In Russian media, there are major changes.

In Russian media, there are major changes.



Bad news - the financing of the site "However" was discontinued, the editors of which went on indefinite leave. First, the magazine closed, now here is the site. No matter how anyone treats the left list in editorial policy and individual authors, the project itself is extremely worthy and important for the patriotic segment of the media. In fact, the only one so serious (thanks to the participation of Leontiev) and at the same time frankly anti-liberal. Was the only one. Now there is no him either - even though they have not physically closed it, and from time to time texts appear.

In general, the situation in the media is alarming - one gets the feeling that the financing crisis is beating mostly on illiberal media and personnel, while the liberal ones are getting out of the way. And this is at a time when Russia, in the conditions of a tough information confrontation with the West, needs a qualitative breakthrough in creating a sovereign information environment.

Yes, Timchenko was expelled from Lenta.ru and together with her her team of Russophobes. Yes, it’s hard for Novaya Gazeta and other NewTimes. Slightly blocked the oxygen "Rain" and try to smoke out with the "Echo" Venediktov. Liberal journalists who hate Putin constantly complain that they are being squeezed out and do not allow them to breathe, and the information policy of federal channels is recognized by the West as the main reason that the Maidan in Russia has no chance.

But there is a reverse trend. Closing "However," only one of its manifestations.
For example, Kommersant - since 2013, when the head of the publication appointed a state official who worked in the media of the ROC and the Ministry of Defense, to this day failed to change the information policy of this militant list of liberals: the power is terrible, the West is well done, it's time to bring out of Russia. The same can be said about Minkin with his yellow combat leaflet "MK", ​​in which pimps continue to advertise prostitutes, and journalists continue to be Snuffles, as in the country everything is bad because of the Crimea. Many publications seem to have recoloured in moderate criticism, but in fact remain liberal to the bone and are ready to meet Navalny with hugs at any time.

The TASS news agency, which was planned to revive under the old Soviet-imperial brand and make it one of the main levers of the Kremlin’s information policy, was turned into a place of salvation for top personnel from Kommersant and RIA Novosti Mironyuk. While the long-standing tassovtsy, not only the elderly, have undergone a total reduction and squeezing. After 3, it can be stated that the policy of general director S. Mikhailov, who had previously worked closely with Russian Railways Yakunin, is at least inconsistent. I do not speak more categorically, because although I worked in TASS, I do not have accurate information.

At the same time, the agency "Russia Today", having announced the alleged liquidation of RIA Novosti, is in no hurry to remove this brand. Yes, and meaningful changes are not as large-scale and unambiguous as we would like. Even Margaret Simonyan’s “Rush Tudey” is not as impressive as before - there are few new Russian-language products, armor-piercing information projectiles, the fuse has disappeared somewhere. The feeling that all the forces of the holding went to the creation of a network of international broadcasting "Sputnik", which, of course, is important, but not enough.

It is clear that in one sitting the situation in the media cannot be changed, no matter how much the authorities and the people would like - it is trivially not enough new personnel not brought up in the spirit of liberalism. But at the same time, it is impossible not to see that the media are sabotaging the Kremlin’s intentions to nationalize the information space on the part of top managers and editors brought up in the era of “beautiful 90's” and still hate power. They use their connections and slaughter all the central places of the rapidly narrowing information market, while new cadres who could qualitatively change the modern Russian media cannot even exist on the Internet site like "However."

I am sure that the Kremlin sees this state of affairs and is dissatisfied with it, which means that in the near future we can expect more radical and frank transformations in the media.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. sem-yak 31 August 2015 06: 26 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    I'd like to say! But moderators will not miss this text!
    1. Andrey Yuryevich 31 August 2015 06: 40 New
      • 31
      • 0
      +31
      at least "house-2" would not be closed, but where else is our youth learning the "right" intergender relations (relations) ??? wassatand if you think about it, are there NON-liberal media at all? (Well, apart from the STAR channel, I can’t remember more than that)
      1. inkass_98 31 August 2015 06: 59 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        even if the "house-2" is not closed

        Yes, "House-2" is our everything. Are they purely alive in the light of the coveted tgavli Ksyushadi? Somehow I lost sight of their intense sex life laughing .
        But the situation with “However,” is alarming, a very sensible resource, and literate people were published there. Is Leontiev unable to persuade his amiable Rosneft to cooperate? And it would be all happiness, and the oil industry - additional advertising.
        1. Talgat 31 August 2015 09: 26 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: inkass_98
          Is Leontiev unable to persuade his amiable Rosneft to cooperate?

          Here it is - Rosneft, by virtue of its position and role in the political situation in Russia, is simply obliged to allocate money for projects like However. I hope Leontiev will explain this to them.
          1. jjj
            jjj 31 August 2015 13: 58 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Friends, Leontiev was attached successfully. The need for "However," has disappeared. As a result, the project is quiet. These are natural processes. But the existence of liberal media, in my unenlightened view, is based on other people's financial programs. But if you look at how many "conscientious" authors are now broadcasting from behind the hillock, then you can understand that in the liberal camp, the gesheft are running out
            1. rosarioagro 31 August 2015 17: 56 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: jjj
              Leontiev was attached successfully. The need for "However," has disappeared.

              You can look at it from a slightly different angle - Leontiev was made an offer that he could not refuse, and therefore the resource is in this position today, the question is to whom is it beneficial?
            2. Karabin 31 August 2015 20: 51 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: jjj
              But the existence of liberal media, in my unenlightened view, is based on other people's financial programs.

              For example, "Echo" on the finances of Gazprom. wink
        2. 97110 31 August 2015 11: 11 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: inkass_98
          Is Leontiev unable to persuade his amiable Rosneft to cooperate?

          Duc barrel then fell. Lower costs should be.
        3. NordUral 31 August 2015 14: 44 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          But Sechin himself is not a liberalist?
      2. afdjhbn67 31 August 2015 07: 02 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        And REN TV with Prokopenko .. offended however .. laughing
      3. varov14 31 August 2015 08: 12 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Power, it means to own, therefore, all media are under power. If the media carry out anti-Russian propaganda, then the power is anti-Russian and must be demolished. And the bearers of this ideology (and the ideology exists and has not disappeared anywhere) should be withdrawn from circulation.
      4. CALL. 31 August 2015 12: 11 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        Well, except for the STAR channel, I can’t remember more than that

        And what to call the broadcast on this channel "Burnt by Conscience 2, 3". The fact that dramatic changes have ripened in the media over the past 20 years. And things are there.
      5. Serafim-k 31 August 2015 14: 44 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Well, of course, sitting on two chairs is not convenient ..
    2. varov14 31 August 2015 07: 36 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And why not say “you want to make a pleasant present, give money” - that’s all that the population can move to power. Money, money, money, there is no mind for more, when they have passed a law allowing them to be printed on a printer.
    3. Oper6300 31 August 2015 12: 01 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Great news. Still, the author of the article is free, then he will see the difference between the oligarchy and the country.
    4. sherp2015 31 August 2015 12: 57 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: sem-yak
      I'd like to say! But moderators will not miss this text!


      I must say anyway !!
      The Russian media are 90% liberal in essence, just quieted down for a while.
      Remember the role of the press during the Chechen companies, when they poured mud and interfered with the army, soldiers, and especially military officers.
      I suppose that in the event of an emergency, they (the media) will show their true face with an animal grin ...
  2. populist 31 August 2015 06: 35 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    I am sure that the Kremlin sees this state of affairs and is dissatisfied with it, which means that in the near future we can expect more radical and frank transformations in the media.
    Author russkiy_malchik

    I would like to hope for such "radical transformations", but there was already enough time for these transformations, but few changes. It is necessary to change the figures above the media and the whole government in addition.
    1. vlade99 31 August 2015 08: 33 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: populist
      It is necessary to change the figures above the media and the whole government in addition

      So the government is entirely liberals. Why should they be sad? And I don’t think that the government has anything to do with it.
      1. Gorinich 31 August 2015 10: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The current "elite" is much more afraid of left bank in the country than defeat from the Westerners. Compradors will sell everything and everyone if only their business is intact. Therefore, while I do not see an alternative, the same mess awaits us as in Ukraine.
  3. rotmistr60 31 August 2015 06: 41 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    the financial crisis hits mainly illiberal media and human resources, while liberal ones get out of the way

    As if the representatives of the liberal press did not try to show that they were being persecuted, they were forbidden, etc., but today they really feel great. At the same time, they are conducting outright anti-Russian propaganda and, frankly speaking, they are carrying out ideological sabotage. And here the attitude of state structures towards this is not clear. If this desire is to show the West that we have freedom of speech, then this desire goes sideways to the state itself. If this is done intentionally for the direct support of these media, then this is already wrecking. So, everyone thinks the way he wants, and at this time the state loses on the information front.
  4. afdjhbn67 31 August 2015 06: 48 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Not later than today I read how liberals mourn on Maksimovskaya on REN TV ... the truth is somewhere nearby (F.Malder) with regards to Leontyev, he was pretty fed up "however" I won’t be surprised if instead of Peskov pops up somewhere in November .. ( wang)
    1. afdjhbn67 31 August 2015 07: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I re-read my comment and just do not understand who minus the liberals or patriots .. wassat
      1. 97110 31 August 2015 11: 15 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: afdjhbn67
        and definitely not understand

        Duc and minus, you see, also do not understand
        Quote: afdjhbn67
        with regards to Leontiev, he pretty fed up "however"
  5. olimpiada15 31 August 2015 06: 58 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    "The information policy of federal channels is recognized by the West as the main reason that the Maidan in Russia is not successful"
    As the West does not want to admit that the matter is not primarily in information policy, but in the atrocities committed by the West around the world, the terrible consequences of their interference policy and how not to bring it to the media, the picture still becomes obvious.
    The West has ceased to be an icon of civilized life and it is a pity that it does not understand this.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Doctor Savage 31 August 2015 07: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "But from their degradation - a deliverance for the uninhabited. So as not to relax"

    Romans 11:11
  8. olimpiada15 31 August 2015 08: 29 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    Fundamental changes have really matured in Russian media.
    A person is not a dragon with many heads, each person has one head and information in this head should be laid out clearly, clearly and logically.
    In Soviet times, in most territories only radio and only one program were available. So this program contributed to the correct formation of personality. Everything was there - classical, modern music, folk songs, modern, performances, children's programs.
    Personally, I am grateful to that radio - thanks to him, I not only knew that a person should be smart, strong, honest, I knew and loved songs of that time and folk, classical music, works of writers. This radio opened a huge world - the romance of the conquerors of Siberia and the bitterness of loss, the romance of the sea, the lace of Chopin’s music and Beethoven’s sonatas, the charm of Brahms’s music. The whole huge and beautiful world was opened by these programs, a world in which one wanted to live, which had to be seen and cognized. And most importantly, there was no lie, but they did not say, but did not lie.
    Now the media information is the contents of a garbage bin: scraps, fragments, pieces of delicious and foul-smelling, now a modern person, including a TV, is immersed in this bucket.
    The program "However" is a pity, for the sake of it could turn on the TV.
    The state generally refused to regulate information in the country, and this is very bad. Throughout the country, there must be at least one television and radio channel that provides the population with quality truthful information.
    A year ago, I was faced with the fact that in our city you can hear only one Echo of Moscow radio and its point of view, which called the inhabitants of Donbass terrorists, which I could not listen to, because I knew what Bandera people are and what the people of Donbass can expect from the authorities, for whom the fascist henchman is a model and hero. And everything, a different point of view is simply not available, yes there are many channels, but they are all musical and depraved-entertaining, of which only Sport FM, the channel is good, but not for me.
    The state is obliged to find means to maintain at least one channel, where there will be reliable information, high-quality educational programs, films of artistic value, in general, not only experts advised this channel, but also psychologists, so that there would be order in the head of people, not a copy garbage bins, at least those who want to receive quality information, were able to get it.
    And then for today there is one high-quality informational radio channel, Echo of Moscow, they have really high-quality information transmitted, it's nice to listen to it, the only question is what they say.
  9. EvgNik 31 August 2015 08: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "" Liberal journalists who hate Putin constantly complain that they are being squeezed out and not allowed to breathe. ""
    More could not write anything.
  10. Million 31 August 2015 08: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The electorate needs bread and circuses, so House 2 and other gums will never be closed by clubs. And the government does not need thinking people
  11. akudr48 31 August 2015 08: 51 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The authorities are preparing for a tough twist of all those who are dissatisfied, which after a financial and economic collapse will appear in a multitude.

    All the talk about some patriotic media that is about to be created, and new faces on TV is all for the public. Information supervisors at the crossing do not change.

    Here and about Donbass somehow quietly and fell silent, all these even empty talkers for Novorossia disappeared somewhere.

    It is terrible to keep silent and severely move eyebrows especially before the impending tsunami - this is a trademark of the Russian authorities.

    Echo of Moscow will tell you about the rest.
  12. shelva 31 August 2015 09: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    No media can pull the West out of the same ... in which it will soon find itself, thanks to the Americans.
  13. Hort 31 August 2015 10: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    this is all wrong, liberal media should not be strangled, but a little tail should be pressed so that they do not bury too much. If you start the "rain" and other things like blocking the oxygen - this can cause people's interest purely out of a craving for the forbidden, on the principle of "prohibit - it means the truth is told."
    Yes, and in general, democracy and freedom of speech. So, following the Constitution, we need to develop a patriotic branch of the media, and in addition to it, also a neutral one, without a pronounced bias towards the opposition or the authorities.
    And then the yapping of all these liberal ghouls simply will not be heard
  14. Uncle Joe 31 August 2015 10: 50 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    No matter who to the left (?!) roll in editorial policy and to individual authors, the project itself is extremely worthy and important for patriotic (?!) media segment. In fact, the only one serious (?!) (thanks to the participation of Leontyev (?!)) and frankly anti-liberal (?!).
    Analytical program ?! However... what


    Mikhail Vladimirovich Leontiev was born on October 12, 1958 in Moscow into a Russian-Jewish family. Father - aircraft engineer Vladimir Yakovlevich Leontyev, mother - professor of statistics at the Moscow Institute of National Economy named after Plekhanova, co-author of the textbook "Trade Statistics" Mira Moiseevna Leontyeva.

    In 1987, Leontiev began writing analytical articles on sociological topics. In 1989, at the invitation of a friend, he came to the Experimental Creative Center, headed by Sergei Kurginyan, who was engaged in political science.

    In 1993, he became the first deputy editor-in-chief of the weekly Business MN. In the same year, he co-founded the newspaper Segodnya, sponsored by Leonid Nevzlin, Vladimir Gusinsky and Alexander Smolensky.

    In 1997, Leontyev became the founder of the Delo magazine, which was funded by Mikhail Khodorkovskybut did not go to print.

    In the 2000 presidential election, he expressed support for the acting head of state, Vladimir Putin. In 2001, he became a member of the political council of the socio-political movement Eurasia, headed by Alexander Dugin. In 2002 he became a member of the United Russia party..

    In his own words, he was a "dissident." Names himself right conservative.

    At the beginning of his journalistic and journalistic career adhered to radical liberal views, primarily in the field of economics, which predetermined his opposition to the communists in the 1996 elections and to the government headed by E. M. Primakov in the late 1990s

    Criticized left ideology: “Miserable attempts to build communism out of the sandbox are disgusting. And their economic consequences are global. Already no one believes in anything. In general, no one and nothing at all. Obviously, market reforms in Russia have failed. The market is not suitable for Russia. Russia is a wretched, terrible country, separate from the entire population of homo sapiens, which can exist only in some senile, isolationist - necessarily in a zoo - conditions. All these meaningless and insane compromises, all these handouts to socialism and populism, which are extremely expensive for a sick economy, must be discarded. The way out is normal liberal development.»(Wiki)
    1. Hort 31 August 2015 14: 04 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      in, otherwise they found a patriot
    2. Vladimir Pozlnyakov 31 August 2015 19: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I looked at this mug, it seemed that it was Shenderovich! And he is “Mira Moiseevich” and everything fell into place!
  15. Vasisualiy 31 August 2015 13: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    What a pop, such a coming. I’m not talking about the country, I’m talking about power ...
  16. NordUral 31 August 2015 14: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    If in fact liberals are in power, then what kind of national media can be expected from them. First of all, it is necessary to understand, and finally, with those liberalists who rule the country.
  17. Brigadier 31 August 2015 15: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Yeah ... We still have too many liberal-amero-oriented publications fueled from abroad! And our authorities, it seems, let this matter go by chance, and will catch up, as usual, only when the rooster pecks! And, as usual, then it will be too late ... Vova! Dimon! Well, do not sleep! Give these jackals hand and mouth! You are power! You can do it! Do not wait until the last, when the people themselves will begin to crush these creatures !!! Act finally !!! And we will ALWAYS support you !!! soldier
  18. chelovektapok 31 August 2015 17: 11 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Journalism is a MARKET, more marketable than the "first profession." Well, they will not earn, there will be those. We have on the "betonka" also the girls often change depending on the "roof". Who pays attention to them? FUNCTION will be performed by those who pay. They won’t change for others. The law of the market! A common thing ... It is insulting to the graying circulation old women when the young, playful crowd. People with young people are more interesting!
  19. Vladimir Vasilich 31 August 2015 17: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    “However,” it’s time to change the main showmen, starting from Channel 1 ...
  20. Indifferent 31 August 2015 18: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Whatever the Kremlin sees, but no one will change anything! I judge this by indirect news. Well, for example, about the situation with the same Vasilyeva. What, the Kremlin does not know about this? He knows perfectly, but is silent! Although the whole country stood on its ears.
    The same can be said about the situation in Buryatia. Huge fires cannot be stopped. Ordinary people with the Ministry of Emergencies were already exhausted, and oblast officials drove off on vacation. They wanted to spit on the people, although they get salaries from the pocket of that very people.
    The same is in Ussuriysk. Flooded the city, no warnings were given. No operational solutions. Ruined animals in the zoo. People stood in the water for hours without getting any help. Where is all this bureaucracy, which is obliged at this time to be with the people and help all that is possible. Even vehicles with cranes were not isolated so that cages with animals could be taken out to a dry place.
    The switchman will certainly be found and even put in jail. And of course they will be the director of the zoo, which does not have cars, not like cranes.
    The same thing will happen with the media! Funded from behind the Bugr will remain and continue subversive activities. And everything else will be quietly bent.
    And I don’t really think that officials directly sabotage everything. I am sure the whole thing is laziness and unprofessionalism. Indifferent to everything that passes around them. They know exactly what would happen and from the prison they will smear (like Vasiliev) and they will find a position!
  21. dropout 31 August 2015 20: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Uncle Joe
    At the beginning of his journalistic and journalistic career, he adhered to radical liberal views, primarily in the field of economics,

    He who does not change does not live.
    The current views and speeches of "however the boss" are anti-liberal and patriotic.
  22. Karabin 31 August 2015 20: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The TASS news agency, which was planned to be revived under the old Soviet-imperial brand and made of it one of the main levers of the Kremlin’s information policy,

    Why would it suddenly not be for the Soviet and the imperial Kremlin to object to TASS under the old brand?
    I’m sure the Kremlin sees this state of affairs and is unhappy with it,
    So there will be more “Let them talk”, “Russian sensations” and “secrets” with Chapman.
  23. Karabin 31 August 2015 21: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In general, the situation in the media is alarming - it seems that the financing crisis is mainly affecting illiberal media and personnel, while the liberal ones are being pulled out
    The author simplifies everything. Liberal media are those who are against Putin, illiberal, who are for. It remains for Putin to decide who he is.
  24. Prisoner 31 August 2015 22: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is time to stop flirting and bring down this liberal riffraff, so that they themselves voluntarily and with great joy dump the foreigners to their breadwinners.
  25. eyed 1 September 2015 05: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    For a long time, the media and TV have been dominated by citizens of a certain nationality, let us call them Russians ... But they have corporativism, solidarity and interchangeability. There are two artificial flanks - no center. And they pour the same thing and in the same way, presenting as if presenting different bumps of vision.
    I don’t know how Wasserman flew (?) From the clip, but the rest of the “media faces” are players of the same field. Something really looks like a bad situation in St. Petersburg in 1917 .... Well, I'm joking, I'm joking ....
  26. Coboklo 1 September 2015 05: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the past six months, Michael has become an average, not standing out from the host of other journalists. The television excerpts look bland and uninteresting.
    Let him try to compete for a place in the sun on his own.
    Selected - honor and respect !.
  27. Mentat 2 September 2015 16: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Andrew Y.
    at least "house-2" would not be closed, but where else is our youth learning the "right" intergender relations (relations) ??? wassatand if you think about it, are there NON-liberal media at all? (Well, apart from the STAR channel, I can’t remember more than that)

    There is. All news agencies, not as a means of chewing snot, but which work precisely as sources of information - ITAR TASS, RIA Novosti (continues to work), Regnum, Interfax. In addition to these giants, there are many quite restrained in the presentation of material publications. It’s just that liberal newsagents stink badly, so it’s a good idea.