Iraq urged Saudi Arabia to establish international oversight

18
Iraq’s Vice President al-Maliki made an unexpected statement in which he called for an international protectorate over Saudi Arabia to be established as a distributor and sponsor of Islamism, the newspaper said Look with reference to the TV channel Afaq Wesal.

Iraq urged Saudi Arabia to establish international oversight


“The international community must intervene and prevent the spread of extremist ideologies emanating from Saudi Arabia and put the monarchy under global oversight and governance. Otherwise, international terrorism will be strengthened by sponsoring Saudi oil dollars, ”said al-Maliki.

“The Saudi kingdom must become an international protectorate in order to prevent the spread of extremism,” he added.

The reaction from the Arab community followed immediately.

“These theses are absurd, especially in the light of the effective and important role that the kingdom plays in combating terrorism and extremism at the global, national and regional level,” the official statement of the Muslim organization says.

Al-Maliki’s statement seemed very audacious to Iraq’s President Fuad Masoum. His press secretary said: “Al-Maliki’s statement is his personal position and does not represent the opinion of the President of Iraq.”

But the angry reaction from the Saudis is not over. “We, the Arabs, are witnessing what is happening in Iraq now. This country does not even make logical attempts to establish trust with any Arab in the region. This country is hostage to the fears and failures of its power. How can he blame an Arab country for anything, be it the Kingdom or any other country, while she is passing the hardest time in his stories“, - wrote the chief editor of the influential newspaper“ Riyadh ”Abdullah al-Sadiri.

“Vzglyad” notes that the press in Saudi Arabia is under the strict control of the state, therefore all publications must necessarily coincide with the opinion of the royal family.

Alexander Ignatenko, President of the Institute of Religion and Politics, commented on the situation: “The strange idea of ​​a“ protectorate over Saudi Arabia ”is not a personal fantasy of the Iraqi vice-president. With regard to the division of the territory of Saudi Arabia, various ideas are being thrown, including by the Americans. I do not think that this is a state policy, so far these are only the ideas of individual characters. But there are some forces that encourage this policy. There are such ideas among Iranians. ”

“According to this project, the kingdom is divided into separate pieces. In particular, such a part as the Eastern Province is highlighted. We are talking about the territory, in 90% inhabited by Shiites (which are a minority in the Sunni Saudi kingdom), and here are the main oil reserves of Saudi Arabia, ”Ignatenko said.

"Moreover, - he notes, - for a hypothetical separatist entity, they have already invented a name - the Republic of Al-Qatif al-Hass, after the name of a city in eastern Saudi Arabia."

Nevertheless, the expert emphasizes that “the statements of Nuri al-Maliki about an international protectorate over the territory of Saudi Arabia are nothing more than a political provocation.”
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    18 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +5
      24 July 2015 11: 19
      It is interesting and who will exercise control? Mattresses? Impudent Saxons?
      The idea of ​​utopia. Although the Russian Federation and many more will be beneficial to anyone ..
      1. +4
        24 July 2015 11: 22
        Nevertheless, the expert emphasizes that “the statements of Nuri al-Maliki about an international protectorate over the territory of Saudi Arabia are nothing more than a political provocation.”

        But all the same: "It's a trifle, but nice!" smile
        1. +2
          24 July 2015 11: 28
          It seems to me that soon a new vice president will be in Iraq.
        2. +2
          24 July 2015 11: 30
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          But all the same: "It's a trifle, but nice!"

          The idea must be developed!
        3. 0
          24 July 2015 12: 24
          “The Saudi kingdom must become an international protectorate in order to prevent the spread of extremism,”

          Yes, it's time! But! Who will allow it? The mattress has its own gesheft there and they are all covered up.
          1. 0
            25 July 2015 18: 23
            Maliki well done! He told the truth, about which many know, but are afraid of the United States to talk
    2. +4
      24 July 2015 11: 19
      The fact that the Saudis are sponsors of terrorism, because of which Iraq got in every sense, yes ... But how to divide this hydra? Each piece will then bite ...
      1. +3
        24 July 2015 12: 08
        Shiites have the main reserves in the south-east of the country, so if divided by pieces, the oil regions will fall under the protectorate of Iran, and then the Islamists will be strained with money. and this is a plus.
    3. +6
      24 July 2015 11: 24
      What protectorate, what is he talking about? As long as the Saudis are supplying oil at low prices to the West, no one will touch them. There is no talk of any "democracy and freedom of speech" there. They live according to Sharia law. The death penalty there is a common thing, stoning, chopping off hands - the same ...! And not a single infection in the West says that this is a crime and an infringement of human rights and freedoms.
      And the fact that the Saudis finance terrorists around the world, we know from the time of the Chechen wars. But, according to the West, this is a fair fight against the tyrannical regimes of Putin, Assad, and Gaddafi.
    4. +2
      24 July 2015 11: 27
      Bomb both Libya and the terrorists will disappear without sponsors.
      1. +1
        24 July 2015 11: 31
        Quote: Igor39
        Bomb like Libya

        Do not be like y-dishes-kam from the countries of victorious Satanism.
        1. 0
          24 July 2015 12: 14
          it is not necessary to bomb the whole country, but it’s quite possible to launch several Kyrgyz Republics through the palaces of the monarchy.
          1. 0
            25 July 2015 06: 10
            Quote: just explo
            This country is not necessary to bomb the country, but it’s quite possible to launch several Kyrgyz Republics through the palaces of the monarchy

            Gaddafi, Hussein, Milosevic ...
          2. 0
            25 July 2015 06: 10
            Quote: just explo
            This country is not necessary to bomb the country, but it’s quite possible to launch several Kyrgyz Republics through the palaces of the monarchy

            Gaddafi, Hussein, Milosevic ...
      2. +1
        24 July 2015 18: 07
        No need to bomb anyone. We must work with the Islamic world, opening his eyes to the United States, as to the Kingdom of Satan. Propaganda and propaganda again. The Islamists themselves organize the rest.
        The Kremlin's "strategists" turn to the United States as "partners"
    5. +1
      24 July 2015 11: 29
      The thought, in general, is sound, it is also necessary to do with Qatar. But the protectorate will be able to carry out only the United States and its allies (this is to get oil and gas not at a low price, but in general for guaranteed), and therefore there will be no sense.
    6. +1
      24 July 2015 11: 36
      Sense is possible if China and India take up the matter under the supervision of Russia and the United States ...
    7. +1
      24 July 2015 11: 41
      Trial ball. The kingdom is rocking gradually and from different angles. Soon the rebellion within the kingdom will be muddied.
    8. +1
      24 July 2015 11: 49
      and the thought and idea have long been unfounded, the question of who will be watching in the region, the UN is silent like a fish in a pie, the Yankees, while their interests are in the region, will not make any sudden movements in regulating oil prices, although everyone knows that the Saudis the essence and are troublemakers and hotbed of Islamic terrorism ...
    9. 0
      24 July 2015 12: 06
      very not a bad idea.
    10. +1
      24 July 2015 12: 23
      Speech by the next capitalist provocateur.
      Of course, it’s not at least clever to deny sponsoring ISIS by the Saudis, but it’s even more foolish to forget that ISIS is not only their brainchild and as much as the United States.
      At the same time, the Iraqi vice president is not in a hurry with calls to establish an international protectorate over the United States.
      The idea is as old as the world, if someone has something to take away - we will accuse of violating democratic (and any other) norms, and only for good intentions we will take everything for ourselves.
      Even boring somehow ... at least something new came up.
    11. 0
      24 July 2015 12: 42
      called for an international protectorate over Saudi Arabia, as a distributor and sponsor of Islamism

      There is no dispute that the SA is the main sponsor of radical Islam, as well as the fact that, together with the United States, it armed and provided money to both Alkaida and ISIS. But for what reason such a statement was made is not entirely clear.
    12. 0
      24 July 2015 12: 57
      Well, no one and they never said who is to blame for all this, in the Middle East. It’s kind of blind to call the blind, but the facts speak for it. Well, not that none of them understands, mattresses are brazenly wanting to own the region through Saudi Arabia.
    13. 0
      24 July 2015 20: 01
      And shackled.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"