Rocket complex "Albatross"

32
The development of the Albatross intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) was carried out by specialists from the engineering mechanical engineering industry from the city of Reutov. The works were initiated by a resolution of the USSR Council of Ministers on February 9 of 1987. The main designer was Herbert Efremov. In 1991, it was planned to begin testing the complex, and in 1993, to begin mass production of this ICBM, however, these plans were never implemented.

The development in the Soviet Union of a new missile system, with the ability to overcome a layered missile defense system, was to become our asymmetric response to the creation of a missile defense system in the United States as part of the PIO program. The new complex was to receive maneuvering, planning (winged) combat units with hypersonic speed. These units should have been able to maneuver up to 1000 kilometers in azimuth when entering the atmosphere on the Karman line at speeds around 5,8-7,5 km / s or Mach 17-22. At the core of the entire Albatross project were proposals for a guided combat unit (UBB), which was able to perform an evasion maneuver maneuver. UBB had to fix the launch of the enemy’s antimissile and implement a programmed evasion maneuver. Elaboration of such UBBs began as early as 1979-1980, in the USSR, work was carried out on designing an automation system for the execution of such an anti-missile maneuver.



The new rocket was supposed to be a three-stage, it was planned to equip it with a cruise block with a nuclear charge, which was able to approach the target at a small height and maneuver near it. Most of the elements of the rocket itself and the installations for its launch were planned to be equipped with serious laser protection weapons and nuclear explosions, to ensure the maximum likelihood of striking an enemy at any level of opposition from his side. The control and guidance system of the Albatross ICBM was autonomous inertial.



As noted above, the project developer was appointed G. A. Efremov. At the same time, the Soviet government attached particular state importance to the project, since at that time it was a serious problem to overcome the missile defense, which was worked out in the United States. Against this background, it seems surprising that the creation of a new strategic complex was entrusted to an enterprise that had never before worked with mobile missile systems and solid-propellant missiles. The creation of a winged combat unit in general was completely new.

Initially, the Soviet designers were looking for the possibility of creating a combat unit that could evade antimissiles, it was from this idea that the Albatross missile development project was born. The combat unit of this ICBM not only carried a nuclear charge, but also had to detect the launch of the enemy’s antimissile in time and activate its own evasion complex. At the same time, the maneuvers had to be very diverse, which was to ensure sufficient unpredictability of the trajectory of movement. A distinctive feature of the new intercontinental rocket was to be that its course was formed at altitudes that did not exceed 300 km. At the same time, it was quite possible to fix the launch, but it was impossible to accurately predict the trajectory and pave the adequate way to counter the missile warheads. The missile was to be equipped with one or several (no exact information) planning cruise units (PCB) with nuclear charges. By inertia, the PKB made a controlled flight in the atmosphere (planning) and was able to reach the object of attack in a large range of heights and from any direction.

By the end of 1987, the draft design of the Albatross ICBM was ready, but it drew criticism from the country's defense ministry. The design of the complex continued until the beginning of 1989. The main reason for the cessation of development on this topic was the doubt in the timing of this project, including due to the problems that accompanied the technical solutions incorporated in the project. Also, the collapse of the USSR negatively affected the project.

Rocket complex "Albatross"


In June, at the meeting held at the NPO Mashinostroenie, the general director of the NGO G. A. Efremov put forward a proposal to turn the Albatross complex into a universal complex for the Strategic Missile Forces of the country - for mobile and mine-based types. However, this proposal has caused strong opposition from other developers of ICBMs in the country - the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering (MIT) and the Yuzhnoye Design Bureau from Dnepropetrovsk. And already in September 1989, in addition to the Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the USSR on February 9, a new solution was issued, which ordered the creation of two new missile systems, the stationary mine and mobile ground rockets based on the three-stage solid-fuel rocket created by MIT, universal for both complexes. for a mobile soil complex "Topol-9". This research topic was “Universal” (RT-1987PM2 / 2Ж2 rocket, later - Topol-M). The complex based in the mine launcher was created at Yuzhnoye Design Bureau, and MIT was engaged in the development of a mobile soil rocket complex. The active development of the Albatross complex in the interests of the Strategic Missile Forces of the Soviet Union was stopped after the conclusion of the START-8 agreement in 65, however, testing of the UBB prototypes did continue. According to another, unconfirmed official information, work on the Albatross complex was stopped even after the preliminary design was reviewed by representatives of the Ministry of Defense in approximately 1991-1.

Anyway, with high probability we can say that the flight tests of the UBB prototypes of this complex were carried out in 1990-1992 years. The launches were carried out from the Kapustin Yar test site using the K65М-Р booster. The first launch was carried out 28 February 1990, "without separation" of the combat load. Later, with the use of developments on the Albatross complex, the NPO Mashinostroeniya began work on the creation of aeroballistic hypersonic combat equipment (AGGB) 4202 project.

Partly, the Albatross ICBM, together with hypersonic units for it, fell victim to the general decline of the country's military-industrial complex at the beginning of the 1990s, which occurred against the background of the collapse of the USSR. But, at the end of the 1990-s with the use of the existing groundwork for this project, work began, which eventually led to the appearance of the Topol-M and hypersonic units for its more advanced modification of the Yars, as well as for other ballistic missiles related to the new generation - "Bulava" and "Sarmat".

Drawing devices ALS-1 and ALS-2 system "Call"


Work on the maneuvering combat units of the Albatross complex was attempted to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes. So, together with the specialists of TsNIIMASH, the engineers of the NPO Mechanical Engineering suggested creating an ambulance rocket-space complex called Priyv on the basis of the UR-100NUTTB ICBM. The complex, which was to be created by the 2000-2003 years, was planned to be used to provide emergency emergency assistance to ships of the sea, which were in distress in the waters of the world's oceans. As a payload for this ICBM, it was planned to mount special aerospace rescue aircraft, ALS-1 and ALS-2. Thanks to the use of these devices, the speed of delivering an emergency kit to a ship in distress could be from 15 minutes to 1,5 hours, and the landing accuracy is ± 20-30 meters. The weight of the cargo, depending on the type of ALS, was 420 and 2500 kg, respectively.

So, the SLA-1 rescue aircraft was able to deliver up to 90 life rafts or an emergency kit. And the SLA-2 rescue aircraft could deliver rescue equipment for marine vessels (sump module, fire module, diving module). In another variant - Robot-rescuer or remotely piloted aircraft.

Information sources:
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-844.html
http://nevskii-bastion.ru/albatross-rk
http://www.arms.ru/stati/raketno-kosmicheskaja-oborona/proekt-albatros.htm
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    28 August 2015 06: 35
    Very interesting article. Now the veil of how our warheads are supposed to break through the US missile defense has been lifted a little. A very interesting complex. I am sure that "Sarmat" in many respects uses the achievements of "Albatross"
    1. +1
      28 August 2015 22: 53
      Quote: D-Master
      I am sure that "Sarmat" in many respects uses the achievements of "Albatross"


      Here is a little about something else - like a "civilian option" from equipping new missile launchers - BB with scramjet engines! laughing
      At MAXS they showed ...
      By the way, a purge layout.
  2. +4
    28 August 2015 07: 34
    Quote: D-Master
    Very interesting article.

    I really liked the information about the space-rocket ambulance complex called "Call", a very interesting idea! After all, with the help of such a complex, not only sea vessels can deliver goods! Two and a half tons of payload, this is a small truck of food and water for people cut off from civilization, what an emergency!
    1. AAV
      -1
      28 August 2015 15: 48
      The article is interesting.
      But, something raises doubts about the economic feasibility of the ambulance complex "Call" ...
      1. 0
        28 August 2015 22: 57
        Quote: AAV
        But, something raises doubts about the economic feasibility of the ambulance complex "Call" ...

        When the Komsomolets nuclear submarine burned and sank, all questions of efficiency and justification ...
        The main thing is to deliver it to the disaster area with the highest possible speed - to the emergency gear!
  3. +2
    28 August 2015 08: 14
    Thanks for the article, I only heard about this complex before.
  4. +3
    28 August 2015 09: 03
    The governors were extended the next service life, but this cannot be done indefinitely, and the country's shield should be just as strong. By 20, we are waiting for Sarmat and Barguzins and Frontiers with YRS in sufficient numbers in the troops.
  5. FID
    +11
    28 August 2015 09: 31
    How many things, unlike the present time, were created in the USSR ... Now, unfortunately, we are using Soviet developments ...
    1. +1
      28 August 2015 11: 50
      Good afternoon.
      Quote: SSI
      Now, unfortunately, we are using Soviet developments ...

      And the USSR used and developed the achievements of the Russian Empire and bent Germany (and the satellites of course).
      From scratch and out of nothing, nothing appears.
      Funny fiction about a black hole in everyday pegmy:The Black Hole is so authoritative that even photons, running past it, approach and respectfully greet. If the photon is clear in life, there are no jambs behind it, then it flies further, a little crookedly, of course, and astronomers notice this. And if he is a low-energy loshara, then the hole will bore him like a frayer and attracts him. Then he comes photon. For it is not shy to show authority to the eyes, if it didn’t come out with energy.
      Well, the RKKSPN "Call" was pretty pleased!
      It is not "axes" to distribute humanitarian aid to democracy.
      A much more serious approach. drinks
    2. +1
      28 August 2015 11: 56
      Quote: SSI
      How much, in contrast to the present time, was created in the USSR ..

      Good afternoon, Sergey Ivanovich. I am glad to see you in good health.
      Great country, great groundwork. hi
    3. +1
      28 August 2015 17: 14
      Practically today, in no country there are breakthrough solutions for rocket engine building. There are no high-energy fuel materials. In fact, a situation was created in the 40s of the last century when piston aircraft came to a standstill.
  6. +2
    28 August 2015 10: 38
    And someone is stubbornly trying to prove that Russia is already designing missiles and warheads. On my own ideas. But no, slamming is easier and declaring your achievements. Guys, you are up to independence, both to the moon or to Mars. When there was a generation gap, the educational system collapsed, the footage disappeared, you just have to use the aftertaste. Rejoice that the USSR was before you, otherwise you would run around with your pants down, not knowing what to cover in the first place: yourself or your Homeland.
    1. 0
      28 August 2015 16: 19
      The United States uses its achievements in the same way, though for some reason it cannot make rocket engines for flights to the orbit of its cosmonauts, so what are you going to bust here? Russia didn’t come from the void, but from the USSR, as its successor, the main production and personnel with schools have always been in Russia, neither in Ukraine has there ever been an atomic school or production of nuclear weapons, nor has there been anywhere else such a concentration of other technologies.
      1. +2
        28 August 2015 16: 55
        The Americans are now bringing the engine with a thrust of up to 500 tons. But the problem is that successfully working at the stand, he does not want to work on a rocket. Apparently, they still can’t create a powerful and lightweight body kit for flight instances of the engine or problems with gas generators.
        1. 0
          29 August 2015 00: 28
          And why do they need an engine with a thrust of 500 tons, when they have RS 25 engines from the Shuttles, they will improve it now, they will use a gas generator from F-1, for a heavy rocket SLS 5 such engines with a thrust of 12 Meganewtons will be more than enough.
          1. +1
            29 August 2015 01: 20
            Vadim 237. Don’t get into the topic. Why do Americans buy RD-180 / RD-185 engines with thrust up to 400 tons and NK-33 engines with thrust up to 175 tons. Here you have an authoritative link; www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/33046 Academician B. Katorgin answers .Knowing your horny stubbornness of a ram into a new gate, I will not answer you anything else.
      2. 0
        29 August 2015 00: 28
        Quote: shans2
        The United States uses its achievements in the same way, though for some reason it cannot make rocket engines for flights to the orbit of its cosmonauts, so what are you going to bust here? Russia didn’t come from the void, but from the USSR,.


        A cart was placed in front of the horse. It was in the USSR that the Russian Empire was reborn, and now the Russian Federation has reincarnated on the ruins of the USSR. Russia as a Phoenix, burning reborn.
  7. 0
    1 September 2015 00: 02
    Quote: shans2
    The United States uses its developments in the same way, though for some reason it cannot make rocket engines for flights to the orbit of its astronauts

    Do not talk nonsense ...

    Quote: Amurets
    The Americans are now bringing the engine with a thrust of up to 500 tons. But the problem is that, successfully working at the stand, he does not want to work on a rocket

    They really bring the 500-ton. And not one, but two. The first RS-84 with a thrust of 512 tons, the second - TR-107 with a thrust of 500. If tests are being carried out now, then only bench ones. I didn’t hear something about the flight

    Quote: Amurets
    Responsible Academician B. Katorgin

    True to this interview for more than 2 years
    1. +1
      1 September 2015 00: 47
      Old26! I read somewhere, but I don’t specifically remember. Perhaps at the level of advertising or the yellow press. I remember that for some reason the turbopumps did not share the necessary performance. Neither the name of the rocket nor the model of the engine were there. Thanks for the news about the TR-107. I heard about the RS-84 engine.
  8. 0
    2 September 2015 09: 19
    Yes, I also heard something out of the way, but again, as you wrote correctly, Nikolai. there were no details. And what about the US engines. They are now developing and modernizing old ones. In particular, they took a reusable engine from the shuttle, changed the control system, fittings on it, made it disposable (and cheaper). Moreover, if the shuttles had engines RS-25, RS-25A and RS-25B, now they are planning to release them in versions RS-25D and RS-25E. I can't say for sure, but the thrust was increased to about 330 tons (from 230 tons). Single chamber engine. Our two-chamber RD-180 provides 420 tons of thrust. In addition, they are upgrading the RS-68 oxygen / hydrogen engine. They make a new RS-83, also oxygen-hydrogen with a thrust of about 350 tons in vacuum, and a new TR-106, of the same power class and also oxygen-hydrogen
    1. +1
      2 September 2015 10: 48
      Yes, the competition is strong. So the Americans are switching to cryogenic fuel, which is serious. I read about the single-chamber RD-190. You don’t know at what stage the work on them is. That. that there was one launch of the Angara on it, this still does not mean anything. By the way, on September 6, the first launch of the Union is planned on the East.
  9. +1
    2 September 2015 23: 46
    Quote: Amurets
    Yes, the competition is strong. So the Americans are switching to cryogenic fuel, which is serious. I read about the single-chamber RD-190. You don’t know at what stage the work on them is. That. that there was one launch of the Angara on it, this still does not mean anything. By the way, on September 6, the first launch of the Union is planned on the East.

    Yes, incl. and cryogenic. They do it slowly, compensating for the lack of engines by buying them abroad. This year EMNIP signed a contract with the USA, according to which we have to supply 60 RD = 181 engines for Antares (instead of NK-33)

    Now, as for the RD-191. You, Nikolai, are mistaken. The "Angara" is powered by the RD-1 engine, not the RD-191 engine. The 190th will be methane. As for flight tests - yes, they are the criterion of truth. Six engines took part in flight tests (one on "Angara-190PP" and five on "Angara-6"). Although in total, he passed over 1.2 fire tests. Yes, and a slightly modernized RD-5 engine with a thrust of 120 tons flew on the Korean launch vehicle, instead of 151 on the RD-170
  10. +1
    3 September 2015 03: 26
    Old26! Thanks for the clarification. I completely forgot that not only the number at the end of the marking but also the comma in the marking means but that is not the point. I looked at what is available for me on fuels and came to the conclusion that there are no engines for long-range astronautics. You can’t get far on chemical engines. Near the Earth’s astronautics: solid propellant rocket engines are a big price per unit of power. A high-boiling liquid propellant engine is less toxic than the specific impulse in view of the low power liquid propellant rocket engine. And it turns out that in the near future we still have oxygen-kerosene and cryogenic engines. Shuttle looked specifically. And it seems to me that instead of solid propellant rocket engines there would be a starting stage like Buran-Energia, the Americans would have avoided many problems. But this is purely my personal opinion.
  11. 0
    3 September 2015 08: 42
    Quote: Amurets
    The shuttle looked specifically. And it seems to me that instead of solid propellant rocket engines there would be a starting stage like Buran-Energia, the Americans would have avoided many problems. But this is purely my personal opinion.

    HZ, maybe they would have avoided. But the Americans have always been ahead in the production of solid fuel. And of course their side accelerator is a masterpiece of scientific and technical thought. They were able to create equipment that allows one batch to fill this solid-fuel booster with fuel. We also had such a project, but at that time we failed to create solid-fuel engines with a thrust of 1500 tons. In addition, Energia still has a universal rocket, the shuttle sidewalls are only for it. Although the projects of the current American launch vehicles provide for various options for such a unit.
    The tragedy of Challenger - yes, it was the fault of TTU, but still 1 time out of 135 flights, that, in principle, happened due to many factors, incl. and weather. Even with us, taking into account the gigantic experience of using liquid "sides", there were cases of their accidents
    1. +1
      3 September 2015 09: 29
      I’m not talking about tragedy. Burning gasket is a difficult incident. The question is different. I know that historically Americans have always been stronger precisely in solid propellant rocket engines. They created unique equipment, they calculated the fuel charge perfectly, with an alloyed pressure increase in the combustion chambers. I think that use they are liquid propellant rocket engines, they could either lighten the system or increase the mass of thrown. That's what I wanted to say. Perhaps we did not reach the level of preparation of the fuel charge or the same energy that we reached in the liquid propellant rocket. It may be incorrect to compare, but if you take rockets The nuclear submarine, it turns out that with the same discharged mass, the R-29rm rocket weighs half as much as the R-39 or the same mass the R-31 missile has about half the range. I am not a supporter of this or that type of missile, each has advantages and disadvantages. I would like to understand in what direction space propulsion engineering will go. Indeed, if there is no breakthrough in the production of energy materials, we will stop there.
  12. 0
    3 September 2015 19: 19
    Quote: Amurets
    Perhaps this is incorrect to compare, but if you take the nuclear submarines, it turns out that with the same discharged mass, the R-29rm rocket weighs half as much as the P-39 or the same mass the R-31 missile has about half the range. I am not a supporter of this or that type of missile, each has advantages and disadvantages. I would like to understand in what direction space propulsion engineering will go. Indeed, if there is no breakthrough in the production of energy materials, we will stop there.

    Alas, there were problems in the 80s. But here's the fun part. Design Bureau Tyurin, which created the R-31, was, in principle, shot down on "takeoff". They had a lot of projects that could take their rightful place. Unfortunately, practically nothing is known about these projects, except for the name, but I think that if the design bureau was able to work, we could get a solid-propellant missile with an acceptable range that is by no means as heavy as the R-39 was. But alas, this is all in the past

    As for space technology. It is difficult to say what their development will be. Liquefied gas engines are approaching, but there you need to look at their specific impulse. It seems to be 20 percent more than the pair of oxygen-kerosene. At one time, there were attempts to use fluoride.
    But all this, in principle, is only an intermediate stage. Only engines with more power (I don’t know which one) will make it possible to study at least the solar system, not to mention interstellar flights
  13. +1
    4 September 2015 08: 36
    Old26! Hello! Windows has flown, I’m urgently restoring it. But unfortunately, not much that I had flew over Tyurin was restored. I know for sure that they worked with fuels based on Bor or some Boric compounds seem to be according to Kondratyuk’s ideas. Americans wanted liquid fuel use on the V-70 Valkyrie and on the SR-71. Even the plant was built. They conducted experiments and with the addition of borate compounds to the solid but the results were tightly classified, on the principle of burning to read. The only thing I know is 100%, this fuel is terribly poisonous. About fluorine I also know. I read about the engine, it seems RD-701 is a pair of Hydrogen-Fluorine. Yes, it has a solid impulse. But the fluorine activity, I can’t imagine how to store it.
  14. 0
    4 September 2015 23: 50
    Quote: Amurets
    Yes, he has a solid impulse. But the fluorine activity, I can’t imagine how to store it.

    Therefore, the topic stalled

    Quote: Amurets
    what I had according to Tyurin ....

    Sorry. Duplicates on an external drive is the best way. Himself in the early 2000s was in the same situation. It was necessary to update Windows, the archive archived, and then 15 of 3 disks did not open
    In general, the Tyurin Design Bureau is still waiting for its chronicler. In principle, what do we know? Only three of its products - 8K96, R-31 and F-22, created on the theme "String". Well, another 18 or 20 indexes with a very short annotation. And that's all. For example, what do we know about SLBMs, which Tyurin's design bureau developed for Project 941. We only know that later on these boats were made by the Makeevskiy P-39s.
  15. +1
    5 September 2015 03: 12
    I have a slightly different situation. The archives are on my hard drives, the folders are in place, but for some reason empty. Not only by rockets. I knew about Tyurin and Dukelsky for a long time. Dukelsky is an engineer of the old pre-revolutionary era, Florensky (brother of Pavel Florensky; bishop and scientist) and a number of others during the creation of heavy artillery railway transporters, the idea of ​​creating a BRZhK was laid. A whole infrastructure was created on the railway to service these trains. Design Bureau Tyurin conducted work on this topic, but I don’t know which ones. Yes, and a subscription. Besides 15P961, there were still trains, I don’t know the details. But during the tests by "carriage" all the numbers of these trains started from zero.
  16. +1
    5 September 2015 06: 17
    Yes! Concerning the activity of fluorine. When electrical equipment with fluorization insulation is on, and I saw a diesel locomotive burning, and yellow-green smoke appears, firefighters at all costs try to bring down the temperature. In order to stop fluoride emission during decomposition of insulation. When this smoke appeared, fluorine displaces oxygen and 130 tons of damn remains in the combustion of two oxidizing media from the locomotive.
  17. 0
    5 September 2015 08: 23
    Quote: Amurets
    Yes, and a subscription. Besides 15P961 there were still trains, I don’t know the details. But during the tests by "carriage" all the numbers of these trains started from zero.

    I don’t know about the rooms, but it’s quite possible. I know that 4 such experimental trains were created: P-150, P-250, P-400, P-450. These trains are complex 15P952, the forerunner of the well-known BZHRK 15P961. how close they were in design say the indices of the cars. At complex 952 they were without the letter A, at complex 961 - with the letter.
    In general, the Yuzhnoye design bureau really developed a large number of BZHRK, starting with the BZHRK with the R-12 missile, well, with the RT-20P, RT-21 (15P941 complex), RT-22 (15P943), RT-23 (15p944 and 15P952 ) and finally with RT-23UTTH (15P961).
    1. +1
      5 September 2015 10: 03
      Volodya! There were projects with the R-29, but something did not grow together. I won’t say what it was on BAM. Most likely 952. The BAM did not have its own specialists who would be allowed to service these trains. Because, in addition to the calculation, which was involved in the launch, we need there were specialists with the appropriate education, well, as you know, with the appropriate approvals for the regulation of trains and repairs. On BAM, most likely there was not the train itself, but a mass-dimensional layout. Even in areas with more or less heavy traffic under it sagging the way. On the Trans-Siberian Railway, it did not stand out at all, since three sectional diesel locomotives and electric locomotives and such heavy-duty wagons are commonplace. In general, there are features on the railway and what they show on television is a laugh. I won’t say whether we had firing or not, most likely not. But these trains came to us. Perhaps mass-dimensional layouts. More about Tyurinsky RT-15. After Damansky, ground-based launch positions were prepared, but not for R-12, but for solid-fuel rockets. Because it was just a foundation pit and a starting ring on the foundation pit. On which a rocket was placed. There was nothing to refuel. There was a second foundation pit in which DESki, KShM, Topoprivazchik took refuge and it seems a communications machine. The collective farmers were very indignant that all this was being built away from the villages. Then they used these positions as silos. Concreted launch positions generally went off with a bang. Gas bumpers were ideally suited for entry and exit. Recently I was in one position, even the concrete did not crack.
  18. 0
    11 August 2023 16: 18
    I read somewhere that because of the SALT-II treaty, Vanguard should only fly in space.
    Previously, there was a warhead R36-orb with warheads, which could fly around space several times, but agreed with the amers to destroy such space-based complexes in January 83rd.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"