The rout of Russia: not such a cold war ("Agora Vox", France)

13
The rout of Russia: not such a cold war ("Agora Vox", France)The Second World War taught us so much to the roar of explosions, rage and destruction, horrors and tens of millions of dead, that the cold war that followed it, with its backstage chess games and opposition from the American and Russian empires, seemed to us a long period of peace, despite the unambiguous name.

We perceived the collapse of the USSR as a natural collapse of the system that was at the last gasp.

However.

Nevertheless, let's take a closer look at the results of this cold war, not as an ideological end, which both sides wanted to foist us between the forces of “democratic capitalism” and “democratic centralism”, but more prosaically, as the end of confrontation between the strategic interests of Americans and Russians .

Just look at the map to lose your voice.

Let's look into the past. In the 15th century, when Ivan the Terrible came to power, the Grand Duchy of Moscow was only a secondary state surrounded on all sides: there was a huge Poland in the west, possessions of German orders in the north (Teutons, Sword-bearers), in the east - terrible Siberian tribes, in the south - warlike Tatars, who regularly made devastating raids to the very center of the principality.

More on the topic: uncomfortable for the West truth

Surprisingly, by the end of the reign of this lost mind of the tyrant, the Grand Duke became Tsar, the territory of the state expanded more than four times, the last Western knights were turned back, the Tatars were subjugated, and the endless Siberia was conquered.

From that moment, after the disastrous period of Godunov, the (last) invasion of the Poles and the assertion of the Romanov dynasty, each monarch with all his strength sought to expand the empire, strengthen it, establish alliances. And even the onset of the Bolshevik revolution in no way restrained (rather, quite the contrary) the scope of Russian imperialism.

For five centuries, the Russian destroyed and picked up what was left of the once great Polish kingdom. They advanced south to the borders of the Ottoman Empire, which had previously threatened Vienna a little earlier. They broke the backbone of the seemingly invincible Swedish forces, and then the Great Army of Napoleon. All this at the cost of simply unthinkable for any other nation of victims.

Stalin forced his people to starve, leaving him without grain to pay the French and English industrialists, he thereby formed the strongest metallurgy that allowed the Nazi military machine to be broken and his own conditions of victory to be imposed on his "allies."

Everyone knows the incredible scale of the territories under the control of the USSR in the 1950s, not counting the third world countries that fell one after another into its sphere of influence.

To realize that the Cold War was in fact a war that relied on the patient, persistent, tough and expensive arms and technology race, it’s enough just to compare the USSR 1990 map of the year with the Russia 1994 map of the year.

So, we can conclude that the Americans managed to tear away from the Russians the territory that was under German control in the winter of the 1941 of the year (Ukraine, Belarus, the Baltic States) and which the Russians were able to fight off at the cost of 20 millions of dead.

More on the topic: how e-mail helped destroy the USSR

In addition, the Americans were able to negate all the conquests of Peter the Great and (with the exception of Siberia) violate the integrity of the territories in the south and north, which belonged to Russia since the times of Ivan the Terrible (Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, huge Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan) .

Of course, such traitors of their homeland, like Yeltsin, made their task easier, but I bet that if the Americans did not have Yeltsin, they would have found someone else.

Five centuries of hard work, sacrifice and brilliant discoveries - all this was "quietly" destroyed in just a few months.

This is not just a victory, it is a triumph. This is not just a defeat, it is a rout.

Can you imagine what will happen if an external force cuts France from Alsace to Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Franche-Comté, Savoy, Haute-Savoie, the whole Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region leaves her? Béarn, the Basque lands, Roussillon, Corsica and Brittany?

It will not even defeat, but the dismemberment of the state. That is exactly what happened with Russia. Therefore, it simply doesn’t fit into my head that most people still continue to believe that its collapse occurred spontaneously.

What makes you think about our future.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    29 October 2011 13: 46
    nothing we all will return and take more and moreover !!!!!!
    1. zczczc
      +6
      29 October 2011 14: 36
      datur, without war, this is possible only in one case - if they have unrealistic shocks, and we have stable growth.
      1. +2
        30 October 2011 01: 59
        I do not agree, it is necessary not so much to press on the economy as on history and culture. The peoples that were part of the Empire felt comfortable in this Empire and were ready to die for it voluntarily. An example is the Wild Division of the 1 World War: Caucasians (former enemies) were exempted from military service, but they themselves raised a cry that they wanted to serve and fight for Russia. As a result, they created the Wild Division and it made such a rustle that the Germans still remember it. The same can be said of the Bashkirs during the 1812 war of the year and many others. First of all - we need cultural expansion - it is necessary through our TV, which is still shown in the former republics, to remind us of our common past, common victories and common sufferings, where the Russians had no easier way than everyone else.
    2. 0
      29 October 2011 21: 45
      All right datur, if we managed to take it once, we will be able to take it in the second.
  2. Insurgent
    +5
    29 October 2011 14: 38
    With politicians such as Medvedev, it’s as if
  3. Staff_
    0
    29 October 2011 16: 10
    Hmm, sad.
  4. rnb1983
    +4
    29 October 2011 19: 41
    Fuck them all !!!
  5. +1
    29 October 2011 21: 26
    With such as Medvedev and Putin, we are already losing. Several hundred square kilometers of islands on the Amur (Damansky, too, for which our border guards died in 1969), a huge piece of the Barents Sea. a small piece of Dagestan was presented to Azerbaijan. Like this . And if they still stand in power, then we will lose.
    1. prunx
      +1
      31 October 2011 10: 48
      A little normal to study the issue, and then whirl. Less for stupidity.
  6. +5
    30 October 2011 01: 42
    Wonderful article. If the French continue in the same vein, it is quite possible that they will become our allies in the world arena.
    One mistake that the West continues to repeat: Russia did not seize these territories, but mastered and annexed them. In other words, our progress from the Dnieper to the Pacific Ocean and the borders of Turkey is at 80% voluntary entry of all our peoples into one Empire and only at 20% capture. The huge difference between their colonialism (with the humiliation of the colonized peoples) and our development (with the full equality of Russians with all peoples, the preservation of cultures of all peoples and respect for local customs) If anyone wants to argue, then let me show at least one Delaware on the same map Republic or Mohican Autonomous Region with its own language and leadership from Mohicans or Delaware. Russia is a unique country, Russians are a people capable of uniting other nations around them, in no case assimilating them, but on the contrary, encouraging historical traditions and the development of their native language and culture in every possible way. There are no other such peoples. I am sure that everything will recover by itself, without any wars.
  7. wow
    +2
    30 October 2011 12: 02
    Nothing, nothing. Not yet experienced. History has a history of repeating itself. We always climbed out of shit in which any other nation would have long been drowned. Let’s get out this time, already wiser.
  8. -1
    30 October 2011 12: 42
    Mdaaa, competently we were talked about ... I agree with the author .... Well, never mind, we need to be caught up to Moscow, so that we can make change.
    “Russia is reproached for isolating itself and keeping silent in the face of such facts that do not harmonize with either law or justice. They say that Russia is angry. Russia is not angry, Russia is concentrating,” as A.M. Gorchakov
  9. prykordonyk
    -1
    13 November 2011 21: 53
    I was born in 1990. Why should I suffer from the mistakes of the older generation (collapse of the USSR)? Are all the people of the Oromnian country crazy at one point? Or maybe it was a global falsification?
    1. +1
      13 November 2011 22: 09
      Yes, just because everyone is fucked. And you, who did not have time to be born. So when you hear the words "freedom", "democracy" know --- they want to fuck you.
  10. Che
    Che
    +1
    2 December 2011 09: 04
    Great Tartaria included all of Asia, Europe and the Middle East. There was no difference between nations. The West is essentially destroying the motherland. I believe in the future of Russia, most likely, through great sacrifices, a bright time will come for all of humanity, and the anti-human regime of North American imperialism will disappear.