Snapshots ZRPK "Pantsir-С1" UAE in the territory of Yemen

59
Blog The Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies has published images of the Pantsir-S1 anti-aircraft missile and gun systems from the air defense and air forces of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which were spotted near the city of Marib in central Yemen.

Snapshots ZRPK "Pantsir-С1" UAE in the territory of Yemen


The UAE’s military ordered the Pantsir-C1 ZRPK batch based on the MAN SX45 (8X8) vehicle chassis from 50 combat units from the Russian Instrument Design Bureau in 2009.

  • http://bmpd.livejournal.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    31 August 2015 09: 36
    It would be interesting to learn about the real work of the system.
    1. +13
      31 August 2015 09: 43
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      It would be interesting to learn about the real work of the system.

      Against whom can they work in Yemen?
      1. +11
        31 August 2015 09: 50
        Against whom can they work in Yemen?
        apparently against OTRK. Why then do you think they dragged them there)))) Yemen is active with their rockets hammering.
        1. +1
          31 August 2015 10: 24
          Quote: professor
          Against whom can they work in Yemen?

          if there is no target and enemy, then the generals are stupid like felt boots if they have secured equipment that is not needed there, besides, DG can be destroyed or even captured ....
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          31 August 2015 10: 32
          Quote: Svetly
          apparently against OTRK. Why then do you think they dragged them there))))

          The Saudis of the Scada of Yemen are being knocked down by the Patriots; this is impossible from the Shell.
      2. +4
        31 August 2015 09: 51
        Russia as a manufacturer of systems, violet, whom the Arabs will bring down, we have already received our money.
        Now the main thing for us to know HOW the system works.
      3. +2
        31 August 2015 09: 53
        Against whom can they work in Yemen?

        I completely agree, except on the ground with machine guns, but to use C1 is barbarism))
      4. +8
        31 August 2015 09: 54
        Quote: professor
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        It would be interesting to learn about the real work of the system.

        Against whom can they work in Yemen?

        Shalom Professor. hi
        Well option 2:
        1) -Perhaps to fight the "Scuds" of Yemen. After all, the Houthis have already fired missiles of this type on the territory of the SA.
        2) -For use in the form of "Shaitan-Arba" - suppression of the Hussites by the fire of 30 mm "Pantsyr" assault rifles, especially in the case of a DB in mountainous terrain, where a large angle of elevation of the guns is very necessary.
        1. +4
          31 August 2015 10: 45
          Quote: Now we are free
          2) -For use in the form of "Shaitan-Arba" - suppression of the Hussites by the fire of 30 mm "Pantsyr" assault rifles, especially in the case of a DB in mountainous terrain, where a large angle of elevation of the guns is very necessary.


          write nonsense, use such an expensive technique in order to shoot at partisans in the mountains no one will be there. one shot from a bassoon or a contest worth a couple of thousand dollars will instantly burn this multi-million dollar product, and the Hussites have already destroyed a lot of Saudi technology in this way
          1. Hon
            +2
            31 August 2015 10: 49
            so what if it’s expensive? now pray for her? especially UAE can not be called poor
            1. 0
              31 August 2015 10: 55
              Well, shoot a gun at a sparrow is just in the spirit of a couch expert
        2. -7
          31 August 2015 11: 34
          Quote: Now we are free
          -Perhaps to fight against the "Scuds" of Yemen. After all, the Houthis have already fired missiles of this type on the territory of the SA.

          Unable to intercept Shell.

          Quote: Now we are free
          -For use in the form of "Shaitan-Arba" - suppression of the Hussites with the fire of 30 mm "Pantsyr" assault rifles, especially in the case of a DB in mountainous areas, where a large angle of elevation of the guns is very necessary.

          What ammunition is there? How much will each shot cost?
          1. +3
            31 August 2015 12: 24
            The same can be said of Patriot, unable to shoot down the Scuds.
            1. -4
              31 August 2015 12: 53
              Quote: yushch
              The same can be said of Patriot, unable to shoot down the Scuds.

              Only he does not know about it and knocks them down. lol
              1. +4
                31 August 2015 13: 19
                Only he does not know about it and knocks them down.
                Yes, but only once and then it’s necessary to launch 3-4 anti-missiles.
              2. +3
                31 August 2015 14: 40
                Quote: professor
                Only he does not know about it and knocks them down.

                Herr Professor last week we talked "nicely" in the topic (http://topwar.ru/81175-zabornaya-globalizaciya.html#comment-id-4895227),
                in which you sincerely confessed your love for everything Russian, the Russians and not love for the leadership and tasks of the leadership of the state of Russia.
                You are now belittling Carapace-C1's abilities and praising the Patriot.
                "Armor" makes the slave people of Russia and "Patriot" makes the free and democratic people of the USA and their suckers.
                From the official data: During Operation Desert Storm missiles "patriot" destroyed 39 out of 62 launched "Scuds". A total of 42 missiles fell on Israel, and 45 on Saudi Arabia. 44% of "Scuds" flew where they were sent. According to independent experts, the Iraqi armed forces managed to carry out 133 launches of the OTR, and the anti-missile defense / air defense units of the coalition forces managed to hit only 46 of them.
                "These data appear to be the most reliable."
                During the preparation and conduct of Operation Desert Storm, the anti-Iraq coalition countries led by the United States created a theater missile defense system. It was based on the Patriot air defense system: 22 batteries (132 launchers) were deployed in Saudi Arabia to cover airfields, ports, areas of deployment of troops and oil industry facilities; seven (four American, two Israeli and one Danish - a total of 48 PU) - in Israel. The general staff of the headquarters of the call acknowledged (announced how much they actually pulled, this secret) launches of 158 SAM Patriot missiles during the operation and the complex’s efficiency was 50%! Despite the fulfillment of the fire mission in almost ideal conditions (lack of radio interference, single launch of OTR, flat terrain), the effectiveness of the combat use of the upgraded Patriot air defense system was low - less than 35% (about 50% according to American experts).
                To top it off my "snatches" from various sources about the "effectiveness" of the "Patriots" you praise, check out the photos on the network about the night beauties with the number of "Patriots" launched into the skies of Israel or the UAE:
                [img]http://k40.kn3.net/taringa/2/7/5/3/4/3/5/lisandrorose/9CC.jpg?4726[/img]
                1. -4
                  31 August 2015 15: 05
                  Quote: Papakiko
                  You are now belittling Carapace-C1's abilities and praising the Patriot.

                  Now I describe the materiel:
                  Shell designed to intercept targets with characteristics where the maximum target speed is up to 1000 m / s, the range to the target is from 1.2 km to 20 km and the target height is from 15 m to 15 km.
                  Patriot designed to intercept targets with characteristics where the maximum target speed is up to 2200 m / s, the range to the target is from 3 km to 20 km and the target height is from 60 m to 25 km.

                  Now Scudmaximum speed 1400 m / s (at the final stage).
                  K72 / P-17 - SS-1C / D / E SCUD-B / C / D
                  Continue? wink
                  1. +1
                    31 August 2015 16: 05
                    Quote: professor
                    Continue?

                    You then decided to feed me-muna to death with delirium from Wikipedia and "porridge" from your head?
                    In what place did I write that the UAE is going to bring down thousands of Yemen's "Skadi B" with "Shells"?
                    I modestly reminded you of your "love" and wrote the answer to your opus (hereinafter your full quote):Only he does not know about it and knocks them down and collated information from various sources about the confrontation between "Patriots and Scuds".
                    "Armor" of the UAE in the vicinity of the city of Marib on the territory of central Yemen, and not on the border of these two states!
                    This is much more important.
                    The massacre in Yemen gained full speed and bloodsuckers whipped through the most nihachu.
                    And I do not know which of the "Shells" the UAE is going to plant from the sky of Yemen. Not "Patriot" but "Pantsir" in this case, acts as a mobile first echelon fighter.
                    1. -1
                      31 August 2015 18: 41
                      Quote: Papakiko
                      You then decided to feed me-muna to death with delirium from Wikipedia and "porridge" from your head?

                      You can’t argue with numbers. Yes? wink

                      Quote: Papakiko
                      I modestly reminded you of your "love" and wrote a response to your opus (hereinafter your full quote): Only he does not know about it and knocks them down and collated information from different sources about the confrontation between "Patriots and Scuds".

                      So. Only he does not know about it and knocks them down. Patriot repeatedly shot down the Scuds in combat. And for the last time in June of this year. fellow

                      Quote: Papakiko
                      And I do not know which of the "Shells" the UAE is going to plant from the sky of Yemen. Not "Patriot" but "Pantsir" in this case, acts as a mobile first echelon fighter.

                      "First echelon" against whom? Who flies there besides the allies of Yemen itself?
                      1. +2
                        31 August 2015 20: 09
                        Quote: professor
                        "First echelon" against whom? Who flies there besides the allies of Yemen itself?

                        You ask the Arabs!
                        Their technique and they drive it!
                        And not forum users with HERE.
                      2. +2
                        31 August 2015 20: 18
                        Quote: professor
                        Patriot repeatedly shot down the Scuds in combat. And for the last time in June of this year.

                        Another anti-record of the People's Prize "Freak of the Year" has been broken.
                        My Greetings Herr Professor.
                        Your "pompous pride" looks "weird".
                        Do not eat a tie.
                        You still have to pay debts for workdays from compatriots.
                      3. -1
                        31 August 2015 20: 22
                        Somehow you were blown away very quickly today. laughing Already boring. Have a good evening. hi
              3. +2
                31 August 2015 14: 51
                Quote: professor
                Quote: yushch
                The same can be said of Patriot, unable to shoot down the Scuds.

                Only he does not know about it and knocks them down. lol

                As you like to advise everyone about "google" to help, now you google. The Americans themselves, having analyzed the records of the alleged defeats of the Scud warheads during the "Desert Storm", came to the conclusion that your "ignorant" Patriot was stupidly late by thousandths of a second at the moment of detonation, which allowed the Scud warhead to leave the continuous zone of destruction of your ancient Patriots and hit targets on the ground. So tell the tales about the "great Patriot" tell your Israeli electorate to hawala, as they say, hope dies last.
                1. -7
                  31 August 2015 15: 07
                  Quote: yushch
                  So tell the tales about the "great Patriot" tell your Israeli electorate to hawala, as they say, hope dies last.

                  There is no need for this. The Israeli electorate has personally seen how the ancient Patriots bring down the Scuds.
                  How many Scuds shot down the Shell? wink
                  1. +3
                    31 August 2015 16: 02
                    If I’m not mistaken, even a scandal was planned for you, in connection with this problem, when this infa leaked to the media. So do not tell me about the conviction of your electorate. Of those poorly poor 40% of the allegedly intercepted Warehouses, the main warhead escaped from the attack, and in addition to the destroyed barracks with more than a hundred corpses, you also had successful Warehouse breakouts in Israel. It’s just that they were outdated at that time and most of them went into milk, but if we had modernized them in due time, then you and the Americans would have washed themselves with bloody screams.
                    1. -3
                      31 August 2015 18: 58
                      Quote: yushch
                      If I’m not mistaken, even a scandal was planned for you, in connection with this problem, when this infa leaked to the media.

                      Wrong.

                      Quote: yushch
                      So do not tell me about the conviction of your electorate.

                      Our electorate even wrote a song about this: "Al Gagot Tel Aviv"


                      Quote: yushch
                      you in Israel also had successful breakthroughs of the Warehouses. It’s just that they were outdated at that time and most of them went into milk, but if we had modernized them in due time, then you and the Americans would have washed themselves with bloody screams.

                      Interceptions not of Warehouses, but of Scuds. And "into the milk" where is it? In Batey Zikuk and Ramat Gan?
                      By the way, directly from the Scuds in Israel killed 1 (one) person. And the one who shot the Scuds washed his face with bloody screams.
                      1. +1
                        31 August 2015 19: 39
                        I may be wrong, but you are a specific "peace duke". I hope you will translate this phrase into English yourself. This hype was hushed up by yours and the mattress gun lobby. Regarding Warehouses, yelling (snot) and endings, this is a tablet corrector.
                      2. -1
                        31 August 2015 19: 50
                        Quote: yushch
                        I may be wrong, but you are a specific "peace duke". I hope you will translate this phrase into English yourself. This hype was hushed up by yours and the mattress gun lobby. Regarding Warehouses and Endings, this is a tablet corrector.

                        Is that all you can say? But what about "milk" and "blood"? wink
                      3. +1
                        31 August 2015 20: 07
                        Quote: yushch
                        I may be wrong, but you are a specific "peace duke"

                        Few Komrad are mistaken, too doubt. It's hard. wink
                        There you can widely use consoles from the great mighty Russian language. drinks
                  2. +2
                    31 August 2015 18: 13
                    Quote: professor
                    How many Scuds shot down the Shell?

                    This is only in your power, for only you are strong in myths and tales.
                    I propose to watch a vidos about the Tochka-U launches, obviously not in the steppes of Donbas.
                    Herr Professor has the opportunity to talk about the o.o.o.o. even if about the cyclists or the iron cavalry of Mordovia. Yes
                    It's all about the same "Scud", "Patriot", "Shell".
                    1. -2
                      31 August 2015 19: 11
                      Quote: Papakiko
                      Quote: professor
                      How many Scuds shot down the Shell?
                      This is only in your power, for only you are strong in myths and tales.

                      Right. Zero integers, zero tenths. However, as well as having no taxes in the world of S-300.

                      Quote: Papakiko
                      I propose to watch a vidos about the Tochka-U launches, obviously not in the steppes of Donbas.

                      Beautifully run. Well, Arabs love light and noise effects, shooting in the air at weddings, launching firecrackers, etc. By the way, at least one hit was recorded?

                      Quote: Papakiko
                      The dead and wounded also remembered that the Patriot had 10000% protection against the ancient Scuds.

                      Not killed and wounded, but killed (one) and wounded. From kasamov and even more damage was.

                      Quote: Papakiko
                      Question to Herr Professor: How have several ancient missiles been able to inflict such injuries? and why is the courageous people of Israel so weak in heart?

                      Only 9000 apartments were not destroyed, but damaged. This includes apartments where at least one window glass cracked. 10 people (the kingdom to them heaven) died of heart attacks ... Hmm ... And on a normal day, how many die? And in Moscow per day, how many people die from heart attacks? Maybe Moscow is being bombed? wink
                      1. +4
                        31 August 2015 19: 49
                        Rub your fellow citizens about cracked glass; we don’t need to be kept for idiots. And at the expense of the best world weapons, you and your colleagues are constantly trying to push them here.
                        The fact remains that when you saw a photo of officers of the Yugoslav army behind the s-300 control panel, which was made in Russia by Shurygin in order to misinform, they delayed the start of the bombing of Belgrade for several months. But we know that they just had to ask the professor and he would quickly explain that the S-300 is bullshit and you can’t postpone the start of the operation, right?
                      2. -2
                        31 August 2015 19: 55
                        Quote: yushch
                        Rub your fellow citizens about cracked glass; we don’t need to be kept for idiots.

                        My fellow citizens know what the destruction of 9000 apartments in Gush Dan is and what it would look like. They also know what Mas Rehush is and how he defines the "affected" apartment. I can arrange an educational program for you.

                        Quote: yushch
                        The fact remains

                        The fact of what? That the Patriot has experience in combat use, but the S-300 does not? Or the fact that the Shell is not able to bring down the Scud?
                      3. +1
                        31 August 2015 22: 51
                        The fact that even without the combat use of the s-300 forced the mattresses to postpone the start of the bombing of Yugoslavia by almost half a year, to completely change the plans and tactics of the use of NATO aviation. Well, how your praised Pytriots work is visible in YouTube and I will tell you from such hits on buildings with one cracked glass and wounded just does not cost.
                      4. -1
                        1 September 2015 06: 49
                        Quote: yushch
                        The fact that even without the combat use of the s-300 forced the mattresses to postpone the start of the bombing of Yugoslavia by almost half a year, to completely change the plans and tactics of the use of NATO aviation. Well, how your praised Pytriots work is visible in YouTube and I will tell you from such hits on buildings with one cracked glass and wounded just does not cost.

                        About Yugoslavia these are fairy tales and conjectures. How do the praised Patriots work, you ask the Syrians, he will be told. But no one can tell us how the Shell works, and even more so having no taxes in the S-300 world. They have no experience in combat use.
                        As for the cracked glass and the "wounded" - no gagging is necessary. If you do not know then do not meddle. hi
                      5. +2
                        31 August 2015 19: 53
                        Quote: professor
                        Only 9000 apartments were not destroyed, but damaged. This includes apartments where at least one window glass cracked.

                        Here is the "Temporal Paradox" with your citizens and free media.
                        Glass crack-This is a destroyed apartment! (We see the fact of excessive damage)
                        Not killed and wounded, but killed (one) and wounded-There we see an enchanting understatement of losses. But they could have written that they suffocated in a public place, from heroically restrained, their own gases.
                        A person would be immortalized at once, as a hero of a nation.
                        Such here they are free media of democracy.
                        Cemetery. The inscription on the monument - "Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Rabinovich".
                        Visitors - to strict: "What kind of an unknown soldier - if known -
                        that he is Rabinovich? "
                        Watchman: - "That Rabinovich is known, it is not known whether Rabinovich was a soldier" (As a soldier Rabinovich is not known)
                        However, as well as having no taxes in the world of S-300.
                        I wrote to you about: delirium from Wikipedia and "porridge" from your head.
                        Make you come back.
                        An article about boots and skis, and you have flippers and wigs and roofs made of palm leaf and contraceptives.
                        It's bad in your "barn", the roof is completely leaky.
                      6. 0
                        31 August 2015 19: 58
                        Quote: Papakiko
                        Here is the "Temporal Paradox" with your citizens and free media.
                        Crack on the glass - This is a destroyed apartment! (We see the fact of excessive damage)

                        Most likely translation costs. There were not and could not be 9000 destroyed apartments with one dead.

                        Quote: Papakiko
                        Not killed and the wounded, but killed (one) and the wounded-Here we see the enchanting understatement of losses. But they could have written that they suffocated in a public place, from heroically restrained, their own gases.

                        Of course. Israel always understates its losses. So? only now where does the bodies and relatives do not understand. request
                      7. +1
                        1 September 2015 05: 30
                        Beautifully run. Well, Arabs love light and noise effects, shooting in the air at weddings, launching firecrackers, etc. By the way, at least one hit was recorded?
                        Well, then yes and more than once
                        However, according to French and Iranian sources, in fact, on June 6, 2015, Hussite rebels managed to launch 12 Scud missiles in Saudi Arabia, only three of which were shot down by air defense, and the rest either hit targets or fell into uninhabited areas; moreover, during this operation, the chief of the main headquarters of the Saudi Arabian Air Force Mohammed al-Shaalan was allegedly killed
                        you doubt the French sources.
                      8. 0
                        1 September 2015 06: 51
                        Quote: Sergei1982
                        you doubt the French sources.

                2. +2
                  31 August 2015 16: 34
                  Quote: yushch
                  Scud warhead to leave the solid zone of destruction of your ancients

                  Komrad, this missile from the 9K72 Elbrus complex is not separable, and fly to the target the second stage with a warhead at the tip.
                  And if the BB was shared, then the indicators of the “Patriot” went to the minus altogether.

                  Based on the experience gained, the mattress and arrogant Saxons accelerated the development of the preventive complex as much as possible, calling this case PROY.
                  Quote: professor
                  The Israeli electorate has personally seen how the ancient Patriots bring down the Scuds.

                  Yes, we believe and applaud.
                  The dead and wounded also remembered that the Patriot had 10000% protection against the ancient Scuds.
                  Separately, I note the loss of Israel in 1991: more than 9000 apartments were destroyed, one person was killed, 10 died from heart attacks during the air raid announcement, 300 people were slightly injured.

                  Question to Herr Professor: How have several ancient missiles been able to inflict such injuries? and why is the courageous people of Israel so weak in heart?
                  1. 0
                    31 August 2015 17: 47
                    I agree with you. During the interception, the Patriot destroyed mainly the second stage, while the warhead just managed to slip through the continuous zone of destruction and broke through to the ground.
      5. +3
        31 August 2015 09: 54
        In general, it is not clear to me how to combine Western and Russian equipment in the Air Force. After all, completely different standards
        1. +2
          31 August 2015 10: 51
          Quote: anokem
          In general, it is not clear to me how to combine Western and Russian equipment in the Air Force. After all, completely different standards
          - apparently learned from the Indians ...
        2. +1
          31 August 2015 11: 01
          Quote: anokem
          In general, it is not clear to me how to combine Western and Russian equipment in the Air Force. After all, completely different standards

          It is necessary to ask the Indians, they have rich experience.
      6. +9
        31 August 2015 09: 56
        Quote: professor
        Against whom can they work in Yemen?
        Arabs, then against carpet carpets? laughing
      7. +2
        31 August 2015 10: 22
        Quote: professor
        Against whom can they work in Yemen?

        What if there are international civil aviation routes there?)
      8. +1
        31 August 2015 11: 21
        Let them practice in their own way.
      9. 0
        31 August 2015 13: 19
        Quote: professor
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        It would be interesting to learn about the real work of the system.

        Against whom can they work in Yemen?

        Oleg, no one is bombing Yemen? request
        1. -4
          31 August 2015 14: 20
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Oleg, no one is bombing Yemen?

          They will shoot down their allies? request
      10. +1
        31 August 2015 18: 05
        Quote: professor
        Against whom can they work in Yemen?

        In addition to the Iranian Air Force (transporters, if any) supporting the Hussites, nothing more comes to mind.
    2. +4
      31 August 2015 09: 44
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      It would be interesting to learn about the real work of the system.

      We need to start with the fact that our design bureau designed this complex according to the technical characteristics of the Arabs, paid for them in advance (!) And completed the order (and the money was very serious).
      Our experts are always there: the complex is under warranty, minor malfunctions should be corrected immediately by the manufacturer, it is necessary to train the calculations and someone should do it ... so we will know everything soon.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. +1
    31 August 2015 09: 37
    Arabs are slowly being drawn into the war. Soon they will line up for weapons.
    1. +3
      31 August 2015 09: 43
      Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin
      Arabs are slowly being drawn into the war. Soon they will line up for weapons.

      Those Arabs are usually purchased at an American military.
      1. +9
        31 August 2015 10: 06
        ..... Those arbs are usually purchased at an American military ....

        .... Looks like there weren’t the necessary devices in that Voentorg .... lol
      2. +1
        31 August 2015 11: 01
        In American - not American ... The price of oil will skyrocket, if it does. Of course, it will pull the ruble up after itself. But, I think, the price of our devices will still be of interest to the Arabs. So, the employees of our Government can score for import substitution in this situation - this is already a problem.
  3. +3
    31 August 2015 09: 39
    Practice shows that when someone else controls our equipment .... it does not work 100% ... the exception will probably be Vietnam
    1. +1
      31 August 2015 09: 53
      Air Force Captain SU Today, 09:39 AM New
      Practice shows that when someone else controls our equipment .... it does not work 100% ... the exception will probably be Vietnam

      That's right ... otherwise it cannot be. But we cannot deliver to whom our exact analogs ... Export options are different from those that are in service with us ... HOW AS THE FREQUENCY OF RADIATION (and these are other, not the most efficient frequencies, generators ... waveguides, etc. e.) ... SUCH AS TO SOME DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS ... WORK PROGRAM ALGORITHMS ...
      And in Yemen, these complexes are more likely for "moral support of pants" and precision work of guns on ground targets ...
  4. +6
    31 August 2015 09: 39
    .... Normal such a device ....



    Along with long-range and medium-range air defense systems (S-300, Patriot, Buk, Hot), short-range systems (Tunguska, Roland, Krotal, etc.) were widely used. ) designed to protect troops on the march, the defense of a large number of important small-sized objects and CP, as well as to combat low-flying targets, including unmanned aerial projectiles and reconnaissance aircraft.
    The new domestic universal short-range complex “Pantsir-C1” was developed by the Tula Instrument Design Bureau. It consists of a combat vehicle (up to six BM in a battery), anti-aircraft guided missiles, 30-mm guns and a transport-loading vehicle (one TZM for two BM). Combined missile-cannon armament allows the "Shell" to create a continuous destruction zone at a distance of up to 20 km and a height of up to 10 km.

    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      31 August 2015 10: 42
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Combined missile-cannon armament allows the "Shell" to create a continuous destruction zone at a distance of up to 20 km and a height of up to 10 km.

      And what is the coefficient? hitting a target, cannons, when flying? 0,3?
      hydrox (2): Design Bureau designed this complex on the characteristics of the Arabs.
      hydrox(2), can not clarify? (at least in an academic setting).
      1. 0
        31 August 2015 15: 12
        Quote: mervino2007
        And what is the coefficient? hitting a target, cannons, when flying? 0,3?

        Tunguska M1 0,6 - the shell should be slightly higher (at a speed of no more than Mach 0,6), especially since the guns do not hit the target, but make a fire barrier, for the target there are missiles.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. gjv
          0
          31 August 2015 15: 48
          Quote: PSih2097
          Tunguska M1 0,6 - the shell should be slightly higher

          Manufacturer - KBP - provides such information.
          The missile provides target destruction with an EPR of 0,1-0,3 meters at a range of 20 km and effective destruction of all types of promising air attack weapons, primarily high-precision weapons with flight speeds of up to 1000 m / s and a minimum effective reflective surface (EOP) of 0,03, 0,06 - 0,7 m² with a probability of at least XNUMX by one rocket.
  5. +3
    31 August 2015 09: 43
    Interesting. Whom they were going to bring down in the territory of Yemen.
    1. +4
      31 August 2015 10: 08
      OTRK, UAV small both artisanal and Iranian. Just show off.

      Here in Marib (where the whole fist is concentrated) at night something puffed out.
  6. +3
    31 August 2015 09: 51
    Iran is unlikely to be glad that its air forces are now being held in hangars by Russian air defense missile systems ..
    1. +2
      31 August 2015 10: 06
      Iran will even fly to Yemen with big problems, and it does not fly there. And he goes smuggling to the last Hussite port.
      1. 0
        31 August 2015 15: 17
        Well, the presence of hostile air defense forces in Yemen initially rejects the possibility of helping the Hausites in the event of a worsening situation. What reduces the political weight and strength of Iran in the region
  7. +1
    31 August 2015 09: 54
    and in what year did they receive them? and cho, never shot?
  8. +1
    31 August 2015 10: 15
    If the equipment is purchased, it means it will be used! But somehow this is another question! maybe a banal rearrangement, or maybe not.
  9. +1
    31 August 2015 10: 37
    Quote: starshina pv
    and cho, never shot?

    Well, training shots were for sure.
    And by and large, they acquire such weapons as intimidation, so as not to shoot at all. laughing
  10. 0
    31 August 2015 10: 44
    Yemen is fighting in the interests of Russia. Saudi Arabia is trying to play a double game - both yours and ours. They offered to invest in Russia, but they are fighting against Yemen, as part of a coalition. But they also asked Ikander to sell them ... True, there was a refusal on our part.
  11. 0
    31 August 2015 10: 51
    Quote: lunoxod
    Interesting. Whom they were going to bring down in the territory of Yemen.


    It is visible camels began to fly.
  12. -2
    31 August 2015 10: 57
    This is one example when good equipment is sold anywhere and to anyone, I won’t be surprised if they (Armor) are captured or destroyed, the same is in Iraq, how strange is the policy in itself, and the supply of weapons by themselves, but when it’s all "charm" will start shooting at civilian planes, then it will come to someone at the top, that not everything in this world is measured by money
  13. +1
    31 August 2015 11: 07
    Along the way, a certain number of "tomahawks" with launchers disappeared from the Americans. Otherwise, with all the strain of my brain I cannot understand what these "shells" are doing there. winked
    1. +2
      31 August 2015 11: 19
      Yemen has OTRK "Tochka-U", "Elbrus" So there is something to be afraid of.
  14. 0
    31 August 2015 11: 29
    Quote: 31rus
    This is one example when good equipment is sold anywhere and to anyone, I won’t be surprised if they (Armor) are captured or destroyed, the same is in Iraq, how strange is the policy in itself, and the supply of weapons by themselves, but when it’s all "charm" will start shooting at civilian planes, then it will come to someone at the top, that not everything in this world is measured by money

    Destroy - not scary, this is the problem of the Arabs, the money is paid.
    Worse if they really capture and use it against civilians, on the other hand they will not take it from us, they will find where else to take it, and the money will go to another state.
    Another thing is straining - the Americans will be able to "dig" into the device. This is the problem!
  15. 0
    31 August 2015 16: 44
    and a beautiful machine !!! any chassis for your money !!
  16. 0
    31 August 2015 18: 45
    "Against whom can they work in Yemen?"
    Who cares? The main thing is that there should be orders and money dripped into our defense industry. laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"