Military Review

The Chinese brought to the biathlon tanks ZTZ-96A

63
Chinese arrived in Russia to participate in tank biathlon Tanks type ZTZ-96A (Type 96A), which are slightly different from those that were last year, reports Messenger of Mordovia.

The Chinese brought to the biathlon tanks ZTZ-96A


“Judging by the photos that appeared on the Web, during the unloading at the Selyatino station in the Moscow region, several lightweight rollers were installed on the tanks, the design of mud shields was changed, elements of dynamic protection were removed from the upper frontal part,” notes the author of the publication.

Earlier, "Herald" made the assumption that the machines "will be changed into new tracks", in order to avoid a repetition of last year's problems with tracks. However, the tankers from China again arrived with the old tracks, which were used 70 years ago on Soviet tanks.

Military analysts most of all, of course, are interested in which engines are equipped with cars, has their power been increased? Last year, the Chinese themselves criticized their tanks for weak engines, which did not allow them to compete with Russian T-72B3 on the high-speed sections of the route.

“If the cars are modified, it will immediately be noticeable during the competition. In any case, this year the Chinese tankers are the most formidable rivals of our crews, and the spectators will see very bright and spectacular competitions, ”concludes the Herald of Mordovia.
Photos used:
vestnik-rm.ru
63 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avt
    avt 21 July 2015 10: 38
    +9
    I looked like a biathlon and the Chinese were not impressed, either by shooting or by running. It's a little liquid compared to the old T-72, but its positioned like new.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 21 July 2015 10: 42
      +8
      Quote: avt
      nor running

      It seems that no one else broke as much as the Chinese.
      1. Grandfather bear
        Grandfather bear 21 July 2015 14: 00
        +3
        I sit, read, the granddaughter is quietly "creeping up".
        - "Grandpa! What is Mordoria? !!"
        In the next room, the son is laughing.
        I ask what is laughing?
        He begins to explain what "Mordoria" is and how it differs from Mordovia.
        Smiled.
        After explaining to his granddaughter where and what kind of Mordovia, he thought for it and understood, it’s apparently our trolls are a mattress for knowledge of geography!
        They are the attitude of the films are!
        So the "BULLETIN OF MORDOVIA" will be quite good for them as "MORDORIA"! laughing
    2. bolat19640303
      bolat19640303 21 July 2015 10: 47
      +21
      Quote: avt
      I looked like a biathlon and the Chinese were not impressed, either by shooting or by running. It's a little liquid compared to the old T-72, but its positioned like new.


      They fired no better, but no worse than the others. Even in comparison with the T-72B3 prepared for biathlon. Only T-72B3 was second in mobility, no other rivals.
      The external differences mentioned in the article Type 96A are not so significant for increasing the mobility of the machine. We will look at the biathlon what he is.
      1. Byshido_dis
        Byshido_dis 21 July 2015 10: 55
        +4
        And I really liked the game. This is our first experience in such a game. Although not all pancake happened, but there were a lot of stocks. This year will be very interesting!
      2. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 21 July 2015 11: 02
        +4
        They won the shooting outright.
        1. Bort radist
          Bort radist 21 July 2015 11: 38
          +4
          Quote: voyaka uh
          They won the shooting outright.

          Biathlon is when they shoot and run. And separately it is shooting and cross. Earlier there was a "patrol race". A team of four people ran, they were shooting, everyone left the shooting range as a team.
        2. Colorists
          Colorists 21 July 2015 12: 49
          +2
          Quote: voyaka uh
          They won the shooting outright.



          for one simple reason, the Chinese fired BPS, and our cops.
          1. Banson
            Banson 21 July 2015 12: 53
            +1
            Quote: Colorists
            for one simple reason, the Chinese fired BPS, and our cops.

            Why?
        3. dyksi
          dyksi 21 July 2015 13: 18
          +1
          In the finals, the genius Mehvo snatched out our victory, but they shot just very badly.
        4. Siberian1965
          Siberian1965 22 July 2015 07: 15
          0
          They fired better especially in motion. I agree.
      3. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 21 July 2015 11: 34
        +11
        Absolutely right. By the way, there were no other samples. That says a lot. Probably not everyone will be able to really claim good results. And China is great. I brought it and that I was surprisingly surprised by my results. I'm sure the Chinese are looking for the best option for their tank. neglect was always expensive. Biathlon is not just a competition but also a search for new solutions. Best regards.
      4. Kent0001
        Kent0001 21 July 2015 12: 52
        0
        We’ll see them at the biathlon, we’ll see ..... but the sew will not put up the T-90?
    3. Banson
      Banson 21 July 2015 10: 51
      +15
      Don't talk nonsense. They fired better than ours, and much more. And in terms of speed, they were clearly inferior only to the charged T-72B3M with an engine from the T-90MS, which is in some way a show tank specifically for competitions.
      1. Letun
        Letun 21 July 2015 11: 14
        +2
        Quote: Banson
        Don't talk nonsense. They fired better than ours, and much more. And in terms of speed, they were clearly inferior only to the charged T-72B3M with an engine from the T-90MS, which is in some way a show tank specifically for competitions.

        Banson, you wrote it right, but local posts don't like such posts. Zaminusuyut wink
        1. Colorists
          Colorists 21 July 2015 12: 52
          +2
          and you take a closer look than ours and the Chinese shot. in VK I asked the crew commander of one of the winners on TB Marat Halikov Ivan
          Hello, please tell me what types of ammunition they shot at the tank biathlon.
          15.01.15

          Marat
          Comulative
          25.01.15
          https://vk.com/marat0577705
          Ivan
          ATP
      2. Colorists
        Colorists 21 July 2015 12: 48
        +1
        Quote: Banson
        Don't talk nonsense. They fired better than ours, and much more. And in terms of speed, they were clearly inferior only to the charged T-72B3M with an engine from the T-90MS, which is in some way a show tank specifically for competitions.



        they fired better than ours because they used BPS, and ours on B3 fired cumulatively
        1. Rider
          Rider 21 July 2015 13: 00
          +3
          Not with cumulative, but with training, inert shells, everyone shot except the Chinese.
        2. Banson
          Banson 21 July 2015 13: 00
          +10
          Firstly, why didn’t we use BOPS? They banned it or what? Why didn't others use BOPS? As for the CS, their flight time, even to the most distant target, is of the order of 2 seconds. With normal LMS, getting into is not a problem. Our T-72B, as well as our T-72B3M itself (which apparently aimed through the main TPD-K1 because SOSNA-U is extremely inconvenient), normally fired only from a place at a fixed target. This 1A40 SLA exercise works well. But as soon as it came to shooting from the move to the flank (that is, where you need to take into account the lateral correction for the speed of the tank) - so our 72-ki merged .. Their shooting very little resembled normal shooting from the move, but more like shooting from a short stop. But the Chinese without any problems performed this exercise moving at a speed of 20-25km / h. That’s the whole difference. When shooting at a moving target, I think it would be even worse.
          1. Alekseev
            Alekseev 21 July 2015 14: 35
            +5
            Quote: Banson
            normally shot only from a place on a motionless target.

            Quote: Banson
            then exercise SUO 1A40 fulfills well.

            1A40 is a sight, and not the entire OMS (there are OMS with a similar name, for example, 1A33, 1A34, etc.).
            They also call him TPD-1K (tank quantum sight-rangefinder quantum).
            He is not the last word, PDPS 1G42 (T-80B, t-64B) and others will be better. But not fatal. No.
            And, the main thing is that for "shooting from a place at a stationary target" and 100% hits at the ranges used in this biathlon no SLA is needed at all. yes
            It is only necessary to carefully verify the zero line of aiming at a distant point and, perhaps, to shoot with a cumulative (practical) projectile taking into account the weight marks of the ammunition used in the competition.
            One may ask, why, at a biathlon in shooting, is 100% or a result close to it?
            Well, there could be a ton of reasons.
            And psychological, and omissions in the preparation of tank weapons for firing, and the fact that tanks hit mercilessly on the highway. The sighting mark has shifted by 1 mm and shorter ..., by 1000 m there will already be about 1 m deviation.
            The tank is a sturdy car, but breaking it with a fool of the mind is very simple.
            Any experienced tanker will confirm to you that for firing, and especially for full-time ones, they always tried to take the newest tanks from the combat training group, and the ones that were broken up for driving.
            1. Banson
              Banson 21 July 2015 14: 46
              +1
              Quote: Alekseev
              1A40 is a sight, and not the entire OMS (there are OMS with a similar name, for example, 1A33, 1A34, etc.).

              Well, a little bit wrong. TPD-K1 is a laser rangefinder sight, which was installed on the T-72A. The T-72B already has a semi-automated MSA 1A40, which is based on the same TPD-K1 sight. That is, all the "brains" of the MSA are sewn up in it. So in this case it is almost the same thing except for the sensors of the firing conditions.
              Quote: Alekseev
              And, the main thing is that for "shooting from a place at a fixed target" and 100% hits at the ranges used in this biathlon, no SLA is needed at all.

              The maximum range there is as far as 1800 meters are known. For firing in a strong wind, as well as on the move, especially with caliber shells, an FCS is needed even at such a distance.
              Quote: Alekseev
              Any experienced tanker will confirm to you that for firing, and especially for full-time ones, they always tried to take the newest tanks from the combat training group, and the ones that were broken up for driving.

              Well, before the competition, of course, you need to configure the OMS and align the sight. And if all this goes astray due to the fact that the tank quickly drove along the bumps of 100 meters - such a tank is worthless.
              1. Alekseev
                Alekseev 21 July 2015 18: 04
                +2
                Quote: Banson
                And if all this goes astray due to the fact that the tank quickly drove along bumps of 100 meters

                From the fact that "quickly drove over bumps 100 m" is unlikely to go astray. But from the fact that he kissed the mother-damp earth "jumping from a springboard", etc. doing things can go astray. Otherwise, the reconciliation would be done once, at the plant and the spare parts for this case were not attached.
                Without delving into the intricacies of the names of the MSA of modern MBTs, I still have my own opinion: complex, expensive and sophisticated sights and stabilizers can only show themselves when shooting on the move, at long range, in conditions of limited visibility, at targets moving at relatively high speeds .
                If the Chinese were allowed to shoot BPS, which I don’t believe in because of safety requirements (restrictions on the airspace), then the capabilities of a perfect SLA were completely less important for them than others shooting practical shells.
                Not fair! laughing
                But, most importantly, the biathlon raises the popularity of military service and tank troops. And that's great!
                1. Banson
                  Banson 21 July 2015 19: 44
                  0
                  Quote: Alekseev
                  But, most importantly, the biathlon raises the popularity of military service and tank troops. And that's great!


                  And most importantly, it raises the popularity of tank power. Which is already on top thanks to WoT.
    4. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 21 July 2015 11: 22
      0
      The T-72 B3 is no longer the base tank ... Only the hull is native there. The filling is completely different.
      1. Banson
        Banson 21 July 2015 11: 24
        +1
        This is not true. This is true for T-90A. In T-72B3, almost everything is old, with the exception of a couple of new working pieces of iron. That's why he is a cheap tank of mass production.
    5. svp67
      svp67 21 July 2015 19: 16
      +1
      Quote: avt
      I looked like a biathlon and the Chinese were not impressed, either by shooting or by running. It's a little liquid compared to the old T-72, but its positioned like new.

      There was a "test of the pen". This biathlon will be more interesting and dynamic. The Chinese are clearly better prepared.
      Judging by the photos that appeared on the web, during the unloading at the Selyatino station in the Moscow Region, several lightweight rollers were installed on the tanks, the design of the mud flaps was changed, and dynamic protection elements were removed from the upper frontal part
      that is, these are visible signs of how the Chinese are trying to raise the speed qualities of their tank - by facilitating and improving the protection of the fur-water devices from dirt. I think that their engines are more powerful and with the LMS they earned extra money.
      In short, we will see soon ...
  2. family tree
    family tree 21 July 2015 10: 42
    +22
    Even, I have a chuyka that the tanks, specialists for biathlon will soon begin to cook, well, like cars for the "Dakar" what
    1. Login_Off
      Login_Off 21 July 2015 10: 52
      +6
      And rightly so! Rally cars are being prepared, KAMAZs are also being prepared, but this only colors the competition, and the company that prepared it receives prestige.
      So what needs to be prepared!
      1. Bort radist
        Bort radist 21 July 2015 11: 40
        +1
        Quote: Login_Off
        And rightly so! Rally cars are cooking

        And then all the best practices in mass production.
      2. Dezinto
        Dezinto 21 July 2015 13: 11
        +10
        Then separate disciplines will introduce ...- tank drift, wassat

        or a sprint for three kilometers)))
        1. vadimab
          vadimab 21 July 2015 14: 34
          0
          ..only wings are not enough laughing : will fly low
    2. evil partisan
      evil partisan 21 July 2015 11: 07
      +3
      Quote: perepilka
      Even, I have a chuyka that the tanks, specialists for biathlon will soon begin to cook, well, like cars for the "Dakar"

      It is not good to read other people's thoughts, and then also pass them off as ours, Colleague. sad
      1. family tree
        family tree 21 July 2015 11: 10
        +2
        Quote: Angry Guerrilla
        It is not good to read other people's thoughts, and then also pass them off as ours, Colleague. sad

        Well, sorry, I have to, take my mine next time request Cho is to blame recourse
        1. evil partisan
          evil partisan 21 July 2015 11: 14
          +1
          Quote: perepilka
          next time take mine

          Better fish ... wink
          1. family tree
            family tree 21 July 2015 11: 25
            0
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            Better fish ... wink

            Yur, you’re a good kid, you know that he’s not a fisherman, a blackmailer, damn it. laughing
            1. evil partisan
              evil partisan 21 July 2015 11: 32
              +2
              Quote: perepilka
              Yur

              am Do not fall to the office. Urgently remove!
              1. family tree
                family tree 21 July 2015 16: 03
                0
                Quote: Angry Guerrilla
                am Do not fall to the office. Urgently remove!

                Would you even take off a budennovka or something what drinks
                1. family tree
                  family tree 21 July 2015 17: 43
                  +2
                  Like boys, word of chech, pluses,
                  minus signs, shoulder straps. I’ve been here for the third year, and what happened before Ukraine is now. Although, the more visitors, the faster the ads will disperse, Only this site, do not turn it into a political bog, but. With respect hi
                  1. evil partisan
                    evil partisan 21 July 2015 19: 05
                    +1
                    Quote: perepilka
                    Ches word, pluses,
                    minus signs, shoulder straps.
                    And do not say Colleague. hi
                    We didn’t invent this game ... And if someone takes these pluses and minuses very seriously, I would like to wish this person to do something useful in life. Well, for example, digging up virgin lands under cucumbers.
                    And I am screaming: not Yura !! A half-act. hi Please, so to speak ...
                2. evil partisan
                  evil partisan 21 July 2015 19: 10
                  +1
                  Quote: perepilka
                  You

                  Not YOU, but YOU !! am
                  We did not graze deer together request!
                  And calling me is a half-act! Please remember to continue to not bother me with lawyers !! It’s free. winked
  3. Magic archer
    Magic archer 21 July 2015 10: 42
    +5
    I watched not so long ago last year’s tank biathlon. In short, we can say that if the Chinese were inferior in terms of running and ours, it was not much, but the shooting was at least equal! The LMS and the gunner’s excellent training allowed him to reach the firing line and immediately hit the target. it’s still annoying that ours are playing on the T-72. A great car, but where are the T-90?! The Chinese are not shy about boasting new tanks, and we are all in the last century ....
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 21 July 2015 10: 47
      +6
      Quote: Magic Archer
      The Chinese are not shy about boasting new tanks, and we are all in the last century ....

      Well, they don’t bring Tip99 either.
    2. VP
      VP 21 July 2015 10: 53
      0
      Is B3 so much inferior to the T-90?
      1. Banson
        Banson 21 July 2015 10: 55
        +1
        Yes. Strong.
        1. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 21 July 2015 11: 00
          +1
          Quote: Banson
          Yes. Strong.

          Where is the T-72B3M "strongly" inferior to the T-90?
          1. Banson
            Banson 21 July 2015 11: 05
            +4
            Armor, OMS, and in particular the instrumentation of the commander’s workplace. It is heaven and earth. In this resource, I remember there was an analysis of all the shortcomings of the T-72Б3. This tank is a modernization of the T-72B, designed to get into the troops a sufficient number of tanks that meet the modern requirements, even before the start of mass deliveries of the new generation tanks - T-14.
            1. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets 21 July 2015 11: 10
              +1
              Quote: Banson
              Armor

              A very important indicator in the tank biathlon.
              Quote: Banson
              instrumentation commander’s workplace

              B3M is not so critical to speak
              Quote: Banson
              Strongly.
              1. Banson
                Banson 21 July 2015 11: 14
                +3
                Quote: Vladimirets
                B3M is not so critical to speak
                Quote: Banson
                Strongly.

                That is so critical. Good old TKN-3MK. For the 70's, it’s still normal, and then it’s not so much. Now - carcasses of light. Add to this the extremely uncomfortable position of the SOSNA-U sight, in place of the old night light and everything will become clear to you.
                1. Artyom
                  Artyom 21 July 2015 12: 22
                  +3
                  I think the T-72 was chosen by us to equalize the chances with other participating countries. Not all countries have a T-90!
                  1. Banson
                    Banson 21 July 2015 12: 36
                    +17
                    The meaning of these competitions is to check what the equipment of the armored forces of a particular country is capable of. I will surprise and shock you - not everyone even has a T-72B that they received at competitions. For many, the T-55 remains the main tank in the army. And someone also has ARBAMS. All the salt was precisely in that to hold the competition of these machines. Ours acted simply. Everyone was given the same T-72B with an 840hp engine. (which automatically turned the competition into a competition between crews, not technology). In order to get a guaranteed prize place for ourselves, we took a specially prepared (in our army there are no such tanks) T-72B3M with an 1130hp engine. prudently sharpening the rules of the competition for speed (and not for shooting, which would be correct). The created idyll was somewhat tarnished by the Chinese with their TYPE-96A, which has a more advanced MSA and objectively better shoots, but ours, as I said, prudently sharpened the safety rules for speed. That is, even a missed T-72B3M still bypasses the Chinese due to the speed and comes first, even taking into account the penalties. Experts are well aware of all the farce in the conduct of these competitions, and the common people are "nravitso" like top government officials. We are first". Get it all.
  4. megaanatoli4
    megaanatoli4 21 July 2015 10: 43
    +5
    The main thing is that the fight is fair. In any case, competition is good for everyone.
  5. MilitaryKAZ
    MilitaryKAZ 21 July 2015 10: 46
    +6
    This Chinese tank is designed on the basis of the T-72, so I don't see anything like that, the Chinese are a country of copiers, you can safely call them "XEROX-COUNTRY", the Chinese have never been powerful, they could not even save LIBYA from NATO air strikes, although the Chinese invested a lot investment in LIBYA under KADDAFI, Moscow just gave Libya into the clutches of AGGRESSORS and that's it, so everyone who at this CHAT knows in the world there are two fists of the United States and the Russian Federation, and that's all, but China is only a country that cannot implement its strategy without the Russian Federation ...
    1. kocclissi
      kocclissi 21 July 2015 10: 54
      -5
      All tanks, one way or another copied from the first English tank! And so? All the copiers?
      1. family tree
        family tree 21 July 2015 11: 06
        +7
        Quote: kocclissi
        All tanks, one way or another copied from the first English tank!So what? All copiers?

        Well, if only the name should be kept in mind, but then you can reach the clay pot laughing
        1. kocclissi
          kocclissi 21 July 2015 13: 55
          0
          Quote: perepilka
          name keep in mind

          In general, this is exactly what I meant by: from the first English tank! Not so put it, but in fact in copying something, sometimes something new is born ...
      2. Banson
        Banson 21 July 2015 11: 12
        +16
        It is not true. The truth is that the layout of almost all modern tanks is taken from the French FT-17 tank. But no less than from the English monsters.
        1. kil 31
          kil 31 21 July 2015 14: 45
          +1
          Quote: Banson
          It is not true. The truth is that the layout of almost all modern tanks is taken from the French FT-17 tank. But no less than from the English monsters.

          This is the foundation of everyone in the world of tanks.
  6. splinter666
    splinter666 21 July 2015 10: 49
    +2
    That year they took the third place with this tank in the overall standings, not bad. If the mechanism is finalized, I think there is something to fear.
  7. Leeder
    Leeder 21 July 2015 11: 05
    +2
    No matter how they began to specifically lighten the tanks for biathlon ...
    It loses all meaning, but the essence for biathlon does not need armor, the barrel can be smaller in caliber, moreover, if you select a car in perfect condition, then the optics are cooler and the engine is more powerful. I would suggest dividing the competition only on our T-72B3 for everyone, and different cars separately, although how to compare them ... only if dueling with robots controlled by the crew remotely on board is a thought! laughing
    I think this show will surpass everyone! winked
  8. killganoff
    killganoff 21 July 2015 11: 06
    +5
    With such alignments and "Olympic" trends, in the tank building will appear sports versions of serial tanks.
    1. Chiropractor
      Chiropractor 21 July 2015 11: 11
      +9
      and also SUVs, plus understated and toned round .. laughing
  9. Hubun
    Hubun 21 July 2015 11: 10
    +2
    at past games their tank that let down more than once
  10. Ze Kot
    Ze Kot 21 July 2015 11: 21
    +1
    So the Chinese conduct field tests of their tanks ...
  11. new communist
    new communist 21 July 2015 11: 22
    +2
    The Chinese didn’t even beat MT-2, not to mention the MT-000 and type -3000 / 99/1, that is, if they won on these type 2 then what about the others.
    1. svp67
      svp67 21 July 2015 20: 22
      0
      Quote: New Communist
      The Chinese are cunning

      They are just calculating. It is clear that soon they will be withdrawing this tank from service, and quite a few have been released. Our biathlon is an excellent advertisement and anti-advertisement. Once they win, they will intercept a lot of orders for the sale of tanks from us ... They are a clear competitor to the T72.
  12. Tatar-in
    Tatar-in 21 July 2015 11: 26
    +2
    The Chinese need to be given their due, they are studying, and they are not learning badly, they draw conclusions from all such events, and very closely study the experience of other participating countries. Game by game, but practice is good.
  13. Wolka
    Wolka 21 July 2015 11: 33
    0
    however, a serious bid for victory, the bar of ambition among the Chinese is clearly raised to the maximum ...
  14. YaMZ-238
    YaMZ-238 21 July 2015 11: 48
    +1
    We need to put the T-14 ...
    1. Banson
      Banson 21 July 2015 11: 50
      0
      At least T-90A. Or .... T-55AMB. In salt passage speed, but in shooting we will win. Accurate 100mm NP in combination with ASUO will give an effect.
      1. Colorists
        Colorists 21 July 2015 13: 14
        0
        I thought that a rifled gun was less accurate than a smoothbore.
        1. Banson
          Banson 21 July 2015 13: 17
          +3
          Usually more accurate.
  15. ivan bogomolov
    ivan bogomolov 21 July 2015 11: 51
    0
    hole from a Chinese shell in the form of an asterisk, cool, how did they do it? And so, a very interesting competition. soldier
    1. Protos
      Protos 21 July 2015 13: 12
      -1
      The Chinese fired a speedy feathered BOPS laughing
      1. Banson
        Banson 21 July 2015 13: 14
        0
        Who forbade ours to shoot the same is unclear.
    2. Colorists
      Colorists 21 July 2015 13: 18
      +1
      this is a hole from the OBPS, the asterisk remains from the plumage https://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%81+%D1%81%D0%BD%D0 % B0% D1% 80
      %D1%8F%D0%B4&newwindow=1&es_sm=122&biw=1280&bih=923&tbm=isch&imgil=rMIU3KUw49L__
      M%253A%253BWQuelQpQNAj4xM%253Bhttp%25253A%25252F%25252Fwww.xliby.ru%25252Ftransp
      ort_i_aviacija%25252Ftehnika_i_vooruzhenie_1999_10%25252Fp6.php&source=iu&pf=m&f
      ir=rMIU3KUw49L__M%253A%252CWQuelQpQNAj4xM%252C_&usg=__Fep0ZSp2Fu2_8fJjZe86h_A_Zf
      o%3D&ved=0CDoQyjdqFQoTCOqM54T_68YCFcj-cgod084JEg&ei=3BuuVeouyP3LA9Odp5AB#imgdii=
      DQKtbORHkZLUuM%3A%3BDQKtbORHkZLUuM%3A%3BBH3kictSm7-xGM%3A&imgrc=DQKtbORHkZLUuM%3
      A&usg=__Fep0ZSp2Fu2_8fJjZe86h_A_Zfo%3D
  16. Victorio
    Victorio 21 July 2015 12: 59
    0
    Well done, it will be interesting to see, compare
  17. WYCCTPUJIA
    WYCCTPUJIA 21 July 2015 13: 20
    0
    Well, well, I'm very intrigued, really want to look at this unit in action.
  18. kg pv
    kg pv 21 July 2015 13: 21
    0
    Quote: Bort Radist
    Quote: Login_Off
    And rightly so! Rally cars are cooking

    And then all the best practices in mass production.

    KAMAZ-DAKAR is a Mercedes engine, zf gearbox, SISU axles and now the question is, where is KAMAZ and what developments will go into production?
    Glory to GOD that in tank construction this does not threaten us yet.
  19. gladcu2
    gladcu2 21 July 2015 20: 07
    0
    What about shooting at a masked target with target detection using a drone?

    Launching a drone and controlling it from a support vehicle or even better with an operator from a shooting tank?

    Or shooting at a target right away, but at a disguised one. Exercise return shooting. By conventional flash grenade launcher.
    3 sec. To return fire.

    You can set tasks close to real ones.

    At first glance, biathlon looks like a very strange activity. It seems to be a competition, but it’s not clear if the equipment is competing, or the crews.

    If the technique is necessary to stipulate conventions. And if the crews, then maybe on the turnstiles or cross?

    In a real battle, after all, whoever first discovered the enemy received an 80% chance of survival.
    Somehow closer to life, competition must be done.
  20. gladcu2
    gladcu2 21 July 2015 20: 21
    0
    Exercise tank duel.

    Opponents begin the exercise on unfamiliar terrain in a conditional square of 2x2 km with a natural relief.
    The time allotted for the exercise is 45 m.

    The task is considered completed if the enemy is held in sight for 1 second at a distance of .5 km., 1.5 seconds at a distance of 1 km. 2 sec at a distance of 2 km.

    Battle tactics and crew discretion.

    Shooting a battle with drones.
  21. Banson
    Banson 21 July 2015 21: 20
    0
    For starters, I would simply increase the range of fire at the borders. Now it is 1500m, 1600m and 1800m shells, 1000m for a coaxial machine gun, 1500m for an anti-aircraft machine gun, 2000m for missiles. I would make 2000, 2200 and 2500 for shells, 4000 for rocket. 1000 and 1500 for machine guns.
  22. Thompson
    Thompson 22 July 2015 11: 51
    0
    Biathlon has biathlon! And then there should be a competition between the crew + tank complexes. regardless of brand and imaginative skills.
    In a real battle, we won’t talk about what you such the tank was put against me ...
    By the way, in internal competitions it is necessary to really exhibit our different tanks ...
    And over time, how the running time of the competition will come and the rules may complicate ...
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. smershxnumx
    smershxnumx 22 July 2015 15: 46
    0
    Uncle Vova where is the landing