Military Review

"Uranus-6": one of the best military robots in the world is not afraid of the most dangerous service

34
"Uranus-6": one of the best military robots in the world is not afraid of the most dangerous service



At the first military-technical forum "Army-2015" held this summer, many different robotic equipment was presented. However, a multifunctional robotic complex URAN-6 occupied a prominent place among the demonstrated samples. Made on a tracked platform, it weighs more than 6 tons.





The machine is designed for making passages in the mine-explosion barriers and areal clearance of territories.

Base machine specifications:
- Weight with a boy trawl - 6,8 t
- Dimensions - mm 4455х2015х1490
- The width of the strip continuous trawling-1,6 m
- The maximum speed of the movement - 5 km / h
- The minimum mass of one GP destroyed was 0,1 kg; Maximum - 4 kg.
Assigned service life -10 years.





A remote control system with a portable remote control provides control in the open area at a distance of 800. The Uran-6 can be equipped with rolling, milling and segmented roller tracks, as well as a dozer blade and a rotary blade.

As the creators of the complex emphasize, when clearing the area of ​​explosive objects, direct contact of the sappers with ammunition during the work on their detection and preparation for destruction is excluded.
Originator:
http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-13192.htm
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Inok10
    Inok10 30 August 2015 01: 32 New
    +8
    .. the use of remotely controlled robotic systems is just necessary in the most dangerous areas of database maintenance ..
    As the creators of the complex emphasize, when clearing the area of ​​explosive objects, direct contact of the sappers with ammunition during the work on their detection and preparation for destruction is excluded.
    .. To the designers, bow low .. hi
    1. ICT
      ICT 30 August 2015 08: 10 New
      +1
      Quote: Inok10
      .. To the designers, bow low ..


      the authors of the articles would not forget to add, from where the authors of this miracle
      As the creators of the complex emphasize,



      The Uranium-6 complex is the development of the multifunctional mechanical anti-personnel mine clearance system (MARMS) MV-4 created on the basis of previous models such as MV-1, MV-2 and MV-3, developed and manufactured by DOK-ING from Croatia. This complex is supplied to a number of European countries and even to the USA
      1. Yars
        Yars 30 August 2015 09: 38 New
        +1
        I agree, the country should know their heroes!
      2. Inok10
        Inok10 30 August 2015 11: 20 New
        +5
        Quote: TIT
        the authors of the articles would not forget to add, from where the authors of this miracle

        .. and it would be necessary to give the source of your information .. The Kiev Gazette of 29.08.14/XNUMX/XNUMX should not be cited as a source .. with this and similar sources, and so everything is clear, it’s the same as referring to the press service of the CIA and the State Department .. laughing
        1. ICT
          ICT 30 August 2015 11: 31 New
          0
          Quote: Inok10
          the press service of the CIA and the State Department.


          laugh, laugh, useful


          13: 11 / 27.08.08

          http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/archive/robot-tral-schik-minnyh-poley-mv-427-08-200

          8-13-11-00 /
          1. Inok10
            Inok10 30 August 2015 11: 59 New
            +4
            Quote: TIT
            laugh, laugh, useful

            .. and where ? screen attached .. laughing .. say 27.08.08/XNUMX/XNUMX?! wassat .. this is what the Chief Designer says:
            The Uran-6 robot sapper was launched at the 766 UPTK enterprise. Andrey Anatolyevich Chekulaev became the chief designer of the sapper robot.
            “This is my first design experience. Work on Uranus-6 began in September 2013, it turns out that in less than a year our car reached the field test. They took place on hard rocky soil - this is the most “difficult” soil, which is assigned the 4th category of complexity, ”Andrei Chekulaev said in an interview with Zvezda TV channel.
            The test results struck seasoned sappers. When the error stated in the factory documents (1-2%), the robot sapper worked at 100% - i.e. did not miss a single mine. No one expected this result.
            .. a source: http://vpk.name/news/128295_odin_za_vseh_universalnyii_robotsaper_zamenyaet_cely
            ii_vzvod.html
            .. strange like that, you have a source from 2008, and design work began in 2013 .. for miracles in turns .. laughing
            1. ICT
              ICT 30 August 2015 14: 33 New
              0
              a space is inserted in the link (compare the numbers and remove the excess, sometimes it happens like I don’t know how to remove it)

              , if I screwed a handout subframe to the field and reinforced the front side members with overlays from the sharp-sighted falcon, I can consider myself a costructor
              VAZ-2121?
              1. Inok10
                Inok10 30 August 2015 18: 06 New
                +4
                Quote: TIT
                a space is inserted in the link (compare the numbers and remove the excess, sometimes it happens like I don’t know how to remove it)

                .. read .. above written in Russian in white .. Work on Uranus-6 began in September 2013 .. everything else from the evil one or an attempt to sew the ears of a dead donkey .. laughing
                1. ICT
                  ICT 30 August 2015 18: 57 New
                  -1
                  Quote: Inok10
                  Work on Uranus-6 began in September 2013.


                  those. you try to prove to me in the morning that this is completely our authentic development


                  , and I look at the photo of 2008 and see the opposite

                  we will remain everyone in our opinion request
                  1. Ze Kot
                    Ze Kot 2 September 2015 00: 41 New
                    0
                    Quote: TIT
                    those. you try to prove to me in the morning that this is completely our authentic



                    A few years ago, in "Top Gear" tested a similar device, standing / standing in service with the British army.
  2. targitai
    targitai 30 August 2015 01: 32 New
    +3
    Why a robot? The operator controls
    1. Izotovp
      Izotovp 30 August 2015 02: 40 New
      +1
      Because it’s easier to call it and more beautiful)))
      In fact, even in this version, non-automatic, a very necessary thing !! Well done designer.
    2. ermolai
      ermolai 30 August 2015 04: 03 New
      0
      Quote: Targitai
      Why a robot? The operator controls

      and the robot is also controlled by someone, on / off, change the program, etc. and this complex is robotic, this is not the same thing for sure. Yes, the main thing is that sappers have less danger.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. sir.jonn
      sir.jonn 30 August 2015 04: 40 New
      +3
      Quote: Targitai
      Why a robot? The operator controls

      In the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, remote-controlled equipment was also called work, so it happened, and it sounds better.
  3. Curt
    Curt 30 August 2015 08: 09 New
    0
    If I remember correctly in the Battle of Kursk, the Germans made radio-controlled wedges with a blade for making passages in minefields - this is the same thing, but after 72 years, and with Spanish. modern technology
  4. family tree
    family tree 30 August 2015 08: 50 New
    +2
    Damn, one supporting what We in the 80s, also on hundredths and hundredths, digested the mount and put one support, as supporting, in the middle, instead of two rollers. Running is similar.
    Many sappers wives looked through their fingers at the fact that their husbands drank for this machine yes
    And in the photo T-130, a hard worker
  5. ICT
    ICT 30 August 2015 09: 40 New
    +2
    Quote: perepilka
    one supporting as supporting


    and what is the point? caterpillar resource or what else?
    1. family tree
      family tree 31 August 2015 17: 58 New
      +1
      Quote: TIT
      and what is the point? caterpillar resource or what else?

      It’s just that the trouble with the support was, more precisely, with the studs on them, that they got out, then this whole node disappears, but the resource is not affected, in principle, by the Caterpillar chip
      1. ICT
        ICT 31 August 2015 19: 58 New
        0
        Quote: perepilka
        with brides on them, that’s why they twisted


        Well then, it is clear
  6. activator
    activator 30 August 2015 11: 09 New
    +2
    Quote: perepilka
    Damn, one supporting. We in the 80s, also on hundredths and hundredths, digested the mount and put one supporting, as supporting, n

    I, too, do not cut through what the tsinus of this Ratsukha explain from what they left and what they achieved this alteration. Is it that one extra and one is enough.
    1. family tree
      family tree 31 August 2015 18: 05 New
      +2
      Quote: activator
      I, too, do not cut through what the tsinus of this Ratsukha explain from what they left and what they achieved with this alteration.

      In the bottom photo, in my opinion, two support instead of supporting. Relatives looked like this
      I wrote above, just threw the assembly out of the range of ordered parts request Now he came to the boutiques and bought, and in the USSR, with spare parts, ask the elderly
  7. fzr1000
    fzr1000 30 August 2015 11: 34 New
    +2
    The engine there is English, tricky, and the steel used for the body was foreign, until they covered the bench because of sanctions. So that "domestic" he is only partly.
  8. Ivan Ivanych
    Ivan Ivanych 30 August 2015 12: 00 New
    0
    The platform was created and this is the main thing. And I think our engine will pick up.
  9. ICT
    ICT 30 August 2015 15: 28 New
    +1
    “DOC-ING is one of the best in the company saving lives and providing a safe environment for the community that is under the mine / UXO threat to the world. I worked with MV 4 in Tajikistan and we cleaned SHA with B.- 4 was about 1,2 million square meters. meters of contaminated territory and neutralized more than 6000 mines and unexploded ordnance.
    My best wishes to you guys who direct their efforts to the development of DOK-ING and do everything possible so that a safe person lives around the world. Good luck and success in your future work. ”
  10. Cap.Morgan
    Cap.Morgan 30 August 2015 16: 01 New
    0
    Now mines are tricky. The central control unit and a dozen combat units are placed around, motion sensors, such a mine analyzes the nature of the target, it does not respond to each according to the program. You’ll clear the horseradish.
  11. Grif
    Grif 30 August 2015 17: 47 New
    +1
    What kind of ugly star on it is painted? Is the red star already canceled?
  12. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 30 August 2015 18: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: Grif
    What kind of ugly star on it is painted? Is the red star already canceled?

    I heard that this is an innovation ---- the colors of the flag of the Russian Federation. But I see that this is not so. Bard.ak some.
    Such a robot! Such power !!
  13. Mentat
    Mentat 30 August 2015 20: 42 New
    +1
    Quote: TIT
    MV-4

    There is no article on the link you provided.

    Here is a photo of MV-4
    Similar? Yes.
    Now take two photos of bulldozers and begin to prove that one is by all means a copy of the other. Good luck in your fruitful endeavors! :)

    Hint: as evidence, you can cite an article on how one of the bulldozers created millions of cubic meters of dumps.

    Obviously, a similar purpose equipment will be similar, because the database has the same technical solutions. How similar planes, helicopters and submarines are. In order to understand who was based on whom, the picture is not enough.
    1. ICT
      ICT 30 August 2015 20: 45 New
      -1
      Quote: Mentat
      There is no article on the link you provided.




      Quote: TIT
      a space is inserted in the link (compare the numbers and remove the excess, sometimes it happens like I don’t know how to remove it)
    2. ICT
      ICT 30 August 2015 21: 05 New
      0
      Quote: Mentat
      that the equipment for a similar purpose will be similar, because the database has the same technical solutions.



      leopard 1 and t72 "Ural" ----- similar lol

      t72ural and t72б3 petrel ---- one continuation of the other with a minimum of differences in the main structural elements

      I don’t understand one thing, why in the production of the raptor with CombatBoat 90, we do not hide who was whose pro-protector, here they stubbornly prove that we made all the drawings ourselves and no nails

      (for today everything, good luck to everyone, I'm in the bathhouse and sleep)
  14. Mentat
    Mentat 31 August 2015 17: 04 New
    0
    ICT, the cars are very similar, I even admit that the Russian one is a complete copy. However, it is also possible that Russian engineers simply used a successful layout, and designed the insides from scratch, the creation of such a cart is a small engineering task.

    You affirm, and I I admit. Do you feel the difference? Your position, by its very nature, is vulnerable, there are “holes” in it, through which you can leak your wrong position. Moreover, you say, if I understand correctly, on the basis of an article in the Ukrainian media. For some reason, you believe them, but do not believe the statement of Russian engineers. Where is the balance, where is the verification of information?
    1. ICT
      ICT 31 August 2015 20: 09 New
      0
      Quote: Mentat
      zero, the creation of such a cart is a small engineering task.

      in the morning I climbed their official sites.
      yes, no, it’s rather easier here just a small desk (docking) and offers its services,
      with the Ministry of Emergency Situations they had a ride, but to go through a sieve of the bureaucracy of the Ministry of Defense "You affirm" rather guess



      as if a set of documents “766 UPTK”

      http://www.766uptk.ru/index.php?do=static&page=dokumentaciya


      but this piece of paper can already be deprived, for a photo session in the wrong place



      session, we didn’t paint CPM with 1993, thanks at least in the close view, otherwise everything is only through Google maps winked





  15. ICT
    ICT 31 August 2015 20: 20 New
    0
    Quote: TIT
    as if a set of documents “766 UPTK”


    there, each piece of Mühlion’s paper five-seven stands officially, plus another 1 on each paw from the top, otherwise they will torture you by running around with documents.
  16. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 1 September 2015 15: 08 New
    0
    And here is his Croatian “dad”.
    MARMS MV-4 is a good car.
    US Army uses 28 units
    for mine clearance in Afghanistan.