Yankees, go home! Kyrgyzstan liquidates US air base

67
Yankees, go home! Kyrgyzstan liquidates US air base


On Monday, the elected president of Kyrgyzstan, Almazbek Atambayev, said that the US airbase at Manas airport would be closed. Atambayev said that he considers the location of any military facilities on the territory of Bishkek International Airport to be absolutely unacceptable, saying literally the following: “Bishkek Airport is civilian, and it should be engaged in civilian traffic. I have bad associations when I land on the airfield where military aircraft are located. ” Atambayev motivates the closure of the airbase primarily by considerations to ensure the security of his state and his unwillingness to make Kyrgyzstan an object of possible attack from the enemies of the United States. Atambayev did not rule out that in the event that the next American operation in the territory of Eurasia began, for example against Iran, his country could be the object of a strike from a state that had been subjected to American aggression. The statement about the imminent closure of the American military base was one of Atambayev’s first statements after winning the presidential election held in Kyrgyzstan on Sunday, in which Atambayev gained more than 60% of votes, overcoming the competition of more than a dozen more or less serious opponents.

Over the past 5 years, the impending liquidation of the airbase is already the second voluntary or unwitting, but very major success of Moscow’s foreign policy in Central Asia in terms of weakening US influence in the region. In 2006, the Americans had already left their air base in Uzbekistan.

Despite Atambayev’s assurances that the elimination of the airbase is not related to the fact that Kyrgyzstan is under any pressure from Russia, its closure is a significant event in stories Kyrgyzstan and largely determines the further development of the country.

Talk about the possible closure of the air base has been going on for quite some time. In 2009, the former president of Kyrgyzstan, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, had already promised to close it, but he backtracked after the Americans agreed to raise the rent for being in Manas three times. This agreement backfired Bakiyev with violent popular unrest in Kyrgyzstan, as a result of which Bakiyev had to leave the presidency, since one of the accusations against him and his family was the accusation of profit from making illegal deals with jet fuel around the airbase.

Recall that last month V.Putin and A.Atambayev held a conversation, during which Atambayev said that Kyrgyzstan was interested in joining the Customs Union, after which Kyrgyzstan was officially announced this desire. This fact once again proves that the construction of the Eurasian Union is going very fast, because there have been no serious conversations about the possible entry into its structures of any other countries besides Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, until recently.

Gathering a single Eurasian space is, of course, a very difficult process, which has encountered and will face small obstacles and some resistance from representatives of regional and local elites who have their own selfish interests, who managed to cash in on pulling away the remnants of the Empire that collapsed in 1991 and did not want to part with their contented and prosperous position. That is why Atambayev pays special attention to the fact that Kyrgyzstan will “consider in detail each item” of the agreement on joining the Customs Union.

One of these points will be a point related to the smuggling of Chinese goods from the territory of Kyrgyzstan, which is one of the main sources of income not only for local oligarchs, but also for the state itself. Kyrgyz traders addicted to Chinese smuggling are, of course, very frightened by their country's entry into the customs union. They do not understand what awaits their business in the future. These people can certainly be understood. During the years of its independence, Kyrgyzstan completely lost its own light industry in the normal sense of the word, firmly hooked on the Chinese sewing needle. However, the situation is far from a dead end. Getting out of it is banal: Kyrgyzstan is quite able to play the role of a sewing workshop for the entire unified space now being created. This allows both its geographical position (the possibility of using local cotton raw materials), and the country's availability of labor resources, as well as the possibility of using the remnants of the Soviet light industry located in Kyrgyzstan. Even now, things made in small-scale productions of Kyrgyzstan compare favorably with their Chinese counterparts not only in quality but also in price. In addition, Kyrgyzstan is fully capable of claiming the title of a tourist Mecca for citizens of the future Union, - the nature of Kyrgyzstan is unique. What is worth one Issyk-Kul! The economy of this small country could well exist at the expense of these two industries. Where would all the contradictions and tensions that are now in the region go? It is far from a secret that the root of most conflicts does not even lie in interethnic and interfaith contradictions, but in elementary poverty of the population, unemployment, forcing people to survive, using, among other things, illegal ways of earning, namely the smuggling of not only Chinese rags, but drug and weapons.

Integration of Kyrgyzstan into a single economic space is able to offer a real solution to most of the problems that Kyrgyz have to deal with over the past 20 years. And the refusal of the authorities of this country to cooperate with the overseas military, which is, in fact, the surrender of a small but very significant piece of its territory to a country that is only ready to take, not giving in return anything but miserable green pieces of paper, which are far from Kyrgyz residents are much more beneficial to Kyrgyzstan than harm, resulting in the loss of a few million dollars, which very soon will return to the Kyrgyz as a result of their involvement in the integration processes on the territory Eurasia.
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +26
    3 November 2011 07: 26
    keep it right - Akayev sold to the United States, it's time to drive their Afghan potion carriers
    1. PLO
      +19
      3 November 2011 09: 12
      don't rush to conclusions, let them close first
    2. itr
      +7
      3 November 2011 09: 42
      And if he transfers the base from civilian to military airport?
      How many statements from them have already been!
      Time will tell
      1. Aleksey42
        +12
        3 November 2011 10: 37
        It seems that they will nevertheless close it; it is not without reason that there is talk of Kyrgyzstan joining the Customs Union. For Kyogizia, a vehicle may be more profitable than all rents for airbases. The task of Russia to cover up this matter from a political point of view so that our partners are not left face to face with the United States.
        1. Russian Man
          -16
          3 November 2011 11: 31
          Our partners.... lol
          Putin, log in
          1. Tjumenec72
            +12
            3 November 2011 14: 03
            well not yours
            you have no partners, you would only rob
          2. Aleksey42
            +10
            3 November 2011 18: 55
            Write in Russian, if you are already called Russian.
        2. Don
          +4
          4 November 2011 14: 55
          Quote: Aleksey42
          there is talk of Kyrgyzstan joining the Customs Union

          Already, it seems, the Kyrgyz said that they would definitely enter.
          1. Aleksey42
            +4
            4 November 2011 18: 45
            Well, when he enters, then it won’t be more precise! fellow
    3. His
      +2
      3 November 2011 12: 03
      This has already passed with Bakiev. Russia will be divorced to grandmas, and the base will be
      1. Tjumenec72
        +5
        3 November 2011 14: 11
        I think in terms of entry into the vehicle there is still a fad about foreign bases
  2. Sergh
    +24
    3 November 2011 07: 34
    Yes, Issyk-Kul is beautiful, I was there under Chalpon-Ata!
    Atambayev says the matter, of course, in other words, but the Pindos in our bottom are completely unnecessary, uniquely.
    It is time to collect these fragments even in the customs, at least in any, but alliance. The main thing is to be supervised, otherwise they don’t know why! Then again shit to us to rake, yes to us.
    1. Tjumenec72
      +2
      3 November 2011 14: 07
      Well, like small children, followed by an eye and an eye)

      PS I burned down in Issyk-Kul (to the bloodshed already), although the lake is gorgeous kaneshna
      1. 0
        4 November 2011 13: 03
        Quote: Tjumenec72
        I burned down in Issyk-Kul (to the bloodshed already)

        Drove to freebies wink We used to go there for the weekend.
  3. +17
    3 November 2011 08: 12
    A news that cannot but please! It is necessary to quickly resolve all issues that impede the integration of Kyrgyzstan into the CU. Soon, the US will begin to make the most active efforts to destabilize the internal situation in this country - in this they have become more advanced. It seems that Atambaev is quite determined to move closer to the Russian Federation and, God forbid, so as not to rely on Western nishtyaks. And they will, stopudovo!
    1. Ivan35
      +11
      3 November 2011 18: 27
      I agree Yesaul - the pendos will not leave without a fight - there will be attempts at bribery and riots, and it is necessary to wait for terrorist attacks. But you can't give up - you have to squeeze the enemy out of the "soft underbelly". So we scolded Brezhnev at one time - and after all, if he were resurrected now, he would be crazy about what we had done - the Pendos base in Kyrgyzstan - this is nonsense - a nightmare in reality would be for him
      1. Aleksey42
        +7
        3 November 2011 18: 58
        And imagine the reaction of Stalin! Seriously, you're right, Ivan. NATO generally kindly rarely leaves. CSTO may be useful here.
        1. Marat
          +10
          3 November 2011 20: 54
          Well, I will only join your comments - I agree with Yesaul and Ivan and Alexei - and with all the comments supporting the decision to drive out the pendos. This means that the majority of the people have the same reaction to all this as that of Stalin and Brezhnev - the right reaction is no place for the aggressor bases on our lands
          1. +3
            4 November 2011 13: 04
            they have already stopped the Kirghiz, there were so many conflicts when the Pindos shatters and sticks behind the thorns at the base, but for them all the local pop-pois that can be ignored
    2. Don
      +6
      4 November 2011 15: 00
      But the Kirghiz have nowhere to go. Destabilization is already underway. They started to notice it with the advent of Amer military bases. It seems that Putin promised the new president that if he enters the Customs Union and removes the Pindos base, then with new unrest in the south , under the CSTO agreement, either the Russian troops or the CRRF will be sent, in general, it will help to stay in power.
  4. Motherland
    +6
    3 November 2011 08: 33
    We need to pick up this place
  5. Che
    Che
    +9
    3 November 2011 08: 37
    Well done Atanbaev - Russia will be a little easier.
  6. -1
    3 November 2011 08: 47
    Atambayev just wants to squeeze out the loot again. Either the rollback from Russia for the elimination, or from the Pindos for the extension of the term. In addition, there was a thought that he did not like the joint airfield, then the Pindos should build a new airfield, of course with all the infrastructure and jobs for their Kirghiz. So do not clap clap your hands.
    1. +1
      3 November 2011 09: 02
      In fact, among the Kyrgyz, this is a favorite mantra, promising new investments and loans from Russia.
    2. ESCANDER
      +5
      3 November 2011 09: 08
      And here we have to play a little chess, making the European Union and China white, and the Pindos black.
  7. +4
    3 November 2011 08: 57
    Kyrgyzstan is quite capable of claiming the title of tourist Mecca for citizens of the future Union

    I would love to go to the Kyrgyz brothers living with us in ONE country!
    1. -4
      3 November 2011 19: 10
      You will not have to go anywhere soon, they themselves will come to you with Tajiks Uzbeks. And they will establish their order here, And you say the enemy of the United States?
  8. ESCANDER
    +4
    3 November 2011 09: 03
    Well done boys!
    You need to smoke them from here.
  9. Styx
    -2
    3 November 2011 09: 05
    Atambayev has eggs ..
  10. +1
    3 November 2011 09: 45
    I agree with olp - wait and see! Kyrgyz, as it was already, can bargain. I was in Issyk-Kul 3 years ago. They do not like Russian, rather, they are afraid and quietly hate. Those factories and enterprises that remained from the USSR were looted up to the old rusty nails, which, along with all old household goods, are traded along the roads on weekends. They don’t really want to work. I really want to believe that Atunbayev’s words will not be a dumbbell. There are prospects for fruitful cooperation. The same Issyk-Kul, Zhiti-Ogus, Semenov gorge and other places under the Soviet Union flourished.
    1. Aleksey42
      +4
      3 November 2011 10: 42
      I don’t know where you met the Kyrgyz, who quietly hated the Russians, and even in Issyk-Kul. To the south, yes, almost primitive people live there, but the north of Kyrgyzstan is quite normal people. Where they can, they cheat, there is this, they don’t get impudent at all. In Alma-Ata it will be tougher. And the enterprises were really destroyed, and, most importantly, many qualified specialists left, and this is very difficult to make up for.
      1. 0
        3 November 2011 12: 12
        Mostly on the south coast. But in Bishkek, too, there were unkind glances. But the Russians, Tatars (they are also called Russians there) from those who live there are unusually friendly, sympathetic, friendly people.
      2. Ivan35
        +2
        3 November 2011 18: 22
        I will support Alexey! I also constantly rested on Issyk Kul and visited Bishkek a lot. In general, the nation is pro-Russian - almost Kazakhs. A huge difference from Uzbeks and Tajiks is where there really is anti-Russian sentiment. During the riots recently - everywhere on TV there were posters - We are with Russia, etc. The majority of the people are definitely focused on Russia and against the Pendos and the Chinese. It is a sin to push them away. Yes, a poor country, of course - but let's consider them as an "attachment" to rich Kazakhstan - in total, it still turns out to be a plus
        They can become a cheap workshop - why feed the Chinese - better than their Kyrgyz - and Issyk Kul will rise immediately due to tourists from Kazakhstan and Russia
        They have complete friendship with Kazakhs and love historically - these peoples always sympathize with each other - it was just that one turned out to be oil and the other didn’t.
        1. Aleksey42
          +3
          3 November 2011 18: 54
          It can be added that a large number of Russians live in the republic (mainly in Bishkek), and a lot of people in the second and third generation, many do not know, but Prezhevalsky was the first to describe these lands and compile maps, and was buried on the shore of Issyk-Kul. That is, we have a very long history of relationships.
          1. Marat
            +5
            3 November 2011 21: 02
            I agree with Ivan and Alexei - mostly the people are still Soviet - although 20 years have passed - but still there is a huge difference in mentality with other "Central Asians" - this is not Uzbekistan, where everyone has already been forgotten and not Tajiks - this people will be easy to return to the family Union. Russians and Russia as a whole have a very good attitude - and they treat Kazakhs as if they were relatives - in fact, we are almost one people

            The main question, of course, is financial - but we must act as in the Soviet Union - to create domestic production (rather than haul from China and Turkey) and the domestic market - that is, we and the Russians must once again buy sewn goods in Kyrgyzstan and go on a trip to IssykKul - instead in order to feed potential adversaries China and Turkey
            1. +2
              4 November 2011 13: 53
              the guys, apparently confusing something, the new generation in the majority HATES Russians and Russia, the Soviet period is not called colonization in schools, more and more often they advise to blame Russians, believe a person born and living 38 years in Almaty, a person whose ancestors were among the founders of the Faithful
        2. 0
          4 November 2011 13: 50
          Quote: Ivan35
          In general, the pro-Russian nation is almost Kazakhs.

          as for the pro-Russian nation and almost Kazakhs, look here, optimism will immediately decrease http://rus.azattyq.org/
          1. Ivan35
            0
            4 November 2011 16: 52
            I myself live here Vladimir (in Alma Ata) and neither I nor many of my Russian friends see any particular problems. And we always went to Issyk Kul - we just stopped two years because of unrest - and here we have a normal life
            There are plenty of Kazakh friends - no problems. For any unite - everything will form
            1. 0
              4 November 2011 19: 41
              let's not be cunning
              in Kazakhstan today, a Kazakh can say quietly - "I don't like going to Russia", the national question in Kazakhstan is very, very acute, and this abscess will burst at the same hour as the Nazik plays in the box.
            2. 0
              9 November 2011 16: 19
              We are talking about the Kyrgyz and not about the Kazakhs.
              1. 0
                9 November 2011 17: 07
                the difference is not very big, and the region is essentially the same
  11. 0
    3 November 2011 09: 56
    Unfortunately, most likely this is a PR statement. I would not want to think so, BUT!
    As it was said in one well-known film - "East! Is a delicate matter, Petruha". And, as the previous speaker put it, - Atambayev has eggs, and not only ...
    Once again, I would not want to think so .... BUT!
  12. 0
    3 November 2011 10: 02
    ATAMN - Man !!!
  13. +3
    3 November 2011 10: 14
    In principle, there is nothing surprising, if the Pindos really leave Afghanistan, then they don’t seem to need a base. About the economy of Kyrgyzstan - the Toktogul hydroelectric station is not mentioned, in what condition it is now, before, Kyrgyzstan sold the energy it produces.
  14. nnnnnnnnn
    +2
    3 November 2011 10: 53
    So wait for changes in Kyrgyzstan, Atambayev is a political weather vane, another speech to ask Russia for his presidency and calmly serve his term on the throne at the expense of the Russians, but I don’t remember about the base that the owner would kill a dairy cow, I mean people sitting on contracts with the Pindos to ensure the base will allow him to do this ..
  15. raf
    0
    3 November 2011 10: 59
    Fresh tradition, but hard to believe! (Yes, and tradition has long been no longer fresh).
  16. boos24
    +3
    3 November 2011 12: 20
    one of the victories of Russia against NATO is a good start to smoke NATO from Eurasia
  17. gale
    +1
    3 November 2011 15: 07
    They will close it in Kyrgyzstan, open somewhere else, NATO needs this region, without its presence it will not leave it
  18. SIA
    SIA
    +2
    3 November 2011 16: 34
    Well done Atambaev! Drive Pindos to the house, to the hut.
  19. sirToad
    +4
    3 November 2011 17: 08
    if only words did not run far from deeds. and then the spell about "drive the Americans out of Manas!" lately it sounds not the first time, but how it comes to implementation - excuses begin about a long penis and a short shirt
  20. +4
    3 November 2011 18: 47
    On Monday, Kyrgyz President-Elect Almazbek Atambayev said the US airbase at Manas Airport would be closed.

    The United States does not forgive such spitting in the back! I think soon problems with the opposition will begin in Kyrgyzstan and the US will be interested in human rights in the first place!
  21. Citizen
    +3
    3 November 2011 20: 01
    Good news... winked
    drive them from all over the post of the USSR!
  22. +1
    3 November 2011 22: 26
    Oh, I’ll come home, get enough sleep, the American soldier thought)
  23. zczczc
    +1
    4 November 2011 03: 12
    I don’t understand why you are happy - the Kirghiz have already sold the phrase "we are closing Manas" for $ 2 billion, gratuitous aid ($ 150 million) and debt relief ($ 180 million). And that was in 2009.

    Keyword - promised to close in 2014 year! And for this "later" we give another $ 2 billion. For $ 4,33 billion without guarantees - it seems kind of dumb. Would bring it out right now - another conversation. Wise Roza Isakovna, this is the one that Otunbayeva played on 3 sides - for Russia, for the United States and for the Kyrgyz, it seems, but she did not remove the base, although there were so many words ...

    There are 5 people in Kyrgyzstan, taking into account those who earn in Russia. We gave them $ 482 per person, and the Pindos go and go there. If they throw it again, what will Putin do? :)
  24. baluru72
    +1
    4 November 2011 03: 25
    HELPING THE KYRGYZS SHOULD ,,, PUSH NOW TO MOVE ,,,
    1. zczczc
      +1
      4 November 2011 15: 23
      baluru72, it is necessary. But we must not be allowed to be used. In the current situation, when one of their president just kicked us, and the other "both ours and yours," it is simply indecent for them to take anything at all - they would first kick out the Pindos, and then, so they would get the money.

      They took, measured the air pollution in the airport area, conducted a study of the thorns and closed them for "non-compliance with environmental requirements." Over there, Onishchenko committed atrocities as he wanted to the tune of others.
  25. kostya
    +1
    4 November 2011 05: 50
    right! let them be based on bermuda
    1. SIA
      SIA
      +1
      4 November 2011 06: 10
      There is Cuba nearby, what are you? The Cubans and Fidel will cheer them up in the ass, like let’s bring them home.
  26. enemy
    +1
    4 November 2011 13: 04
    it's just bargaining, grabbing more money from the US.
  27. nnnnnnnnn
    +3
    4 November 2011 17: 37
    Dear Ivan35, Marat, in what status do you see Kyrgyzstan as an annex to Kazakhstan as a workshop for sewing consumer goods? So they are doing this, as another area? no thanks, grabbing your south. As a confederate state? so we give them money. And as for the base, Bakiev also started from this, as you don’t understand, well, they won’t succeed because of a number of objective and subjective reasons that you know very well. The CU is beneficial for migrant workers working in the Russian Federation and the Kyrgyz Republic, since for these people border problems are solved, etc., and for management you can always ask for money to solve your problems, but for Kyrgyz people working in Kyrgyzstan in particular in the Dordoi market (low duties with China) so this is complete ruin. So until the Kyrgyz people solve their internal economic, interethnic problems, it is too early for them to join the CU. For example, all the summits held in Bishkek within the framework of the SCO are funded by China, the Russian Federation, KZ, the CIS again the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, the CSTO again the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan so draw conclusions that the Yankees go home in Kyrgyzstan need money for 6 years of presidency who is bigger.
    1. Aleksey42
      +3
      4 November 2011 18: 44
      nnnnnnnnn, you are right in many respects, but understand, Kyrgyzstan is still part of the Russian Empire, and it is imperative to pull it up to you. Firstly, the presence of NATO military bases in our "underbelly" is unacceptable, and secondly, the "rocking" of the internal situation in the republic is also unacceptable (if a mess begins, then first of all, as always, the Russian-speaking population will suffer), thirdly, here there is a huge number of Russian and Russian-speaking population who, in fact, were left to fend for themselves. As for the economy, neighboring Kazakhstan invests a lot of money in Kyrgyzstan with which we are closely integrating, this fact alone should push our countries towards economic cooperation. I don't know how it is now, but before there were many joint ventures with Korea. By the way, Kyrgyzstan is very rich in natural resources, in the USSR they deliberately did not touch them, so as not to violate the beautiful nature of these places. Undoubtedly, we have a very difficult path of unification ahead of us, but we have to go through it, we have no other choice.
    2. Ivan35
      +1
      4 November 2011 19: 06
      Unfortunately, all these problems have a place to be, and it is difficult to object here nnnnnnnnn.
      Alone, I think Kazakhstan will never pull Kyrgyzstan - no matter what brothers the Kazakhs and Kyrgyz would be.
      But it is also impossible to leave it "ownerless" - all the same, all the problems will remain and plus the pendos will also shake the situation - and the Pendos base must be removed from there anyway

      Migrant workers do not scare me - let them go to us in Alma Ata - work - they are better than the Chinese or Tajiks

      And about the fact that it is necessary to first solve the intra-Kyrgyz problems, of course I agree - their immediate access will probably cause a lot of problems - we have different income levels and stability there - that is, we need a quarantine period - and put things in order there as soon as possible

      In general, sooner or later, it is still necessary to "take them under the wing" not to leave them to the Chinese or Islamists - the only question is in "technique" and timing
  28. nnnnnnnnn
    +1
    4 November 2011 20: 28
    Yes, I understand perfectly well that all this is needed, but ask the Kyrgyz themselves if they want this? for 20 years of "INDEPENDENCE" the citizens of sovereign Kyrgyzstan know three ways to make money: 1. go abroad, 2. arrange a revolution, and most importantly their leaders do not want this new elections, and again the Yankees go home meanwhile we forget that they are still paid by the Germans, the French, the British, the Dutch and everyone within NATO for the NATO transit point in Bishkek and at the same time do not forget to ask for money from Russia, China, Kazakhstan, and where is this money? for such a state with such a population, it would undoubtedly be a good investment in the economy, and at the same time this state is a WTO member and is recognized by the UN as one of the poorest states in the world. Well, about a part of the Russian Empire is not forgotten, there is no empire, some ruins. The Chinese do not need them nafig read Chinese political scientists, especially the Chinese that they need to take everything from there, I mean the transfer of territories to the PRC. TS with the standard of living in KZ is not very popular now because the process is painful and it will bear fruit in 5-10 years, but with the standard of living of the Kyrgyz and Tajiks, how will it be? I understand the issues of geopolitics, but while the leaders of these behave (as the classic wink a) political prostitutes dialogue is not appropriate.
    http://www.geopolitika.kz/index.php/home
    1. Marat
      +2
      4 November 2011 22: 58
      Welcome nnnnnnnnn!
      Facts and logic always distinguish your comments and here, unfortunately, I can not refute you. All these problems are.
      I am especially worried about the marginalization (I don’t know how to put it better - maybe lumpenization) of a certain part of the population of this native (for us Kazakhs in particular) republic. When you look at these eternal rallies with shouting activists (in fact, representing a certain clan or local "princeling"), sometimes I myself doubt whether there will ever be order there. The management also has an element of polyprostitution.

      Well, you yourself can see my position very well from my comments - I agree with all those who support the involvement of Kyrgyzstan in the ongoing integration process. As you yourself said - "Yes, I understand perfectly well that all this is needed ..."

      Probably just with Kyrgyzstan it will be harder and more expensive (for Russia and Kazakhstan in the first place) It is necessary to work with the population, tightly control the government and their clans, at the same time build the economy so that at least they start to feed themselves the service - the resort business, let them sew instead I don’t know about the Chinese on our market - it can create privileges for them in the Kazakhstan labor market - let there be more migrant workers from the Kyrgyz and a little less Uzbeks and Tajiks - since the Kyrgyz are still a priority - something else ...
  29. Municipality
    +2
    4 November 2011 20: 43
    Marat
    should once again buy what was sewn in Kyrgyzstan and go on a trip to IssykKul - instead of feeding potential opponents China and Turkey
    The right thought, I’ll put a plus for you
  30. wow
    +1
    4 November 2011 21: 59
    With what satisfaction I would walk from AKM along this yawning rank of Pindos. Hands itch !!!
  31. Municipality
    +5
    4 November 2011 22: 24
    Is there such a country on earth that includes amers and it has become better? Something doesn’t work right away, can anyone remind me? Okay, I’ll ask the question differently. And in how many countries did the amers come (influence) and there it got worse? Count comrades and gentlemen, starting in the 19th century, more than a dozen countries are recruited there (do not forget about the indigenous population of America, they can be called the first when counting). So the very vryatli of the Kyrgyz will become better from the presence of amers. They never come with good intentions (they hide behind them) they always come with very pragmatic, I would even say selfish, goals and their achievement is not disdain. So the head of Kyrgyzstan turned in the right direction.

    zczczc
    If they throw it again, what will Putin do?
    I think the GDP is no more stupid than you and my memory does not suffer; I found a lever. Although we wait and see.
    1. zczczc
      0
      5 November 2011 02: 00
      MunicipalityGod forbid. So far it has not worked.
  32. L. konstantin
    0
    5 November 2011 02: 09
    new president! new requests! In my opinion, Pindos just need to raise the rent!
  33. mitrich
    0
    5 November 2011 18: 31
    I would still wait with enthusiasm until the complete closure of this base. I remember that Bakiyev had already promised to close Manas for the Americans by 2012, received $ 300 million in aid for this case, after which he safely stole all this money together with his son. The base remained, only it was renamed as a transit point. It seems to me, and Bakiev bit off the amers. Now he is "Christlike" in Belarus ...
    I don’t know Atambayev, I haven’t read anything incriminating about him, I will not indiscriminately complain about the new Kyrgyz president. We will see...
    "The word is not a sparrow. If it flies out, you won't catch it." Remember smile ?
  34. patriot64
    +1
    5 November 2011 20: 44
    I haven’t been with the Kirghiz for a long time ... Previously, they were warmly received, now I don’t know .... If you read the new Qur'an, which wahabbits hide behind, why the hell do we need them, let them cut their throats to each other, if they stayed right, we need to support the brothers! arrogant, they will tear out a bone from the throat even of a beggar, explaining that they bring their own democracy to that beggar. So let them go to hell, overseas goats! All wars are only from them! And our boys died in Chechnya not without their participation - they rest in peace and blessed memory !!!
  35. mib1982
    +1
    5 November 2011 23: 18
    COLLECT THE AMATEURS AND FELL. AND DO NOT COME MORE, EVEN AT THE GUEST.
  36. patriot64
    +2
    6 November 2011 17: 39
    An old saying goes: "An uninvited guest is worse than a Tatar" I do not want to offend our brothers Tatars, but I think I will be right if I paraphrase: "Worse than an uninvited guest are Americans with their average ... crap"!

    And yet, my friends! Learn to hate a potential enemy - this will give you a huge advantage in confrontation and in battle! Those who dissolve nurses about equality and fraternity in this situation are cowards. Remember me, they will be the first to flee the battlefield!
  37. dobry-ork
    +3
    7 November 2011 01: 14
    Amerikosy so simply will not leave. They will again offer more money for rent or something else
  38. KGB161rus
    0
    9 November 2011 20: 33
    I read somewhere that the base will be closed only in the 14th year, they say they will not renew the contract with America anymore, in short it will be visible there, again the power may change, etc., but in one I agree the United States just won’t leave, they will bite the ground with their teeth, but they won’t leave and why, because the deployment of troops at that airport is strategically important for them.
  39. nnnnnnnnn
    -1
    16 November 2011 18: 30
    One little tradition

    Posted by Storyteller on November 2nd, 2011

    Since the time of Baks Khan, a small, but important tradition arose in Heavenly Beshbarmakia - first of all, in the first sentence of his first speech, the newly elected khans swear by their mother that they will drive out the Ammudukan base “Manaps” to all the Ammudukan features.

    But it is not so much about the inhabitants of the Ammudukan bestiary as about the stereotypes of the Beshbarmak khan behavior. The simple-minded Beshbarmakians have had mixed feelings for Ammudukaniya since those times when, because of their unfortunate base, Manaps, they sucked in love with the Baksoids, kindly turning their backs on democratically-minded, idealistic in their feelings, Beshbarmakians.

    For these courtesies, the Beshbarmakians still do not know whether they are openly disliked, or secretly distrust Ammudukania.

    And to simple Beshbarmakians, this base, in general, is on a drum. They didn’t even smell money for her. But why, nevertheless, the khans of Beshbarmakia, having not yet vowed to serve honestly their own people, already to someone, we will not give names, swear to demolish the base. Why so fuss?

    You can fuss slowly, thoroughly, with dignity. To say about the base, at least waiting for greetings, they say, do not hesitate, your high nobility, as there is a base, it will not be there, we will do everything in the best possible way.

    The Beshbarmakians think that’s now teperich, when Vovan Puteviy has already congratulated Avtomashev on his election victory, after that one could have screwed on the base.

    And on the other hand, if Avtomashev hadn’t screwed on the base on time, that is, in advance, then it might be that Vovan would have frowned and not congratulated him.

    Such a strong male friendship - there are no stronger chains.