MIC-3927 armored car "Wolf"




The new domestic armored car "Wolf", created by Russian engineers, is today one of the first armored cars in modern Russia, assembled exclusively from Russian-made component parts, which means independence from the supply of spare parts from foreign manufacturers. On the basis of the armored car, various modifications are designed and created to perform a variety of combat missions. Currently, four versions of this armored car have been created: VPK-3927 (the first basic configuration with separate protected control module and functional module), VPK-39271 (with combined modules in one), VPK-39272 (transport and cargo armored car for cargo movement and transportation military personnel, with the possibility of installing various additional modules) and military-industrial complex-39273 (as the first option, with separate control modules and an increased cargo module). The first three options have the wheel formula 4х4, the last sample 6х6. Depending on the equipment and equipment of the vehicle, it is planned to use both for combat use and for civilian purposes, in addition to the above armored versions, unarmored vehicles are under development. The main design feature of the new “Wolf” armored car is high unification, which simplifies its manufacture and reduces the total cost of mass production. Against the background of the ongoing conversations about whether to use the Russian special divisions for the as-yet-unfinished “Wolf” or the Italian armored car of the same class “IVECO”, this is an important factor.



All armored cars of the “Wolf” series have spaced, differentiated (reinforced in the most vulnerable and important parts of the hull) armor, with the possibility of installing additional composite hinged armor plates in field conditions by the crew. Multi-layered armor is able to withstand the hit of 7,62-mm bullets from a distance of up to 300 meters, protects the crew and the personnel placed in the airborne module from all types of small-arms fire weapons and from mines and shells. High strength bulletproof glass 68 mm thick, which does not create optical distortions, withstands almost any hit from automatic weapons. Particular attention is paid to the anti-mine protection of an armored car, this is a V-shaped double bottom of the car (according to the developers, the car will withstand a blasting equivalent to 4 kg of explosive (BB), and this is almost the weight of explosive 122-mm high-explosive projectile, which is doubtful the weight of the armored vehicle, which is equal to 7 tons, for example, the BTR-80 weighing more than 13 tons while undermining on such a land mine simply overturns, throwing it into the air), special suspension chairs for the crew and the landing force. As for the chairs to be installed, it can be assumed that they will still be foreign-made, since Russian samples are more expensive. The design of the armored vehicle makes it possible to install, in addition to the machine-gun armament, also light artillery or anti-aircraft. The Yaroslavl 190-strong engine YMZ-534 is installed as a power plant on the new “Wolf”, according to manufacturers, having the potential of upgrading to 300 hp. Independent and adjustable suspension armored car - one of the unusual design solutions implemented in the new project. Due to this, ground clearance can vary from 25 cm to 55 cm. At this point, all the advantages and innovations have been exhausted, which suggests that “Wolf” is another commercial project.

In general, the machine, like all previous ones, the Tiger, the Bear, is intended rather for “combat use” against popular unrest, against a crowd armed at best with light weapons, but not at all to solve serious combat missions army offensive units. Any armor, and even more so light as on these machines, can be pierced, this makes the “Wolf” armored car vulnerable in the event of, for example, repelling an ambush attack. Pay attention to the location of the neck of the fuel tank - what is this? Telling the enemy where to send an armor-piercing incendiary bullet? One of the main tasks of the army armored vehicles is the ability not only to support the assault infantry units with fire, but also to take the crew and troops from the shelling sector. When attacking on the march, leave the defeat zone, allow the landing under the cover of the armor’s standard weapons to dismount, regroup and deploy the unit into battle order to repel the attack, then take part in pursuing, blocking and destroying the enemy. What is the mention in press about the compliance of the engine exhaust with Euro-4 and Euro-5 standards, and for the war with whom this machine was created? In all, this is more of an armored car, created for punitive divisions, and not for the front line, where the enemy is armed not only with light weapons.

MIC-3927 armored car "Wolf"


Author:
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Splin
    Splin 31 October 2011 09: 23 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    BTR-152 BACK !!
    1. Tjumenec72
      Tjumenec72 31 October 2011 09: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      this is not KAMAZ-43269 "Shot" more like a BTR-152)
  2. Owl
    Owl 31 October 2011 10: 50 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The good news is that this is a domestic product, from the engine to the body, it’s nice that this product can “push” its rival IVECO. It is not clear what the designers thought when they were working out the placement of the transported personnel in the passenger compartment, again the placement of their backs to the enemy, it was surprising that there was no loophole for shelling the front of the car and loopholes for the driver and the “senior car” to shoot to the side, is it possible to hatch in the roof of the control compartment use as protection against ammunition fired from a PC machine gun? Unfortunately, everything again seems to be repeating itself: those who develop and those who make decisions on providing these samples do not plan to “work” on these machines themselves.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 31 October 2011 12: 49 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      It is for transport to the place of battle and not for part in the battle, it pleases that we have such machines.
      1. erix-xnumx 31 October 2011 13: 21 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        You will reach the battlefield on the “Wolf”, and then what will you fight on?
      2. Owl
        Owl 31 October 2011 16: 33 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        You are not ambushed on the road (in the city)?
        1. Alexey Prikazchikov
          Alexey Prikazchikov 31 October 2011 22: 26 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          I got there and say I need it, and it is necessary to quickly speed up the Caucasus, they are very needed there. In Chechnya, things have quieted down a little, but in other regions, someone is blowing hard to the coals.
        2. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 01: 00 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          So what? How is this armored car good when hit in an ambush? Do you even know that with a competent ambush, you can burn out a tank battalion? And in the event of a war, will you go on the offensive?
          1. Alexey Prikazchikov
            Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 01: 24 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Now the war has changed, someone will not have to send armada of tanks because they are too vulnerable, and we have a shitty birth rate to fill up enemies with corpses, we must become professionals, fighting in the city using traditional equipment is useless to lead a terrible example to you. And west west, with its last gasp, all they can now groan in our direction about human rights and other garbage, they don’t have money, they don’t have the strength to fight us, plus our soldiers qualitatively surpass them believe me I know what I’m talking about, and even conscience speaking on technology, we simply parity everything beautifully and design it with a new word and that’s all, and inside is also shit, they had a chance in the 94th they didn’t use it now they won’t attack. And they didn’t rob the floor of the world, but inas with you in the 90s to die in a nuclear fire, so relax, no one will not arrange the 3rd world in the next 50 years. Then they wrote us off as a country and were preparing to destroy it, and now all the time we are reluctant and they don’t, they can organize a revolution and put them in a good government, so the army should be prepared for local wars, and there we need this technique because undermining is the main reason the deaths of the guys, and with a grenade launcher in an ambush it’s stupid there is no scumbag, of course, but they don’t live for a long time under the fire of guards quickly come across.
            1. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 02: 29 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Your knowledge of military affairs is limited by the level of squad-platoon. All the stupid ideas that we need to have armed forces only for local wars is the most criminal stupidity aimed at deliberately weakening our army, bringing its level of combat capability to the level of some kind of riot police! Here you are flogging the term "local war" ... Do you even understand what it is in terms of the composition of the warring parties ??? Can you guarantee that a local war will not develop into a regional one, and then into a large-scale or global one ??? Where are these boundaries? That's right, they are not ... And do not give examples of Chechnya, Georgia or even Afghanistan, in terms of scale it was army operations, no more. You need to understand that the time for redivision of the world will come, the climate is changing, the shortage of fresh water and food is growing. Under these conditions, any friend can suddenly become an enemy. In history there has not been a single eternal military alliance. But I do not need to give the example of Grozny - it was not the equipment that was to blame, but the stupidity of the leadership and the frank betrayal of a number of officials. and if you take an interest in it, you will find out that a lot of the tanks burned there didn’t have explosives in the elements of dynamic defense, and those that were equipped normally withstood 6-8 hits from RPGs. I agree that all these "Tigers", "Wolves", "Bears" are needed in the police, internal troops, and sometimes in the army, but to make a battlefield machine out of them is nonsense, worthy of capital punishment. As for the thug with an RPG in an ambush, I tell you that there are various mines, including anti-mortar mines. Our leaders would think about increasing the protection of infantry fighting vehicles or armored personnel carriers, rather than pushing non-swimming, two-bridge cuttlefish into the army.
              1. Foamas 1 November 2011 03: 07 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                erix-xnumx
                I agree with you, all this equipment, for the police, in a real military battle, it has a chance О !!!
                All these "Tigers", "Wolves", "Bears", etc., would have burned in Grozny (94-95g) even steeper than the BTR-70,80 and BMP-1,2
                1. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 03: 28 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Here I am about the same. When conducting a battle in a city, battle tactics are very important, not just the caliber of weapons or armor! The city is fighting by assault groups. Everything else is suicidal stupidity. Moreover, it is in the city that the highest probability of defeat in the forehead, on the side, in the roof, and not in the bottom.
                  1. Alexey Prikazchikov
                    Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 04: 25 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    The army should be under the tasks, and before the claims to world domination, we first need to become a regional power, and not forget how the USSR collapsed due to huge defense spending, but at the same time not make mistakes like Libya. What you are talking about is a war of the past, now the West does not have money for such wars, and people they have, roughly speaking, are not of the best quality, and China can be trampled into shit enough for platinum and nuclear power plants plus a factory to bomb all the scribe, we have tuega hucha TNW with such arsenals no one will trample on us, it’s not good for anyone, but govnyukov like Georgians or inside the country to drive these armored cars like that is enough
                    1. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 04: 49 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      And in what statements have you read the words about world domination? Why should I attribute what I did not say. But you tell about a regional power to Turkey or Iran with Saudi Arabia. Russia, despite all the current and demographic economic difficulties, is a world power along with the United States and China. You said correctly, the army should be created and maintained on the basis of tasks. So, speaking about the tasks of our army, pay attention to the area of ​​our state, its geographical location, and the availability of resources (both renewable and non-renewable). Speaking of defense spending, I do not need to prove that the “Wolf” or “Tiger” is much cheaper than an armored personnel carrier. Once again, such armored cars are needed in limited quantities, but not the battlefield. Yes, and on the cross they are inferior to armored personnel carriers, and even more so BMP. Or do you plan to always fight only on the road?
                      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
                        Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 04: 52 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        that’s how they are done only for light brigades and special operations forces that we plan to create.
                      2. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 04: 59 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Okay, let's start from far away ... Please answer my two questions: 1) Is it right to create three types of brigades and what are they for? 2) Should our special operations forces carry engineering ferry equipment with them?
                      3. Alexey Prikazchikov
                        Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 05: 38 New
                        • -1
                        • 0
                        -1
                        !) DA considered fully OPRAVDONNYM IT and cost effective, and allows us to respond to the threat of various characters such as light BETTER in LAN DUE MRAP AVERAGE hrosho to enter the opertivnost SPACE Kazakhstan for them simply ideal as a battlefield, and the heavy it harder they are in THE GLOBAL WAR WILL BE THE BASIC FIST OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. And WHAT TO THE ACCOUNT OF ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT IN THE MTR I WILL SAY THAT IF EXPRESSIONAL TASKS ARE PUTING YES WELL AS EXAMPLE TO CAPTURE ANY COUNTRY FOR A COUNT OF THOUSAND KM FROM RUSSIA AND THERE IS NOT SIMPLY NECESSARY TO RESCUE.
                      4. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 06: 07 New
                        • -1
                        • 0
                        -1
                        Did something happen to the Caps Lock button, or are you screaming so loudly? And now to the topic of our controversy, in the armed forces there are already connections for specific tasks and conditions (please do not confuse with special forces brigades) - these are mountain rifle brigades, these are air assault brigades, these are marine brigades, and these are the Arctic brigades. Such compounds are designed to perform tasks in certain geographic conditions or rather highly specialized tasks, and there are relatively few of them. The main power is motorized rifle formations. In the days of the USSR, in peacetime, we already had previously created groupings of troops in all threatened areas. These groups were armed, taking into account the composition of the opposing enemy, had all the necessary supplies of materiel, ammunition and military equipment. In modern conditions, the country's leadership declares that we need to have a small but highly mobile army, the compounds of which can be transferred from one theater of operations to another. in addition, it was envisaged that a number of such compounds would arrive without equipment, receiving it on the spot from storage bases. But creating various types of brigades, we ourselves limit our ability to maneuver forces and means! For, for example, your light team will be completely unnecessary where you need a heavy one. Or why do I need in the Far East or Siberia your brigade from Kalmykia in non-floating jeeps? Equipment should be as unified and passable as possible. Why deliberately create unsuitable compounds? Now about the MTR. The most optimal conditions for the work of any intelligence officer or commando is secrecy and autonomy. And that's why all the equipment for scouts to the maximum was made highly passable and floating, so that they could always go around guarded or destroyed bridges and sections of the terrain. And to carry along, let’s say MTU-20 on the basis of the T-55 tank is the top of idiocy !!!!
                      5. Alexey Prikazchikov
                        Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 12: 56 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        So they will be so unified 3 types of brigates, three types of wheeled platforms, and with the fact that the warriors do, I agree and about the reductions, we also can’t have an army too big, we’ll go bankrupt what happened to the USSR.
                      6. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 13: 39 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Yes, stop telling me about the collapse of the USSR, without you I guess why it fell apart. And the army is not the main reason for this collapse. Now we are talking about whether this armored car is needed in combat units or not. Here you said about unification and I ask you a question - who will be unified with what ????? How can the tracked infantry fighting vehicle and the Wolf or Tiger armored vehicles be unified? Yes, and armored personnel carriers plan to release on a completely different platform ...
              2. Foamas 1 November 2011 05: 03 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                For mythical light brigades VV, already planning to buy - This....
              3. Alexey Prikazchikov
                Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 05: 31 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Finish trolling judging by the ancient camouflage and the Merov machine gun, the fucked-up design and landscape, this is the Middle East.
              4. Foamas 1 November 2011 18: 47 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                I forgot to put a smiley belay (to the photo).
                An armored car from an exhibition in Jordan (because it’s also sandy camouflage, a machine gun can be replaced by anything the customer wants).
                The appearance of this device in the ranks of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is not as fantastic as it might seem initially, the fact is that the machine really liked (precisely by design) representatives of the Olympic Committee of the Russian Federation and they want to see her (in the amount of 50 pieces) to ensure the safety of facilities in Sochi.
      3. Dervish
        Dervish 6 November 2011 13: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Are you sure that we have such a reliable and large arsenal of nuclear weapons?
  • sweetheart
    sweetheart 1 November 2011 15: 35 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Dear, do you own the criteria for assessing the combat effectiveness of the riot police? OMON, let it be known to you, that since the beginning of the first Chechen riot police, it has not crawled out of business trips to the North Caucasus, fulfilling the functions there by no means of dispersing the "dissent" survivors from the mind by 31 numbers. Although this skill, of course, is necessary and is being developed. And the combat readiness of OMON fighters is several times greater than the combat readiness of ANY army unit of the current Armed Forces. I had the opportunity to observe the actions in real combat conditions of both the first, that is, the special units of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the second, that is, 18-20 year old boys, no matter what “contract soldiers” they were and in whatever “special forces” they were.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 1 November 2011 17: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Here it is not necessary for me to fill in the wavans of the fucker, only the Ponte are not able to fight, compared to us, the paratroopers, they are stupid suckers.
    2. erix-xnumx 2 November 2011 10: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Dear, I’m not going to polemicize with you about the OMON’s combat skills in the Chechen events, but according to the experience of the first war, my personal attitude to their skills is extremely negative. And if we return to the topic of discussion of this article, then in my message, speaking of a decrease in the combat effectiveness of the army to the level of OMON, I had in mind armament and assigned tasks to various units. Agree that it is impossible to force riot police to attack instead of an infantry battalion on an infantry fighting vehicle? And as regards conscripts in Chechnya, I’ll say the following: our sailors won back very well ... Neither in Grozny in the winter of 95, nor in the spring in the mountains were there any heroic riot police ... Cops were drawn in the city when our regiment moved on to the mountains...
  • Dervish
    Dervish 6 November 2011 13: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right man!
  • Mohomax 22 June 2013 20: 24 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I completely agree, but why EURO-4?
    1. ksan 30 August 2013 20: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      MOHOMAX RU June 22, 2013 20:24 PM ↑

      I completely agree, but why EURO-4?
      Sell ​​to Geyropa. It’s not tolerant to make the local piderasts breathe EURO-3 hi
  • roninas 15 November 2011 21: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Damn. It's still a delivery and support machine, rather, like the same Hammers. But not a full-fledged armored personnel carrier. The tasks are slightly different.
  • ksan 30 August 2013 20: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The good news is that this is a domestic product, from the engine to the body, it’s nice that this product can “push” its rival IVECO. It is not clear what the designers thought when they were working out the placement of the transported personnel in the passenger compartment, again the placement of their backs to the enemy, it was surprising that there was no loophole for shelling the front of the car and loopholes for the driver and the “senior car” to shoot to the side, is it possible to hatch in the roof of the control compartment use as protection against ammunition fired from a PC machine gun? Unfortunately, everything again seems to be repeating itself: those who develop and those who make decisions on providing these samples do not plan to “work” on these machines themselves.
    I agree the car compared with the "Tiger" seems "damp." Yes, and 7,62 with only 300 meters, too ????? The only thing pleases is that this is a domestic development and not Italian.
  • runway 31 October 2011 11: 14 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    In my opinion, the article is prepared technically competently and clearly. I especially liked the picture of the bottom of the car with hanging cables and pipes .... If everything is mostly "licked" from above, then there is a complete mess from below. It's time to think about the next modification of the machine ....
    1. ereke
      ereke 1 November 2011 01: 27 New
      • -5
      • 0
      -5
      piston.k,
      This is an advertising and exhibit sample)) On serial ones, if you go of course, you will ride on an additional reserve, instead of an anotomic seat like Iveco, but a spare tire made of rubber so that it will not go too hard to rub the fifth point, the main thing is that the seat belt is left just in case. Comfort is nothing, but cables and pipes are also nonsense, most importantly fighting qualities. For this, you can sacrifice the rest.
    2. Zlodeey April 16 2012 10: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      where is the mess there? where is that hanging out? trolls are bad, if only to blurt out something
  • Ion coaelung
    Ion coaelung 31 October 2011 13: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Awesome view of the wolf! Reliability also hope on the level!
  • rumpeljschtizhen 31 October 2011 13: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    and judging by the photo .. somehow everything
    piston.k rights
    Yes, and that the anti-mine protection does not inspire confidence, and where is the declared V-shaped bottom in general?
  • Krilion 31 October 2011 14: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    hands to tear to whoever made this car ... where the author saw a V-shaped bottom? .. what kind of fool placed another row of seats in the middle in the back? .. where to put additional equipment or wounded? .. already wrote about the neck of the tanks ...
    1. Vadivak 31 October 2011 21: 57 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Krilion
      .What fool placed another row of seats in the middle in the back ?.

      You look, they are easy to clean, (4 bolts) this is probably the police version
    2. Denis 2 December 2011 19: 18 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      [hid Pay attention to the location of the neck of the fuel tank, is that? Telling the enemy where to send an armor-piercing incendiary bullet? e] [/ hide]
      the author tried to burn a bucket of diesel fuel with matches?
  • Maksim
    Maksim 31 October 2011 17: 06 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Whatever Russia has, there would be life, equipment, technology and weapons, I will always love, respect, protect and Russia. t d
  • Victor 31 October 2011 22: 01 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    To judge strictly, of course, comments should also be made about shortcomings, but let's not forget that until recently, nothing was done and never was done. The main thing is that R&D earned, they began to put their designs to court. Try to compete and learn. In this regard, the entire car, “Menagerie,” is already a huge step forward. I think that healthy criticism and faith in the capabilities of our engineers will benefit the developers. And so, of course, the car is still quite crude and in the middle row I would refuse to sit. There is no chance of surviving a blast.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      Alexey Prikazchikov 31 October 2011 22: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Totally agree, this nagging has already lifted up.
  • ICT
    ICT 1 November 2011 00: 37 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Victor
    [And so, of course, the car is still quite damp and on the middle row I would refuse to sit. There is no chance of surviving a blast. [/ Quote]


    the middle row is generally superfluous, even without undermining and an ambush just interferes with the exit and the body (as in the stadium you need to write an instruction who goes for someone and then you need to train, I think)
  • Mr. Truth
    Mr. Truth 1 November 2011 01: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I feel that LBM platoons will appear as part of the airborne battalions, as at the time armored platoons of motorized rifles ..
    I am talking about three axle machines.
    1. kesa1111
      kesa1111 1 November 2011 04: 28 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I think both the 2 and 3 axles will come in handy for transporting equipment, food, signalmen, etc. But the army needs tracked and 4 axle axles.
  • rise
    rise 1 November 2011 06: 03 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I work a lot with all kinds of electric-mechanical tools, electronic there is no universal tool that they could do all the work qualitatively. So here is the Wolf for some purposes, armored personnel carriers for others, but it should be in the army if the soldiers in it are not cannon fodder
    1. erix-xnumx 1 November 2011 06: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Sound reasoning ... And then some figures are ready to shove these armored cars anywhere.
  • SIA
    SIA 1 November 2011 06: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The machine seems to have turned out nothing, but how many did not consider all the pictures, I did not find a v-shaped bottom. Maybe he is not there?
  • Volkhov
    Volkhov 1 November 2011 16: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    For some reason, the whole discussion left the point of creating armored trucks - when democracy flourished, it took a lot to ride tanks in the peaceful expanses of our homeland. The country is large, and the BT resource is small, it wears out quickly, it is inconvenient to steer in the city, and they decided to book road cars that are cheaper, more developed, economical and have a long resource.
    Armor in second place, it is more important to ride.
    So the WOLF is not suitable for either the police or the army, because the chassis is not serial, expensive, all breakdowns have to be fixed in operation, that is, it will not work much, it’s not a MAZ that can be repaired for years, but for war a trailer with glasses is needed, not to mention the rest.
    This is a technique for defeating a budget.
  • Krilion 2 November 2011 04: 16 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    the manufacturer should have thought about creating a civilian version of this car ... with a certain revision with a file, it could have been purchased for personal use ...
    1. limmor 22 November 2011 18: 43 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      a civilian option already exists called KOMBAT
  • potterz 2 November 2011 14: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    for me, a great car for specialists.
  • StrategBV 26 January 2012 10: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Ballistic protection class 6a, if I am not mistaken, it’s like the Tiger. But the “Tiger” loses just in terms of protection against mines and bullets. As the saying goes, either the ducks flew high, or the dog was thrown low. fellow
    1. Bad_gr 27 January 2012 13: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: StrategBV
      Ballistic protection class 6a, if I am not mistaken, it’s like the Tiger. But the “Tiger” loses just in terms of protection against mines and bullets. As the saying goes, either the ducks flew high, or the dog was thrown low.

      The "Tiger" that the MO ordered for the Army, and then refused to purchase, has a 3rd protection class, the police ordered the 5th for itself, received it and are happy with it.
      "Wolf" has the 6th class of protection. In addition to the V-shaped bottom, which everyone is constantly talking about, when a mine is blown up, the clearance of the car is also important, while the “Wolf”, if desired, can be installed at half a meter. For example, the experience of Afghanistan showed that if an unarmored Ural driver (detached from the frame) had a better chance of surviving an anti-tank mine, then the driver of an infantry fighting vehicle did.
      I liked the article with photos, but did not like the technical analysis of this machine at all. Guaranteed not even a tank is protected, and the protection of the machine should correspond to the tasks for which it was created. This was created, as I understand it, for patrolling or transferring personnel in a not calm area. In general, for police operations, for which army units are now involved. Whether it corresponds to this or not, those who will exploit it must say this.
  • Disasterpiece
    Disasterpiece 28 January 2013 21: 24 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    Eh ... Who created Merkavu? That's right, Israel Tal, a man who went to war, who knows what the tankers “live” in their tanks. I won’t dwell on the features of the building, only today, Merkava is one of the best tanks, ideally suited for a particular country, and one of the most “safe” (the crew does not die from a tank explosion). Why should I design combat vehicles should be engaged in people who were at war, or at least advise chtoli ...
    Tepericha about engines. Why do they have such a weak engine? (For wolves) On the roads of the Caucasus, a more powerful engine will be needed. Yes, damn it! (Checkmate is forbidden, alas). Even civilian sedans have more powerful engines! And I don’t even want to remember about “civilian” SUVs ... (Gelendvagen, LK Prado, Grand Cherokee, etc.)
    Definitely, the engine needs more power. I hope at least the diffs are blocked.
    1. During
      During 3 February 2013 02: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      immediately seen amateur no
      1. Disasterpiece
        Disasterpiece 7 February 2013 14: 45 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Okay, let it be your way. But still I would like to hear reasoned criticism.