 11: 21 New
    0
    Advertising old junk.
  29. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 7 September 2015 13: 10 New
    0
    We still need to be able to fight with weapons.
    Of the NATO soldiers, their feces are a bullet. And they never had warriors.