In the LC, there was a training of air defense units

31
The subdivisions of the air defense of the Lugansk Republic held a teaching on Sunday, reports RIA News the message of the commander of the anti-aircraft missile battalion of the People's Militia of the LPR, Vitaly Ugryumov.

In the LC, there was a training of air defense units


“Today we worked out one of the elements of combat training - the action of the division in the offensive, as well as elements of repelling an enemy air raid, passing vehicles through minefields, passing a plot of contaminated terrain,” said Ugryumov.

He noted that "80 percent of the personnel were in the militia since the beginning of the armed conflict."

“They took part in tank battles in Krasnodon, and near Debaltseve were, and participated in the storming of the airport in Lugansk, "- said the commander.

According to Ugryumov, mechanics, miners, teachers, drivers serve in his division.

“Most - people from thirty years. Many of them served in the army, some even in the Soviet Union, so military science is familiar to them, ”he added.
  • novorus.info
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    7 September 2015 08: 17
    It’s interesting where the equipment is from, but Voentorg works and not bad.
    1. +9
      7 September 2015 08: 23
      Since mattress workers support moderate opposition in Syria, why shouldn’t we support our neighbors. wink
      1. +2
        7 September 2015 22: 53
        "GUKTU Since mattress makers support the moderate opposition in Syria, why shouldn't we support our neighbors."
        DO NOT NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT !!! And Russian !!!!
        Less than any nonsense from the West, you need to listen and make excuses before them. For a year and a half, the whole of the South East and the Dniester region would have been part of Russia. And at the same time, the future "maydanutye" in Belarus saw that if something happened they would not see the whole of Belarus. Or you do you think the local dad is eternal?
    2. +2
      7 September 2015 08: 25
      Quote: IGMIT
      It’s interesting where the equipment is from, but Voentorg works and not bad.

      Are you sure that the photo here is not from the outside? You just need to dig into the LPR news, there are more real and event-related photos.
      1. +5
        7 September 2015 08: 41
        I wanted everything to be as it was in the photo
    3. +4
      7 September 2015 08: 30
      From Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
      1. +1
        7 September 2015 09: 19
        Quote: armored optimist
        From Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

        Not necessarily.
        The complex is Soviet, so it’s quite possible for the Ukrainian drapers to drive for a barrel of fat ... fellow
        But why are they without containers?
      2. 0
        7 September 2015 12: 10
        Abkhazia is out of the game. DNR / LC recognized only South Ossetia.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +15
      7 September 2015 08: 30
      Quote: IGMIT
      I wonder where the equipment is from,

      From there
      1. +2
        7 September 2015 08: 53
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: IGMIT
        I wonder where the equipment is from,

        From there

        By the way, given ValmanoWar's craving for arms sales, it is quite possible. Not only "Voentorg" supplies the army of Novorossiya ... I hope for a photo of the OSA-AKM, although the good old 9K33 will do quite well for shooting down the "Banderlets". laughing
        1. +1
          7 September 2015 08: 56
          Quote: Now we are free
          ... Not only "Voentorg" supplies the army of Novorossiya ...


          Similar charges were already that Petyunya sold grenade launchers to the militia ..
      2. The comment was deleted.
    5. +1
      7 September 2015 08: 38
      Yes, in Ukraine, there seems to be no active aviation left. And the Army of New Russia will now finish the last)
    6. 0
      7 September 2015 12: 42
      In both cases, nm is in the anti-aircraft missile division and in the company of electronic warfare. Plus, in motorized rifle brigades, of which 7 pieces (4 in the first building and 3 in the second) are air cover units. So do not forget about air defense. And the EW companies of both buildings also conduct exercises. By the way, a rather interesting fact. Due to the lack of brigades at Lugansk, the seventh separate motorized rifle brigade (based in Debaltseve) was transferred from the first corps (DPR) to the second (LPR). There are rumors that a third corps will be formed - also from parts of the DPR and will be based in the south - in Novoazovsk. Accordingly, he will also be given an EW company and an air defense division. I think that it will be created on the basis of the 9th and 11th Omsp and perhaps they will also give him one of the brigades of the first corps.
  2. +4
    7 September 2015 08: 17
    Another small hint of great circumstances. Now they are ready to make a no-fly zone for Bandera aviation and NATO UAVs in the Donbass.
  3. +6
    7 September 2015 08: 17
    to study military affairs in the present way ... V.I. Lenin

    I would also know the capabilities of the division ... and so I look at the elements of the offensive worked out ..
  4. +2
    7 September 2015 08: 28
    Air Defense Units of the Lugansk Republic

    It is gratifying to hear such a phrase. The creation of its own air defense forces already says a lot. Let them not yet fully strengthened, but the main thing is. Moreover, the junta cannot boast of aviation.
    1. +2
      7 September 2015 08: 42
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Air Defense Units of the Lugansk Republic

      It is gratifying to hear such a phrase. The creation of its own air defense forces already says a lot. Let them not yet fully strengthened, but the main thing is. Moreover, the junta cannot boast of aviation.


      This is a hint to all the friends that are worthless: Aviation equipment is not worth helping.
  5. +7
    7 September 2015 08: 43
    And what, do the APU still have airplanes? “Then there will be no more!”
  6. +1
    7 September 2015 08: 52
    Quote: IGMIT
    I wanted everything to be as it was in the photo


    I hope that the photo is really from the place of events.
    I would like to ask the experts to comment: Can the "Wasp" attack ground targets?
    Thanks in advance.
  7. 0
    7 September 2015 08: 55
    Teaching is always good. Gunpowder must be kept dry.
  8. +1
    7 September 2015 09: 57
    Quote: Polite Elk
    I hope that the photo is really from the scene

    The infa passed that in the winter the LPR militia squeezed out 8 units. "Wasps" at Nevmerliks ​​and a couple more are under repair, and this was the photo, as it were.
    1. +1
      7 September 2015 10: 13
      Quote: Sergey-72
      The infa passed that in the winter the LPR militia squeezed out 8 units. "Wasps" at Nevmerliks ​​and a couple more are under repair, and this was the photo, as it were.


      Well, now, everything falls into place: Khokhlam air defense unnecessarily, because LDNR has no aviation (yet). To deal with the Russian military-hardware, we need more serious equipment.
      But for the air defense of the militia "Wasp" -the very thing. Yes, and got the complexes for free (if, of course, this term is appropriate here). Consumables are trophy or "Voentorg". Calculations can be assembled from pensioners. The complex is not new. Now, if the "Wasp" had still the opportunity to aim at a ground target, then in general there would be beauty. If there are now anti-aircraft weapons here, please comment on this possibility.
  9. 0
    7 September 2015 10: 05
    I agree with my comrade, if the eroplans stayed, they will soon be transferred !!! soldier
  10. 0
    7 September 2015 10: 47
    the wonderful technique was COMMITTED with ukrov, however ... :)
  11. 0
    7 September 2015 11: 40
    Today we practiced one of the elements of combat training - the action of the battalion in the offensive, also the elements of repelling an air enemy’s raid, passing vehicles through minefields, contaminated area

    Well, where are they going to attack? belay
    A blow to Kiev from the north through the Zone?
  12. 0
    7 September 2015 12: 27
    Quote: Polite Elk
    Now, if the "Wasp" still had the opportunity to aim at a ground target, then in general there would be beauty. If there are anti-aircraft weapons here now, please comment on this possibility

    Unfortunately can not sad Unless, theoretically, in a pure steppe, and the target should not move weakly. The radar will not catch ... the Doppler effect, however. Although the hovering helicopter "sees".
    Well, in general, "OSA" is a masterpiece of tube circuitry! With a nuclear explosion, it will work, well, except that the all-round view indicator will fly, well, so there is a Television optical sight.
    1. +1
      7 September 2015 16: 57
      Quote: Barracuda
      Unfortunately it cannot: Unless theoretically in a pure steppe, and the goal should not move weakly.


      Thanks for your comment. But I am haunted by the fact that the "Osa" complex, though sea-based, was successfully used on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX by the crew of the Mirage MRK against such a relatively slow target as a Georgian boat. So I think it would be a good tool, in the absence of air targets, the militia would blow off optics and other attachments from Ukrainian tanks.
      1. 0
        7 September 2015 18: 57
        Quote: Polite Elk
        Thanks for your comment. But I am now haunted by the fact that the "Osa" complex, though sea-based, was successfully used on 08.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX by the crew of the Mirage MRK against such a relatively slow target as a Georgian boat

        This is a sea wasp. There, with radar observation, the target is easier - at sea with natural shelters и uneven terrain somehow very bad. smile

        On land, most often the situation is this: if an air defense system has a radar-observable ground target, then it can already fire at it.
    2. 0
      7 September 2015 19: 02
      Quote: Barracuda
      Unfortunately it cannot sad Unless, theoretically, in a pure steppe, and the target should not move weakly. The radar will not catch .. the Doppler effect, however. Although the hovering helicopter "sees".

      Is radar capture required? Does the "wasp" seem to have a missile defense system with a rocket-assisted vehicle?
      On the S-125, with the same principle of aiming the missile defense system, it was possible to shoot at the "ground" even if the target was not observed: estimated the azimuth-range on the map, set the "cross" manually according to these data - and the missile defense system flies to where it stands. And whether the radar station sees someone there or not - it is parallel to it. SAM is not guided by the target, but by the "cross" - "azimuth, elevation, range" (this is already the task of the calculation so that the "cross" is where the target is) smile
      1. +1
        8 September 2015 08: 24
        Quote: Alexey RA
        On our S-125, with the same principle of aiming missiles, it was possible to shoot on the "ground" even if the target was not observed


        Thanks for the comment. Very informative. This possibility of the S-125 was not advertised. (in any case, the information passed me by).
        1. 0
          8 September 2015 10: 08
          Quote: Polite Elk
          Thanks for the comment. Very informative. This possibility of the S-125 was not advertised. (in any case, the information passed me by).

          So this is a standard feature of the RKTU. It also works for the air: if the target disappeared (put a hindrance, went beyond the folds of the terrain) - switch to manual tracking and control the cross with the steering wheels in about the same way as the target went (for this, the air defense system even had a special mode in which the speed of the cross "was set by the steering wheel rotation angle, not by its rotation speed). SAM at RKTU is controlled by radio commands from the ground, it is not necessary for it to have a radar-observed target (more precisely, it is not necessary until the final stage, when the radio fuse is turned on - for it, something reflective is still needed).

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"