Global Firepower presented an updated ranking of the armies of the world

Global Firepower portal has published a regular ranking of the armies of the world. The rating reportedly takes into account the nuclear potentials of states, the economic security of armies, geographical factors affecting the use of armed forces and other aspects. For each of these points, an army of a state was assigned a certain coefficient, and, based on a general analysis of the coefficients, a rating table was created.


In the top three rankings Global Firepower Army of the United States of America, Russia and China. The Israeli army, according to experts who analyzed the potentials of the army, did not make it to the top ten, taking a position in the 11 rating. The army of Ukraine was put on the 25 line - this is between the armies of Sweden and Singapore. It should be noted that in the previous rating of the Global Firepower APU were placed four lines higher. The army of Belarus in this list is in 45-th place, which is two positions above the line, which is determined by the army of Argentina. And the army of Estonia is called the weakest army among the NATO member countries - 108 is a place from 126.

Global Firepower presented an updated ranking of the armies of the world


If you believe the data presented in the Global Firepower ranking, the Russian army holds the lead in number tanks. The portal reports that the RF Armed Forces are armed with more than 15,3 thousand tanks.
Photos used:
http://www.globalfirepower.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

275 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 03 New
    • 102
    • 0
    +102
    0.1865 + 0.2315 = good))) Well, except for jokes, the Americans are not in the first place. They can pull off a plane, and then refugees around the world run around. Ugh on them!
    1. MIKHAN 4 September 2015 19: 12 New
      • 124
      • 0
      +124
      Bullshit all these ratings! No army can compare with Russia in experience and fighting spirit! It’s in our blood ..... 145 million controls such a territory! Who else wants to test us for a little tooth?
      1. shooter18 4 September 2015 19: 25 New
        • 56
        • 0
        +56
        Yeah and all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked))
        1. Truth 4 September 2015 20: 05 New
          • 46
          • 0
          +46
          Quote: shooter18
          all the "conquerors" who came

          Herein lies the chip of the effectiveness of the Army, not in the ability to attack abruptly, but in the ability to protect the population of their homeland, and even with great blood, both their own and that of others (this is desirable multiple), to resolve the conflict in their favor.
          Russia will not be left alone, we still have to bury the carcasses of foreign "military tourists" on our land ... there is enough room for everyone in mass graves.
          1. Alexander_ 4 September 2015 20: 55 New
            • 12
            • 0
            +12
            Their carcasses are better left on their territory, unless there is another use for their territory.
            1. Truth 4 September 2015 21: 00 New
              • 22
              • 0
              +22
              Quote: Alexander_
              there is no other use of its territory

              Don’t be capricious, this is a centuries-old tradition - we’ll bury the impudent and curious at home, but we will “carefully settle” the cautious and indecisive in their local graveyards.
            2. Linkor9s21 4 September 2015 23: 38 New
              • 13
              • 0
              +13
              25th place in Ukraine? She was still very flattered! I would not include her in the top 100.
              1. sovetskyturist 5 September 2015 00: 00 New
                • 13
                • 0
                +13
                Well, experts and analysts can give out a lot of interesting things. The only question is whether it’s worth breaking your mind over their conclusions.
                1. Talgat 5 September 2015 01: 10 New
                  • 13
                  • 0
                  +13
                  And also note that they have Australia with 15 million of the population and an incomprehensible army (well, there’s a fleet of some kind) there is 13 place

                  And much more powerful countries like Brazil, Vietnam or Iran are in 21-23 places

                  T e rating does not reflect the principle of "who whom - one on one"
                  1. Baikonur 5 September 2015 09: 55 New
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    +5
                    If, on a one-on-one basis, given the will and nature of the army, then I would give 1st place to Russia and China, then Vietnam. USA - I don’t even know where with my rabble of deserters and stupid generals! And Urkaina would not be in the top at all!
                  2. skeket 5 September 2015 14: 16 New
                    • 5
                    • 0
                    +5
                    Quote: Talgat
                    T e rating does not reflect the principle of "who whom - one on one"

                    Yes, in this case, too, is not easy to compare, because the theater of operations is of great importance. Take, for example, the conflict between the United States and the Russian Federation, agree that a clash between the armed forces of these countries somewhere in Syria or Ukraine, and in the Pacific or in the Arctic is absolutely different things.
                    PS. Well, countries with nuclear weapons should automatically occupy the first lines of the rating, as they possess weapons of monstrous destructive power
                    1. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 12 New
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      +2
                      Quote: skeket
                      Yes, in this case, too, is not easy to compare, because the theater of operations is of great importance. Take, for example, the conflict between the United States and the Russian Federation, agree that a clash between the armed forces of these countries somewhere in Syria or Ukraine, and in the Pacific or in the Arctic is absolutely different things.

                      They removed the language, the strength of the US Army is the developed logistics, yes, the Russian army is invincible, but only near its borders. After all, there is an example of a war of strong Germans against weak Britons with developed logistics and large resources - in North Africa.
                2. Sergey-8848 5 September 2015 05: 13 New
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  +11
                  Interestingly, on the first map, geographers from Fox News Egypt to Iraq’s place got bogged down.
                  1. Vlad74 Q 5 September 2015 05: 27 New
                    • 7
                    • 0
                    +7
                    Yeah! And in the second Ukraine stuck in Iran. Morons, bl ...! (FROM)
                    1. TVM - 75 5 September 2015 08: 28 New
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      +4
                      And what after that? What questions can these "analysts" have? Only A FILL YOU? Or is that enough? laughing
                  2. Tomorrow's War 5 September 2015 07: 38 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Maybe they have such cards in the country))) And in FoxNews, I don’t know!)))
                  3. Legionnaire14 6 September 2015 10: 27 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    I also did not believe it at first.))))) And then I realized, ONE, everything is at the level of Bush Jr.)))
              2. gav6757 5 September 2015 02: 00 New
                • 5
                • 0
                +5
                Probably the rest is even worse, according to the Americans!
                Americans are really cunning. They set Vietnam far, apparently they remember how they received it in the face !!!
                Still surprising is the lack of North Korea, I think that in organization and training, stronger than Canada, in any ...
              3. Andrew 5 September 2015 07: 34 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                I agree, what the fuck, 25th, without aviation and navy? fool
              4. yugan 7 September 2015 18: 42 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Definitely DNR-LC ahead of them in any case will be!
            3. 71ss_man 6 September 2015 11: 42 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              A FERTILITY is not necessary
          2. Iskander-Khan 4 September 2015 21: 01 New
            • 10
            • 0
            +10
            The efficiency counter of the Army is its ability = to anticipate the possibility of preventing it from protecting the state and the population and to respond appropriately for the Thief to be disastrous. To do this, it is necessary = to feed your Army to fight with TABETURES and LADIES = to abide by the law and be a CITIZEN OF YOUR FATHERLAND - RUSSIAN -Remind the roots and History of your state Do not feed your Army; you will feed; -army of your Thief
          3. Deniska 5 September 2015 11: 00 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            and in the ability to protect the population of his homeland, and even with great blood


            This is the problem. I read somewhere that if it weren’t for the 1st and 2nd worlds with the civil war, the Russian population would be under 400 million. That’s sad !!! That we are only 140 million. And what will we do when China trample? And he will trample it a matter of time, whatever illusions you build about friendship. He will go across the border in small groups of 4-5 million people ....
            1. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 16 New
              • -1
              • 0
              -1
              Quote: Deniska
              I read somewhere that if it weren’t for the 1st and 2nd worlds with the civil war, the Russian population would be under 400 million. That’s sad !!! That we are only 140 million

              You are shifting the problem from a sick head to a healthy one. We are few because we gave women too many rights and now they are realizing their main right - the right not to give birth to children. Wars China was not prevented from growing demographically, as well as some other countries.
          4. Santjaga_Garka 5 September 2015 11: 14 New
            • -4
            • 0
            -4
            Mother Earth loves such fertilizer, because in Russia fields have always given birth well *)
          5. shonsu 7 September 2015 15: 54 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            the earth is poor, fertilizers are needed. )
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Iskander-Khan 4 September 2015 20: 47 New
          • 15
          • 0
          +15
          why let them come ... and then ... They raked And how much in this interval .. suffered and perished The army must defend to warn and respond appropriately These things depend on us For we have many enemies ... Our duty is to provide the Army with everything necessary to protect yourself ... relatives
          1. alexander 2 4 September 2015 23: 15 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Generally true. That's just "warn" should not the army, but diplomats. And the army should be such that it would never occur to anyone to attack us. However, these are common truths.
        4. scientist 4 September 2015 20: 56 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: shooter18
          all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked

          This is because they will first calculate the military potential, make a rating, and only then start a war.
          It is good that the Russian generals do not read the ratings. Otherwise, Suvorov would never have decided to go with his army through the Alps to Paris, and the Soviet troops to Berlin.
          An interesting position of Kazakhstan at 66th place, after Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan. In my opinion, a fairly objective assessment despite the demagogy and window dressing of Kazakhstani politicians.
          1. Rarog 4 September 2015 21: 02 New
            • 11
            • 0
            +11
            Quote: scientist
            Otherwise, would Suvorov never decide to go with his army through the Alps to Paris ...


            Paris was a little the other way from its route lol but the feat of an unprecedented transition is unshakable!
            1. scientist 4 September 2015 21: 15 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Quote: Rarog
              Paris was a little the other way

              it's a pity. After all, there was an opportunity. Then you look and there was no burned Moscow in 1812, but at 14, you still had to take Paris.
            2. vsoltan 4 September 2015 23: 08 New
              • 5
              • 0
              +5
              Of course, one of many examples of the Russian heroic soul. ... who could? Rudnev in Chemulpo? Smog. Panfilovtsi, Brest Fortress, Perm Riot Police? Could. ... there are no examples. ... and so can only Russian people. ... that’s not the point. ... the essence of politics. ... and what was the point in general in Suvorov’s Italian campaign? What benefits did he bring to Russia? As well as in the Balkan wars, RI was not able to use the possible benefits. ... Army, People. ... an eternal example for the "Germans" (not speaking Russian, I mean), but politicians have forever sold our Army and Our people. . ..
              1. shooter cc 4 September 2015 23: 51 New
                • -28
                • 0
                -28
                Quote: vsoltan
                Of course, one of many examples of the Russian heroic soul. ... who could? Rudnev in Chemulpo? Smog. Panfilovtsi, Brest Fortress, Perm Riot Police? Could. ... there are no examples. ... and so can only Russian people. ... that’s not the point. ... the essence of politics. ... and what was the point in general in Suvorov’s Italian campaign? What benefits did he bring to Russia? As well as in the Balkan wars, RI was not able to use the possible benefits. ... Army, People. ... an eternal example for the "Germans" (not speaking Russian, I mean), but politicians have forever sold our Army and Our people. . ..

                The Brest Fortress is generally a failure; about Panfilov’s, everything was not so.
                1. Aljavad 5 September 2015 00: 17 New
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  +8
                  about panfilovtsev generally all was not so.


                  Everything has always been different than it really is.

                  each participant sees his tiny piece of a huge picture, his Truth.

                  To correctly describe “how everything was”, the work of the lives of hundreds of scientists in hundreds of volumes is needed, to read everything is still a feat.

                  But only the Great Artist is able to create an ARTISTIC IMAGE, which will capaciously, accurately and succinctly express this Truth.

                  Here is the image and will remain for centuries. And the volumes of historians will gather dust in storage.
                  1. shooter cc 5 September 2015 00: 26 New
                    • -19
                    • 0
                    -19
                    Quote: Aljavad
                    about panfilovtsev generally all was not so.


                    Everything has always been different than it really is.

                    each participant sees his tiny piece of a huge picture, his Truth.

                    To correctly describe “how everything was”, the work of the lives of hundreds of scientists in hundreds of volumes is needed, to read everything is still a feat.

                    But only the Great Artist is able to create an ARTISTIC IMAGE, which will capaciously, accurately and succinctly express this Truth.

                    Here is the image and will remain for centuries. And the volumes of historians will gather dust in storage.

                    No need to distort the history of thin images, I want the full truth and not a miserable invented ersatz.
                    1. Cat man null 5 September 2015 01: 10 New
                      • 13
                      • 0
                      +13
                      Quote: shooter cc
                      No need to distort the history of thin images

                      About Panfilov’s chewed here a month ago. It was - it was not - it doesn’t matter.

                      - there was a version of the event that was submitted to the entire country of the USSR. Then, in 1941
                      - this version was accepted and popularly approved (although, of course, without a referendum laughing)
                      - And you don’t climb there with dirty paws .. "it wasn’t so" .. yeah well ..

                      Quote: shooter cc
                      I want the full truth and not a miserable invented ersatz.

                      Want is not harmful..
                      1. shooter cc 5 September 2015 12: 22 New
                        • -2
                        • 0
                        -2
                        Quote: Cat Man Null
                        Quote: shooter cc
                        No need to distort the history of thin images

                        About Panfilov’s chewed here a month ago. It was - it was not - it doesn’t matter.

                        - there was a version of the event that was submitted to the entire country of the USSR. Then, in 1941
                        - this version was accepted and popularly approved (although, of course, without a referendum laughing)
                        - And you don’t climb there with dirty paws .. "it wasn’t so" .. yeah well ..

                        Quote: shooter cc
                        I want the full truth and not a miserable invented ersatz.

                        Want is not harmful..

                        It doesn’t matter to you, but it’s even very, very important to me, and most importantly interesting. I don’t think that someone accepted this version and approved, they simply made me believe it. on their own and others' mistakes, they are already potential slaves, the gray mass of which can be turned on your own. For example, America and Western Europe, warped facts of history, and simply frankly false facts about various events, including WWII, make them attack now on the same rake. And we all think why they are so incomprehensible.
                      2. Sergey Vl. 5 September 2015 13: 25 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        True truth is TRUTH, and only the Creator knows it.
                      3. shooter cc 5 September 2015 16: 30 New
                        • -2
                        • 0
                        -2
                        Quote: Sergey Vl.
                        True truth is TRUTH, and only the Creator knows it.

                        But I’m not talking about absolute truth, and what event was crucial for the fate of different countries in the future. Maybe the defeat of the Red Army in 1941 was good for the further fate of planet Earth, because Stalin would have defeated Hitler by the end of November-December 1941 He wouldn’t be satisfied with Germany alone. All of Europe would fall at his feet, and then Asia and so on, until the world revolution would be completely victorious. But Hitler wasn’t even turned to its fullest, because fascism and socialism are one field of berries. in essence, they cannot exist and live long. And so one fire extinguished another fire, and the balance in the world stabilized a little. I HAVE SEEN HISTORICAL FACTS WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN COMPLETED, AND THERE IS NO NEED TO BE REVIEWED THERE.
                    2. poquello 5 September 2015 13: 35 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: shooter cc
                      It doesn’t matter to you, but it’s even very, very important to me, and most importantly interesting. I don’t think that someone accepted this version and approved, they simply made me believe it. on their own and others' mistakes, ....

                      I agree, in general, in that story the ass began when the killed Panfilovites began to appear from captivity, everything is available - scans from the originals
                    3. Cat man null 5 September 2015 13: 57 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Quote: shooter cc
                      It’s not important for you, but it’s even very, very important to me, and most importantly, interesting

                      Why would it be so sudden? wink

                      Quote: shooter cc
                      I don’t think that someone accepted this version and approved, it’s just made to believe in it

                      No one forced, they simply believed in her. Against the background of the events of that time, there was a completely normal version for myself, no?

                      Quote: shooter cc
                      The people have the right to know their UNCLEARED HISTORY

                      Yeah .. I remember a horse in a vacuum for some reason ..

                      Quote: shooter cc
                      people who do not know her cannot learn from their own and others' mistakes

                      That is - brought up in the USSR - "could not learn from their own and others' mistakes"? Bugaga laughing

                      Total: all these “distortions of history” and its corrections (including the history of the USSR) - for some reason, all of them are directed towards negation .. The Kulikovo battle was “not”, Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya was “not”, Panfilovtsev here - also "was not" .. Who benefits?

                      Something like this..
                    4. poquello 5 September 2015 14: 40 New
                      • -3
                      • 0
                      -3
                      Quote: Cat Man Null

                      That is - brought up in the USSR - "could not learn from their own and others' mistakes"? Bugaga laughing

                      ..

                      but in vain you laugh, the USSR was a country of frightened idiots, hence destinies broke, it is very easy to believe in another lie when they trample on argument that you considered your whole life to be the truth
                    5. Cat man null 5 September 2015 14: 49 New
                      • 3
                      • 0
                      +3
                      Quote: poquello
                      The USSR was a country of frightened idiots ..

                      ... yeah, especially in comparison with what we have right now .. you are somehow old, dear, to draw such conclusions - you would have to live 20-30 at least in the USSR at least .. I did it, but you?
                    6. poquello 5 September 2015 15: 52 New
                      • -4
                      • 0
                      -4
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      Quote: poquello
                      The USSR was a country of frightened idiots ..

                      ... yeah, especially in comparison with what we have right now .. you are somehow old, dear, to draw such conclusions - you would have to live 20-30 at least in the USSR at least .. I did it, but you?

                      now we have a country of sober people even drunk

                      Do you want to say something from personal impressions of that period, or so for years to shake?
                      Khrushchev at the helm did not find, but not about his time conversation.
                    7. Cat man null 5 September 2015 18: 15 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Quote: poquello
                      now we have a country of sober people even drunk

                      Aphoristic. But - unrealistic. Do you believe in what you said?

                      Quote: poquello
                      You want to say something from personal impressions of that period ..

                      Exactly. The USSR was by no means a "country of frightened idiots." At least in my circle of friends, the percentage of those did not exceed the permissible deviation from the norm request

                      Quote: poquello
                      or so - shake for years?
                      Khrushchev at the helm did not find, but not about his time conversation

                      Well, what are our years .. when Khrushchev was gone, I was just learning to read .. in kindergarten, the alphabet .. and in the picture in the alphabet was just Khrushch laughing
                    8. poquello 5 September 2015 22: 42 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Quote: Cat Man Null
                      Quote: poquello
                      now we have a country of sober people even drunk

                      Aphoristic. But - unrealistic. Do you believe in what you said?

                      Absolutely, in the context of the topic, the bulk of the citizens of Russia are sure that we are not welcome in the west, and if they are happy, it is only when it is beneficial to the bourgeoisie or weakens Russia.
                      Quote: Cat Man Null

                      Exactly. The USSR was by no means a "country of frightened idiots." At least in my circle of friends, the percentage of those did not exceed the permissible deviation from the norm request

                      Che and there was no talk about peace, friendship, chewing gum? What right now will we reconcile and Western benefits will flow to us? That we’ll go west, we are sorely missed there, and we are so classy that we need to pay money because we have money, and the bourgeois’s allowance is greater than our salaries, the bourgeois will teach us how to live beautifully and richly, because the bourgeoisie has everything beautiful and rich.
                      Forgotten? - take a look at Makarevich - the especially stubborn charm of the west has still not passed, well, or at the dill - their disappointment is just beginning
              2. Mother Theresa 7 September 2015 08: 47 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                In something you are right, I recall the numerous kitchen conversations of the times of perestroika. What they say is like there, in the west, all the locksmiths and the turner, teachers, etc., etc. live on cars in country houses. And we have taken all the nomenclature for ourselves and you just have to drop them and here we will live. Hurray Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
              3. Mother Theresa 7 September 2015 08: 47 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                In something you are right, I recall the numerous kitchen conversations of the times of perestroika. What they say is like there, in the west, all the locksmiths and the turner, teachers, etc., etc. live on cars in country houses. And we have taken all the nomenclature for ourselves and you just have to drop them and here we will live. Hurray Gorbachev and Yeltsin.
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. shooter cc 5 September 2015 16: 57 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              Quote: shooter cc
              It’s not important for you, but it’s even very, very important to me, and most importantly, interesting

              Why would it be so sudden? wink

              Quote: shooter cc
              I don’t think that someone accepted this version and approved, it’s just made to believe in it

              No one forced, they simply believed in her. Against the background of the events of that time, there was a completely normal version for myself, no?

              Quote: shooter cc
              The people have the right to know their UNCLEARED HISTORY

              Yeah .. I remember a horse in a vacuum for some reason ..

              Quote: shooter cc
              people who do not know her cannot learn from their own and others' mistakes

              That is - brought up in the USSR - "could not learn from their own and others' mistakes"? Bugaga laughing

              Total: all these “distortions of history” and its corrections (including the history of the USSR) - for some reason, all of them are directed towards negation .. The Kulikovo battle was “not”, Zoe Kosmodemyanskaya was “not”, Panfilovtsev here - also "was not" .. Who benefits?

              Something like this..

              Not suddenly, and not now, but since the mid-eighties of the last century. And if you didn’t believe then, you would have vividly kicked this crap out of you. And about historical mistakes I had in mind a wider time period, not the times of socialism.
          2. GSVG 5 September 2015 23: 05 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Respected. Do you have few true examples of recent history ??? Like that: Afghanistan, Chechnya or the same "massacre" in Beslan !!!!!!!!!!!!!! The images you need! ???
      2. Deniska 5 September 2015 11: 03 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I want the full truth and not a miserable invented ersatz.


        Duck ran into the archives ... And do not sit in the VO!
        1. shooter cc 5 September 2015 11: 32 New
          • -3
          • 0
          -3
          Quote: Deniska
          I want the full truth and not a miserable invented ersatz.


          Duck ran into the archives ... And do not sit in the VO!

          So they won’t let me into the archives for a cannon shot, as well as everyone who does not have special access. But for those who already have access, they take subscriptions from them so that you do not blunder too much, otherwise they will be held criminally liable. Gentlemen, military historians don’t blather, they earn money on a bun with red caviar, well, who wants to stand under the punishing sword of justice, and no one. And they keep secrets oh how vigilantly, although 70 years have passed, and there are no state secrets there there’s no mention, but no, we won’t show it all. And if we open it a bit, take our word for it, because we can’t show the documents ourselves. That's how people have been fooled for decades, and we won’t stop this for a long time .
        2. hrough 6 September 2015 14: 03 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: shooter cc
          So they won’t let me into the archives for a cannon shot, as well as everyone who does not have special access. But for those who already have access, they take subscriptions from them so that you do not blunder too much, otherwise they will be held criminally liable. Gentlemen, military historians don’t blather, they earn money on a bun with red caviar, well, who wants to stand under the punishing sword of justice, and no one. And they keep secrets oh how vigilantly, although 70 years have passed, and there are no state secrets there there’s no mention, but no, we won’t show it all. And if we open it a bit, take our word for it, because we can’t show the documents ourselves. That's how people have been fooled for decades, and we won’t stop this for a long time .

          It seems to me that each state has its skeleton in the closet. And if anyone is "interested", then let him delve into these "cabinets" and leave everything to himself, and the rest (who are not "interested") will "eat" the story that he is offered. And it’s better to let this story be heroic. Mikhail Lomonosov: “A people who do not know their past have no future.” On a heroic past, it is easier to build a heroic future.
        3. shooter cc 6 September 2015 17: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: urch
          It seems to me that each state has its skeleton in the closet. And if anyone is "interested", then let him delve into these "cabinets" and leave everything to himself, and the rest (who are not "interested") will "eat" the story that he is offered. And it’s better to let this story be heroic. Mikhail Lomonosov: “A people who do not know their past have no future.” On a heroic past, it is easier to build a heroic future.

          Well, the Ukrainians have been striking since the beginning of the 90th, about what kind of heroes they were invincible all the time, and all garbage like that. Did this "heroic" past help them now? Yes, it most likely prevented. For their truth was implicated in lies. So, they stepped on the same rake, and who got better from it?
        4. hrough 6 September 2015 21: 10 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: shooter cc
          Well, the Ukrainians have been striking since the beginning of the 90th, about what kind of heroes they were invincible all the time, and all garbage like that. Did this "heroic" past help them now? Yes, it most likely prevented. For their truth was implicated in lies. So, they stepped on the same rake, and who got better from it?
          Anything could be boiled up, and the result would hardly have been different. It all depended on why. Obviously not to create a state with a heroic future.
        5. shooter cc 6 September 2015 23: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: urch
          Anything could be boiled up, and the result would hardly have been different. It all depended on why. Obviously not to create a state with a heroic future.

          But I don’t think so, if I had been brought up in the spirit of friendship towards fraternal peoples, and the unacceptability of various fascist and nationalist ideals. But it wouldn’t be possible to raise them for any Maidan, and even more so for military operations against their own.
  • asiat_61 5 September 2015 00: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    You, about Thomas, and you about Yeryoma.
  • MREDBEST 4 September 2015 21: 03 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    But I’m still wondering where in this ranking of the DPRK?
    1. gozmosZh 4 September 2015 21: 10 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      everything is secret there.
      no data. closed country.
  • meriem1 4 September 2015 21: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: shooter18
    Yeah and all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked))



    And they’ll come ... and they’ll rake at the very least!
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Ustian 4 September 2015 21: 27 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Quote: shooter18
    Yeah and all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked))

    1. startup 4 September 2015 23: 58 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      https://youtu.be/noMomxC_A_o и вотhttps://youtu.be/MN1gb1sS69o
    2. TVM - 75 5 September 2015 08: 37 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Thanks for the video! Hello !!!! drinks And it always will be!
  • BilliBoms09 4 September 2015 22: 03 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    The Israeli army, according to experts who analyzed the potentials of the army, was not in the top ten, taking 11th position in the ranking
    Something that our friends from Israel cannot hear, the IDF was lowered, it was overtaken by the USA who had not fought for 70 years and were under US protection: Japan, Germany and South Korea.
    1. Aljavad 5 September 2015 00: 18 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      thus, the IDF was lowered, it was overtaken by those who had not fought for 70 years and who were under the protection of the USA: Japan, the Federal Republic of Germany and South Korea.


      Here is the price of the rating.
  • Penzyac 5 September 2015 04: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: shooter18
    Yeah and all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked))

    And they didn’t just rake it off, but first they came to us, and then we went to visit them, in their capital ...
    They all started for health, and ended for peace ...
  • VladimirRG 7 September 2015 06: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yeah and all the "conquerors" who came to us throughout history, reached Moscow and raked)) - and stayed with us to live.
  • kapitan281271 7 September 2015 08: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Often they did NOT reach!
  • kocclissi 4 September 2015 19: 25 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Soaping the eyes of the so-called "world obschelstvennosti" they say we are the first on the planet of the whole ... who do you put: on a karate athlete or on a melee melee who has been beaten by life?
    1. Iskander-Khan 4 September 2015 21: 06 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      ... on a melee fighter who has been beaten with life - HE IS A FIGHTER ... like this somehow ..
      1. Aljavad 5 September 2015 00: 22 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        ... on a melee fighter who has been beaten with life - HE IS A FIGHTER ... like this somehow ..


        so he is in a dirty leotard. And not shaved at all! belay
        And the karate is all in white, handsome! That's what a champion should look like. winked
  • andj61 4 September 2015 19: 26 New
    • 26
    • 0
    +26
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Bullshit all these ratings!

    Of course, bullshit! good The war between Russia and the United States is possible only as the last salute of civilization - and how can they be compared! request
    True, 1 million fighters in SUCH territory - this is negligible!
    In only one German Army Group Center in June 1941 there were almost 1,5 million soldiers.
    True, a small army only confirms that Russia is not going to attack anyone. soldier
    1. Eugene-Eugene 4 September 2015 20: 43 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Only in one German Army Group Center in June 1941 had almost 1,5 million soldiers.

      Incorrect comparison. In those days, the armies were completely different. The power of a single statistical fighter was ten times less. So share.
      1. alexander 2 4 September 2015 23: 45 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Invalid comparison. The power supply of the enemy soldier increased by the same amount. So no need to share.
    2. aviator65 4 September 2015 20: 49 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: andj61
      True, 1 million fighters in SUCH territory - this is negligible!
      In only one German Army Group Center in June 1941 there were almost 1,5 million soldiers.

      Why compare the peacetime army and the army during the war. You consider mobilization reserves. The number of personnel in wartime divisions is by definition higher. What puzzles us is the number of modern models of military equipment in our troops. Here with the mob. the reserve can really be problems, if something happens, God forbid.
    3. Iskander-Khan 4 September 2015 21: 15 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      The war between Russia ... and the United States ... This is such stupidity that Pindo. I won’t allow it-forgive me for my frankness ... the gut is thin Yes, and there will be a lot of other reasons I’m not a patriot, I’m not a great strategist, but ... You need to be a complete moron to contact Russia. Considerations about their technologies-utopia -Mirror
      1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 23: 30 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Bismarck: "... The war between Russia and Germany is the greatest stupidity. That is why it will happen."
        Russia is the main and perhaps the only significant obstacle for multinational banks and corporations in their activities to redraw the world. about China do not have illusions. If the methods of the “Empire of Good” for the collapse of Russia from the inside do not work, war will only be a matter of time. As soon as they decide that they are superior enough to us and the damage to the States in the event of war will be minimal, the slaughter is ensured.
        Pragmatism is American. A good Indian is a dead Indian.
        1. alexander 2 4 September 2015 23: 50 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          That is why we must have such an army that the United States believes that the damage will not be acceptable.
          1. Aljavad 5 September 2015 00: 29 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            That is why we must have such an army that the United States believes that the damage will not be acceptable.


            For this, the strategic nuclear forces will suffice. But ISIS SYS will not stop.

            The army needs a flexible one. For different occasions.
            1. alexander 2 14 September 2015 21: 33 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              It does not interfere. I cited the USA as an example only. And ISIS must understand that an attack on our country is the last independent decision.
        2. Aljavad 5 September 2015 00: 27 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          As soon as they decide that they are superior enough to us and the damage to the States in the event of war will be minimal, the slaughter is ensured.


          Even if our warheads explode in their mines, damage to the United States will become unacceptable. On Earth will come "Fallout."
          Then excel - do not exceed ...
      2. TVM - 75 5 September 2015 08: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        All the chatter from behind the hillock is the extrusion of grandmas.
    4. sovetskyturist 5 September 2015 00: 14 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      So it’s possible to wage economic, informational and similar wars, why should tanks be driven. Cold wars where aggression occurs by the method of cultural cooperation and the victim is strangled in an embrace is more effective than bayonet fighting.
  • Enot_33 4 September 2015 19: 31 New
    • 19
    • 0
    +19
    Quote: MIKHAN
    No army can compare with Russia in experience and fighting spirit! It’s in our blood ..... 145 million controls such a territory! Who else wants to test us for a little tooth?

    Do not underestimate the American warriors. ... Enemy is better to overestimate than underestimate. (As they say, it is better to be safe than crap).
    1. Reserve buildbat 4 September 2015 20: 05 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      American WHO, excuse me, do not underestimate ??? WARRIORS ??? Yes there is not a single soldier, not that of a warrior. This is a bunch of tattered jackals, capable of only attacking from the back, but as soon as they are at least a little answered, throwing in pieces.
      This is trash, not people.
      1. NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 38 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Not worth it. Americans are strong, mainly not by soldiers, but by technology. And the future war will just be the one where technology will solve everything. And in a matter of hours. But then the strength of the spirit of the soldier will come to the fore (if there is someone left with us and them). And here we will be stronger if, I repeat, those who are able to fight are alive.
        1. Reserve buildbat 4 September 2015 20: 54 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Please, give at least one sample of their equipment that matches advertising statements at least 80%
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. kot stepan 4 September 2015 21: 24 New
          • 14
          • 0
          +14
          The American army is constantly fighting. Well done. Fighting spirit ... The mentality with us is different, and therefore we understand this matter in different ways. Patton, it seems, spoke out in the spirit that there wasn’t supposedly a bigger complainer than an American soldier, but if a soldier complains, it’s normal, worse when he stops complaining ...
          Facts. Performance statistics. They simply haven’t made heroism. For example, during the 2nd World War the Germans considered the Spaniards, as they would say now, as drafters, draftsmen. The meaningless, according to the Germans, "daring well done" only harm the cause. German heroism was strictly dosed, if I may say so. The Spaniards despised the Germans for their prudence and this very dosing. In any occupied settlement, where there were both Germans and Spaniards, the female sex always preferred the Spaniards ... But, who in the end turned out to be more effective on the battlefield? That's right, the one who is better able to count and more pragmatic. But here the Germans and Americans are ahead of the rest, as they say.
          And yet. Hurray to the patriots. Of which I observe a lot here. Zadolbali puppy delights.
          If a topic is really interesting, refer to the statistics. The time of the Ardennes "blitzkrieg" of the Germans. The Americans are retreating. How many of them voluntarily (I emphasize - voluntarily!) Surrendered to the Germans? For the same period of time, the Eastern Front.
          The Red Army is advancing. How many Red Army men voluntarily (once again, for the "gifted" - voluntarily!) Go over to the Germans?
          Well, for a snack. Compare the battles for Grozny (94-95gg) and the battles for Fallujah (2004), the battles for Hue (1968). When politicians stopped interfering with the army (the last two cases), it showed itself perfectly.
          1. hunt 4 September 2015 21: 33 New
            • -3
            • 0
            -3
            And you yourself, participated in the battles for Grozny? What would you compare?
            1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 22: 15 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              Uncle, learn to engage in dialogue. But in the battles for Carthage, the same thing you need to participate in order to describe the mode of action of the Roman army ?! Do not make you think of you as a collective farmer, for whom your favorite arguments are: "Have you been there?" or "did you see it?"
              1. hunt 4 September 2015 22: 47 New
                • -1
                • 0
                -1
                For uncle, thanks. Soon grandfather :)
          2. hunt 4 September 2015 21: 44 New
            • 8
            • 0
            +8
            Well, for an appetizer, in the Ardennes, the American army went to the exhausted Wehrmacht parts, which snapped, having suffered huge losses, there was no one to surrender, they picked the Fritz out of the fortification line, and before that the Fritz drove them through the forests and the Americans suffered very heavy losses. There were no concentration camps and such a large-scale attack as on the USSR. So the comparison is inappropriate, the first day of the war and almost the last.
            1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 22: 22 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              It’s appropriate. With the story you are not very like that. Before writing about the Arden events, at least briefly familiarize yourself with the material. And what I asked to compare was for people interested in the topic. And, attention (!), Asked to compare the events that occurred in the same time period on different fronts!
            2. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 4 September 2015 22: 39 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Please note that the Americans in the camps received parcels through the Red Cross, and our guys in the concentration camps were starving!
          3. Weyland 5 September 2015 12: 28 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: kot stepan
            But who in the end turned out to be more effective on the battlefield?


            Probably the one who survived (and survived his ally for 30 years - this is me about Franco) wink
          4. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: kot stepan
            How many of them voluntarily (I emphasize - voluntarily!) Surrendered to the Germans?

            The Americans, although unimportant fighters, but if they lose, they honestly die, and do not give up, not having exhausted all the possibilities for resistance, like Europeans or Japanese.
        3. Andrew 5 September 2015 07: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          True, and the fact that we are less "digitized" will be our huge advantage ...
      2. igor.borov775 4 September 2015 21: 03 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Oh well . The American army fights well not in sports. But methods Yes. The opponent for her is still weak. But remember, until the Yankees destroy it remotely, the Yankees will not move. And another moment, while they have the absolute superiority of the enemy’s remote suppression. Our Current Army has embarked on such a method of combat. a very strong army should not be afraid, but it is worth learning the experience of military operations. Underestimating the likely enemy always leads to dire consequences for the army and, most importantly, for the population. You can’t be treated like some draw here.
        1. Ross_ulair 4 September 2015 22: 59 New
          • 10
          • 0
          +10
          Quote: igor.borov775
          Oh well . The American army fights well not in sports. But methods Yes. The opponent for her is still weak. But remember, until the Yankees destroy it remotely, the Yankees will not move. And another moment, while they have the absolute superiority of the enemy’s remote suppression. Our Current Army has embarked on such a method of combat. a very strong army should not be afraid, but it is worth learning the experience of military operations. Underestimating the likely enemy always leads to dire consequences for the army and, most importantly, for the population. You can’t be treated like some draw here.


          The US Army has in recent years very, very weakened. If we compare the current combat readiness army and thirty years ago, the latter goes ahead by a large margin. And the explanation is very simple, like boots - fighting with a weaker opponent, the army weakens itself.
          30 years ago, the American army was preparing for a confrontation with the then-strongest army of the Land of Soviets. The level of training was appropriate. Now the USA army is fighting with yesterday's camel drivers, and other spirits that can do the most - to blow up a landmine on the road or blow themselves up at a roadblock.
          The pilots turned into cabbies - everything, even fighters - whose main task is to deliver the bomb cargo to the drop point and press the button.
          Tanks turned into clumsy fortresses on wheels weighing under 70 tons, the main task of which is to support the actions of infantry and marines, provided that they are not defeated by manual anti-tank weapons. From a means of breaking through to operational space and operations on communications, tanks turned into artillery supporting infantry at a direct-fire range.
          Light armored vehicles turned into heavy, which is able to withstand a blast in a land mine, where mobility is sacrificed to the defense.
          This is because over the past 15 years the army has been fulfilling precisely the specific tasks of acting against lightly armed partisan units.

          But! It is foolish and criminal to consider an army of a likely adversary weak, snickering, shy and unsuitable for anything. It is no less stupid and criminal to glorify the virtues of one's own army to heaven, while likening oneself to an ostrich at the words of its shortcomings and weaknesses. Thank! We have already passed this! Before each world war, we go through this stage - we are not preparing for future wars, but for the past, after which we leave for mass heroism and huge blood.
          The United States Army is strong, and it is strong not only in technology - the morale of the guys who serve in it must also be taken into account. one who believes in layoffs on Donald Cook after flying our Dry. and the criminal.

          IMHO - war is work. High risk jobs. But, like in any job, if all the links - from the supreme to the rank and file Vanya, will clearly do their job - the losses will be minimal. And heroism is not required in this case. Any heroism is first of all a consequence of the mistakes of higher commanders.
          We do not need heroism - we need pragmatists to the marrow of bones, and we will win the exact calculation.
          1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 23: 39 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            No, well, finally, the Voice of Reason. A little categorically ... But that's right.
          2. dali 7 September 2015 14: 01 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: ROSS_Ulair
            We do not need heroism - we need pragmatists to the marrow of bones, and we will win the exact calculation.


            You are a brother from the fire and into the fire ... have not forgotten such a Russian proverb ?! belay

            Quote: ROSS_Ulair
            one who believes in layoffs on Donald Cook after flying our Dry. and the criminal.
            Where did the woods come from ... from the State Department ... laughing
            Evidence that this is a lie in the studio !!!
            1. Ross_ulair 7 September 2015 14: 41 New
              • -1
              • 0
              -1
              Quote: Dali


              Sense to me to prove something to you ?! I can ask for the opposite - prove that there were layoffs! Only without reference to the yellow press.

              My simple message is that it’s better to overtake than not to finish. It’s better to overestimate the enemy than to underestimate.
              If the Americans are now trumpeting everywhere about how weak they are - and there’s no fighting spirit, and nuclear forces are in decline, and without sorting, it’s nowhere, the soldier will call the lawyer right away - I would think. It’s not according to the treatise of the great Chinese that they act: "If you are weak - show strength, if strong - show weakness." So far, all in one turns out.

              It’s better not to consider any army weak, no soldiers cowardly and no generals fools. Less blood will be shed if it happens ...
              And there are always plenty of people like you - hat-captors - in Mother Russia. The Japanese 110 years ago apparently threw the same way, according to your method
              1. dali 7 September 2015 17: 00 New
                • -1
                • 0
                -1
                Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                It’s better not to consider any army weak, no soldiers cowardly and no generals fools. Less blood will be shed if it happens ...
                And who is against it, but it's too bad to go too far - you know what a sense of proportion is?
                Therefore, your desire for pure pragmatists is a bust ...
                Because from the fire to the fire - just about you ...

                Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                And there are always plenty of people like you - hat-captors - in Mother Russia. The Japanese 110 years ago apparently threw the same way, according to your method
                You are for yourself to answer ... and do not ascribe to others what you thought. Where did you read from me that the mattress army is weak and we need to rest on our laurels ?! belay

                Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                Sense to me to prove something to you ?! I can ask for the opposite - prove that there were layoffs! Only without reference to the yellow press.
                By the way, the mattresses have Colonel Warren, however, even he does not deny this incident, unless details are described:

                The US Department of Defense believes that the actions of the Russian Su-24 military aircraft, which flew at a low altitude of the American destroyer Donald Cook in the Black Sea, were provocative. This was announced on Monday by Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren, who clarified that the Russian plane went 12 times near the US Navy ship.

                “These provocative and unprofessional actions of Russia do not comply with its national rules and previous agreements on professional interaction between the armed forces of our countries.

                Yes ... DT channels is the yellow press, what do you think?

                Well, another question, what, after a simple flyby of unarmed drying, so briskly retreated to the Romanian port of Constanta ?! belay laughing
                1. Ross_ulair 8 September 2015 09: 57 New
                  • -1
                  • 0
                  -1
                  Quote: Dali
                  And who is against it, but it's too bad to go too far - you know what a sense of proportion is?
                  Therefore, your desire for pure pragmatists is a bust ...
                  Because from the fire to the fire - just about you ...

                  You are for yourself to answer ... and do not ascribe to others what you thought. Where did you read from me that the mattress army is weak and we need to rest on our laurels ?! belay


                  First, you show me where I extolled the Amer army to heaven, and then ascribe your speculations. The debate was about the complete and unconditional superiority of us over the Americans, who, without assortment, cannot fight. From my point of view, this is criminal. As well as defeatism.

                  About pragmatism - but what's wrong with that? Clear planning of all stages and precise implementation of the orders of the headquarters at all levels ensures the achievement of goals with minimal losses. This Crimea last year showed when everything worked clearly, like a clockwork. Another thing is that in the conditions of real hostilities this is utopia, well, so I did not say the opposite. I affirm only that the heroism of some is due to the stupidity and negligence of others. This is an axiom.
                  You read the Charter at your leisure - this is where pragmatists dragged on laughing Only now all the pages are written in blood ...

                  It’s another matter that heroism not only has a place for us - for the same amers in Iraq and Afghanistan, some lay on grenades to cover others. This is to the question below

                  Quote: Dali
                  By the way, the mattresses have Colonel Warren, however, even he does not deny this incident, unless details are described:

                  .

                  Yes ... DT channels is the yellow press, what do you think?


                  Anyone can talk and any number. Do you yourself believe that military specialists, the preparation of which took several years, after many years of service, will begin to quit after the flight of the aircraft? I do not believe. No need to consider the probable enemy cowards and idiots.

                  Quote: Dali
                  Well, another question, what, after a simple flyby of unarmed drying, so briskly retreated to the Romanian port of Constanta ?! belay laughing


                  I think not the unarmed drying affected, but the statement of Russia and the demonstrative deployment of anti-ship systems on the Crimean coast.
                  1. dali 9 September 2015 20: 41 New
                    • -1
                    • 0
                    -1
                    Quote: ROSS_Ulair
                    I think not the unarmed drying affected, but the statement of Russia and the demonstrative deployment of anti-ship systems on the Crimean coast.


                    You can’t install anti-ship complexes on the coast in one day ...
                    And then they did not know what they were already standing ... or did you change your mind and consider mattresses to be complete idiots ?! belay laughing
                  2. dali 11 September 2015 22: 28 New
                    • -1
                    • 0
                    -1
                    And this minus, all that you could answer ?! laughing
                  3. Ross_ulair 11 September 2015 23: 47 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: Dali
                    And this minus, all that you could answer ?! laughing


                    Dear, in your post I did not notice a question - one casuistry. Therefore, a well-deserved minus was put to you.

                    If you want to continue the dialogue, please, first answer me this question
                    First, you show me where I extolled the Amer army to heaven, and then ascribe your speculations.


                    If you do not answer - you, dear, idiot and talker

                    All the best
      3. The comment was deleted.
  • aviator65 4 September 2015 21: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The trouble is that this bunch of tattered jackals that can only attack from the backattacking from the back can do a lot of troubles. Please note that they prefer to fight remotely. Again, they were answered a little in both Iraq and Yugoslavia, but they didn’t rush very loose. This means that they will have to rush to answer not just a little bit, but with the full power of their potential. It's me that no adversary should be underestimated. Unfortunately, we have considerable historical experience in this. Our soldiers had to shed a lot of blood for these lessons.
  • Das Boot 4 September 2015 21: 21 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Quote: stock buildbat
    Sorry, do not underestimate the American WHO ??? ... This is a bunch of tattered jackals ... as soon as they get at least a little answer, they throw themselves in all directions.

    familiar intonations. Caps of adversaries already, having happened, threw. If you, dear, about your colleagues from the American construction battalion, then perhaps you know better -
    Quote: stock buildbat
    in bulk.
    or stacks. There is one more generously added cavalryman who loves patriotic gallops. Here you are a couple with MIHANOM all enemies at once ...
    1. Reserve buildbat 4 September 2015 21: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Very funny, thanks. And now give an example of at least one confrontation of the strip army with a more or less close (in the generation of technology) enemy to them and combat-ready soldiers in an amount at least equal to their "expeditionary forces." Stripes are terribly afraid of fire resistance, which they themselves admit. With a loss percentage of more than 2%, they are fleeing. This is their own data. Then you can think hi
      1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 22: 36 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Hue. Close combat. Nobody ran anywhere. Wounded marines who could hold weapons in their hands did not leave positions.
        Fights for Guadalcanal, for Iwo Jima ... To list further? What 2% there?
      2. aviator65 4 September 2015 22: 46 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: stock buildbat
        With a loss percentage of more than 2%, they are fleeing. This is their own data.

        This is where they fled for the past 30 years? Operate hackneyed stamps?
        Quote: stock buildbat
        Now give an example of at least one confrontation of the strip army with a more or less close (in the generation of technology) enemy and combat-ready soldiers in an amount at least equal to their "expeditionary forces"

        That is, following the above definition, only our armed forces can be such an adversary, if I understand correctly? And now, for a second, forget about our nuclear capabilities and try to imagine how much we will have in a large-scale military conflict without using them, given the banal quantitative ratio in conventional modern weapons. Personally, I’m more than sure that not only will nobody give us time for so-called "threatened period" so that we could have time to get a more or less complete combat readiness by the beginning of the clash, but they will crush us with all available means, regardless of anything, because here the question will be about our destruction as a civilization. Nothing else in this conflict, God forbid, of course, amers will no longer be interested. And with all the strength of the spirit of our people, with all its courage, I assure you, oh, and we will take bread again ...
        As for the availability of “Topol”, “Yars" and even "Satan", then to use this power, the IRON political will of the leadership of the country and the armed forces is required. Notice those, not one specific person at the helm, but the entire leadership! Can we count on this now? Personally, doubts overcome me.
        1. Reserve buildbat 5 September 2015 09: 17 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Over the past 30 years, they have not fled from nowhere. They died on the spot)) If anything, listen to the same mattresses talking about the war in the Donbass. They note that their army is incapable of conducting hostilities with an enemy who has something more serious than small arms and improvised armored cars. So this is not an army
          1. aviator65 5 September 2015 19: 16 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Did you hear that from them? Oh well...
  • Andrew 5 September 2015 07: 56 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In vain you are so ...
  • Iskander-Khan 4 September 2015 21: 26 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Amer. can not be considered warriors-WARRIOR SOLDIERS = these are the peoples of RUSSIA MATOSH who defended their fatherland and came to the Lair of the enemy and defeated him Amer-Hammer Pampers stake ... I do not see a joke here And about crap-Water Closet -ser ..
  • Vladimir Pozlnyakov 4 September 2015 22: 35 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    I especially imagine the spirit of NIGER, God forbid this happens, among the snowdrifts !!!
    1. Bekas1967 5 September 2015 08: 55 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      You can have no doubt for the spirituality of “Niger”, watch sports on TV, in particular martial arts. And you have to fight with the Whites, very white, like the Aryans. The Negroes did not pose a threat to the Slavs NEVER ... and if you want racism, look for other resources, right now a lot of them divorced, there you have a place (((
  • Andrew 5 September 2015 07: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Everything is so, and in no way contradicts the statement of MIKHAN ...
  • KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 25 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Enot_33
    Do not underestimate the American warriors. ... Enemy is better to overestimate than underestimate. (As they say, it is better to be safe than crap).

    I want to add - we are judging by the US Army by the modern army of guest workers, but in the case of a "big batch" completely different people will become in service, with fighting efficiency a cut above.
    1. dali 11 September 2015 22: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: KaPToC
      I want to add - we are judging by the US Army by the modern army of guest workers, but in the case of a "big batch" completely different people will become in service, with fighting efficiency a cut above.


      So you want to say that the majority of Americans are better warriors than Germans in World War II ?!
  • Finches 4 September 2015 20: 00 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    As this rather famous phrase sounded there:"Who else wants a commissar body?" laughing
    1. jjj
      jjj 4 September 2015 20: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Finches
      What did this rather famous phrase sound like: "Who else wants a commissar body here?"

      This is the response replica to the phrase:
      - Under the fragrant branch of lilac I will kiss you harder.
      Yes, everything is optimistic
  • Tanais 4 September 2015 20: 28 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Bullshit all these ratings! No army can compare with Russia in experience and fighting spirit!

    So this is a point-factor, and was not taken into account.
    Therefore, everything should look different.

    And how not to mention "APU APU"... If you consider their" fighting bunch ", then their place is just for Estonia ...
  • Lelek 4 September 2015 20: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    [quote = MIHAN] Bullshit all these ratings!

    Totally in favor. All these ratings are bullshit and horror stories for the faint of heart. bully
  • PQ-18 4 September 2015 20: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    145 million control this territory!

    Danes ... Greenland "control", and NOTHING!
    (and them in it are NOT "thicker than our brother beyond the Urals") wink
    1. asiat_61 5 September 2015 01: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Who needs Greenland?
      1. Tanais 5 September 2015 08: 48 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: asiat_61
        Who needs Greenland?

        What do you have per kilogram?
    2. Andrew 5 September 2015 08: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The Danes "control", and we CONTROL! ...
  • Sergej1972 4 September 2015 21: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So Canadians are cooler than us? They are four times smaller than us, and the territory is less than half.)) Or Kazakhs and Mongols.))
  • Sergey S. 4 September 2015 21: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Bullshit all these ratings!

    It seems that they do not know how to count.

    How to bring tanks and aircraft carriers to a common denominator? The answer to this question is known only to the patient at home for the wretched.
  • Asadullah 4 September 2015 22: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    No army can compare with Russia in experience and fighting spirit!


    From my own experience I can say that the best fighters are Vietnamese, then Cubans. Russia is in third place. As for the assault attacks, I can’t imagine the Americans’s DRG. Well, no way. Any shot from behind the blow, they begin to iron palladins in the village for two hours. Pull out the two hundredth, the whole operation goes through, and the “pencils” are given instructions on the mobile how to crawl out into the non-fired zone. I don’t really understand what the marines are, they either guard the camps, or scramble through the abandoned villages, something shmonaya. Once I saw a video where Marina was shooting with something, but the battle distance was from two kilometers. Why they fired with courageous faces did not understand, or maybe they shot a movie. In conversations with the Americans, I realized that they did not at all represent the possibility of being killed by a war. As if pioneers in Zarnitsa. Interestingly, the Anglo-Saxons until the mid-twentieth century were good fighters. and in the 19th, they generally taught the whole world to fight. Half a hundred years and complete degradation. What is it? The McDonald's phenomenon?
    1. AlexSK 5 September 2015 03: 19 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Is Russia on the third? C'mon, of course, I do not beg the merits of the Vietnamese and Cubans, but did the soldiers of the country, which participated in the persistent world wars and won, have brilliant military leaders in them to put on their third place? This is not serious.
      1. kot stepan 5 September 2015 07: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Probably, Asadullah means the experience of these comrades in counter-partisan and partisan actions, their preparation at a tactical and operational-tactical level. In this context (!) His assessment is fair, probably.
    2. kot stepan 5 September 2015 07: 39 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      What you write about takes place. Every army has a mess. However ... Let's not confuse soft with warm.
      “... I can’t imagine the American LNG.” There is no need to imagine anything. A little different concept, but there is the same. This matter is very well organized for them. It will probably not be news for you that both the British and the Americans, when training in close combat, solved the problem of sheep, shepherd dogs, wolves, etc., putting all this into the training methodology. each shooter (!). The first characteristic example is the complete superiority of the British in the effectiveness of the use of small arms in the ground phase of the battles for the Falklands in 1982. The same is true for Americans after the introduction of new techniques (after Vietnam). Yes, they try to avoid "close combat" (and why?!), But if such a thing happens, then under equal conditions, as a rule, they are orders of magnitude (yes, orders of magnitude) More effective than their opponents. This is also understood in our Defense Ministry. But, they also understand that such training methods would reasonably be used in a fully contracted army. Therefore, in order to at least somehow compensate for this matter, they began to saturate the army with machine guns.
      But, okay, small arms. The outcome of the battle, as a rule, is determined by heavy (collective) weapons. In Ukraine now, as in the First World War - 70% of losses are artillery fire. What do we have with artillery? That's right - ass. We stopped at the level of the end of the 80s. When they did not create a network of “artillery” satellites, dismantled the APPK equipment, liquidated the department (the only one in the country!) AIR, we did not really teach how to use high-precision ammunition (the stores were full of Krasnopol). Who could really use it for the first Chechen one? ! How expensive it is to train). And what has been done over the past 25 years ?! Oh yes. In the eastern part of Ukraine, a new trend is shooting training and shooting itself using smartphones as the main tool. Here you and topographic adjustment and adjustment and complete preparation ... It works great. And the battalion commander at the NP in this world is somehow not relevant anymore ... Now look what the Americans, Germans, Swedes and other French have. I don’t want to describe everything. If it’s interesting, there is enough material in the public domain. The backlog is conceptual in nature - an increase in the number of trunks here will not equal opportunities.
      To write about debugged interaction with aviation? I only mention that the Cheburashka began to be converted into shock drones with the ability to carry tactical nuclear weapons.
      About the evacuation of the wounded from the battlefield. Yes, whole operations. Yes, a separate service. Everything to meet the "golden hour". Will we compare the capabilities of the medical service and hospitals of various categories? I have a district hospital near me. Looks like in a sense. Some old people are still there. The head of the hospital shrugs. Well, I can’t say that I pay such money to staff, as in Med. Institute. In the chambers there is only talk of how many "sheathed".
      In general, gloomy comparisons are obtained. We can inflict unacceptable damage on the enemy, of course. The issue of price.
      1. Asadullah 5 September 2015 17: 32 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The issue of price.


        Apart from the little things, you have nothing to object to, but the question is completely not that. The question is that they are not taught to fight, they are taught to beat. They cope with a weak adversary very successfully. But in case of resistance, all debugging disappears. Moreover, I met different Americans, and I’m sure that defending his native Ohio, the nature of the battle would be completely different, worthy. The matter of motivation, even experienced geese, do not hesitate to send their command to the same organ on the air, because they earn money, and do not sacrifice their guts to local flies. There are no heroes there, they are fools, but they are quickly shot. By the way, the specialists have excellent shooting training there, I don’t advise getting into fuchsia with an aiming sight. And the price, is it the price of human life? There is a fever of battle, and how cool you are, how prudent, how trained, you and your comrades, fighting luck will love you so much.
        1. kot stepan 5 September 2015 18: 19 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          “The point is motivation ...” I agree with the clarification. (“Heroes of Kelly” has a good episode with an American tanker on this subject).
    3. Bekas1967 5 September 2015 09: 04 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      My thoughts! Fighting remotely and in the forehead, are different things. It’s one thing to press a button and steer the joystick, -other, to crawl in the trenches under the hail ... Vietnam comes first in spirituality! Serious fighters.
  • 222222 4 September 2015 22: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The portal Global Firepower has published another rating of the armies of the states of the world. "
    another PR .. sci-fi ..
    there is military potential and military-economic potential
    ... "" MILITARY POTENTIAL OF THE STATE - a set of involved and potential material and spiritual capabilities of the state, which can be used for military purposes with the maximum and timely disclosure and use of them. It is determined by the capabilities of the state (coalition of states) to maintain and improve the armed forces, increase their combat effectiveness, replenish trained personnel, supply modern weapons and military equipment, all types of allowances in peacetime and wartime, ensure the achievement of the goals of the war.

    Indicators of the military potential of the state are:

    military-scientific and military-economic capabilities of the state;
    the ability of the nation and state to maintain and improve the armed forces of the appropriate composition, to increase their combat effectiveness and combat readiness, to replenish trained personnel, to supply modern weapons and military equipment, all types of allowances in peacetime and wartime;
    the quality and quantity of arms and military equipment, the ability of the state to increase their production, the mobilization capabilities of the country and the armed forces, their ability to quickly deploy to the maximum composition;
    the level of combat, operational and mobilization readiness of the Armed Forces, the degree of mobilization preparation of the state economy, the availability of stocks of strategic raw materials, production reserves, and other material assets;
    moral-psychological, general educational, military and military-technical training of personnel of the Armed Forces and senior leadership of the state and the armed forces;
    moral and psychological state of the people and the level of military training of the population;
    the level of development of military theory and its compliance with military practice.
    ""
  • benefactor21 4 September 2015 22: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It’s not the ratings that decide on the battlefield, no matter how multi-factorial they are, but the specific circumstances of the next “world” and still the motivation of the warrior, and she (motivation) is always higher if on the side of the truth (“our cause is right”). And what the American inspire (by the way, this is a collective white gentleman, a former slave - an African American, a diverse hook, a red-skinned survivor) from childhood the American dream - the idea of ​​success using any methods, instead of the idea of ​​defending the Homeland (after all, they never defended their Homeland on their territory - Pearl Harbor does not count).
  • NEXUS 4 September 2015 23: 32 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: MIKHAN
    .145 million controls such territory! Who else wants to test us for a little tooth?

    I can answer all this with one digit -FOR 1000 YEARS WE Fought 650 YEARS!Who else in the world can compare with such a genetic heritage of WINNERS ?!
  • Aljavad 4 September 2015 23: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Bullshit all these ratings!


    I fully agree.
  • burmundia 5 September 2015 01: 17 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    have you bye tabe lope years?
  • TVM - 75 5 September 2015 08: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Of course all bullshit! All these ratings have specific goals that do not correspond to reality. It is necessary to put pressure on the psyche of peoples and governments (someone with a plus, someone with a minus), you need to knock out money. Other results are not seen in them.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • anokem 5 September 2015 09: 17 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It is not clear why we are in 11th place and lower than South Korea, Turkey, Germany and Japan. We surpass these countries in terms of weapons composition, military experience and fighting spirit.
    1. Weyland 5 September 2015 12: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I suspect that military experience and morale were simply not taken into account - how do you calculate them? wink -
      Otherwise, the United States would not have taken 1st place in the ranking laughing
    2. Weyland 5 September 2015 12: 30 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I suspect that military experience and morale were simply not taken into account - how do you calculate them? wink -
      Otherwise, the United States would not have taken 1st place in the ranking laughing
    3. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: anokem
      It is unclear why we are in 11th place and lower than South Korea, Turkey, Germany and Japan.

      God is on the side of large battalions.
  • Petr1 5 September 2015 10: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Firstly, it’s not the army but the people, this people got up when it was hard and defeated everyone, and secondly, if any people rise, they can only be defeated by complete extermination.
  • bobby 5 September 2015 10: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    5 times fewer Canadians control the territory half as much as Russia.
    1. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: bobby
      5 times fewer Canadians control the territory half as much as Russia.

      And how many “Canadians” live in the USA? They just have a place to go.
    2. Scraptor 30 September 2015 18: 15 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      and how many Canadians border China (and NATO)?
      greenland in this worn is generally a wonderful country wassat
  • Lenin 6 September 2015 23: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Another Western "analytical" agency that issues ratings and forecasts for US dollars. The more dollars, the better and more independent the forecast or rating.
  • ALEA IACTA EST 4 September 2015 19: 17 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Quote: Dr. Bormental
    0.1865 + 0.2315

    The terrible dream of the inhabitant of the White House. laughing
    1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 32 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      I read in one translated article that mattresses are most afraid of uniting us with the Germans (in terms of friendly relations, military relations) because they believe that these are the two strongest armies in Europe. Accordingly, the Germans will stretch all the rest of Europe. Then why are the Germans in 8th place?
      1. Alex1313 4 September 2015 19: 47 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        their numbers are not large
      2. Rarog 4 September 2015 20: 04 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        The first six officially have a bomb (this is a significant contribution to the assessment), but South Korea has been at war with its soulmate for half a century, something like - "always ready!" And do not forget, all these ratings are very subjective.
        1. sanja.grw 4 September 2015 20: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The first six officially have a nuclear bomb (this is a significant contribution to the assessment)

          But what about Israel, they also have, all these ratings are full of bullshit. What about the army, what about the economy. There Americans everywhere in 1 place
          1. Rarog 4 September 2015 20: 53 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: sanja.grw

            But what about Israel, they also have, all these ratings are full of bullshit. What about the army, what about the economy. There Americans everywhere in 1 place


            The word "Officially" in my post is not just written, but about the subjectivity of ratings, too. wink The presence of nuclear weapons in Israel has not been officially confirmed by anyone, but the DPRK and Pakistan of. there is a status, but the place in the rating is not very, and again a reference to the last sentence of my first post.
          2. KaPToC 6 September 2015 11: 40 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: sanja.grw
            But what about Israel, they also have

            Officially, no
      3. sanja.grw 4 September 2015 20: 15 New
        • 27
        • 0
        +27
        And samurai at 9
        1. Cat man null 4 September 2015 20: 33 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Well, "repaired" - it is said loudly .. "hyped" soon.

          Funny video thanks yes
        2. dr.star75 4 September 2015 20: 38 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And if the introduction: the work of Russian TCP?
        3. Truth 4 September 2015 20: 55 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: sanja.grw
          And samurai at 9

          The video looked with the hope that they will succeed ...
          Well, to them the Kuril Islands, they already have enough entertainment ...
          They pinned hammers with which they tried to bale something there ...
          Well, just like children in a sandbox.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. your1970 4 September 2015 21: 47 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          particularly impressed with the number of "price indicators" ....
          One-man 8 was hammering with a hammer ..
          they wore it for at least 25-30 minutes, what kind of opposition is there, in reality fighting - just an abandoned tank would be
          1. Srgsoap 5 September 2015 09: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            This is normal for the Japs)))))) I happened to visit Tokyo, so I want to say that the proverb "Two plow, seven wave their hands" is about them. Personally seen road works. Two with jackpots picking asphalt, four around the car are driven away in reflective arm ruffles and a fifth general guide for both of them)))))
        6. pv1005 4 September 2015 21: 58 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Summer, on a flat ground, lack of rainfall and enemy fire, a bunch of "specialists", Japanese ARVs, and could not change the goose’s goose? request This must be able to. Rare D.E.B.I.L. fool
          1. your1970 6 September 2015 15: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            BREM is, as it were, in theory, specialists in shoes / repair / evacuation ...

            ZY in science, they had to drag him from behind, to their rear - and not to the enemy lol
      4. APASUS 4 September 2015 20: 36 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        Then why are the Germans in 8th place?

        There are generally a lot of questions.
        How did the Swedes get close to Ukraine or what is the army of Vietnam inferior to the Poles in .............
        1. Tanais 4 September 2015 22: 40 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: APASUS

          There are generally a lot of questions.
          How did the Swedes get close to Ukraine or what is the army of Vietnam inferior to the Poles in .............

          And who is stronger, KIT or ELEPHANT?
          1. APASUS 5 September 2015 09: 10 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Tanais
            And who is stronger, KIT or ELEPHANT?

            Too primitive
            1. Tanais 5 September 2015 10: 51 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: APASUS
              Too primitive

              Maybe. But the techniques used to create this rating do not shine ...

              Therefore, an example, UNDER BECOME.
      5. Aleksandr1959 4 September 2015 20: 39 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I read in one translated article that mattresses are most afraid of uniting us with the Germans (in terms of friendly relations, military relations) because they believe that these are the two strongest armies in Europe. Accordingly, the Germans will stretch all the rest of Europe. Then why are the Germans in 8th place?
        That you just noticed

        But. not only in the army. The combination of Russian resources, not only mineral resources, but also skilled labor, developments with German technologies ... will give a very powerful alliance.
        And the army of the GDR was considered one of the strongest in the Warsaw Treaty Organization. Such an alliance was for the impudent Saxons an eternal headache. Therefore, there was a constant incitement of Germany to Russia, and then to the USSR.
        1. KaPToC 6 September 2015 19: 36 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Aleksandr1959
          But. not only in the army. The combination of Russian resources, not only mineral resources, but also skilled labor, developments with German technologies ... will give a very powerful alliance.

          Such a visit, the only option that Europe accepts, is Moscow subordinate to Brussels. And preferably not Moscow, but in parts: Moscow, St. Petersburg, Rostov, Volgograd, Novosibirsk.
          In itig, the demographically most developed countries will become centers of power on the planet.
      6. NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 39 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        My strongest dream is the Union of Germany and Russia. Both economic and military.
        1. kot stepan 4 September 2015 22: 40 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/?skip=10
          It looks like Germany is stuck specifically. That Hitler, then multiculturalism. Not lucky uncharacteristically.
      7. Sergej1972 4 September 2015 21: 08 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        In my opinion, now no one in the FRG itself, or beyond, considers the Bundeswehr the strongest army in Europe.
      8. Sergej1972 4 September 2015 21: 12 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        No nuclear weapons, the ocean fleet, nuclear submarines. There is no strategic, and front-line bomber aviation. No long-range missiles. Basically, the modern Bundeswehr is imprisoned for defense.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • shooter18 4 September 2015 19: 29 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    And so, in fact, do not underestimate the enemy! the United States has an economic, technological and resource base that is much higher than ours (if I may say so), taking their allies and vassals into account, they keep the whole planet on a leash, of course, except for some territories)) but if you take Russia in alliance with China ... against the United States in alliance with Canada and the United Kingdom, that would be interesting to see)))
    1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 36 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      I do not want to look at it, I want to die with my death, and not from radiation sickness, after the atomic bombing in the bunker))))
      1. kotvov 4 September 2015 19: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        and not from radiation sickness, after the atomic bombing in the bunker)))) ,,
        Doctor, do not worry. As they say: what is written in the family.
        but I categorically disagree with the rating, as if the ukrovermaht shoved something, it’s not in the first three. Apparently the woman will have to complain. laughing
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Vadim237 4 September 2015 20: 36 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        In the bunker you will definitely not get radiation sickness.
        1. marlin1203 4 September 2015 20: 44 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          This hypothetical measure by the genitals has already gotten. Digital analysis, etc. If it’s easier, then almost anyone has a chance in a fight. The Germans in the 41st were also technologically superior to us in a number of other indicators, and why? But you don’t have to boast, otherwise you can grab the lyuley at once in the heat of imaginary superiority.
      4. NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Like a doctor! Better to die healthy after 95 years somewhere. I don’t want in the bunker.
    2. kot stepan 4 September 2015 21: 30 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It's like that. If the blitzkrieg fails, the war of attrition begins. The one with the most resources wins. Axiom.
      1. Maks-80 4 September 2015 22: 57 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They still help us: General Frost, lack of roads and autumn - spring thaw :)
  • gozmosZh 4 September 2015 21: 13 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    (0.1865 + 0.2315) / 2 = 0.2090
  • Vasek 4 September 2015 21: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    An interesting rating is South Korea in 7th place, and North Korea, where 70% of the male population are military personnel, as if it does not exist in nature. request
    What are these southerners, if they are so combat-ready, will not force the northerners to unite in any way? what
  • takto.onotak 7 September 2015 09: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right, BUT: the main mistake is to underestimate the enemy; the best war in which I did not participate; it is impossible, in spite of the alleged personal moral qualities, to deny the potential of the amers, they managed to set up bases around the world and hide behind a living European shield of satellites ...
  • takto.onotak 7 September 2015 09: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right, BUT: the main mistake is to underestimate the enemy; the best war in which I did not participate; it is impossible, in spite of the alleged personal moral qualities, to deny the potential of the amers, they managed to set up bases around the world and hide behind a living European shield of satellites ...
  • Jan Ivanov 7 September 2015 11: 06 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They are stupidly more in pieces, in billions of money, and their army is imprisoned for attack, and not for defense. Again bases around the world.
  • GRAY 4 September 2015 19: 05 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    We seem to have normal relations with the Chinese - maybe it’s time for America to dump the Lyuli?
    1. Enot_33 4 September 2015 19: 07 New
      • 14
      • 0
      +14
      what a bloodthirsty you are. Why don't you live peacefully?
      1. GRAY 4 September 2015 19: 10 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        Quote: Enot_33
        Why don't you live peacefully?

        Tired of amer, like a mosquito over the ear.
        I want to beat.
        1. Enot_33 4 September 2015 19: 14 New
          • -4
          • 0
          -4
          Quote: GRAY
          Tired of amer, like a mosquito over the ear.
          I want to beat.

          what exactly are you tired of?
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. tol100v 4 September 2015 19: 21 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: GRAY
          Tired of amer, like a mosquito over the ear.
          I want to beat.

          And then the ear will be very painful! Yes, and troublesome for a bear to crush mosquitoes!
          1. GRAY 4 September 2015 19: 47 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Tol100v
            And then the ear will be very painful! Yes, and troublesome for a bear to crush mosquitoes!

            It is necessary to drain their swamp, then they themselves will die.
        3. andj61 4 September 2015 19: 30 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: GRAY
          Tired of amer, like a mosquito over the ear.
          I want to beat.

          Vysotsky immediately recalled:
          "I need to at least kill someone .." good
        4. asar 4 September 2015 19: 38 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Sergei! Good all!
          War is the last argument!
          Or maybe something different, maybe economically (transfer payment for all in national currencies, or through busoters from Fergusson ?!
          Grind the "well-being" of the "only" and "great"!
        5. novobranets 4 September 2015 20: 09 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          Quote: GRAY
          like a mosquito over your ear.
          I want to beat.

          When a mosquito sits on your balls, it immediately comes to the understanding that it is more expensive to solve some issues with violence. yes
        6. NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 48 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Buy a ticket to the USA and act.
          1. GRAY 4 September 2015 20: 55 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: NordUral
            Buy a ticket to the USA and act.

            Negroes, Mexicans and the police act there without me.
    2. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 09 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Comrade Warrant Officer, or maybe we’re a whim?
      -Will surely crash, the whole world is in ruins !!! .... but then "(c) DMB
      1. sanja.grw 4 September 2015 19: 15 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        Comrade Warrant Officer, or maybe we’re a whim?

        1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 38 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Applause to the studio !!!
  • siberalt 4 September 2015 19: 05 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    If fences along the border were taken into account in the ranking, then Estonia could fall into a position closer to Israel. laughing
    1. ALABAY45 4 September 2015 19: 10 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      About the fences along the border, we will not ...! repeat They got into it themselves ... recourse
  • ALABAY45 4 September 2015 19: 06 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    "The Israeli army ... not in the top ten"
    Now, the Semitic colleagues will begin to analyze, frolic and blame ...! hi
    1. dr.star75 4 September 2015 19: 08 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      They will say that they considered it wrong.
      1. Astrahanec 6 September 2015 19: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        This is an argument. Nobody knows how to count Jews better. )))
    2. Altona 4 September 2015 19: 10 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: ALABAY45
      "The Israeli army ... not in the top ten"
      Now, the Semitic colleagues will begin to frolic and blame ...!

      -----------------------
      And why did the Turks bypass the IDF ... For what reasons?
      1. Boa kaa 4 September 2015 19: 51 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Altona
        And why did the Turks bypass the IDF ... For what reasons?
        Analysts did not consider Israel’s nuclear weapons because officially God's chosen non-nuclear power. Although Israel itself does not confirm, but does not deny its presence.
        And so the Israelis are noble warriors: smart, cunning, treacherous, with combat experience. Yes, and they have almost all their weapons, which can not be said about the Ottomans. yes
      2. NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 50 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        And the Kurds have not yet broken them. After that, the position of the Turks in the ranking will collapse.
        1. Vasek 4 September 2015 21: 51 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: NordUral
          And the Kurds have not yet broken them.

          They would still have our Kurds from crime to help ... bully
    3. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 14 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      In general, it is strange .. they would harm rather serious boys - military girls.
    4. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In general, it is strange .. they would harm rather serious boys - military girls.
    5. MIKHAN 4 September 2015 19: 40 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: ALABAY45
      "The Israeli army ... not in the top ten"
      Now, the Semitic colleagues will begin to analyze, frolic and blame ...! hi

      Israel has a lobby in every parliament and government of the world! And this is cooler than all tanks and fighters ..... bully So that they could be put in the first place! They know how to infiltrate and camouflage)))) Figs you will find later wassat Countrebuts torment then pay!
  • Andrey Yuryevich 4 September 2015 19: 06 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    And the weakest army among the NATO member states is the Estonian army - 108 place from 126.
    let me ... how is it? and who is 109 out of 126? what requestand sowing Korea in general below Ukraine, on the 36th ??? belay what nonsense! Ukraine has no fleet, no aviation, no ... no ... no ... winked
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. ksv1973 4 September 2015 19: 35 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Indeed, it would be interesting to see how the North Korean army butchered the Ukrainian army under a nut. But I’m afraid that the “Juche children” would not have understood that these were not regular exercises and that the enemy was not conditional. laughing
    3. tol100v 4 September 2015 19: 38 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      what nonsense! Ukraine has no fleet, no aviation, no ... no ... no ..

      But there are slingshots and rogues! Inflatable auto-tractor cameras and kites! After all, this is an invincible force. In vain they did not put them in the first place!
    4. Rader 4 September 2015 20: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      And the weakest army among the NATO member states is the Estonian army - 108 place from 126.
      let me ... how is it? and who is 109 out of 126? what requestand sowing Korea in general below Ukraine, on the 36th ??? belay what nonsense! Ukraine has no fleet, no aviation, no ... no ... no ... winked

      Andrey Yuryevich, the main rule when reading such ratings is: "laugh with this bullshit"
      In fact, the methods used in compiling such ratings remain a mystery not only for us, ordinary people, but also for the compilers of these ratings wassat laughing
    5. Altona 4 September 2015 20: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      Ukraine nor the fleet, nor aviation, nor .. not .. no ..

      --------------------
      Choyta? Do turntables have a Diamond airplane, such little cessna like Cessna? A very moscovy raft in Odessa with the “Saga Dachny” led and the mother-ship submarine Zaporizhzhia in tow, Americans or Canadians drove five rubber bands. Voshchim sea and air components are present ... laughing
  • fvandaku 4 September 2015 19: 07 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    All these ratings, to put it mildly on paper. soldier
    In real life, everything is different.
    1. ksv1973 4 September 2015 19: 41 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: fvandaku
      All these ratings, to put it mildly on paper. soldier
      In real life, everything is different.

      It's like a music hit parade. On each radio station or on each television channel he is his own, unlike the others.
      1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 52 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Well yes .. Eurovision type - a bearded woman - the leader of the hit parades)))
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • UVB
    UVB 4 September 2015 19: 07 New
    • 11
    • 0
    +11
    Where is North Korea? I do not think that the APU is superior to the DPRK army.
  • iliitchitch 4 September 2015 19: 07 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    South Korea is higher than Israel. The rating of this rating is nonsense.
    1. kil 31 4 September 2015 19: 20 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: iliitch
      South Korea is higher than Israel. The rating of this rating is nonsense.

      I agree. The rating reportedly takes into account the nuclear potentials of states, Why didn’t we take into account the nuclear weapons of the children of Moses. Where is the DPRK.
      1. Rader 4 September 2015 20: 31 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I agree. The rating, it is reported, takes into account the nuclear potentials of states, why they did not take into account the nuclear weapons of the children of Moses. Where is the DPRK.

        Because the children of Moses do not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons wink
        Well, in general, it is clear that the rating, like all similar ones, was written for the sake of writings by scribes and does not carry a semantic load
  • ekebastus 4 September 2015 19: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Bullshit .... When was the last time the United States launched its ballistic missiles ???
    1. Boa kaa 4 September 2015 19: 58 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: ekebastus
      Bullshit .... When was the last time the United States launched its ballistic missiles ???

      Dear, do not be fooled into this matter yourself and do not mislead the rest:
      On March 27, 2015 at 03:53 local time (10:53 UTC, 13:53 UHF), the Minuteman III ICBM was launched from the Vandenberg Air Force Base with a test head, which reached a specified area of ​​the Pacific Ocean near Guam approximately 40 minutes after starting.
      The launch conducted the 576th flight test squadron with the participation of the 341st missile wing team at Malmstrom airbase. Earlier, on March 23, a launch was carried out with the participation of the 90th missile wing at Warren Air Base. Thus, during the week, the combat crew skills of two of the three American ICBM bases were tested, on which 450 Minuteman III missiles were on alert.
      http://novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/
      1. Andrey Yuryevich 5 September 2015 03: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: BoA KAA
        On March 27, 2015 at 03:53 local time (10:53 UTC, 13:53 UHF), the Minuteman III ICBM was launched from the US Air Force base “Vandenberg”

        Sasha, they just pulled in honor of my birthday! Chinese fireworks ended, I had to run the "minuteman", otherwise at 13:55, I would declare war on them! yes laughing hi
    2. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 4 September 2015 22: 51 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And they save on the purchase of our engines for rockets, there are none of them!
  • ALEA IACTA EST 4 September 2015 19: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Peremoga! Hail! Yak so ?! Great Ukraine in 25th place ?! Ukrainian army is the strongest in Europe! lol
    Surprised that Britain is stronger than France. Also did not expect to see Taiwan in 15th place. request
    1. Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 45 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      That's why you are so! What did Porosh say? Ukroarmia - the strongest in Europe! Point. Do not disappoint him, he will read your comment, be upset, get drunk ... again then he will begin to carry the crap ... pity ALL!)))
    2. The comment was deleted.
  • Altona 4 September 2015 19: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Indian army has received such a high mark? As the largest buyer of expensive weapons?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • pirate 4 September 2015 19: 10 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Ratings are a relative thing. They did not take into account the military spirit of our army. When our cartridges run out, we with sapper blades on Prem tanks !!!
    1. ksv1973 4 September 2015 19: 30 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: pirate
      Ratings are a relative thing. They did not take into account the military spirit of our army. When our cartridges run out, we with sapper blades on Prem tanks !!!

      Keep!
      I will add: Belarusians are no worse than us. And they certainly can’t be in the ratings below some Sweden or Singapore, whose soldiers without toilet paper in a backpack and will not take up arms! All these ratings are from the evil one ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Mama_Cholli 4 September 2015 19: 43 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      But with amers in films, the cartridges almost never end .... 100500 charging pistols. )))
      1. ksv1973 4 September 2015 20: 39 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        So in their films and music videos and women all are “calibrated” - 90x60x90. Or so.
        And look somewhere on the Internet at ordinary ordinary American women or even at their "stars" without makeup - you just want to buy a PM with one cartridge. But only one glance at Mom’s photo immediately saves from this rash step. Or sisters. Or wives.
        The heart immediately calms down, because the eyes see and give the brain a command that there are REALLY beautiful women for whom IT IS NECESSARY to live and for whom to die - the greatest blessing and the greatest honor!
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • AdekvatNICK 4 September 2015 19: 10 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    but the military budget of the countries. There China passed us.
    Who cares, feel free to click on the link.

    http://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.asp
  • Altona 4 September 2015 19: 13 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    The Swedish army is higher than the Ukrainian ... The Swedes pledged to “hold back” us for two weeks (!!) ... But Ukraine has been holding us back for a year and a half ... laughing
    1. Kos_kalinki9 4 September 2015 20: 54 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yeah, and the armored cavalry divisions in batches destroys. Offended Ukraine oh offended.
      Quote: Altona
      The Swedish army is higher than the Ukrainian ... The Swedes pledged to “hold back” us for two weeks (!!) ... But Ukraine has been holding us back for a year and a half ... laughing
  • Vladimir 1964 4 September 2015 19: 18 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    A very strange rating, even in the first 25 countries it is not clear from what criteria Australia and Canada took such high positions, why Pakistan is so low, and what Poland and Ukraine do in this group.
  • Dr. Bormental 4 September 2015 19: 20 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Who watched the parade in China yesterday? This is some kind of miracle ... soldiers are forbidden to blink !!! Boxes are just a masterpiece. Of course, our parade for the 70th anniversary is wonderful, but the Chinese ... it's something with something .. I became a little afraid of them))))
    1. AdekvatNICK 4 September 2015 19: 24 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      But how do you like this?))
    2. Altona 4 September 2015 19: 30 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Dr. Bormental
      Who watched the parade in China yesterday? This is some kind of miracle ... soldiers are forbidden to blink !!! Boxes are just a masterpiece. Of course, our parade for the 70th anniversary is wonderful, but the Chinese ... it's something with something .. I became a little afraid of them))))

      ------------------------
      Their training is certainly good, but it looks a bit like a train ... And no one needs a boyazzo ... laughing
      1. AdekvatNICK 4 September 2015 19: 35 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        nothing can compare with the training of the Ukrainian army. This is a training and you tell me about some Chinese)))

      2. Rader 4 September 2015 20: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Their training is certainly good, but it looks a bit like a train ... A boyazzo doesn’t need anyone ... laughing

        Here it is ... Somehow the parade in Moscow was something more soulful. wink His is always clearer and closer to his heart.
  • Karabas 4 September 2015 19: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Where in the rating is RUSSIAN SPIRIT?
    1. digo 4 September 2015 19: 38 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Karabas
      Where in the rating is RUSSIAN SPIRIT?

      So the Russian spirit, only among the Rassian peoples has it, while others have it dumb request
      ... They have courage, fanaticism, heroism (super-heroism !!!), and the bar falls only among ours (and this often happens, only when the enemy is about to celebrate a victory) angry
      And what kind of rating from one nation ... hi wink
    2. Masya masya 4 September 2015 20: 40 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Then they have in their power the immortal, babaaga, goblin! "Where there is a Russian spirit, Russia smells here!" Although with the immortal I got excited ...
  • kolkulon 4 September 2015 19: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    China, I think they don’t even worry about the rating. The war showed hu from hu.
  • 79807420129 4 September 2015 19: 25 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Kakly offended. How so? They're the strongest in. Europe? Yes, Obama himself is afraid of them, detailed weapons do not give
  • Armored optimist 4 September 2015 19: 27 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    US Army in all! ground operations received Lyuli and with disgrace took her legs.
  • dr.star75 4 September 2015 19: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    belay Army of the SGA in 1st place?! Has it won at least one war? Pleased: The Swedish army is slightly better than the Ukrainian (yesterday I watched a clip-parody of the Swedish army). Israel is higher than Iran ... no comment. I (would) in the first place naturally put ours. 1. The most capable nuclear fist! “If we won’t be alive, after us nothing!” (The motto of the Airborne Forces: nobody but us) .2.Only our Army and Hitler Germany have experience of large-scale military operations across the continent. (I wanted to put the German army in 2nd place of honor, but since she had only 200 tanks, I changed my mind). The Chinese army is the most numerous, and if you imagine the mobilization reserve ... it’s terrible at all! (Although the Yaps did not win without us) -2nd place by right. 3. The place is India. Purchased our weapons more than the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, and the most modern. The Indian Air Force in training battles brings down all rivals. and + 1bn. population! but then probably the army of the SGA and then the tight fight for 4th place.
    1. Astrahanec 6 September 2015 19: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      the feeling that you are 30 years younger. write like a teenager. change your nickname to dr.star2005
  • fa2998 4 September 2015 19: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Dr. Bormental
    0.1865 + 0.2315 = good

    As I understand it, in this rating, the smaller the better. I was very surprised at the place of Taiwan-15 and Egypt-18 (even those warriors), they will lose their tanks and aircraft on the first day. I still can’t understand where at 25 South Africa, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, is better than Ukraine, Egypt, Taiwan. request hi
  • lilian 4 September 2015 19: 34 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    It seems that the rating of the male genital organs amounted to.
    It would be better to discuss the well-being rating, living standards, ecology, safety, medicine and education, scientific and technical achievements.
    Now I’m getting nervous when I hear on TV about another new weapon, development, testing, modernization ... I would like to know how many cars, tractors, harvesters Russia has produced, how many millions tons of grain, vegetables, how many hectares of land have been cultivated and sown.
  • nord62 4 September 2015 19: 34 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    As already zadolbali all these fake ratings. Yes, from the same Somalis the same Swedes will flee with all their might! Well clown rating - nothing serious! laughing
  • demoniac1666 4 September 2015 19: 35 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I would not really trust all sorts of ratings))) Who compiles them, what criteria are guided by, and most importantly: in whose interests (who paid for it, after all, it’s not free ...) hi
  • Wolverine 4 September 2015 19: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Most importantly, we are stronger in spirit than everyone else, albeit second in armaments.
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 4 September 2015 22: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And in total with the Chinese are stronger than all!
      1. Astrahanec 6 September 2015 19: 51 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        against the sum of NATO and their satellites? Oh oh
  • Haettenschweiler 4 September 2015 19: 39 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    More not a single war not won by ratings.
    In what, interestingly, place would the authors of the rating place the German army of the 1930s? A small, bloodless World War I country with a scanty army ... and it is precisely the latter, welded together with steel discipline and armed with the latest military doctrine, the “blitzkrieg” wiped its feet on all the states of Europe, except, perhaps, England, which it saved only English Channel.
  • sv68 4 September 2015 19: 41 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Estonians are now urgently mobilizing a regiment of combat snails, and show the whole world what an angry Estonian warrior is all about, they will capture the hut of a forester and will defend it for three hours !!!
    1. ALEA IACTA EST 4 September 2015 20: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And they will arrange a raid on Pskov. And Khan ... recourse
  • samoletil18 4 September 2015 19: 43 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And where is the fighting spirit and the feeling of military brotherhood? And the ability to withstand the mining forces after the loss of aviation and the fleet apparently put dill higher than the North Koreans in this ranking?
    And what is this rating? The team occupying the 45th place (the national team of Belarus) will in an honest duel during 3 weeks humiliate three teams from the Baltic States in turn? Or will the team from the first place in the rating not allow Belarusians to get 9 victory points?
    Bullshit, not an object worthy of attention, this rating.
  • Alexander 3 4 September 2015 19: 44 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Ukrainians will be offended, because they have the best army in the world. They even have machine guns (maxim) in service. Armored personnel carriers with a fence, the entire fleet is underwater, planes fly only on a shaver, the connection is not transmitted, the soldiers are irresistible.
  • Mama_Cholli 4 September 2015 19: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    In Europe, Germans and Slavs are able to fight on earth, the rest are extras ...

    Pisi: If our army holds an advantage in the number of tanks, then I wonder which army is the first in the number of gays and lesbians? This rating probably did not take into account. The results are incorrect ...
    )))
    1. dr.star75 4 September 2015 20: 06 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Germans and Slavs can fight on earth in Europe ????? DO NOT tell me when the Germans became Germans (the nation?) And where were they when the RUSSIANS took Paris in 1813? And what can be called Russian (instead of which they glorify) great tolerance is not then call not the Germans, but also the Goths or whatever else the boot. And then they brought fashion: If the Russian feat was accomplished - this is the USSR, but if it is to a different nation, then it is pointed out!
      1. Alexander 3 4 September 2015 21: 00 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        I WILL SUPPORT YOU WHERE THE Scythian tribes passed THERE ANYWHERE RUSSIA. READ (GREAT TARTARIA)
        1. dr.star75 5 September 2015 09: 55 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          I am aware of Tartaria. And then 300 (!) Years there was a country, but nobody knows about it! The minus minders have no arguments, otherwise they answered. You plus for support and courage.
  • X Y Z 4 September 2015 20: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    With such expenses for advertising the American army, let’s not be the first! The most important thing is not to allow a real test by an equal opponent of its combat readiness. Discovery unpleasant for Americans is possible.
    1. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 4 September 2015 22: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And the Chinese in the parade showed ballistic "killer aircraft carriers", which nullified the US Navy! This rating has not yet been taken into account before the parade!
  • Bezarius 4 September 2015 20: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The strength of Iran and Vietnam is clearly underestimated. North Korea, as I understand it, no, because there is little information?
  • demandy1 4 September 2015 20: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, count ratings, draw parallels ...
  • roskot 4 September 2015 20: 13 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If you believe the data presented in the Global Firepower ranking,

    And if you do not believe it. Who measured with whom power on the battlefield. And where is the DPR and LPR army?
  • Dima Čalevo 4 September 2015 20: 14 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Am I on the censor. Why are you so angry? What does it mean to kill, destroy? The logic “we don’t want war, and in general for peace, especially kills me, but the Americans got so tired that it's time to teach them a lesson and attack first”
    I’ll look at you, the romance of war, when the first shell flies over you, yes yes
    1. Nagaibak 4 September 2015 20: 29 New
      • -2
      • 0
      -2
      Dima Čalevo "Did I get on the censor. Isn’t you? Why are you so angry? What does it mean to" kill "or" destroy "? The logic is especially killing me" we don’t want war, and generally for peace, but the Americans got so tired that it’s time to teach them a lesson and attack first ""
      Dima, where are you from?))) Somehow we don’t write in our way.)))
  • NordUral 4 September 2015 20: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A real rating will determine the victory parade in the capital of the victorious country.
  • 1 Nikita 4 September 2015 20: 46 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The rating, of course, is an indicator, but Russia, on all sides, except the North and East, is surrounded by land, on which there are a lot of military bases and well-wishers. At the same time, the United States is in such an ideal geographical position that it obviously puts it in a position practically unattainable by conventional weapons. And here at least ten ratings determine, but it (the USA) is so easy not to take. And they take full advantage of their inaccessibility. Well, yes, all good things someday will certainly end.
  • Basil_3 4 September 2015 20: 54 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    There are a couple of comments, but Ukraine at 25th place is just rzhach))))))))))
  • Abakan 4 September 2015 21: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: shooter18
    in the whole history, they reached Moscow and raked))

    current reached Moscow, and Novosib Abakan Vladik) zayeb ... Xia go))
  • moskowit 4 September 2015 21: 21 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    All these game ratings are miserable. The fighting spirit of the Russian Soldier is invincible!
  • tokens2 4 September 2015 21: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Yes, in the rating this rating. Together with experts.
    Thailand is above Vietnam, Brazil and Iran!
    1. Vivan 4 September 2015 22: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The authors came to this conclusion after visiting the naval base of Pattaya.
  • Horst78 4 September 2015 21: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Bullshit all these ratings. The best army is the one that won. Everything else is lyrics. And for 2000 years we have been bending those who come to us with a sword.
  • thinker 4 September 2015 22: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: kocclissi
    Soaping the eyes of the so-called "world obschelstvennosti" they say we are the first on the planet of the whole ... who do you put: on a karate athlete or on a melee melee who has been beaten by life?

    Which karate athlete? Rather, a bodybuilder pumped with steroids and rubbed with petroleum jelly. Yes, big, beautiful, but only at a beauty contest.
  • benefactor21 4 September 2015 22: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Bullshit all these ratings! No army can compare with Russia in experience and fighting spirit! It’s in our blood ..... 145 million controls such a territory! Who else wants to test us for a little tooth?


    It’s not the ratings that decide on the battlefield, no matter how multi-factorial they are, but the specific circumstances of the next “world” and still the motivation of the warrior, and she (motivation) is always higher if on the side of the truth (“our cause is right”). And what the American inspire (by the way, this is a collective white gentleman, a former slave - an African American, a diverse hook, a red-skinned survivor) from childhood the American dream - the idea of ​​success using any methods, instead of the idea of ​​defending the Homeland (after all, they never defended their Homeland on their territory - Pearl Harbor does not count).
  • hunt 4 September 2015 22: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: kot stepan
    Uncle, learn to engage in dialogue. But in the battles for Carthage, the same thing you need to participate in order to describe the mode of action of the Roman army ?! Do not make you think of you as a collective farmer, for whom your favorite arguments are: "Have you been there?" or "did you see it?"

    I have presentations for comparisons as a participant.
  • hunt 4 September 2015 22: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: kot stepan
    Uncle, learn to engage in dialogue. But in the battles for Carthage, the same thing you need to participate in order to describe the mode of action of the Roman army ?! Do not make you think of you as a collective farmer, for whom your favorite arguments are: "Have you been there?" or "did you see it?"

    I was not in Carthage, I was in Grozny.
  • hunt 4 September 2015 23: 08 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Truth is born in a dispute, but without mutual insults. Learn to be an opponent, not a historical charlotte.
  • sablezub81 4 September 2015 23: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: stock buildbat
    American WHO, excuse me, do not underestimate ??? WARRIORS ??? Yes there is not a single soldier, not that of a warrior. This is a bunch of tattered jackals, capable of only attacking from the back, but as soon as they are at least a little answered, throwing in pieces.
    This is trash, not people.

    I want to know who put the cons? Who is sure that there are good soldiers in the US Army ??? that the frames do not come to mind how they relieve the need for the corpses of Iraqis (this is probably what real warriors do ...) ????? or maybe remember how they tried to capture El Fallujah in Iraq ... please read about it ... At the expense of technology, it’s enough to remember about the F-22 and you can immediately see that those who are minus this is either the 5th column, or completely stupid people without memory and basic knowledge ... just no words ...
  • alexander 2 4 September 2015 23: 39 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: NordUral
    Americans are strong, mainly not by soldiers, but by technology. And the future war will just be the one where technology will solve everything.

    They said the same thing before the Great Patriotic War, though there were no nuclear weapons then. The enemy, before an attack, always calculates the country's potential and only after seeing weakness attacks. Amers need an advantage at least ten times and that they could not use nuclear weapons. For this, Euro PRO is needed. It does not matter whether it protects the Americans or not, the main thing is that it creates the illusion of invulnerability, which means that the threat of nuclear war is growing. In the words of Zadornov: "They always attack our state, but receive urdules from their homeland."