Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved

122
Japan does not consider the issue of ownership of the Kuril Islands resolved, reports TASS statement of the Secretary General of the Japanese Cabinet Yoshihide Sugi.

Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved


“This issue is not resolved. First of all, there is no peace treaty between Russia and Japan, Suga said at a press conference. “Japan cannot accept the fact that the four northern islands became the territory of Russia in the wake of the Second World War”.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov commented on the reluctance of the Japanese side to recognize the results of World War II as follows: “We always ask the Japanese:“ Gentlemen, do you recognize the results of the Second World War? ” They answer: "In general, yes, but in this question - no." “But how did you then ratify the UN Charter?” We ask. “There is an article 107, which says: everything that the victorious powers did is holy and indestructible.”

“Let it be in other words, but the legal meaning is as follows - do not touch anything,” the minister explained. “We are returning them to the UN Charter, and here they cannot argue anything, and we can say that Japan is the only country that questions the outcome of the Second World War, no one else does.”

The agency recalls that after the end of World War II, all the Kuril Islands were incorporated into the Soviet Union. However, the Japanese still dispute the ownership of the islands of Shikotan, Kunashir, Iturup and the Hamami group of islands.
  • ITAR-TASS / Vladimir Sergeev
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

122 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tor5
    +33
    5 September 2015 09: 54
    Solved! Finally and irrevocably!
    1. +46
      5 September 2015 10: 01
      Dear, quick-eyed kids! Say thanks, what about. Hokaido is yours! Because according to the results of the Potsdam conference, this island also departed from the USSR and only the vile behavior of cunning pins ... in, yes, the kindness of Uncle Joe kept this island behind Japan!
      1. +21
        5 September 2015 10: 01
        Samurai crying in the northern territories:
        "Oh, mom, Shikotan, Shikotan!" ..
        1. +12
          5 September 2015 12: 21
          the issue with the Kuril Islands has long been resolved, and is not subject to discussion.
          1. +5
            5 September 2015 12: 32
            did they drag him to the chermet?
          2. +3
            5 September 2015 18: 24
            .. rolled under the table)))) super army))))
          3. +3
            5 September 2015 19: 43
            The question with the Kuril Islands is not a question! The issue with the Kuril Islands is a provocation!
          4. +4
            5 September 2015 21: 56
            we would have solved such a problem in 1 hour without a Bram crew)))))
        2. +8
          5 September 2015 14: 35
          Quote: herruvim
          Samurai crying in the northern territories:
          "Oh, mom, Shikotan, Shikotan!" ..

          :)) And in order to completely break Japanese farts, I propose to rename the islands: Putin, Shoigu, Medvedev, Lavrov! :)
      2. +11
        5 September 2015 10: 58
        For understanding, a little help:
        1. +10
          5 September 2015 11: 41
          Samaritan
          For understanding, a little help:

          Thanks for the help! Everything is correct. The only thing is that there are a number of geographic additions.
          As far as my memory serves me, the last geographical "discoveries" and amendments to the map were made and recorded on September 2.9.1945, XNUMX ... and written in the blood of Soviet soldiers.
          In this regard ... this topic ... about changes on the geographic map in this region ... DO NOT BE DISCUSSED!
          1. +3
            5 September 2015 11: 59
            Quote: KazaK Bo
            ...
            As far as my memory serves me, ...
            - Cool - to the piggy bank! smile
        2. +1
          5 September 2015 16: 44
          All is correct !!! Lavrov is right, if questions arise, then refer to Article 107 of the UN Charter. And the fact that the peace treaty has not been concluded is all questions for Stalin. Here you will be there and ask them, maybe he will answer you
        3. -1
          6 September 2015 13: 42
          This "help" has already surfaced 100 times here.
      3. +6
        5 September 2015 11: 18
        Quote: Finches
        Dear, quick-eyed kids! Say thanks, what about. Hokaido is yours!

        We all look at this problem from Japan, on the principle of a glass in which half the water is poured, someone looks and says, half empty, half full.
        We must ask, maybe the Japanese want to give us something from the islands, or want to join the Russian Federation, apparently tired of being under the yoke of the United States. Want to get out of slavery? laughing
        1. +2
          5 September 2015 15: 44
          it’s time for us to answer this question ... and roll the asphalt from above ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -11
      5 September 2015 10: 02
      Quote: Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!


      No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.
      But so far, the Japanese are completely in vain hoping to profit. They don't offer anything interesting in return. Only one thing: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you tell me - I tell you, and nothing else. And for the islands, it should be just something very tasty.
      1. +13
        5 September 2015 10: 13
        No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.


        There is no word "NO" in Russian wink
        There is a word NO.
        1. -1
          5 September 2015 10: 27
          Quote: Temples
          There is no word "NO" in Russian
          There is a word NO.


          There is such a word in Russian. And many others, now practically unused. "Okoyom", eg.
        2. +1
          5 September 2015 11: 23
          There is no word "NO" in Russian wink
          There is a word NO. [/ Quote]

          We are people syringes, we have syntax and punctuation to the damn thing. wink
          1. +3
            5 September 2015 11: 59
            Quote: Genych
            We are the people of the house-lapnochny, us the syntax and punctuation to the damn.

            We are not weak and flush out. tongue
        3. +5
          5 September 2015 11: 46
          No - one of rarely used case forms of the word "no".
          You, a connoisseur of the language, do you know in Russian such cases as local (locative), vocative (vocative), instrumental (instrumental)? And they are wink
          For example, "about snow, about a forest" is a prepositional, and "in the snow, in a forest" is a local ...
        4. +2
          5 September 2015 11: 49
          As it is not there is no word, I use it, here you are: no.
        5. +4
          5 September 2015 12: 04
          Quote: Temples
          There is no word "NO" in Russian wink

          What are you, citizen, encroaching on the size and power of the Russian language?
          As you know, the Germans went into reconnaissance, they wanted to take the language and could not. Great and powerful Russian language. Yes
        6. +4
          5 September 2015 12: 10
          Quote: Temples
          There is no word "NO" in Russian
          There is a word NO.

          Specially asked a friend philologist: the word no Yes в colloquial in Russian.

          There is no such word in the literary.

          Better to say "netuti" ... laughing
        7. 0
          5 September 2015 16: 26
          KU KU can be recognized as a synonym for the words NE and NO
      2. +5
        5 September 2015 10: 48
        IN, Events
        Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved


        But this, from Japanese, translates as: TERRITORIAL CLAIMS...
      3. +5
        5 September 2015 11: 00
        plus to you. but they already seemed to be talking. we give them islands, and they will think about lifting "some" sanctions. and will host our president. in my opinion this is something bitter and not tasty at all.
        1. 0
          5 September 2015 16: 29
          You remain from the tree of information. The Japanese are already offering to trade through the yen / ruble, discarding the $. That is, there is no talk of sanctions in this option. That is, the question of sanctions automatically disappears, $ and C ША are on the sidelines. Read between the lines: "Well, give us something from the islands"
      4. +1
        5 September 2015 15: 12
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        Quote: Tor5
        Solved! Finally and irrevocably!


        No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.
        But so far, the Japanese are completely in vain hoping to profit. They don't offer anything interesting in return. Only one thing: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you tell me - I tell you, and nothing else. And for the islands it should be just something very tasty.

        ====
        and what can they have tasty? unless Russia itself is messing up something, there is no other option. it would be better to invest in the development of these islands, the region would develop, the Japanese traveled and lived there
    4. +9
      5 September 2015 10: 02
      "Gentlemen, do you recognize the results of the Second World War?" They answer: "In general, yes, but on this issue - no." “How did you ratify the UN Charter then?” We ask. “There is Article 107, which says: everything that the victorious powers did is sacred and indestructible.”
      "For everyone who wants to revise the results of the Second World War, the Russian army can hold a re-run!" - whose quote I don't remember, sorry. smile
      1. +8
        5 September 2015 10: 05

        “This issue has not been resolved. First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan, said Suga at a press conference.

        Well, isn't he a suga, huh? angry How much can be bullied one and the same.
      2. +7
        5 September 2015 10: 07
        Yes, just bazaar in front of their constituents, PR golem.
        1. +2
          5 September 2015 18: 43
          Igor39 (3) SU Today, 10:07 ↑

          Yes, just bazaar in front of their constituents, PR golem.

          I agree with you. They have all election campaigns under Kuril sauce. All candidates promise to resolve the Northern Territories issue. Under the USSR, something I have not heard that Japan claims to anything. As soon as the democrats ruin the country, all sorts of territorial misunderstandings began. To be honest, during the EBN's reign, I was not 100% sure that the Kuril Islands would not merge. Thank God, nothing happened. Yapi clicked through the window of opportunity. They have a lot of bamboo growing. Let them smoke it instead of the Kuriles.
      3. -14
        5 September 2015 10: 44
        Do you agree to start a global war?
        1. +13
          5 September 2015 10: 49
          Whose cow is mooing, but the "descendants of Moses" are better off keeping quiet.
          1. +3
            5 September 2015 11: 49
            The anecdote is actually from Chaucer's "Canterbury Tales", he is at least 630 years old ... By the way, it was about the British wink
          2. -12
            5 September 2015 13: 14
            Whatever cow mooed, but it is better for anti-Semites to be silent. They have already brought Russia and this is not the limit.

            Ivan arrives in Moscow and the first thing he goes to a brothel.
            I.- Please, Light.
            They answer him: "Sveta is busy."
            I.- I will wait.
            An hour later, Sveta freed herself, somersaulted with Ivan, an hour, Ivan gets 200 rubles and gives it to Sveta.
            S. - Why so much, my God?
            But she took the money.
            The next day, Ivan comes again and the whole story repeats itself.
            On the third day the same thing, after the bed of Light again:
            Why so much, my goodness?
            I.- What are you, what are you, everything is in order, it was your aunt from the Far East who asked me to give you 600 rubles.
            1. +5
              5 September 2015 13: 24
              the point is, in general, not in the country, but in the petty mentality of your people.
            2. +1
              5 September 2015 15: 38
              He went to Israel, well, and sits there at home and do not go to us. Or is there no one to teach life to?
        2. +3
          5 September 2015 11: 51
          Global war? But who to stand up for them? USA? And why do you think they did not intercede for Georgia in 2008?
          1. -3
            5 September 2015 13: 32
            Already today, the Japanese Navy is more powerful than the Far Eastern Navy of Russia.
            But this is not even the main thing.
            1. +3
              5 September 2015 15: 46
              Already today, the Japanese Navy is more powerful than the Far Eastern Navy of Russia.
              And according to the Global Firepower rating, the Israeli army is 11th lower than Turkey, Japan, Germany, South Korea.
              But this is not even the main thing.
            2. +1
              5 September 2015 16: 51
              Look at the map.
        3. +8
          5 September 2015 12: 36
          Do you agree to start a global war ?,
          Russia does not start a war, it ends them.
        4. +5
          5 September 2015 13: 09
          Quote: oreax
          Do you agree to start a global war?

          Is it better not to get involved and give it back? .. And I would like to give someone to Israel, Palestine, for example, - there, too, the question is in full growth. What do you dispose of foreign territories, p.r.i.d.u.r.o.k!
          1. -8
            5 September 2015 13: 29
            p.r.i.d.u.r.o.k! it's you!!!
            You said now I translate into Russian:
            I would like to give Russia the Urals.
            1. +5
              5 September 2015 14: 14
              Quote: oreax
              You said now I translate into Russian:
            2. 0
              5 September 2015 16: 53
              Here it is, cut your desert. There are no your interests here.
          2. +1
            5 September 2015 16: 38
            And in addition to transfer 140 thousand of our God's chosen ones "
        5. +3
          5 September 2015 19: 18
          Quote: oreax
          Do you agree to start a global war?


          Dear oreax. I see that you are specifically zaminusli, so with your permission I will intervene in the discussion.
          Your question about the readiness to start a global war was asked a little incorrectly. Of all those present on this site (from adults), no one wants any war. As for the results of the Great Patriotic War, for me and for the vast majority of Russian citizens (and not only), these results, I am not afraid of this word, are sacred. Both of my grandfathers died in this war. Editing a story will be for me a betrayal of their memory.
          And, if you imagine the situation: Russia is at war (no matter with whom), the forces are unequal, defeat is inevitable, the use of nuclear weapons is necessary, the consequences are unpredictable, the "Start" button is in my hands, then I will not hesitate before pressing it.
      4. +5
        5 September 2015 11: 04
        Quote: BilliBoms09
        Russian army may re-screen! "



        To begin with, within the framework of the month of Russian-Japanese "friendship", to open a Russian cinema of the second film in Tokyo, in which to scroll through some chronicle from the Second World War ...

        Entrance to the sessions, so be it, as part of a cultural exchange, to make free ...
      5. 0
        5 September 2015 16: 55
        Shamans, but I could be wrong
    5. +14
      5 September 2015 10: 57
      The question is closed:
    6. +3
      5 September 2015 11: 17
      Quote: Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!

      Let the Japanese consider how they want, there will be no revision of the issue. A peace treaty can be concluded, but why? Japan lined up under the USA, what is the use of a peace treaty with a non-independent country.
    7. +6
      5 September 2015 11: 28
      Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!

      How much more can you crush the water in the mortar.
      It is necessary for the State Duma and the Government to make a decision - to PUBLISH IN ALL OUR MEDIA, ON THE FIRST PAGE:
      - photo of the signing of the surrender of Japan
      - Text of surrender
      - Extract from the UN Charter
      - And only 3 phrases: WHAT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND FOR YOU yet, Mr. JAPANESE ??? IF THAT IS NOT EXPRESSLY - BEFORE YOUR INFORMATION - THIS IS THE LAST GOVERNMENT'S APPEAL TO THIS TOPIC, THE ISLAND AND THE KURIL IS CLOSED ONCE AND FOREVER IN 1945 !!! I wish you happiness, joy, peace and success in your personal life !!!!
      And indeed, completely close any discussion of this issue. And then too carried away by diplomacy! The Japanese feel this and become more and more impudent ... pull us into an unnecessary discussion ... Are there really no other worries ???
    8. +4
      5 September 2015 12: 00
      There is always such an answer to the Japanese on their question laughing
    9. +3
      5 September 2015 12: 21
      Not only is the decision irrevocable, but also not subject to appeal. soldier
    10. +2
      5 September 2015 14: 59
      After Fukushima, they would be silent in a Japanese rag ... laughing

      .. "... .. imagine what would happen if the Russians built Fukushima. After the disaster, all the media in Japan, the USA, the EU and the liberal Russian media would immediately spread this news, shouting about inept construction, about the danger to the whole world, etc. But Fukushima was built by the Americans. Therefore, this was mentioned only casually in Japan, and in Europe, and in Russia, and in the USA. No one began to fan the theme that the Americans did not take into account the risk of fairly frequent floods and the volcanic activity of the region. not taken into account, so not taken into account. No one claims. Even the Japanese. However, what to take from people who consider the USSR, having captured its Sakhalin and a couple of islands, as terrible barbarians, and the Americans, who destroyed almost 200 people with two bombs, benefactors and friends. »» »
  2. +8
    5 September 2015 09: 55
    All these islands are ours rightfully, the USSR (Russia) resolutely put a bullet in the 02.09 1945g.
    1. +1
      5 September 2015 10: 19
      Something like this ...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NbCY-xVPyU
      1. +4
        5 September 2015 11: 01
        This year, through the UN, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is finally recognized as the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation. And this question of Japan is like a bone in the throat, the sea is the richest, and now no one can enter it without our permission. So they are furious.
  3. +15
    5 September 2015 09: 55
    Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.
    1. +3
      5 September 2015 10: 01
      Quote: vovanpain
      Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.


      Let the production of Toyota, Sonya and everything else that they have left the way, transferred there, if they themselves do not have enough space, jobs and taxes will not hurt us !!! Yes
      1. +1
        5 September 2015 10: 18
        Let the production of Toyota, Sonya and everything else that they have left the way, they transfer there, if they themselves do not have enough space, jobs and taxes will not hurt us !!


        Offer to work for the Japs?
        What is the joy?
        Will the Japs give money?

        You need to think with your own head. And you need to work for yourself.
        1. 0
          5 September 2015 10: 51
          Quote: Temples
          And you need to work for yourself.

          China works for the whole world, but first of all it doesn’t soar for itself, just like South Korea, Malaysia, etc.

          Quote: Temples
          Will the Japs give money?


          Not only, first of all, technologies and specialists (our specialists, who will learn and work on these technologies, and not resell to each other any consumer goods of unknown origin and quality in city markets, sitting on unemployment benefits and fake disabilities)
          And the emergence of an "absolutely new", albeit very similar enterprise in the neighborhood is a question of the near future. China is a vivid example of this. Yes

          Quote: Temples
          You need to think with your own head.

          I agree, it is necessary, but not like in Skolkovo request Loud statements are made, billions are lost, years go by ..... crying
    2. +15
      5 September 2015 10: 14
      Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.

      As Zhirik said, we can only give Hakamada to samurai
  4. +14
    5 September 2015 09: 56
    And what do the Japanese promise in exchange? Peace treaty? What for? 70 years we live and not heavy lol

    Thank God that the fight-drunk did not have time to pass the yupps of the island in due time. And now these islands of our neighbors, like that elbow, are close, but you can’t bite Yes
    1. +3
      5 September 2015 09: 57
      Quote: ROSS_Ulair
      And now these islands of our neighbors, like that elbow, are close, but you can’t bite

      This is not a elbow, but a fist at the solar plexus.
    2. 0
      5 September 2015 16: 42
      JAPA for the Kurids, in addition to the peace treaty, promise to lift the sanctions!
      1. 0
        5 September 2015 20: 06
        Quote: Vladimir Pozlnyakov
        ... promise to lift the sanctions!


        Your hedgehog is twenty! Right! Urgently need to sign a petition to GDP - give urgently!
        wassat laughing
  5. -1
    5 September 2015 09: 57
    I would suggest that the Japanese join the Federation as an autonomous republic.
    Then the Kuril Islands could be included in it.
    1. +6
      5 September 2015 10: 02
      Quote: Haettenschweiler
      Then the Kuril Islands could be included in it.

      Once included in the republic of the peninsula ... No.
  6. +2
    5 September 2015 09: 57
    Zhirik on this occasion correctly put it)))
  7. +1
    5 September 2015 09: 57
    At one time, it was necessary to take Honshu and Shikoku. Now there would be no problems with the rest of the islands.
  8. +4
    5 September 2015 09: 59
    First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan

    Awesome awareness!
    1. +2
      5 September 2015 10: 38
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan

      Awesome awareness!
      those. Japan and the Russian Federation, as the legal successor of the USSR, are at war, because the last decision was to declare war on Japan and demand unconditional surrender? Leningraders, do you have a factory of Toyta lying around there? will we trophy? it’s logical - the property of a country at war with us is subject to nationalization.
  9. +11
    5 September 2015 09: 59
    Billions of years will pass. The entire population of the Earth has long since moved to other planets, will equip them, and heal in a new way. The last ship leaving the planet will leave a note: "The issue with the Kuriles has not been resolved yet" ...
    1. 0
      5 September 2015 10: 19
      While on Earth there is at least one Japanese:
      "The issue with the Kuriles has not been resolved yet" ...
      laughing
      1. +1
        5 September 2015 12: 04
        Quote: Rader
        While on Earth there is at least one Japanese:
        ... The topic of boobs is not disclosed? smile

        PySy: Why is the Japanese capitalized? belay
  10. +4
    5 September 2015 10: 00
    Question resolved - Our Kuril Islands! And we won’t give them to anyone! Moreover, we did not conquer them - we returned them !!! And there, "yap" as much as you want to please the mattress mats!
  11. +4
    5 September 2015 10: 00
    "The issue with the islands has not been resolved." Yah ? Well the day starts! That SPACE agency of Ukraine amused, now here are the Nippons. What is Petrosyan and Stepanenko, so, a pale shadow.
  12. +8
    5 September 2015 10: 01
    them and not the Kuril Islands. Former Samurai not protesting anything against US occupation request
    1. +4
      5 September 2015 10: 30
      Quote: 0255
      Former Samurai not protesting anything against US occupation

      So the Japanas speak with the voice of America! They themselves have no rights to their big island. Conquerors damn it. Destroyed the indigenous population, like the same Anglo-Saxons in North America. And the samurai looks more like an insult (slap in the face).
  13. +16
    5 September 2015 10: 02
    The question was finally and irrevocably resolved in 1945. Calm down the samurai, otherwise you will have to do hara-kiri.
  14. +5
    5 September 2015 10: 03
    Tired of this topic, few who consider what to be their own, Ukrainians such as Crimea, Argentina Foklenda, and nipons generally have the Sun on the flag, so what? Fly and own if not hot.
  15. +6
    5 September 2015 10: 03
    after the end of World War II, all the Kuril Islands were included in the Soviet Union

    What other questions can there be? Japan had to choose the right ally. And the fact that the United States is now more and more actively pushing Japan to "resolve the issue of the northern territories" is of little concern to us. Maybe it is better for Japan to attend first of all to its primordial territories, on which American bases are located?
    1. +3
      5 September 2015 10: 19
      To date, Japan has occupied the SGA and all its statements should be considered Amer. The first began to review this issue Khrushchev or foolishly, or who in the ear puffed promised the islands two islands and away we go. The only option is to send Japan in a certain direction and survive SGA from the region.
  16. +4
    5 September 2015 10: 04
    Let them say thanks that Hokkaido did not begin to occupy. The Japanese really do not like the fact that our islands are a stone throw from them, and the Sea of ​​Okhotsk in this situation is our internal, we do not allow poaching. So this topic is eternal. Should Russia weaken, all the neighbors will immediately remember that we owe them something.
  17. +2
    5 September 2015 10: 08
    Several years ago, the Yapas insistently demanded the Kuril Islands, I thought "now we will fight", but then suddenly a power unit at the nuclear power plant crashed at them, and they calmed down. Now they began to stir again. So I think it's only a nuclear bombardment that calms them down? (Well, Hiroshima, Fukushima?) until they shoot at them, they don't understand a normal conversation? Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right, and we roll a barrel on them?
    1. +1
      5 September 2015 11: 06
      Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right? And we roll a barrel on them?

      Well, it's you in vain. And the Americans roll the barrel, not us. We are still forced to answer.
  18. +6
    5 September 2015 10: 11
    These are strange Japanese, for Russia and almost all other countries the question of the belonging of the Kurils has been resolved a long time ago, but for Japan it has not been resolved ... well, they were smart enough to unleash not a weak war, but after losing it and losing coy what territories they cannot grasp ... It seems to me that they need these Kurils as a "Claim" to Russia, because judge for yourself in all negotiations this issue is present, this is such a strange eastern philosophy - all negotiations should start with claims ... look What kind of "bonuses" and you can "cut" ...
  19. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 13
    The Russian Federation voiced the official point of view that the issue with the Kuril Islands has been resolved a long time and the final results of WWII are recognized by all countries, including Japan, which is confirmed by their signature upon joining the UN, and are not subject to revision.
    In response, Japan handed in a note of protest, where "expressed regret"
    To which the Russian Foreign Ministry "expressed bewilderment" about the "expressed regret"
    The dialogue continues ...
  20. +5
    5 September 2015 10: 13
    Quote: dr.star75
    Several years ago, the Yapas insistently demanded the Kuril Islands, I thought "now we will fight", but then suddenly a power unit at the nuclear power plant crashed at them, and they calmed down. Now they began to stir again. So I think it's only a nuclear bombardment that calms them down? (Well, Hiroshima, Fukushima?) until they shoot at them, they don't understand a normal conversation? Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right, and we roll a barrel on them?


    You seem right, colleague. Then I read the other day how they opened their mouths after the Russo-Japanese War ... In turnips, only in turnips - a direct path to the Nippon brain.
  21. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 15
    The issue of the islands cannot be resolved until we begin to ignore the raising of this issue by Japan.
    Earlier Sergey Lavrov commented
    Let it be in other words, but the legal meaning is this - do not touch anything, ”the minister explained. “We are returning them to the UN Charter, and here they cannot argue anything, and we can say that Japan is the only country that questions the outcome of World War II, no one else does it.”

    Here I would strongly disagree with Lavrov.
  22. +9
    5 September 2015 10: 15
    Mother does not understand Japan! We can explain again!
  23. +6
    5 September 2015 10: 18
    Well, this song is familiar to us. only labeled Misha and drunk Yeltsin sang along. it’s better for the Japanese to continue building islands from garbage.
  24. -7
    5 September 2015 10: 25
    Our islands, I do not argue. And our government is aware that a decent life should be organized on our islands? And not only on the islands, but in all regions! You ask local residents if they like the attitude of our authorities towards them, whether they are paid decent pensions, whether they build roads, develop infrastructure ... or OUR, OUR ....
    1. +2
      5 September 2015 15: 23
      Quote: dirik
      Our islands, I do not argue. And our government is aware that a decent life should be organized on our islands? And not only on the islands, but in all regions! You ask local residents if they like the attitude of our authorities towards them, whether they are paid decent pensions, whether they build roads, develop infrastructure ... or OUR, OUR ....

      ====
      life is getting better there, while they are investing in transport and production, the military will also make its contribution
  25. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 29
    Quote: Tor5
    Solved! Finally and irrevocably!
  26. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 32
    The issue of the so-called "Northern Territories" for Japan is primarily a matter of domestic policy, one of the most important elements of the consolidation of Japanese society. And it does not affect the issues of Russia's economic interests.
    And Japan will never be a political ally of our country, being a "reliable ally of the United States." Having large mutual territorial claims against China, which have become aggravated at the moment, I do not think that this Japanese "mantra" about the islands can cause any difficulties for Russia.
    Opinion is certainly subjective.
  27. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 32
    Japanese, look at the realities of today
    eyes wide open and don’t listen to the USA,
    they have already proven their love for you in
    Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  28. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 33
    No options! Either you sign the peace treaty "as is," or our hands are free.
  29. +2
    5 September 2015 10: 35
    Especially for the Japanese, a new version of the old proverb - before you die you will not smoke !!!!!!!
  30. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 36
    Or maybe send polite people to Hokkaido? And organize a referendum. Do you want to reunite with the Kuril Islands. There are two answers. Yes, not against and No, not against
  31. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 41
    a powerful Russian naval military base must be built on these islands - all the more so since the location of the islands is more than strategic

    airport - required

    and even - if the climate allowed - to let tourist investors (including Japanese ones) - even without taxes for 30 years - build a Russian tourist cluster and establish a free economic zone with a free trade and fishing port - let Japanese fishermen bypass their taxes
    1. 0
      5 September 2015 18: 47
      “In the Kuril Islands, we need a modern combat-ready military force. And at the moment, on the basis of the decisions of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, all the conditions for this have been created, ”the Russian prime minister noted during a recent visit to the Kuril Islands.
  32. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 41
    The verdict is final and not subject to appeal! Our Kuril Islands and let the narrow-eyed lips roll up their lips and swallow their drooling!
  33. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 43
    Ours were ready to sign a peace treaty with the transfer of 2 islands, but the japanes demanded 4th. And in the current situation, they can forget about 2a islands ...
    1. +1
      5 September 2015 10: 55
      Quote: Snob
      Ours were ready to sign a peace treaty with the transfer of 2 islands, but the japanes demanded 4th. And in the current situation, they can forget about 2a islands ..



      The proverb "greed ruined the frayer" - in real life embodiment ...

      But you could take advantage, take two islands, and then again continue the same nagging about the other two ...

      Now they certainly won't ...
  34. 0
    5 September 2015 10: 44
    This is for the Japanese, he remained open. But for us there is no question. We are settling in.
  35. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 50
    Lavrov well done, he knows how to poke his face where it is necessary, it is a pity that some, having pulled out their faces and licked their lips, do not calm down, but wait for a new poke *)

    By the way, Vitaly Churkin is also very good at doing this *)
  36. +4
    5 September 2015 10: 54
    As an option bully
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. +1
    5 September 2015 10: 55
    They were and will remain ours forever and let them not pretend to them!
  39. +2
    5 September 2015 10: 58
    ... bald all over his face, not the Kuril Islands. In vain, Stalin canceled the landing in Hokkaido. Now there would be no questions on the Kuril Islands.
  40. +3
    5 September 2015 10: 59
    I would not think of the Kuril issue in place of the Japanese, but would begin to dump new islands. If you look in 10 years, Japanese territories would appear where you can calmly settle in. Japan still has a lot of problems with China, so we should not think about acquiring new lands, but about how to keep our own. It is clear that they broadcast mattress ideas, but only wherever you poke your nose, death and chaos are devastating. I think ordinary Japanese people do not want them to be cannon fodder for Americans. If you want to try to pick them up, you are welcome .... there will be enough land for everyone in the amount of 2x2x1,5 m. For 70 years we have lived without a peace treaty with Japan, and it seems like nothing bad happened. Japanese cars, electronics, rolls, I love all this very much)))) therefore gentlemen samurai live in friendship with Russia !!!
  41. +3
    5 September 2015 11: 01
    Yapi behave like dill: they declare Russia an enemy and demand a discount on gas, and in Tokyo, Taldychat - the war is not over with Russia, throw at least a couple of islands to the samurai.
    Or maybe in addition to you the key to the apartment where the money is?
  42. +2
    5 September 2015 11: 11
    Japanese robots!
    As an experienced and experienced person, I recommend that you forget about the "Kuril issue". Forever and ever.
    So as not to spoil your nerves and to expose your government as idiots in front of your own people.
    The investigation is over Forget !!!
  43. +3
    5 September 2015 11: 22
    Sweet Hokkaido
    I'm you Honshu.
    For your shikoku
    I am Kyushu. All is not enough for them, how many islands have
  44. +1
    5 September 2015 11: 23
    Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved

    resolved since you lost the war in the 40s.
  45. +2
    5 September 2015 11: 32
    They lost the Kuril Islands as a result of the war, they can be returned only by victory in a new war or an equivalent exchange for Alaska. How they wring it out from Amerika does not bother us anymore.)))
  46. 0
    5 September 2015 11: 33
    On Thursday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov said that the Kuril issue was "resolved 70 years ago" and "there is no dialogue with Tokyo on the Kuril problem."

    Moscow’s position is that the southern Kuril Islands became part of the USSR as a result of World War II, and Russian sovereignty over them, having the appropriate international legal design, is not in doubt
    .
    Then the Japanese once again became sweet .... wassat
    The head of the European Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Hajime Hayashi, on Friday conveyed a protest to the Russian ambassador to Tokyo, Evgeny Afanasyev, and stated that "the statement is unacceptable."

    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20150904/1228568304.html#ixzz3kqZUO06O
    .

    And it’s acceptable to express dissatisfaction and protests about the trips of Russian officials throughout Russia (Medvedev’s trip to the Kuril Islands

    Only 14% of the former residents of the southern Kuril Islands and their descendants interviewed by NHK broadcaster believe that the islands of Iturup, Shikotan, Kunashir and Habomai will be returned to Japan.
    Most of the Japanese who lived until 1945 on the islands of Iturup, Shikotan, Kunashir and Habomai do not believe that these islands will return to Japan, such conclusions follow from a questionnaire conducted by NHK.
    The survey involved former residents, as well as their children and grandchildren born after the islands were occupied by troops of the Soviet Army in August 1945. Only 14% of respondents said they believed that the islands would be returned to Japan, while 49% thought that this would not happen.


    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20150904/1228972936.html#ixzz3kqazlt63
  47. +2
    5 September 2015 11: 37
    Quote: Haettenschweiler
    They don't offer anything interesting in return. Only one thing: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you tell me - I tell you, and nothing else.

    Trading your land is criminal! It is necessary to honor the memory of Soviet soldiers who fell in battles for these islands. For them, it was the EARTH, for which they paid with their lives.
  48. +1
    5 September 2015 12: 12
    "Japan cannot accept the fact that the four northern islands following the results of World War II became the territory of Russia."
    So these are your personal national difficulties, gentlemen, the Japanese, live with them and suffer or turn over this page and live with what you have, reconciled. In general, I fully support the answer of our Foreign Minister, you can’t say better.
  49. +2
    5 September 2015 12: 13
    "Japan is the only country that questions the results of World War II, no one else does it" ... they say what the rulers of the occupying American troops wrote to them ... word for word, current and no other way.
    1. 0
      5 September 2015 15: 40
      mistake Ukraine is also not .....))))
  50. +1
    5 September 2015 13: 07
    And I believe that the issue with the island of Okinawa, annexed by japs ​​in 1879, has not been resolved. And I can not accept the fact of the occupation of the Ryukyu Islands!
  51. 0
    5 September 2015 13: 26
    Yes, the Japanese simply have this style of behavior and thinking.
    They just don't understand our "no".
    We convey it in the wrong way, in the wrong words.
    And even beating is useless; they won’t understand why we’re beating.
  52. +1
    5 September 2015 15: 14
    You have to pay for everything, and the fact that the Japs dance to someone else’s tune is not an excuse. They wouldn’t have attacked Russia, and they’d be sitting on the Kuril Islands right now.
  53. 0
    5 September 2015 15: 15
    For the Japanese, everything was decided long ago and finally...
  54. 0
    5 September 2015 15: 16
    however, as for Ukrainians...
  55. 0
    5 September 2015 15: 39
    Japanese authorities in World War II were fools for getting involved in the war! and the current authorities, disgracing their nation by the fact that there was an agreement, they signed and now... they are not samurai but slugs who do not know how to be responsible for their words and actions, disgrace all adequate Japanese by filling their heads with the idea that it has not been decided and thereby escalating the situation that may sooner or later result in a conflict!
  56. 0
    5 September 2015 16: 10
    Quote: herruvim
    Samurai crying in the northern territories:
    "Oh, mom, Shikotan, Shikotan!" ..

    I would put it differently: “to hell with you, Shikotan, Shikotan...”, and the rest of the islands
  57. 0
    5 September 2015 16: 18
    Quote: oreax
    Already today, the Japanese Navy is more powerful than the Far Eastern Navy of Russia.
    But this is not even the main thing.

    That's right, that's not the main thing. You and your half-brothers (Arabs) would find a common language and mutual understanding and not teach others this
  58. 0
    5 September 2015 17: 04
    Fuck you, Japan, not the Kuril Islands!!! Definitely!!!
  59. 0
    5 September 2015 17: 35
    Quote: narval20
    As an option bully


    WHERE IS CRIMEA?????
  60. 0
    5 September 2015 17: 54
    Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved
    Moscow: the issue with the Kuril Islands has been finally resolved.
    More questions?
  61. 0
    5 September 2015 19: 19
    What kind of fornication is this? Does the occupied country make any claims to its neighbors? It follows that these claims are from the occupiers? Is it worth maintaining any kind of relationship with claimants at all?
  62. 0
    5 September 2015 19: 48
    The Japanese are as annoying as flies! How much can you talk about the same thing? fool
  63. 0
    5 September 2015 21: 00
    It was decided a long time ago. Forget it.
  64. 0
    5 September 2015 21: 18
    As the Emperor wisely said, a friend of the peoples of the Galaxy, “We don’t need someone else’s at all, since everything is ours around us!”
  65. 0
    5 September 2015 21: 23
    It seems that the Japanese question has not been completely resolved. The samurai raised their heads again. Gorbachev's "new thinking in the nuclear age" lives and wins!
  66. 0
    5 September 2015 21: 45
    What islands? And hoo-hoo not ho-ho!
  67. +1
    6 September 2015 05: 50
    Let the Japanese be glad that they left Hokkaido and changed their minds about landing our troops.
  68. 0
    6 September 2015 14: 00
    These Japanese got everything mixed up. The issue with the Kuril Islands has already been resolved without their participation, but the issue with the island of Hokkaido may be on the agenda, and we will resolve it. Whoever of the Japanese does not hide is not our fault.
  69. 0
    6 September 2015 15: 38
    ""This issue has not been resolved. First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan"

    Well why? In Russia THIS issue has been resolved a long time ago, since September 45. And the rest is Japan's problems.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"