Military Review
Sign In Register

British authorities will spend 771 million dollars to upgrade the base of nuclear submarines

19
British authorities plan to spend about 771 million dollars to upgrade the Royal Navy's Faslane nuclear submarine base, which is in Scotland, the newspaper said "Sight".



In particular, according to the contract, the message about which appeared on Monday, in the next ten years it is planned to build new lifts, piers and breakwaters.

The British nuclear submarine fleet, consisting of four Vanguard class submarines equipped with Trident nuclear ballistic missiles, is deployed at the Faslane base on the River Clyde. One of the submarines is constantly on combat duty.

Earlier, British Finance Minister George Osborne said that, thanks to a project to modernize the base of submarines, 6.7 thousands of jobs would be created.
Photos used:
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
19 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 1 September 2015 07: 39
    -3
    They will look for Russian submarines around the base.
    1. vodolaz
      vodolaz 1 September 2015 07: 44
      +3
      Quote: avvg
      They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

      They will be looking for a long time))))) Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in essence this is a nominal rank. 4 submarines are not serious.
      1. Penetrator
        Penetrator 1 September 2015 07: 46
        +5
        Quote: vodolaz

        They will be looking for a long time))))) Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in essence this is a nominal rank. 4 submarines are not serious.

        Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 1 September 2015 07: 59
          -1
          Quote: Penetrator
          Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.

          Why not? Or you sink them one left.
          1. Penetrator
            Penetrator 1 September 2015 08: 22
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Quote: Penetrator
            Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.

            Why not? Or you sink them one left.

            I speak without sarcasm. This is really a serious force, especially when the missiles of these submarines are aimed at our cities.
        2. anokem
          anokem 1 September 2015 09: 50
          0
          And 6 boats of project 212 with an air-independent power plant and autonomy of 50 days and nuclear cruise missiles on board is this power?
      2. Alex_Rarog
        Alex_Rarog 1 September 2015 08: 21
        0
        You forgot to mention that these missiles belong to the states.
      3. Vadim237
        Vadim237 1 September 2015 12: 10
        0
        These 4 submarines carry 16 ICBMs each missile can carry 10 warheads - if necessary and in case of war they will very quickly cover a third of our military bases in 7 minutes.
      4. strannik1985
        strannik1985 1 September 2015 14: 58
        0
        We have KON PLARB 0,1-0,15 (and even during the USSR it never exceeded 0,5 (in the early 80s, due to the use of equipment and personnel for wear), i.e. from both fleets in the service of 1 -2 SSBNs, and sometimes not even a single one. A fresh photo from Gadzhievo in confirmation, that is, on the use of ICBMs (SLBMs) ​​on a nuclear submarine, we are, by and large, equal to Britain (provided that the full BC is carried on English boats).
    2. gispanec
      gispanec 1 September 2015 07: 54
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

      Yes they will not ..... not to our boats right now
    3. ava09
      ava09 1 September 2015 09: 17
      0
      ????? If SSBNs are placed on the island, this only means that those who made the decision and the initiates either have already left this territory, or are already on "suitcases".
  2. SAM 5
    SAM 5 1 September 2015 07: 40
    +3
    And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.
    1. vodolaz
      vodolaz 1 September 2015 07: 45
      +2
      Quote: SAM 5
      And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.

      Money, money and money again. England took Scotland purely financially and retained the same.
      1. Voha_krim
        Voha_krim 1 September 2015 07: 57
        +1
        Quote: vodolaz
        Quote: SAM 5
        And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.

        Money, money and money again. England took Scotland purely financially and retained the same.

        On TV they showed as counted the voices and as voted! "Democracy"! If everything was according to the rules, Scotland would be independent ... from Britain. And from the Americos?
  3. mad
    mad 1 September 2015 07: 46
    +1
    Let the Internet be taken to cabins, they wrote that without Facebook no one wants to serve on submarines.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 1 September 2015 07: 47
    0
    British authorities plan to spend about 771 million dollars to modernize the base


    And what is included in this modernization is interesting ... the modernization of berths or nuclear weapons storage facilities for submarines.
  5. atamankko
    atamankko 1 September 2015 08: 12
    0
    Let them spend money wherever they want without benefit.
  6. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa 1 September 2015 08: 24
    +1
    So the old GB woman is forced to fork out for her nuclear forces.
    You look, so soon they’ll stop grabbing oatmeal, not like coffee with a croissant!
    Do not want to live peacefully - you have to tighten your belts. sad
  7. Million
    Million 1 September 2015 08: 29
    0
    let them spend, let them be afraid
  8. MolGro
    MolGro 1 September 2015 08: 58
    0
    From the beginning, let them finish it)) And then two firs have adopted the rest have not finished building yet))
  9. Old26
    Old26 1 September 2015 09: 17
    0
    Quote: avvg
    They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

    The unkilled argument. But "sorry, I don't recognize you in makeup" ... Forgive me, but I do not grasp the logical connection between the modernization of the base and the search for Russian boats. After all, proceeding from this, the modernization of the base in Vilyuchinsk means that we will start looking for "Virginia" there?

    Quote: vodolaz
    Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in fact the title is nominal. 4 submarines are not serious.

    Well, based on this, there are only two "non-nominal" nuclear powers in the world. Russia and the United States, all others are nominal. The PRC EMNIP has 4 SSBNs of project 094 and one outdated project 091. Moreover, they all carry 12 missiles.
    Purely nominal is France with its 4 SSBNs. Well, India, Pakistan, Israel, and even more so the DPRK, do not dare to call the language even nominal nuclear powers. They don’t have submarines (since the number of boats is a rating criterion)

    Quote: Alex_Rarog
    You forgot to mention that those missiles belong to the states

    So what? They are bought in the USA, although MOTs do take place in the USA. But they are on boats in the UK and under its operational management

    Quote: The same LYOKHA
    And what is included in this modernization is interesting ... the modernization of berths or nuclear weapons storage facilities for submarines.

    And no one knows what kind of modernization it is, but everyone has already decided everything and ridiculed the UK
    The routine process caused a storm of emotions.

    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
    So the old GB woman is forced to fork out for her nuclear forces.

    Actually, this does not apply to nuclear forces, as you write, forced to fork out.
    This is not the purchase of new tridents, not the laying of a new missile carrier. This is a base upgrade. Or is this not happening with us, are bases not being reconstructed and modernized ???

    Quote: atamankko
    Let them spend money wherever they want without benefit.

    In fact, modernization is just a waste of money to good use. Everything is better than drank
  10. Old26
    Old26 1 September 2015 09: 29
    0
    Quote: ava09
    If SSBNs are placed on the island, this only means that those who made the decision and the initiates either have already left this territory, or are already on "suitcases".

    ????????????? Damn, they’ve been on the islands since 1967 !!!!!!!!!!!! Almost half a century

    Quote: MolGro
    From the beginning, let them finish it)) And then two firs have adopted the rest have not finished building yet))

    Submarines with missiles ??? Are you probably stuck in 1995? Since the two were adopted in 1995. The first - Wangard - 93, the second - 95, the third at 96 and the last, the fourth at 99