Wasserman: I really do not envy the enemies of Muammar Gaddafi

Wasserman: I really do not envy the enemies of Muammar GaddafiAnatoly Wasserman - about why the Gaddafi case will gain a new life.


I have not spoken for a long time about the events of October 20, hoping to get reliable data from independent sources. But every hour is more obvious: the words of Otto Edward Leopold Karl-Wilhelm Ferdinandovich, Duke von Lauenburg Prince von Bismarck und Schonhausen “Never lie so much as before the election, during the war and after the hunt” still remain as immutable as and a half century ago.

So far, unfortunately, only one thing is certain: Sirte - the hometown of Muammar Muhammadovich Gaddafi - is bombed aviation NATO is in a state that practically excludes the existence of living remnants of the population in it, so that mercenaries (from Egyptian Islamists proclaimed by the Benghaz Democrats in February to militants brought in from Afghanistan) entered the depopulated territory without much interference. But the fate of the Colonel himself is still the subject of serious doubt.

The main source of doubt is in the United States of America. This is the server for YouTube’s most popular online video storage system. The first of the clips depicting the public assassination of the generally accepted moral leader of Libya (and even a noticeable part of the rest of the world) was there at about two in the morning on October 10, that is, long before the official dating of the events shown there.

Experts found many others will accept the dubious information about the murder of Gaddafi. Yes, and I myself saw the body with easily recognizable face and the same easily recognizable Y-visible seam from the autopsy in the Russian TV news, and after a couple of hours I heard from the same news official statements by NATO mercenaries: there was no autopsy and there will not be.

Something similar should have been expected, at least since the western 8 TV channels on August 2008 were shown amicably shots of Georgian shelling of Tskhinval with captions “Russia is shooting at the Georgian city of Gori”. Every day, modern professional journalism less and less reflects the real picture of the world and more and more draws its own, corresponding only to the interests of customers. Sooner or later, the differences become so obvious that the masses of disinformation simply cease to believe, even in those cases when they, according to the interests of the customers, report something reliable.

In the present circumstances, even the demonstration of the body in the misurata shopping center does not prove the death of the one whose name the troops of the legitimate authorities had recently stormed this nest of hired rebels. It is too easy to make up a corpse taken from any morgue.

Reliable evidence could be perhaps a genetic examination conducted by a group of independent researchers from countries of different political orientations (from Russia to Syria) with the participation of Gaddafi’s children. But the children themselves are also declared targets of NATO, and the politicians of most countries are not eager to form commissions independent of them.

In addition, in the current situation, all parties are equally interested in the official death of the creator of the most successful stories example of self-governing - almost to the degree of anarchy - of society.

NATO gets a reason to stop the official part of the aggression in Libya. After the capture of a significant part of Tripoli, British special forces had to be withdrawn mainly due to combat losses unacceptable by Western standards. The 3 of thousands of US marines who escorted the United States Foreign Secretary of the United States of America Hillary Dayan Hugh-Ellsworth Rodham (by her husband Clinton) on a quick trip were also unlikely to lose out on attempts to capture Sirt. The cost of the air part of the operation also surpassed all that was acceptable during the current Second Great Depression (not to mention the fact that precision-guided munitions were spent for the first couple of months of air raids, so cleaning Libyan cities — including Sirte — had to be endless, but extremely destructive, with a voluminous explosion ammunition ). And in general, the NATO troops need to relax and take into account the accumulated experience. After all, other members of the oil axis of Evil are ahead: Syria, Iran, Russia ...

Gaddafi - if he is alive, and did not stay under the ruins of Sirte (where he is unlikely to be found: it’s not for nothing that all evidence of his death has distinct traces of a fake) - also he is unlikely to want to go public. It is much more useful for him to wait for the official withdrawal of the enemy troops. It is clear that the West will not let Libya out of actual control. But it is much easier to deal with private military corporations: not every mercenary is willing to risk his own life, and it’s more difficult to call air support. Of course, the Colonel adheres to knightly views - but he still has led hundreds of isolated tribes for four decades and knows how to not only look for compromises, but also play on the contradictions of their interests. I suppose there are no fewer contradictions between countries that consider themselves developed. Therefore, the termination of the operation, forcing them to official unanimity, will allow Gaddafi to more effectively resist their forces in his country.

But if the Colonel is indeed killed, I really do not envy his enemies.

He had long tried to play by the rules established by the West as binding on all his opponents. In particular, he was repeatedly accused of supporting terrorists - but not once was such an accusation proven. Even the process of the explosion of a passenger plane over the Scottish town of Lockerby, although it led to the condemnation of a citizen of Libya, is far from indisputable. All evidence of the Libyan trail went through such a dubious way, including several closed operations of Western intelligence services, that an unbiased lawyer could easily prove their inadequacy. Gaddafi only after a long-term economic blockade of Libya agreed to pay compensation to the relatives of the victims - and he said that the country is only morally responsible for what happened, since the Libyan was convicted.

When the NATO aggression began, many Libyans and Libyan supporters living in other countries were ready to respond to it in a way that is accessible to the weak against the strong, by terror. The colonel, however, forbade such a potent remedy: until the last moment he hoped to reach an agreement with people officially declaring generally acceptable goals. If Gaddafi does not exist now, the ban he proclaims expires for his followers.

Julia Sarkozy may never talk with her father in her life: he runs the risk of riding a gun carriage, covered with the national flag, long before she learns to speak. Wishing to deal with the organizers of the invasion of Libya will be every day more and more. The country will now be robbed seriously. Gaddafi's established procedure for the division of petrodollars among all Libyans will be a pleasant memory. And many will decide: those who have broken it must answer for their broken life.

If Gaddafi's body is dead, his business takes on a new life.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Aleksey42
    Aleksey42 26 October 2011 20: 05 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I am not familiar with the details of NATO’s military operation in Libya (for example, about the volume of explosive ordnance and the losses of insurgents and NATO), but in general I agree with Anatoly. The genie is released from the bottle, and judging by Iraq and Afghanistan, no one really knows (or maybe does not want) how to drive him back. Particularly touched by the "United States of America", a much more accurate translation.
    1. His
      His 26 October 2011 21: 36 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Watch the video on the y-tube "In memory of Muammar Gaddafi." Said good there
      1. Aleksey42
        Aleksey42 26 October 2011 22: 11 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Thanks for the link.
  2. Rashid 26 October 2011 20: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Today, somewhere there was news that the son of Muammar, Safe-Al-Islam, agreed to voluntarily surrender and appear before the Hague tribunal. Of course, this is from the words of the so-called PNS of Libya (somehow the language does not dare to call from the government).
    1. URB
      URB 26 October 2011 21: 13 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      full bre and provocation!
      “At this historical time, when some believe that everything is over and everything has died, I want to clearly define my tasks and say - now everything is just beginning” - Safe Al Islam recently said!
  3. lightforcer
    lightforcer 26 October 2011 20: 28 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If Gaddafi was alive, he must be in the local media. And now even his supporters acknowledge the killing.
    1. Tjumenec72
      Tjumenec72 26 October 2011 21: 58 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Also inclined to the version of the Heroic death of the Desert Lion from bombs.
      Everything else is Hollywood !!!
      And if the paddling pool “choked” it would be an uppercut.
      I understand it’s not nice to wish someone harm, but a man should be responsible for his actions! Hold the cyanchic strike.
  4. maksim 26 October 2011 21: 24 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    the Americans in the person of her government of the "Masons" are in fact the most insignificant and miserable nation, remember Hiroshima and Nagosaki, only they are given the "right" to decide the fate of people. During the Second World, they talked about such death-occupiers
    1. Ion coaelung
      Ion coaelung 27 October 2011 11: 45 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Amer is like cockroaches, all wish death to them, and they live on themselves further and breed. The loyal army of "US patriots" will free itself from the invaders in their own territory! The division of the world into many small groups guarantees them the impossibility of a retaliatory strike. Think about how unconnected small countries can resist the United States? Moreover, they have England, the EU with NATO and a number of colonies and occupied states around the world behind them. So just do not give them death!
  5. Banshee 26 October 2011 21: 30 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    "The colonel holds knightly views - but he has managed hundreds of separate tribes for four decades and knows how to not only look for compromises, but also play on the contradictions of their interests."

    This is the essence. The problem will be precisely in the fact that if the PnS is not able to keep the gadhafs, Tuareg and others in check, then they will get a not weak war. Or stupidly will spread gnobit dissenters. Which is basically the same thing. After all, the war will not be fought for the memory of the deceased (most likely) Gaddafi, but for a real tomorrow. For delbezh income from oil and other things.

    Moreover, it is unlikely that Safe Al Islam is such a weakling that it will decide to take it and surrender to The Hague. Did he not hear about you and Milosevic and Hussein? Don't look like a fool ...

    All are now busy with one thing: observation. They are observing the development in the region as a whole, and, judging by the elections in Tunisia, the show does not follow the script. Sharia allows much in the attitude of the infidels. Including the orphanage of Julia Sarkozy. It is, by the way, justified. Muammarovich died, which would prevent to take blood from Sarkozy? And the reason is again not a blood feud. Sarkozy took a lot of money to the polls. And did not give. And now the type wrote off debts. Continue to continue? We recall 90, and now those who are the successors of Gaddafi (not even a son, but a tribe) can demand money back ... And in case of refusal, they can easily make a bubu.
    1. Tjumenec72
      Tjumenec72 26 October 2011 22: 03 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      what happened to the Truffle, and then there is no one to take revenge - in Libya, because now there is democracy)
  6. UAZ Patriot 26 October 2011 22: 06 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    A retired colonel, who had been in Libya at one time, is with me. So, listening to his impressions, I add the words "Gaddafi, the creator of the most successful example in world history of a self-governing - almost to the extent of anarchy - society."
  7. APASUS 26 October 2011 22: 21 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    By killing Gaddafi, the Americans themselves, not wanting to, elevated him to a number of martyrs! And now attacks and attacks will be carried out on his behalf. For them, it would be more profitable to put him in court, even if puppet!
    1. Tjumenec72
      Tjumenec72 27 October 2011 07: 58 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And the man turned out to be heroic, and the captive was not a prisoner (he wasn’t going to catch him later).
      He died from the bombs. Who to judge? whom to put in prison?
      It was from inevitability (in order to logically end a very costly war game) that they played a show. After all, an actor cannot be imprisoned.
  8. Joker 26 October 2011 22: 24 New
    • -13
    • 0
    -13
    Guesses of the old senility.
    1. sedoj 26 October 2011 22: 56 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      your poison presses your brain.
      1. Joker 26 October 2011 22: 57 New
        • -11
        • 0
        -11
        No, in my opinion he presses on yours, unless of course there is something to press ....
  9. Whole 26 October 2011 23: 14 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    If Gaddafi’s body is dead, his work takes on a new life. The main idea.
    APASUS - I fully agree
  10. Nick 27 October 2011 01: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The fact that peace in Libya after the death of the Colonel will not be clear as a day. But NATO will pour out. Not immediately, but as the management structure of the Colonel’s supporters is recreated, and indeed indeed the peasants with obik can last ride on carriages.
  11. Ruslank
    Ruslank 27 October 2011 03: 57 New
    • -9
    • 0
    -9
    Old senile with abstruse conspiratorial fantasies ...
    1. Vadim
      Vadim 27 October 2011 08: 34 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Wasserman is smarter than hundreds of people like you, but not two or three times, but more. First, do at least something in life, then vomit.
  12. evgenm55 27 October 2011 08: 37 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    The destruction of Libya as a state at this stage is a fact. In whose interests, for what purpose and with whose hands this crime was committed, only our president does not know how he says this is the triumph of the people and the victory of democracy. The death of the Leader of the country is also a big question for me, for now ... But the question is, who is next and when? How long will it take for the jackals to reconnoiter and concentrate forces and means for the next capture and destruction of the state? And, when, finally, we begin to understand that we are already standing in line for this and must be taken at least some measures to protect the remnants of the Independent State and its people. Measures, not endless chatter and trade in the Motherland. And is it not time to remember Klochkov’s words: THERE IS NEVER GETTING STARTED,
  13. mitya
    mitya 27 October 2011 09: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And I think that not only Pindos will get, they can also grab us to the heap