New radar stations developed in Iran

15
The commander of the Iranian air defense base, Khatam al-Anbiya, Brigadier General Farzad Esmaili, showed the army leadership two new types of radar stations: Bina and Nazir, developed by young Iranian scientists.

New radar stations developed in Iran


"These radars are capable of operating at different frequencies, as well as identifying and capturing targets before they reach the borders of the Islamic Republic," he said. "Military Industrial Courier".

In addition, during the presentation at the exhibition in Tehran, a new version of the Kayhan Radar, which has already entered service, was shown - a mobile high-resolution system that identifies air targets with increased accuracy.

Also, the commanders of the Iranian army saw various radar systems, including for creating interference and identifying “friend or foe”. The latter can simultaneously control up to 100 targets simultaneously.
  • http://vpk-news.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 September 2015 05: 46
    With an initiative !! good For amers and its satellites, the trouble is the beginning. bully
    1. +2
      2 September 2015 05: 51
      they will have trouble when Iran has nuclear weapons, this is really a disaster, because Russia alone is standing in their way (China 3.14ndos is not an opponent, not an ally, but not an opponent, he is on his own), and then at least and regional scale (not global, but already a player in a strategic region) but still an adversary. and nuclear weapons give a guarantee that humanitarian bombing will not take place in their country.
      1. -1
        2 September 2015 07: 08
        Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran should deprive not only the leaders of America, but also the leaders of Russia. Let's not forget that Ayatollah Khomeini called the Soviet Union "Red Satan". And the ideology and raison d'être of the Iranian regime of the Ayatollahs is to export the Islamic revolution. Does Russia, with its growing Muslim population, need such a neighbor with a nuclear baton on its southern border?
        1. +1
          2 September 2015 10: 11
          he can call him even a pot, I judge by business, not by words, and business shows that Iran was not going to attack anyone and is not going to, but howls only if they attack him.
          but Israel often attacked first, the headquarters is not in the Persian eye, it is necessary to look for a log.
      2. -3
        2 September 2015 08: 46
        If there is a war with the West and China does not stand with us shoulder to shoulder, then after a while they will stab us in the back. The thirst for the Far East is strong, and if objectively, then China is not our friend, but ... familiar. but if the turmoil starts from Taiwan or Japan, then Russia will harness for "brother".
      3. -2
        2 September 2015 17: 42
        Quote: just explo
        they’ll have trouble when Iran has nuclear weapons,

        There will be no trouble, because Iran will not have nuclear weapons - won't let .
        Quote: anokem
        and things show that Iran was not going to attack anyone and is not going to,

        Well, yes, in each speech, Iranian leaders curse everyone they remember, and our Israel promise to destroy it at all. And what, do you really think that someone here agrees with this?
        Quote: just explo
        but Israel often attacked first,

        And it will deliver a preemptive strike if such a decision is made by the country's leadership. angry . Who wants to die from the nuclear bombardment of the possessed ayatollahs. stop
        1. +1
          2 September 2015 17: 53
          we will not allow ...

          Brothers of the Jews, your "allowance" will immediately dry up as soon as your dispute, Pindoctan, is blown away ... And his process is already in full swing ... So sit there, mother, and don't ... you know!
          1. -1
            2 September 2015 18: 46
            Quote: Alexkorzun
            Brothers of Jews, your "allowance" will immediately dry up as soon as your argument, Pindoctan, is blown away ...

            I could object to you with reason, but I won’t do it - I looked at your profile picture and thought it over. I wish you hello! hi
    2. +3
      2 September 2015 05: 55
      Quote: duche
      With an initiative !! For amers and its satellites - troubles begin

      All "independently developed" Iranian radars are based on American, Soviet and, more recently, Chinese stations.
      Iranian air controls:
      http://topwar.ru/30817-iranskie-sredstva-kontrolya-vozdushnoy-obstanovki.html
      1. +5
        2 September 2015 06: 31
        Yes, so what?
        I would be glad if our people spied someone else’s NATO development and borrowed something ...
        The main thing is that it works EFFECTIVELY!
      2. +1
        2 September 2015 10: 31
        Quote: Bongo
        Quote: duche
        With an initiative !! For amers and its satellites - troubles begin

        All "independently developed" Iranian radars are based on American, Soviet and, more recently, Chinese stations.

        So what? USSR never copied anything western?
    3. +1
      2 September 2015 12: 45
      Why didn’t they put the photo? Behind the General is the Sayyad-2 Air Defense.

      And here is the radar photo


      1. 0
        2 September 2015 18: 52
        And here is a short video from this show:
  2. +7
    2 September 2015 06: 07
    Copy or design yourself is not so important, the main thing that would work.
  3. +2
    2 September 2015 06: 13
    They are still far from ours, but moving in the right direction.
  4. +1
    2 September 2015 07: 03
    There is nothing to talk about, no pictures, no parameters, nothing at all, just words
  5. +2
    2 September 2015 07: 54
    Quote: just EXPL
    they will have trouble when Iran has nuclear weapons, this is really a disaster, because Russia alone is standing in their way (China 3.14ndos is not an opponent, not an ally, but not an opponent, he is on his own), and then at least and regional scale (not global, but already a player in a strategic region) but still an adversary. and nuclear weapons give a guarantee that humanitarian bombing will not take place in their country.

    There was an article on VO recently that Pakistan is going to triple its nuclear arsenal. And many wrote that in their opinion, it is impossible to give nuclear weapons to Islamic countries. so double standards? Or are we acting on the principle "XXX of course son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch"?
    1. +1
      2 September 2015 08: 51
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: just EXPL
      they will have trouble when Iran has nuclear weapons, this is really a disaster, because Russia alone is standing in their way (China 3.14ndos is not an opponent, not an ally, but not an opponent, he is on his own), and then at least and regional scale (not global, but already a player in a strategic region) but still an adversary. and nuclear weapons give a guarantee that humanitarian bombing will not take place in their country.

      There was an article on VO recently that Pakistan is going to triple its nuclear arsenal. And many wrote that in their opinion, it is impossible to give nuclear weapons to Islamic countries. so double standards? Or are we acting on the principle "XXX of course son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch"?

      Iran’s borders on the castle and a heterogeneous shusher like the Taliban and the Isis do not stay there. In Pakistan, all villages are teeming with all evil spirits; the authorities do not support them, but they do not fight. American aviation flies and bombs disregarding the opinion of Pakistan, which in turn only protests against such outrageous behavior, I doubt that such a ride in the sky of Iran. Islam has nothing to do with it, there are scumbags in all religions, if Ukraine had nuclear weapons, then it probably has long been pulled somewhere.
  6. +1
    2 September 2015 10: 09
    Quote: sir.jonn
    Islam has nothing to do with it

    Right But in the comments on the article about Pakistan, there was an emphasis on exactly what You can not give nuclear weapons to an Islamic country
    1. +1
      2 September 2015 10: 43
      Quote: Old26
      Quote: sir.jonn
      Islam has nothing to do with it

      Right But in the comments on the article about Pakistan, there was an emphasis on exactly what You can not give nuclear weapons to an Islamic country

      The Catholic-Protestant United States did so much evil that the Islamists never dreamed of. And Islamism was supported or supported by the states - in Afghanistan, Chechnya, Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria. And the American breaking news hang people up to their ears about how the United States like to fight international terrorism.
      I wonder what will happen to a sick ISIS man when he realizes that ISIS was created with the money of "infidels" laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"