Approved updated Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation

34
July 26, Naval Day fleet, it was announced the approval of an updated version of the Marine Doctrine of the Russian Federation. Given the events of recent years and changes in the world situation, the military and political leadership of Russia decided on the need to finalize a document defining national maritime policy. Further development of the navy and related areas should go in accordance with the provisions of the updated doctrine.

The appearance of the updated version of the Maritime Doctrine was announced at a meeting held in the town of Baltiysk (Kaliningrad Region) on board the frigate “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov”. The meeting was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, Commander in Chief of the Navy Admiral Viktor Chirkov and Commander of the Western Military District Colonel-General Anatoly Sidorov.

During the meeting, some innovations of the updated Maritime Doctrine were announced. For various reasons, it was decided to finalize and change some sections of the document, as well as add new ones that were not previously available. The result of this was the emergence of a renewed Doctrine, which, according to V. Putin, was not only compiled, but also approved. Thus, even now the development of the Russian Navy should be carried out taking into account the updated Maritime Doctrine.



Deputy Prime Minister D. Rogozin spoke about the main innovations of the updated document. At the beginning of his speech, he recalled that the Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation is a key and backbone document of the national maritime policy. This document was developed by the Maritime Board under the Russian government. In addition, representatives of the Navy and some related structures participated in the work. In total, 15 departments, structures and organizations were involved in the creation of the updated Doctrine.

D. Rogozin explained the reasons for the appearance of the updated version of the Maritime Doctrine. The document that existed so far was adopted in 2001 and defined the country's maritime policy up to 2020. However, recently there has been a serious change in the situation in the international arena, as well as the position of the Russian navy. The changing situation in the world and the strengthening of Russia as a maritime power led to the need to create an updated and improved version of the Maritime Doctrine.

In the updated Doctrine there are four so-called. functional areas and six so-called. regional directions that determine the further development of the maritime policy and related areas. The functional areas include naval activities, maritime transport, marine science and the development of mineral resources. Regional areas: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian, Indian Ocean and Antarctic.

D. Rogozin noted that Antarctica appeared in the list of regional directions, since this area of ​​the planet is of great interest for Russia. In addition, quite a lot of different events have been developing in this region lately. However, the Antarctic direction is not a priority. The main accents in the new Maritime Doctrine are made in the Arctic and Atlantic directions. The reasons for this are simple and related to events in the international arena. The Atlantic is of particular interest to Russia in connection with the activities and development of NATO, whose borders are approaching our country. Accordingly, a certain answer is required to such a policy of Western countries.

The second reason for interest in the Atlantic region is associated with plans for areas of the Black and Mediterranean Seas. After the return of the Crimea and Sevastopol to Russia, it is necessary to take all measures aimed at the early integration of new subjects of the federation into the economy of the whole country. In addition, the presence of the Russian Navy in the Mediterranean, which also belongs to the Atlantic region, should be strengthened.

According to the Deputy Prime Minister, the special priority of the Arctic is also related to certain events in the political and economic sphere. Of great importance in this context is the Northern Sea Route, which provides unhindered access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. In addition, the continental shelf of the Arctic is rich in various minerals, which should also be taken into account when conducting its policies. D. Rogozin also recalled that at the present time work is underway to build a new atomic icebreaking fleet. In 2017, 2019 and 2020, three new icebreakers will join the work.

Touching upon the topic of minerals, the Deputy Prime Minister also noted that the updated Maritime Doctrine paid increased attention to the environmental aspects of activities in the Arctic region. It is important not only to develop mineral resources, but also to preserve the natural resources for future generations.

In the new version of the Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation, a section appeared that was absent in the previous version of this document. Particular attention is paid to the development of shipbuilding. According to D. Rogozin, the emergence of such a section is directly related to the success of the domestic industry achieved over the past 10-15 years. During this time, it was possible to restore the capabilities of the shipbuilding industry. Thus, the volumes of military shipbuilding, according to the vice-premier, are comparable with those tasks that were solved in the times of the Soviet Union.

The Doctrine also focuses on civilian and commercial fleets. For the development of this direction it is proposed to stimulate the creation of private shipbuilding companies. Such organizations have already managed to show their best. It is proposed to pay attention to them in the future.

D. Rogozin recalled the existence of a section of the Maritime Doctrine, which deals with issues of state management of maritime activities. In particular, this section specifies the role of the Maritime Collegium under the government, as well as clarifies the responsibilities of other government bodies. Thanks to this, immediately after the approval of the Doctrine, all organizations involved in the formulation of the maritime policy can begin to develop the entire list of documents relating to the planning of the country's maritime activities in the short, medium and long term.

In addition to political, economic and military issues, the updated Maritime Doctrine also addresses social issues. According to President V. Putin, the updated version of this document for the first time in the domestic practice includes provisions of a social nature. Thus, a number of measures have been proposed aimed at preserving the health of seafarers and specialists in the maritime industry. In addition, there are some other innovations that affect the social aspects of the country's maritime activities.

A new version of the Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation has been drawn up and approved by the president. This means that all organizations associated with the definition of a country's maritime policy can begin drafting new guidance documents that take into account the provisions of the updated Doctrine. The first results of these works may appear in the next few years. At the end of the current decade, the development of a new Maritime Doctrine, which will take effect from 2020, is likely to begin.


On the materials of the sites:
http://kremlin.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://interfax.ru/

Full text of the updated Marine Doctrine of the Russian Federation: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/uAFi5nvux2twaqjftS5yrIZUVTJan77L.pdf
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    28 July 2015 07: 47
    Congratulations on the past day of the Navy of all the seaman !!! soldier
    1. +14
      28 July 2015 07: 56
      “All our affairs will be overthrown if the fleet is spent.”
      - “Military business is the first of worldly affairs, which is most important for the defense of our Fatherland”
      - "... Any potentate that has a single ground army has one arm, and which the navy has both arms"
      - "Through military action, Russia came out from darkness to light."
      -the creation of a new Russia associated with "nothing else, only the fleet"
      Peter 1

      From myself I join the congratulation !!!
      1. +2
        28 July 2015 12: 43
        Guys! For twenty years I was looking at the Sevastopol Bay ... "and for the State it was insulting" .., but now the soul simply sings and the eye rejoices. The power of Russia is felt. It's time to show the enemies who is the boss on the seas.
  2. +15
    28 July 2015 08: 17
    Judging by the doctrine, our leaders decided that we need an ocean fleet. In this regard, it parses curiosity whether I will survive until the moment when at least one destroyer will be laid on the slipways. Already hear, no money yet. But I do not believe in this. It is enough to listen to competent people who are not members of a cooperative on the robbery of the country. Judge for yourself, a 4-generation destroyer like Arly Burke costs $ 1,2 billion. Abramovich’s yacht costs about half that amount.

    Is it called in the country no money?
    1. +4
      28 July 2015 09: 11
      Quote: fomkin
      Is it called in the country no money?



      I have said for a long time that if our moneybags were attracted to voluntary-compulsory donations, in 10-15 years it would be possible to build a mighty fleet ... Even for their narcissism, even new ships will be named after them ... Of course, an underwater missile A cruiser under the Abramovich would sound grotesque, but it would really be !!!
      1. +6
        28 July 2015 09: 33
        Quote: veksha50
        I have said for a long time that if our moneybags were attracted to voluntary-compulsory donations, in 10-15 years it would be possible to build a mighty fleet ... Even for their narcissism, even new ships will be named after them ... Of course, an underwater missile A cruiser under the Abramovich would sound grotesque, but it would really be !!!

        Everything is so, but without the economy, even if the hotbych gives us a new fleet, we will not be able to adequately feed it. I am for the fleet or even the navy, but the economy should be pulled to the level of leaders and trade goods with the whole world. Give me a Lamborghini, but I won't feed this horse with my economy-income, it will die in a year because of bad gasoline and old filters. The oligarchs can be "persuaded" to give money for the fleet, but who will support? The economy of China would have our technologies and ambitions, the end of America's hegemony, but the Asians are on their minds, and we do not have an economy like theirs yet. We ought to find friends all over the world, as much as necessary !!!! They are, but this friendship is not yet clear, time will tell. And somehow keep the defense while all this time is necessary ...
        1. +7
          28 July 2015 10: 22
          Quote: RIDIK
          The oligarchs can be "persuaded" to give money for the fleet, but who will support?



          The age-old question: "What to do ???" ...

          Unambiguous thoughts are inspired ... Again, the ideas of Marxism-Leninism are recalled ...

          PS Without a state economy, this issue cannot be resolved ... So from this the corresponding conclusion follows ...
        2. dyksi
          +1
          28 July 2015 14: 34
          Without a fleet, the country will go into the Stone Age, since the fleet is on guard of maritime communications, there will be no fleet, you will be squeezed out of it, and 80-90% of the trade goes through these maritime communications, so do not be mistaken, there is no fleet strong powers and economies, a strong fleet, helped the United States take control of all sea lanes, two more haemorrhoids are brewing in the Far East, Japan and China, which are no longer embarrassed to speak of our Far East and Siberia as their own, and without a fleet, war you won’t win against them and nuclear weapons cannot be used against them. The fleet is needed, and by and large it is needed already the day before yesterday, China and Japan are building their fleet just at a crazy pace, multi-purpose, aircraft carrier and it is for expansion into our Far East and further to our northern communications, where there is a lot of oil and gas, but very little navy .
      2. +2
        28 July 2015 14: 13
        Quote: veksha50
        I have already said for a long time that if we attracted our moneybags to voluntary-forced donations, a powerful fleet could be built in 10-15 years ...

        And if you begin to take away the top managers of the stolen honestly stolen from corrupt officials, then you can build an aircraft carrier fleet and shipyards, and buy military aircraft in the required quantities and will remain in Armata with the resumption of production of TU-160 ... hi
      3. 0
        28 July 2015 23: 07
        Quote: veksha50
        Of course, a missile submarine under Abramovich would sound grotesque, but it would really be !!!

        What mushrooms have you tried? You would have made a missile cruiser under the chase "Sonya - the golden handle". Or "Black Cat". Actually, IN ANY NORMAL COUNTRY, THIEFS SIT IN PRISON. AND WE HAVE THEY FRIENDS, KORESHA, EFFECTIVE MANAGERS AND MARKETS.
    2. +5
      28 July 2015 09: 18
      the creation of a miliarderof oligarchof is the MOST priority task of this government ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +9
      28 July 2015 09: 39
      Quote: fomkin
      Judging by the doctrine, our leaders decided that we need an ocean fleet.


      Judging by the meaning and the SUBTEXT of the Doctrine, the main thing for our leaders and the oligarchs covered by them is to replenish their pockets by increasing oil production on the shelf and comprehensive, primarily military, ensuring this production. See the root! (Kozma Rods)
    5. +2
      28 July 2015 11: 59
      And the point is to attract them if they have all the money in circulation and this will already be a private combat fleet.
    6. -2
      28 July 2015 12: 50
      Patience is my friend, patience. At least a vector has been outlined, I think everything further moves on. It was also hard to believe in the Olympics in Sochi, and the fact that Crimea was with us, who thought that this was possible even in the year 13? The main thing to think and act, for an instant of 25 years of ruin, cannot be turned into a fairy garden.
      1. +3
        28 July 2015 15: 45
        Quote: Quager
        in an instant 25 years of devastation cannot be turned into a fairy garden.


        Is this devastation? After the war there was devastation! Millions of people lived in the basements of destroyed houses, in dugouts, barracks, thousands of important objects were destroyed (power plants, bridges, factories, ports, pipelines, power lines, hospitals, runways, etc.) and under Stalin ALL THIS was restored in 15 years! And they not only restored, but also went ahead in many areas (nuclear power, space ...). And these "effective managers" for a quarter of a century divide what the people have created before them and give out fantastic projects of what they themselves do not believe in! There are amateurs at all levels of government, so there are no results!
        1. -1
          28 July 2015 21: 30
          Devastation in the minds, do not forget about it, dear
        2. 0
          29 July 2015 08: 15
          I will give a detailed answer (otherwise, put incomprehensible disadvantages) after the Second World War, our people were united and monolithic, we won the war, we had military-industrial production with might and main, the country was united with a single idea and aspirations of fraternal peoples (well, bonuses in the form of contributions ). And what do we have after "perestroika" and "parade of sovereignties"? In fact, we lost the "cold war": the country collapsed, and with the severing of all economic ties, at the head of the country is an alcoholic with tsarist manners, instead of socialism "on the street" wild capitalism. A people without a common goal, without God and a single national idea, with one desire to survive, fill their pockets and climb higher.
          Do you understand the difference? We are still reaping the fruits of all this. All these "effective managers" are essentially the same people.
    7. dyksi
      +4
      28 July 2015 14: 19
      So, like twenty trillion of money for the purchase of weapons was, where did they go? New weapons in the army and navy can be counted on one hand, but the money is gone. In order to protect Russia's interests in the world, a good surface fleet is needed, but it does not exist and is unlikely to appear in the near future, at least until 2020, as I understand it, the construction of frigates and destroyers is not envisaged, and the same corvettes , only boats, tugs, large landing craft, scientific ships. I read the interesting news. Russia will not deploy Tu-22M3s in Crimea, this is what Western "partners" asked for.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        28 July 2015 14: 39
        Quote: dyksi
        So it seemed like twenty trillion arms purchase money, where did they go? New weapons in the army and navy can be counted on the fingers, but there is no money



        the question is clearly contrived in Russia there is no control over the expenditure of funds for megaprojects, but then the control over the expenditure on SALES is total for ordinary people
        read about the Russian fleet, how will it withstand the American in case of war ...
        http://www.rusproject.org/node/1668
  3. +5
    28 July 2015 08: 19
    Well, at least I would sometimes write obscenities .. Cyril ... well, it’s not clear what kind of doctrine it is ??? .... what exactly are we going to build? in what numbers .... what priority ships, fleets ?? The development of bases on long coasts will or will not .... What will happen to the USC? ... after all, at that rate and kickbacks, all the doctrines into the furnace ..... I would like to specify the doctrine ... can anyone dispel the fog?))
    1. +1
      28 July 2015 09: 14
      Quote: gispanec
      Well, it’s not clear what kind of doctrine is this ???



      I personally realized that special attention will be paid to influence in the Atlantic, the Arctic and the Mediterranean ... Well, Antarctica goes even further ...

      Spheres are marked, and by no means can they please the USA ...

      But what exactly to build - this is not dictated by a doctrine, but by the State Program, which proceeds precisely from the doctrine and - economic opportunities ...
      1. 0
        28 July 2015 09: 38
        Quote: veksha50
        I personally realized that special attention

        ?? ... hu ist Especially ATTENTION ??? ... we will watch through the satellite around the clock?)))
    2. 0
      28 July 2015 13: 56
      Read the doctrine, everything is written down by direction and priority tasks of each individual fleet and direction (Black Sea-Azov direction, Pacific direction, Arctic direction, etc.) Besides the fleet, the tasks of infrastructure development, fishing, transport, personnel, etc. ...
      The author of this article pointed out innovations and trends that were more interesting in his opinion ...
      It should be understood that a doctrine is not a "road map" in its direct understanding, it is a concept from which to dance.
      If interested, the doctrine can be downloaded from the official website http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060
  4. BMW
    +3
    28 July 2015 08: 27
    Finally, the movement began, otherwise there is nothing to repair. Ship repair has almost bent, neither specialists nor production facilities. Out is complete, and financial assistance should be provided in the form of a significant reduction in tax pressure, because it balances on the verge of profitability. The price is such that the large-capacity fleet went abroad for repairs. Although the quality of repair there is not at all better than ours, with all our squalor.
    And shipbuilding is also unprofitable, it’s expensive to build, and not every company can afford to buy a new ship.
    We have to restore the MPC with the replacement of the casing and partly a set, with the installation of new diesel engines and equipment - cheaper than buying a new one. And they do not build them anymore, the plant in Blagoveshchensk is no longer engaged in this. The latest MPCs were built in 2012 - 4 pcs., Bought a company from the village. Lake (Kamchatka).
  5. +1
    28 July 2015 08: 54
    The beginning is, what will be the continuation? Why it is not said about the Pacific frontiers, about submarines, now and in the future there will be the main confrontation here, as the author wrote in fits and starts, the commercial fleet is already Antarctica, the main thing is to build and build as best as possible more (in all directions)
    1. 0
      28 July 2015 09: 17
      Quote: 31rus
      about the Pacific frontiers, about submarines, now and in the future it will be here main confrontation,as



      Why do you think that main confrontation will be in the Pacific ??? !!!
      1. 0
        29 July 2015 08: 23
        Three world powers Russia, China, America only here have "points of contact", further unresolved "issues" Russia-Japan (the latter is intensively building a fleet), China-Taiwan, China-Japan, China-Vietnam, China-India, Australia- Indonesia, South
        South Korea and North Korea, you are not enough, the Chinese strive for additives in the Arctic, here the most acute so far "sleeping" contradictions
  6. +2
    28 July 2015 09: 06
    "So, the volume of military shipbuilding, according to the Deputy Prime Minister, is comparable to the tasks that were solved during the Soviet Union" ...

    Well, here Rogozin embellishes ... Both volumes and objects are not the same, and until the ships cease to depend on foreign manufacturers of marine power plants, there can be no comparison with the Union ...

    But - most importantly - that shipbuilding is not just being restored, but is developing ...

    And, importantly, they raised the question of building a civilian commercial fleet, which was once the largest in the world ...
    1. +3
      28 July 2015 22: 12
      Quote: veksha50
      Well, here Rogozin embellishes ...

      Yes, he doesn’t decorate, but brazenly rubs glasses for all those who don’t know. For a year and a month, the USSR built the nuclear submarines, from bookmarks to delivery, the entire range of warships from a minesweeper to an aircraft carrier (if you consider Ulyanovsk, and Kuzmich is still more likely an aircraft carrier than an aircraft carrier cruiser), and we? Corvettes / frigates with difficulty and even without import supplies of EU got up immediately. I imagine such a situation in the USSR ... no, I can’t imagine. laughing
      Quote: veksha50
      But - most importantly - that shipbuilding is not just being restored, but is developing ...

      That's right, just Rogozin with his "blah blah blah" is out of place.
      Quote: veksha50
      And, importantly, they raised the question of building a civilian commercial fleet, which was once the largest in the world ...

      As for the largest in the world - this is something doubtful, and so - yes, it’s crucial that they remembered their own civilian fleet.
  7. +2
    28 July 2015 09: 37
    The article does not contain information on doctrine.
  8. -2
    28 July 2015 10: 02
    In the photo, really men worried about the interests of Russia
  9. +1
    28 July 2015 12: 01
    Change do not change the sea doctrine, and things are still there - there are no ships.
  10. +1
    28 July 2015 12: 05
    In addition, the continental shelf of the Arctic is rich in various minerals, which should also be taken into account when pursuing its policy.

    This is the main thing. All other words are a veil. New sources of income for rapidly swarming oligarchs are needed.
  11. +3
    28 July 2015 13: 23
    Be sure to change the attitude towards the situation. A year ago, I observed in the Mediterranean our military support vessel built in the 50s. I will tell you, a very sad picture that causes only laughter among our Western and not only neighbors. I want to believe there was hope for the revival of the strength and power of the Russian fleet! It’s time, brothers, to return our positions, it’s time ...
  12. 0
    28 July 2015 16: 28
    Doctrine, it’s good! It remains somewhere to take new ships and vessels, so that the doctrine does not remain a concussion. The inheritance from the USSR is aging, but there isn’t a new one, if there is, then it’s not enough
  13. 0
    28 July 2015 16: 40
    The doctrine is written about the Arctic, about some types of ships and atomic ice drifts there is the same thing, but about the carrier ships of the aircraft - well, I somehow did not see it.
  14. 0
    28 July 2015 17: 45
    Quote: NEXUS
    Quote: veksha50
    I have already said for a long time that if we attracted our moneybags to voluntary-forced donations, a powerful fleet could be built in 10-15 years ...

    And if you begin to take away the top managers of the stolen honestly stolen from corrupt officials, then you can build an aircraft carrier fleet and shipyards, and buy military aircraft in the required quantities and will remain in Armata with the resumption of production of TU-160 ... hi


    Incidentally, such an approach was implemented in the late 1960s in South Korea, when those who looked after the country from the United States were tired of changing dictators and suppressing riots almost every year. A round table was held at which each major clan was divided into a sector of responsibility in the development of industry. And yet it went well.
  15. +2
    28 July 2015 18: 48
    This is not a doctrine or a strategy - so - some kind of wishlist. There is no substantiation and elaboration of both the entire "doctrine" and its constituent parts (in other words, neither the strategy, nor the tactics of implementation) - only now, it should be there. That should be here ... And how to do it - no one knows ... It seems - let them decide on the ground ... So we will rush from side to side with such a "doctrine" ...
  16. +4
    28 July 2015 19: 03
    Thus, the volumes of military shipbuilding, according to the Deputy Prime Minister, are comparable with those tasks that were solved during the Soviet Union.

    Yap our vice prime minister
    In the USSR, we built ships of all types, including destroyers and BODs, very monstrous (and extremely high-tech at that time) nuclear-powered missile cruisers, heavy aircraft-carrying cruisers and (with the Ulyanovsk bookmark) aircraft carriers. Nuclear submarines were baked like cakes - for example, magnificent nuclear submarines such as "Pike-B" - "Shark" K-284 - laid down in November 1983, went into operation - December 1984! 13 months! And this is a ship the size of an Ash!
    1. +2
      29 July 2015 10: 04
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Yap our vice prime minister


      He is not a yap, but just an amateur (to put it mildly), like almost everyone in the government, starting with the LADY, the theoretician parquet leader who learns the world from the iPhone screen. Everyone has forgotten the postulate "cadres decide everything"! Of all the current shobla of ministers, governors and "effective managers" appointed by the "leader of the nation," Stalin (and even Brezhnev) would leave, in my opinion, only Lavrov. And Medvedev, Pukin, Chubais, Serdyukov, etc. he would just shoot, I'm sure.
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      In the USSR, we built ships of all types,

      That's for sure! And the planes went to the Air Force in the hundreds every year, and the ships in the dozens, and no one trumpeted about it, this was taken for granted, daily work! And now they’ll build a couple of boats, a dozen aircraft and present it as a triumph of power, lifting Russia from its knees ...
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    28 July 2015 23: 40
    I am touched by some of our comrades, which they cite as an example of the USSR. Yes, then more military equipment was riveted. And what? Did it help us a lot? And right now, you can probably throw EVERYTHING and spank 5 destroyers a year. But will our people stand it? That's the question! Here they cited the example of Abramovich and even dreamed of expropriating the expropriators for the construction of the Great Ocean Fleet and other "wunderwaffle". And it was unaware that they had already passed this path: they began in 1917 and collapsed in 1991, and they surrendered everything with joy and songs, despite the mighty Army and Navy. Is it worth risking a new attack on the old rake. I agree that our elite must be tightened up and pressed. But not like in 1936-37, this has already passed. All these convulsive movements can have a short-term effect, followed by a collapse of the economy, a drop in morale, patriotism, and so on ... A systematic approach is needed. Is he there? We will see. Well, the Fleet is the fleet, of course, but right now, another component of defense is more important: air defense, anti-aircraft defense and strategic missile forces.
  19. Dam
    0
    29 July 2015 01: 40
    The doctrine is good, to add more ships to it!
  20. kig
    0
    29 July 2015 02: 21
    In general, the country of Russia is being created from pole to pole ...

    1.8 billion rubles were stolen at the construction of the Vostochny cosmodrome
    More than 4 billion rubles were stolen at the construction of the Zvezda shipyard
    At the construction of the Oceanarium in Vladivostok, 5 billion rubles were stolen

    According to forecasts of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, in 2014, real incomes of the population should have increased by 2,5% [78]. However, in reality, in 2014 revenues decreased by 0,8% compared to 2013 [79]. The decline in real income in 2014 was observed for the first time since 1999 [3]. Systematically, Russian incomes began to fall in November 2014 [79].

    In 2015, the decline in real income continued. So, for the first half of the year income fell by 3,1%, and in June - by 3,5%
  21. 0
    29 July 2015 06: 50
    Quote: fomkin
    Judging by the doctrine, our leaders decided that we need an ocean fleet.


    the main doctrine that needs to be adopted and implemented is to stop robbing the country and people, and everything else will follow
  22. -1
    29 July 2015 07: 03
    ... no one canceled the dialectic
    Marx's doctrine dragged to a dump
    Just because I adopted the dogma
    Union, which famously pulled ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"