Military Review

Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved

122
Japan does not consider the issue of ownership of the Kuril Islands resolved, reports TASS statement of the Secretary General of the Japanese Cabinet Yoshihide Sugi.


Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved


“This issue is not resolved. First of all, there is no peace treaty between Russia and Japan, Suga said at a press conference. “Japan cannot accept the fact that the four northern islands became the territory of Russia in the wake of the Second World War”.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov commented on the reluctance of the Japanese side to recognize the results of World War II as follows: “We always ask the Japanese:“ Gentlemen, do you recognize the results of the Second World War? ” They answer: "In general, yes, but in this question - no." “But how did you then ratify the UN Charter?” We ask. “There is an article 107, which says: everything that the victorious powers did is holy and indestructible.”

“Let it be in other words, but the legal meaning is as follows - do not touch anything,” the minister explained. “We are returning them to the UN Charter, and here they cannot argue anything, and we can say that Japan is the only country that questions the outcome of the Second World War, no one else does.”

The agency recalls that after the end of World War II, all the Kuril Islands were incorporated into the Soviet Union. However, the Japanese still dispute the ownership of the islands of Shikotan, Kunashir, Iturup and the Hamami group of islands.
Photos used:
ITAR-TASS / Vladimir Sergeev
122 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tor5
    Tor5 5 September 2015 09: 54 New
    +33
    Solved! Finally and irrevocably!
    1. Finches
      Finches 5 September 2015 10: 01 New
      +46
      Dear, quick-eyed kids! Say thanks, what about. Hokaido is yours! Because according to the results of the Potsdam conference, this island also departed from the USSR and only the vile behavior of cunning pins ... in, yes, the kindness of Uncle Joe kept this island behind Japan!
      1. herruvim
        herruvim 5 September 2015 10: 01 New
        +21
        Samurai crying in the northern territories:
        "Oh, mother, Shikotan, Shikotan!" ..
        1. Alexander Petrovich
          Alexander Petrovich 5 September 2015 12: 21 New
          +12
          the issue with the Kuril Islands has long been resolved, and is not subject to discussion.
          1. kotvov
            kotvov 5 September 2015 12: 32 New
            +5
            did they drag him to the chermet?
          2. Tiamat2702
            Tiamat2702 5 September 2015 18: 24 New
            +3
            .. rolled under the table)))) super army))))
          3. BMP-2
            BMP-2 5 September 2015 19: 43 New
            +3
            The question with the Kuril Islands is not a question! The issue with the Kuril Islands is a provocation!
          4. major7775
            major7775 5 September 2015 21: 56 New
            +4
            we would have solved such a problem in 1 hour without a Bram crew)))))
        2. Samaritan
          Samaritan 5 September 2015 14: 35 New
          +8
          Quote: herruvim
          Samurai crying in the northern territories:
          "Oh, mother, Shikotan, Shikotan!" ..

          :)) And in order to completely break Japanese farts, I propose to rename the islands: Putin, Shoigu, Medvedev, Lavrov! :)
      2. Samaritan
        Samaritan 5 September 2015 10: 58 New
        +11
        For understanding, a little help:
        1. KazaK Bo
          KazaK Bo 5 September 2015 11: 41 New
          +10
          Samaritan
          For understanding, a little help:

          Thanks for the help! Everything is correct. The only thing is that there are a number of geographic additions.
          As far as my memory serves me, the latest geographical "discoveries" and corrections to the map were introduced and recorded on September 2.9.1945, XNUMX ... and registered with the blood of Soviet soldiers.
          In this regard ... this topic ... about changes on the geographic map in this region ... DO NOT BE DISCUSSED!
          1. iConst
            iConst 5 September 2015 11: 59 New
            +3
            Quote: KazaK Bo
            .
            As far as my memory serves me, ...
            - Cool - to the piggy bank! smile
        2. Bvg132
          Bvg132 5 September 2015 16: 44 New
          +1
          All is correct !!! Lavrov is right, if questions arise, then refer to Article 107 of the UN Charter. And the fact that the peace treaty has not been concluded is all questions for Stalin. Here you will be there and ask them, maybe he will answer you
        3. Nosgoth
          Nosgoth 6 September 2015 13: 42 New
          -1
          This "help" here has already popped up 100 times.
      3. Sirocco
        Sirocco 5 September 2015 11: 18 New
        +6
        Quote: Finches
        Dear, quick-eyed kids! Say thanks, what about. Hokaido is yours!

        We all look at this problem from Japan, on the principle of a glass in which half the water is poured, someone looks and says, half empty, half full.
        We must ask, maybe the Japanese want to give us something from the islands, or want to join the Russian Federation, apparently tired of being under the yoke of the United States. Want to get out of slavery? laughing
        1. shvn
          shvn 5 September 2015 15: 44 New
          +2
          it’s time for us to answer this question ... and roll the asphalt from above ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Haettenschweiler
      Haettenschweiler 5 September 2015 10: 02 New
      -11
      Quote: Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!


      No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.
      But for now, the Japanese are completely in vain hoping to profit. They do not offer anything interesting in return. One thing only: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you are to me - I am to you, and nothing else. And for the islands, it should be just something very tasty.
      1. Temples
        Temples 5 September 2015 10: 13 New
        +13
        No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.


        There is no in the Russian language the word "NO" wink
        There is a word NO.
        1. Haettenschweiler
          Haettenschweiler 5 September 2015 10: 27 New
          -1
          Quote: Temples
          There is no in the Russian language the word "NO"
          There is a word NO.


          There is such a word in Russian. And many others, now practically unused. "Eye", eg.
        2. Genych
          Genych 5 September 2015 11: 23 New
          +1
          There is no in the Russian language the word "NO" wink
          There is a word NO. [/ Quote]

          We are people syringes, we have syntax and punctuation to the damn thing. wink
          1. VseDoFeNi
            VseDoFeNi 5 September 2015 11: 59 New
            +3
            Quote: Genych
            We are the people of the house-lapnochny, us the syntax and punctuation to the damn.

            We are not weak and flush out. tongue
        3. Weyland
          Weyland 5 September 2015 11: 46 New
          +5
          No - one of rarely used case forms of the word "no."
          You, a connoisseur of the language, do you know in Russian such cases as local (locative), vocative (vocative), instrumental (instrumental)? And they are wink
          For example, "about snow, about the forest" - prepositional, and "in the snow, in the forest" - local ...
        4. cth; fyn
          cth; fyn 5 September 2015 11: 49 New
          +2
          As it is not there is no word, I use it, here you are: no.
        5. VseDoFeNi
          VseDoFeNi 5 September 2015 12: 04 New
          +4
          Quote: Temples
          There is no in Russian the word "NO" wink

          What are you, citizen, encroaching on the size and power of the Russian language?
          As you know, the Germans went into reconnaissance, they wanted to take the language and could not. Great and powerful Russian language. yes
        6. iConst
          iConst 5 September 2015 12: 10 New
          +4
          Quote: Temples
          There is no in the Russian language the word "NO"
          There is a word NO.

          Specially asked a friend philologist: the word no Yes в colloquial in Russian.

          There is no such word in the literary.

          Better to say "netuti" ... laughing
        7. Bvg132
          Bvg132 5 September 2015 16: 26 New
          0
          KU KU can be recognized as a synonym for the words NE and NO
      2. Tanais
        Tanais 5 September 2015 10: 48 New
        +5
        IN, Events
        Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved


        But this, from Japanese, translates as: TERRITORIAL CLAIMS.
      3. sieras
        sieras 5 September 2015 11: 00 New
        +5
        plus you. but they kind of spoke already. we are the islands for them, and they will think about lifting "some" sanctions. and will receive our president. I think this is something bitter and not at all tasty.
        1. Bvg132
          Bvg132 5 September 2015 16: 29 New
          0
          You remain from the shaft of information. The Japanese are now offering to trade through the yen / ruble, dropping $. That is, about the sanctions in this option is not a conversation. That is, the question of sanctions automatically disappears, $ and С ША are on the side. Read between the lines: “Well, give us something from the islands”
      4. Victorio
        Victorio 5 September 2015 15: 12 New
        +1
        Quote: Haettenschweiler
        Quote: Tor5
        Solved! Finally and irrevocably!


        No in politics, nothing permanent and eternal, as practice shows.
        But for now, the Japanese are completely in vain hoping to profit. They do not offer anything interesting in return. One thing only: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you are to me - I am to you, and nothing else. And for the islands it should be just something very tasty.

        ====
        and what can they have tasty? unless Russia itself is messing up something, there is no other option. it would be better to invest in the development of these islands, the region would develop, the Japanese traveled and lived there
    4. BilliBoms09
      BilliBoms09 5 September 2015 10: 02 New
      +9
      "Gentlemen, do you recognize the results of World War II?" They answer: "In general, yes, but in this matter - no." “But how did you ratify the UN Charter then?” We ask. “There is Article 107, which says: everything that the victorious powers did is sacred and indestructible.”
      "To everyone who wants to review the results of World War II, the Russian army can hold a second run!" - whose quote I do not remember, I'm sorry. smile
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 5 September 2015 10: 05 New
        +8

        “This issue has not been resolved. First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan, said Suga at a press conference.

        Well, isn't he a suga, huh? angry How much can be bullied one and the same.
      2. Igor39
        Igor39 5 September 2015 10: 07 New
        +7
        Yes, just bazaar in front of their constituents, PR golem.
        1. Polite Moose
          Polite Moose 5 September 2015 18: 43 New
          +2
          Igor39 (3) SU Today, 10:07 ↑

          Yes, just bazaar in front of their constituents, PR golem.

          I agree with you. They have all the election campaigns under the Kuril sauce. All candidates promise to resolve the Northern Territories issue. Under the USSR, I did not hear something that Japan claims to be something. As soon as the democrats ruined the country, all sorts of territorial misunderstandings began. Honestly, during the reign of EBN, I did not have 100% certainty that the Kuril Islands would not merge. Thank God, nothing happened. Yapi's window of opportunity clicked. They have a lot of bamboo growing. So let him smoke instead of the Kuril Islands.
      3. oreax
        oreax 5 September 2015 10: 44 New
        -14
        Do you agree to start a global war?
        1. Name
          Name 5 September 2015 10: 49 New
          +13
          Whatever cow mumbled, but "the descendants of Moses" is better to be silent.
          1. Weyland
            Weyland 5 September 2015 11: 49 New
            +3
            A joke, actually, from Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, he’s at least 630 years old ... By the way, it was about the British wink
          2. oreax
            oreax 5 September 2015 13: 14 New
            -12
            Whatever cow mooed, but it is better for anti-Semites to be silent. They have already brought Russia and this is not the limit.

            Ivan arrives in Moscow and the first thing he goes to a brothel.
            I.- Please, Light.
            They answer him: "The lights are busy."
            I.- I will wait.
            An hour later, Sveta freed herself, somersaulted with Ivan, an hour, Ivan gets 200 rubles and gives it to Sveta.
            S. - Why so much, my God?
            But she took the money.
            The next day, Ivan comes again and the whole story repeats itself.
            On the third day the same thing, after the bed of Light again:
            Why so much, my goodness?
            I.- What are you, what are you, everything is in order, it was your aunt from the Far East who asked me to give you 600 rubles.
            1. art 230
              art 230 5 September 2015 13: 24 New
              +5
              the point is, in general, not in the country, but in the petty mentality of your people.
            2. BilliBoms09
              BilliBoms09 5 September 2015 15: 38 New
              +1
              He went to Israel, well, and sits there at home and do not go to us. Or is there no one to teach life to?
        2. cth; fyn
          cth; fyn 5 September 2015 11: 51 New
          +3
          Global war? But who to stand up for them? USA? And why do you think they did not intercede for Georgia in 2008?
          1. oreax
            oreax 5 September 2015 13: 32 New
            -3
            Already today, the Japanese Navy is more powerful than the Far Eastern Navy of Russia.
            But this is not even the main thing.
            1. BilliBoms09
              BilliBoms09 5 September 2015 15: 46 New
              +3
              Already today, the Japanese Navy is more powerful than the Far Eastern Navy of Russia.
              And according to the Global Firepower rating, the Israeli army is 11th lower than Turkey, Japan, Germany, South Korea.
              But this is not even the main thing.
            2. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 5 September 2015 16: 51 New
              +1
              Look at the map.
        3. kotvov
          kotvov 5 September 2015 12: 36 New
          +8
          Do you agree to start a global war ?,
          Russia does not start a war, it ends them.
        4. voronbel53
          voronbel53 5 September 2015 13: 09 New
          +5
          Quote: oreax
          Do you agree to start a global war?

          Is it better not to get involved and give it back? .. And I would like to give someone to Israel, Palestine, for example, - there, too, the question is in full growth. What do you dispose of foreign territories, p.r.i.d.u.r.o.k!
          1. oreax
            oreax 5 September 2015 13: 29 New
            -8
            p.r.i.d.u.r.o.k! it's you!!!
            You said now I translate into Russian:
            I would like to give Russia the Urals.
            1. Name
              Name 5 September 2015 14: 14 New
              +5
              Quote: oreax
              You said now I translate into Russian:
            2. 33 Watcher
              33 Watcher 5 September 2015 16: 53 New
              0
              Here it is, cut your desert. There are no your interests here.
          2. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
            Vladimir Pozlnyakov 5 September 2015 16: 38 New
            +1
            And in addition to transfer 140 thousand of our chosen "
        5. Polite Moose
          Polite Moose 5 September 2015 19: 18 New
          +3
          Quote: oreax
          Do you agree to start a global war?


          Dear oreax. I see that you are specifically zaminusli, so with your permission I will intervene in the discussion.
          Your question about the readiness to start a global war was asked a little incorrectly. Of all those present on this site (from adults), no one wants any war. As for the results of the Great Patriotic War, for me and for the vast majority of Russian citizens (and not only), these results, I am not afraid of this word, are sacred. Both of my grandfathers died in this war. Editing a story will be for me a betrayal of their memory.
          And if you imagine the situation: Russia is at war (no matter with whom), the forces are unequal, defeat is inevitable, the use of nuclear weapons is necessary, the consequences are unpredictable, the Start button is in my hands, I won’t hesitate to press it.
      4. veksha50
        veksha50 5 September 2015 11: 04 New
        +5
        Quote: BilliBoms09
        the Russian army may hold a second run! "



        To begin with, within the framework of the month of Russian-Japanese "friendship", to open a new movie theater in Tokyo in Tokyo, in which to scroll some chronicle from the time of the Second World ...

        Entrance to the sessions, so be it, as part of a cultural exchange, to make free ...
      5. shans2
        shans2 5 September 2015 16: 55 New
        0
        Shamans, but I could be wrong
    5. Samaritan
      Samaritan 5 September 2015 10: 57 New
      +14
      The question is closed:
    6. Vend
      Vend 5 September 2015 11: 17 New
      +3
      Quote: Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!

      Let the Japanese consider how they want, there will be no revision of the issue. A peace treaty can be concluded, but why? Japan lined up under the USA, what is the use of a peace treaty with a non-independent country.
    7. KazaK Bo
      KazaK Bo 5 September 2015 11: 28 New
      +6
      Tor5
      Solved! Finally and irrevocably!

      How much more can you crush the water in the mortar.
      It is necessary for the State Duma and the Government to make a decision - to PUBLISH IN ALL OUR MEDIA, ON THE FIRST PAGE:
      - photo of the signing of the surrender of Japan
      - Text of surrender
      - Extract from the UN Charter
      - And only 3 phrases: WHAT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND FOR YOU yet, Mr. JAPANESE ??? IF THAT IS NOT EXPRESSLY - BEFORE YOUR INFORMATION - THIS IS THE LAST GOVERNMENT'S APPEAL TO THIS TOPIC, THE ISLAND AND THE KURIL IS CLOSED ONCE AND FOREVER IN 1945 !!! I wish you happiness, joy, peace and success in your personal life !!!!
      And indeed, completely close any discussion of this issue. And then too carried away by diplomacy! The Japanese feel this and become more and more impudent ... pull us into an unnecessary discussion ... Are there really no other worries ???
    8. Max_Bauder
      Max_Bauder 5 September 2015 12: 00 New
      +4
      There is always such an answer to the Japanese on their question laughing
    9. Appraiser
      Appraiser 5 September 2015 12: 21 New
      +3
      Not only is the decision irrevocable, but also not subject to appeal. soldier
    10. 222222
      222222 5 September 2015 14: 59 New
      +2
      After Fukushima, they would be silent in a Japanese rag ... laughing

      .. "... .. imagine what would happen if the Russians built Fukushima. After the disaster, all the media in Japan, the USA, the EU and the liberal Russian media would immediately spread this news, shouting about inept construction, about the danger to the whole world, etc. But Fukushima was built by the Americans. Therefore, this was mentioned only casually in Japan, and in Europe, and in Russia, and in the USA. No one began to fan the theme that the Americans did not take into account the risk of fairly frequent floods and the volcanic activity of the region. not taken into account, so not taken into account. No one claims. Even the Japanese. However, what to take from people who consider the USSR, having captured its Sakhalin and a couple of islands, as terrible barbarians, and the Americans, who destroyed almost 200 people with two bombs, benefactors and friends. »» »
  2. avvg
    avvg 5 September 2015 09: 55 New
    +8
    All these islands are ours rightfully, the USSR (Russia) resolutely put a bullet in the 02.09 1945g.
    1. Ribwort
      Ribwort 5 September 2015 10: 19 New
      +1
      Something like this ...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NbCY-xVPyU
      1. marlin1203
        marlin1203 5 September 2015 11: 01 New
        +4
        This year, through the UN, the Sea of ​​Okhotsk is finally recognized as the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation. And this question of Japan is like a bone in the throat, the sea is the richest, and now no one can enter it without our permission. So they are furious.
  3. vovanpain
    vovanpain 5 September 2015 09: 55 New
    +15
    Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.
    1. demon1978
      demon1978 5 September 2015 10: 01 New
      +3
      Quote: vovanpain
      Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.


      Let the production of Toyota, Sonya and everything else that they have left the way, transferred there, if they themselves do not have enough space, jobs and taxes will not hurt us !!! yes
      1. Temples
        Temples 5 September 2015 10: 18 New
        +1
        Let the production of Toyota, Sonya and everything else that they have left the way, they transfer there, if they themselves do not have enough space, jobs and taxes will not hurt us !!


        Offer to work for the Japs?
        What is the joy?
        Will the Japs give money?

        You need to think with your own head. And you need to work for yourself.
        1. demon1978
          demon1978 5 September 2015 10: 51 New
          0
          Quote: Temples
          And you need to work for yourself.

          China works for the whole world, but first of all it doesn’t soar for itself, just like South Korea, Malaysia, etc.

          Quote: Temples
          Will the Japs give money?


          Not only, first of all, technologies and specialists (our specialists, who will learn and work on these technologies, and not resell to each other any consumer goods of unknown origin and quality in city markets, sitting on unemployment benefits and fake disabilities)
          And the emergence of a “completely new”, although very similar enterprise in the neighborhood is a matter of not too long time. China is a vivid example of this yes

          Quote: Temples
          You need to think with your own head.

          I agree, it is necessary, but not like in Skolkovo request Loud statements are made, billions are lost, years go by ..... crying
    2. sanja.grw
      sanja.grw 5 September 2015 10: 14 New
      +15
      Yes, there are figs to you samurai, not the Kuril Islands.

      As Zhirik said, we can only give Hakamada to samurai
  4. Ross_ulair
    Ross_ulair 5 September 2015 09: 56 New
    +14
    And what do the Japanese promise in exchange? Peace treaty? What for? 70 years we live and not heavy lol

    Thank God that the fight-drunk did not have time to pass the yupps of the island in due time. And now these islands of our neighbors, like that elbow, are close, but you can’t bite yes
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 5 September 2015 09: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: ROSS_Ulair
      And now these islands of our neighbors, like that elbow, are close, but you can’t bite

      This is not a elbow, but a fist at the solar plexus.
    2. Vladimir Pozlnyakov
      Vladimir Pozlnyakov 5 September 2015 16: 42 New
      0
      JAPA for the Kurids, in addition to the peace treaty, promise to lift the sanctions!
      1. Ross_ulair
        Ross_ulair 5 September 2015 20: 06 New
        0
        Quote: Vladimir Pozlnyakov
        ... promise to lift the sanctions!


        Your hedgehog is twenty! Right! Urgently need to sign a petition to GDP - give urgently!
        wassat laughing
  5. Haettenschweiler
    Haettenschweiler 5 September 2015 09: 57 New
    -1
    I would suggest that the Japanese join the Federation as an autonomous republic.
    Then the Kuril Islands could be included in it.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 5 September 2015 10: 02 New
      +6
      Quote: Haettenschweiler
      Then the Kuril Islands could be included in it.

      Once included in the republic of the peninsula ... no
  6. kolkulon
    kolkulon 5 September 2015 09: 57 New
    +2
    Zhirik on this occasion correctly put it)))
  7. roskot
    roskot 5 September 2015 09: 57 New
    +1
    At one time, it was necessary to take Honshu and Shikoku. Now there would be no problems with the rest of the islands.
  8. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 5 September 2015 09: 59 New
    +4
    First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan

    Awesome awareness!
    1. wasjasibirjac
      wasjasibirjac 5 September 2015 10: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: Rokossovsky
      First of all, a peace treaty has not been concluded between Russia and Japan

      Awesome awareness!
      those. Japan and the Russian Federation, as the legal successor of the USSR, are at war, because the last decision was to declare war on Japan and demand unconditional surrender? Leningraders, do you have a factory of Toyta lying around there? will we trophy? it’s logical - the property of a country at war with us is subject to nationalization.
  9. Abbra
    Abbra 5 September 2015 09: 59 New
    +11
    Billions of years will pass. The entire population of the Earth has long been relocated to other planets, equip them, and heal in a new way. The last ship leaving the planet will leave a note: "The issue with the Kuril Islands has not yet been resolved" ...
    1. Rader
      Rader 5 September 2015 10: 19 New
      0
      While on Earth there is at least one Japanese:
      "The issue with the Kuril Islands has not yet been resolved" ...
      laughing
      1. iConst
        iConst 5 September 2015 12: 04 New
        +1
        Quote: Rader
        While on Earth there is at least one Japanese:
        ... The topic of boobs is not disclosed? smile

        PySy: Why is the Japanese capitalized? belay
  10. Voha_krim
    Voha_krim 5 September 2015 10: 00 New
    +4
    Question resolved - Our Kuril Islands! And we won’t give them to anyone! Moreover, we did not conquer them - we returned them !!! And there, as much as you want, "yap" for the sake of mattresses!
  11. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 5 September 2015 10: 00 New
    +4
    "The issue with the islands has not been resolved." Yah ? Well, the day begins! That SPACE agency of Ukraine made laugh, now here are the nippons. What is there Petrosyan with Stepanenko, so a pale shadow.
  12. 0255
    0255 5 September 2015 10: 01 New
    +8
    them and not the Kuril Islands. Former Samurai not protesting anything against US occupation request
    1. EvgNik
      EvgNik 5 September 2015 10: 30 New
      +4
      Quote: 0255
      Former Samurai not protesting anything against US occupation

      So the Japanas speak with the voice of America! They themselves have no rights to their big island. Conquerors damn it. Destroyed the indigenous population, like the same Anglo-Saxons in North America. And the samurai looks more like an insult (slap in the face).
  13. 79807420129
    79807420129 5 September 2015 10: 02 New
    +16
    The question was finally and irrevocably resolved in 1945. Calm down the samurai, otherwise you will have to do hara-kiri.
  14. zoknyay82
    zoknyay82 5 September 2015 10: 03 New
    +5
    Tired of this topic, few who consider what to be their own, Ukrainians such as Crimea, Argentina Foklenda, and nipons generally have the Sun on the flag, so what? Fly and own if not hot.
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 September 2015 10: 03 New
    +6
    after the end of World War II, all the Kuril Islands were included in the Soviet Union

    What other questions may be? Japan had to choose the right ally. And the fact that the United States is now more and more actively pushing Japan toward "resolving the issue of the northern territories" is of little concern to us. Maybe Japan should be concerned first of all with its native territories on which American bases are located?
    1. apro
      apro 5 September 2015 10: 19 New
      +3
      To date, Japan has occupied the SGA and all its statements should be considered Amer. The first began to review this issue Khrushchev or foolishly, or who in the ear puffed promised the islands two islands and away we go. The only option is to send Japan in a certain direction and survive SGA from the region.
  16. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 September 2015 10: 04 New
    +4
    Let them say thanks that Hokkaido did not begin to occupy. The Japanese really do not like the fact that our islands are a stone throw from them, and the Sea of ​​Okhotsk in this situation is our internal, we do not allow poaching. So this topic is eternal. Should Russia weaken, all the neighbors will immediately remember that we owe them something.
  17. dr.star75
    dr.star75 5 September 2015 10: 08 New
    +2
    A few years ago, the Yapis insistently demanded the Kuril Islands, I thought “now we’ll clash”, but then suddenly a power unit at the nuclear power plant crashed and they calmed down. Now they began to move again. So I think that only their nuclear bombardment calms them down? (NU Hiroshima Tipo, Fukushima?) E. until they shoot back at them, they don’t understand the normal conversation? Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right? And we roll a barrel on them?
    1. rotmistr60
      rotmistr60 5 September 2015 11: 06 New
      +1
      Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right? And we roll a barrel on them?

      Well, it's you in vain. And the Americans roll the barrel, not us. We are still forced to answer.
  18. Bosk
    Bosk 5 September 2015 10: 11 New
    +6
    These Japanese are strange, for Russia and almost all other countries the issue of Kuril’s accessories has long been resolved, but for Japan it’s not resolved ... they don’t have enough minds to unleash a weak war, but losing it and losing it what territories they cannot recognize ... It seems to me that they need these Kuril Islands as a “Claim” to Russia, because judge for yourself in all the negotiations this question is present, here is such a strange eastern philosophy, start all negotiations with claims ... look which "bonuses" and you can "cut off" ...
  19. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 5 September 2015 10: 13 New
    +3
    The Russian Federation voiced the official point of view that the issue with the Kuril Islands has been resolved a long time and the final results of WWII are recognized by all countries, including Japan, which is confirmed by their signature upon joining the UN, and are not subject to revision.
    In response, Japan handed a note of protest, where "expressed regret"
    What the Russian Foreign Ministry "expressed bewilderment" about the "expressed regret"
    The dialogue continues ...
  20. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 5 September 2015 10: 13 New
    +5
    Quote: dr.star75
    A few years ago, the Yapis insistently demanded the Kuril Islands, I thought “now we’ll clash”, but then suddenly a power unit at the nuclear power plant crashed and they calmed down. Now they began to move again. So I think that only their nuclear bombardment calms them down? (NU Hiroshima Tipo, Fukushima?) E. until they shoot back at them, they don’t understand the normal conversation? Maybe in 1945 the Americans were right? And we roll a barrel on them?


    You seem right, colleague. Then I read the other day how they opened their mouths after the Russo-Japanese War ... In turnips, only in turnips - a direct path to the Nippon brain.
  21. APASUS
    APASUS 5 September 2015 10: 15 New
    +1
    The issue of the islands cannot be resolved until we begin to ignore the raising of this issue by Japan.
    Earlier Sergey Lavrov commented
    Let it be in other words, but the legal meaning is this - do not touch anything, ”the minister explained. “We are returning them to the UN Charter, and here they cannot argue anything, and we can say that Japan is the only country that questions the outcome of World War II, no one else does it.”

    Here I would strongly disagree with Lavrov.
  22. MIKHAN
    MIKHAN 5 September 2015 10: 15 New
    +9
    Mother does not understand Japan! We can explain again!
  23. tomsk
    tomsk 5 September 2015 10: 18 New
    +6
    Well, this song is familiar to us. only labeled Misha and drunk Yeltsin sang along. it’s better for the Japanese to continue building islands from garbage.
  24. dirik
    dirik 5 September 2015 10: 25 New
    -7
    Our islands, I do not argue. And our government is aware that a decent life should be organized on our islands? And not only on the islands, but in all regions! You ask local residents if they like the attitude of our authorities towards them, whether they are paid decent pensions, whether they build roads, develop infrastructure ... or OUR, OUR ....
    1. Victorio
      Victorio 5 September 2015 15: 23 New
      +2
      Quote: dirik
      Our islands, I do not argue. And our government is aware that a decent life should be organized on our islands? And not only on the islands, but in all regions! You ask local residents if they like the attitude of our authorities towards them, whether they are paid decent pensions, whether they build roads, develop infrastructure ... or OUR, OUR ....

      ====
      life is getting better there, while they are investing in transport and production, the military will also make its contribution
  25. kot28.ru
    kot28.ru 5 September 2015 10: 29 New
    +3
    Quote: Tor5
    Solved! Finally and irrevocably!
  26. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 5 September 2015 10: 32 New
    +1
    The question of the so-called "Northern Territories" for Japan is primarily a question of domestic policy, one of the most important elements of the consolidation of Japanese society. And it does not affect questions of Russia's economic interests.
    And Japan will never be a political ally of our country, being a "reliable ally of the United States." Having large mutual territorial claims against China, which have become aggravated at the moment, I do not think that this Japanese "mantra" about the islands can cause any difficulties for Russia.
    Opinion is certainly subjective.
  27. atamankko
    atamankko 5 September 2015 10: 32 New
    +1
    Japanese, look at the realities of today
    eyes wide open and don’t listen to the USA,
    they have already proven their love for you in
    Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
  28. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 5 September 2015 10: 33 New
    +3
    No options! Either sign the peace treaty "as is", or our hands are untied.
  29. sv68
    sv68 5 September 2015 10: 35 New
    +2
    Especially for the Japanese, a new version of the old proverb - before you die you will not smoke !!!!!!!
  30. Tusv
    Tusv 5 September 2015 10: 36 New
    +3
    Or maybe send polite people to Hokkaido? And organize a referendum. Do you want to reunite with the Kuril Islands. There are two answers. Yes, not against and No, not against
  31. cte-power
    cte-power 5 September 2015 10: 41 New
    +3
    a powerful Russian naval military base must be built on these islands - all the more so since the location of the islands is more than strategic

    airport - required

    and even - if the climate allowed - to let tourist investors (including Japanese ones) - even without taxes for 30 years - build a Russian tourist cluster and establish a free economic zone with a free trade and fishing port - let Japanese fishermen bypass their taxes
    1. cuzmin.mihail2013
      cuzmin.mihail2013 5 September 2015 18: 47 New
      0
      “In the Kuril Islands, we need a modern combat-ready military force. And at the moment, on the basis of the decisions of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, all the conditions for this have been created, ”the Russian prime minister noted during a recent visit to the Kuril Islands.
  32. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 5 September 2015 10: 41 New
    +1
    The verdict is final and not subject to appeal! Our Kuril Islands and let the narrow-eyed lips roll up their lips and swallow their drooling!
  33. Snob
    Snob 5 September 2015 10: 43 New
    +1
    Ours were ready to sign a peace treaty with the transfer of 2 islands, but the japanes demanded 4th. And in the current situation, they can forget about 2a islands ...
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 5 September 2015 10: 55 New
      +1
      Quote: Snob
      Ours were ready to sign a peace treaty with the transfer of 2 islands, but the japanes demanded 4th. And in the current situation, they can forget about 2a islands ..



      The proverb "greed fraer ruined" - in real life embodiment ...

      But you could take advantage, take two islands, and then again continue the same nagging about the other two ...

      Now they certainly won't ...
  34. roskot
    roskot 5 September 2015 10: 44 New
    0
    This is for the Japanese, he remained open. But for us there is no question. We are settling in.
  35. Santjaga_Garka
    Santjaga_Garka 5 September 2015 10: 50 New
    +1
    Lavrov well done, he knows how to poke his face where it is necessary, it is a pity that some, having pulled out their faces and licked their lips, do not calm down, but wait for a new poke *)

    By the way, Vitaly Churkin is also very good at doing this *)
  36. narval20
    narval20 5 September 2015 10: 54 New
    +4
    As an option bully
  37. The comment was deleted.
  38. Pate
    Pate 5 September 2015 10: 55 New
    +1
    They were and will remain ours forever and let them not pretend to them!
  39. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 5 September 2015 10: 58 New
    +2
    ... bald all over his face, not the Kuril Islands. In vain, Stalin canceled the landing in Hokkaido. Now there would be no questions on the Kuril Islands.
  40. ltx777
    ltx777 5 September 2015 10: 59 New
    +3
    I would not think of the Kuril issue in place of the Japanese, but would begin to dump new islands. If you look in 10 years, Japanese territories would appear where you can calmly settle in. Japan still has a lot of problems with China, so we should not think about acquiring new lands, but about how to keep our own. It is clear that they broadcast mattress ideas, but only wherever you poke your nose, death and chaos are devastating. I think ordinary Japanese people do not want them to be cannon fodder for Americans. If you want to try to pick them up, you are welcome .... there will be enough land for everyone in the amount of 2x2x1,5 m. For 70 years we have lived without a peace treaty with Japan, and it seems like nothing bad happened. Japanese cars, electronics, rolls, I love all this very much)))) therefore gentlemen samurai live in friendship with Russia !!!
  41. Butt
    Butt 5 September 2015 11: 01 New
    +3
    Yapi behave like dill: they declare Russia an enemy and demand a discount on gas, and in Tokyo, Taldychat - the war is not over with Russia, throw at least a couple of islands to the samurai.
    Or maybe in addition to you the key to the apartment where the money is?
  42. stonks
    stonks 5 September 2015 11: 11 New
    +2
    Japanese robots!
    As an experienced and experienced person, I recommend you to forget about the “Kuril issue”. Forever.
    So as not to spoil your nerves and to expose your government as idiots in front of your own people.
    The investigation is over Forget !!!
  43. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 5 September 2015 11: 22 New
    +3
    Sweet Hokkaido
    I'm you Honshu.
    For your shikoku
    I am Kyushu. All is not enough for them, how many islands have
  44. lopvlad
    lopvlad 5 September 2015 11: 23 New
    +1
    Tokyo: the issue with the Kuriles is not resolved

    resolved since you lost the war in the 40s.
  45. Victor Wolz
    Victor Wolz 5 September 2015 11: 32 New
    +2
    They lost the Kuril Islands as a result of the war, they can be returned only by victory in a new war or an equivalent exchange for Alaska. How they wring it out from Amerika does not bother us anymore.)))
  46. Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 5 September 2015 11: 33 New
    0
    On Thursday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov stated that the issue of the Kuril Islands was “resolved 70 years ago” and “there is no dialogue with Tokyo on the“ Kuril problem ”.

    Moscow’s position is that the southern Kuril Islands became part of the USSR as a result of World War II, and Russian sovereignty over them, having the appropriate international legal design, is not in doubt
    .
    Then the Japanese once again became sweet .... wassat
    The head of the European Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, Hajime Hayashi, on Friday conveyed a protest to the Russian ambassador to Tokyo, Evgeny Afanasyev, and stated that "the statement is unacceptable."

    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20150904/1228568304.html#ixzz3kqZUO06O
    .

    And it’s acceptable to express dissatisfaction and protests about the trips of Russian officials throughout Russia (Medvedev’s trip to the Kuril Islands

    Only 14% of the former residents of the southern Kuril Islands and their descendants interviewed by NHK broadcaster believe that the islands of Iturup, Shikotan, Kunashir and Habomai will be returned to Japan.
    Most of the Japanese who lived until 1945 on the islands of Iturup, Shikotan, Kunashir and Habomai do not believe that these islands will return to Japan, such conclusions follow from a questionnaire conducted by NHK.
    The survey involved former residents, as well as their children and grandchildren born after the islands were occupied by troops of the Soviet Army in August 1945. Only 14% of respondents said they believed that the islands would be returned to Japan, while 49% thought that this would not happen.


    RIA Novosti http://ria.ru/world/20150904/1228972936.html#ixzz3kqazlt63
  47. Alexey Boukin
    Alexey Boukin 5 September 2015 11: 37 New
    +2
    Quote: Haettenschweiler
    They do not offer anything interesting in return. One thing only: "Give!" And so things are not done ... you are to me - I am to you, and nothing else.

    Trading your land is criminal! It is necessary to honor the memory of Soviet soldiers who fell in battles for these islands. For them, it was the EARTH, for which they paid with their lives.
  48. antikilller55
    antikilller55 5 September 2015 12: 12 New
    +1
    "Japan cannot accept the fact that the four northern islands following the results of World War II became the territory of Russia."
    So these are your personal national difficulties, gentlemen, the Japanese, live with them and suffer or turn over this page and live with what you have, reconciled. In general, I fully support the answer of our Foreign Minister, you can’t say better.
  49. Strashila
    Strashila 5 September 2015 12: 13 New
    +2
    "Japan is the only country that questions the outcome of the Second World War, no one else does this" ... they say what they wrote to the rulers of the occupying American troops ... word for word, current and nothing else.
    1. HMR333
      HMR333 5 September 2015 15: 40 New
      0
      mistake Ukraine is also not .....))))
  50. igoryok1984
    igoryok1984 5 September 2015 13: 07 New
    +1
    And I believe that the issue with the island of Okinawa, annexed by japs ​​in 1879, has not been resolved. And I can not accept the fact of the occupation of the Ryukyu Islands!