Military Review

Australian Foreign Ministry intends to achieve a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal

40
The head of the Australian Foreign Ministry Julie Bishop intends to seek "unanimous approval" by the UN Security Council of the resolution on the establishment of an international tribunal for the Malaysian Boeing, which crashed in Ukraine, reports TASS with reference to the Sydney Morning Herald.

Australian Foreign Ministry intends to achieve a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal


“We cannot allow a veto to be imposed on this resolution, justice should triumph. We have an obligation to the families of the victims to lead the persecution of those responsible for this act. ”- said Bishop.

“I will call for the unanimous approval of the resolution,” she added.

Responding to a question about the position on this issue of Russia, Bishop said: "If we are talking about concerns about this issue, then I expect Russia (in voting on the resolution in the UN Security Council) to abstain."

Meanwhile, the representative of the Russian Federation at the UN, Vitaly Churkin, said yesterday that the Russian delegation would vote against the resolution.

He told reporters:
“We will vote against it, I have no doubts about that. If the resolution gets nine or more votes, it will be a veto. If it gets less than nine votes, then it will simply be a negative vote of Russia along with some other members of the Security Council. Unfortunately, I think that nine votes are likely to be typed. ”


At the same time, the diplomat expressed hope that the draft submitted by Malaysia would not be put to a vote. “I have such hope, because I don’t see at all what and how it will benefit from it. It seems to me that our arguments, and we openly present them, are extremely convincing. ”

Earlier, the initiative to create an international tribunal was made by Malaysia, the Netherlands, Australia (most of the dead on board the ship were citizens of these countries), Belgium and Ukraine.
Photos used:
TASS
40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vend
    Vend 28 July 2015 11: 11
    +10
    Australopithecus still want to achieve something laughing ?
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 28 July 2015 11: 17
      +7
      US intelligence veterans asked US President Barack Obama to publicly disclose all information received by the country's intelligence services regarding the crash of a Malaysian airliner in the Donbass.
      In their address to the head of state, US intelligence veterans, including the NSA, demanded the release of real data instead of vague and far-fetched evidence of what caused the Boeing MH-17 disaster. In addition, they expressed outrage that the White House in its statement is guided by data obtained from social networks.

      They call this situation "an insult to the integrity and professionalism of the intelligence community."
    2. Varyag_1973
      Varyag_1973 28 July 2015 11: 17
      +4
      For Wend. There are not "Australopithecines", what they want there, but their brazen Saka masters!
    3. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 28 July 2015 11: 33
      +1
      That Canada, that Australia with foam at the mouth of the steam engine, all sorts of .... .... they are worried about it, the bolt is rusty in the wall.
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 28 July 2015 13: 32
        +3
        Quote: Stalker.1977
        What is Canada, what is Australia with foam at the mouth of the steam engine, any x .... they are worried about it, the bolt is rusty in it



        Do not forget that Canada, that Australia are geeks of mother Naglia (Canada - partially) ...

        And this Naglia sits quietly, it seems to have nothing to do with it ...
    4. GELEZNII_KAPUT
      GELEZNII_KAPUT 28 July 2015 11: 40
      +2
      Quote: Wend
      Australopithecus still want to achieve something?

      Dead end branch, however! bully
    5. K-50
      K-50 28 July 2015 12: 10
      +5
      Quote: Wend
      Australopithecus still want to achieve something laughing ?

      Well, they are relatives with "wide dill", so they want to whitewash the bros.
      Only it seems to me that the opposite will work out. After all, if a normal trial begins, then it will come out as secretly noted in this case.
    6. veksha50
      veksha50 28 July 2015 13: 31
      0
      Quote: Wend
      Australopithecus still want to achieve something



      Similarly, as not only militiamen, but also Russia are trying to blame for the downing of a Boeing, the Australians can be blamelessly blamed as well, saying that it was their DRG, which consisted of Aboriginal pygmies, that hit a Boeing with a boomerang ...

      To answer delirium with delirium ... The force of action is equal to the force of reaction ...

      PS And the boomerang will be back soon ... let them wait a bit ...
    7. Very smart
      Very smart 28 July 2015 15: 24
      -1
      Quote: Wend
      Australopithecus still want to achieve something

      Local history notes: There is such a mushroom in the forests of our Motherland. "Otzosinovik" is called. Apparently, it does not grow in Australopithecus. We'll have to meet and taste. To this end, the minestress of Australopithekia went to New Yorick. Testing will take place at the UN. Everyone is welcome. The noble local historian and mushroom breeder Mr. Churkin is on the Russian side of the party. For him, this is not the first promotion followed by a tasting. And not the last ...
      1. Scraptor
        Scraptor 28 July 2015 18: 47
        0
        Maybe she needs it? Especially if she is doing well with her teeth?

        It is Mr. Churkin at the UN who knows what he is doing, always affectionately excusing himself and making comments instead of asking his questions harshly.
  2. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 28 July 2015 11: 11
    0
    Australian Foreign Ministry intends
    Australia? No, I do not know.
    1. Tanais
      Tanais 28 July 2015 11: 29
      +2
      Australian Foreign Ministry intends to achieve a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal


      Why aren’t they wrinkling, Australians? what

      Seems to understand yes ... they are looking forward to arriving on mainland Australia, a fresh batch of exiled convicts ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. sever.56
    sever.56 28 July 2015 11: 12
    +3
    Download further - kangaroo-spoilers! Russia will block this politically-biased proposal!
  5. Penetrator
    Penetrator 28 July 2015 11: 14
    +14
    We cannot allow this resolution to be vetoed

    But the fact that? In Sportloto write or combat kangaroos set? Funny, by golly - some mongrel is trying to challenge the veto of the founding state of the UN. By the way, did you see her face?
    1. 70BSN
      70BSN 28 July 2015 12: 07
      +3
      Yes, they are all there with such HORNS laughing
    2. K-50
      K-50 28 July 2015 12: 12
      +1
      Quote: Penetrator
      By the way, did you see her face?

      Pushing? laughing
    3. Pafos
      Pafos 28 July 2015 12: 53
      0
      Krasava had fun laughing
  6. Varyag_1973
    Varyag_1973 28 July 2015 11: 15
    +13
    In this case, Russia should initiate an international tribunal for:
    1. The downed Iranian destroyer in 1988!
    2. Tu-154 aircraft shot down by Ukraine over the Black Sea in 2001!

    They don’t even have to prove guilty there!
    1. AlexSK
      AlexSK 28 July 2015 11: 20
      +1
      I also recalled these cases only today. What lyada do not have a tribunal on them? Or as usual double standards. "What is permitted to Jupiter is not permitted to the bull."
    2. Dan4eG
      Dan4eG 28 July 2015 11: 28
      -3
      as well as downed flight 007!
      1. Varyag_1973
        Varyag_1973 28 July 2015 11: 35
        +2
        For Dan4eG. Don’t confuse a reconnaissance plane with a passenger one! Yes, the USSR did not deny the fact of the destruction of the aircraft!
        And this plane was shot down over the territory of the USSR, and far enough from the border!

        "The flight to Seoul was supposed to pass over the neutral waters of the Pacific Ocean, when the plane, for an unknown reason, began to deviate to the right of the designated course. After some time, it deviated so much to the west that it entered the closed airspace of the USSR, after which it flew over Kamchatka, passing a number military facilities, and then over the island of Sakhalin.Above the latter, he was intercepted and then shot down by a Soviet Su-15 fighter, after which it crashed into the water in the La Perouse Strait south-west of Sakhalin, killing all 269 people on board , including a member of the US House of Representatives Larry McDonald [en] (eng. Larry McDonald), who was going to run for president of the United States. "
        1. Dan4eG
          Dan4eG 28 July 2015 12: 10
          0
          and which of them is intelligence? Carcass or Boeing?
    3. Penetrator
      Penetrator 28 July 2015 11: 30
      +1
      By the way, 1988, a Boeing explosion over Lockerbie. Found guilty of Libya. But actually, who? Gaddafi reset, no one to ask, even at the same international tribunal.
      Or, a confirmed fact is that the US Air Force shot down the Soviet Il-12 over the territory of the PRC exactly 62 years ago. There is even a killer pilot known. Yes, there are a lot of reasons ..
    4. Belarus
      Belarus 28 July 2015 11: 57
      +2
      In this case, Russia should initiate an international tribunal for:
      1. The downed Iranian destroyer in 1988!
      2. Tu-154 aircraft shot down by Ukraine over the Black Sea in 2001!


      You forgot to add the Soviet passenger aircraft Il-27, shot down on July 1953, 12 by the Americans.
    5. Scraptor
      Scraptor 28 July 2015 12: 44
      +2
      Was there a tribunal for a plane shot down in Zambia by the 2nd UN Secretary General (the survivors were shot down on the ground, including him) in 1961?
      Let them figure it out first.
      And also how the Serbian bosses in their tribunal died two in a week, when they could not be condemned.
  7. Sergey Sitnikov
    Sergey Sitnikov 28 July 2015 11: 15
    +1
    Australia? Which side? Who are you AT ALL?
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 28 July 2015 13: 37
      0
      Quote: Sergey Sitnikov
      Australia? Which side? Who are you AT ALL?


      Kangaroo and lovebird suppliers
  8. Russian Uzbek
    Russian Uzbek 28 July 2015 11: 15
    0
    “If we are talking about concerns precisely about this, then I expect that Russia (when voting on a resolution in the UN Security Council) will abstain”
    well, yes, well, yes ... or even better to write "sincere";)
  9. Same lech
    Same lech 28 July 2015 11: 15
    0
    Australian Foreign Ministry intends to achieve a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal



    In this way, the Anglo-Saxons create the necessary information background in the media to help them push the necessary decisions to the UN.

    Many states peck at this bait and are on the side of liars and scammers in WASHINGTON.

    Wow ... there was no evidence of the guilt of the suspects and the tribunal already wants to run to the fullest.
    A well-known reception and our Foreign Ministry should come up with a more effective answer
  10. andrei332809
    andrei332809 28 July 2015 11: 16
    0
    new gigemons? and the emperor of the universe received the good? well, Klimkin?
  11. Izotovp
    Izotovp 28 July 2015 11: 17
    +2
    No wonder. They are part of England with all the ensuing political ambitions.
  12. FIREMAN
    FIREMAN 28 July 2015 11: 20
    +4
    justice must triumph

    Justice - the concept of due, containing the requirement of conformity of action and retribution.
    1. What criteria can be used to assess such compliance?
    2. And who are the judges?
    3. It may be better to announce all the information and come closer to objective realityrather than engage in the appointment of perpetrators based on pseudoscientific accultism incomprehensible "experts" attracted by the interested parties, who have no idea about the properties of the ammunition that could have brought down this aircraft and even after a year did not give a sane answer about the reasons.
    4. Let me correct, but in any case if the plane crashed into the ruins, then the ruin (as a subject of international law) or Svidomo junta should answer.
    He doesn’t want to answer, let him provide evidence of his innocence, in my opinion this is absolutely correct within the framework of established legal representations.
    5. Churkin is 100% right - there is no need to turn tragedy into a farce, let alone use this mournful case in the realization of his base goals.
  13. Edmon dantes
    Edmon dantes 28 July 2015 11: 23
    +1
    The mongrels, one by one, on distillation, try to crawl America both far and wide.
  14. little girl15
    little girl15 28 July 2015 11: 23
    +1
    What are you talking about a superpower? And if they send us an army?
    1. veksha50
      veksha50 28 July 2015 13: 39
      0
      Quote: Vovochka15
      What are you talking about a superpower? And if they send us an army?



      In addition to the kangaroo, they have a predominance of rabbits ... There, one was sent to Ukraine - and how many troubles he did ...
  15. Zingvar
    Zingvar 28 July 2015 11: 42
    0
    He can demand as much as he wants, he only has to humbly ask. The battle hamster pissed, can be crushed by a vigorous loaf and forget. Australia is where and who?
  16. Anita
    Anita 28 July 2015 11: 42
    +3
    Churkin, as always, is right. In parallel, set a precedent and condemn Savchenko to life (she is not a woman), based on the fact that we consider her guilty. In my opinion, this will be fair and, as is now customary to say, symmetrically.
  17. Belarus
    Belarus 28 July 2015 12: 00
    +3
    The appearance of the head of the Australian Foreign Ministry as if she gave birth to a kangaroo and accordingly thinks the same way.
    Australia is a colony of Great Britain and talking about its pseudo-independence is like talking about the independence of usrains.
  18. Tor5
    Tor5 28 July 2015 12: 05
    0
    I wonder how they will achieve? Will veto veto?
  19. Tusv
    Tusv 28 July 2015 12: 08
    0
    What is the use of this tribunal? The veto right in this case saves the western crap
  20. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 28 July 2015 12: 13
    +1
    Descendants of Australian convicts climbed out? If every Pacific island will bleat something ...
    They have a smaller population than in the Moscow and St. Petersburg regions combined, but still there ...

    The villains, even if they were lobbying for their interests, would choose more decently that the Balts, the unfinished Slavs-Psheks, the Papuans ... In short, no look, no wool - there is no vulgarity.
  21. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 28 July 2015 12: 13
    0
    This topic has already been discussed below, so I do not want to repeat it.
  22. mamont5
    mamont5 28 July 2015 12: 30
    0
    Quote: Wend
    Australopithecus still want to achieve something laughing ?

    Well, one blood with the Anglo-Saxons. The kennels got out of the same, and here they are yapping in unison.
  23. sieras
    sieras 28 July 2015 12: 38
    +1
    that is, the Australian Foreign Ministry previously stated that of the two videos unknown to anyone posted on YouTube, it is clear that Russia is to blame. and after that they hope to push through a resolution?
    this is the same thing as someone you can't catch up with and you say, don't "come on good", but "come and I'll give you in the face." Well, the logic of these idiots.
  24. Tusv
    Tusv 28 July 2015 12: 42
    0
    Where is my slipper to knock responsibly from the UN rostrum!
    I demand to admit that Russia is a part of the world, and Australia is not a continent - it is a splinter from Antarctica am
  25. lazma3
    lazma3 28 July 2015 12: 56
    +1
    Australia wants to show that it is a great power. And has it grown to this status?
  26. veksha50
    veksha50 28 July 2015 13: 26
    +1
    "The Australian Foreign Office intends to achieve the adoption of a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal" ...

    Well, who, if not Australia, should be concerned about the question of who shot down this cursed Malaysian Boeing ...

    PS I am sure that they know the culprit absolutely, without any investigation ...
  27. provincial
    provincial 28 July 2015 14: 14
    +1
    Again, the stink from the ass. These Australians live somewhere in the backyards, but I want to be noticed.
  28. afrikanez
    afrikanez 28 July 2015 14: 27
    +1
    Australian Foreign Ministry intends to achieve a resolution on the Boeing Tribunal
    Well, it’s completely not clear. what do these achieve. It seems that they really want to scare Russia. Yes, nothing will come of you. There is neither evidence, nor a decision of the commission to investigate the crash, but even if it does, all the same, knowledgeable people understand perfectly who shot down and why!
  29. moody fin
    moody fin 28 July 2015 14: 28
    0
    Hello everyone .... I'm not special on airplanes, etc. .... but just compare the photos of the corpses after the crash of the Boeing (like Anna TV) with any other accidents ... the question arises where is the blood .... there is no track from the missiles- these are two ... complete secrecy in negotiations and telemetry is three .... and another failure in the information vacuum the disappearance of the same Boeing only in March ...
  30. fzr1000
    fzr1000 28 July 2015 17: 04
    0
    Australian Foreign Ministry intends to seek unanimous recognition in the UN Security Council ....
    Do they hear themselves? So funny. Let them better prepare for financial w ... e, otherwise they have made debts, of course, not so much as their Owner, well, the possibilities are not comparable.
  31. Knight Rider
    Knight Rider 28 July 2015 18: 57
    +2
    They wanted a tribunal. Do they need an objective open investigation? But the guilty ones have already been appointed. Hypocrites.
  32. jaroff
    jaroff 28 July 2015 19: 25
    +1
    I think that the veto of Russia is inevitable. One must be realistic.
  33. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 28 July 2015 19: 47
    +1
    the tribunal is not legally subordinate to anyone, so they can declare anyone guilty of the tragedy and show nothing to anyone.
    1. Scraptor
      Scraptor 28 July 2015 20: 23
      0
      Yes, indeed, why not just at the ECHR? Moreover, Ukraine is tse Europe, and the Chicago court has nothing to do with it either.
  34. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 29 July 2015 03: 32
    0
    The tribunal is another show under the wing of Tan !!!!