The head of NASA is dissatisfied with the need to pay their astronauts space in the Russian "Union"

167
The head of NASA, Charles Bolden, is unhappy with the fact that American astronauts are forced to fly the ISS on Russian missiles. His article, published in the journal Wired, leads RIA News.



Bolden's article is called “Congress, do not force us to“ fly in the car ”with Russia. With love, NASA. ” In it, he expressed dissatisfaction with the fact that the agency had to extend the contract with Roskosmos, since “they cannot currently deliver their astronauts to the ISS.” Americans this contract will cost $ 490 million.

Bolden himself had to ask this money from the congress "in order to pay six places in the Soyuz spacecraft before 2017 of the year." At the same time, he accused congressmen of “inadequate funding for the program of private space travel.”

“Space travel is difficult, but the choice is simple: either we invest in ourselves, in our business, our skills, our people, or instead send dollars to our taxpayers in Russia,” writes the head of NASA. “Every dollar we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we don’t invest in American business.”

Bolden compares the situation in the space sphere with the “need to constantly order takeaway food due to the lack of a private kitchen”.

That's just "in this case, take-away food costs us hundreds of millions of dollars," he notes.

167 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +78
    29 August 2015 14: 15
    therefore, we don’t stop cooperating with minke whales so that they don’t start developing their space engines. So they don’t have engines and they pay us money.
    1. +44
      29 August 2015 14: 19
      Moreover, there are no other, such cheap places as in our "Soyuz"!
      1. +69
        29 August 2015 14: 31
        Probably worth taking in gold instead of dollars. Well, or for example in the carousel at worst.
        1. +11
          29 August 2015 15: 39
          Gold is then bought for dollars. While they sell)))
          1. +7
            30 August 2015 10: 42
            Let dollars to rubles be translated and calculated in national currency, this is a plus for the ruble
        2. +11
          29 August 2015 20: 04
          Quote: i80186
          Probably worth taking in gold instead of dollars. Well, or for example in the carousel at worst.



          A good barter would be ... lumps - lumps, and high-precision modern machines are a thing ...
          1. +4
            31 August 2015 00: 47
            Quote: veksha50
            A good barter would be ... lumps - lumps, and high-precision modern machines are a thing ...

            But I'm not sure that you can buy good machines from the Americans, rather from the Japanese or Germans.
        3. +7
          29 August 2015 21: 36
          Quote: i80186
          carousels at worst.

          Carousel machines and a hedgehog with them (I mean machines) will probably be more valuable than gold now.
          1. +6
            31 August 2015 11: 10
            And what is so innovative about a carousel that is already 150 years old?
            Another thing is why we do not do CNC machines ourselves.

            here the answer is simple. Our business is ready to invest only in trade, and not in production and techies. And the point here is not even the rate of profit, - absolutely alien mentalities to a businessman - it is extremely difficult to listen to the advice of a technically competent person, because they told him that he was the navel of the earth.
            Because our business will be invested only in cash registers - the only thing he understands.
        4. +8
          30 August 2015 06: 55
          Quote: i80186
          Well, or for example in the carousel at worst.

          It’s necessary to build your own machines! Neh.en repeat the path of amers!
        5. +4
          30 August 2015 14: 24
          Quote: i80186
          Well, or for example in the carousel at worst.

          ----------------------
          Why in the carousel? We need 3D-processing centers or something like that ... And not only them ...
      2. +9
        29 August 2015 14: 34
        as one of my leaders used to say: "If you don't like it, quit!"
        1. avg
          +5
          29 August 2015 14: 50
          And we used to say: "Whether you want it or not, you will!" sad
          1. +11
            29 August 2015 15: 13
            Bolden's article is titled “Congress, don't make us hitchhike with Russia. Love, NASA. "

            To me, too, they pretend to be "cosmic shoulder", which if someone makes them "hitchhike". fool
          2. +11
            29 August 2015 15: 53
            And also: do not want to pay go on foot.
            1. +12
              29 August 2015 16: 40
              No, why? One of our friends already advised them on trampolines. Normal such advice, and most importantly, absolutely free.
              1. +6
                29 August 2015 23: 21
                This comrade is called the esteemed Dmitry Ragozin. And he said it right. Nice for the power!
            2. +2
              29 August 2015 21: 37
              Quote: Uncle VasyaSayapin
              go on foot.

              Well, or on trampolines!
          3. +2
            30 August 2015 16: 43
            The head of NASA is unhappy - as the joke says Something I don’t like Petka Chinganchuk - I don’t like not to eat Vasily Ivanovich.
            1. 0
              30 August 2015 17: 57
              Not like that: I don’t like these cats!
              -Just you don’t know how to cook them ...
        2. +3
          29 August 2015 18: 48
          If you want to say: "I don't like flying and paying - go to the ISS on foot!" laughing good
        3. +2
          29 August 2015 19: 49
          Actually, your boss is a big fool, it seems.
          1. +1
            30 August 2015 08: 41
            and how many such fools and fools in Russia .....
          2. +1
            30 August 2015 12: 54
            there are enough such leaders (do not like to leave) - everywhere, I think alas, most of them, therefore, life in the former USSR is not very good.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +11
        29 August 2015 14: 39
        hitchhiking "with Russia. Love, NASA


        So he admits that Americans in space are just passengers!

        And what knowledge in mathematics and logic does he have !!!
        Every dollar we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we do not invest in American business

        Just a startling conclusion. Who prompted or guessed? wassat
        1. +5
          29 August 2015 14: 47
          Every dollar we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we do not invest in American business

          Just a startling conclusion. Who prompted or guessed? wassat

          He’s not a smart guy, he explained to congressmen laughing
          1. +3
            29 August 2015 15: 52



            Bolden is absolutely right. He advocates the development of the Am-astronautics, but the fact is that His Majesty DOLLAR prevails over sound reasoning.


        2. +7
          29 August 2015 15: 30
          Quote: Temples
          So he admits that Americans in space are just passengers!

          Let them also watch the fantastic serial film, filmed under the documentary - "Americans on the Moon!"
          And after all the statements again: were there Americans on the moon ?!
        3. +4
          29 August 2015 15: 45
          Quote: Temples
          So he admits that Americans in space are just passengers!

          They are already passengers all over. What do they ride in debt.
        4. 0
          29 August 2015 20: 07
          Quote: Temples
          So he admits that Americans in space are just passengers!



          Unfortunately, here you can look at his statements and intonation a little differently ...

          He implies that astronauts on a "ride" for big money fly on CASH ISS !!!

          Ever since the launch of this project, I have been thinking: well, when do amers chop off themselves that they do not belong to 100% ???

          Here are the first echoes ... International ... They already feel like hosts there ...
      5. +2
        29 August 2015 14: 54
        Quote: Baikonur
        Moreover, there are no other, such cheap places as in our "Soyuz"!

        There is! Trampoline!!!! Cheap and angry ... fellow laughing
      6. +2
        29 August 2015 15: 57
        Cheaper - make a movie in the pavilion about flying, in a dream and in reality.
      7. +1
        30 August 2015 21: 13
        Like not) But what about the famous Ukrop Trampolines? It is necessary to reduce the head of NASA with the head of Ukraine.
      8. 0
        31 August 2015 05: 33
        On the "side", by the toilet!
      9. 0
        31 August 2015 11: 07
        Quote: Baikonur
        Moreover, there are no other, such cheap places as in our "Soyuz"!

        Namely, until recently, their flights cost 3 times more. Let the fog do not let.
      10. 0
        31 August 2015 11: 38
        so then, besides the union in general, there are no other places love
      11. 0
        31 August 2015 22: 06
        Not really cheaper places to eat. One hundred Americans and a big slingshot, or, like Jules Verne’s cannon. laughing
      12. 0
        1 September 2015 12: 42
        Campaign offer shtatovtsam finally standing.)))
    2. +1
      29 August 2015 14: 30
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      therefore, we don’t stop cooperating with minke whales so that they don’t start developing their space engines. So they don’t have engines and they pay us money.

      Their dear engines come out, therefore it is more profitable to buy ours.
      1. +1
        29 August 2015 20: 35
        Quote: anEkeName
        Their dear engines come out, therefore it is more profitable to buy ours.

        It’s not that they are expensive, but that there aren’t any of them acceptable, as there have never been.
        Well, plus, with KK the identity is full strained.
    3. +1
      29 August 2015 14: 37
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      The head of NASA is dissatisfied with the need to pay their astronauts space in the Russian "Union"

      Here. And this is just the beginning. You will have to pay a lot for what soon. soldier
    4. +4
      29 August 2015 14: 54
      The head of NASA is dissatisfied with the need to pay their astronauts space in the Russian "Union"


      if you don’t want, don’t fly, who is holding you? fly on your deltas, you can fly on Arians or on the Chinese of choice in bulk, even on your saturns, slap and fly from naphthalene ...
      1. +2
        29 August 2015 15: 07
        I represent the start of amers on Chinese engines. Attention, ignition, start, and from there the song - black eyesaaaaa!
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        29 August 2015 20: 26
        Bolden compares the situation in the space sphere with the “need to constantly order takeaway food due to the lack of a private kitchen”.
        That's just "in this case, take-away food costs us hundreds of millions of dollars," he notes.
        The head of NASA is dissatisfied with the need to pay their astronauts space in the Russian "Union"

        Well, some wealthy people can only eat at a restaurant all their lives! bully
        But building your own "kitchen" will turn out not in hundreds of millions, but in billions. Yes
        So is this Bolden happy or not - what's the difference? The main thing is that the USA really supports the Russian space industry with the dollar! good
    5. 0
      29 August 2015 15: 55
      Bolden's article is titled Congress, Don't Make Us Hitchhiker

      Yes, for God's sake, there are trampolines, deliver from them laughing
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +2
      29 August 2015 17: 22
      In the meanie! Nuland on cookies for the Maidan more fell off and that the American taxpayers are not indignant.laughing
    8. 0
      29 August 2015 18: 38
      Why cry, he himself asked for money from the Congress for places in the "Russian ride". If you are not able to create anything worthy yourself - pay money.
    9. 0
      29 August 2015 18: 40
      Well, yes, they have absolutely nowhere to go, the truth may eventually go to China.
    10. +1
      29 August 2015 18: 45
      Unfortunately, this is a matter of time ... They are developing, sooner or later they will succeed ... But the money that they (striped) pay does not malfunction ours (I hope) ... IMHO hi
    11. +1
      29 August 2015 19: 48
      It's good! It is necessary everywhere in everything to be so. And not blah blah about import substitution of one for another, but not own production.
    12. +2
      30 August 2015 07: 28
      Quote: AdekvatNICK
      so that they do not start developing their space engines.

      And they will not start! Think back to the history of rocketry. At the end of the 30s, the Germans began the development of the FAU on the basis of a liquid-propellant engine, in the USSR - the solid-fuel RS "Katyusha". By the way, the Germans have also developed a solid-fuel "Faust-cartridge". At that time, the Americans did not have ANY jet systems. After the collapse of Nazi Germany, the Americans jumped in the development of jet technology, and then only thanks to Werner von Braun, who was taken to the United States as a "trophy", along with his developments. After his death in 1977, the development of missile technology in the United States ceased. And in the USSR, rocketry developed by trial and error. Of course, some German developments came to us, but these were just papers that had to be comprehended and implemented into a product. So we have more chances. In addition, the Americans have a very developed industrial espionage, and much from the USSR flowed to them. In Russia, however, almost no development is being conducted, and the United States, at the moment, is sitting on a hungry intellectual ration ...
      1. +1
        30 August 2015 09: 05
        In fairness
        Quote: Alexashka964
        At the same time, the Americans did not have ANY reactive systems.
        if you are already talking about availability
        Quote: Alexashka964
        The Germans have also developed a solid propellant "Faust-cartridge"
        As well as
        Quote: Alexashka964
        in the USSR - solid-fuel RS "Katyusha"

        Since 1942, America has had a dynamo-rocket-propelled grenade launcher, as well as a Rocket Launcher T34 (Calliope.) Which used M-8 rockets.
        1. 0
          31 August 2015 08: 43
          Quote: Svetoch
          Since 1942, America has had a dynamo-rocket-propelled grenade launcher, as well as Rocket Launcher T34 (Calliope.)

          Nobody argues that the Americans also had rocket launchers, only that was SIGNIFICANTLY later than it appeared in the USSR or Germany. So, the famous "Katyusha" (BM-13), in the USSR was put into service in March 1941. As for grenade launcher systems, in the USSR, back in 1928, a rifle grenade launcher of the Dyakonov system was adopted. And it was superior in range to the American Bazooka (M-1), and by 1942 it was removed from service due to insufficient efficiency ...
        2. -1
          31 August 2015 09: 00
          Yes, I got excited about the faustpatron, it was a simplified response to the American "Bazooka".
          1. 0
            31 August 2015 11: 17
            Quote: Alexashka964
            Yes, I got excited about the faustpatron, it was a simplified response to the American "Bazooka".

            The Faust cartridge was the development of a cumulative magnetic mine, which was manually sculpted on board the tank. It's just that the probability of using such a mine has come to naught. So they made her fly, first 30 meters, then further. There was nothing to do with the bazooka, either in the concept or in the design.
            It is worth mentioning the spring British PIAT grenade launcher.
    13. +1
      30 August 2015 08: 05
      here's a story about the benefits of sanctions ...
      if there were no sanctions, no one in Russia would even itch! what for? dumping is much easier and more profitable!
      the same with dviglom - easier to buy! (much easier and much cheaper!)
    14. 0
      30 August 2015 21: 16
      mattresses begin to understand the rules of a market economy
    15. 0
      31 August 2015 15: 53
      Well, jump into space on a trampoline)))
  2. +19
    29 August 2015 14: 15
    I will sell a trampoline. expensive
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 14: 48
      It’s from what height should it be kicked at, what would it fly to the ISS?
      1. +2
        29 August 2015 15: 03
        From the height of the ISS .....)))) laughing

        Py.Sy. And these people tell us something for flying to the moon ... Kindergarten!
      2. 0
        30 August 2015 07: 38
        Quote: demo
        It’s from what height should it be kicked at, what would it fly to the ISS?

        And under it, the squib stands for a couple of kilotons!
        1. 0
          30 August 2015 08: 48
          this is -.... lauston the so-called squib
      3. 0
        30 August 2015 18: 08
        One astronaut jumps out of the ISS and falls on a trampoline, the next takes off to orbital orbit and knock, knock ... Russian, do not let go warm up?
      4. 0
        31 August 2015 05: 38
        Ukrainians will teach.
    2. +14
      29 August 2015 15: 16
      Quote: andrei332809
      I will sell a trampoline. expensive

      Space trampoline named after Rogozin.
      1. +3
        29 August 2015 15: 20
        "And we do not dream of the roar of the cosmodroooomaaaa !!"
        1. +9
          29 August 2015 15: 26
          Citizens !!! Pass for travel, do not delay !!! laughing
          1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          29 August 2015 20: 31
          Quote: Dr. Bormental
          "And we do not dream of the roar of the cosmodroooomaaaa !!"

          "Countryman in a battery, countryman in a battery" ... feel
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      29 August 2015 16: 57
      Quote: andrei332809
      selling trampoline.

      Selling a pack of Chinese fireworks. Rectally.
      Quote: andrei332809
      expensive

      More expensive winked
      Hi colleague! drinks
      1. +1
        29 August 2015 17: 31
        Quote: retired
        Hi colleague!

        healthy hi
        Quote: retired
        Selling a pack of Chinese fireworks.

        traction is not enough request but here is the rd into the anus, yeah ....
        1. +2
          29 August 2015 17: 34
          Quote: andrei332809
          traction is not enough

          I did not promise request put it into orbit ... winked
        2. +8
          29 August 2015 17: 35
          Quote: andrei332809
          traction is not enough

          Yur that vomil feel so they can
          1. +2
            29 August 2015 17: 44
            Quote: andrei332809
            themselves will be able

            Yaytsenyuk? what
            1. +2
              29 August 2015 17: 47
              Quote: retired
              Yaytsenyuk?

              yes, probably, any juntik will be a tester. although ... the rabbit is the easiest one
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. -36
    29 August 2015 14: 18
    Do not want to pay do not have to! "Ours" will carry them for free - "if only there was no war."
    1. +8
      29 August 2015 14: 27
      Do you yourself believe in what you said?))
      1. +3
        29 August 2015 16: 37
        I will reveal a terrible secret: They carry it for free now, but only "there", "up", and back ... if you please, please fork out wink
        1. +3
          29 August 2015 17: 43
          Quote: Rader
          and back ... kindly fork out

          But is it possible to dump the ISS quietly? Type: forgot to pick uprequest sorry gentlemenrecourse... then we'll take Yes .
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. +6
    29 August 2015 14: 19
    Damn, their industry is awesome, read yesterday laughing But the production of catapults and trampolines, have not mastered what Sadness, but there is a way out, let the Chinese order wassat
    1. +2
      29 August 2015 14: 33
      Why are they needed there at all? Give a parachute and under the asshole kick ... and fly to the ground only ashes ...
      1. +5
        29 August 2015 15: 44
        Quote: Dr. Bormental
        Give a parachute and under the ass kick.

        Dreams. Only I have nothing against these guys. Now, if you put McCainushka there with a trampoline, and then according to your scenario what applaud drinks , and for a long time already truancy is being put in hell. What does it have to do with everything, Vietnamese, Russians, and those on the aircraft carrier that he singed what
        1. +2
          29 August 2015 17: 24
          Yes, yes)) plus))) Great script)))
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 20
    Let the mattresses jump from the trampoline to the ISS!
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 18: 35
      Quote: rustemkm
      Let the mattresses jump from the trampoline to the ISS!

      let
  8. +4
    29 August 2015 14: 20
    The head of NASA, Charles Bolden, is unhappy with the fact that American astronauts are forced to fly the ISS on Russian rockets.

    And Russia is very unhappy that there is such a country of Pindo ..... this.
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 14: 28
      They don’t want ours, let them fly in Chinese.
  9. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 22
    Even a little with them, let them bargain on the market.
  10. +27
    29 August 2015 14: 24
    Hey there in the cabin! - pass on the fare! lol



    - Houston’s opinion, stop pliz ...
    - where we sit there and go out! got it !? we pass for travel!
  11. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 24
    Give Bolden a pen, a notebook, a baseball cap and a bag - let him rejoice. But seriously - the constant dark games in the rocket and space industry (rocket launchers, spacecraft that design for 15-20 years, and after which they are abandoned with the slogan until 2025, almost complete rejection of basic research, according to the level of interplanetary research vehicles - full 0 (even behind China, India, Japan), a sharp drop in the reliability of production, Vostochny cosmodrome, etc.), plus cheers-patriotism multiplied by Rogozin - as a result, others will laugh.
    1. +2
      29 August 2015 19: 56
      Unfortunately, you are right. Urya is a lot of people who think a little.
    2. 0
      30 August 2015 08: 55
      manned astronautics, is due to the allied backlog, then what ... and the research-Mars of the Moon of Venus-type telescopes
  12. +1
    29 August 2015 14: 25
    We didn’t have time to finish off our cosmonautics. Now cry.
    1. +1
      29 August 2015 17: 52
      Quote: roskot
      We didn’t have time to finish off our cosmonautics. Now cry.

      Here it was necessary to finish off their project for delivery, infringe them for the sick. And there are tourists to these places, then we will not lose money.
      It’s okay to own the ISS for its part from the earth. laughing
    2. 0
      30 August 2015 08: 57
      they didn’t finish theirs with their help
  13. +1
    29 August 2015 14: 25
    What a concern for taxpayers! All the same, they stupidly print dollars, or rather they type nine numbers on a computer, that's all their expenses.
  14. +4
    29 August 2015 14: 26
    He knocks out the loot from the Congress, our "space taxi" is just an excuse. Mattress covers in their role - "Money! Money! Give money!"
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 14: 49
      The stump is clear! You can’t cut off the dough listed by the state from a private trader; he himself cuts it. It remains to whine.
  15. +2
    29 August 2015 14: 26
    Ooty-ways! How touchy we are! You won't go anywhere, nits. Some of the "aggressor" stock up on hydrocarbons, others fly into space on it ... and at the same time, they overwhelm the whole world! Kuzkin's mother to you !! Inflate prices to the skies ... won't go anywhere! Positive news, there would be more of these)))
  16. +3
    29 August 2015 14: 28
    This is the result of close cooperation with Ukraine - I don’t know how or don’t want to, but give me one and I’ll definitely be free!
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 14: 36
      It seems to me the opposite - mattresses teach Ukrainians how to live in a mattress. Although Ukrainians have always been so ... the devil will break his leg)))
  17. +4
    29 August 2015 14: 28
    “Every dollar that we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we don’t invest in American business.”
    Here we have such patriotic officials!
  18. The comment was deleted.
    1. +2
      29 August 2015 14: 41
      Spend a lot of money on the war, that’s NASA’s cover. They thought they would be allowed on freebies to plow outer space while they were arranging hegemony here? Dulea. So the jackals howled.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  19. +3
    29 August 2015 14: 33
    They could not even make a rocket themselves. The Germans were found, he later did to Hitler. He died and you can’t do anything yourself. So you want to fly, buy a ticket from us.
  20. +1
    29 August 2015 14: 35
    “Space travel is difficult, but the choice is simple: either we invest in ourselves, in our business, our skills, our people, or instead send dollars to our taxpayers in Russia,” writes the head of NASA. “Every dollar we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we don’t invest in American business.”

    Normal, adequate response. Rogozin is probably about the same, probably beating off money for Vostochny. The only difference is that his principled position on this issue coincides with the President and the Prime Minister. The situation in the Russian Federation with general astronomy is, of course, awful. But here - what Juan, such a sombrero. The liberal approach to the country's economic development does not imply the Stalinist pace of development, unfortunately ...
    1. -1
      29 August 2015 14: 48
      I respect Stalin, but I would not like his "pace of development". We would be afraid with you now swinging picks at the construction of the cosmodrome. Let it be more delicate, like now, or what))
    2. 0
      30 August 2015 09: 03
      a good expression is what Juan. such and sombrero-only we have many Juan and one small sombrero on All ...
  21. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 36
    They didn’t want to pay for their space program, let them pay ours.
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 14: 53
      And they don’t have money for their space program. We must conquer the whole world, and blacks pay bad taxes.
  22. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 36
    Fly on your ... trampolines
  23. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 41
    Their financial tycoons figured out that it is more profitable to build aircraft carriers and "sell" democracy to the world than to spend on science. Moreover, scientists have already created all the tools for marketing them.
  24. 0
    29 August 2015 14: 46
    Guys, well, globalization is not what we came up with and are promoting. Who prevented your media from riveting you? Nope now.
  25. VP
    0
    29 August 2015 14: 54
    If the F-35 has already cost a trullik from the beginning of the program, then how much does it want to shake this cupcake from Congress to the spacecraft?
  26. HAM
    +3
    29 August 2015 14: 56
    One thing I don’t understand is how, by creating beautiful satellites, orbiting telescopes, rovers, etc., it was possible to screw up the delivery systems for this good.
    1. +1
      29 August 2015 22: 23
      Quote: HAM
      One thing I don’t understand is how, by creating beautiful satellites, orbiting telescopes, rovers, etc., it was possible to screw up the delivery systems for this good.

      It’s not funny, but automatic machines are much simpler than human flight.
  27. +1
    29 August 2015 14: 57
    If America "hegemonized" over Russia, it would receive flights into space from us for free. But no! - Pay for flights, and not with green bills, but with high-tech products! And even here they want to spend Russia on their green waste paper.
  28. +1
    29 August 2015 15: 00
    Then he accused congressmen of "inadequate financing of the program of private space travel"

    This is where everything is very clear. Skolkovo and Rusnano smoke aside in comparison with this drink.
  29. +1
    29 August 2015 15: 04
    I do not understand these amers. What do they want to achieve? Maybe they are all undernourished there, underdrink? Why do they need hegemony? There has never been a monopolar world and never will be. They climb everywhere. Well, they will conquer the whole planet for a kraynyak .. and what? What will they do with it? What is the end result of this "give me everything?"
  30. +5
    29 August 2015 15: 13
    Their would be the principles of business, but apply to them themselves. Throw others - "great"and they were lowered a little - "DOCOLE !!".
    My sister has the same larva. Her is not ours, but ours is this and hers, she believes.
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 17: 16
      Your sister "on a global scale" is the USA.
  31. 0
    29 August 2015 15: 23
    That's just "in this case, take-away food costs us hundreds of millions of dollars," he notes.
    Master Chef will help you.
  32. 0
    29 August 2015 15: 27
    There are other passengers who want to hitchhike. So gentlemen "come on in the anus" laughing
  33. 0
    29 August 2015 15: 31
    I agree with Rogozin, the best transport for the Yankees is Trampoline!
  34. 0
    29 August 2015 15: 40
    From the point of view of a person who loves his country (perhaps), he said everything correctly. Only his opinion in Congress and the government is not interesting. Delusions of grandeur, a printing press, bread rolls growing on trees do their job. I think in Congress it’s just all violet that this person. is talking. And I, as a citizen of Russia, cannot but rejoice.
  35. +1
    29 August 2015 16: 07
    And this is good comrades.
  36. +1
    29 August 2015 16: 14
    “Congress, don't make us hitchhike with Russia. Love, NASA. "

    Saturn-5, "landing" on the moon and so on and so on, this mattress it did not survive our 2 world, our 90s, wants to say that it is duper ??? They are parasites on the body of the earth. There is nothing more to say!
  37. +3
    29 August 2015 16: 15
    A reasonable question is brewing. How did they fly before? Is it difficult to build a rocket according to old drawings? Or, it’s scary to think, they didn’t have enough reliable missiles !! ??
    1. 0
      29 August 2015 22: 25
      Quote: Gyrfalcon
      Or, it’s scary to think, they didn’t have enough reliable missiles !! ??

      And no so far.
  38. +1
    29 August 2015 16: 20
    the storekeepers are going to build a space elevator. but where is the guarantee that it will be constantly working. It looks like a gringo is eyeing this venture begging for loot from its congressmen.
    1. +2
      29 August 2015 16: 42
      yeah. the French have already built a tunnel under the lamb. Now the gaster is breaking through it. So with the elevator turn out)))))))
  39. +1
    29 August 2015 16: 44
    Quote: Direct
    Do not want to pay do not have to! "Ours" will carry them for free - "if only there was no war."

    It is possible and free, only at their expense. Do not want to pay, let them sit at home.
  40. +2
    29 August 2015 16: 49
    Naturally, he is not happy, because the money is paid for each astronaut. But here's what's interesting: sanctions have been imposed on Russia for various spheres of activity, and in theory all cooperation between NASA and Roscosmos (or any other structure of ours) should be terminated - the sanctions! But no, the Americans themselves choose in which aspects to cooperate with Russia, and in which not. In this case, they simply “gritting” their teeth agree to use our launch vehicles to continue their work. We also can't show them a fig, because not only business is tied here, but probably also some kind of joint research. In this case, joint research, I think, is more important for us than showing the Americans a fig, and plus some kind of money dripping.

    NASA, and many senators like McCain, are asleep and see to get rid of the use of Russian engines. Although it would not be bad for them to get our technologies for free. But there are pipes. How right, many here have noticed: if you do not want to - do not fly (do not use).
    Another stupid, meaningless and powerless statement by one of the Americans, who believe that they are the first in all areas, but alas, this is not so and how painful it is for them. So the next groans begin.
  41. +1
    29 August 2015 16: 51
    490 million dollars .. you can pay 5300 engineers (well, or workers) a salary of 50000 for a year .. That way you could raise some kind of industry.
  42. +2
    29 August 2015 16: 55
    because "currently they cannot deliver their astronauts to the US ISS at the present time." This contract will cost the Americans $ 490 million.


    We need to throw on this contract. Goryuchka has risen in price with us ...
  43. +2
    29 August 2015 17: 06
    Americans are a super-pragmatic nation that has forgotten (or did not know) everything normal, which is the norm for us. Probably everyone has seen the scene in the American film when the GG declares with awesome pathos to the girl he invited to the restaurant something like "I'll pay for you." And he considers it in all seriousness almost a feat. Any penny garbage that they give even very close people as gifts. Instant sending of aged parents to a nursing home ... For us, this is ridiculous at best, savagery at worst. I saw all this just in American films. They do not hide it, for them it is the norm. So there is no wonder when they fly into space on our ships or ships with our engines. It's much cheaper that way. Business is nothing personal.
  44. +3
    29 August 2015 17: 11
    So they would be silent in a rag until they got their "own kitchen"! lol
  45. +2
    29 August 2015 17: 17
    And you walk around the market, look, maybe you will find cheaper.
  46. +4
    29 August 2015 17: 29
    NASA must be renamed OUR. Everything is logical))))
  47. 0
    29 August 2015 17: 36
    Quote: angel of hell
    “Every dollar that we invest in Moscow is a dollar that we don’t invest in American business.”
    Here we have such patriotic officials!

    This official is an idiot the same as the "Russians" who immediately invest these candy wrappers in US securities.
  48. 0
    29 August 2015 17: 47
    ...
    - Well, dissatisfied ...
    - is there a way out .. ????
    ..
    no - well, shut up ...
  49. +10
    29 August 2015 18: 02
    Charles Bolden, the leader of nasa is very funny, fly west on Russian devices, fly on your own, what's the problem?
    and if you don’t have your own, then stick your tongue to the ass and pay the money.
  50. -3
    29 August 2015 19: 25
    A POST! Let them fly with a hare, since there are problems with the dough.
    1. +1
      30 August 2015 19: 50
      Quote: Captive
      A POST! Let them fly with a hare, since there are problems with the dough.

      And if the controllers catch? After all, they will land them, then they will get home on space debris.
  51. 0
    29 August 2015 19: 33
    If you don’t like Soyuz, rent a catapult from the Maidan. Otherwise she stagnated with nothing to do. And it will cost less!
  52. 0
    29 August 2015 19: 33
    The Americans could create such engines and rockets themselves. It will take a lot of time, and they don’t have time. In the near future, a volcano will explode on American territory and the continent will disappear. Therefore, hundreds of thousands of plastic coffins have been prepared and a hopeless political course is being taken to destroy other nations in order to occupy their territories. They are also killing their lands - realizing that they will not be useful, with shale mining.
  53. 0
    29 August 2015 19: 46
    “Space travel is difficult, but the choice is simple: either we invest in ourselves, in our business, our skills, our people, or instead send our taxpayer dollars to Russia,” writes the head of NASA. “Every dollar we invest in Moscow is a dollar we don’t invest in American businesses.”
    And what? Smart man!
    Our leaders in all sectors should think so, but it would be better to do it as it should, that is, ourselves, in Russia.
  54. 0
    29 August 2015 19: 48
    There is an assumption that this situation arose as a result of the country’s shrinking budget. There are only enough funds for travel, but not for a means of transportation. Or the funds intended for NASA were transferred to the Pentagon budget (ISIS and military conflicts also cost money). Also based on American pragmatism (why spend your budget on rockets if you can fly on a Russian rocket), and use available funds to promote the Mars program, which the Americans are actively exaggerating and promoting. Or NASA funds go to the development of new weapons (laser, hypersonic weapons, or stealth type devices http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJDJAK2_xEw (the cost of one is $2 billion). In any case, the budget is already bursting and for that What you want is no longer enough. You have to save on something. Something like this, probably.
  55. +3
    29 August 2015 20: 26
    Respond to the “sanctions” with an unexpected “seasonal” increase in the price of “tickets”!
  56. 0
    29 August 2015 21: 06
    Well, if you don’t like Soyuz... they’ll find money for a trampoline anyway.
  57. Viktortopwar
    0
    29 August 2015 21: 50
    Trampoline is cheaper, jump on it!
  58. PPD
    0
    29 August 2015 21: 52
    If you're dissatisfied, you have to pay! So far everything is for travel to the route..., ugh, they won’t pay for the rocket, they’re going nowhere...,
    those. the rocket won't fly!
    There are no beneficiaries. And don’t let him wave his American pensioner ID. And the certificate from Obama is not valid! smile
  59. +1
    29 August 2015 21: 56
    They need to keep quiet since they don’t know how to make high-tech products. It's not riveting iPhones into space.
    This is precisely the idea that needs to be hammered into heads all over the world - a fact, a lagging power, cannot.
  60. 0
    29 August 2015 22: 38
    Have you tried contacting the gypsies? They have all sorts of junk...maybe they will find a replacement for Russian missiles
  61. +1
    29 August 2015 23: 41
    Houston we have problems =)
  62. 0
    30 August 2015 00: 04
    He wants us to take them for a thank you. They became insolent.
  63. 0
    30 August 2015 01: 56
    NASSA was conceived under the slogan SPACE - FOR ALL HUMANITY, but in practice it turned out to be another political prostitute, so this organization must be treated accordingly. I paid and I received, nothing more.
  64. 0
    30 August 2015 03: 24
    The head of NASA is unhappy with the need to pay
    Dude! I would also be happy to ride a minibus for free!..
  65. 0
    30 August 2015 04: 28
    Quote: lpd1
    There are other passengers who want to hitchhike. So gentlemen "come on in the anus" laughing

    ...advance another 60-70 million! Don't forget to pass on the fare!
  66. 0
    30 August 2015 06: 25
    Whether you like it or not, be patient, our beauty! No one has ever escaped from our strong hands... wassat
  67. +1
    30 August 2015 07: 10
    Let them pay in rubles! and learn Russian!
  68. c3r
    +1
    30 August 2015 07: 43
    If you don’t like paying in dollars, you can switch to the ruble equivalent. And involve Sochi taxi drivers in pricing! Then the mattress pads will start singing! wassat
  69. 0
    30 August 2015 08: 18
    Essentially the American is right. Another thing is why did I come to such a life?
  70. +1
    30 August 2015 08: 52
    Why, for the sake of “momentary” benefits, sell to our most ardent “not quite friends” rocket engines, which they, with some probability, can use not only “for peaceful purposes”, but also for military nuclear missiles? And this whole idea with the ISS seems to have outlived its usefulness (at least we don’t really need it), we haven’t acquired new technologies, and being a “taxi driver” is not a rewarding job! It looks like it’s time to sink it (the ISS) in the Pacific Ocean (like our World), but you can always find a good reason (especially since they say that its own new station is already on the way)! Land, land the “minke whales” in full! It’s the same for me, a space country, but it sends astronauts on foreign ships, like Mongolia...
  71. +1
    30 August 2015 09: 21
    Apparently, with the “best education in the world,” it is difficult for Americans to create a carrier for launching spacecraft into earth orbit. We in Russia should once again think carefully about who will design and create space technology. There is a movement towards recreating educational standards from the times of the USSR, and we need to speed it up.
  72. 0
    30 August 2015 09: 37
    The back-and-forth skating of American astronauts allows us to use “hoofed” money to develop our space technology, there’s no escape from that. But in light of America’s illegal sanctions against us, “travel tariffs” could be adjusted to compensate for these sanctions.
  73. 0
    30 August 2015 09: 43
    Indeed: the Moon, Pluto, Mars, Voyager, New Horizons, the all-seeing Hub, the Shuttle... You never know what else has been invented and transmitted to the world media by the American space agency in order to live comfortably through the years rushing. And here is such a “failure”. The Russians are taking American pioneer heroes to the international space station so that they can actually do something in space. Somehow it doesn’t fit with the image of the global exceptional “Avengers” and the “torn to shreds” industry of Russia. They probably dream of capturing all of Russia, or at least its “space patch,” and using this potential for their own exceptional flights into space. But they also stole everything they could from the Germans. But for some reason, the Russians were again the first, carrying out Yu.A.’s flight. Gagarin.
  74. 0
    30 August 2015 09: 58
    In fact, it is much more serious and there is no particular reason for laughter here.
    Let's consider an example - Ukraine-Russia. As we know, Russia is a world leader in helicopter manufacturing, HOWEVER, engines
    she was mainly supplied by the same country 0404. Alas and ah. Yes, it is possible to establish the production of such engines in Russia, and this is ALREADY being done.
    What are the minuses:
    1 Long, difficult and expensive. Expanding the production of helicopter engines is not opening a roadside cafe.
    2 Ukraine is losing existing production.

    Unfortunately, all these political games lead to a decrease in the overall technological potential.
    Pichalka.
    Only naive people think that doing EVERYTHING in one country is good and profitable.

    The same goes for space cooperation with the United States.
    At this particular moment, Russia has working engines and spaceships laughing ..

    Create a parallel release urgently in the USA??
    Can..
    But 1 Long time difficult and expensive
    2 Russia, having the production of Lehko, can produce additional products.

    There are objective (planetary) prerequisites for cooperation.

    However, some people consider themselves the chosen nation. crying

    In fact, in a sense, the situation with the Mistrals is repeated... which were made by the French at once...
    but now Russia declares that it will build them on its own...Due to lack of availability..

    What 1
    2 (see above)

    Once again, the problem is much more complicated..

    But the Americans do not want cooperation with Russia in the field of high-tech...
    So it goes. And they don’t give it to others.
    We also have something to buy from them - for example, elements for assembling supercomputers..

    It's all sad and sad.

    Globalization turns out to be some kind of stripped-down demo version...

    It is possible and even necessary to change oil for baksi, but rocket engines for electronics no no no no...
  75. 0
    30 August 2015 10: 13
    Cooperation is necessary.
    At this stage it becomes obvious.
    Humanity has already mastered and even re-developed planet Earth quite well. The happy Middle Ages are a thing of the past.
    Resources are limited, the planet (excluding Russia, Canada and Iceland) is overpopulated.
    But some individuals are planning to “throw out” Russia from the “club of civilized nations”

    Which paradoxically presupposes a war with Russia, since they cannot live without our resources..
    Or maybe, but much worse...
    In fact, someone is trying to “privatize” the concept of HUMANITY strictly for themselves and maybe for their friends..

    I'm afraid, gentlemen, we are really "on the eve of the big niggle"

    Try to imagine - Russia expanded trade to Asia (not in 1 year and not in 5, of course)
    Will Europe be able to bear this?
    No. Europe needs our resources and cannot pay for them in gold, but only in goods.

    And yet they are fighting to get rid of their energy dependence on Russia.
    Paradox.

    so it's not that great.
  76. 0
    30 August 2015 11: 48
    I would like to see a time when Americans will even pay for their fares in taxis, buses and subways in Russia.
  77. 0
    30 August 2015 11: 51
    Americans don’t like the “Unions”; an alternative has already been offered: - trampolines
  78. 0
    30 August 2015 12: 25
    congressmen still know how to count, they understand perfectly well that they will have to invest lards of bucksof into this project and then, in the end, flights of American astronafts will still cost more and are probably less safe - in essence, the money will be mastered, the product will be ready, and they will still fly on alliances because it’s cheaper. Then a fair question arises: why the hell are all these mans with their own shuttle needed?
    The destruction of comrades by NASA is quite natural when they cut up the budget money, and on a long-term and permanent basis - that is, the comrade and whoever stands behind him will provide for himself, his relatives, etc., etc. for many years to come with a well-paid job and a comfortable life)
    And the main question is what profit will the congressmen get from this - when will the profit be found so that the congressmen will soak their stings and NASA will then have a project for its own shuttle, and until the money is evenly cut between NASA and the congressmen, there can be no talk of any injections into us, as well as increasing funding for private enterprises involved in astronautics.
  79. +1
    30 August 2015 12: 36
    If the Yankees still cannot get to the ISS on their own, then how were they able to fly to the MOON in the late 60s???
    1. 0
      30 August 2015 16: 50
      Mystery .. request
      regression?
  80. 0
    30 August 2015 14: 02
    Ours needs to raise the ticket price at least 3 times. To restore the “torn to shreds” economy! laughing
    Although the development of their engines is in full swing, so our monopoly on engines of this type will not last long, and therefore see above!
  81. 0
    30 August 2015 20: 09
    smmok-ok.ru - high-quality promotion for classmates!
  82. 0
    30 August 2015 21: 07
    Quote: anEkeName
    Their dear engines come out, therefore it is more profitable to buy ours.

    As usual, everything falls into one big pile. an article by Charles Bolden is being considered about one thing, or rather, they are trying to review this article. But they immediately switch to everything else where the main argument is Rogozin’s nonsense about trampolines.

    Quote: Obolensky
    Naturally, he is not happy, because a lot of money is paid for each astronaut.

    If my sclerosis serves me right - 63 or 67 million per place.

    Quote: Cayman Gena
    Charles Bolden, the leader of NASA, is very funny, it’s a shame to fly on Russian devices, fly on your own, what’s the problem? And if you don’t have your own, then stick your tongue to your ass and pay money.

    No, he is simply, as a citizen and patriot of HIS COUNTRY, trying to explain to all the ruffians that he sits in Congress (as in our Duma) the NECESSITY to highlight MORE MONEY FOR YOUR OWN SPACE PROGRAM

    Quote: hannibal lecter
    The Americans could create such engines and rockets themselves. It will take a lot of time, and they don’t have time. In the near future, a volcano will explode on American territory and the continent will disappear. Therefore, hundreds of thousands of plastic coffins have been prepared and a hopeless political course is being taken to destroy other nations in order to occupy their territories. They are also killing their lands - realizing that they will not be useful, with shale mining.

    You started for health, correctly outlining the situation, and continued for peace, dragging in another conspiracy theory about the volcano.

    If the continent disappears, such a cataclysm will kill not only Americans, but the rest of the world. Therefore, you should not hope that only Americans will get the full amount. Other countries of the world will, to one degree or another, share the fate of the Americans. Some will partially disappear from the face of the earth, such as countries such as Russia, China and possibly India, others will completely disappear, such as Cuba, Nicaragua, Great Britain and many other island states....


    Quote: 1536
    Indeed: the Moon, Pluto, Mars, Voyager, New Horizons, the all-seeing Hub, the Shuttle...

    Well, conspiracy theories have begun.....
  83. +1
    30 August 2015 21: 10
    Quote: Olezhek
    In fact, it is much more serious and there is no special reason for laughter here. Let's consider an example - Ukraine-Russia. As we know, Russia is the world leader in helicopter manufacturing, HOWEVER, the engines were mainly supplied by that same country 0404. Alas and ah. Yes, it is possible to establish the production of such engines in Russia, and this is ALREADY being done. What are the disadvantages: 1 It takes a long time and is expensive. Expanding the production of helicopter engines is not opening a roadside cafe.2 Ukraine is losing its existing production.

    You are somewhat right in your reasoning, especially when it comes to engines.
    The Americans have efficient engines and only buy one or two of the entire line of engines from Russia. And not in mass quantities. EMNIP the number of engines sold and proposed for sale is just over 100. We have already supplied most of these RD-180s. Considering that the first stage of Atlas-5 uses 2 engines, all those sold will be enough for half a hundred launches. Yes, quickly making a similar engine is expensive. And they know how to count money. Therefore, instead of spending, for example, 10 billion dollars and 5 years, they will do it, for example, in 5 billion and 7 years.

    As for the impossibility of delivering American astronauts to
    ISS by American ships. Same situation. They make several ships at once (almost all, with the exception of Orion, are made by private companies). FIVE, if I'm not mistaken, incl. 1 purely cargo. Characteristics are superior to our "Soyuz-Progress". The timing of manned flights is 2016-2018 (for different ones). Our new ship is planned for the first manned flight in 2024. And by 2017 they will no longer need our ships... And we rejoice at Rogozin’s idiotic example. Will he return the money that the Americans paid us from his own pocket??? I doubt it very much

    Quote: 56_br
    If the Yankees still cannot get to the ISS on their own, then how were they able to fly to the MOON in the late 60s???

    And the “Dragons” are already slowly carrying cargo; in 2016 they will begin to carry astronauts. Before that they were transported by Shuttles. So there is nothing super unusual about not launching for some time. We also had times when there were no astronaut launches for a year or two, when the disaster was being investigated
  84. 0
    30 August 2015 21: 51
    smmok-ok.ru - high-quality promotion for classmates!
  85. 0
    30 August 2015 22: 27
    Quote: Starover_Z
    Quote: Temples
    So he admits that Americans in space are just passengers!

    Let them also watch the fantastic serial film, filmed under the documentary - "Americans on the Moon!"
    And after all the statements again: were there Americans on the moon ?!


    There is a big question about the reality of the flight to the Moon, but the fact that Kubrick had a signed contract with NASA for the studio filming of “Americans on the Moon” is a confirmed fact.
  86. +1
    30 August 2015 22: 58
    Quote: Pilot bin-bom
    There is a big question about the reality of the flight to the Moon, but the fact that Kubrick had a signed contract with NASA for the studio filming of “Americans on the Moon” is a confirmed fact.

    How many followers does Mukhin-Popov have? One is a journalist (the first) who writes about everything in the world. Knows everything about everything. And with it, as Ostap Bender said, with such wealth (knowledge) and freedom... The second optician. But they talk about technical issues that they have no idea about. For some reason, no one reads, for example, Shuneyko’s book. But almost all aerospace students study in it.
    I’ll tell you why no one reads or cites it as evidence. Only because it is a work, a monograph, if you like, with a gigantic amount of reference material, graphs, facts. But it’s not profitable. All the “charm” of the conspiracy theory version of these two authors is being killed.

    Nobody takes or quotes the rare book published by GEOCHIM about soil. Where soils were examined from a scientific point of view. and not from Mukhin’s point of view. But on everyone’s lips there is a cry-question: “Where did the Americans put all the photographs, films, hundreds of kilograms of soil? They disappeared - that means they didn’t exist.”

    I don’t want to repeat it for the hundredth time. Anyone who wants to believe that all American victories in space are fiction - let him believe it. The question of faith is for the priest...
  87. 0
    31 August 2015 01: 15
    But we just can’t decide what we need in space and what to fly there with. We don’t really need the ISS - we rolled out all the programs for orbital stations back under the Union. The most we need for a station in orbit is a shipyard for assembling ships or a transfer point from a shuttle to an interplanetary spacecraft. And to assemble the interplanetary, no special assemblers are needed - it can be assembled from large blocks automatically. We now have some kind of imitation of activity and earning money as a cab driver.
  88. +1
    31 August 2015 07: 44
    Quote: Izotovp
    We don’t really need the ISS - we rolled out all the programs for orbital stations back under the Union.

    You can never break everything in. New ones are always appearing

    Quote: Izotovp
    The most we need for a station in orbit is a shipyard for assembling ships or a transfer point from a shuttle to an interplanetary spacecraft.

    This means that not all programs have been tested, since they are still needed for this.

    Quote: Izotovp
    And to assemble the interplanetary, no special assemblers are needed - it can be assembled from large blocks automatically.

    Automatic mode is of course good, but an operator is always needed. How many hundreds of times have we carried out dockings in space, but there have been cases when the presence of astronauts helped to carry out docking when the automation was powerless. Otherwise, when assembling such an interplanetary, one failure could be fatal.

    Quote: Izotovp
    We now have some kind of imitation of activity and earning money as a cab driver.

    Scientific work is still going on, it’s just that the “novelty” has disappeared, expeditions are long, so events in orbit do not arouse as much interest as they did 40 years ago. In addition, the disastrous 90s led to the fact that our part of the ISS program was not completed, our segment is not complete. And most of the scientific equipment is in the American and European segment. In addition, they went to modify the hatches of their segment. Now they are almost like the doors on airplanes. This means that scientific equipment can be washed larger because there is no such limitation as the diameter of the hatches in our segment
  89. 0
    31 August 2015 10: 47
    I recalled an old joke.
    Sitting by the fire, two Indians are talking, eating fried meat. One says to the other:
    - I don’t like our leader for some reason...
    The second says:
    - Do not like it - do not eat!
  90. 0
    31 August 2015 10: 49
    To understand the whole paradox of the situation with space, it is enough to buy a modern children's encyclopedia about space on the pages of which there is simply no mention of Roscosmos (except for Yu Gagarin).

    It turns out that all research and flights are carried out by NASA
  91. ZKB
    0
    31 August 2015 14: 09
    If they don't want to pay, let them walk. I propose that Roscosmos hire more conductors so that ticketless people are dropped off halfway through the journey.
  92. 0
    31 August 2015 14: 34
    Korolev, who dreamed of Unions, would be pleased to learn that Americans now have to pay for flights on them.
  93. 0
    31 August 2015 14: 39
    Charlie can understand, so much money floats past his hands. For this reason, you can complain to Congress))
  94. 0
    31 August 2015 15: 23
    I look and see that you have tried everything here, both trampoline and on foot, etc., but you have forgotten the good old method, which was invented a long time ago and described by Rudolf Erich Raspe in his immortal work “Baron Munchausen”! True, there he flew on a cannonball to reconnaissance and back, but then he was going to the moon! Why don’t the Americans try this method of delivering their astronauts (they don’t have cosmonauts) to the ISS? The main thing here is that you don’t mess with the amount of charge!
  95. 0
    31 August 2015 15: 34
    Yeah, YuMZ has been falling apart for 25 years, so well that the engine can no longer be made.
  96. AntonioPt
    0
    31 August 2015 18: 27
    Do many have problems?

    - At work

    - In family

    - In health

    - In love


    Problems are a component of your life. However, all problems are easily solved.

    To do this, just look at what you are doing and bring out a common denominator that brings discord to the quality of your life.

    It so happened our society that everyone needs money !!!

    Money gives what you are missing.

    - Freedom. Freedom of choice, freedom of movement, freedom of thought.

    - Health. When you have enough money, you worry less, get nervous, so spend less health. You can easily be treated in the best clinics in the world. Learn the secrets of recovery, lead a healthy lifestyle.

    - Love. Love is one hundred percent responsibility for the happiness of another person. But how can one make a person happy if own happiness is a big question. A poor man cannot love, because there is nothing to give him !. His thoughts are preoccupied with the fear of losing his job, the fear that the other half will not survive and will go to the other. Fear that love ends because all the time, all thoughts and all attention are occupied with how to make money.

    These are not obvious facts, but there are other, more commonplace ones, but we will return to the most interesting.

    How to get money and all the components? Need to sell something!

    Goods, Time, Services. It’s good if you have something to sell!

    And what if there is nothing to sell, then you need to use what you have.

    1. If you have already fixed income, You can direct part of the funds to investments. Even if the amounts you measure are small. The discipline itself, stingy with interest on investments, will provide an opportunity to get a new goal that will help you raise your self-esteem, confidence in the future, and possibly revise your future plans.

    We choose a modern, highly profitable investment tool.

    We are aware of the fear that prevents a person from making a choice in favor of investing.

    We make a decision and set off on a pleasant path of financial independence.

    (Today, the PAMM account is considered to be the leading investment tool in the market. What is a PAMM account can be read here:

    http://www.bankcreds.ru/what_is_a_pamm_account.htm )

    2. If your income is very small, then you need to invest your time. To do this, you must also use a modern tool and use it to your advantage. Take the liberty of choosing a new profession for yourself. You can easily see that you can do it by looking at the old story about the king of stock futures: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5_IhfFkAE), where ordinary people from the street earned billions of dollars, without much knowledge.

    We choose a modern, highly profitable, working tool.

    We are aware of the fear that prevents a person from deciding in favor of a new profession.

    We make a decision and set off on a pleasant path to financial education.

    Go to the website http://www.bankcreds.ru/, select the best investment tool and go ahead to your dreams.
  97. AntonioPt
    0
    31 August 2015 19: 46
    Do many have problems?

    - At work

    - In family

    - In health

    - In love


    Problems are a component of your life. However, all problems are easily solved.

    To do this, just look at what you are doing and bring out a common denominator that brings discord to the quality of your life.

    It so happened our society that everyone needs money !!!

    Money gives what you are missing.

    - Freedom. Freedom of choice, freedom of movement, freedom of thought.

    - Health. When you have enough money, you worry less, get nervous, so spend less health. You can easily be treated in the best clinics in the world. Learn the secrets of recovery, lead a healthy lifestyle.

    - Love. Love is one hundred percent responsibility for the happiness of another person. But how can one make a person happy if own happiness is a big question. A poor man cannot love, because there is nothing to give him !. His thoughts are preoccupied with the fear of losing his job, the fear that the other half will not survive and will go to the other. Fear that love ends because all the time, all thoughts and all attention are occupied with how to make money.

    These are not obvious facts, but there are other, more commonplace ones, but we will return to the most interesting.

    How to get money and all the components? Need to sell something!

    Goods, Time, Services. It’s good if you have something to sell!

    And what if there is nothing to sell, then you need to use what you have.

    1. If you have already fixed income, You can direct part of the funds to investments. Even if the amounts you measure are small. The discipline itself, stingy with interest on investments, will provide an opportunity to get a new goal that will help you raise your self-esteem, confidence in the future, and possibly revise your future plans.

    We choose a modern, highly profitable investment tool.

    We are aware of the fear that prevents a person from making a choice in favor of investing.

    We make a decision and set off on a pleasant path of financial independence.

    (Today, the PAMM account is considered to be the leading investment tool in the market. What is a PAMM account can be read here:

    http://www.bankcreds.ru/what_is_a_pamm_account.htm )

    2. If your income is very small, then you need to invest your time. To do this, you must also use a modern tool and use it to your advantage. Take the liberty of choosing a new profession for yourself. You can easily see that you can do it by looking at the old story about the king of stock futures: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZH5_IhfFkAE), where ordinary people from the street earned billions of dollars, without much knowledge.

    We choose a modern, highly profitable, working tool.

    We are aware of the fear that prevents a person from deciding in favor of a new profession.

    We make a decision and set off on a pleasant path to financial education.

    Go to the website http://www.bankcreds.ru/, select the best investment tool and go ahead to your dreams.
  98. 0
    31 August 2015 20: 27
    Quote: kartalovkolya
    Why, for the sake of “momentary” benefits, sell to our most ardent “not quite friends” rocket engines, which they, with some probability, can use not only “for peaceful purposes”, but also for military nuclear missiles?

    For combat missiles? Well, my friend, you're kidding. The last liquid-propellant combat missile, especially one with such a fuel pair, was withdrawn from service 50 years ago

    Quote: kartalovkolya
    And this whole idea with the ISS seems to have outlived its usefulness (at least we don’t really need it), we haven’t acquired new technologies, and being a “taxi driver” is not a rewarding job! It looks like it’s time to sink it (the ISS) in the Pacific Ocean (like our World), but you can always find a good reason (especially since they say that its own new station is already on the way)!

    We can only heat our own segment, which has a mass of 48,5 tons out of the station’s 417 tons. They say that a new station is on the way? Damn, we can’t complete the modules for the ISS, we keep postponing the launch time, and someone is already dreaming of a new station

    Quote: kartalovkolya
    Land, land the “minke whales” in full! It’s the same for me, a space country, but it sends astronauts on foreign ships, like Mongolia...

    Damn, maybe stop raving about jingoistic categories? It is still unknown who can completely land who. We are Americans or Americans are us. Just for fun, count how many astronauts they sent on their ships and how many on ours. And how many times more their astronauts are than our cosmonauts. And think about how the production of our RD-180 superengines will collapse if the Americans refuse to buy them right now. What will happen to the production, to the personnel... Or, to spite my grandmother, I will freeze my ears. And the fact that they are now flying on our ships, by the way, not many astronauts have been delivered to the ISS - this is temporary. How will we look after they start flying seven-seater ships in a year or two, and we start flying these in 10 years?
  99. 0
    1 September 2015 12: 44
    There is a crisis in the space industry. We fly on developments from the late 60s early 70s. The Americans and their shuttles have lost the technology for building disposable rockets. Where are those legendary designers like Korolev, Chelomey, and even Brown...
  100. 0
    1 September 2015 13: 13
    Quote: i80186
    Probably worth taking in gold instead of dollars. Well, or for example in the carousel at worst.



    and if they don’t agree, let them jump from the trampoline, as Rogozin advised them! good