Vladimir Putin approved changes to the Russian Maritime Doctrine

July 27 2015 23

On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved changes to the Russian Maritime Doctrine that affect relations with NATO.

In particular, defining the maritime policy in the Atlantic region, the document points to "the conditions existing in this region, focused only on the organization of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO), as well as the imperfection of the legal mechanisms for ensuring international security."

“The decisive factor in relations with NATO remains the unacceptability for Russia of plans to advance the military infrastructure of the alliance to its borders and attempts to impart global functions to it,” he quotes from the doctrine Interfax.

It is also noted that the basis of the maritime policy of the Russian Federation in this direction is the solution of long-term tasks in the Atlantic Ocean, on the Black, Baltic and Azov seas, as well as in the Mediterranean Sea. In particular, much attention is paid to "ensuring a sufficient naval presence of the Russian Federation in the region."

In the Azov and Black Seas, "the foundation of the national maritime policy is the accelerated restoration and comprehensive strengthening of the strategic positions of the Russian Federation, and the maintenance of peace and stability in the region."

The document notes that under these conditions, "improving the composition and structure of the forces of the Black Sea fleet, the development of their infrastructure in the Crimea and on the coast of the Krasnodar Territory ", as well as" ensuring the transport accessibility of Crimea, the development of ferry lines in the direction of Krasnodar Territory - Crimea ".

In the Mediterranean, the basis of the Russian maritime policy is “to pursue a focused course towards becoming a zone of military-political stability and good neighborliness, ensuring an adequate naval presence of the Russian Federation in the region on a permanent basis.”

In the arctic regional direction, the maritime policy base is: “reducing the level of threats to the national security of the Russian Federation and ensuring strategic stability in the arctic region; strengthening the naval potential of the Russian Federation, the development of the forces (troops) of the Northern Fleet; strengthening the economic potential of the Russian Federation by expanding the use of the natural resources of the continental shelf, including exploration and other provisions.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

svp67

+2

27 July 2015 05: 48

In the Mediterranean, the basis of the Russian maritime policy is “to pursue a focused course towards becoming a zone of military-political stability and good neighborliness, ensuring an adequate naval presence of the Russian Federation in the region on a permanent basis.”
That is, an analogue of the Soviet "operational squadron" but already ours, the Russian one will be created there de jure. And it is right. There would be more new ships ...
1. VseDoFeNi
  
  +2
  
  27 July 2015 07: 29
  
  Quote: svp67
  Still new ships for more ...
  
  Still we have more people. Women don't want to give birth. There is a wonderful article written by a woman - "When white humanity began to die out"
  Quote: http://domestic-lynx.livejournal.com/23214.html
  And Europeans, with all their prosperity, still do not give birth.
  
  Because this is not an economic problem at all: giving birth or not giving birth. Children are not in the wallet, but in the head.
  
  When did it all begin - extinction?
  After all, women gave birth - over there in Russia, according to the pre-revolutionary census, each gave out six pieces on average. Well, even if half were dying (in fact, less), but still the population grew: there was someone to put under arms, and - later - to send to the construction sites of communism. In neighboring Germany, the picture is the same. Winner Sombart, a classic of sociology with political economy, wrote on the eve of World War I that Germans reproduce like rabbits. About rabbits is his own original expression. Actually, the old German idea of "Drang nach Osten" was not invented by Hitler and Goebbels at all - it was born much earlier and was rooted in the national feeling: there is little land, but we are becoming more and more.
  Now it’s not.
  There is simply no time for a normal German woman to give birth. Judge for yourself: when? Up to forty years old - early, she expresses herself, makes a career. And after forty it’s too late: the probability of giving birth to the downside increases, and countries are not all visited and studied. Well, some people manage to slip through, but, of course, no more than one descendant. And those 1,2 from Buchanan's plate (I don't remember exactly, maybe 1,3) - this is provided by the "come in large numbers" Turks and others like them.
  I remember once walking around the center of Amsterdam and came across a kindergarten for a walk. From a third to half are children of non-European appearance. Their parents are not lazy.
  1. Horn
    
    0
    
    27 July 2015 08: 09
    
    The "child killer", strange as it sounds, is the pension system. As soon as a system appears in the state that allows elderly people NOT to live on dependent children, the birth rate immediately falls.
    There are serious scientific papers on this subject.
    1. VseDoFeNi
      
      +3
      
      27 July 2015 09: 01
      
      Quote: Horn
      Strange as it may sound, "child killer" is a pension system
      
      The pension system is a means of attracting money by bankers. Accordingly, it is capitalism and usury with industrialization that are killers of children.
      Quote: Horn
      As soon as a system appears in the state that allows elderly people to NOT live on dependent children, the birth rate immediately drops.
      
      As soon as the state begins the exodus from the natural habitat to the city, the birth rate immediately drops.
      Quote: Horn
      There are serious scientific papers on this subject.
      
      There are serious works on any topic and on directly opposite topics, too.
      The first deception sounds like this: scientists are innocent of environmental disasters - politicians, officials and businessmen are to blame.
      
      But it should be remembered that these people themselves are not able to come up with anything new.
      
      Various concepts for environmental destruction have always been invented by scientists themselves; which convinced politicians that these discoveries would bring tremendous benefits to all of humanity, and only then received financial support.
      
      However, when hopes for a brighter future are crumbling, our so-called inventors say that they only carried out a political order!
      
      The second deception sounds like this: when some scientists, through their activities, destroy the environment, it is imperative to turn to other “scholars” to correct the monstrous consequences of the former.
      
      But it should be remembered that pests are not able to fix anything!
      
      Moreover, all the talk that bad consequences can be eliminated with the help of science leads only to a new round of all kinds of research and terrible discoveries that damage nature even more!
      
      People do not need new discoveries! They need fresh air, clean water, natural food!
2. The comment was deleted.
3. siberalt
  
  0
  
  27 July 2015 07: 47
  
  It is high time. There is nothing to open their eyes when they see our fleet and aircraft in the Atlantic. Now everything will be according to the doctrine and, as it were, quite officially. Russia has designated its geopolitical interests not as regional, but global, and that’s right. The form should objectively correspond to the content.
  1. Tanais
    
    0
    
    27 July 2015 07: 59
    
    IN, Events
    Vladimir Putin approved changes to the Russian Maritime Doctrine
    
    On Sunday, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved changes to the Russian Maritime Doctrine that affect relations with NATO.
    
    "Affects", to put it mildly ... The document is fundamental, closing the "gaps" in the concept of development and reform of the Armed Forces, and is also a tool to counter the ever-growing threat from outside ...
4. Skif83
  
  0
  
  27 July 2015 09: 53
  
  Right, right, just now ... in order to understand this you need to be in power for fifteen years? Not a little tight "dumalka"?
bender8282

0

27 July 2015 05: 55

and banter with "cook" immediately came to my mind)))
1. Dangerous
  
  +5
  
  27 July 2015 08: 33
  
  A banter by a banter, but this, like in the video, should not be repeated! Of course I’ll catch the cons from ardent patriots now. But on the holiday of the day of the Navy, such disgrace is unacceptably simple! And by the way, why isn’t there a separate article on this topic here? After all, if this happened with American technology, there would be topic number 1!
  1. Lyton
    
    0
    
    27 July 2015 09: 20
    
    And dill has so much joy in connection with this incident, already nightingales are filled with delight.
  2. Boa kaa
    
    +1
    
    27 July 2015 10: 17
    
    Quote: Dangerous
    But on the holiday of the day of the Navy, such disgrace is unacceptably simple!
    
    Unfortunately "ugliness" does not choose when to happen: on holidays or weekdays.
    Shooting * Rastrubrm * is nothing extraordinary. Usually, the starters threw * a suitcase * meters on the 500. The public was announced that there was an imitation by the ship of its main PLO. And everything was * zer gut *. The audience is delighted, the command is pretty.
    The video clearly shows the defective actuation of the starters. Moreover, cutting off the fastening dressings and separating the starter and the product. The reason for the failure is purely technical. It's RTB's fault. Apparently the "pest" will be looking for there.
    But there is another option. * Disposal * by firing a product with an expired warranty period. Then * wise drivers * will be responsible for this, trying to save a combat product for hard times.
    In any case, the URA commission is already turning inside out the RTB with its storage facilities and documentation on product maintenance, and the General Staff Committee of the Navy - documentation on preparations for the parade.
    Let's wait for what the OBS says. IMHO.
  3. Vadim237
    
    +1
    
    27 July 2015 10: 17
    
    The rocket was already unfit to see.
    1. Tanais
      
      0
      
      27 July 2015 11: 12
      
      Quote: Vadim237
      The rocket was already unfit to see.
      
      From the warehouses of the Ukrainian Navy, inherited by the Russian fleet ...
      
      Such an option is also possible ...
Same lech

+1

27 July 2015 05: 56

Thank God the leadership in KREMLIN truly took up the modernization of the army and navy of RUSSIA .... for as we know and how we were convinced of KREMLIN, RUSSIA only two true friends ready to fight for our people to death is the ARMY AND Navy OF RUSSIA.

I wish the sailors seven feet under the keel and good luck in military affairs.
1. Krasmash
  
  +1
  
  27 July 2015 06: 12
  
  Quote: The same LYOKHA
  Thank God the leadership in KREMLIN truly took on the modernization of the army and navy of RUSSIA
  
  Let’s take a look at what Putin’s receiver will do. Oh, if only the liberalist wouldn’t get caught.
  1. Alexander Romanov
    
    +1
    
    27 July 2015 06: 55
    
    Quote: Krasmash
    
    Let's see what Putin’s receiver will do
    
    And that Putin is leaving somewhere?
    1. Krasmash
      
      +1
      
      27 July 2015 07: 16
      
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Quote: Krasmash
      
      Let's see what Putin’s receiver will do
      
      And that Putin is leaving somewhere?
      
      Naturally, not yet. But I am more and more worried about the question of who will stand behind the helm after it.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        
        0
        
        27 July 2015 07: 18
        
        Quote: Krasmash
        .But I am more and more worried about the question of who will stand behind the helm after it.
        
        The king will be.
        
        Krasmash
        
        -3
        
        27 July 2015 07: 29
        
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: Krasmash
        .But I am more and more worried about the question of who will stand behind the helm after it.
        
        The king will be.
        
        There will be Romanov, who is from Vladik, the new dynasty, and Tsarina Scarlet Johansen. We will live right away.
      2. Vadim237
        
        -1
        
        27 July 2015 10: 20
        
        I will be for Kadyrov, if he will label him as prime minister.
Mikhail m

0

27 July 2015 05: 56

For a long time, a long time ago this was not. Fear, mongrel, the bear began to get up!
Dezinto

+7

27 July 2015 06: 13

In Sevastopol, the rocket did not regularly come out, well, in general, it crumbled. So I decided to have fun watching the media soon ...... in general - in short, they defeated us instantly! Raska crumbles and stuff, stuff, stuff ...

I tried to argue that in the first place - they do not use new rockets in the exercises, but use those with an expiration date already - because the new rocket stands like a cast-iron bridge! And to use new missiles in the parade is simply not rational.

Secondly, a country that has ruined its own industry is simply in the trash! - giant Soviet factories - closed - forever! - and they certainly mock us cheerfully, .... well .. well .. we have a parade with thousands of ships and two mistakes, ..... and what these nerds have ???? inflatable boats from Canada? .... damn hokh.ly such hokh.ly ... the main thing is that the cow would die from the neighbor ... or the rocket did not fly ....- about too much!

But of course with sound arguments, but on the sites coming out! - immediately - in the ban. Svidomo Cho then explain ... this is of course useless work.
1. Same lech
  
  +1
  
  27 July 2015 08: 21
  
  But of course with sound arguments, but on the sites coming out! - immediately - in the ban.
  
  I sympathize and am not surprised ... I went through it myself ... I'm tired of beating my forehead against the wall of the Maydan there.
2. Boa kaa
  
  +2
  
  27 July 2015 10: 46
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  And to use new missiles in the parade is simply not rational.
  Good morning, Nikolai!
  The thing is that the parade is not only a military-technical, but also a very large military-political event, demonstrating the power of the Armed Forces. To get rid of at such an * event * is tantamount to putting an end to future service. In 37, the cut-off (if not more!) Would definitely be provided. This is the time
  Second, the no one with military products in the parade * bullets *: practice is used for drowning. When * firing * KR and URPK - the launchers throw the blank out of the container, indicating the "start" of the combat item. In another way, shooting from the water area of the Northern Bay of Sevastopol is simply impossible: there are international sea routes around, which are simply not realistic to close.
  So, it’s all about the abnormal operation of the starting boosters. They are solid fuel, and you yourself know what it is.
  Sincerely.
barclay

+2

27 July 2015 06: 15

Everything is clear and understandable, named after their own names. I would like to believe that with the updated naval doctrine the fleet itself will be updated faster.
pvv113

+3

27 July 2015 06: 51

Something in the article did not affect the Pacific Ocean, but Russia also has considerable interests there
1. Boa kaa
  
  +1
  
  27 July 2015 10: 57
  
  Quote: pvv113
  Something in the article did not affect the Pacific Ocean, but Russia also has considerable interests there
  
  Yes, but the pipe and hydrocarbons are located where the increased presence of the fleet is updated with the updated doctrine.
  So, everything is logical, but I would like, of course, more ... But so far there are not enough resources. Moreover, there is so far a reconciliation with the hongfuz.
  Something like that, in my opinion. However, I could be wrong ...
Horn

0

27 July 2015 08: 11

On the other hand, Alexander Golts, deputy editor-in-chief of Ezhednevny Zhurnal, at Matza’s Ear, believes that the approved amendments are meaningless. Of course, they do not provide for the delivery of ships "on pins and needles"!
schurick911

0

27 July 2015 08: 33

The same LYOKHA, but can you imagine what if we assume the temporary informational isolation of Russia? What will Ukrsmi talk about then? In my opinion, there will be a collapse and after a complete apathy, like the zombies in "War of the Worlds Z", waiting for stimulus :))
Boa kaa

+1

27 July 2015 11: 21

The political significance of the statements made by the Supreme on board * Gorshkov * is obvious. This is a signal to our partners and * sympathizers * that Russia seriously intends to protect its economic and geopolitical interests in the Mediterranean and the Arctic. And for this she will have a strong argument in the form of ship formations in these strategically important regions of the World Ocean for the country.
But all this will remain well-intentioned if in the near future no new ships appear - an instrument of this * Marine Doctrine *. Therefore, Rogozin in vain * crushes * his nose * on the box. He really needs to think hard how to accomplish the task in the time allotted by the Supreme. The SDO on the construction of ships rolls * to the right *, like that armored train that fell off the siding!
The promised ships will appear, then you can give out interviews. In the meantime, apparently, it’s too early to talk about increasing the presence: So far there is simply no one to attend.
IMHO.