The analytical program "However," July 16, 2015
However, hello! We said that Greece was not going anywhere, that Tsipras would surrender. That for a real revolt against the system of financial dictate we need another will and a completely different mandate from the people ... But, frankly, not to the same extent!
Within a few hours, the ancient hero turned into a political Euro-insect. After a victory in the parliament over its own voters with the help of its political opponents, the government of Tsipras turned into a meaningless appendage to a cowardly and thievish traditional Greek establishment. And the Greek referendum - “the holiday of disobedience” - turned out to be an adornment of a revealing and instructive flogging.
"Ball" Tsipras burst. What color was it when it was a ball, as the donkey I asked from a famous cartoon? In general, it was considered red ... But the IMF, which was never considered red, came out with harsh criticism of the agreement dictated by the eurocreditors.
The IMF considers unrealistic any agreement with Greece if the problem with the stability of its debt burden is not solved. Its debt in the course of the implementation of the new assistance program over two years can reach 200% of GDP against the current 175%, according to an analysis published by the Fund. In this situation, says the IMF, debt relief measures are needed, which "go further than Europe has so far been ready to consider."
We said that the main problem is not who the big crooks are, the Greeks or their creditors. The problem is that the program of help is not any help. This is a program of instilling the economy in debt. But something before the IMF was not too shy to impose austerity programs on its clients ... Why is it such an epiphany? And with the fact that an interested player in the Greek stories were the United States. It was they who winked at Tsipras, encouraged him and promised to relieve him of his sufferings.
However, the training of Tsipras went according to another scenario, rigidly German, where the indicative whipping and the subsequent establishment of the ordnung over the sloppy Southern Europe is an end in itself. What is the difference between the current lenders ultimatum and the previous one? Nothing but one thing: the sale of Greek assets from the hammer. And who do you think will acquire these heavily depreciated assets?
So the Greek history of American senior comrades to their younger German comrades lose. Until. Unlike Ukrainian. At the same time, it must be understood that there is a motive according to which they would not allow themselves to lose these stories to a third party.
"Greece is a member of NATO, this is our southern border ... We also know about the ties that exist between Greece and Russia, since we are talking about the Orthodox world. Under such circumstances, it is unacceptable for the European structure to undergo destructive tendencies," the foreign minister said Affairs of France Manuel Valls.
However, achieved, sorry for the expression, a compromise is not a solution - neither economic nor political. Tsipras, blown away, is more of a problem than a victory. Because people can come in the place of “tsiprasov” stronger. Actually, such a serious analyst as George Friedman, the head of Stratforr, warns about this.
"One thing that I think the European financial elite does not understand, and the Americans have no idea about it at all - this is a social catastrophe occurring in Europe. They are so concerned about helping banks, and they think that if banks are functioning and bonds are paid, They are safe. But no. Because the highest danger for any financial magnate is 7,5 mm bullet. I mean that in European history such problems were solved in a certain way - whether to force a financial class, to liquidate it like in Russia ... "- commented on the Greek situation economist.