Military Review

Someone who Russified and destroyed the Holodomor

19


Recently, on our TV, various svidomye experts and political scientists, such as poor ignoramuses and provocateurs T. Voronova, V. Kovtun and O. Yakhno, tell tales in all respects that during the years of the Stalin famine the criminal communist regime deliberately destroyed the poor Ukrainians that was akin to the real genocide of the oldest nation in stories of mankind, who gave him a wheel, paper, gunpowder, founded Jerusalem and discovered America, etc. In order not to be unfounded, I will cite only three small facts, so that a respected reader will understand who Russified whom and who starved ...

1) After the February Revolution 1917, when the Central Rada headed by M. S. Hrushevsky, V. K. Vinnichenko and S. A. Petlyura, reigned in Kiev, the first stage of the forced Ukrainization of the entire Russian population of these territories immediately began in Little Russia and Novrossiya. . However, unexpectedly, the opportunity for the local Ukrainians to resurrect in the new guise of “Svidom Ukrainians” didn’t cause any excitement and euphoria to anyone except for a handful of yesterday’s rural intelligentsia.

Local villagers, at best, were completely indifferent to the nationalist slogans of the “Ukrainian svidomitov,” and they caused outright heartburn to the real Little Russian intelligentsia, especially when it suddenly turned out that the entire population of the UPR was to switch to the “Ukrainian language movement”, which no one could ever hear. here did not know and did not want to know. It is no coincidence that in their memoirs “Life ago” (1996), the young wife of the second Ukrainian prime minister, V. A. Golubovich, the daughter of a Russian general, Madame T. M. Cardinovskaya, whom her husband quickly re-educated in the spirit of “Ukrainian values”, wrote bitterly:

“I would like to add to the policy of Ukrainization of the times of the Central Rada that at that time in Kiev it caused many protests: some protested because of intolerance towards everything Ukrainian, others because of its violent plantings. The Russian Thought daily published the longest lists of people who signed up under the large heading “I protest against the forced Ukrainization of the South-Western Territory”.

Moreover, as the modern historian V. Marchukov, one of the brilliant experts on the “Ukrainian question,” established, the famous peasant movement N. I. Makhno was originally caused precisely by this violent Ukrainization and the fierce struggle of the Makhnovists not with white and red ones, armed detachments of Svidomo Petliurists, who became the mainstay of the Central Rada of Ukraine, and with the Germans, who occupied this part of Russia immediately after the conclusion between the UPR and the countries of the Fourth bloc of the “small” Brest peace in January 1918.

2) At the beginning of May, 1925 in the then capital of the Ukrainian SSR, Kharkov, hosted a plenary session of the Central Committee of the Communist Party (B) U, which adopted the notorious Decree “On Ukrainization”, containing a whole set of frankly nationalist demands that all party, state and economic bodies of the republic:

1) forcibly introduce the Ukrainian language, especially among the party and Soviet apparatus; 2) select and nominate party cadres from workers and labor peasants of Ukrainian nationality; 3) translate all party education into Ukrainian; 4) to translate into Ukrainian language teaching in all secondary and parts of higher educational institutions; 5) the Ukrainization of the party apparatus is carried out immediately, and the Soviet - no later than January 1926, etc.

The guides of this forced Ukrainization were the active supporters of the former head of the SNK of the Ukrainian SSR, the famous Trotskyist Kh. G. Rakovsky, who had the idea of ​​a total Ukrainization of everything and everything since the Civil War, when the primordial Russian lands of the Don Region and Five Novorossiysk provinces - Yekaterinoslav, Kharkov, Tauride, Kherson and Bessarabia. Now, on the eve of his resignation and departure by the Soviet plenipotentiary to London, he broke out with another Russophobic folio, Principal Tasks of the Moment (1923), with which he armed all the “Ukrainian independent supporters” with a real program of action.

Those stubborn "independentists" for the whole many thousands of KP (b) Y had just something 400 people. However, they - the former "Borotbists" - that is to say, Little Russian Raguli Social Revolutionaries - constituted the core of the entire party-state apparatus of the Ukrainian SSR, including A. Kvylya, Head of the Press Department of the Central Committee of the CP (b) U, and Chairman of the State Planning Committee of the Ukrainian SSR GF Grinko, People's Commissar of Justice and the Prosecutor of the Ukrainian SSR N. A. Skrypnik, People's Commissar of Finance of the Ukrainian SSR M. N. Poloz, People's Commissar of Education of the Ukrainian SSR A. Ya. Shchumsky, Chairman of the Kiev goris executive committee P. Lubchenko and others.

When the orgy of Ukrainization passed all reasonable limits, especially in the Donbas and in Krivoy Rog, where over half a year more than 60% of industrial workers and miners were threatened with dismissal were written down by Ukrainians in a flux, JV Stalin sent a letter to Tov. Kaganovich and other members of the Central Committee of the Communist Party (B) U, where in particular it was said:

“You cannot Ukrainize the proletariat from above. It is impossible to force the Russian working masses to abandon the Russian language and Russian culture and recognize their culture and their language as Ukrainian. This is contrary to the principle of free development of nationalities. It would not be national freedom, but a peculiar form of national oppression ... With the weakness of the indigenous communist cadres in Ukraine, this movement, led entirely by non-communist intelligentsia, can assume in places the nature of the struggle for the estrangement of Ukrainian culture and the Ukrainian public from the culture and society of the whole Soviet, the nature of the struggle against "Moscow" in general, against the Russians in general, against Russian culture ".

Nevertheless, the policy of “Ukrainization” was continued, albeit on a smaller scale, but finally this violent policy was finally put to an end only at the beginning of the 1930s.

3) On the territory of modern Ukraine, the topic of “famine” has already acquired not only an extremely painful, but also frankly Russophobic character. Most modern Ukrainian politicians, historians and political scientists like V. Yushchenko, S. Kulchitsky, G. Stadnik and G. Vyatrovich are still trying to prove in every way that the famine 1932 — 1933. was a pre-planned action organized by JV Stalin and his closest entourage for the purpose of the genocide of the Ukrainian people. However, these false, strictly politicized myths were fully exposed in the works of many Russian and Novorossiysk scholars and publicists, including articles and books by V.V. Kornilov, A. B. Martirosyan, G. S. Tkachenko, E. A. Prudnikova, and others.

In particular, as many historians and publicists have established - S.Nefedov, D.Penner, A.Mukhin, S.Kungurov and other mass deaths of people during the “famine”, especially in Ukraine, was the result of elementary lack of education and mentality of the villagers themselves, especially the Little Russian farms and villages that have become massively poisoned by infected grain. The fact is that according to experts (A.Sergeev), the 1932 harvest was generally very good and amounted to almost 70 mln. Tons. Moreover, if 1931, the export of grain abroad was about 5 million tons, in 1932 it amounted to slightly more than 1,7 million tons, and in 1933, and even less - 1,5 million tons.

However, a significant part of this crop, which was already collected not by individual farms, but by collective and state farms, was simply plundered by the curling peasants themselves, who, fearing to be prosecuted for grain theft, were criminally liable, including under the Law “On Three Spikelets”, bury it in self-made "grain pits." It was in such “early” earthen, not burnt clay, “storage facilities” that it quickly became infected with deadly-toxic micro-fungi, which caused the alimentary-toxic aleukya in consumers of this grain, which was then called “septic angina”.

When the epidemic of this disease became catastrophic, then, at the direction of the authorities, the NKVD organs were rushed to fight the “grain pits”, which mercilessly burned them to stop the scale of this epidemic and the massive death of people, especially in Ukraine. In addition, under the conditions of the so-called “Italian strike”, when the newly-minted collective farmers simply did not want to harvest the ripened crop from the “alien” collective farm fields, massive over-ripening grain loaves occurred, resulting in about 20 – 25% of the entire crop left on the fields and was destroyed during the so-called "mouse scourge", when the voracious rodents destroyed all the grain left in the fields with straw.

Someone who Russified and destroyed the Holodomor
Author:
Originator:
http://nacontrol.ru/istoriya/kto-kogo-rusifitsiroval-i-grobil-golodomorom/
19 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aleksander
    Aleksander 1 August 2015 06: 38
    +9
    The creation of national republics and the subsequent forcible Ukrainization of the Russian population is the real crime of the Bolsheviks, which even today leads to the deaths of thousands and thousands of people in the Donbass.
    1. captain
      captain 1 August 2015 09: 09
      +23
      Aleksander agree with you, but not completely. Not only in the Donbass, thousands of people died, but also in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, in our North Caucasus, while the Terek Cossacks were practically destroyed. The top of the CPSU (b) at that time was completely Russophobic. Lenin in his work "On the question of nationalities or" autonomization "" called for solving all territorial issues at the expense of the Russians. I recommend all admirers of Ilyich to read the work carefully. Our leader called the Russians "Derzhimords", read the work "On the national pride of the Great Russians". By the way, Stalin and Dzerzhinsky were against autonomization in the Leninist way. I think that the Russian people will still have grief over the Leninist ethnic policy. Especially those Russians who have not yet left the republics of Central Asia. As soon as Nazarbayev and Karimov change (let them live forever), there will be a showdown with the Russians. No one in Russia believed that Russians would be burned in Ukraine. I remember they called me different literary and not very words about the massacre of Russians, but what I wrote about happened.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Aleksander
        Aleksander 1 August 2015 10: 19
        +9
        Quote: captain
        I agree with you Aleksander, but not completely. Thousands of people died not only in the Donbass, but also in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, and in the North Caucasus. And the Terek Cossacks were practically destroyed

        I agree completely, it's just that the article was talking about Ukraine, and I mentioned it. The fate of the Terek Cossack army, in my opinion, is the most terrible of all the Cossack troops - on one day, March 27, 1920, the "Red Highlanders" massacred 37 thousand unarmed members of Cossack families who were forcibly resettled beyond the Terek - this is an indescribable atrocity in relation to their own people.
      3. Lelek
        Lelek 1 August 2015 10: 38
        +3
        Quote: captain
        captain


        hi You are absolutely right. Nothing to add.
    2. Dimka off
      Dimka off 2 August 2015 16: 20
      +1
      Quote: Aleksander
      to the deaths of thousands and thousands of people in the Donbass

      a terrible fact but not in the first place in terms of horror. At the first - the fragmentation of a single people into pieces, changes in thinking itself, in history. Well, with all that it implies. Although, in fairness, I must say that not only did the wiki Ukrainize the Russian people more - there are many participants
  2. GRAY
    GRAY 1 August 2015 07: 01
    +2
    Read from lost_kritik's Gap Template.
    http://lost-kritik.livejournal.com/38856.html

    This document is a godsend. Damn happy with myself.

    Copy of resolution of Comrade Molotov to Comrade Vyshinsky

    Check the statement T.Kormilo apparently he is right and he should be released 26 / II (Molotov) (By hand)

    CHAIRMAN OF THE SNK-USSR MOLOTOV

    From the former chairman of the village council of the village of Peschanki,

    Novo-Moskovsky district of the Dnepropetrovsk region of the Ukrainian SSR,

    KORMILO Ilya Semenovich

    Statement

    I ask you to parse my application and apply to the All-Russian Central Executive Committee for my pardon, since I am serving my sentence in vain. My case is condemned as follows:

    In 1931, I, as the best chairman of the s / council, was transferred to s. Gerbils, in this village there were 5 collective farms, but one of them was kulak, i.e. consisted of fists. Never fully harvested and meat procured did not give up. When you arrived in this village, and I personally reported this to you, then you collected the bureau RIK at which it was decided to dissolve the entire party organization and search out of the party, with the exception of me and yours were the words that I am a good worker, but illiterate and that I need to be trained. In relation to this collective farm “5 in 4 years”, it will also be reorganized, and former collective farmers should be made sole sovereigns and taxed as sole sovereigns. Which was done by me. When these former collective farmers did not want to completely surrender their grain and pay taxes, I did searches with an asset and found 108 pieces of pits in which there was bread and which rotted. For this, I put them on trial, which caused these people to become embittered. In general, the plan was overfulfilled, and I sent you a telegram about this, to which you answered me through the newspaper Pravda.

    After 3, 4 months, these people (that is, former collective farmers) again joined the collective farm and at the same time filed a petition to the people's court that they were allegedly collective farmers, and I taxed them as one-man employees. I did not know about this until 1934, i.e. until the investigator called me. I began to prove to the investigator that I was right, but he demanded documents from me. I applied to the RIC for a copy of the resolution regarding the reorganization of this collective farm, but they did not give it to me and because of this I was not able to show my case. I was convicted under Art. and 97 for 99 years in prison

    I appeal to you because you know about this case and ask for your petition to the All-Russian Central Executive Committee for my pardon, and I know that you will not allow an innocent person and a devotee of the party and government to serve a sentence in vain, which he does not deserve at all .

    In this case I turned to the pre-executive committee of Comrade Gavrilov and he assured me that I would not be anything and I calmed down on this.

    I earnestly ask you, Comrade Molotov, not to refuse my request and to release me from custody, but to bring those responsible for my detention to justice.

    I personally came with you to the PKK Bureau in a car and you can recall this incident, which plays a big role in my life.

    Petitioner I. Cormilo

    1. GRAY
      GRAY 1 August 2015 07: 02
      0
      Biography

      Born in 1921 (as in the test), served in the Red Army for 2 years and was discharged in 1924. From 1925 to 1927 he served as a pom. The beginning the police. In 1927, they elected me before. K.N.S. where I have been a member since 1924. In 1928, the KNS organization sent me to the post of chairman of the council in the village of Znamenovka, Novo-Moskovsky district. At this time, there was a merger of two regions, Novomoskovsky and Pereshchepinsky. In 1931 me as the best before. s / council of the PKK and RIC were transferred to the most lagging village of Peschanka, Novomoskovsk district, which you personally visited in January 1932 in 1 and because of which I fell into such a bad situation. In the course of his work, the chairman. s / council I was awarded for good work 15-20 times.

      I ask you, Comrade Molotov, to recall your visit to the village of Peschanka, I have faithfully executed your order and decree of the RIC and the PKK, and because of which I am due to the official relationship The court I received such a punishment is not deserved. Removed from work 15.VII. 1934 year. At the present time I am in the camps and work as a teacher admin. those. staff 12 squad.

      5.VIII.1935 year Helm

      My address is:

      Moscow, 101, Pokrovskoye-Glebovo, Dmit. Camp NKVD.

      Southern district, 30th Schukinsky site, Ilya Semenovich Kormilo.

      Right. Signature.

      ----------------

      26 September 1935 of

      No. 9-12114

      CHAIR OF SNK UNION SSR

      that. MOLOTOV

      IN Fulfillment of your order from this date on checking the correctness of conviction gr. I FILED Ilya Semenovich I claimed his case and ordered the suspension of the court verdict with the release of FOOD from custody.

      I’ll inform you about the results of the verification of the case.

      AND ABOUT. Prosecutor of the Union of the SSR (G. ROGINSKY)

      --------------------

      25th of January 1936

      CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNCIL OF PEOPLE'S COMMISSARS OF THE USSR

      comrade MOLOTOV V.M.

      In addition to the letter of September 26, 1935 No. 9-12114 in the case of gr. FEED I.S. I inform you that the case has been criminally dismissed and LEFT released from custody on September 30, 1935.

      Prosecutor of the USSR (A. Vyshinsky)

      -------------

      GARF R-5446.82.45 L.298-301

      --------------

      So.

      1. Of the five collective farms, one turned out to be kulak.

      2. The collective farm would be dispersed after the arrival of Molotov. Oh how!

      3. Former fists themselves entered the collective farm, even after once they were kicked out of it. Only the bloody Chekists drove.

      4. Individuals did not hand over bread to the state and hid it in the pits where it disappeared. After the arrears were knocked out of them, the application was filed in court.

      5. The court sided with the former kulaks, and condemned the chairman of the village council.
  3. bzbo
    bzbo 1 August 2015 09: 10
    +5
    Starved just Novorossia. The largest number of deaths was in the southeastern industrial regions with large regional centers - Kharkov, Odessa, and only then the Kiev region. It was in favor of the urban population that food was seized. But if you evaluate the affected villages, then more displaced migrants arrived since the 18th century.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 1 August 2015 10: 15
      +2
      And what has changed? Whatever trouble they themselves have done, Russia is to blame for everything.
  4. Nikolay K
    Nikolay K 1 August 2015 09: 45
    +2
    From the author’s point of view, the peasants themselves starved themselves and poisoned themselves with infected grain from grain pits. Well, a conclusion in the spirit of the current Ukrainian press, they tell how in Donetsk they once again fired upon themselves. . .
    And it didn’t occur to you that the peasants hid the bread in pits not from a good life, not from greed, but because they had nothing to eat, because they had to feed the children, and they took the grown bread from them, sometimes partly? And this was not only in Ukraine, but everywhere where a leader came across who wanted to fulfill and overfulfill the party’s task. The Soviet government wanted to collect grain and send it for export, but as a result it turned out that part of the crop rotted in the fields, part was poisoned in the pits. And instead of export, we got hunger, cannibalism and hundreds of thousands of people who died of hunger. The peasant then had a choice either to give all the grain and die the whole family from starvation, or to hide the grain and be shot for it under the law of three spikelets. So it turns out that the peasant himself is to blame for his death, and not the one who put him before such a choice.
    1. GRAY
      GRAY 1 August 2015 10: 05
      0
      Quote: Nikolai K
      not from greed, but because they had nothing to eat

      If the bread in the pits rotted, then this already indicates that it is hidden more than they can eat.
      If they had surrendered rather than rotted, then no one would shake them and they would not tighten their nuts.
      Neither to myself nor to people. If this is not greed, then what?
      1. Nikolay K
        Nikolay K 1 August 2015 11: 25
        +5
        Okay, dark peasants, but you must understand in the 21 century and with higher education that it is IMPOSSIBLE to store bread in earthen pits. And he had to be stored there until the next harvest, because there was nowhere to take more bread. Because the bread did not rot because the peasants hid it more than they could eat, but because they hid the grain from hopelessness.
  5. parusnik
    parusnik 1 August 2015 10: 21
    +3
    Not much off topic, but almost how the bread in the pits rotted .. Touch on today's time .. The well-known persimmon fruit ... for example .. How the season ... is very expensive .. in the middle of the season the price drops, towards the end again rises .. I ask the seller, sorting out the overripe fruits, but why don’t you lower the price .. would you sort it out faster, do you still have 100 percent wrap? .. And .. I still took mine .. and feed the rest to the pigs .. painfully fat turns out .. I do not think that the mentality 90 years ago was different ..
    1. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 1 August 2015 11: 37
      +4
      Do not compare the merchant and the one who raised the bread. The Soviet government promised to give the peasant land. For this very land, peasants lived blood in a civil war, forming the basis of the red army. And so, when the peasant on his land, watering it with sweat and blood, grew bread to feed himself and his children, they came to him with a rifle and demanded to give the grain as much as they considered necessary. And do not care that people will die of starvation, the main thing is to fulfill the plan for collecting grain, to send it for export and to fulfill the industrialization program at the same time. Put yourself in the place of those peasants. You would probably meekly give all the bread clean and put the children to die. Of course, the mentality of 90 years ago was different
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 1 August 2015 16: 42
        0
        Beautifully written. A tart. A simple example. During the First World War, the German government set the purchase price for bread for peasants, and they meekly sold at a fixed price and the German army did not starve. The Russian army already in 1916 felt the lack of food, more about that A.I. Denikin writes .. and in 1916 the tsarist government was forced to form food detachments to seize surplus bread .. The Provisional Government continued this policy .. and the Soviet .. And then, famine arose in the black soil regions of Ukraine, the Don, Kuban ... after the mass slaughter of draft cattle, bulls, oxen plowed on them .. the acreage fell sharply .. Who gave the command to cut, why they still cut this issue is hushed up .. Grandma said that my great-grandfather was threatened with reprisal, because he didn’t cut his cattle, like they cut everything, but he didn’t .. His great-grandfather was, of course, strange, according to his fellow villagers, he sowed, harvested grain when he considered it necessary and was always with the crop .. unlike the others .. And he experienced hunger and..
      2. Critic
        Critic 1 August 2015 17: 52
        0
        You would have looked at the size of the plan and export for decency)))
  6. Critic
    Critic 1 August 2015 17: 26
    0
    Quote: bzbo
    Starved just Novorossia. The largest number of deaths was in the southeastern industrial regions with large regional centers - Kharkov, Odessa, and only then the Kiev region. It was in favor of the urban population that food was seized. But if you evaluate the affected villages, then more displaced migrants arrived since the 18th century.

    Exactly the opposite.
    In the village, who died per 1000 in 1933
    Kiev 96,3
    Kharkiv 87,5
    Moldavian ASSR 61,9
    Vinnytsia 59,9
    Dnipropetrovsk 52,5
    Odessa 52,2
    Chernihiv 41,6
    Donetsk 38,9
    Lugansk region. was then part of Donetsk. Moreover, in the Donetsk region, the urban population exceeded the rural population.
    Categories of victims. Sole proprietors, having many children, beckless, having worked out few workdays
  7. vasyukov
    vasyukov 1 August 2015 20: 06
    +3
    How about the Holodomor in Kazakhstan? And the term "starving Volga region" has already been forgotten? How so? It seems that the Volga region is NOT black earth, unlike Ukraine?
    1. Vladislav 73
      Vladislav 73 2 August 2015 16: 37
      0
      I completely agree with you! Is it possible that except in Ukraine there was no famine anywhere? This tired Krainskaya song is tired! negative Precisely that the Volga region, if I am not mistaken, suffered the greatest loss of life ... And the riots in Voronezh ... Marshal Tukhachevsky, beloved by the liberals, where he pacified the hunger riots, I think, in the Tambov region? Enough to justify yourself for any liberal or 404 nonsense! negative Write about Russia already !!! request
  8. marlin1203
    marlin1203 2 August 2015 01: 20
    0
    The violent "nazification" of the population in our time is some kind of Middle Ages. On the other hand ... the Khliphat is coming, the order is quite ancient and the world community is nothing to put up with it. So, apparently, everything is a matter of the benefit of the powerful.
  9. iouris
    iouris 2 August 2015 01: 25
    +1
    Enough about the Holodomor in a separate "Ukraine", which is 80% - New Russia. This is a propaganda ploy.
    Collectivization and seizure of products were carried out in order to encourage peasants to abandon land and leave for the city, to join in industrialization. Industrialization was carried out at an accelerated pace, since the war was planned, everyone knew about it and talked about it in speeches at congresses of the CPSU (b). In addition, the country was not controlled by Russians, but mainly non-Russians. The RSFSR did not have an academy of sciences or even its own party organization.
  10. Igor K
    Igor K 2 August 2015 04: 34
    +1
    Most of the AUCPB came to Russia to make a revolution, and I think they had a plan for the collapse of Russia. Today, this plan is already working at a new level.