German diplomat: George Bush did not rule out the possibility of a nuclear strike in response to the September 11 attacks

51
After the September 11 terrorist attacks on 2001 on the twin towers of the World Trade Center (MTC) in New York, the administration of then-President George W. Bush did not rule out a nuclear strike on Afghanistan, where at that time the terrorist number one was supposed to be Bin Laden, The ex-Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Schroeder Michael Steiner told the correspondent of the Spiegel edition. His words are quoted RIA News.



To the question “whether the United States considered the possibility of a nuclear strike,” Steiner replied: “Documents were prepared. They really went through all the options. ”

According to him, the German government "at that moment seriously feared that the US reaction would indeed be excessive because of the shock suffered."

The agency recalls that the attacks in New York were committed by Al-Qaeda representatives with the help of hijacked passenger planes that were directed at the MTC buildings. As a result, about 3 thousand people died.
  • Spencer Platt / Getty Images
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    30 August 2015 08: 29
    The Yankees can! They’re big children, and they shove someone’s vigorous bomb like two fingers on the asphalt! Without thinking about the consequences! Especially if you know for sure that there will be no answer!
    1. +5
      30 August 2015 08: 45
      Yes, their "American friends" have extensive experience in using nuclear weapons in peaceful cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so they will teach.
      1. +2
        30 August 2015 08: 53
        Let’s bombard these hoopoes, the whole world - to dust with excitement! So, God forbid, there will be some (of which they have everything) and will press the red button, without presenting the consequences!
        1. SSR
          0
          30 August 2015 13: 09
          Quote: Baikonur
          Let’s bombard these hoopoes, the whole world - to dust with excitement! So, God forbid, there will be some (of which they have everything) and will press the red button, without presenting the consequences!

          It’s also a pity that the authors don’t talk about how many more people died in the so-called retaliation against terrorist number one ......
          Rotten American politics under the patronage of ****** s for which all other people are just working material.
      2. +6
        30 August 2015 08: 56
        After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the twin towers of the World Trade Center (MTC) in New York, then-President George W. Bush’s administration did not rule out a nuclear strike against Afghanistan, where at that time there was allegedly the number one terrorist, Bin Laden

        Why Afghanistan and not Washington? - Then two problems would be solved at once: Bin Laden would be satisfied, and the hornet's nest would cease to exist.
      3. 0
        30 August 2015 09: 59
        So the insane must be swaddled! What if he is dreaming? Someone from the establishment there was already jumping out of the window. What if reactive relapse? And a little suitcase nearby ......
      4. 0
        30 August 2015 20: 01
        And the Japanese lick their ass for it, and still do not say out loud whose fault it is. And the Japanese seriously think that it was a Russian bomb.
    2. +6
      30 August 2015 11: 45
      I advise everyone to watch the investigations of Italian journalists.

      1. +4
        30 August 2015 21: 03
        Sergey, I fully support!
        Watch from 37 minutes.
    3. 0
      30 August 2015 19: 59
      They are cowards, if only they knew the answer was possible, then another question. And since they are cowardly jackals, they’re weak in melee. And the Ukrainians taught such tactics, and they smash the population and smash. And they will take us prisoner, Shoot the bottles. Shame and curse on jackals.
  2. +8
    30 August 2015 08: 31
    Aluminum airplane fuselages pierced the double steel beams of the skyscraper structure ... this is a terrorist attack so a terrorist attack !!

    And Afghanistan - in general, erase everything with nuclear strikes! To fundamentally solve the problem.
    1. +4
      30 August 2015 08: 35
      Still, something was planned under this "terrorist attack". Maybe when we'll find out. While a dark matter and only "oddities" without answers.
    2. 0
      30 August 2015 08: 45
      the meaning of these "terrorist attacks" is the introduction of troops and the subsequent "shale revolution". (for the stupid, the theft of hydrocarbons is called a revolution)
      and Afghanistan? first find the answer to the question: what does everyone need there?
      hint: mountains ...
      1. +2
        30 August 2015 10: 21
        Quote: redeemer
        hint: mountains ...

        And a wonderful climate for poppy growth.
    3. 0
      30 August 2015 08: 50
      And what? The idea is interesting ...
    4. +9
      30 August 2015 10: 42
      Quote: Doctor Savage
      Aluminum airplane fuselages pierced the double steel beams of the skyscraper structure ... this is a terrorist attack so a terrorist attack !!

      If you told how a Boeing could fit in a 2-meter hole in the Pentagon building, I would put a monument to you without hands ...
      1. +6
        30 August 2015 12: 02
        Quote: sabakina
        Quote: Doctor Savage
        Aluminum airplane fuselages pierced the double steel beams of the skyscraper structure ... this is a terrorist attack so a terrorist attack !!

        If you told how a Boeing could fit in a 2-meter hole in the Pentagon building, I would put a monument to you without hands ...

        the real Boeing could not fall on the pentagon along such a trajectory, as the official version of the USA says, and Boeing’s engines were not found. Unlike New York, where they showed the crash of aircraft at the WTC from different angles, we did not show the video with the crash of planes at the Pentagon.
        The Boeing was most likely like this:
        1. +5
          30 August 2015 12: 23
          Quote: 0255

          the real Boeing could not fall on the pentagon along such a trajectory, as the official version of the USA says, and Boeing’s engines were not found. Unlike New York, where they showed the crash of aircraft at the WTC from different angles, we did not show the video with the crash of planes at the Pentagon.

          the names of the passengers of the crashed Boeing into the Pentagon are classified. According to the official version, the engines burned out - the entire plane burned out and nothing remained of it. The original photo posted on the network was this. With a comment from the Pentagon that the plane crashed into the Pentagon. After the mass comments that this is complete bullshit, the photo was removed, but managed to scatter around the world.
          1. +2
            30 August 2015 12: 43
            And the Americans also filmed a d / f, where they said that the "sector" of the Pentagon building, where the Boeing fell, was reinforced from being hit by a plane or a rocket, shortly before September 11. Like the Pentagon was lucky - insidious terrorists accidentally fell where the building was reinforced, if they got there where the building was not reinforced, they would destroy the entire Pentagon. Another "happy accident".
            Plus, on September 11, passengers who did not know how to fly an airplane still heroically took the Boeing falling onto the white house and saved the president of the United States, just like in a Hollywood action movie, only without a happy ending, where a passenger lands the plane at the airport on commands from the ground.
            Somehow a lot of "accidents" ...
          2. 0
            30 August 2015 15: 03
            So he is from "magnesium" !! Didn't you know ??? People from "hydrogen" .......
        2. +5
          30 August 2015 15: 02
          There is video from cameras from the parking lot near the pentagon. Yes ... Cruise missile. And the size and shape of the "hole" speak volumes. Size is generally something. The height of hitting the wall of the Pentagon, it's just - SOMETHING !!! You could guide a Boeng of this size past trees, poles, etc. and get THEM almost into the foundation ???
          ABOUT...
          1. +4
            30 August 2015 15: 57
            Quote: scorpiosys
            You could lead a Boeng of this size past trees, poles, etc. and get IM almost into the foundation ???

            and cho ... folded his wings and ... lol
    5. +1
      30 August 2015 16: 26
      Aluminum airplane fuselages pierced the double steel beams of the skyscraper structure ... this is a terrorist attack so a terrorist attack !!

      Or maybe the double steel beams were killed not by aluminum airplane fuselages, but by ultra-low power nuclear charges specially laid down in the building structure?
      http://masterok.livejournal.com/1310846.html
      What should they use nuclear weapons in Afghanistan if they used nuclear weapons in their country to enter this Afghanistan?
      ... This happened in connection with the emergence of a new generation of buildings that appeared in the late 60s. Namely, buildings on a steel frame ...
      These steel columns were incredibly thick-walled — each wall was 2,5 inches (6,35 cm) thick, so the total thickness of each of the columns was 5 inches (12,7 cm). To imagine how much this is, here is a good example for comparison: the frontal armor of the best of the tanks of the Second World War - the T-34 - was only 1,8 inches (4,5 cm) and it was single-walled.
      However, in those days there was virtually no artillery armor-piercing projectile capable of penetrating this armor. Of course, that no explosives will also ever be able to break through the frontal armor of a tank (with the exception of only cumulative charges; but even cumulative charges cannot break through such armor in the sense in which we consider it here - such charges can only burn through a narrow hole in the armor plate) ...
      However, in accordance with US laws governing the construction of skyscrapers, their architects must submit a satisfactory demolition project in order for the construction project to be approved by the Buildings Department at all. No one may be allowed to erect a skyscraper that will be impossible to demolish in the future. This is the main reason why such nuclear drift systems are generally integrated into skyscrapers. This may sound ironic, but such skyscraper nuclear demolition systems were not designed to actually demolish these skyscrapers, especially considering that no one has practical experience in such an industry. The nuclear demolition systems were intended only to convince the Department of Buildings to allow the construction itself.

      http://www.rususa.com/news/print.asp-nid-64331
      "Health Problems" are mainly leukemia. And "toxic dust" is radiation contamination.
      Pearl Harbor 2.0
  3. +1
    30 August 2015 08: 33
    I would not be surprised, given the number of questions that the investigation did not answer. To burn Afghanistan and ends up in the water, this is exactly what happened, the American super specialists could not capture the old man and just sewed him on.
    1. +2
      30 August 2015 08: 46
      sewn? and then who is in the white house?
    2. +1
      30 August 2015 08: 48
      Quote: APASUS
      I would not be surprised, given the number of questions that the investigation did not answer. To burn Afghanistan and ends up in the water, this is exactly what happened, the American super specialists could not capture the old man and just sewed him on.


      Have you sewn? Who saw the corpse? And was there an old man?
      1. +3
        30 August 2015 10: 10
        Quote: bolat19640303
        Have you sewn? Who saw the corpse? And was there an old man?

        That's the question: when a decrepit old man from Afghanistan was able to turn off the Pentagon’s most modern security system. To fly planes over the country and wasn’t detected by air defense systems. There are too many random coincidences saying that the Americans themselves could be in share
  4. +3
    30 August 2015 08: 36
    Anything can be expected from Washington. For them, all the rest of the world are "inhumans", "animals" and "criminals".
  5. +1
    30 August 2015 08: 40
    Judging by the behavior of amerovski police, then such a reaction could be, and under the sly lupanut on undesirable.
  6. +1
    30 August 2015 08: 41
    That's who really waves the "Nuclear Cudgel" is Washington. Having used nuclear weapons back in 1945, against the civilians of Japan. But how necessary were the atomic bombings of Japan, which, thanks to the Soviet army, was already on the verge of surrender. Or is it a Nuclear experiment was ....?!
  7. +3
    30 August 2015 08: 47
    the administration of then president George W. Bush did not rule out a nuclear strike on Afghanistan

    For some reason, this information is not at all surprising. You can expect everything from the United States, including a nuclear strike. The painful sense of "exclusivity" exceeded all possible limits. A country that keeps the whole world in suspense.
    1. 0
      30 August 2015 12: 05
      Quote: rotmistr60
      the administration of then president George W. Bush did not rule out a nuclear strike on Afghanistan

      For some reason, this information is not at all surprising. You can expect everything from the United States, including a nuclear strike. The painful sense of "exclusivity" exceeded all possible limits. A country that keeps the whole world in suspense.

      And back in 2003, before the US invasion of Iraq, the news said that the US command was considering a nuclear strike on Iraq. But they refused - they probably don’t want to pump radioactive oil
  8. +2
    30 August 2015 08: 48
    An attack to control heroin flows, I think.
  9. +2
    30 August 2015 08: 50
    In general, it's okay - they themselves staged a terrorist attack, they themselves "would have fired" with a vigorous bomb ?! Who gave them? According to Bush Jr., it was clear with the naked eye that he did not have all the houses, anything could be expected from him.
  10. +2
    30 August 2015 08: 51
    the Yankees, of course, are morons, but not enough to pamper the core in the corner between Russia, China and India
    1. 0
      30 August 2015 09: 29
      Quote: andrei332809
      the Yankees, of course, are morons, but not enough to pamper the core in the corner between Russia, China and India

      Colleague! hi It is not good to read other people's thoughts! sad Or do you write off ?? belay
      Hello to those who are dependent on those who have embarked on the path of enlightenment! drinks
      1. +2
        30 August 2015 10: 02
        Quote: retired
        Hello to those who are dependent on those who have embarked on the path of enlightenment!

        healthy hi but at the expense of your correction, vague doubts torment me what
        1. +2
          30 August 2015 11: 41
          Quote: andrei332809
          at the expense of your correction, vague doubts torment me

          Read carefully, Colleague: not corrections, but enlightenment winked ...
          1. +2
            30 August 2015 14: 58
            Hello Jura! Now you abuse only the light? Belenkaya and S2H5ON?
        2. +2
          30 August 2015 11: 50
          Quote: andrei332809
          healthy

          Porzhi:
          The head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine announced on his Facebook about the arrest of "a policeman - a small bribe taker with the name Putin." In addition, Arsen Avakov regretted that "Putin is not the one yet."

          “They detained Putin! In Odessa, the Ministry of Internal Affairs internal security service detained a policeman, a petty bribe taker with the name Putin. The precinct. For a bribe 1200 UAH from a shawarma kiosk.

          Eh, I know how sweetly your heart skipped a beat at the first words of this post. But for now, Putin is not the same. Bye. ”Avakov wrote on his Facebook page.

          You have to ... wink
          1. +2
            30 August 2015 11: 53
            Quote: retired
            You have to.

            I already read this in the morning ... on the censor tongue oh farts are torn there
  11. +2
    30 August 2015 08: 54
    To deliver a nuclear strike on Afghanistan.
    Not new, the USA has always been distinguished by a commitment to provocations and can fabricate any, even unthinkable nonsense.
    The explosions of the "twins" were most likely carried out by the special services, as well as other provocations such as the assassination of the Archduke, the attack on the radio station in Gleiwitz, the Gulf of Tonkin, etc. It's just that everything further becomes apparent, because. everything is sewn with white thread and you can't hide a sewing in a sack.
    It's no secret that America has long turned into a MONSTER country and its end is inevitable. No matter how much the rope curls, there will always be an end !.
  12. +3
    30 August 2015 08: 54
    The United States was going to launch nuclear strikes on Afghanistan,
    but someone remembered in time that, in fact, not only Afghanistan had nothing to do with it,
    but that the buildings were prepared for destruction in advance, what if the truth comes up?
    The appearance of buildings during the collapse resembles the collapse of buildings prepared for demolition.
  13. +4
    30 August 2015 08: 57
    The agency recalls that the attacks in New York were committed by Al-Qaeda representatives with the help of hijacked passenger planes that were directed at the MTC buildings. As a result, about 3 thousand people died.
    WHAT for brainwashing - September 11, Alkaida - Amerekosy were not slaughtered by Feikk's chopping block - and they raped half the world !!! And the same Germany supported the actions of the States! counting on certain bonuses))!
  14. +6
    30 August 2015 09: 00
    So it is necessary to lower them to the ground as soon as possible, otherwise they often take down the tower because of their exclusivity. Especially when they believe that nothing will happen to them!
    1. +1
      30 August 2015 10: 30
      Omitting, of course, is urgently needed and it's high time !!! Only, I think, "sooner" will not work - they assured themselves of their own exclusiveness throughout the history of the United States. Now you have to "tinker" ...
  15. +4
    30 August 2015 09: 02
    Nuclear bomb ... to the village? This is idiocy.
  16. +2
    30 August 2015 09: 13
    "German diplomat: George W. Bush did not rule out the possibility of a nuclear strike in response to the September 11 attacks"

    Interesting, and on what objects? By the CIA? Or the White House? Since it was they who carried out this attack.
  17. HAM
    +4
    30 August 2015 09: 21
    Armed with a d-rk is bad, but a frightened d-rk is scary .....
    1. +1
      30 August 2015 09: 32
      Quote: HAM
      Armed with a d-rk is bad, but a frightened d-rk is scary .....

      A mentally abnormal, ambitious, mentally retarded, e.
  18. 0
    30 August 2015 09: 25
    [quote] [/ Agency recalls terrorist attacks in New York were committed by representatives of al-Qaeda]
    Too simple conclusions are drawn at this agency. Under the influence of emotions, I suppose. And who planned the operation did not occur to find out? First you need to prepare direct performers and provide them with training at least in a minimal amount. Over time, it turns out about three years, from this we must begin the countdown of the beginning of the operation. The CIA should have turned its eyes.
    Yes, and the elimination of virtual Bin Laden would be worth it. Did it really exist at all? Why is such a simple operation secret?
  19. +2
    30 August 2015 09: 32
    They hysteria over black. It could well include inadequacy.
  20. +2
    30 August 2015 09: 48
    The operation and the explosion of the towers developed in the United States and dumped on al-Qaeda. The United States needed a great pretext, and they created it, produced it and got it. And they will also create a new excuse and blame it on whoever they want. There is no need to go far - Everyone knows about it. soldier
    1. +3
      30 August 2015 10: 20
      Someone with their minus wants to show that I'm wrong and the United States is so white and good. Then look at their aggression since at least 1945 around the world. But he himself probably doesn’t feed on money from the United States — they pay pittance there, but he pays off with the money that he makes in RUSSIA and RUSSIA, I’ve already met such people in Russia - You’re a bastard, and I’m ready to cut my people in Ukraine . soldier am
      1. +2
        30 August 2015 11: 08
        Someone quietly walked in, eliminated everyone who is not surprised that everything can be expected from the United States and also quietly left. Adorers of the "exceptional" have not yet been extinct.
  21. +2
    30 August 2015 09: 53
    Are there adequate people there at all? Such an impression is their goal to destroy the World. Before they are played, and definitely the hour of reckoning will come
  22. +1
    30 August 2015 09: 56
    US reaction will indeed be excessive due to shock

    Well, maybe ordinary citizens then experienced a shock, but the leadership of this country is most likely not.

    Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks in New York using hijacked passenger planes that were sent to the MTC buildings

    And here is a lie. That would have been written: the attacks in New York were committed by representatives of al-Qaeda with the support of the ruling circles of the United States ...

    I think that it is clear to everyone now that the states should remove 2 buildings with all the people in order to gain access to oil is like 2 fingers. What 2 buildings ... They are now cutting out entire countries and nothing.
  23. +1
    30 August 2015 10: 19
    "... the German government" at that moment seriously feared that the US reaction would indeed be excessive "
    Now, the German government is not afraid ...! BDSM games, addictive ...! To me, apply to me! No. angry
    1. +1
      30 August 2015 10: 37
      There, it seems, all the geyropeysky politics on BDSM games is built, otherwise you will not name ...
  24. +1
    30 August 2015 13: 40
    Well --- well. From a cannon at the sparrows. Aiming there ----- get by "mistake" still somewhere, and then cry, repent, be ashamed ----- American-style.
  25. +1
    30 August 2015 13: 51
    Nuclear strike on "oneself ...". There are no words even.
    But, I would not mind seeing this "reality show".
  26. +1
    30 August 2015 15: 08
    The metal supports of the shopping center (located in the middle of the building) after the collapse were in the form of neat cuts at an angle of about 30 degrees. That is, they were cut in advance (during the so-called installation of new communication equipment) a month before the "catastrophe" so that the buildings culturally subsided, and did not fall on the floor of New York.
  27. +1
    30 August 2015 19: 49
    This one could have a wire in his head
    1. +1
      30 August 2015 19: 53
      full nerd lol
  28. 0
    30 August 2015 19: 58
    Strange statement.

    Given that the cost of one atomic bomb may exceed the cost of the whole of Afghanistan. Well, maybe half. Well, even if a quarter.

    Do you need it?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"