British authorities will spend 771 million dollars to upgrade the base of nuclear submarines

British authorities plan to spend about 771 million dollars to upgrade the Royal Navy's Faslane nuclear submarine base, which is in Scotland, the newspaper said "Sight".

In particular, according to the contract, the message about which appeared on Monday, in the next ten years it is planned to build new lifts, piers and breakwaters.

The British nuclear submarine fleet, consisting of four Vanguard class submarines equipped with Trident nuclear ballistic missiles, is deployed at the Faslane base on the River Clyde. One of the submarines is constantly on combat duty.

Earlier, British Finance Minister George Osborne said that, thanks to a project to modernize the base of submarines, 6.7 thousands of jobs would be created.

Comments

[avvg]

They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

[vodolaz]

Quote: avvg

They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

They will be looking for a long time))))) Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in essence this is a nominal rank. 4 submarines are not serious.

[Penetrator]

Quote: vodolaz

They will be looking for a long time))))) Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in essence this is a nominal rank. 4 submarines are not serious.

Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.

[Alexander Romanov]

Quote: Penetrator

Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.

Why not? Or you sink them one left.

[Penetrator]

Quote: Alexander Romanov

Quote: Penetrator

Four modern submarines with ballistic missiles is VERY serious, believe me.

Why not? Or you sink them one left.

I speak without sarcasm. This is really a serious force, especially when the missiles of these submarines are aimed at our cities.

[anokem]

And 6 boats of project 212 with an air-independent power plant and autonomy of 50 days and nuclear cruise missiles on board is this power?

[Alex_Rarog]

You forgot to mention that these missiles belong to the states.

[Vadim237]

These 4 submarines carry 16 ICBMs each missile can carry 10 warheads - if necessary and in case of war they will very quickly cover a third of our military bases in 7 minutes.

[strannik1985]

We have KON PLARB 0,1-0,15 (and even during the USSR it never exceeded 0,5 (in the early 80s, due to the use of equipment and personnel for wear), i.e. from both fleets in the service of 1 -2 SSBNs, and sometimes not even a single one. A fresh photo from Gadzhievo in confirmation, that is, on the use of ICBMs (SLBMs) ​​on a nuclear submarine, we are, by and large, equal to Britain (provided that the full BC is carried on English boats).

[gispanec]

Quote: avvg

They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

Yes they will not ..... not to our boats right now

[ava09]

????? If SSBNs are placed on the island, this only means that those who made the decision and the initiates either have already left this territory, or are already on "suitcases".

[SAM 5]

And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.

[vodolaz]

Quote: SAM 5

And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.

Money, money and money again. England took Scotland purely financially and retained the same.

[Voha_krim]

Quote: vodolaz

Quote: SAM 5

And why did Scotland not separate from Britain.

Money, money and money again. England took Scotland purely financially and retained the same.

On TV they showed How counted the voices and How voted! "Democracy"! If everything was according to the rules, Scotland would be independent ... from Britain. And from the Americos?

[mad]

Let the Internet be taken to cabins, they wrote that without Facebook no one wants to serve on submarines.

[Same lech]

British authorities plan to spend about 771 million dollars to modernize the base

And what is included in this modernization is interesting ... the modernization of berths or nuclear weapons storage facilities for submarines.

[atamankko]

Let them spend money wherever they want without benefit.

[Boa kaa]

So the old GB woman is forced to fork out for her nuclear forces.
You look, so soon they’ll stop grabbing oatmeal, not like coffee with a croissant!
Do not want to live peacefully - you have to tighten your belts.

[Million]

let them spend, let them be afraid

[MolGro]

From the beginning, let them finish it)) And then two firs have adopted the rest have not finished building yet))

[Old26]

Quote: avvg

They will look for Russian submarines around the base.

The unkilled argument. But "sorry, I don't recognize you in makeup" ... Forgive me, but I do not grasp the logical connection between the modernization of the base and the search for Russian boats. After all, proceeding from this, the modernization of the base in Vilyuchinsk means that we will start looking for "Virginia" there?

Quote: vodolaz

Great Britain, although it is a nuclear power, but in fact the title is nominal. 4 submarines are not serious.

Well, based on this, there are only two "non-nominal" nuclear powers in the world. Russia and the United States, all others are nominal. The PRC EMNIP has 4 SSBNs of project 094 and one outdated project 091. Moreover, they all carry 12 missiles.
Purely nominal is France with its 4 SSBNs. Well, India, Pakistan, Israel, and even more so the DPRK, do not dare to call the language even nominal nuclear powers. They don’t have submarines (since the number of boats is a rating criterion)

Quote: Alex_Rarog

You forgot to mention that those missiles belong to the states

So what? They are bought in the USA, although MOTs do take place in the USA. But they are on boats in the UK and under its operational management

Quote: The same LYOKHA

And what is included in this modernization is interesting ... the modernization of berths or nuclear weapons storage facilities for submarines.

And no one knows what kind of modernization it is, but everyone has already decided everything and ridiculed the UK
The routine process caused a storm of emotions.

Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

So the old GB woman is forced to fork out for her nuclear forces.

Actually, this does not apply to nuclear forces, as you write, forced to fork out.
This is not the purchase of new tridents, not the laying of a new missile carrier. This is a base upgrade. Or is this not happening with us, are bases not being reconstructed and modernized ???

Quote: atamankko

Let them spend money wherever they want without benefit.

In fact, modernization is just a waste of money to good use. Everything is better than drank

[Old26]

Quote: ava09

If SSBNs are placed on the island, this only means that those who made the decision and the initiates either have already left this territory, or are already on "suitcases".

????????????? Damn, they’ve been on the islands since 1967 !!!!!!!!!!!! Almost half a century

Quote: MolGro

From the beginning, let them finish it)) And then two firs have adopted the rest have not finished building yet))

Submarines with missiles ??? Are you probably stuck in 1995? Since the two were adopted in 1995. The first - Wangard - 93, the second - 95, the third at 96 and the last, the fourth at 99